Purification and properties of theDrosophila zen protein

Summary The zen protein is encoded by the zerknullt gene required for normal early development inDrosophila. Like many regulatory proteins of this type, zen contains a 60 amino acid homeobox sequence. We have purified the zen protein and studied its solution behavior and its interaction with DNA. The zen protein exists as a monomer in solution with a molecular weight of about 40000. It binds specifically to a site about 900 bases upstream from thezen gene. Within this binding site DNase protection experiments indicate that binding is confined to two regions approximately 11 and 14 bases in length that are separated by about 30 base pairs. The protein concentration dependence of the binding curve suggests that protein binding is non cooperative.     

Adaptive evolution at the molecular level of the duplicatedAmy gene system inDrosophila

Analyses of the nucleotide sequences of the duplicatedAmy genes in the eight species of theDrosophila melanogaster species subgroup have revealed concerted evolution of the coding regions and divergent evolution between the duplicated genes of the 5’-flanking regions. Homogenization between the duplicated genes in the coding region is maintained by frequent genetic exchange in various portions of the coding region. On the other hand, such genetic exchange seems to produce a large amount of DNA sequence variation and protein polymorphism at the two loci within a species. The puzzling observation that concerted evolution is restricted to the coding regions seems to be explained by not only adaptive evolution of the AMY proteins in speciation but also adaptive fixation of selectively advantageous mutations in the intergenic region that differentiate expression of the twoAmy genes. We review molecular work on theAmy gene system inDrosophila, including evidence from biochemical characterization of the AMY proteins and molecular characterization of the cis regulatory elements.     

MEF10 is required for RNA editing at nad2-842 in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana and interacts with MORF8

A forwards genetic screen of a chemically mutated plant population identified mitochondrial RNA editing factor 10 (MEF10) in Arabidopsis thaliana. MEF10 is a trans-factor required specifically for the C to U editing of site nad2-842. The MEF10 protein is characterized by a stretch of pentatricopeptide repeats (PPR) and a C-terminal extension domain ending with the amino acids DYW. Editing is lost in mutant plants but is recovered by transgenic introduction of an intact MEF10 gene. The MEF10 protein interacts with multiple organellar RNA editing factor 8 (MORF8) but not with other mitochondrial MORF proteins in yeast two hybrid assays. These results support the model that specific combinations of MORF and MEF proteins are involved in RNA editing in plant mitochondria.     

Yeast Srp1, a nuclear protein related toDrosophila and mouse pendulin,is required for normal migration,division, and integrity of nuclei during mitosis

This paper describes genes from yeast and mouse with significant sequence similarities to aDrosophila gene that encodes the blood cell tumor suppressor pendulin. The protein encoded by the yeast gene, Srp1p, and mouse pendulin share 42% and 51% amino acid identity withDrosophila pendulin, respectively. All three proteins consist of 10.5 degenerate tandem repeats of ～ 42 amino acids each. Similar repeats occur in a superfamily of proteins that includes theDrosophila Armadillo protein. All three proteins contain a consensus sequence for a bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) in the N-terminal domain, which is not part of the repeat structure. Confocal microscopic analysis of yeast cells stained with antibodies against Srp1p reveals that this protein is intranuclear throughout the cell cycle. Targeted gene disruption shows thatSRP1 is an essential gene. Despite their sequence similarities,Drosophila and mouse pendulin are unable to rescue the lethality of anSRP1 disruption. We demonstrate that yeast cells depleted of Srp1p arrest in mitosis with a G2 content of DNA. Arrested cells display abnormal structures and orientations of the mitotic spindles, aberrant segregation of the chromatin and the nuclei, and threads of chromatin emanating from the bulk of nuclear DNA. This phenotype suggests that Srplp is required for the normal function of microtubules and the spindle pole bodies, as well as for nuclear integrity. We suggest that Srp1p interacts with multiple components of the cell nucleus that are required for mitosis and discuss its functional similarities to, and differences fromDrosophila pendulin.     

Nucleotide sequence from the genetic left end of bacteriophage T7 DNA to the beginning of gene 4

The nucleotide sequence running from the genetic left end of bacteriophage T7 DNA to within the coding sequence of gene 4 is given, except for the internal coding sequence for the gene 1 protein, which has been determined elsewhere. The sequence presented contains nucleotides 1 to 3342 and 5654 to 12,100 of the approximately 40,000 base-pairs of T7 DNA. This sequence includes: the three strong early promoters and the termination site for Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: eight promoter sites for T7 RNA polymerase; six RNAase III cleavage sites; the primary origin of replication of T7 DNA; the complete coding sequences for 13 previously known T7 proteins, including the anti-restriction protein, protein kinase, DNA ligase, the gene 2 inhibitor of E. coli RNA polymerase, single-strand DNA binding protein, the gene 3 endonuclease, and lysozyme (which is actually an N-acetylmuramyl-l-alanine amidase); the complete coding sequences for eight potential new T7-coded proteins; and two apparently independent initiation sites that produce overlapping polypeptide chains of gene 4 primase. More than 86% of the first 12,100 base-pairs of T7 DNA appear to be devoted to specifying amino acid sequences for T7 proteins, and the arrangement of coding sequences and other genetic elements is very efficient. There is little overlap between coding sequences for different proteins, but junctions between adjacent coding sequences are typically close, the termination codon for one protein often overlapping the initiation codon for the next. For almost half of the potential T7 proteins, the sequence in the messenger RNA that can interact with 16 S ribosomal RNA in initiation of protein synthesis is part of the coding sequence for the preceding protein. The longest non-coding region, about 900 base-pairs, is at the left end of the DNA. The right half of this region contains the strong early promoters for E. coli RNA polymerase and the first RNAase III cleavage site. The left end contains the terminal repetition (nucleotides 1 to 160), followed by a striking array of repeated sequences (nucleotides 175 to 340) that might have some role in packaging the DNA into phage particles, and an A · T-rich region (nucleotides 356 to 492) that contains a promoter for T7 RNA polymerase, and which might function as a replication origin.     

Diversity and evolution of mitochondrial RNA editing systems

'RNA editing' describes the programmed alteration of the nucleotide sequence of an RNA species, relative to the sequence of the encoding DNA. The phenomenon encompasses two generic patterns of nucleotide change, 'insertion/deletion' and 'substitution', defined on the basis of whether the sequence of the edited RNA is colinear with the DNA sequence that encodes it. RNA editing is mediated by a variety of pathways that are mechanistically and evolutionarily unrelated. Messenger, ribosomal, transfer and viral RNAs all undergo editing in different systems, but well-documented cases of this phenomenon have so far been described only in eukaryotes, and most often in mitochondria. