The 3C Protein of Enterovirus 71 Inhibits Retinoid Acid-Inducible Gene I-Mediated Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 Activation and Type I Interferon Responses

Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is a human pathogen that induces hand, foot, and mouth disease and fatal neurological diseases. Immature or impaired immunity is thought to associate with increased morbidity and mortality. In a murine model, EV71 does not facilitate the production of type I interferon (IFN) that plays a critical role in the first-line defense against viral infection. Administration of a neutralizing antibody to IFN-α/β exacerbates the virus-induced disease. However, the molecular events governing this process remain elusive. Here, we report that EV71 suppresses the induction of antiviral immunity by targeting the cytosolic receptor retinoid acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I). In infected cells, EV71 inhibits the expression of IFN-β, IFN-stimulated gene 54 (ISG54), ISG56, and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Among structural and nonstructural proteins encoded by EV71, the 3C protein is capable of inhibiting IFN-β activation by virus and RIG-I. Nevertheless, EV71 3C exhibits no inhibitory activity on MDA5. Remarkably, when expressed in mammalian cells, EV71 3C associates with RIG-I via the caspase recruitment domain. This precludes the recruitment of an adaptor IPS-1 by RIG-I and subsequent nuclear translocation of interferon regulatory factor 3. An R84Q or V154S substitution in the RNA binding motifs has no effect. An H40D substitution is detrimental, but the protease activity associated with 3C is dispensable. Together, these results suggest that inhibition of RIG-I-mediated type I IFN responses by the 3C protein may contribute to the pathogenesis of EV71 infection.Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus belonging to the Picornaviridae family. The viral genome is approximately 7,500 nucleotides in length, with a single open reading frame that encodes a large precursor protein. Upon infection, this protein precursor is processed into four structural (VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP4) and seven nonstructural (2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, 3C, and 3D) proteins (32). EV71 infection manifests most frequently as the childhood exanthema known as hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). Additionally, EV71 infection may cause neurological diseases, which include aseptic meningitis, brain stem and/or cerebellar encephalitis, and acute flaccid paralysis (32). Young children and infants are especially susceptible to EV71 infection. Since the initial recognition of EV71 in the United States, outbreaks have been reported in Southeast Asia, Europe, and Australia (1-3, 11, 14, 24, 30-32). Recently, large epidemics of HFMD occurred in the mainland of China (26, 42, 52).The mechanism of EV71 pathogenesis remains obscure. It is believed that immature or impaired immunity, upon EV71 infection, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality (7, 14, 17). In a murine infection model, lymphocyte as well as antibody responses reduce tissue viral loads and EV71 lethality (28). Notably, EV71 induces skin rash at the early stage and hind limb paralysis or death at the late stage. Oral infection leads to initial replication in the intestine and subsequent spread to various organs such as the spinal cord and the brain stem (8). Intriguingly, EV71 does not facilitate the production of type I interferon (IFN), a family of cytokines involved in first-line defense against virus infection. Indeed, administration of neutralizing antibody to IFN-α/β increases tissue viral loads and exacerbates the virus-induced disease (29).Type I IFN is produced in response to viral infections (22). For example, Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) in the endosome recognizes double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), where it recruits the adaptor Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-β (TRIF) (22). TRIF, together with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor 3 (TRAF3), then activates the two IKK-related kinases, TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) and inducible IκB kinase (IKKi), both of which phosphorylate interferon regulatory factor 3/7 (IRF3/7) (10, 13, 36, 45). IRF3 or IRF7, in turn, stimulates the expression of target genes, such as IFN-α/β (33, 37, 39, 51). In parallel, TRIF also induces NF-κB activation via TRAF6 (18, 19). In addition, alternative mechanisms exist in host cells to detect cytosolic nucleic acids. Two RNA helicases, retinoid acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5), recognize viral RNA present in the cytoplasm and subsequently recruit the adaptor IFN promoter-stimulating factor 1 (IPS-1; also called Cardif, MAVS, and VISA) (22, 23, 54). The interaction of IPS-1, TRAF3, and TBK1/IKKi activates IRF3/IRF7 and induces the expression of IFN-α/β while the interaction of IPS-1 with the Fas-associated protein-containing death domain (FADD) leads to NF-κB activation. It has been shown that MDA5 recognizes long double-stranded RNAs, such as in cells infected with picornaviruses, whereas RIG-I senses 5′ triphosphate single-stranded RNA with poly(U/A) motifs and short dsRNA in cells infected with a variety of RNA viruses (16, 20, 40, 43).The objective of this study was to investigate the interaction of EV71 with the type I IFN system. We demonstrate that, unlike Sendai virus or double-stranded RNA, EV71 does not stimulate the expression of antiviral genes in mammalian cells. Among structural and nonstructural proteins encoded by EV71, the 3C protein is able to inhibit virus-induced activation of the IFN-β promoter. We provide evidence that when expressed in mammalian cells, the 3C protein suppresses RIG-I signaling by disruption of the RIG-I-IPS-1 complex and IRF3 nuclear translocation. While H40, KFRDI, and VGK motifs are involved, the protease and RNA binding activities are dispensable. Collectively, these results suggest that control of RIG-I by the 3C protein impairs type I IFN responses, which may contribute to the pathogenesis of EV71 infection.     

