MqsR, a Crucial Regulator for Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Formation, Is a GCU-specific mRNA Interferase in Escherichia coli

The mqsR gene has been shown to be positively regulated by the quorum-sensing autoinducer AI-2, which in turn activates a two-component system, the qseB-qseC operon. This operon plays an important role in biofilm formation in Escherichia coli. However, its cellular function has remained unknown. Here, we found that 1 base downstream of mqsR there is a gene, ygiT, that is co-transcribed with mqsR. Induction of mqsR caused cell growth arrest, whereas ygiT co-induction recovered cell growth. We demonstrate that MqsR (98 amino acid residues), which has no homology to the well characterized mRNA interferase MazF, is a potent inhibitor of protein synthesis that functions by degrading cellular mRNAs. In vivo and in vitro primer extension experiments showed that MqsR is an mRNA interferase specifically cleaving mRNAs at GCU. The mRNA interferase activity of purified MqsR was inhibited by purified YgiT (131 residues). MqsR forms a stable 2:1 complex with YgiT, and the complex likely functions as a repressor for the mqsR-ygiT operon by specifically binding to two different palindromic sequences present in the 5′-untranslated region of this operon.It has been reported that quorum sensing is involved in biofilm formation (1–4). mqsR expression was found to be induced by 8-fold in biofilms (5) and also by the quorum-sensing signal autoinducer AI-2, which is a species-nonspecific signaling molecule produced by both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, including Escherichia coli (6). It has been reported that induction of mqsR activates a two-component system, the qseB-qseC operon, which is known to play an important role in biofilm formation (6). Thus, it has been proposed that MqsR (98 amino acid residues) is a regulator of biofilm formation because it activates qseB, which controls the flhDC expression required for motility and biofilm formation in E. coli (6). However, the cellular function of MqsR has remained unknown.Interestingly, all free-living bacteria examined to date contain a number of suicide or toxin genes in their genomes (7, 8). Many of these toxins are co-transcribed with their cognate antitoxins in an operon (termed toxin-antitoxin (TA)² operon) and form a stable complex in the cell, so their toxicity is subdued under normal growth conditions (9–11). However, the stability of antitoxins is substantially lower than that of their cognate toxins, so any stress causing cellular damage or growth inhibition that induces proteases alters the balance between toxin and antitoxin, leading to toxin release in the cell.To date, 16 (12) TA systems have been reported on the E. coli genome, including relB-relE (13, 14), chpBI-chpBK (15), mazEF (16–18), yefM-yoeB (19, 20), dinJ-yafQ (21, 22), hipBA and hicAB (23, 24), prlF-yhaV (25), and ybaJ-hha (26). Interestingly, all of these TA operons appear to use similar modes of regulation: the formation of complexes between antitoxins and their cognate toxins to neutralize toxin activity and the ability of TA complexes to autoregulate their expression. The cellular targets of some toxins have been identified. CcdB directly interacts with gyrase A and blocks DNA replication (27, 28). RelE, which by itself has no endoribonuclease activity, appears to act as a ribosome-associating factor that promotes mRNA cleavage at the ribosome A-site (13, 29, 30). PemK (31), ChpBK (15), and MazF (32) are unique among toxins because they target cellular mRNAs for degradation by functioning as sequence-specific endoribonucleases to effectively inhibit protein synthesis and thereby cell growth.MazF, ChpBK, and PemK have been characterized as sequence-specific endoribonucleases that cleave mRNA at the ACA, ACY (Y is U, A, or G), and UAH (H is C, A, or U) sequences, respectively. They are completely different from other known endoribonucleases such as RNases E, A, and T1, as these toxins function as protein synthesis inhibitors by interfering with the function of cellular mRNAs. It is well known that small RNAs, such as mRNA-interfering cRNA (33), microRNA (34), and small interfering RNA (35), interfere with the function of specific RNAs. These small RNAs bind to specific mRNAs to inhibit their expression. Ribozymes also act on their target RNAs specifically and interfere with their function (36). Therefore, MazF, ChpBK, and PemK homologs form a novel endoribonuclease family that exhibits a new mRNA-interfering mechanism by cleaving mRNAs at specific sequences. Thus, they have been termed “mRNA interferases” (2).During our search for TA systems on the E. coli genome, we found that the mqsR gene is co-transcribed with a downstream gene, ygiT. These two genes appear to function as a TA system, as their size is small (98 residues for MqsR and 131 residues for YgiT) and their respective open reading frames are separated by 1 bp. In this study, we demonstrate that MqsR-YgiT is a new E. coli TA system consisting of a toxin, MqsR, and an antitoxin, YgiT. Moreover, we identify MqsR as a novel mRNA interferase that does not exhibit homology to MazF. This toxin cleaves RNA at GCU sequences in vivo and in vitro. The implication of this finding as to how this mRNA interferase is involved in cell physiology and biofilm formation will be discussed.     

