Conservation of relative chromosome positioning in normal and cancer cells

Chromosomes exist in the interphase nucleus as individual chromosome territories. It is unclear to what extent chromosome territories occupy particular positions with respect to each other and how structural rearrangements, such as translocations, affect chromosome organization within the cell nucleus. Here we analyze the relative interphase positioning of chromosomes in mouse lymphoma cells compared to normal splenocytes. We show that in a lymphoma cell line derived from an ATM(-/-) mouse, two translocated chromosomes are preferentially positioned in close proximity to each other. The relative position of the chromosomes involved in these translocations is conserved in normal splenocytes. Relative positioning of chromosomes in normal splenocytes is not due to their random distribution in the interphase nucleus and persists during mitosis. These observations demonstrate that the relative arrangement of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus can be conserved between normal and cancer cells and our data support the notion that physical proximity facilitates rearrangements between chromosomes.     

How do meiotic chromosomes meet their homologous partners?: lessons from fission yeast

Homologous chromosome pairing is required for proper chromosome segregation and recombination during meiosis. The mechanism by which a pair of homologous chromosomes contact each other to establish pairing is not fully understood. When pairing occurs during meiotic prophase in the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the nucleus oscillates between the cell poles and telomeres remain clustered at the leading edge of the moving nucleus. These meiosis-specific activities produce movements of telomere-bundled chromosomes. Several lines of evidence suggest that these movements facilitate homologous chromosome pairing by aligning homologous chromosomes and promoting contact between homologous regions. Since telomere clustering and nuclear or chromosome movements in meiotic prophase have been observed in a wide range of eukaryotic organisms, it is suggested that telomere-mediated chromosome movements are general activities that facilitate homologous chromosome pairing.     

Specific staining of human chromosomes in Chinese hamster x man hybrid cell lines demonstrates interphase chromosome territories

Summary In spite of Carl Rabl's (1885) and Theodor Boveri's (1909) early hypothesis that chromosomes occupy discrete territories or domains within the interphase nucleus, evidence in favor pf this hypothesis has been limited and indirect so far in higher plants and animals. The alternative possibility that the chromatin fiber of single chromosomes might be extended throughout the major part of even the whole interphase nucleus has been considered for many years. In the latter case, chromosomes would only exist as discrete chromatin bodies during mitosis but not during interphase. Both possibilities are compatible with Boveri's well established paradigm of chromosome individuality. Here we show that an active human X chromosome contained as the only human chromosome in a Chinese hamster x man hybrid cell line can be visualized both in metaphse plates and in interphase nuclei after in situ hybridization with either ³H- or biotin-labeled human genomic DNA. We demonstrate that this chromosome is organized as a distinct chromatin body throughout interphase. In addition, evidence for the territorial organization of human chromosomes is also presented for another hybrid cell line containing several autosomes and the human X chromosome. These findings are discussed in the context of our present knowledge of the organization and topography of interphase chromosomes. General applications of a strategy aimed at specific staining of individual chromosomes in experimental and clinical cytogenetics are briefly considered.     

Rise, fall and resurrection of chromosome territories: a historical perspective. Part I. The rise of chromosome territories

It is now generally accepted that chromosomes in the cell nucleus are organized in distinct domains, first called chromosome territories in 1909 by the great cytologist Theodor Boveri. Yet, even today chromosomes have remained enigmatic individuals, whose structures, arrangements and functions in cycling and post-mitotic cells still need to be explored in full detail. Whereas numerous recent reviews describe present evidence for a dynamic architecture of chromosome territories and discuss the potential significance within the functional compartmentalization of the nucleus, a comprehensive historical account of this important concept of nuclear organization was lacking so far. Here, we describe the early rise of chromosome territories within the context of the discovery of chromosomes and their fundamental role in heredity, covering a period from the 1870th to the early 20th century (part I, this volume). In part II (next volume) we review the abandonment of the chromosome territory concept during the 1950th to 1980th and the compelling evidence, which led to its resurrection during the 1970th to 1980th.     

