Neutralizing Antibodies in Sera from Macaques Infected with Chimeric Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Containing the Envelope Glycoproteins of either a Laboratory-Adapted Variant or a Primary Isolate of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

The magnitude and breadth of neutralizing antibodies raised in response to infection with chimeric simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) in rhesus macaques were evaluated. Infection with either SHIV-HXB2, SHIV-89.6, or SHIV-89.6PD raised high-titer neutralizing antibodies to the homologous SHIV (SHIV-89.6P in the case of SHIV-89.6PD-infected animals) and significant titers of neutralizing antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) strains MN and SF-2. With few exceptions, however, titers of neutralizing antibodies to heterologous SHIV were low or undetectable. The antibodies occasionally neutralized heterologous primary isolates of HIV-1; these antibodies required >40 weeks of infection to reach detectable levels. Notable was the potent neutralization of the HIV-1 89.6 primary isolate by serum samples from SHIV-89.6-infected macaques. These results demonstrate that SHIV-HXB2, SHIV-89.6, and SHIV-89.6P possess highly divergent, strain-specific neutralization epitopes. The results also provide insights into the requirements for raising neutralizing antibodies to primary isolates of HIV-1.     

Determinants of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Glycoprotein Activation by Soluble CD4 and Monoclonal Antibodies

Infection by some human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates is enhanced by the binding of subneutralizing concentrations of soluble receptor, soluble CD4 (sCD4), or monoclonal antibodies directed against the viral envelope glycoproteins. In this work, we studied the abilities of different antibodies to mediate activation of the envelope glycoproteins of a primary HIV-1 isolate, YU2, and identified the regions of gp120 envelope glycoprotein contributing to activation. Binding of antibodies to a variety of epitopes on gp120, including the CD4 binding site, the third variable (V3) loop, and CD4-induced epitopes, enhanced the entry of viruses containing YU2 envelope glycoproteins. Fab fragments of antibodies directed against either the CD4 binding site or V3 loop also activated YU2 virus infection. The activation phenotype was conferred on the envelope glycoproteins of a laboratory-adapted HIV-1 isolate (HXBc2) by replacing the gp120 V3 loop or V1/V2 and V3 loops with those of the YU2 virus. Infection by the YU2 virus in the presence of activating antibodies remained inhibitable by macrophage inhibitory protein 1β, indicating dependence on the CCR5 coreceptor on the target cells. Thus, antibody enhancement of YU2 entry involves neither Fc receptor binding nor envelope glycoprotein cross-linking, is determined by the same variable loops that dictate enhancement by sCD4, and probably proceeds by a process fundamentally similar to the receptor-activated virus entry pathway.     

Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies Block Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection of Dendritic Cells and Transmission to T Cells

Prevention of the initial infection of mucosal dendritic cells (DC) and interruption of the subsequent transmission of HIV-1 from DC to T cells are likely to be important attributes of an effective human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine. While anti-HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies have been difficult to elicit by immunization, there are several human monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) that effectively neutralize virus infection of activated T cells. We investigated the ability of three well-characterized neutralizing MAbs (IgG1b12, 2F5, and 2G12) to block HIV-1 infection of human DC. DC were generated from CD14⁺ blood cells or obtained from cadaveric human skin. The MAbs prevented viral entry into purified DC and the ensuing productive infection in DC/T-cell cultures. When DC were first pulsed with HIV-1, MAbs blocked the subsequent transmission to unstimulated CD3⁺ T cells. Thus, neutralizing antibodies can block HIV-1 infection of DC and the cell-to-cell transmission of virus from infected DC to T cells. These data suggest that neutralizing antibodies could interrupt the initial events associated with mucosal transmission and regional spread of HIV-1.     

Induction and Characterization of Neutralizing Antibodies against a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Primary Isolate

Chimpanzees infected with the primary isolate DH012 mount potent neutralizing antibodies. This DH012 neutralizing activity is highly strain specific. Immune sera from guinea pigs immunized with recombinant DH012 gp120 could also neutralize this primary isolate. The neutralizing activity in chimpanzee and guinea pig sera against wild-type DH012 appears to be independent of a linear epitope in the V3 region of gp120. Interestingly, the neutralization escape mutant derived from growing DH012 in the presence of the potent neutralizing chimpanzee serum is at least 50-fold more sensitive than wild-type DH012 to neutralization by guinea pig immune sera. The unusually potent neutralizing activity against the DH012 neutralization-resistant virus is due to the presence of anti-V3 antibodies in guinea pig sera. These results suggested that recombinant gp120 could induce neutralizing antibodies against primary isolate DH012. The V3 of wild-type DH012 is poorly immunogenic in infected chimpanzees and is not accessible to neutralizing V3 antibodies. It is likely that this cryptic V3 region became exposed when the virus escaped the neutralizing activity of the chimpanzee serum.     

Broadly Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies 2F5 and 4E10 Directed against the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp41 Membrane-Proximal External Region Protect against Mucosal Challenge by Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus SHIVBa-L

The membrane-proximal external region (MPER) of HIV-1, located at the C terminus of the gp41 ectodomain, is conserved and crucial for viral fusion. Three broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (bnMAbs), 2F5, 4E10, and Z13e1, are directed against linear epitopes mapped to the MPER, making this conserved region an important potential vaccine target. However, no MPER antibodies have been definitively shown to provide protection against HIV challenge. Here, we show that both MAbs 2F5 and 4E10 can provide complete protection against mucosal simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) challenge in macaques. MAb 2F5 or 4E10 was administered intravenously at 50 mg/kg to groups of six male Indian rhesus macaques 1 day prior to and again 1 day following intrarectal challenge with SHIV_Ba-L. In both groups, five out of six animals showed complete protection and sterilizing immunity, while for one animal in each group a low level of viral replication following challenge could not be ruled out. The study confirms the protective potential of 2F5 and 4E10 and supports emphasis on HIV immunogen design based on the MPER region of gp41.Eliciting broadly neutralizing antibodies is an important goal of HIV vaccine design efforts, and the study of broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (bnMAbs) can assist in that goal. Human bnMAbs against both gp120 and gp41 of the HIV-1 envelope spike have been described. Three bnMAbs to gp41, 2F5, 4E10, and Z13e1, have been identified and shown to recognize neighboring linear epitopes on the membrane proximal external (MPER) region of gp41 (3, 24, 25, 37, 47). In a comprehensive cross-clade neutralization study by Binley et al., 2F5 neutralized 67% and 4E10 neutralized 100% of a diverse panel of 90 primary isolates (2). Similar broad neutralization was seen against sexually transmitted isolates cloned from acutely infected patients (22). More recently, a