Antifungal agents: mechanisms of action

Clinical needs for novel antifungal agents have altered steadily with the rise and fall of AIDS-related mycoses, and the change in spectrum of fatal disseminated fungal infections that has accompanied changes in therapeutic immunosuppressive therapies. The search for new molecular targets for antifungals has generated considerable research using modern genomic approaches, so far without generating new agents for clinical use. Meanwhile, six new antifungal agents have just reached, or are approaching, the clinic. Three are new triazoles, with extremely broad antifungal spectra, and three are echinocandins, which inhibit synthesis of fungal cell wall polysaccharides--a new mode of action. In addition, the sordarins represent a novel class of agents that inhibit fungal protein synthesis. This review describes the targets and mechanisms of action of all classes of antifungal agents in clinical use or with clinical potential.     

Antifungal Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

A growing body of evidence suggests that patient-to-patient variability in the pharmacokinetics of some antifungals, particularly the mold-active triazoles (itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole) may contribute to therapeutic failure or unexpected toxicity. As a result, many clinicians have recognized a need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to individualize drug dosing in select patients with suspected or documented invasive fungal infections. However, approaches for performing and interpreting plasma concentrations are not well standardized, and logistical issues such as the turnaround time of test results can limit the clinical usefulness of testing in acutely ill patients. This article summarizes the pharmacologic rationale for TDM of antifungal agents, with a particular focus on recently published data for the newer triazoles, voriconazole and posaconazole. Practical recommendations for TDM-guided dosing are also provided, based on a critical evaluation of literature published over the past 5 years.     

AmBisome,tres retos: infección por Candida auris,infección del sistema nervioso central e infección asociada a biopelículas

The treatment of invasive fungal infections remains a challenge, both for the diagnosis and for the need of providing the appropriate antifungal therapy. Candida auris is a pathogenic yeast that is responsible for hospital outbreaks, especially in intensive care units; it is characterized by a high resistance to the antifungal agents and can become multidrug-resistant. At present, the recommended antifungal agents for the invasive infections with this pathogen are echinocandins, always after carrying out an antifungal susceptibility testing. In case of no clinical response or persistent candidemia, the addition of liposomal amphotericin B or isavuconazole may be considered. Both fungal infection of the central nervous system and that associated with biomedical devices remain rare entities affecting mainly immunocompromised patients. However, an increase in their incidence in recent years, along with high morbidity and mortality, has been shown. The treatment of these infections is conditioned by the limited knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of antifungals. A better understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of the different antifungals is essential to determine the efficacy of the antifungal agents in the treatment of these infections.     

Using Antifungal Pharmacodynamics to Improve Patient Outcomes

In vitro and in vivo studies of available and investigational antifungals have broadened our understanding of the pharmacodynamics of these agents as well as the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics that are associated with efficacy. These data are increasingly being used as surrogate means to answer questions about dosing and administration of antimicrobial agents in order to improve outcomes in patients with invasive fungal infections, as these questions are difficult to answer in clinical trials. The objective of this article is to review the pharmacodynamic activity of widely used classes of antifungal agents, including the azoles, amphotericin B, and the echinocandins, discuss the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters associated with efficacy of these agents in preclinical studies, and describe how this information is being translated into the clinical arena to optimize patient outcomes.     

Diagnosis of Candidemia

Patients with invasive fungal infections still have high morbidity and mortality despite an increasing number of antifungals and other therapies. Because of this problem, an accurate and rapid diagnosis is mandatory in order to improve clinical outcome in these patients. In this paper we review the tools for the diagnosis of candidemia, including blood culture systems, chromogenic media, commercial kits for species identification, and newer technologies for the diagnosis of candidemia such as MALDI-TOF, PNA FISH and the T2 system.     

Antifungal Dosing in Critically Ill Patients

This article reviews appropriate dosing for antifungals and emphasizes factors specific to the critically ill patient, along with drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The rationale for doses of the echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin), triazoles (fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole), amphotericin B (including lipid formulations), and flucytosine are discussed.     

Aerosolized Antifungals for the Prevention and Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections

Invasive fungal infections result in significant morbidity and mortality, most notably in immunosuppressed patients. Aerosolized antifungal agents have been utilized primarily as prophylaxis (either alone or in combination with systemic antifungals) in patients at highest risk of invasive infections in attempts to optimize drug delivery while minimizing the potential for systemic toxicity and/or drug interactions. Published clinical experience with aerosolized antifungals most frequently involves various formulations of the polyene amphotericin B in patients undergoing lung transplantation and/or select patients with hematologic malignancy. Adverse events are infrequent and generally limited to dyspnea, dysgeusia, and cough. Existing data suggests lipid-based amphotericin B formulations may be better tolerated than amphotericin B deoxycholate. Published clinical experience with aerosolized antifungals as adjunctive treatment of invasive fungal infections is limited to case reports. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support use of aerosolized echinocandins and azoles in clinical practice. Outstanding questions regarding comparative efficacy, optimal dose, duration and drug delivery present a continuing challenge when utilizing these agents in clinical practice.     

In vitro antifungal activities of anidulafungin and micafungin, licensed agents and the investigational triazole posaconazole as determined by NCCLS methods for 12,052 fungal isolates: review of the literature

The echinocandins anidulafungin and micafungin and the triazole posaconazole are currently undergoing phase III clinical trials. Caspofungin and voriconazole have recently been licensed for the treatment of aspergillosis (both agents), other less common mould (voriconazole) and candidal (caspofungin) infections. This review summarizes the published in vitro data obtained by NCCLS or NCCLS modified methods on the in vitro fungistatic and fungicidal activities of these five agents for yeasts and moulds in comparison to the established agents, amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, and flucytosine. Among the yeasts, the echinocandins have less activity for Candida parapsilosis and Candida guilliermondii, no activity for Cryptococcus neoformans and Trichosporon spp., but good fungistatic and fungicidal activity in vivo and in vitro for most of the other Candida spp.; this fungicidal activity has been reported by minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) or time kill curve results. The new triazoles exhibit good fungistatic activity (but not fungicidal) for most Candida spp., C. neoformans, and Trichosporon spp. For the Aspergillus spp. evaluated, the echinocandins have similar or better fungistatic activity than those of amphotericin B and the triazoles, but fungicidal activity has been demonstrated only with amphotericin B and the triazoles, with the exception of fluconazole. Most studies showed posaconazole and voriconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 0.25 to 8 microg/ml for non-solani Fusarium spp., while MIC and minimum effective concentration (MEC) endpoints of the echinocandins were >8 microg/ml. The fungistatic activity of the triazoles is also superior to that of the echinocandins for most of the dimorphic fungi and the Zygomycetes. However, micafungin has activity for the mould phase of most dimorphic fungi, but not for the parasitic or yeast phase of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. The echinocandins appear to have variable and species dependent fungistatic activity for the dematiaceous fungi, but all agents have poor or no activity against most isolates of Scedosporium prolificans. Only amphotericin B exhibit good fungistatic activity against the Zygomycetes. The combination of caspofungin with some triazoles, amphotericin B or liposomal amphotericin B has been synergistic in vitro, in animal models and in patients. Breakpoints are not available for any mould and antifungal agent combination. In vitro/in vivo correlations should aid in the interpretation of these results, but standard testing conditions are needed for the echinocandins, especially for mould testing, to obtain reliable results.     

Antifungal activity of nontraditional antifungal agents

Invasive fungal infections are becoming increasingly important in the management of critically ill and immunocompromised patients. As organ and stem cell transplantation becomes more prominent and immune therapies are employed for diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and plaque psoriasis, the population of patients at risk continues to grow. Many invasive fungal infections are associated with extremely high mortality rates. Antifungal options are limited and novel therapies are intriguing as we attempt to improve patient outcomes and preserve the antifungal armamentarium. Many other classes of pharmaceuticals typically seen as non-antifungal do in fact have significant antifungal activity. Prominent among these are calcineurin inhibitors, antiarrhythmics, antidepressants, antibacterials, and others. Some have activity alone and some augment the activity of conventional antifungals. Unfortunately, clinical data are lacking for most of these agents and their role in therapy remains undefined. This review focuses on several representative non-antifungal agents with antifungal activity.     

Fungal endocarditis

Recent advances in medicine have caused fungal endocarditis (FE) to be a more common disease entity. A list of fungi is expanding as potential pathogens in FE, with Candida species and Aspergillus species being the most common. The combination of valvular heart disease along with indwelling devices and antibiotic use are the major predisposing factors for yeast endocarditis, whereas the presence of immunosuppression along with valvulopathy predisposes for mold endocarditis. The expanding population of immunosuppresed patients and individuals with intravascular devices has led to increased incidence of FE. Better outcome of FE depends on fast and accurate diagnosis and subsequent treatment. Echocardiography the most valuable recent technique allowed for early diagnosis of FE and is probably responsible for the improved prognosis of patients with FE. Nonculture-based diagnostic tests may further improve the sensitivity, specificity, and rapidity of microbiologic diagnosis of FE. The availability of the newer triazoles and echinocandins, providing broad spectrum antifungal activities with favorable safety profile may assist in achieving cure and further improving the prognosis of this disease entity.     

Fungal endophthalmitis

Fungal endophthalmitis occurs secondary to trauma, as a complication of intraocular surgery, or as an extension of an adjacent or distant focus of fungal infection. In the United States, Candida species are the most common pathogens isolated, followed by Aspergillus species. Candida infections show a predilection towards vitreous involvement, whereas Aspergillus infections usually manifest as hemorrhagic infarcts of the retinal or choroidal vessels or as infiltration of the subretinal and subretinal pigment epithelial spaces. Endogenous Aspergillus endophthalmitis is associated with a high mortality rate, underscoring the severity of systemic infection. The prognosis of fungal endophthalmitis depends on the virulence of the organism, extent of intraocular involvement, and the timing and mode of interventions. Prompt therapy following early diagnosis helps to reduce significant visual loss. Despite the introduction of new-generation triazoles and echinocandins into clinical practice, successful therapy is limited by the delay in diagnosis and a lack of broad-spectrum antifungals with good intravitreal penetration that lack systemic toxicity.     

Update on Antifungal Resistance and its Clinical Impact

Candida and Aspergillus species are important causes of opportunistic infection in an ever-growing number of vulnerable patients, and these infections are associated with high mortality. This has partly been attributed to the emerging resistance of pathogenic fungi to antifungal therapy, which potentially compromises the management of infected patients. Multi-azole resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus is a current health problem, as well as is the co-resistance of Candida glabrata to both azoles and echinocandins. In most cases, negative clinical consequences of reduced in vitro fungal susceptibility to azoles and/or echinocandins can be traced to acquisition of particular resistance mechanisms. While strategies using antifungal combinations or adjunctive agents that maximize the efficacy of existing antifungals may limit treatment failures, new therapeutic approaches, including antifungal agents with novel mechanisms of action, are urgent. In the meantime, more efforts should be devoted to close monitoring of antifungal resistance and its evolution in the clinical setting.     

Antifungal activity of immunosuppressants used alone or in combination with fluconazole

Fungal infections remain a challenge to clinicians due to the limited available antifungals. With the increasing use of antifungals in clinical practice, drug resistance has been emerging continuously, especially to fluconazole (FLC). Thus, a search for new antifungals and approaches to overcome antifungal resistance is needed. However, the development of new antifungals is usually costly and time consuming; discovering the antifungal activity of non-antifungal agents is one way to address these problems. Interestingly, some researchers have demonstrated that several classes of immunosuppressants (calcineurin inhibitors, glucocorticoids, etc) also displayed potent antifungal activity when used alone or in combination with antifungals, especially with FLC. Some of them could increase FLC's susceptibility against resistant Candida albicans significantly reversing fungal resistance to FLC. This article reviews the antifungal activities of immunosuppressants used alone or in combination with antifungals and their potential antifungal mechanisms that have been discovered so far. Although immunosuppressive agents have been identified as risk factors for fungal infection, we believe these findings are very important for overcoming drug resistance and developing new antifungals.     