Heavily Isotype-Dependent Protective Activities of Human Antibodies against Vaccinia Virus Extracellular Virion Antigen B5

Antibodies against the extracellular virion (EV or EEV) form of vaccinia virus are an important component of protective immunity in animal models and likely contribute to the protection of immunized humans against poxviruses. Using fully human monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), we now have shown that the protective attributes of the human anti-B5 antibody response to the smallpox vaccine (vaccinia virus) are heavily dependent on effector functions. By switching Fc domains of a single MAb, we have definitively shown that neutralization in vitro—and protection in vivo in a mouse model—by the human anti-B5 immunoglobulin G MAbs is isotype dependent, thereby demonstrating that efficient protection by these antibodies is not simply dependent on binding an appropriate vaccinia virion antigen with high affinity but in fact requires antibody effector function. The complement components C3 and C1q, but not C5, were required for neutralization. We also have demonstrated that human MAbs against B5 can potently direct complement-dependent cytotoxicity of vaccinia virus-infected cells. Each of these results was then extended to the polyclonal human antibody response to the smallpox vaccine. A model is proposed to explain the mechanism of EV neutralization. Altogether these findings enhance our understanding of the central protective activities of smallpox vaccine-elicited antibodies in immunized humans.The smallpox vaccine, live vaccinia virus (VACV), is frequently considered the gold standard of human vaccines and has been enormously effective in preventing smallpox disease. The smallpox vaccine led to the worldwide eradication of the disease via massive vaccination campaigns in the 1960s and 1970s, one of the greatest successes of modern medicine (30). However, despite the efficacy of the smallpox vaccine, the mechanisms of protection remain unclear. Understanding those mechanisms is key for developing immunologically sound vaccinology principles that can be applied to the design of future vaccines for other infectious diseases (3, 101).Clinical studies of fatal human cases of smallpox disease (variola virus infection) have shown that neutralizing antibody titers were either low or absent in patient serum (24, 68). In contrast, neutralizing antibody titers for the VACV intracellular mature virion (MV or IMV) were correlated with protection of vaccinees against smallpox (68). VACV immune globulin (VIG) (human polyclonal antibodies) is a promising treatment against smallpox (47), since it was able to reduce the number of smallpox cases ∼80% among variola-exposed individuals in four case-controlled clinical studies (43, 47, 52, 53, 69). In animal studies, neutralizing antibodies are crucial for protecting primates and mice against pathogenic poxviruses (3, 7, 17, 21, 27, 35, 61, 66, 85).The specificities and the functions of protective antipoxvirus antibodies have been areas of intensive research, and the mechanics of poxvirus neutralization have been debated for years. There are several interesting features and problems associated with the antibody response to variola virus and related poxviruses, including the large size of the viral particles and the various abundances of many distinct surface proteins (18, 75, 91, 93). Furthermore, poxviruses have two distinct virion forms, intracellular MV and extracellular enveloped virions (EV or EEV), each with a unique biology. Most importantly, MV and EV virions share no surface proteins (18, 93), and therefore, there is no single neutralizing antibody that can neutralize both virion forms. As such, an understanding of virion structure is required to develop knowledge regarding the targets of protective antibodies.Neutralizing antibodies confer protection mainly through the recognition of antigens on the surface of a virus. A number of groups have discovered neutralizing antibody targets of poxviruses in animals and humans (3). The relative roles of antibodies against MV and EV in protective immunity still remain somewhat unclear. There are compelling data that antibodies against MV (21, 35, 39, 66, 85, 90, 91) or EV (7, 16, 17, 36, 66, 91) are sufficient for protection, and a combination of antibodies against both targets is most protective (66). It remains controversial whether antibodies to one virion form are more important than those to the other (3, 61, 66). The most abundant viral particles are MV, which accumulate in infected cells and are released as cells die (75). Neutralization of MV is relatively well characterized (3, 8, 21, 35). EV, while less abundant, are critical for viral spread and virulence in vivo (93, 108). Neutralization of EV has remained more enigmatic (3).B5R (also known as B5 or WR187), one of five known EV-specific proteins, is highly conserved among different strains of VACV and in other orthopoxviruses (28, 49). B5 was identified as a protective antigen by Galmiche et al., and the available evidence indicated that the protection was mediated by anti-B5 antibodies (36). Since then, a series of studies have examined B5 as a potential recombinant vaccine antigen or as a target of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (1, 2, 7, 17, 40, 46, 66, 91, 110). It is known that humans immunized with the smallpox vaccine make antibodies against B5 (5, 22, 62, 82). It is also known that animals receiving the smallpox vaccine generate antibodies against B5 (7, 20, 27, 70). Furthermore, previous neutralization assays have indicated that antibodies generated against B5 are primarily responsible for neutralization of VACV EV (5, 83). Recently Chen at al. generated chimpanzee-human fusion MAbs against B5 and showed that the MAbs can protect mice from lethal challenge with virulent VACV (17). We recently reported, in connection with a study using murine monoclonal antibodies, that neutralization of EV is highly complement dependent and the ability of anti-B5 MAbs to protect in vivo correlated with their ability to neutralize EV in a complement-dependent manner (7).The focus of the study described here was to elucidate the mechanisms of EV neutralization, focusing on the human antibody response to B5. Our overall goal is to understand underlying immunobiological and virological parameters that determine the emergence of protective antiviral immune responses in humans.     

