Thermostabilization of enzymes by the chaperonin GroEL

Summary The influence of GroEL on the heat-inactivation of nine enzymes was analyzed. Five dehydrogenases and four other unrelated enzymes were heat-inactivated in the absence and presence of GroEL, at three different temperatures. GroEL protected most enzymes against inactivation and prevented their aggregation. Further, the formation of a highly stable complex was observed when rhodanese was thermoinactivated in the presence of GroEL.     

Comparative Analysis of the Effects of α-Crystallin and GroEL on the Kinetics of Thermal Aggregation of Rabbit Muscle Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase

Effects of α-crystallin and GroEL on the kinetics of thermal aggregation of rabbit muscle glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) have been studied using dynamic light scattering and analytical ultracentrifugation. The analysis of the initial parts of the dependences of the hydrodynamic radius of protein aggregates on time shows that in the presence of α-crystallin or GroEL the kinetic regime of GAPDH aggregation is changed from the regime of diffusion-limited cluster–cluster aggregation to the regime of reaction-limited cluster–cluster aggregation, wherein the sticking probability for the colliding particles becomes lower the unity. In contrast to α-crystallin, GroEL does not interfere with formation of the start aggregates which include denatured GAPDH molecules. On the basis of the analytical ultracentrifugation data the conclusion has been made that the products of dissociation of GAPDH and α-crystallin or GroEL play an important role in the interactions of GAPDH and chaperones at elevated temperatures.     

Promotion of the in vitro renaturation of dodecameric glutamine synthetase from Escherichia coli in the presence of GroEL (chaperonin-60) and ATP.

The folding and assembly of dodecameric glutamine synthetase (GS) from Escherichia coli was examined in the absence and presence of the E. coli heat shock protein, GroEL (chaperonin-60). At nonphysiological temperatures (15-20 degrees C), unfolded GS spontaneously renatured to 80-90% of its original activity in the absence of GroEL. At near-physiological temperatures (37 degrees C), only 20-40% of the original activity returns. Under the latter solution conditions, GroEL and ATP enhance the extent of GS renaturation to 70-80% of the original activity at 37 degrees C. In the absence of ATP, GroEL arrests the renaturation of unfolded GS by forming a stable binary complex. The addition of ATP to this complex resulted in the release of GS subunits and formation of active dodecameric GS. The order of addition of ATP or unfolded GS to GroEL results in differences in the t1/2 values where half-maximal GS activity is attained. At a constant GS concentration, the formation of the GroEL.GS complex followed by ATP addition resulted in approximately a 2-fold increase in the observed t1/2 value compared to that observed when GroEL was preincubated with ATP before the GS renaturation reaction was initiated. These differences in renaturation rates may be related to binding affinity differences between the ATP-free and -bound GroEL conformer for unfolded or partially folded protein substrates [Badcoe, I. G., Smith, C. J., Wood, S., Halsall, D. J., Holbrook, J. J., Lund, P., & Clarke, A. R. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 9195-9200].(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The lower hydrolysis of ATP by the stress protein GroEL is a major factor responsible for the diminished chaperonin activity at low temperature

The chaperonins GroEL and GroES were shown to facilitate the refolding of urea-unfolded rhodanese in an ATP-dependent process at 25 or 37 degrees C. A diminished chaperonin activity was observed at 10 degrees C, however. At low temperature, GroEL retains its ability to form a complex with urea-unfolded rhodanese or with GroES. GroEL is also able to bind ATP at 10 degrees C. Interestingly, the ATPase activity of GroEL was highly decreased at low temperatures. Hydrolysis of ATP by GroEL was 60% less at 10 degrees C than at 25 degrees C. We conclude that the reduced hydrolysis of ATP by GroEL is a major but perhaps not the only factor responsible for the diminished chaperonin activity at 10 degrees C. GroEL may function primarily at higher temperatures in which the ability of GroEL to hydrolyze ATP is not compromised.     