comprehensive study showed that 2F5 neutralized 97 isolates from a 162-virus panel (60%) and that 4E10 neutralized 159 isolates (98%) (41). Although less potent, the monoclonal antibody Z13, isolated from an antibody phage display library derived from a bone marrow donor whose serum was broadly neutralizing (47), has cross-clade neutralizing activity. Z13e1 is an affinity-enhanced variant of the earlier-characterized MAb Z13 that is directed against an access-restricted epitope between and overlapping the epitopes of 2F5 and 4E10. Both MAbs 2F5 and 4E10 were originally obtained as IgG3 antibodies in hybridomas derived from peripheral blood mononuclear blood lymphocytes (PBMCs) of HIV-1-seropositive nonsymptomatic patients and were later class switched to IgG1 to enable large-scale manufacturing and to prolong in vivo half-life (3, 6, 32).Despite the interest in the MPER as a vaccine target, there is limited information on the ability of MPER antibodies to act antivirally in vivo either in established infection or prophylactically. A study using the huPBL-SCID mouse model showed limited impact from 2F5 when the antibody was administered in established infection (31). Passive administration of 2G12, 2F5, and 4E10 to a cohort of acutely and chronically infected HIV-1 patients provided little direct evidence of 2F5 or 4E10 antiviral activity, whereas the emergence of escape variants indicated unequivocally the ability of 2G12 to act antivirally (18, 39). Indirect evidence did, however, suggest that the MPER MAbs may have affected virus replication, as indicated by viral rebound suppression in a patient known to have a 2G12-resistant virus prior to passive immunization (39). Another study of 10 individuals passively administered 2G12, 2F5, and 4E10 before and after cessation of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) showed similarly that 2G12 treatment could delay viral rebound, but antiviral activity by 2F5 and 4E10 was not clearly demonstrated (21). In prophylaxis, an early 2F5 passive transfer study with chimpanzees suggested that the antibody could delay or lower the magnitude of primary viremia following HIV-1 challenge (7). A study using gene transfer of 2F5 in a humanized SCID mouse model suggested that continuous plasma levels of approximately 1 μg/ml of 2F5 may significantly reduce viral loads in LAI- and MN-challenged mice (34). Protection studies of rhesus macaques using simian-human immunodeficiency virus SHIV_89.6PD challenge did not provide definitive direct evidence for MPER antibody-mediated protection. One of three animals was protected against intravenous (i.v.) challenge when 2F5 was administered in a cocktail with HIVIG and 2G12 (19), but all three animals treated with 2F5 alone at high concentration became infected. In a vaginal challenge study with SHIV_89.6PD (20), four of five animals were protected with a cocktail of HIVIG, 2F5, and 2G12, but a 2F5/2G12 combination protected only two of five animals. Further protection studies have used MPER MAbs in combination with other MAbs, leaving the individual contributions of these antibodies uncertain (1, 8).In our previous studies, we successfully used the SHIV/macaque model to demonstrate neutralizing antibody protection against mucosal challenge, and we have begun to explore how that protection is achieved (12, 30). Here, we conducted a protection study with the two broadly neutralizing MPER-directed antibodies 2F5 and 4E10. We show that the antibodies can prevent viral infection and thereby support the MPER as a vaccine target.     

Identification and Characterization of Broadly Neutralizing Human Monoclonal Antibodies Directed against the E2 Envelope Glycoprotein of Hepatitis C Virus

Nearly all livers transplanted into hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients become infected with HCV, and 10 to 25% of reinfected livers develop cirrhosis within 5 years. Neutralizing monoclonal antibody could be an effective therapy for the prevention of infection in a transplant setting. To pursue this treatment modality, we developed human monoclonal antibodies (HuMAbs) directed against the HCV E2 envelope glycoprotein and assessed the capacity of these HuMAbs to neutralize a broad panel of HCV genotypes. HuMAb antibodies were generated by immunizing transgenic mice containing human antibody genes (HuMAb mice; Medarex Inc.) with soluble E2 envelope glycoprotein derived from a genotype 1a virus (H77). Two HuMAbs, HCV1 and 95-2, were selected for further study based on initial cross-reactivity with soluble E2 glycoproteins derived from genotypes 1a and 1b, as well as neutralization of lentivirus pseudotyped with HCV 1a and 1b envelope glycoproteins. Additionally, HuMAbs HCV1 and 95-2 potently neutralized pseudoviruses from all genotypes tested (1a, 1b, 2b, 3a, and 4a). Epitope mapping with mammalian and bacterially expressed proteins, as well as synthetic peptides, revealed that HuMAbs HCV1 and 95-2 recognize a highly conserved linear epitope spanning amino acids 412 to 423 of the E2 glycoprotein. The capacity to recognize and neutralize a broad range of genotypes, the highly conserved E2 epitope, and the fully human nature of the antibodies make HuMAbs HCV1 and 95-2 excellent candidates for treatment of HCV-positive individuals undergoing liver transplantation.Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of liver failure and infects more than 170 million people worldwide. HCV is a member of the Flaviviridae family and contains a 9.6-kb positive-strand RNA genome. The genome is translated into a single polypeptide that is cleaved by viral and cellular proteases into at least nine different proteins. The major HCV surface glycoproteins, E1 and E2, form a noncovalent heterodimer on the virion surface (23) and are believed to mediate viral entry via a complex set of poorly understood interactions with cellular coreceptors, including CD81 (28), claudin-1 (8), occludin (29), scavenger receptor class B type I (30), and others (38). The E2 glycoprotein has been shown to interact directly with receptors (38); currently, no function has been assigned to E1, although it is known to be required for viral infection. These viral glycoproteins provide an obvious target for neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs).Isolation of potently neutralizing HCV-specific MAbs has been complicated by the lack of an in vitro cell culture system to study the full infection cycle of the virus. Recently, systems have been developed that allow for the generation of infectious viral particles, highlighting the importance of E1 and E2 in viral binding and entry. A novel in vitro infection system employs HCV pseudotyped viral particles (HCVpp) generated from a lentivirus that are devoid of native glycoproteins and engineered to contain HCV glycoproteins E1 and E2 (4, 15). HCVpp specifically infect cell lines derived from human liver cells and can be neutralized by polyclonal and MAbs directed against the HCV envelope glycoproteins.HCVpp have allowed the identification of antibodies that can neutralize HCV infection in cell culture. E1 has proven to be a difficult target for MAb-mediated neutralization, possibly because it appears to have low immunogenicity (32), has no identified binding proteins on the cell surface, and has an undefined role in cell entry. Despite this challenge, two groups have identified HCV neutralizing MAbs directed to E1: these MAbs are H-111, which has moderate neutralizing activity (17), and the recently isolated IGH505 and IGH526, which neutralize numerous HCV genotypes (1a, 1b, 2a, 4a, 5a, and 6a but not 2b and 3a) (22). Although they are predicted to inhibit viral binding or fusion, the mechanism by which these E1-directed MAbs neutralize HCV infection is unclear.A diverse group of mouse anti-E2 antibodies, recognizing both linear and discontinuous epitopes, has been generated. Many of these MAbs showed broad neutralization of multiple HCV genotypes, but not surprisingly, several HCV isolates were refractory to neutralization. In contrast, AP33, a mouse MAb that largely recognizes a highly conserved linear epitope in the N terminus of E2 (amino acids 412 to 423), was identified as a broadly cross-reactive antibody that neutralized strains from all genotypes tested (1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 4, 5, and 6), with the exception of one genotype 5 virus (UKN5.14.4; GenBank accession no. {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AY894682","term_id":"58220837","term_text":"AY894682"}}AY894682) (24). Recently, several cross-reactive neutralizing MAbs have been identified that are of human origin and have the capacity to neutralize a significant fraction of the genotypes tested (1, 5, 12, 13, 27, 31) or to neutralize all genotypes tested (16, 20, 25). As with the vast majority of previously described human MAbs (HuMAbs), these MAbs recognize conformation-dependent epitopes of E2. One broadly neutralizing human antibody, AR3B, was tested in a mouse model of infection and showed significant protection from viremia (20). Given the known function of the E2 envelope glycoprotein, the high level of immunogenicity, the surface vulnerability, and the abundance of data pertaining to E2 and HCV neutralization, E2 provides a promising target for the development of fully human neutralizing antibodies.Liver deterioration due to HCV infection is the leading reason for liver transplantation in the United States. Unfortunately, it is highly likely that the transplanted liver will also become infected with HCV, and 10 to 25% of these patients develop cirrhosis within 5 years of transplant (9, 40). Here we describe the characterization of HuMAbs directed against the HCV E2 envelope glycoprotein, generated using transgenic mice. Based on epitope conservation and broad neutralization capacity, HuMAbs HCV1 and 95-2 provide excellent candidates for prevention of graft reinfection of HCV-infected individuals undergoing liver transplantation.     

Cytotoxic T Cells from Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2-Infected Patients Frequently Cross-React with Different Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Clades

Knowledge of immune mechanisms responsible for the cross-protection between highly divergent viruses such as human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 may contribute to an understanding of whether virus variability may be overcome in the design of vaccine candidates which are broadly protective across the HIV subtypes. We demonstrate that despite the significant difference in virus amino acid sequence, the majority of HIV-2-infected individuals with different HLA molecules possess a dominant cytotoxic T-cell response which is able to recognize HIV-1 Gag protein. Furthermore, HLA-B5801-positive subjects show broad cross-recognition of HIV-1 subtypes since they mounted a T-cell response that tolerated extensive amino acid substitutions within HLA-B5801-restricted HIV-1 and HIV-2 epitopes. These results suggests that HLA-B5801-positive HIV-2-infected individuals have an enhanced ability to react with HIV-1 that could play a role in cross-protection.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 are related human retroviruses that show various biological and structural differences. HIV-2 is found mainly in West Africa, whereas HIV-1 is spreading throughout the world. HIV-2 is less transmissible, and HIV-2-positive patients exhibit longer clinical latency periods than individuals infected with HIV-1 (23). A recent report has also shown that the mortality in HIV-2-infected individuals is only twice as high as in the uninfected population and, in the majority of adults, survival is not affected by HIV-2 status (31).Although the two viruses are similar in genomic organization, various genetic and enzymatic differences have been found at many stages of the retroviral life cycle. They differ significantly in terms of amino acid sequence, the more conserved being the Pol and Gag sequences, which exhibit less than 60% homology (17).Despite these differences, epidemiological data and animal studies have shown some evidence of cross-protection between the two viral infections. Travers et al. reported that HIV-2-infected women had a lower incidence of HIV-1 infection than did HIV-seronegative women in a cohort of commercial sexual workers in Dakar (37), and rhesus macaques immunized with a recombinant HIV-1 poxvirus vaccine are protected against HIV-2 challenge (2). These studies, though not conclusive (1, 6), suggest that differences in the virus may not necessarily preclude the development of defensive immunity to a subsequent pathogenic infection, an old-fashioned concept pioneered by Jenner, who used cowpox to vaccinate against human smallpox.The immunological basis of cross-protection is largely unknown, and a clear understanding of the role played by the humoral or cell-mediated immune response in HIV protection is still lacking. However, mounting evidence suggests that cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) response could be the key element. Indeed, the protection afforded in animal models against simian (13) and feline (12) immunodeficiency virus infections is closely correlated with the induction of specific CTL response, and HIV-1 and HIV-2 HLA-B35-restricted cross-reactive CTLs have been postulated to confer protection against repeated HIV exposure (33).CTLs recognize short viral peptides, 8 to 11 amino acids long, that are generated by the intracellular processing of endogenously synthesized viral antigens within the infected cells, which are expressed at the cell surface in the binding groove of HLA class I molecules. The specificity of the T-cell response is determined by the interaction of the antigen-specific T-cell receptor (TCR) with the peptide-HLA complex, and this interaction, together with non-antigen-specific signals, activates the CTLs (15).The presence of cross-reactive CTLs able to lyse HIV-1- or HIV-2-infected cells should be dependent on the extent of conservation between the two viruses within the epitopes selected by particular HLA class I molecules. It is well known that amino acid substitutions within the epitopes can abrogate the CTL response by inhibiting either HLA binding or TCR recognition (32). However, a number of recent studies have shown that T cells can recognize apparently unrelated peptides (10, 41), and crystallographic data have shown physical limits to the TCR epitope specificity due to the limited size of contact between the TCR and the peptide (14), suggesting a flexibility in T-cell recognition of antigen (19).Some individuals with a particular HLA profile which is responsible for presentation of the viral antigen and for selection of the T-cell repertoire may possess a CTL response not affected by mutations within the epitope, as has been demonstrated in subjects with HLA alleles B27 (28) and B35 (33). In these cases, amino acid substitutions within the HIV-1 and -2 epitopes were tolerated by the CTLs.In this study, we have investigated the extent of cross-reacting CTLs between HIV-2 and HIV-1 in a group of HIV-2-infected subjects with different HLA class I types. We have shown that despite differences in amino acid sequence between the two viruses, the majority of HIV-2-positive subjects possess CTLs which are able to recognize HIV-1 Gag protein.Furthermore, analysis of HLA profiles and the fine specificity of the cytotoxic response demonstrated that HLA-B5801-positive subjects show broad cross-recognition of HIV-1 isolates. These subjects mounted a CTL response that tolerated extensive amino acid substitutions within an HLA-B5801-restricted HIV-1 epitope.     