Nuclear and territorial topography of chromosome telomeres in human lymphocytes

Nuclear and territorial positioning of p- and q-telomeres and centromeres of chromosomes 3, 8, 9, 13, and 19 were studied by repeated fluorescence in situ hybridization, high-resolution cytometry, and three-dimensional image analysis in human blood lymphocytes before and after stimulation. Telomeres were found on the opposite side of the territories as compared with the centromeres for all chromosome territories investigated. Mutual distances between telomeres of submetacentric chromosomes were very short, usually shorter than centromere-to-telomere distances, which means that the chromosome territory is nonrandomly folded. Telomeres are, on average, much nearer to the center of the cell nucleus than centromeres; q-telomeres were found, on average, more centrally localized as compared with p-telomeres. Consequently, we directly showed that chromosome territories in the cell nucleus are (1) polar and (2) partially oriented in cell nuclei. The distributions of genetic elements relative to chromosome territories (territorial distributions) can be either narrower or broader than their nuclear distributions, which reflects the degree of adhesion of an element to the territory or to the nucleus. We found no tethering of heterologous telomeres of chromosomes 8, 9, and 19. In contrast, both pairs of homologous telomeres of chromosome 19 (but not in other chromosomes) are tethered (associated) very frequently.     

SCHIP: statistics for chromosome interphase positioning based on interchange data

MOTIVATION: The position of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus is believed to be associated with a number of biological processes. Here, we present a web-based application that helps analyze the relative position of chromosomes during interphase in human cells, based on observed radiogenic chromosome aberrations. The inputs of the program are a table of yields of pairwise chromosome interchanges and a proposed chromosome geometric cluster. Each can either be uploaded or selected from provided datasets. The main outputs are P-values for the proposed chromosome clusters. SCHIP is designed to be used by a number of scientific communities interested in nuclear architecture, including cancer and cell biologists, radiation biologists and mathematical/computational biologists.     

Chromosome territories--a functional nuclear landscape

Understanding nuclear architecture is indispensable for understanding the cell-type-dependent orchestration of active and silent genes and other nuclear functions, such as RNA splicing, DNA replication and repair. Yet, while it is now generally agreed that chromosomes in the cell nucleus are organized as chromosome territories, present models of chromosome territory architecture differ widely with respect to the possible functional implications of dynamic changes of this architecture during the cell cycle and terminal cell differentiation.     

B Chromosome Behavior in Maize Pollen as Determined by a Molecular Probe

The B chromosomes of maize typically undergo nondisjunction during the second microspore division (generative cell division). When the microspore nucleus contains only one B chromosome, two kinds of sperm result, one with two B chromosomes and one with no B chromosomes. The sperm with the B chromosomes preferentially fertilizes the egg cell. Previous studies of these phenomena have been limited to genetic analysis and chromosome spreads. In this study we show that a B chromosome-specific probe can be used with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis to detect the presence, location, and frequency of B chromosomes in intact interphase nuclei within mature pollen of maize. Using genetic line TB-10L18, our results indicate that nondisjunction of the B centromere occurs at an average frequency of 56.6%, based on four plants and 1306 pollen grains analyzed. This is consistent with the results of genetic studies using the same B-A translocation. In addition, our results suggest that B chromosome nondisjunction can occur during the first microspore division. Spatial distribution of the B chromosome-specific probe appears to be largely confined to one tip of the sperm nucleus, and a DNA fragment found outside the pollen nuclei often hybridizes to the B chromosome-specific probe.     