Effect of ADP and GroES on interaction of molecular chaperonin GroEL with non-native lysozyme

The interaction of the molecular chaperonin GroEL with fluorescein-labeled lysozyme in the presence of high concentrations of thiol reagent--dithiothreitol (DTT) has been studied. In case of high concentrations of DTT lysozyme loses the native conformation due to the disruption of the intramolecular disulfide bonds stabilizing its structure and effectively aggregates. It has been shown that in the presence of high concentrations of DTT and two-fold molar excess of GroEL the lysozyme tightly interacts with GroEL that essentially decreases the efficiency of its aggregation. The addition of ADP to the complex of GroEL with nonnative lysozyme noticeably decreases the interaction of the chaperonin with nonnative protein target resulting in some increase of the efficiency of its aggregation. However, the addition of the co-chaperonin GroES together with ADP (i.e. the formation of the complex of GroEL with GroES) leads to drastic weakness of the interaction of GroEL with nonnative lysozyme and the efficiency of its aggregation becomes comparable with that in the absence of GroEL.     

GroEL interacts transiently with oxidatively inactivated rhodanese facilitating its reactivation

When the enzyme rhodanese was inactivated with hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), it underwent significant conformational changes, leading to an increased exposure of hydrophobic surfaces. Thus, this protein seemed to be an ideal substrate for GroEL, since GroEL uses hydrophobic interactions to bind to its substrate polypeptides. Here, we report on the facilitated reactivation (86%) of H(2)O(2)-inactivated rhodanese by GroEL alone. Reactivation by GroEL required a reductant and the enzyme substrate, but not GroES or ATP. Further, we found that GroEL interacted weakly and/or transiently with H(2)O(2)-inactivated rhodanese. A strong interaction with rhodanese was obtained when the enzyme was pre-incubated with urea, indicating that exposure of hydrophobic surfaces alone on oxidized rhodanese was not sufficient for the formation of a strong complex and that a more unfolded structure of rhodanese was required to interact strongly with GroEL. Unlike prior studies that involved denaturation of rhodanese through chemical or thermal means, we have clearly shown that GroEL can function as a molecular chaperone in the reactivation of an oxidatively inactivated protein. Additionally, the mechanism for the GroEL-facilitated reactivation of rhodanese shown here appears to be different than that for the chaperonin-assisted folding of chemically unfolded polypeptides in which a nucleotide and sometimes GroES is required.     

Reactivation of thermally inactivated enzymes by free and immobilized chaperonin GroEL/ES

Thermally inactivated bovine deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I) and yeast enolase were reactivated by GroEL/ES from Escherichia coli. In both cases, GroEL/ES was found to have the ability to reactivate inactivated enzymes in an ATP-dependent manner. GroEL/ES can interact with the enzymes that were denatured at high temperature and convert them to the active conformations. To test the applicability of GroEL/ES to the reactivation processes of thermally inactivated enzymes, GroEL/ES was immobilized using formyl-Cellulofine (GroEL/ES-Cellulofine) and its performance was studied. GroEL/ES-Cellulofine retained a sufficiently high ability to reactivate enzymes. Moreover, GroEL/ES-Cellulofine could be used repeatedly, indicating high durability. These results indicate that immobilized chaperonin is effective for reactivation of enzymes that are thermally inactivated in various bioprocesses. Received: 16 December 1996 / Received last revision: 21 February 1997 / Accepted: 28 February 1997     

Aggregation of creatine kinase during refolding and chaperonin-mediated folding of creatine kinase

The course of refolding and reactivation of urea-denatured creatine kinase (ATP; creatine N-phosphotransferase, EC 2.7.3.2) has been studied in the absence and presence of molecular chaperonin GroEL. The enzyme was denatured in Tris--HCl buffer containing 6 M urea for 1 h. In the refolding studies, the denatured enzyme was diluted 60-fold into the same buffer containing GroEL or not for activity, turbidity, fluorescence measurements and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The results show that the reactivation process is dependent of creatine kinase concentration in the concentration range 2.5--4 microM. The levels of activity recovery decrease with increasing enzyme concentration because of the formation of wrong aggregates. The molecular chaperonin GroEL can bind the refolding intermediate of creatine kinase and thus prevent the formation of wrong aggregates. This intermediate is an inactive dimeric form that is in a conformation resembling the 'molten globule' state.     