Interaction of decay-accelerating factor with echovirus 7

Echovirus 7 (EV7) belongs to the Enterovirus genus within the family Picornaviridae. Many picornaviruses use IgG-like receptors that bind in the viral canyon and are required to initiate viral uncoating during infection. However, in addition, some of the enteroviruses use an alternative or additional receptor that binds outside the canyon. Decay-accelerating factor (DAF) has been identified as a cellular receptor for EV7. The crystal structure of EV7 has been determined to 3.1-Å resolution and used to interpret the 7.2-Å-resolution cryo-electron microscopy reconstruction of EV7 complexed with DAF. Each DAF binding site on EV7 is near a 2-fold icosahedral symmetry axis, which differs from the binding site of DAF on the surface of coxsackievirus B3, indicating that there are independent evolutionary processes by which DAF was selected as a picornavirus accessory receptor. This suggests that there is an advantage for these viruses to recognize DAF during the initial process of infection.Echoviruses (EVs) belong to the family Picornaviridae, which contains some of the most common viral pathogens of vertebrates (43, 50, 51, 55, 58, 63). Picornaviruses are small, icosahedral, nonenveloped animal viruses. Their capsids have 60 copies each of four viral proteins, VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP4, that form an ∼300-Å-diameter icosahedral shell filled with a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA genome. A distinctive feature of the capsid surface is a depression around the 5-fold axes of symmetry, called the “canyon” (47). The results of both genetic and structural studies have shown that the canyon is the site of receptor binding for many of these viruses (4, 11, 23, 25, 36, 47, 68), including echoviruses, which utilize β-integrins (6, 33, 66). Receptor molecules that bind in the canyon have been found to belong to the immunoglobulin superfamily (49). When these receptor molecules bind within the canyon, they dislodge a “pocket factor” within a pocket immediately below the surface of the canyon. The shape and environment of the pocket factor suggest that it might be a lipid (13, 32, 45, 54). When a receptor binds within the canyon, it depresses the floor of the canyon, corresponding to the roof of the pocket. Similarly, when a lipid or antiviral compound binds to the pocket, it expands the roof of the pocket, corresponding to the floor of the canyon (39, 45). Thus, receptors that bind to the canyon and the pocket factor compete with each other for binding to the virus. An absence of the hydrophobic pocket factor destabilizes the virus and initiates transition to altered “A” particles, a likely prelude to uncoating of the virion, possibly during passage through an endosomal vesicle (45).Not all receptors of picornaviruses bind in the canyon. A minor group of human rhinoviruses (HRV) bind to the low-density-lipoprotein receptor family (17, 34, 61, 62), and some other picornaviruses, including certain coxsackie- and echoviruses, utilize decay-accelerating factor (DAF; also called CD55) as a cellular receptor (9, 28, 40, 52).DAF is a member of a family of proteins that regulate complement activation by binding to and accelerating the decay of both classical and alternative pathway C3 and C5 convertases (7, 18, 26), the central amplification enzymes of the complement cascade. DAF is expressed on virtually all cell surfaces, protecting self cells from the immune system by rapidly dissociating any convertases that assemble, thereby halting the progression of a complement attack directed at the cell. Recent work (15, 27, 29, 56) has shown that DAF also participates in T-cell antiviral immunity (56) and protects against T-cell autoimmunity (29) by regulating complement that is produced locally by immune cells. The functional region of DAF consists of four short consensus repeats (SCR1, -2, -3, and -4). The structures have been determined for the SCR2-SCR3 fragment, the SCR3-SCR4 fragment, and the full four-domain region (30, 60, 65). Each of the SCR domains contains about 60 residues and is folded into a β structure stabilized by disulfide bridges. The four SCR domains form a relatively rigid extended rod with dimensions of 160 by 50 by 30 Å (30). The four domains rise about 180 Å above the plasma membrane, on a serine- and threonine-rich stalk of 94 amino acids, 11 of which are O-glycosylated, and is attached to the plasma membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor.Structural and genetic studies have shown that closely related picornaviruses have adapted to bind to DAF at different sites on the receptor surface (9, 31, 38, 42, 52, 64). Although DAF binding is likely to facilitate viral adsorption, the availability of DAF receptor molecules on the host is normally not sufficient for echovirus 7 (EV7) to enter cells. Presumably, viral adaptation to bind DAF offers some advantage to the virus, such as increasing the efficiency of infection.In an earlier publication (14), a 16-Å-resolution cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) density map of the EV7-DAF complex was interpreted with the homologous structures of coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) for EV7 (74% sequence identity) and virus complement protein for DAF (25% sequence identity). Because of the limited resolution of the earlier cryo-EM reconstruction, it was concluded that DAF bound to EV7 by laying across the icosahedral 2-fold axes. This implied that there were two alternative DAF binding modes occupying the same site, but with DAF oriented in opposite directions, and that only one of these alternative sites could be occupied at a time. Here we describe an improved, 7.2-Å-resolution cryo-EM reconstruction of DAF bound to EV7 and 3.1-Å-resolution X-ray crystal structures of EV7. Together with previously determined structures of DAF (30), we now show that 2-fold axis-related DAF molecules bind close to the icosahedral 2-fold axes on the viral surface but (in contradiction to the earlier results and consistent with predictions made by Pettigrew et al. [38]) do not cross these axes. This is consistent with the results of DAF binding to EV12, which binds DAF similarly to the manner reported here and also predicted for EV7 (38). Thus, the binding modes of DAF to EV12 and EV7 are now shown to be similar, but not the same, and are completely different from the binding mode of DAF to CVB3.     

Cell-to-Cell Spread of the RNA Interference Response Suppresses Semliki Forest Virus (SFV) Infection of Mosquito Cell Cultures and Cannot Be Antagonized by SFV

In their vertebrate hosts, arboviruses such as Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (Togaviridae) generally counteract innate defenses and trigger cell death. In contrast, in mosquito cells, following an early phase of efficient virus production, a persistent infection with low levels of virus production is established. Whether arboviruses counteract RNA interference (RNAi), which provides an important antiviral defense system in mosquitoes, is an important question. Here we show that in Aedes albopictus-derived mosquito cells, SFV cannot prevent the establishment of an antiviral RNAi response or prevent the spread of protective antiviral double-stranded RNA/small interfering RNA (siRNA) from cell to cell, which can inhibit the replication of incoming virus. The expression of tombusvirus siRNA-binding protein p19 by SFV strongly enhanced virus spread between cultured cells rather than virus replication in initially infected cells. Our results indicate that the spread of the RNAi signal contributes to limiting virus dissemination.In animals, RNA interference (RNAi) was first described for Caenorhabditis elegans (27). The production or introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in cells leads to the degradation of mRNAs containing homologous sequences by sequence-specific cleavage of mRNAs. Central to RNAi is the production of 21- to 26-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) from dsRNA and the assembly of an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), followed by the degradation of the target mRNA (23, 84). RNAi is a known antiviral strategy of plants (3, 53) and insects (21, 39, 51). Study of Drosophila melanogaster in particular has given important insights into RNAi responses against pathogenic viruses and viral RNAi inhibitors (31, 54, 83, 86, 91). RNAi is well characterized for Drosophila, and orthologs of antiviral RNAi genes have been found in Aedes and Culex spp. (13, 63).Arboviruses, or arthropod-borne viruses, are RNA viruses mainly of the families Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Togaviridae. The genus Alphavirus within the family Togaviridae contains several mosquito-borne pathogens: arboviruses such as Chikungunya virus (16) and equine encephalitis viruses (88). Replication of the prototype Sindbis virus and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is well understood (44, 71, 74, 79). Their genome consists of a positive-stranded RNA with a 5′ cap and a 3′ poly(A) tail. The 5′ two-thirds encodes the nonstructural polyprotein P1234, which is cleaved into four replicase proteins, nsP1 to nsP4 (47, 58, 60). The structural polyprotein is encoded in the 3′ one-third of the genome and cleaved into capsid and glycoproteins after translation from a subgenomic mRNA (79). Cytoplasmic replication complexes are associated with cellular membranes (71). Viruses mature by budding at the plasma membrane (35).In nature, arboviruses are spread by arthropod vectors (predominantly mosquitoes, ticks, flies, and midges) to vertebrate hosts (87). Little is known about how arthropod cells react to arbovirus infection. In mosquito cell cultures, an acute phase with efficient virus production is generally followed by the establishment of a persistent infection with low levels of virus production (9). This is fundamentally different from the cytolytic events following arbovirus interactions with mammalian cells and pathogenic insect viruses with insect cells. Alphaviruses encode host response antagonists for mammalian cells (2, 7, 34, 38).RNAi has been described for mosquitoes (56) and, when induced before infection, antagonizes arboviruses and their replicons (1, 4, 14, 15, 29, 30, 32, 42, 64, 65). RNAi is also functional in various mosquito cell lines (1, 8, 43, 49, 52). In the absence of RNAi, alphavirus and flavivirus replication and/or dissemination is enhanced in both mosquitoes and Drosophila (14, 17, 31, 45, 72). RNAi inhibitors weakly enhance SFV replicon replication in tick and mosquito cells (5, 33), posing the questions of how, when, and where RNAi interferes with alphavirus infection in mosquito cells.Here we use an A. albopictus-derived mosquito cell line to study RNAi responses to SFV. Using reporter-based assays, we demonstrate that SFV cannot avoid or efficiently inhibit the establishment of an RNAi response. We also demonstrate that the RNAi signal can spread between mosquito cells. SFV cannot inhibit cell-to-cell spread of the RNAi signal, and spread of the virus-induced RNAi signal (dsRNA/siRNA) can inhibit the replication of incoming SFV in neighboring cells. Furthermore, we show that SFV expression of a siRNA-binding protein increases levels of virus replication mainly by enhancing virus spread between cells rather than replication in initially infected cells. Taken together, these findings suggest a novel mechanism, cell-to-cell spread of antiviral dsRNA/siRNA, by which RNAi limits SFV dissemination in mosquito cells.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

Clonal Relationship among Atypical Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Different Animal Species and Humans

Forty-nine typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) strains belonging to different serotypes and isolated from humans, pets (cats and dogs), farm animals (bovines, sheep, and rabbits), and wild animals (monkeys) were investigated for virulence markers and clonal similarity by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The virulence markers analyzed revealed that atypical EPEC strains isolated from animals have the potential to cause diarrhea in humans. A close clonal relationship between human and animal isolates was found by MLST and PFGE. These results indicate that these animals act as atypical EPEC reservoirs and may represent sources of infection for humans. Since humans also act as a reservoir of atypical EPEC strains, the cycle of mutual infection of atypical EPEC between animals and humans, mainly pets and their owners, cannot be ruled out since the transmission dynamics between the reservoirs are not yet clearly understood.Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) strains are among the major causes of infantile diarrhea in developing countries (71) and can be classified as typical and atypical, depending on the presence or absence of the E. coli adherence factor plasmid (pEAF), respectively (39).The pathogenesis of EPEC resides in the ability to cause the attaching and effacing (A/E) lesion in the gut mucosa of human or animal hosts, leading to diarrheal illness (40). The genes responsible for the A/E lesion formation are located in a chromosomal pathogenicity island of ∼35 kb, known as the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) (23, 47). LEE encodes an adhesin called intimin (38), its translocated receptor (Tir) (42), components of a type III secretion system (36), and effector molecules, named E. coli-secreted proteins (Esp proteins) (41). These virulence factors have a crucial role in A/E lesion formation, and their detection in EPEC strains is an indicator of their potential to produce these lesions (19, 56).Atypical EPEC strains have been associated with diarrhea outbreaks in developed countries (31, 73, 77) and with sporadic cases of diarrhea in developing and developed countries (1, 12, 26, 52, 55). At present, the prevalence of atypical EPEC is higher than that of typical EPEC in several countries (1, 12, 26, 52, 55, 65).Different from the situation in developed countries, where atypical EPEC outbreaks and sporadic infections are associated with children and adults, atypical EPEC infection in Brazil is mainly associated with children''s illnesses (32, 71).Typical EPEC strains are rarely isolated from animals, and humans are the major natural reservoir for these pathogens (14, 32, 53, 71). In contrast, atypical EPEC strains are present in both healthy and diseased animals (dog, monkey, cats, and bovines) and humans (4, 6, 18, 28, 71). Some studies have associated pets and farm and wild animals as reservoirs and infection sources of atypical EPEC strains for humans (32). However, these studies did not compare atypical EPEC strains isolated from humans and animals by gold-standard molecular methods like multilocus sequence typing (MLST) or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (15, 35, 43, 53). For this reason, there are some doubts about whether atypical EPEC strains isolated from animals represent risks for human health and whether animals really play the role of reservoirs of atypical EPEC.The aim of this study was to compare atypical EPEC strains isolated from humans and different animals, including pets (cats and dogs), farm animals (bovines, ovines, and rabbits), and wild animals (monkeys), by molecular phylogenetic techniques to verify the role of animals as reservoirs of and sources of infection with atypical EPEC in humans.     

Characterization of Lassa Virus Glycoprotein Oligomerization and Influence of Cholesterol on Virus Replication