Echinocandins – structure,mechanism of action and use in antifungal therapy

With increasing number of immunocompromised patients as well as drug resistance in fungi, the risk of fatal fungal infections in humans increases as well. The action of echinocandins is based on the inhibition of β-(1,3)-d-glucan synthesis that builds the fungal cell wall. Caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin and rezafungin are semi-synthetic cyclic lipopeptides. Their specific chemical structure possess a potential to obtain novel derivatives with better pharmacological properties resulting in more effective treatment, especially in infections caused by Candida and Aspergillus species. In this review we summarise information about echinocandins with closer look on their chemical structure, mechanism of action, drug resistance and usage in clinical practice. We also introduce actual trends in modification of this antifungals as well as new methods of their administration, and additional use in viral and bacterial infections.     

Pharmacokinetics of Azole Antifungals in Cystic Fibrosis

Defects in mucociliary clearance predispose cystic fibrosis (CF) patients to airway colonization and infection by various fungi, especially Aspergillus fumigatus. Although the clinical significance of airway fungal colonization is not clear, several studies have suggested its association with worsening lung function and increased risk of CF exacerbations. Antifungal triazole agents have been used in CF patients with airway fungal colonization or infections with varying results. Limited pharmacokinetic studies to date have demonstrated high inter-subject variability of triazole levels among CF patients. This review discusses the basic principles of pharmacokinetics, the pharmacokinetic changes associated with CF and the effect of CF on the pharmacokinetic principles of azole antifungals. The inconsistent azole serum levels in CF patients may be associated with sub-therapeutic (thus risk of therapeutic failure and/or emergence of azole-resistant fungi) or supratherapeutic exposures (thus potential risk of azole toxicity), suggesting that therapeutic dose monitoring is necessary in CF patients.     

The role of second-generation triazole antifungal agents voriconazole and posaconazole in patients with hematologic malignancies

The second-generation triazoles, voriconazole and posaconazole, have found important roles in the management of invasive fungal infections in high-risk patients. Both agents are more active against Candida albicans and the non-albicans Candida species than the first-generation triazoles. They are active against Aspergillus species, including those species less susceptible to polyenes, and against a variety of non-Aspergillus molds. In contrast to posaconazole, voriconazole has no activity against the zygomycetes, and breakthrough infections have been observed. Both are well absorbed, but considerable intra- and interpatient pharmacokinetic variability has raised the question of therapeutic drug monitoring. Both inhibit hepatic cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, which are important in the metabolism of various drugs coadministered in the management of high-risk patients. Clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of both agents for antifungal prophylaxis and treatment in invasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, and in invasive fungal infections caused by a variety of non-Aspergillus molds. Posaconazole is the only triazole approved for use in the treatment of invasive zygomycosis. Voriconazole is the accepted standard first-line therapy for invasive aspergillosis.     

Biofilm Formation and its Impact on Antifungal Therapy

Fungi can protect themselves from host defences and antifungal drugs by the production of an extracellular hydrophobic matrix. Candida biofilms exhibit resistance to antifungal agents from all classes including the azoles, echinocandins, amphotericin B complex, and flucytosine. Although demonstrated on polystyrene and bronchial epithelia cells, until today, only indirect evidence for A. fumigatus biofilms in patients is available. The antifungals with the most activity against biofilms are the liposomal formulation of amphotericin B and agents in the echinocandin drug class. Importantly, echinocandins show excellent anti-biofilm activity against C. albicans at therapeutic concentrations. However, other biofilms formed by moulds, including A. fumigatus, are relatively resistant to echinocandins. Multiple mechanisms contribute to the intrinsic and acquired antifungal resistance during the different stages of fungal biofilm development. During the growth phase of the early biofilm various factors account for biofilm resistance. Combinational and sequential antifungal therapy as well as combination with enhancers can improve the effect of a single drug. Further studies are warranted to develop new therapeutic strategies targeting fungal biofilm-specific resistance mechanisms.     

