New modification in otoplasty: anterior approach

After harvesting the conchal cartilage in a large series of secondary rhinoplasties using the anterior approach, there was a marked improvement in the shape of the auricle, with unnoticeable scarring hidden under the convolution of the antihelix. In this series of 250 cases, there were no hypertrophic scars or keloid formations. Based on these favorable results, a new modification of otoplasty was developed using only the anterior approach. Between 1992 and 2000, 108 otoplasties were performed on 55 patients to correct the prominent ear using only the anterior approach. All maneuvers used in modern otoplasty, such as conchal reduction, scaphal cartilage scoring and folding, placement of horizontal mattress buried sutures, conchal setback, and the positioning of the tail and upper pole, can be easily and effectively performed using only the anterior approach as described in this article. The use of an anterior approach does not disturb the neurovascular system of the ear because it is located on the ear's posterior side. Overall, patient and physician satisfaction has continued to be very high during the 8 years that this technique has been used. Some patients experienced a few minor complications, such as postoperative pain (16.3 percent), late suture reaction (1.8 percent), hidden helix (3.6 percent), and partial relapse (3.6 percent), that were easily corrected by the application of a Kaye-type buried suture and that were not directly related to the technique.     

Otoplasty: the experience of 100 consecutive patients

Although prominent ears are the most common congenital deformity in the head and neck region, only approximately 8 percent of patients who present for treatment of this deformity will have some family history of the abnormality. More than 200 techniques have been described for correction of this deformity, indicating that there is no single widely accepted procedure that has been adopted by most surgeons. The authors of this study present their choice of a procedure that combines the most beneficial features of three previously described techniques and that provides consistently satisfactory results.The surgical technique consists of scoring of the antihelical cartilage on its anterior surface in a subcutaneous position (as described by Stenstrom), suturing to recreate the fold of the antihelix (in the fashion of Mustarde), and concha-mastoid suturing applied to the back of the ear to decrease the concha-scaphoid angle (in the manner of Furnas). The last 100 consecutive patients operated on by the senior author (J.A.F.) over a 10-year period were evaluated. Follow-up data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival method. The postoperative analysis focused on the incidence of postoperative complications and the overall results of the technique.Most operations were performed bilaterally, on women, and with the patient under local anesthesia. There were few complications, and the incidence of complications was much lower than had been noted in previously reported series. All patients were very satisfied with the improvement in the appearance of their ears.The combined technique presented is safe, easy to perform, and has few complications, and its final outcome is reproducible and long-lasting. It can be considered a standard technique to be used for treating patients of any age and with any magnitude of defect.     

The postauricular fascial flap as an adjunct to Mustardé and Furnas type otoplasty.

Anterior riberation methods of otoplasty have been criticized because of the risk of anterior hematoma that can cause anterior skin necrosis, scarring, and even cartilage destruction caused by infection. As a result, cartilage-sparing otoplasty such as the Mustardé and Furnas types has been increasingly popular. However, postauricular suture extrusion may result, and recurrence rates of up to 25 percent have been recorded. In this study, cartilage-sparing otoplasty is refined by the addition of a postauricular fascial flap to reduce suture extrusion and recurrence rates. Fifty-one patients underwent otoplasty (45 bilateral, six unilateral). This technique involves the elevation of a fascial flap from the postauricular region. A new antihelical fold is then created by Mustardé sutures, and the conchal bowl is rotated by Furnas-type concha-mastoid sutures. The fascial flap is then advanced to cover the sutures with a supplementary vascularized layer to prevent suture extrusion. In addition, the advancement of the flap acts as a postauricular support to prevent recurrence. A natural-looking antihelical fold and helical rim is created by this technique. There were no hematomas. There was recurrence in eight ears (8 percent) in six patients. Two patients requested further surgery. No patients developed suture extrusion or granuloma. This is a simple and intrinsically safe procedure and does not cause irreparable complications such as anterior scarring or skin necrosis. The postauricular fascial flap seems to prevent suture extrusion. It may also help to reduce recurrence rates to acceptable levels.     