Sip1, a Novel RS Domain-Containing Protein Essential for Pre-mRNA Splicing

Previous studies have shown that protein-protein interactions among splicing factors may play an important role in pre-mRNA splicing. We report here identification and functional characterization of a new splicing factor, Sip1 (SC35-interacting protein 1). Sip1 was initially identified by virtue of its interaction with SC35, a splicing factor of the SR family. Sip1 interacts with not only several SR proteins but also with U1-70K and U2AF65, proteins associated with 5′ and 3′ splice sites, respectively. The predicted Sip1 sequence contains an arginine-serine-rich (RS) domain but does not have any known RNA-binding motifs, indicating that it is not a member of the SR family. Sip1 also contains a region with weak sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator suppressor of white apricot (SWAP). An essential role for Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing was suggested by the observation that anti-Sip1 antibodies depleted splicing activity from HeLa nuclear extract. Purified recombinant Sip1 protein, but not other RS domain-containing proteins such as SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, restored the splicing activity of the Sip1-immunodepleted extract. Addition of U2AF65 protein further enhanced the splicing reconstitution by the Sip1 protein. Deficiency in the formation of both A and B splicing complexes in the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract indicates an important role of Sip1 in spliceosome assembly. Together, these results demonstrate that Sip1 is a novel RS domain-containing protein required for pre-mRNA splicing and that the functional role of Sip1 in splicing is distinct from those of known RS domain-containing splicing factors.Pre-mRNA splicing takes place in spliceosomes, the large RNA-protein complexes containing pre-mRNA, U1, U2, U4/6, and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), and a large number of accessory protein factors (for reviews, see references 21, 22, 37, 44, and 48). It is increasingly clear that the protein factors are important for pre-mRNA splicing and that studies of these factors are essential for further understanding of molecular mechanisms of pre-mRNA splicing.Most mammalian splicing factors have been identified by biochemical fractionation and purification (3, 15, 19, 31–36, 45, 69–71, 73), by using antibodies recognizing splicing factors (8, 9, 16, 17, 61, 66, 67, 74), and by sequence homology (25, 52, 74).Splicing factors containing arginine-serine-rich (RS) domains have emerged as important players in pre-mRNA splicing. These include members of the SR family, both subunits of U2 auxiliary factor (U2AF), and the U1 snRNP protein U1-70K (for reviews, see references 18, 41, and 59). Drosophila alternative splicing regulators transformer (Tra), transformer 2 (Tra2), and suppressor of white apricot (SWAP) also contain RS domains (20, 40, 42). RS domains in these proteins play important roles in pre-mRNA splicing (7, 71, 75), in nuclear localization of these splicing proteins (23, 40), and in protein-RNA interactions (56, 60, 64). Previous studies by us and others have demonstrated that one mechanism whereby SR proteins function in splicing is to mediate specific protein-protein interactions among spliceosomal components and between general splicing factors and alternative splicing regulators (1, 1a, 6, 10, 27, 63, 74, 77). Such protein-protein interactions may play critical roles in splice site recognition and association (for reviews, see references 4, 18, 37, 41, 47 and 59). Specific interactions among the splicing factors also suggest that it is possible to identify new splicing factors by their interactions with known splicing factors.Here we report identification of a new splicing factor, Sip1, by its interaction with the essential splicing factor SC35. The predicted Sip1 protein sequence contains an RS domain and a region with sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator, SWAP. We have expressed and purified recombinant Sip1 protein and raised polyclonal antibodies against the recombinant Sip1 protein. The anti-Sip1 antibodies specifically recognize a protein migrating at a molecular mass of approximately 210 kDa in HeLa nuclear extract. The anti-Sip1 antibodies sufficiently deplete Sip1 protein from the nuclear extract, and the Sip1-depleted extract is inactive in pre-mRNA splicing. Addition of recombinant Sip1 protein can partially restore splicing activity to the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract, indicating an essential role of Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing. Other RS domain-containing proteins, including SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, cannot substitute for Sip1 in reconstituting splicing activity of the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract. However, addition of U2AF65 further increases splicing activity of Sip1-reconstituted nuclear extract, suggesting that there may be a functional interaction between Sip1 and U2AF65 in nuclear extract.     

Splitting the BLOSUM Score into Numbers of Biological Significance

Mathematical tools developed in the context of Shannon information theory were used to analyze the meaning of the BLOSUM score, which was split into three components termed as the BLOSUM spectrum (or BLOSpectrum). These relate respectively to the sequence convergence (the stochastic similarity of the two protein sequences), to the background frequency divergence (typicality of the amino acid probability distribution in each sequence), and to the target frequency divergence (compliance of the amino acid variations between the two sequences to the protein model implicit in the BLOCKS database). This treatment sharpens the protein sequence comparison, providing a rationale for the biological significance of the obtained score, and helps to identify weakly related sequences. Moreover, the BLOSpectrum can guide the choice of the most appropriate scoring matrix, tailoring it to the evolutionary divergence associated with the two sequences, or indicate if a compositionally adjusted matrix could perform better.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]