A strategy for the rapid multiple alignment of protein sequences. Confidence levels from tertiary structure comparisons

An algorithm is presented for the multiple alignment of protein sequences that is both accurate and rapid computationally. The approach is based on the conventional dynamic-programming method of pairwise alignment. Initially, two sequences are aligned, then the third sequence is aligned against the alignment of both sequences one and two. Similarly, the fourth sequence is aligned against one, two and three. This is repeated until all sequences have been aligned. Iteration is then performed to yield a final alignment. The accuracy of sequence alignment is evaluated from alignment of the secondary structures in a family of proteins. For the globins, the multiple alignment was on average 99% accurate compared to 90% for pairwise comparison of sequences. For the alignment of immunoglobulin constant and variable domains, the use of many sequences yielded an alignment of 63% average accuracy compared to 41% average for individual variable/constant alignments. The multiple alignment algorithm yields an assignment of disulphide connectivity in mammalian serotransferrin that is consistent with crystallographic data, whereas pairwise alignments give an alternative assignment.     

MELDB: a database for microbial esterases and lipases

MELDB is a comprehensive protein database of microbial esterases and lipases which are hydrolytic enzymes important in the modern industry. Proteins in MELDB are clustered into groups according to their sequence similarities based on a local pairwise alignment algorithm and a graph clustering algorithm (TribeMCL). This differs from traditional approaches that use global pairwise alignment and joining methods. Our procedure was able to reduce the noise caused by dubious alignment in the distantly related or unrelated regions in the sequences. In the database, 883 esterase and lipase sequences derived from microbial sources are deposited and conserved parts of each protein are identified. HMM profiles of each cluster were generated to classify unknown sequences. Contents of the database can be keyword-searched and query sequences can be aligned to sequence profiles and sequences themselves.     

An Eulerian path approach to global multiple alignment for DNA sequences.

With the rapid increase in the dataset of genome sequences, the multiple sequence alignment problem is increasingly important and frequently involves the alignment of a large number of sequences. Many heuristic algorithms have been proposed to improve the speed of computation and the quality of alignment. We introduce a novel approach that is fundamentally different from all currently available methods. Our motivation comes from the Eulerian method for fragment assembly in DNA sequencing that transforms all DNA fragments into a de Bruijn graph and then reduces sequence assembly to a Eulerian path problem. The paper focuses on global multiple alignment of DNA sequences, where entire sequences are aligned into one configuration. Our main result is an algorithm with almost linear computational speed with respect to the total size (number of letters) of sequences to be aligned. Five hundred simulated sequences (averaging 500 bases per sequence and as low as 70% pairwise identity) have been aligned within three minutes on a personal computer, and the quality of alignment is satisfactory. As a result, accurate and simultaneous alignment of thousands of long sequences within a reasonable amount of time becomes possible. Data from an Arabidopsis sequencing project is used to demonstrate the performance.     

Alignment of protein sequences by their profiles

The accuracy of an alignment between two protein sequences can be improved by including other detectably related sequences in the comparison. We optimize and benchmark such an approach that relies on aligning two multiple sequence alignments, each one including one of the two protein sequences. Thirteen different protocols for creating and comparing profiles corresponding to the multiple sequence alignments are implemented in the SALIGN command of MODELLER. A test set of 200 pairwise, structure-based alignments with sequence identities below 40% is used to benchmark the 13 protocols as well as a number of previously described sequence alignment methods, including heuristic pairwise sequence alignment by BLAST, pairwise sequence alignment by global dynamic programming with an affine gap penalty function by the ALIGN command of MODELLER, sequence-profile alignment by PSI-BLAST, Hidden Markov Model methods implemented in SAM and LOBSTER, pairwise sequence alignment relying on predicted local structure by SEA, and multiple sequence alignment by CLUSTALW and COMPASS. The alignment accuracies of the best new protocols were significantly better than those of the other tested methods. For example, the fraction of the correctly aligned residues relative to the structure-based alignment by the best protocol is 56%, which can be compared with the accuracies of 26%, 42%, 43%, 48%, 50%, 49%, 43%, and 43% for the other methods, respectively. The new method is currently applied to large-scale comparative protein structure modeling of all known sequences.     