Combined otoplasty technique: chondrocutaneous conchal resection as the cornerstone to correction of the prominent ear

The failure to correctly analyze the complex deformity that comprises the prominent ear is the most common cause of the undesired surgical result. Recognizing conchal hypertrophy as one of the leading causes of the prominent ear deformity has led to a versatile and reproducible otoplasty technique that is easily modified to the common side-to-side variation in deformity. From January of 1993 to August of 2000, chondrocutaneous conchal resection has been used as the cornerstone to a combined sequence of maneuvers in otoplasty. The operation was performed on 47 patients (40 bilateral cases and 7 unilateral), and the total number of ears operated on was 87. There were three complications requiring revision surgery, and follow-up periods ranged from 6 months to 7 years, with all patients achieving a satisfactory result. Detailed methods of chondrocutaneous conchal resection along with the sequence of the authors' combined otoplasty techniques are presented.     

Prominent ears in children younger than 4 years of age: what is the appropriate timing for otoplasty?

The present study was conducted to determine whether otoplasty performed in children younger than 4 years of age has an acceptable long-term outcome. This two-part study consisted of (1) a questionnaire mailed to 481 members of the American Association of Plastic Surgeons to ask their opinion on the timing of otoplasty, and (2) a consecutive series of 12 patients who had otoplasty performed before the age of 4 years. The survey demonstrated that the majority (57 percent) of the respondents perform otoplasty on patients who are aged 5 years or older. The prospective series consisted of 12 patients ranging in age from 9 months to 3 years at the time of the procedure. Otoplasty was bilateral in nine patients and unilateral in three patients. Length of follow-up ranged from 21 months to 7(1/2) years, with a median follow-up of 41 months. Growth following otoplasty was evaluated in three patients who underwent unilateral otoplasty by measuring the length of both ears at the time of final follow-up. No difference in ear length was noted between the sides that were and were not operated on during a follow-up period of 46 to 63 months. Noticeable recurrence was noted in only one (8 percent) of 12 patients. In response to a follow-up questionnaire to the patients' families, all respondents (n = 10) stated that if again asked to choose the timing of otoplasty in their children, they would opt to have it performed at the same age of younger than 4 years. Otoplasty can be safely performed at ages younger than previously thought without interfering with growth of the operated ear.     

Otoplasty: sequencing the operation for improved results

LEARNING OBJECTIVES:: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the anatomy and embryology of the external ear. 2. Understand the anatomic causes of the prominent ear. 3. Understand the operative maneuvers used to shape the external ear. 4. Be able to sequence the otoplasty for consistent results. 5. Understand the possible complications of the otoplasty procedure. Correction of prominent ears is a common plastic surgical procedure. Proper execution of the surgical techniques is dependent on the surgeon's understanding of the surgical procedure. This understanding is best founded on an understanding of the historical bases for the operative steps and the execution of these operative steps in a logical fashion. This article describes the concept of sequencing the operation of otoplasty to produce predictable results combining the technical contributions from many authors. The historical, embryological, and anatomic bases for the operation are also discussed. Finally, the authors' preferred techniques are presented. Sequencing the steps in the preoperative assessment, preoperative planning, patient management, operative technique, and postoperative care will produce reproducible results for the attentive surgeon. Careful attention to the details of the operation of otoplasty will avoid many postoperative problems.     

Augmentation rhinoplasty: observations on 1200 cases

Over the past 14 years, from January of 1975 to December of 1988, we have done 1263 aesthetic rhinoplasties using ear cartilage. In the field of augmentation rhinoplasty, many kinds of materials, such as bone, septal cartilage, ear cartilage, and prostheses, were used. In this paper, we limit discussion to our experience with the technique for the augmentation of the nasal dorsum using the ear cartilage and compare this with other materials. Patient ages ranged from 15 to 72 years, with an average of 24 years. Some 95 percent of patients (1199) were female, and only 5 percent (64) were male. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 20 months, with average follow-up only 8 months. Of course, we know that this is a very short follow-up period, but we could not follow patients longer because if they had no complaint about the results at the 6-month visit, they never returned, despite our efforts. Five-hundred and ten of the 1263 patients (40 percent) had been augmented elsewhere, and the silicone prosthesis was already in place. However, 753 patients (60 percent) had no previous operation. For the 510 patients (secondary rhinoplasty patients), too-high or too-large a prosthesis was the largest complaint in number, totaling 378 cases (74 percent), and psychological dissatisfaction, such as pain or an uncomfortable sensation, was the second largest in number, totaling 104 cases (20 percent). For the 753 patients (primary rhinoplasty patients), the main complaint was too-short or too-flat a nose (100 percent).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Indications and use of composite grafts in 100 consecutive secondary and tertiary rhinoplasty patients: introduction of the axial orientation