Internuclear transfer of genetic information in kar1-1/KAR1 heterokaryons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Heterokaryons of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been constructed utilizing the kar1-1 mutation, which prevents nuclear fusion during conjugation (J. Conde and G. Fink, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73:3651-3655, 1976). Each heterokaryon contained two haploid nuclei that were marked on several chromosomes. They segregated haploid progeny (cytoductants), most of which have the nuclear genotype of one or the other of the heterokaryon parents, but they occasionally segregated progeny having a recombinant genotype (exceptional cytoductants). Exceptional cytoductants receive the majority of their genome from one parent (the recipient) and a minority from the other (the donor). Transfer of two markers from the donor nucleus to the recipient is rarely coincident for markers located on different chromosomes but is nearly always coincident for those markers located on the same chromosome, suggesting that whole chromosomes are transferred from the donor nucleus to the recipient. In crosses of kar1-1 X KAR1 parents, either nucleus may act as a recipient or donor with equal probability. Recipient nuclei acquired 9 of the 10 chromosomes examined, with frequencies which were inversely correlated with the size of the chromosome. When a chromosome is acquired by the recipient nucleus, it either replaces its homolog or exists in a disomic condition. Haploid progeny emanating from kar1 X KAR1 crosses are frequently inviable. I tested whether this inviability might be the result of chromosome loss by donor nuclei. Viability of progeny from kar1 X KAR1 heterokaryons was improved when the parental nuclei were diploid to an extent consistent with the hypothesis, and diploid progeny which had become monosomic were recovered from these heterokaryons. The following sequence of events accounts for chromosome transfer in kar1 X KAR1 heterokaryons. After cell fusion, each nucleus in the heterokaryon has a probability of about 0.38 of losing one or more chromosomes. A nucleus sustaining such a loss can become a donor in a chromosome transfer event. If the other nucleus does not sustain a mortal chromosome loss, it can become a recipient in a transfer event. The chance of acquiring a chromosome lost by the donor is greater for smaller chromosomes than for larger ones and is about 0.05 for the average chromosome.     

The positioning of rye homologous chromosomes added to wheat through the cell cycle in somatic cells untreated and treated with colchicine

The arrangement of chromosome pairs 5RL and 7R added to the wild type and the ph1b mutant line of hexaploid wheat are analyzed in 2N somatic root tip cells during the cell cycle relative to the arrangement that chromosomes 5RL show in 4N tapetal cells produced after colchicine treatment. Both homologous chromosome pairs are identified at interphase and mitosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization. In nuclei at interphase, chromosomes appear as discrete domains that show the Rabl orientation. Homologous chromosomes are predominantly non-associated and their positioning seems not to be influenced by the Ph1 gene that suppresses homoeologous meiotic pairing. This pattern of arrangement contrasts with the high level of somatic pairing that sister chromosomes show in the interphase that follows chromosome duplication induced by colchicine. Disruption of pairing observed in some 4N nuclei is produced at c-anaphase which suggests no topological redistribution of homologues during conformation of the new nucleus. Homologous chromosomes show no predominant arrangement in ellipsoidal metaphase plates, which contrasts with the preferential opposite location of homologues in human prometaphase rosettes. Differences between chromosomes in the variation of the length through the cell cycle and in the chromatin morphology when the Ph1 is absent suggest different patterns of chromatin condensation in both chromosomes.     

Well-defined genome architecture in the human sperm nucleus

Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, conventional epifluorescence microscopy, and laser scanning confocal microscopy followed by three-dimensional reconstruction we describe a well-defined higher order packaging of the human genome in the sperm cell nucleus. This was determined by the spatial localization of centromere and telomere regions of all chromosomes and supported by localization of subtelomere sequences of chromosome 3 and the entire chromosome 2. The nuclear architecture in the human sperm is characterized by the clustering of the 23 centromeres into a compact chromocenter positioned well inside the nucleus. The ends of the chromosomes are exposed to the nuclear periphery where both the subtelomere and the telomere sequences of the chromosome arms are joined into dimers. Thus chromosomes in the human sperm nucleus are looped into a hairpin-like configuration. The biological implications of this nuclear architecture in spermatogenesis and male pronuclear formation following fertilization are discussed.     