Grammar-based distance in progressive multiple sequence alignment

Background  

We propose a multiple sequence alignment (MSA) algorithm and compare the alignment-quality and execution-time of the proposed algorithm with that of existing algorithms. The proposed progressive alignment algorithm uses a grammar-based distance metric to determine the order in which biological sequences are to be pairwise aligned. The progressive alignment occurs via pairwise aligning new sequences with an ensemble of the sequences previously aligned.     

CLAGen: a tool for clustering and annotating gene sequences using a suffix tree algorithm

Most multiple gene sequence alignment methods rely on conventions regarding the score of a multiple alignment in pairwise fashion. Therefore, as the number of sequences increases, the runtime of sequencing expands exponentially. In order to solve the problem, this paper presents a multiple sequence alignment method using a linear-time suffix tree algorithm to cluster similar sequences at one time without pairwise alignment. After searching for common subsequences, cross-matching common subsequences were generated, and sometimes inexact matching was found. So, a procedure aimed at masking the inexact cross-matching pairs was suggested here. In addition, BLAST was combined with a clustering tool in order to annotate the clusters generated by suffix tree clustering. The proposed method for clustering and annotating genes consists of the following steps: (1) construction of a suffix tree; (2) searching and overlapping common subsequences; (3) grouping subsequence pairs; (4) masking cross-matching pairs; (5) clustering gene sequences; (6) annotating gene clusters by the BLAST search. The performance of the proposed system, CLAGen, was successfully evaluated with 42 gene sequences in a TCA cycle (a citrate cycle) of bacteria. The system generated 11 clusters and found the longest subsequences of each cluster, which are biologically significant.     

CLUSTAL: a package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer

An approach for performing multiple alignments of large numbers of amino acid or nucleotide sequences is described. The method is based on first deriving a phylogenetic tree from a matrix of all pairwise sequence similarity scores, obtained using a fast pairwise alignment algorithm. Then the multiple alignment is achieved from a series of pairwise alignments of clusters of sequences, following the order of branching in the tree. The method is sufficiently fast and economical with memory to be easily implemented on a microcomputer, and yet the results obtained are comparable to those from packages requiring mainframe computer facilities.     

Integrating ambiguously aligned regions of DNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses without violating positional homology

Phylogenetic analyses of non-protein-coding nucleotide sequences such as ribosomal RNA genes, internal transcribed spacers, and introns are often impeded by regions of the alignments that are ambiguously aligned. These regions are characterized by the presence of gaps and their uncertain positions, no matter which optimization criteria are used. This problem is particularly acute in large-scale phylogenetic studies and when aligning highly diverged sequences. Accommodating these regions, where positional homology is likely to be violated, in phylogenetic analyses has been dealt with very differently by molecular systematists and evolutionists, ranging from the total exclusion of these regions to the inclusion of every position regardless of ambiguity in the alignment. We present a new method that allows the inclusion of ambiguously aligned regions without violating homology. In this three-step procedure, first homologous regions of the alignment containing ambiguously aligned sequences are delimited. Second, each ambiguously aligned region is unequivocally coded as a new character, replacing its respective ambiguous region. Third, each of the coded characters is subjected to a specific step matrix to account for the differential number of changes (summing substitutions and indels) needed to transform one sequence to another. The optimal number of steps included in the step matrix is the one derived from the pairwise alignment with the greatest similarity and the least number of steps. In addition to potentially enhancing phylogenetic resolution and support, by integrating previously nonaccessible characters without violating positional homology, this new approach can improve branch length estimations when using parsimony.     