Quaternary Epitope Specificities of Anti-HIV-1 Neutralizing Antibodies Generated in Rhesus Macaques Infected by the Simian/Human Immunodeficiency Virus SHIVSF162P4

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) that neutralize human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) have been isolated from HIV-1-infected individuals or animals immunized with recombinant HIV-1 envelope (Env) glycoprotein constructs. The epitopes of these neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were shown to be located on either the variable or conserved regions of the HIV-1 Env and to be linear or conformational. However, one neutralizing MAb, 2909, which was isolated from an HIV-1-infected subject, recognizes a more complex, quaternary epitope that is present on the virion-associated functional trimeric Env spike of the SF162 HIV-1 isolate. Here, we discuss the isolation of 11 anti-HIV NAbs that were isolated from three rhesus macaques infected with the simian/human immunodeficiency virus SHIV_SF162P4 and that also recognize quaternary epitopes. A detailed epitope mapping analysis of three of these rhesus antibodies revealed that their epitopes overlap that of the human MAb 2909. Despite this overall similarity in binding, however, differences in specific amino acid and glycosylation pattern requirements for MAb 2909 and the rhesus MAbs were identified. These results highlight similarities in the B-cell responses of humans and macaques to structurally complex neutralization epitopes on related viruses, HIV-1 and SHIV.HIV-1 infection typically elicits high levels of antibodies directed against the viral surface envelope (Env) glycoprotein, gp160. The initial anti-Env antibody response is nonneutralizing (28), but within 1 or 2 months after infection, neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) emerge which tend to be highly strain specific for the autologous virus and exhibit little or no neutralizing activity against heterologous HIV-1 strains (10, 22). However, several recent reports have indicated that approximately 25% of HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral-naïve patients develop broad cross-neutralizing antibody responses (5, 23, 26). In some cases, these broad neutralizing antibody responses can be mapped to the CD4-binding site of Env while in most cases a single epitope specificity cannot be identified to recapitulate the neutralizing breadth of the corresponding plasma (1, 4, 14, 15, 23, 25). Detailed analyses of the epitope specificities of broad plasma neutralizing antibody responses performed by several groups revealed the presence in HIV-positive (HIV⁺) plasmas of NAbs with as yet undefined epitope specificities (1, 15, 18, 23). It is possible that these undefined specificities include quaternary neutralizing epitopes (QNEs) and/or sugar molecules which coat the HIV Env spike expressed on the surface of viral particles.The human monoclonal antibody (MAb) 2909 recognizes a QNE present on the oligomeric Env spike present on the surface of HIV-1 SF162 virions (8). MAb 2909 can bind and neutralize SF162 virions but does not bind to the corresponding soluble SF162 Env. The binding of MAb 2909 to its QNE depends on the presence of the second and third variable regions of gp120 (the V2 and V3 loops, respectively). One particular amino acid at the amino terminal side of the V2 loop (K at position 158, based on the SF162 numbering, or position 160, based on the strain HxB2 numbering) appears to be critical for its binding (11). MAb 2909 was isolated from a person who was not infected with SF162, but a virus isolated from the donor of MAb 2909 bears a V2 loop with similarities to that of SF162 and, in particular, possesses the same K158 residue (M. K. Gorny, unpublished data). More recently, two additional human MAbs, PG9 and PG16, were isolated from a subject infected with clade A HIV-1 and were shown to bind to a QNE that also includes the V2 and V3 loops (30). In contrast, however, to the narrow neutralizing potential of MAb 2909, MAbs PG9 and PG16 display far broader neutralizing abilities.Similar to the infection of humans by HIV-1, chronic infection of rhesus macaques by simian/human immunodeficiency viruses (SHIVs) or chimpanzees by HIV-1 also results in the elicitation of potent NAbs against the autologous virus and, to a much lesser extent, against heterologous SHIV isolates or HIV-1 viruses (3, 6, 12, 17). Here, we describe a panel of MAbs from SHIV_SF162P4-infected rhesus macaques that demonstrates extremely potent neutralization against the homologous virus (that expresses the same Env as HIV-1 SF162) and that recognizes QNEs present on the surface of intact virions. Similar to the human MAbs 2909, PG9, and PG16, these rhesus macaque monoclonal antibodies (RhMAbs) recognize QNEs that include the V2 and V3 loops. Also, similar to MAb 2909, the RhMAbs neutralize only viruses expressing the SF162 Env. Consequently, we compared the fine epitope specificities of these RhMAbs to the epitope specificity of the human MAb 2909. Our detailed epitope mapping analysis reveals that although the human MAb 2909 and the RhMAbs recognize that same overall Env complex region, their specific requirements for binding differ. Thus, these studies of human and rhesus MAbs indicate that infection of humans and rhesus macaques with viruses expressing distinct Envs can result in the elicitation of antibodies that bind to overlapping conserved quaternary epitopes.     