Changes of Chromosome Length and Constitutive Heterochromatin in Association with Cell Division during Early Development of Cynops pyrrhogaster embryo

The length of chromosomes in the presumptive ectoderms of Cynops embryos was measured at nine successive cell divisions from the 6th (cleavage stage) to the 14th (gastrula stage). Up to the 10th cell division (cleavage stage) the chromosome length remained constant. At the 11th cell division the chromosomes began to shorten and continued to shorten at every cell division up to the 14th cell division. The degree of shortening and the mode of variation in length corresponded to the respective developmental stages of cleavage, blastula and gastrula. During those periods when chromosomes became shortened, some fine C-bands of the paracentromeric region found in earlier stages fused together. The chromatin of interphase nuclei also showed considerable changes during chromosome shortening. Besides the size reduction of interphase nuclei, the number of C-band granules in an interphase nucleus decreased in parallel with chromosome shortening and fusion of C-bands in mitotic chromosome.     

Polytene chromosomes in mouse trophoblast giant cells

Mouse trophoblast giant cells undergo successive rounds of DNA replication resulting in amplification of the genome. It has been difficult to determine whether giant cell chromosomes are polyploid as in liver cells or polytene as in Dipteran salivary glands because the chromosomes do not condense. We have examined the pattern of hybridization of mouse giant cells with a variety of in situ chromosome markers to address this question. Hemizygous markers displayed one hybridization signal per nucleus in both diploid and giant cells, while homozygous markers displayed two signals per nucleus in both cell types. These patterns are consistent with cytological evidence indicating that giant cell chromosomes are polytene rather than polyploid. However, in contrast to the situation in Dipteran salivary glands, the two homologues do not appear to be closely associated. We conclude that the mechanism of giant cell DNA amplification involves multiple rounds of DNA replication in the absence of both karyokinesis and cytokinesis, and that sister chromatids, but not homologous chromosomes, remain closely associated during this process.     

Ordered arrangement and rearrangement of chromosomes during spermatogenesis in two species of planarians (Plathelminthes)

The pattern of distribution of telomeric DNA (TTAGGG), 28S rDNA, and 5S rDNA has been studied using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and primed in situ labelling during spermatogenesis and sperm formation in the filiform spermatozoa of two species of planarians, Dendrocoelum lacteum and Polycelis tenuis (Turbellaria, Plathelminthes). In both species, the positions of FISH signals found with each probe sequence are constant from cell to cell in the nuclei of mature sperm. Chromosome regions containing 5S and 28S rDNA genes are gathered in distinct bundles of spiral form. In early spermatids with roundish nuclei, the sites of a given sequence on different chromosomes remain separate. Centromeres (marked by 5S rDNA) gather into a single cluster in the central region of the slightly elongated sperm nucleus. During spermatid maturation, this cluster migrates to the distal pole of the nucleus. In Polycelis, telomeric sites gather into three distinct clusters at both ends and in the middle of the moderately elongated nucleus. These clusters retain their relative positions as the spermatid matures. All the chromosome ends bearing 28S rDNA gather only into the proximal cluster. Our data suggest that structures in the nucleus selectively recognise chromosome regions containing specific DNA sequences, which helps these regions to find their regular places in the mature sperm nucleus and causes clustering of the sites of these sequences located on different chromosomes. This hypothesis is supported by observations on elongated sperm of other animals in which a correlation exists between ordered arrangement of chromosomes in the mature sperm nucleus and clustering of sites of the same sequence from different chromosomes during spermiogenesis. Received: 15 December 1997; in revised form: 24 March 1998 / Accepted: 14 April 1998     

The spatial organization of the genome in mammalian cells

A number of recent studies have indicated that the location of a given mammalian chromosome within the interphase nucleus is related to its size, whereas other work has implicated a chromosome's gene density as a factor. Recent investigations of the degree to which an ordered arrangement of mitotic chromosomes on the metaphase plate is inherited and perpetuated during successive cell cycles have also yielded somewhat controversial results. The arrangement of chromosomes in the nucleus also has been investigated by the analysis of chromosomal translocations, with some surprising recent findings.