Grouping of amino acids and recognition of protein structurally conserved regions by reduced alphabets of amino acids

Sequence alignment is a common method for finding protein structurally conserved/similar regions. However, sequence alignment is often not accurate if sequence identities between to-be-aligned sequences are less than 30%. This is because that for these sequences, different residues may play similar structural roles and they are incorrectly aligned during the sequence alignment using substitution matrix consisting of 20 types of residues. Based on the similarity of physicochemical features, residues can be clustered into a few groups. Using such simplified alphabets, the complexity of protein sequences is reduced and at the same time the key information encoded in the sequences remains. As a result, the accuracy of sequence alignment might be improved if the residues are properly clustered. Here, by using a database of aligned protein structures (DAPS), a new clustering method based on the substitution scores is proposed for the grouping of residues, and substitution matrices of residues at different levels of simplification are constructed. The validity of the reduced alphabets is confirmed by relative entropy analysis. The reduced alphabets are applied to recognition of protein structurally conserved/similar regions by sequence alignment. The results indicate that the accuracy or efficiency of sequence alignment can be improved with the optimal reduced alphabet with N around 9.     

A hidden Markov model for progressive multiple alignment

MOTIVATION: Progressive algorithms are widely used heuristics for the production of alignments among multiple nucleic-acid or protein sequences. Probabilistic approaches providing measures of global and/or local reliability of individual solutions would constitute valuable developments. RESULTS: We present here a new method for multiple sequence alignment that combines an HMM approach, a progressive alignment algorithm, and a probabilistic evolution model describing the character substitution process. Our method works by iterating pairwise alignments according to a guide tree and defining each ancestral sequence from the pairwise alignment of its child nodes, thus, progressively constructing a multiple alignment. Our method allows for the computation of each column minimum posterior probability and we show that this value correlates with the correctness of the result, hence, providing an efficient mean by which unreliably aligned columns can be filtered out from a multiple alignment.     

A novel approach to remote homology detection: jumping alignments.

We describe a new algorithm for protein classification and the detection of remote homologs. The rationale is to exploit both vertical and horizontal information of a multiple alignment in a well-balanced manner. This is in contrast to established methods such as profiles and profile hidden Markov models which focus on vertical information as they model the columns of the alignment independently and to family pairwise search which focuses on horizontal information as it treats given sequences separately. In our setting, we want to select from a given database of "candidate sequences" those proteins that belong to a given superfamily. In order to do so, each candidate sequence is separately tested against a multiple alignment of the known members of the superfamily by means of a new jumping alignment algorithm. This algorithm is an extension of the Smith-Waterman algorithm and computes a local alignment of a single sequence and a multiple alignment. In contrast to traditional methods, however, this alignment is not based on a summary of the individual columns of the multiple alignment. Rather, the candidate sequence is at each position aligned to one sequence of the multiple alignment, called the "reference sequence." In addition, the reference sequence may change within the alignment, while each such jump is penalized. To evaluate the discriminative quality of the jumping alignment algorithm, we compare it to profiles, profile hidden Markov models, and family pairwise search on a subset of the SCOP database of protein domains. The discriminative quality is assessed by median false positive counts (med-FP-counts). For moderate med-FP-counts, the number of successful searches with our method is considerably higher than with the competing methods.     

Rate matrices for analyzing large families of protein sequences.

We propose and study a new approach for the analysis of families of protein sequences. This method is related to the LogDet distances used in phylogenetic reconstructions; it can be viewed as an attempt to embed these distances into a multidimensional framework. The proposed method starts by associating a Markov matrix to each pairwise alignment deduced from a given multiple alignment. The central objects under consideration here are matrix-valued logarithms L of these Markov matrices, which exist under conditions that are compatible with fairly large divergence between the sequences. These logarithms allow us to compare data from a family of aligned proteins with simple models (in particular, continuous reversible Markov models) and to test the adequacy of such models. If one neglects fluctuations arising from the finite length of sequences, any continuous reversible Markov model with a single rate matrix Q over an arbitrary tree predicts that all the observed matrices L are multiples of Q. Our method exploits this fact, without relying on any tree estimation. We test this prediction on a family of proteins encoded by the mitochondrial genome of 26 multicellular animals, which include vertebrates, arthropods, echinoderms, molluscs, and nematodes. A principal component analysis of the observed matrices L shows that a single rate model can be used as a rough approximation to the data, but that systematic deviations from any such model are unmistakable and related to the evolutionary history of the species under consideration.     

生物序列的聚类分析

通过不同的聚类方式,对公共数据库中生物序列数据进行生物信息的挖掘,以达到在更广泛和更深入的框架中了解它们之间的相互关系的目的。以帕金森病相关基因所对应的mRNA序列为例,使用双序列比对的得分值作为序列之间的距离定义。同时为解决不同聚类分析之间的差异,分别采用模糊聚类和层次聚类两种不同的方法进行聚类分析。并由不同聚类方法得到的一致分类聚类的结果为基因功能分类提供支持,为进一步揭示生物序列所蕴涵的生物学知识和生物学规律提供可参考的依据。     

Grouping of amino acids and recognition of protein structurally conserved regions by reduced alphabets of amino acids

Sequence alignment is a common method for finding protein structurally conserved/similar regions. However, sequence alignment is often not accurate if sequence identities between to-be-aligned sequences are less than 30%. This is because that for these sequences, different residues may play similar structural roles and they are incorrectly aligned during the sequence alignment using substitution matrix consisting of 20 types of residues. Based on the similarity of physicochemical features, residues can be clustered into a few groups. Using such simplified alphabets, the complexity of protein sequences is reduced and at the same time the key information encoded in the sequences remains. As a result, the accuracy of sequence alignment might be improved if the residues are properly clustered. Here, by using a database of aligned protein structures (DAPS), a new clustering method based on the substitution scores is proposed for the grouping of residues, and substitution matrices of residues at different levels of simplification are constructed. The validity of the reduced alphabets is confirmed by relative entropy analysis. The reduced alphabets are applied to recognition of protein structurally conserved/similar regions by sequence alignment. The results indicate that the accuracy or efficiency of sequence alignment can be improved with the optimal reduced alphabet with N around 9. Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 90403120, 10474041 and 10021001) and the Nonlinear Project (973) of the NSM     

A method for multiple sequence alignment with gaps

A method that performs multiple sequence alignment by cyclical use of the standard pairwise Needleman-Wunsch algorithm is presented. The required central processor unit time is of the same order of magnitude as the standard Needleman-Wunsch pairwise implementation. Comparison with the one known case where the optimal multiple sequence alignment has been rigorously determined shows that in practice the proposed method finds the mathematically optimal solution. The more interesting question of the biological usefulness of such multiple sequence alignment over pairwise approaches is assessed using protein families whose X-ray structures are known. The two such cases studied, the subdomains of the ricin B-chain and the S-domains of virus coat proteins, have low pairwise similarity and thus fail to align correctly under standard pairwise sequence comparison. In both cases the multiple sequence alignment produced by the proposed technique, apart from minor deviations at loop regions, correctly predicts the true structural alignment. Thus, given many sequences of low pairwise similarity, the proposed multiple sequence method, can extract any familial similarity and so produce a sequence alignment consistent with the underlying structural homology.     

Building multiple alignments from pairwise alignments

Given a family of related sequences, one can first determinealignments between various pairs of those sequences, then constructa simultaneous alignment of all the sequences that is determinedin a natural manner by the set of pairwise alignments. Thisapproach is sometimes effective for exposing the existence andlocations of conserved regions, which can then be aligned bymore sensitive multiple-alignment methods. This paper presentsan efficient algorithm for constructing a multiple alignmentfrom a set of pairwise alignments.     

The deterministic effects of alignment bias in phylogenetic inference

Alignment of nucleotide and/or amino acid sequences is a fundamental component of sequence‐based molecular phylogenetic studies. Here we examined how different alignment methods affect the phylogenetic trees that are inferred from the alignments. We used simulations to determine how alignment errors can lead to systematic biases that affect phylogenetic inference from those sequences. We compared four approaches to sequence alignment: progressive pairwise alignment, simultaneous multiple alignment of sequence fragments, local pairwise alignment and direct optimization. When taking into account branch support, implied alignments produced by direct optimization were found to show the most extreme behaviour (based on the alignment programs for which nearly equivalent alignment parameters could be set) in that they provided the strongest support for the correct tree in the simulations in which it was easy to resolve the correct tree and the strongest support for the incorrect tree in our long‐branch‐attraction simulations. When applied to alignment‐sensitive process partitions with different histories, direct optimization showed the strongest mutual influence between the process partitions when they were aligned and phylogenetically analysed together, which makes detecting recombination more difficult. Simultaneous alignment performed well relative to direct optimization and progressive pairwise alignment across all simulations. Rather than relying upon methods that integrate alignment and tree search into a single step without accounting for alignment uncertainty, as with implied alignments, we suggest that simultaneous alignment using the similarity criterion, within the context of information available on biological processes and function, be applied whenever possible for sequence‐based phylogenetic analyses.     

A fast and sensitive multiple sequence alignment algorithm

A two-step multiple alignment strategy is presented that allowsrapid alignment of a set of homologous sequences and comparisonof pre-aligned groups of sequences. Examples are given demonstratingthe improvement in the quality of alignments when comparingentire groups instead of single sequences. The modular designof computer programs based on this algorithm allows for storageof aligned sequences and successive alignment of any numberof sequences. Received on August 23, 1988; accepted on December 6, 1988     

PCMA: fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment based on profile consistency

PCMA (profile consistency multiple sequence alignment) is a progressive multiple sequence alignment program that combines two different alignment strategies. Highly similar sequences are aligned in a fast way as in ClustalW, forming pre-aligned groups. The T-Coffee strategy is applied to align the relatively divergent groups based on profile-profile comparison and consistency. The scoring function for local alignments of pre-aligned groups is based on a novel profile-profile comparison method that is a generalization of the PSI-BLAST approach to profile-sequence comparison. PCMA balances speed and accuracy in a flexible way and is suitable for aligning large numbers of sequences. AVAILABILITY: PCMA is freely available for non-commercial use. Pre-compiled versions for several platforms can be downloaded from ftp://iole.swmed.edu/pub/PCMA/.     

Biclustering as a method for RNA local multiple sequence alignment

Motivations: Biclustering is a clustering method that simultaneously clusters both the domain and range of a relation. A challenge in multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is that the alignment of sequences is often intended to reveal groups of conserved functional subsequences. Simultaneously, the grouping of the sequences can impact the alignment; precisely the kind of dual situation biclustering is intended to address. RESULTS: We define a representation of the MSA problem enabling the application of biclustering algorithms. We develop a computer program for local MSA, BlockMSA, that combines biclustering with divide-and-conquer. BlockMSA simultaneously finds groups of similar sequences and locally aligns subsequences within them. Further alignment is accomplished by dividing both the set of sequences and their contents. The net result is both a multiple sequence alignment and a hierarchical clustering of the sequences. BlockMSA was tested on the subsets of the BRAliBase 2.1 benchmark suite that display high variability and on an extension to that suite to larger problem sizes. Also, alignments were evaluated of two large datasets of current biological interest, T box sequences and Group IC1 Introns. The results were compared with alignments computed by ClustalW, MAFFT, MUCLE and PROBCONS alignment programs using Sum of Pairs (SPS) and Consensus Count. Results for the benchmark suite are sensitive to problem size. On problems of 15 or greater sequences, BlockMSA is consistently the best. On none of the problems in the test suite are there appreciable differences in scores among BlockMSA, MAFFT and PROBCONS. On the T box sequences, BlockMSA does the most faithful job of reproducing known annotations. MAFFT and PROBCONS do not. On the Intron sequences, BlockMSA, MAFFT and MUSCLE are comparable at identifying conserved regions. AVAILABILITY: BlockMSA is implemented in Java. Source code and supplementary datasets are available at http://aug.csres.utexas.edu/msa/