Study of the V3 Loop as a Target Epitope for Antibodies Involved in the Neutralization of Primary Isolates versus T-Cell-Line-Adapted Strains of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

Previous studies characterized the third variable (V3) loop of the envelope gp120 as the principal neutralizing determinant for laboratory T-cell-line-adapted (TCLA) strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). However, primary viruses isolated from infected individuals are more refractory to neutralization than TCLA strains, suggesting that qualitatively different neutralizing antibodies may be involved. In this study, we investigated whether the V3 loop constitutes a linear target epitope for antibodies neutralizing primary isolates. By using peptides representative of the V3 regions of various primary isolates, an early, relatively specific and persistent antibody response was detected in sera from HIV-infected patients. To assess the relationship between these antibodies and neutralization, the same peptides were used in competition and depletion experiments. Addition of homologous V3 peptides led to a competitive inhibition in the neutralization of the TCLA strain HIV_MN/MT-4 but had no effect on the neutralization of the autologous primary isolate. Similarly, the removal of antibodies that bind to linear V3 epitopes resulted in a loss of HIV_MN/MT-4 neutralization, whereas no decrease in the autologous neutralization was measured. The different roles of V3-specific antibodies according to the virus considered were thereby brought to light. This confirmed the involvement of V3 antibodies in the neutralization of a TCLA strain but emphasized a more pronounced contribution of either conformational epitopes or epitopes outside the V3 loop as targets for antibodies neutralizing primary HIV-1 isolates. This result underlines the need to focus on new vaccinal immunogens with epitopes able to induce broadly reactive and efficient antibodies that neutralize a wide range of primary HIV-1 isolates.     

Vaccine-Induced Linear Epitope-Specific Antibodies to Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVmac239 Envelope Are Distinct from Those Induced to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope in Nonhuman Primates

To evaluate antibody specificities induced by simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) versus human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope antigens in nonhuman primate (NHP), we profiled binding antibody responses to linear epitopes in NHP studies with HIV-1 or SIV immunogens. We found that, overall, HIV-1 Env IgG responses were dominated by V3, with the notable exception of the responses to the vaccine strain A244 Env that were dominated by V2, whereas the anti-SIVmac239 Env responses were dominated by V2 regardless of the vaccine regimen.     