The fragile alar rims are complex structures whose specialized and supportive skin ensures the competence of the external valves and the patency of the inlets to the nasal airways. A chart review was performed of 100 consecutive secondary or tertiary rhinoplasty patients in whom the author had placed composite grafts before February 1999. Follow-up continued for at least 12 months. In 94 percent of the patients, composite grafts were harvested from the cymba conchae by removing the cartilage with its adherent anterior skin. In 6 percent of the patients, independently indicated alar wedges supplied the grafts. Six patients required secondary procedures to thin the alar rims, but such revisions have not been necessary since primary contouring of the cartilaginous graft component was instituted. Three auricular donor-site complications (one keloid, two thickened graft contours) were successfully revised through office procedures. Prior cosmetic rhinoplasty in a patient with normal alar cartilage anatomy exceeded all other etiologies as the cause of the deformity for which composite grafts were indicated (50 percent). The second most common etiology was deformity from prior rhinoplasty in a patient with alar cartilage malposition (33 percent of patients). Congenital deformities (7 percent of patients), trauma (6 percent), and prior tumor ablation (4 percent) comprised the remaining etiologies. Composite grafts were used most frequently to correct alar notching or asymmetry in rim height (43 percent of patients) or to provide an increase in apparent or real nasal length (28 percent). External valvular incompetence (14 percent of patients), nostril or vestibular stenosis (11 percent), or combined vestibular stenosis and lateral alar wall collapse (4 percent) were less common indications. Most composite grafts were oriented in the coronal plane (parallel to the alar rims). However, nostril or vestibular stenosis was corrected by sagittally placed composite grafts, and a third orientation (axial plane), to the author's knowledge not described previously, was used in patients with combined nostril stenoses and flattening of the alar walls. In this secondary rhinoplasty series, iatrogenic alar rim deformities or stenoses following cosmetic rhinoplasty dominated other causes requiring composite graft reconstruction (83 percent of patients). Of these 83 patients, 39.7 percent had preexisting alar cartilage malpositions, further supporting the importance of making accurate anatomical diagnosis part of every preoperative rhinoplasty plan.     

Resorbable internal splint: an adjunct to primary correction of unilateral cleft lip-nasal deformity

There is usually some relapse in position of the alar cartilage after primary repair of unilateral cleft lip. Therefore, preoperative or postoperative external splinting has been recommended to supplement either closed or open suspension of the alar cartilage. The authors present a method using a resorbable internal nostril splint to shield the positioned alar cartilage from deformational forces caused by scar, and thus avoiding the problems associated with external splinting. An internal nasal splint was placed in 15 infants during repair of unilateral complete cleft lip and nasal deformity. The nasal morphology was compared with that of 15 control patients who had the same nasolabial procedure without internal splinting. Average follow-up time was 20.4 months (range, 4 to 30 months). Photogrammetric analysis showed that asymmetry of the alar contours averaged 8.6 percent in the splinted patients, as compared with 23 percent for controls (p <0.01). Thus, alar asymmetry was decreased two-thirds in the splinted group. An internal resorbable nasal splint is an adjunct to open alar suspension in primary repair of the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity. An internal nasal splint protects the corrected alar cartilage longer than an external splint and eliminates drawbacks, such as necrosis, cutaneous depression of the nostril sill, and patient noncompliance. This strategy of temporary internal support of healing cartilage has other applications.     

Ear deformities, otoplasty, and ear reconstruction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reviewing this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Evaluate patient's ears for needed adjustments to size, shape, prominence, and symmetry. 2. Identify common ear deformities and describe methods to repair them. 3. Avoid or manage common complications associated with otoplasty and ear reconstruction. SUMMARY: The essentials of otoplasty will be described/illustrated for the following conditions: Prominent ears, underdeveloped helical rims (shell ear), macrotia, Stahl's ear, constricted ear, cryptotia, and question mark ear.     

Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction

The main objective of this study was to examine the relationship between specific treatment variables and patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. A questionnaire was developed that included questions on population demographics and satisfaction with the reconstruction. Of 206 women who completed the questionnaire, 23 (11.2 percent) responded that they were not satisfied, whereas 183 (88.8 percent) indicated that they were satisfied overall. A detailed retrospective chart review permitted a comparison of the treatment received by these two groups. Variables analyzed included patient age, time since surgery, reason for surgery, method and timing of reconstruction, additional surgical procedures received (mound revisions and nipple-areola complex reconstruction), and postoperative complications. Data analysis showed that the treatment received by the two groups was similar in many respects. There was no statistical association between the method or timing of reconstruction and a patient's satisfaction with the results. Furthermore, there was no difference in the number of mound revisions or nipple reconstructions performed on satisfied versus dissatisfied patients. However, the latter group experienced a substantially higher incidence of postsurgical complications (27 percent versus 61 percent, p = 0.0015). Patients were also asked to provide a written response explaining their feelings on breast reconstruction. Satisfied patients described benefits from reconstruction such as improved appearance or feelings of normalcy and wholeness. Conversely, unsatisfied patients were displeased because of poor cosmetic results, complications with the reconstructed breast, or abdominal problems. Although overall satisfaction with breast reconstruction is undoubtedly determined by multiple and complex clinical, emotional, and psychological factors, this study suggests that postoperative complications are a particularly important indicator of dissatisfaction with reconstruction.     

Lower auricular malformations: their representation, correction, and embryologic correlation

Seventy-seven lower auricular malformations in 74 patients treated during the last 6 years were analyzed. Sixty cases (77.9 percent) were of malformations involving the earlobe; 54 cases involved the earlobe alone, and 6 cases were of complex deformities involving the earlobe and adjacent helix and/or tragus. Cleft earlobe was the most common lower auricular malformation (49 cases, 63.6 percent); four subtypes and their corrective methods are described. Cases of complex earlobe malformations, corrected by fabricated costal cartilage and expanded skin flap, are presented. A question mark ear (5 cases, 6.5 percent), a malformation with an ectopic anthelical fold (5 cases, 6.5 percent), and a malformation with a lower conchal stria (5 cases, 6.5 percent) are considered to be major lower auricular malformations. An attempt has been made to correlate the presented malformations with the embryologic-fetal development of the auricle. It is suggested that "clefting" ear malformations such as the cleft earlobe, the question mark ear, and the ectopic anthelical fold deformity may provide clues to understanding the embryologic-fetal development of the human auricle. It appears that hillocks 1 and 6 produce the earlobe and that hillock 4 or 5 produces the anthelix or helix.     

Endoscopic brow lift: a retrospective review of 628 consecutive cases over 5 years

Since its introduction in 1992, endoscopic brow lift has gained tremendous recognition because it has been promoted as a novel technique to correct brow ptosis as well as glabella rhytids in a minimally invasive manner with fewer complications than the classic coronal brow lift method. In this retrospective study, 628 endoscopic brow lift procedures performed over a 5-year period (1997-2001) at Manhattan Eye Ear and Throat Hospital were reviewed. The number of endoscopic brow lift procedures performed at this institution has declined 70 percent. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the causes of this striking trend by soliciting the opinions of 21 New York plastic surgeons on their current brow ptosis management. The response rate was 84 percent (21 of 25 surgeons contacted). Currently, 25 percent of the interviewed plastic surgeons perform endoscopic brow lift regularly, 50 percent of the plastic surgeons perform endoscopic brow lift occasionally, and 25 percent of the participants no longer perform endoscopic brow lift. While most patients (70 percent) were satisfied with their results, only 50 percent of the plastic surgeons were pleased with the long-term results (after more than 2 years of follow-up). Observed postsurgical complications of endoscopic brow lift included alopecia, hairline changes, infected hardware, brow asymmetry requiring surgical revision, prolonged forehead/brow paresthesia, frontal branch nerve paralysis, and scalp dysesthesia. These complications were similar to those resulting from open brow lifts. Seventy-one percent of the surveyed New York plastic surgeons routinely administered botulinum toxin type A (Botox) within 6 months of the endoscopic brow lift procedure. Possible explanations for the decline in the overall number of endoscopic brow lift procedures include the following: (1) the selection criteria for the ideal endoscopic brow lift patients are currently more limited; (2) other techniques equal or surpass endoscopic brow lift in effectiveness and predictability; and (3) endoscopic brow lift is ineffective in the majority of patients. There is no single superior surgical procedure for brow ptosis management available at this time.     