Hsp70 chaperone machine remodels protein aggregates at the initial step of Hsp70-Hsp100-dependent disaggregation

Exposure to temperatures over a certain limit leads to massive protein aggregation in the cell. Disaggregation of such aggregates is largely dependent on the Hsp100 and Hsp70 chaperones. The exact role of the Hsp70 chaperone machine (composed of DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE) in the Hsp100-dependent process remains unknown. In this study we focused on the Hsp70 role at the initial step of the disaggregation process. Two different aggregated model substrates, green fluorescent protein (GFP) and firefly luciferase, were incubated with the Hsp70 machine resulting in efficient fragmentation of large aggregates into smaller ones. Our data suggest that the observed fragmentation is achieved first by extraction of polypeptides from aggregates in Hsp70 chaperone machine-dependent manner and not by direct fragmentation of large aggregates. In the absence of Hsp100 (ClpB) these "extracted" polypeptides were not able to fold properly and promptly reassociated into new aggregates. The extracted GFP molecules were efficiently recognized and sequestered by a molecular trap, the mutant GroEL D87K, which binds stably to unfolded but not to native polypeptides. The binding of extracted GFP molecules to the GroEL trap prevented their reaggregation. We propose that the Hsp70 machine disentangles polypeptides from protein aggregates prior to Hsp100 action.     

Denaturation and reassembly of chaperonin GroEL studied by solution X-ray scattering

We measured the denaturation and reassembly of Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL using small-angle solution X-ray scattering, which is a powerful technique for studying the overall structure and assembly of a protein in solution. The results of the urea-induced unfolding transition show that GroEL partially dissociates in the presence of more than 2 M urea, cooperatively unfolds at around 3 M urea, and is in a monomeric random coil-like unfolded structure at more than 3.2 M urea. Attempted refolding of the unfolded GroEL monomer by a simple dilution procedure is not successful, leading to formation of aggregates. However, the presence of ammonium sulfate and MgADP allows the fully unfolded GroEL to refold into a structure with the same hydrodynamic dimension, within experimental error, as that of the native GroEL. Moreover, the X-ray scattering profiles of the GroEL thus refolded and the native GroEL are coincident with each other, showing that the refolded GroEL has the same structure and the molecular mass as the native GroEL. These results demonstrate that the fully unfolded GroEL monomer can refold and reassemble into the native tetradecameric structure in the presence of ammonium sulfate and MgADP without ATP hydrolysis and preexisting chaperones. Therefore, GroEL can, in principle, fold and assemble into the native structure according to the intrinsic characteristic of its polypeptide chain, although preexisting GroEL would be important when the GroEL folding takes place under in vivo conditions, in order to avoid misfolding and aggregation.     

Chaperonin-affected refolding of alpha-lactalbumin: effects of nucleotides and the co-chaperonin GroES.