Natural products targeting the synthesis of β(1,3)-D-glucan and chitin of the fungal cell wall. Existing drugs and recent findings

Background: During the last three decades systemic fungal infections associated to immunosuppressive therapies have become a serious healthcare problem. Clinical development of new antifungals is an urgent requirement. Since fungal but not mammalian cells are encased in a carbohydrate-containing cell wall, which is required for the growth and viability of fungi, the inhibition of cell wall synthesizing machinery, such as β(1,3)-D-glucan synthases (GS) and chitin synthases (CS) that catalyze the synthesis of β(1-3)-D-glucan and chitin, respectively, represent an ideal mode of action of antifungal agents. Although the echinocandins anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin are clinically well-established GS inhibitors for the treatment of invasive fungal infections, much effort must still be made to identify inhibitors of other enzymes and processes involved in the synthesis of the fungal cell wall.Purpose: Since natural products (NPs) have been the source of several antifungals in clinical use and also have provided important scaffolds for the development of semisynthetic analogues, this review was devoted to investigate the advances made to date in the discovery of NPs from plants that showed capacity of inhibiting cell wall synthesis targets. The chemical characterization, specific target, discovery process, along with the stage of development are provided here.Methods: An extensive systematic search for NPs against the cell wall was performed considering all the articles published until the end of 2020 through the following scientific databases: NCBI PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar and using the combination of the terms “natural antifungals” and “plant extracts” with “fungal cell wall”.Results: The first part of this review introduces the state of the art of the structure and biosynthesis of the fungal cell wall and considers exclusively those naturally produced GS antifungals that have given rise to both existing semisynthetic approved drugs and those derivatives currently in clinical trials. According to their chemical structure, natural GS inhibitors can be classified as 1) cyclic lipopeptides, 2) glycolipids and 3) acidic terpenoids. We also included nikkomycins and polyoxins, NPs that inhibit the CS, which have traditionally been considered good candidates for antifungal drug development but have finally been discarded after enduring unsuccessful clinical trials. Finally, the review focuses in the most recent findings about the growing field of plant-derived molecules and extracts that exhibit activity against the fungal cell wall. Thus, this search yielded sixteen articles, nine of which deal with pure compounds and seven with plant extracts or fractions with proven activity against the fungal cell wall. Regarding the mechanism of action, seven (44%) produced GS inhibition while five (31%) inhibited CS. Some of them (56%) interfered with other components of the cell wall. Most of the analyzed articles refer to tests carried out in vitro and therefore are in early stages of development.Conclusion: This report delivers an overview about both existing natural antifungals targeting GS and CS activities and their mechanisms of action. It also presents recent discoveries on natural products that may be used as starting points for the development of potential selective and non-toxic antifungal drugs.     

Influence of Serum and Albumin on Echinocandin In Vitro Potency and Pharmacodynamics

The echinocandins target fungi by inhibiting the production of (1,3)-β-d-glucan, an essential component of the fungal cell wall. These agents have less toxicity to mammalian cells, as compared to other antifungals; however, they maintain potent activity against many pathogenic fungi, including polyene- and azole-resistant isolates. Members of this class are highly protein-bound, and the addition of serum or albumin to the growth medium has profound effects on their in vitro potency and pharmacodynamics. In addition, studies have demonstrated an association between in vitro activity, in the presence of serum, and outcomes in animal models of invasive fungal infections. Serum and albumin may also be useful to help detect echinocandin-resistant Candida isolates with point mutations in the gene that encodes for glucan synthase. Thus, in vitro studies evaluating echinocandins in the presence of protein can provide valuable insight regarding their potency and pharmacodynamics.     

The role of echinocandins, extended-spectrum azoles, and polyenes to treat opportunistic moulds and Candida

Three classes of antifungals—polyenes, extended-spectrum azoles, and echinocandins—are now available for treating systemic fungal infections. Guidance for the appropriate use of this expanded variety of antifungals may come from recent clinical trials. Extended-spectrum azoles have excellent in vitro activity against Aspergillus and have been shown to improve clinical outcomes. For Zygomycetes, along with the lipid formulations of amphotericin, of the new agents, only posaconazole has activity. For Candida, the echinocandins offer a broad spectrum of activity. These new agents offer less toxicity and potentially improved efficacy in these difficult infections.