Treatment of lesions of the rotator cuff

The impingement syndrome and tendinopathy of the rotator cuff are the most common causes (complaints) of pain and disability of the shoulder. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a specific rehabilitative protocol, integrated with the administration of a nutritional supplement, in the conservative rehabilitative treatment, as well as in post-surgery, of patients with lesions of the rotator cuff. Two groups with syndrome of the rotator cuff were formed to follow different therapeutic courses, in relation to the choice of each subject to undergo the conservative treatment (Arm A) or the surgical one (Arm B). In Arm A the study included the association of therapy with ESWT (shock waves) with the proprioceptive Multi Joint System, for rehabilitating joint movement and muscle strength of the shoulder, and a specific nutritional supplement to reduce the pain and conserve the cartilage tissue. Between February 2009 and June 2009, we enrolled 30 subjects (randomized into three homogenous groups A1, A2, A3), average age 45±10 years, with rotator cuff syndrome with calcification of the shoulder, diagnosed through clinical examination and investigative instruments (X-ray, echography or NMR). In Arm B, from September 2009 to January 2010, we enrolled 50 patients (randomized into two groups, B1 and B2), 24 male (average age 58.4: min 28 and max 78) and 26 females (average age 59.5: min 30 and max 80), who had undergone rotator cuff operations and acromionplasty for non-massive lesions without important gleno-humeral instability, with either open or arthroscopic procedures. The analysis of the results of Arm A highlights that in terms of reducing pain the main benefits were found in Group A1 where the supplement was given. From the analysis of the data of Arm B, in both groups an improvement of the first 4 items evaluated was evident. In Group B1, 84 percent of the patients declared to be satisfied and improved and 16 percent were dissatisfied; in Group B2, where the nutritional supplement was given, 92 percent were satisfied and 8 percent were dissatisfied. In conclusion, we retain that in cases of rotator cuff syndrome, an integrated rehabilitative approach, whether conservative or post-surgical, directed at taking total control of the patient, must observe particular attention to the optimization of the articular tissular metabolic balance in order to favour better functional recovery.     

An improved one-stage total ear reconstruction procedure

Based on anatomic studies of the postauricular cutaneous circulation, a modified single-stage total ear reconstruction procedure has been presented. The operation consists of using a large, superthin, well-vascularized, and well-innervated skin flap to cover the anterior surface of the auricular framework carved from costal cartilage, the posterior surface of which is covered by a subcutaneous tissue flap and then skin grafted. Improvements in the makeup and carving of the framework have been made and described. This method has been used to treat 15 cases of anotia, all with satisfactory results.     

Auricular repair with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: two decades of experience with 600 cases.

The purpose of this paper is twofold: to present a sound approach to auricular construction using methods that have evolved through two decades of my personal experience with 600 cases and to discuss pertinent information I have gleaned from a questionnaire sent to my operated patients. This series comprises 546 completed ears in 500 microtia patients (46 bilateral) and 75 completed ears in acquired deformities. Follow-up ranges from 1 to 17 years. Major complications such as infection, hematoma, or skin loss with cartilage exposure occurred in only 1.6 percent of cases and were limited to the perioperative period of 12 days. None have occurred in the last 9 years (481 frameworks). This paper describes the evolution and rationale for my current management of total ear repair and covers preoperative planning, how to fabricate the rib cartilage framework, how to modify the framework for specific deformities, and how to cover the framework, i.e., how to assess and use local skin and vestiges or when to supplement the coverage by recruiting fascial flaps or using tissue expansion. When considering fascial flaps, patient selection was found to be particularly important because of long-term effects on the donor scalp; expansion was found to be most useful intraoperatively. This paper also covers how to manage the hairline, how to stage the surgery, when to combine procedures, and how to manage bilateral microtia in a team approach. The survey revealed that autogenous cartilage frameworks grow, are durable, retain their detail over the years, and withstand trauma well. More than 40 severe traumas occurred in surgically constructed ears, and all healed without incident. Ears constructed in young patients generally grew to keep pace with the opposite normal side; 41.6 percent actually overgrew by several millimeters. Emotional and psychological benefits were universal, and patient satisfaction was high. Among patients who were classified as "severely affected" by the original deformity, 100 percent were pleased with the result. When considered "moderately disturbed" by the microtic defect and operated on by age 14, 95.5 percent of patients were satisfied with the surgical repair; 83.3 percent of adolescents between the ages of 15 and 20 who did not consider themselves "severely affected" by the deformity were pleased with the outcome, and the rest were "undecided."     