We have studied how nucleotides (ADP, AMP-PNP, and ATP) and the co-chaperonin GroES influence the GroEL-affected refolding of apo-alpha-lactalbumin. The refolding reactions induced by stopped-flow pH jumps were monitored by alpha-lactalbumin tryptophan fluorescence. The simple single-exponential character of the free-refolding kinetics of the protein allowed us to quantitatively analyze the kinetic traces of the GroEL-affected refolding with the aid of computer simulations, and to obtain the best-fit parameters for binding between GroEL and the refolding intermediate of alpha-lactalbumin by the non-linear least-squares method. When GroES was absent, the interaction between GroEL and alpha-lactalbumin could be well represented by a "cooperative-binding" model in which GroEL has two binding sites for alpha-lactalbumin with the affinity of the second site being tenfold weaker than that of the first, so that there is negative cooperativity between the two sites. The affinity between GroEL and alpha-lactalbumin was significantly reduced when ATP was present, while ADP and AMP-PNP did not alter the affinity. A comparison of this result with those reported previously for other target proteins suggests a remarkable adjustability of the GroEL 14-mer with respect to the nucleotide-induced reduction of affinity. When GroES was present, ATP as well as ADP and AMP-PNP were effective in reducing the affinity between GroEL and the refolding intermediate of alpha-lactalbumin. The affinity at a saturating concentration of ADP or AMP-PNP was about ten times lower than with GroEL alone. The ADP concentration at which the acceleration of the GroEL/ES-affected refolding of alphaLA was observed, was higher than the concentration at which the nucleotide-induced formation of the GroEL/ES complex took place. These results indicate that GroEL/ES complex formation itself is not enough to reduce the affinity for alpha-lactalbumin, and that further binding of the nucleotide to the GroEL/ES complex is required to reduce the affinity.     

Interaction of oxidized chaperonin GroEL with an unfolded protein at low temperatures

The chaperonin GroEL binds to non-native substrate proteins via hydrophobic interactions, preventing their aggregation, which is minimized at low temperatures. In the present study, we investigated the refolding of urea-denatured rhodanese at low temperatures, in the presence of ox-GroEL (oxidized GroEL), which contains increased exposed hydrophobic surfaces and retains its ability to hydrolyse ATP. We found that ox-GroEL could efficiently bind the urea-unfolded rhodanese at 4°C, without requiring excess amount of chaperonin relative to normal GroEL (i.e. non-oxidized). The release/reactivation of rhodanese from GroEL was minimal at 4°C, but was found to be optimal between 22 and 37°C. It was found that the loss of the ATPase activity of ox-GroEL at 4°C prevented the release of rhodanese from the GroEL-rhodanese complex. Thus ox-GroEL has the potential to efficiently trap recombinant or non-native proteins at 4°C and release them at higher temperatures under appropriate conditions.     

Non-functioning chaperonin GroEL stimulates protein aggregation

To clarify the role of chaperones in the development of amyloid diseases, the interaction of the chaperonin GroEL with misfolded proteins and recombinant prions has been studied. The efficiency of the chaperonin-assisted folding of denatured glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was shown to be decreased in the presence of prions. Prions are capable of binding to GroEL immobilized on Sepharose, but this does not prevent the interaction between GroEL and other denatured proteins. The size of individual proteins (GroEL, GAPDH, and the recombinant prion) and aggregates formed after their mixing have been determined by the dynamic light scattering analysis. It was shown that at 25°C, the non-functioning chaperonin (equimolar mixture of GroEL and GroES in the absence of Mg-ATP) bound prion yielding large aggregates (greater than 400 nm). The addition of Mg-ATP decreased significantly the size of the aggregates to 70–80 nm. After blocking of one of the chaperonin active sites by oxidized denatured GAPDH, the aggregate size increased to 1200 nm, and the addition of Mg-ATP did not prevent the aggregation. These data indicate the significant role of chaperonins in the formation of amyloid structures and demonstrate the acceleration of aggregation in the presence of functionally inactive chaperonins. The suggested model can be used for the analysis of the efficiency of antiaggregants in the system containing chaperonins.     