HIV-1的表型及其感染的细胞嗜性

HIV-1的表型分为合胞体诱导型(syncytium-inducing,SI)和非合胞体诱导型(non-syncytium-inducing,NSI)。依据所用辅助受体和感染靶细胞的不同,HIV-1又被分为R5、X4和R5X4型。R5和X4型病毒分别利用CCR5和CXCR4作为辅助受体,而R5X4型病毒可利用这两种辅助受体。在病毒的复制力、细胞嗜性以及合胞体诱导能力上,SI型与X4型病毒一致,NSI型与R5型病毒一致。在HIV-1感染过程中,疾病的发展伴随着病毒从NSI型向SI型、及R5型向X4型的转变。HIV-1的表型影响和决定着HIV-1的感染、传播及AIDS的疾病进程。HIV-1的表型和细胞嗜性主要由病毒gp120的V3区(特别是第11和25位的氨基酸)决定。V3区的氨基酸序列信息,将为预测HIV-1的表型,以及病毒感染后的疾病进程提供生物信息学的依据。     

Neutralizing Antibody Responses in Macaques Induced by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Monovalent or Trivalent Envelope Glycoproteins

A major goal of efforts to develop a vaccine to prevent HIV-1 infection is induction of broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies (bcnAb). In previous studies we have demonstrated induction of neutralizing antibodies that did cross-react among multiple primary and laboratory strains of HIV-1, but neutralized with limited potency. In the present study we tested the hypothesis that immunization with multiple HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins (Envs) would result in a more potent and cross-reactive neutralizing response. One Env, CM243(N610Q), was selected on the basis of studies of the effects of single and multiple mutations of the four gp41 glycosylation sites. The other two Envs included R2 (subtype B) and 14/00/4 (subtype F), both of which were obtained from donors with bcnAb. Rhesus monkeys were immunized using a prime boost regimen as in previous studies. Individual groups of monkeys were immunized with either one of the three Envs or all three. The single N610Q and N615Q mutations of CM243 Env did not disrupt protein secretion, processing into, or reactivity with mAbs, unlike other single or multiple deglycosylation mutations. In rabbit studies the N610Q mutation alone or in combination was associated with an enhanced neutralizing response against homologous and heterologous subtype E viruses. In the subsequent monkey study the response induced by the R2 Env regimen was equivalent to the trivalent regimen and superior to the other monovalent regimens against the virus panel used for testing. The 14/00/4 Env induced responses superior to CM243(N610Q). The results indicate that elimination of the glycosylation site near the gp41 loop results in enhanced immunogenicity, but that immunization of monkeys with these three distinct Envs was not more immunogenic than with one.     

Transgenic Mice Expressing Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in Immune Cells Develop a Severe AIDS-Like Disease

We have constructed transgenic (Tg) mice expressing the entire human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) coding sequences in cells targeted by HIV-1 infection in humans. These Tg mice developed a severe AIDS-like disease leading to early death (<1 month). They developed muscle wasting, severe atrophy and fibrosis of lymphoid organs, tubulointerstitial nephritis, and lymphoid interstitial pneumonitis. In addition the expression of RANTES was increased in various tissues of these Tg mice relative to that in the normal controls. Disease appearance was correlated with the levels of transgene expression. The numerous pathologies observed in these mice are remarkably similar to those observed in human AIDS and, more specifically, in pediatric AIDS.     

A Conformation-Specific Monoclonal Antibody Reacting with Fusion-Active gp41 from the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Glycoprotein

The gp41 subunit of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein plays a major role in the membrane fusion step of viral infection. The ectodomain of gp41 contains a six-helix structural domain that likely represents the core of the fusion-active conformation of the molecule. A monoclonal antibody (MAb), designated NC-1, was generated and cloned from a mouse immunized with the model polypeptide N36(L6)C34, which folds into a stable six-helix bundle. NC-1 binds specifically to both the α-helical core domain and the oligomeric forms of gp41. This conformation-dependent reactivity is dramatically reduced by point mutations within the N-terminal coiled-coil region of gp41 which impede formation of the gp41 core. NC-1 binds to the surfaces of HIV-1-infected cells only in the presence of soluble CD4. These results indicate that NC-1 is capable of reacting with fusion-active gp41 in a conformation-specific manner and can be used as a valuable biological reagent for studying the receptor-induced conformational changes in gp41 required for membrane fusion and HIV-1 infection.