The crumpled-ear deformity.

The common characteristics of the crumpled-ear deformity, the steps for surgical correction, and the authors' experience are described in this article. Commonly, the ear has a folded-over appearance; a normal length and width when unfurled; and wrinkling of the skin and cartilage of the helical rim, scapha, antihelix, and concha. Principles of correction of this deformity include (1) superficial scoring of the concave segments of the cartilage to open the wrinkled segments, (2) creating the antihelical fold by a mattress-suture technique, (3) repositioning of the helical rim, and (4) repositioning of the prominent ear lobe, if present. A total of 12 crumpled ears were evaluated in six patients, three of whom underwent surgery during their teenage years. No complications have been observed. A new classification of an ear deformity has been proposed based on morphology that to the authors' knowledge has not been described in the literature. Identification of the common features of the deformity allows for precise correction using already well-defined techniques.     

Lipoaspiration and its complications: a safe operation

Although lipoaspiration has been considered a safe surgical procedure for the last 30 years, reports indicate that this procedure has a high index of complications. This study was performed to analyze experience with patients in a clinical practice for the past 8 years who underwent lipoaspiration, either alone or in combination with another surgical procedure, and to compare the results with previous reports in the literature. The patients were divided into four groups: lipoaspiration alone of less than 5 liters, lipoaspiration alone of more than 5 liters, lipoaspiration combined with abdominoplasty, and lipoaspiration combined with another surgical procedure. Complications were divided into minor or major, depending on previous reports, and statistical analysis was used to determine any significant difference among the four groups. From January of 1994 to December of 2001, 1047 patients underwent lipoaspiration, either alone or in combination with another surgical procedure. A 21.7 percent incidence of minor complications was noted, as well as a 0.38 percent incidence of major complications. Minor complications included palpable and visible irregularities, seromas, cutaneous hyperpigmentation, overcorrection, cutaneous slough, and local infection. Major complications included fat embolism syndrome, cutaneous necrosis, and extended infection. No statistical difference was noted among the groups studied. The incidence of complications was similar to that in clinical reports in the world literature, being of a low percentage rate when compared with the reports of other types of surgical procedures. On the basis of these results, lipoaspiration continues to be a safe surgical procedure, but to maximally avoid complications, one should be mindful of all the factors that could predispose to them.     

The nasal tip: cartilage repositioning

Two hundred and forty patients who underwent a corrective rhinoplasty have been presented. Of these, 224 patients (93.3 percent) had a cartilage repositioning procedure in which the alar cartilages were only undermined and repositioned, and 16 patients (6.7 percent) had a cartilage resection procedure. The techniques and indications for both procedures are described and discussed. The results obtained in this series of patients indicate that cartilage repositioning is an effective and reliable procedure to refine and reshape the nasal tip. Cartilage resection is less reliable and should be reserved for a few selected patients with specific indications. Indiscriminate resection of the lower alar cartilage is neither warranted nor wise.     

Understanding the unfavorable result after otoplasty: an integrated approach to correction

The correction of an unfavorable outcome after otoplasty requires a thorough understanding of the anatomy of prominent ear and recognition of the spectrum of secondary deformities and their origin. The goal of this article is to describe the causes of postotoplasty deformity, including both undercorrection and overcorrection. The latter presents the more complicated reconstructive problem, as both skin shortage and permanent cartilage disruption need to be addressed. The authors propose an algorithm for revision otoplasty based on clinical findings and patient concerns. Finally, a case with overcorrection secondary to both skin deficiency and cartilage disruption is illustrated showing the sequential steps needed for optimal correction.