"Half of the sites" binding of D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase folding intermediate with GroEL

Two D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) folding intermediate subunits bind with chaperonin 60 (GroEL) to form a stable complex, which can no longer bind with additional GAPDH intermediate subunits, but does bind with one more lysozyme folding intermediate or one chaperonin 10 (GroES) molecule, suggesting that the two GAPDH subunits bind at one end of the GroEL molecule displaying a "half of the sites" binding profile. For lysozyme, GroEL binds with either one or two folding intermediates to form a stable 1:1 or 1:2 complex with one substrate on each end of the GroEL double ring for the latter. The 1:1 complex of GroEL.GroES binds with one lysozyme or one dimeric GAPDH folding intermediate to form a stable ternary complex. Both complexes of GroEL.lysozyme1 and GroEL.GAPDH2 bind with one GroES molecule only at the other end of the GroEL molecule forming a trans ternary complex. According to the stoichiometry of GroEL binding with the GAPDH folding intermediate and the formation of ternary complexes containing GroEL.GAPDH2, it is suggested that the folding intermediate of GAPDH binds, very likely in the dimeric form, with GroEL at one end only.     

The aggregation state of rhodanese during folding influences the ability of GroEL to assist reactivation

The in vitro folding of rhodanese involves a competition between formation of properly folded enzyme and off-pathway inactive species. Co-solvents like glycerol or low temperature, e.g. refolding at 10 degrees C, successfully retard the off-pathway formation of large inactive aggregates, but the process does not yield 100% active enzyme. These data suggest that mis-folded species are formed from early folding intermediates. GroEL can capture early folding intermediates, and it loses the ability to capture and reactivate rhodanese if the enzyme is allowed first to spontaneously fold for longer times before it is presented to GroEL, a process that leads to the formation of unproductive intermediates. In addition, GroEL cannot reverse large aggregates once they are formed, but it could capture some folding intermediates and activate them, even though they are not capable of forming active enzyme if left to spontaneous refolding. The interaction between GroEL and rhodanese substantially but not completely inhibits intra-protein inactivation, which is responsible for incomplete activation during unassisted refolding. Thus, GroEL not only decreases aggregation, but it gives the highest reactivation of any method of assistance. The results are interpreted using a previously suggested model based on studies of the spontaneous folding of rhodanese (Gorovits, B. M., McGee, W. A., and Horowitz, P. M. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1382, 120--128 and Panda, M., Gorovits, B. M., and Horowitz, P. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 63--70).     

On the role of symmetrical and asymmetrical chaperonin complexes in assisted protein folding.

The cylindrical chaperonin GroEL of E. coli and its ring-shaped cofactor GroES cooperate in mediating the ATP-dependent folding of a wide range of polypeptides in vivo and in vitro. By binding to the ends of the GroEL cylinder, GroES displaces GroEL-bound polypeptide into an enclosed folding cage, thereby preventing protein aggregation during folding. The dynamic interaction of GroEL and GroES is regulated by the GroEL ATPase and involves the formation of asymmetrical GroEL:GroES1 and symmetrical GroEL: GroES2 complexes. The proposed role of the symmetrical complex as a catalytic intermediate of the chaperonin mechanism has been controversial. It has also been suggested that the formation of GroEL:GroES2 complexes allows the folding of two polypeptide molecules per GroEL reaction cycle, one in each ring of GroEL. By making use of a procedure to stabilize chaperonin complexes by rapid crosslinking for subsequent analysis by native PAGE, we have quantified the occurrence of GroEL:GroES1 and GroEL:GroES2 complexes in active refolding reactions under a variety of conditions using mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (mMDH) as a substrate. Our results show that the symmetrical complexes are neither required for chaperonin function nor does their presence significantly increase the rate of mMDH refolding. In contrast, chaperonin-assisted folding is strictly dependent on the formation of asymmetrical GroEL:GroES1 complexes. These findings support the view that GroEL:GroES2 complexes have no essential role in the chaperonin mechanism.     