Mature glycoprotein spikes are inserted in the Lassa virus envelope and consist of the distal subunit GP-1, the transmembrane-spanning subunit GP-2, and the signal peptide, which originate from the precursor glycoprotein pre-GP-C by proteolytic processing. In this study, we analyzed the oligomeric structure of the viral surface glycoprotein. Chemical cross-linking studies of mature glycoprotein spikes from purified virus revealed the formation of trimers. Interestingly, sucrose density gradient analysis of cellularly expressed glycoprotein showed that in contrast to trimeric mature glycoprotein complexes, the noncleaved glycoprotein forms monomers and oligomers spanning a wide size range, indicating that maturation cleavage of GP by the cellular subtilase SKI-1/S1P is critical for formation of the correct oligomeric state. To shed light on a potential relation between cholesterol and GP trimer stability, we performed cholesterol depletion experiments. Although depletion of cholesterol had no effect on trimerization of the glycoprotein spike complex, our studies revealed that the cholesterol content of the viral envelope is important for the infectivity of Lassa virus. Analyses of the distribution of viral proteins in cholesterol-rich detergent-resistant membrane areas showed that Lassa virus buds from membrane areas other than those responsible for impaired infectivity due to cholesterol depletion of lipid rafts. Thus, derivation of the viral envelope from cholesterol-rich membrane areas is not a prerequisite for the impact of cholesterol on virus infectivity.Lassa virus (LASV) is a member of the family Arenaviridae, of which Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) is the prototype. Arenaviruses comprise more than 20 species, divided into the Old World and New World virus complexes (19). The Old World arenaviruses include the human pathogenic LASV strains, Lujo virus, which was first identified in late 2008 and is associated with an unprecedented high case fatality rate in humans, the nonhuman pathogenic Ippy, Mobala, and Mopeia viruses, and the recently described Kodoko virus (10, 30, 49). The New World virus complex contains, among others, the South American hemorrhagic fever-causing viruses Junín virus, Machupo virus, Guanarito virus, Sabiá virus, and the recently discovered Chapare virus (22).Arenaviruses contain a bisegmented single-stranded RNA genome encoding the polymerase L, matrix protein Z, nucleoprotein NP, and glycoprotein GP. The bipartite ribonucleoprotein of LASV is surrounded by a lipid envelope derived from the plasma membrane of the host cell. The matrix protein Z has been identified as a major budding factor, which lines the interior of the viral lipid membrane, in which GP spikes are inserted (61, 75). The glycoprotein is synthesized as precursor protein pre-GP-C and is cotranslationally cleaved by signal peptidase into GP-C and the signal peptide, which exhibits unusual length, stability, and topology (3, 27, 28, 33, 70, 87). Moreover, the arenaviral signal peptide functions as trans-acting maturation factor (2, 26, 33). After processing by signal peptidase, GP-C of both New World and Old World arenaviruses is cleaved by the cellular subtilase subtilisin kexin isozyme-1/site-1 protease (SKI-1/S1P) into the distal subunit GP-1 and the membrane-anchored subunit GP-2 within the secretory pathway (5, 52, 63). For LCMV, it has been shown that GP-1 subunits are linked to each other by disulfide bonds and are noncovalently connected to GP-2 subunits (14, 24, 31). GP-1 is responsible for binding to the host cell receptor, while GP-2 mediates fusion between the virus envelope and the endosomal membrane at low pH due to a bipartite fusion peptide near the amino terminus (24, 36, 44). Sequence analysis of the LCMV GP-2 ectodomain revealed two heptad repeats that most likely form amphipathic helices important for this process (34, 86).In general, viral class I fusion proteins have triplets of α-helical structures in common, which contain heptad repeats (47, 73). In contrast, class II fusion proteins are characterized by β-sheets that form dimers in the prefusion status and trimers in the postfusion status (43). The class III fusion proteins are trimers that, unlike class I fusion proteins, were not proteolytically processed N-terminally of the fusion peptide, resulting in a fusion-active membrane-anchored subunit (39, 62). Previous studies with LCMV described a tetrameric organization of the glycoprotein spikes (14), while more recent data using a bacterially expressed truncated ectodomain of the LCMV GP-2 subunit pointed toward a trimeric spike structure (31). Due to these conflicting data regarding the oligomerization status of LCMV GP, it remains unclear to which class of fusion proteins the arenaviral glycoproteins belong.The state of oligomerization and the correct conformation of viral glycoproteins are crucial for membrane fusion during virus entry. The early steps of infection have been shown for several viruses to be dependent on the cholesterol content of the participating membranes (i.e., either the virus envelope or the host cell membrane) (4, 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, 40, 42, 53, 56, 76, 78, 79). In fact, it has been shown previously that entry of both LASV and LCMV is susceptible to cholesterol depletion of the target host cell membrane using methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) treatment (64, 71). Moreover, cholesterol not only plays an important role in the early steps during entry in the viral life cycle but also is critical in the virus assembly and release process. Several viruses of various families, including influenza virus, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), measles virus, and Ebola virus, use the ordered environment of lipid raft microdomains. Due to their high levels of glycosphingolipids and cholesterol, these domains are characterized by insolubility in nonionic detergents under cold conditions (60, 72). Recent observations have suggested that budding of the New World arenavirus Junin virus occurs from detergent-soluble membrane areas (1). Assembly and release from distinct membrane microdomains that are detergent soluble have also been described for vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) (12, 38, 68). At present, however, it is not known whether LASV requires cholesterol in its viral envelope for successful virus entry or whether specific membrane microdomains are important for LASV assembly and release.In this study, we first investigated the oligomeric state of the premature and mature LASV glycoprotein complexes. Since it has been shown for several membrane proteins that the oligomerization and conformation are dependent on cholesterol (58, 59, 76, 78), we further analyzed the dependence of the cholesterol content of the virus envelope on glycoprotein oligomerization and virus infectivity. Finally, we characterized the lipid membrane areas from which LASV is released.     

Trafficking of UL37 Proteins into Mitochondrion-Associated Membranes during Permissive Human Cytomegalovirus Infection

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL37 proteins traffic sequentially from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the mitochondria. In transiently transfected cells, UL37 proteins traffic into the mitochondrion-associated membranes (MAM), the site of contact between the ER and mitochondria. In HCMV-infected cells, the predominant UL37 exon 1 protein, pUL37x1, trafficked into the ER, the MAM, and the mitochondria. Surprisingly, a component of the MAM calcium signaling junction complex, cytosolic Grp75, was increasingly enriched in heavy MAM from HCMV-infected cells. These studies show the first documented case of a herpesvirus protein, HCMV pUL37x1, trafficking into the MAM during permissive infection and HCMV-induced alteration of the MAM protein composition.The human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL37 immediate early (IE) locus expresses multiple products, including the predominant UL37 exon 1 protein, pUL37x1, also known as viral mitochondrion-localized inhibitor of apoptosis (vMIA), during lytic infection (16, 22, 24, 39, 44). The UL37 glycoprotein (gpUL37) shares UL37x1 sequences and is internally cleaved, generating pUL37_NH2 and gpUL37_COOH (2, 22, 25, 26). pUL37x1 is essential for the growth of HCMV in humans (17) and for the growth of primary HCMV strains (20) and strain AD169 (14, 35, 39, 49) but not strain TownevarATCC in permissive human fibroblasts (HFFs) (27).pUL37x1 induces calcium (Ca²⁺) efflux from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (39), regulates viral early gene expression (5, 10), disrupts F-actin (34, 39), recruits and inactivates Bax at the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) (4, 31-33), and inhibits mitochondrial serine protease at late times of infection (28).Intriguingly, HCMV UL37 proteins localize dually in the ER and in the mitochondria (2, 9, 16, 17, 24-26). In contrast to other characterized, similarly localized proteins (3, 6, 11, 23, 30, 38), dual-trafficking UL37 proteins are noncompetitive and sequential, as an uncleaved gpUL37 mutant protein is ER translocated, N-glycosylated, and then imported into the mitochondria (24, 26).Ninety-nine percent of ∼1,000 mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and directly imported into the mitochondria (13). However, the mitochondrial import of ER-synthesized proteins is poorly understood. One potential pathway is the use of the mitochondrion-associated membrane (MAM) as a transfer waypoint. The MAM is a specialized ER subdomain enriched in lipid-synthetic enzymes, lipid-associated proteins, such as sigma-1 receptor, and chaperones (18, 45). The MAM, the site of contact between the ER and the mitochondria, permits the translocation of membrane-bound lipids, including ceramide, between the two organelles (40). The MAM also provides enriched Ca²⁺ microdomains for mitochondrial signaling (15, 36, 37, 43, 48). One macromolecular MAM complex involved in efficient ER-to-mitochondrion Ca²⁺ transfer is comprised of ER-bound inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor 3 (IP3R3), cytosolic Grp75, and a MOM-localized voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) (42). Another MAM-stabilizing protein complex utilizes mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) to tether ER and mitochondrial organelles together (12).HCMV UL37 proteins traffic into the MAM of transiently transfected HFFs and HeLa cells, directed by their NH₂-terminal leaders (8, 47). To determine whether the MAM is targeted by UL37 proteins during infection, we fractionated HCMV-infected cells and examined pUL37x1 trafficking in microsomes, mitochondria, and the MAM throughout all temporal phases of infection. Because MAM domains physically bridge two organelles, multiple markers were employed to verify the purity and identity of the fractions (7, 8, 19, 46, 47).(These studies were performed in part by Chad Williamson in partial fulfillment of his doctoral studies in the Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Program at George Washington Institute of Biomedical Sciences.)HFFs and life-extended (LE)-HFFs were grown and not infected or infected with HCMV (strain AD169) at a multiplicity of 3 PFU/cell as previously described (8, 26, 47). Heavy (6,300 × g) and light (100,000 × g) MAM fractions, mitochondria, and microsomes were isolated at various times of infection and quantified as described previously (7, 8, 47). Ten- or 20-μg amounts of total lysate or of subcellular fractions were resolved by SDS-PAGE in 4 to 12% Bis-Tris NuPage gels (Invitrogen) and examined by Western analyses (7, 8, 26). Twenty-microgram amounts of the fractions were not treated or treated with proteinase K (3 μg) for 20 min on ice, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and probed by Western analysis. The blots were probed with rabbit anti-UL37x1 antiserum (DC35), goat anti-dolichyl phosphate mannose synthase 1 (DPM1), goat anti-COX2 (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti-Grp75 (StressGen Biotechnologies), and the corresponding horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (8, 47). Reactive proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Pierce), and images were digitized as described previously (26, 47).     

Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Promotes Rho-Dependent Focal Adhesion Formation by Suppressing p190A RhoGAP

Cell migration is critical for normal development and for pathological processes including cancer cell metastasis. Dynamic remodeling of focal adhesions and the actin cytoskeleton are crucial determinants of cell motility. The Rho family and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) module consisting of MEK-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) are important regulators of these processes, but mechanisms for the integration of these signals during spreading and motility are incompletely understood. Here we show that ERK activity is required for fibronectin-stimulated Rho-GTP loading, Rho-kinase function, and the maturation of focal adhesions in spreading cells. We identify p190A RhoGAP as a major target for ERK signaling in adhesion assembly and identify roles for ERK phosphorylation of the C terminus in p190A localization and activity. These observations reveal a novel role for ERK signaling in adhesion assembly in addition to its established role in adhesion disassembly.Cell migration is a highly coordinated process essential for physiological and pathological processes (69). Signaling through Rho family GTPases (e.g., Rac, Cdc42, and Rho) is crucial for cell migration. Activated Rac and Cdc42 are involved in the production of a dominant lamellipodium and filopodia, respectively, whereas Rho-stimulated contractile forces are required for tail retraction and to maintain adhesion to the matrix (57, 58, 68). Rac- and Cdc42-dependent membrane protrusions are driven by the actin cytoskeleton and the formation of peripheral focal complexes; Rho activation stabilizes protrusions by stimulating the formation of mature focal adhesions and stress fibers. Active Rho influences cytoskeletal dynamics through effectors including the Rho kinases (ROCKs) (2, 3).Rho activity is stimulated by GEFs that promote GTP binding and attenuated by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that enhance Rho''s intrinsic GTPase activity. However, due to the large number of RhoGEFs and RhoGAPs expressed in mammalian cells, the molecular mechanisms responsible for regulation of Rho activity in time and space are incompletely understood. p190A RhoGAP (hereafter p190A) is implicated in adhesion and migration signaling. p190A contains an N-terminal GTPase domain, a large middle domain juxtaposed to the C-terminal GAP domain, and a short C-terminal tail (74). The C-terminal tail of ∼50 amino acids is divergent between p190A and the closely related family member p190B (14) and thus may specify the unique functional roles for p190A and p190B revealed in gene knockout studies (10, 11, 41, 77, 78). p190A activity is dynamically regulated in response to external cues during cell adhesion and migration (5, 6, 59). Arthur et al. (5) reported that p190A activity is required for the transient decrease in RhoGTP levels seen in fibroblasts adhering to fibronectin. p190A activity is positively regulated by tyrosine phosphorylation (4, 5, 8, 17, 31, 39, 40, 42): phosphorylation at Y1105 promotes its association with p120RasGAP and subsequent recruitment to membranes or cytoskeleton (8, 17, 27, 31, 71, 75, 84). However, Y1105 phosphorylation is alone insufficient to activate p190A GAP activity (39). While the functions of p190A can be irreversibly terminated by ubiquitinylation in a cell-cycle-dependent manner (80), less is known about reversible mechanisms that negatively regulate p190A GAP activity during adhesion and motility.The integration of Rho family GTPase and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling is important for cell motility (48, 50, 63, 76, 79). Several studies have demonstrated a requirement for ERK signaling in the disassembly of focal adhesions in migrating cells, in part through the activation of calpain proteases (36, 37) that can downregulate focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling (15), locally suppress Rho activity (52), and sever cytoskeletal linkers to focal adhesions (7, 33). Inhibition of ERK signaling increases focal adhesion size and retards disassembly of focal adhesions in adherent cells (57, 64, 85, 86). It is also recognized that ERK modulates Rho-dependent cellular processes, including membrane protrusion and migration (18, 25, 64, 86). Interestingly, ERK activated in response to acute fibronectin stimulation localizes not only to mature focal adhesions, but also to peripheral focal complexes (32, 76). Since these complexes can either mature or be turned over (12), ERK may play a distinct role in focal adhesion assembly. ERK is proposed to promote focal adhesion formation by activating myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) (21, 32, 50).Here we find that ERK activity is required for Rho activation and focal adhesion formation during adhesion to fibronectin and that p190A is an essential target of ERK signaling in this context. Inspection of the p190A C terminus reveals a number of consensus ERK sites and indeed p190A is phosphorylated by recombinant ERK only on its C terminus in vitro, and on the same C-terminal peptide in vivo. Mutation of the C-terminal ERK phosphorylation sites to alanine increases the biochemical and biological activity of p190A. Finally, inhibition of MEK or mutation of the C-terminal phosphorylation sites enhances retention of p190A in peripheral membranes during spreading on fibronectin. Our data support the conclusion that ERK phosphorylation inhibits p190A allowing increases in RhoGTP and cytoskeletal changes necessary for focal adhesion formation.