Unfolded, oxidized, and thermoinactivated forms of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase interact with the chaperonin GroEL in different ways

The interaction of GroEL with different denatured forms of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase* (GAPDH) has been investigated. GroEL does not prevent thermal denaturation of GAPDH, but effectively interacts with the thermodenatured enzyme, thus preventing the aggregation of denatured molecules. Binding of the thermodenatured GAPDH shifts the Tm value of the GroEL thermodenaturation curve by 3 degrees towards higher temperatures and increases the DeltaHcal value 1.44-fold, indicating a significant increase in the thermal stability of the resulting complex. GAPDH thermodenatured in the presence of GroEL cannot be reactivated by the addition of GroES, Mg2+, and ATP. In contrast, GAPDH denatured in guanidine hydrochloride (GAPDHden) is reactivated in the presence of GroEL, GroES, Mg2+, and ATP, yielding 11-15% of its original activity, while the spontaneous reactivation yields only 2-3%. The oxidation of GAPDH with hydrogen peroxide in the presence of 4 M guanidine hydrochloride results in the formation of the enzyme (GAPDHox) that cannot acquire its native conformation and binds to GroEL irreversibly. Binding of GAPDHox to one of the GroEL rings completely inhibits the GroEL-assisted reactivation of GAPDHden, but does not affect the GroEL-assisted reactivation of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). The data suggest that LDH can be successfully reactivated due to the binding of the denatured molecules to the apical domain of the opposite GroEL ring with their subsequent release into the solution without encapsulation (trans-mechanism). In contrast, GAPDH requires the hydrophilic cavity for the reactivation (cis-mechanism).     

Potential role of methionine sulfoxide in the inactivation of the chaperone GroEL by hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and peroxynitrite (ONOO-)

GroEL is an Escherichia coli molecular chaperone that functions in vivo to fold newly synthesized polypeptides as well as to bind and refold denatured proteins during stress. This protein is a suitable model for its eukaryotic homolog, heat shock protein 60 (Hsp60), due to the high number of conserved amino acid sequences and similar function. Here, we will provide evidence that GroEL is rather insensitive to oxidants produced endogenously during metabolism, such as nitric oxide (.NO) or hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), but is modified and inactivated by efficiently reactive species generated by phagocytes, such as peroxynitrite (ONOO(-)) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl). For the exposure of 17.5 microm GroEL to 100-250 microm HOCl, the major pathway of inactivation was through the oxidation of methionine to methionine sulfoxide, established through mass spectrometric detection of methionine sulfoxide and the reactivation of a significant fraction of inactivated GroEL by the enzyme methionine sulfoxide reductase B/A (MsrB/A). In addition to the oxidation of methionine, HOCl caused the conversion of cysteine to cysteic acid and this product may account for the remainder of inactivated GroEL not recoverable through MsrB/A. In contrast, HOCl produced only negligible yields of 3-chlorotyrosine. A remarkable finding was the conversion of Met(111) and Met(114) to Met sulfone, which suggests a rather low reduction potential of these 2 residues in GroEL. The high sensitivity of GroEL toward HOCl and ONOO(-) suggests that this protein may be a target for bacterial killing by phagocytes.     

Determination of the number of active GroES subunits in the fused heptamer GroES required for interactions with GroEL

A double-heptamer ring chaperonin GroEL binds denatured substrate protein, ATP, and GroES to the same heptamer ring and encapsulates substrate into the central cavity underneath GroES where productive folding occurs. GroES is a disk-shaped heptamer, and each subunit has a GroEL-binding loop. The residues of the GroEL subunit responsible for GroES binding largely overlap those involved in substrate binding, and the mechanism by which GroES can replace the substrate when GroES binds to GroEL/substrate complex remains to be clarified. To address this question, we generated single polypeptide GroES by fusing seven subunits with various combinations of active and GroEL binding-defective subunits. Functional tests of the fused GroES variants indicated that four active GroES subunits were required for efficient formation of the stable GroEL/GroES complex and five subunits were required for the productive GroEL/substrate/GroES complex. An increase in the number of defective GroES subunits resulted in a slowing of encapsulation and folding. These results indicate the presence of an intermediate GroEL/substrate/GroES complex in which the substrate and GroES bind to GroEL by sharing seven common binding sites.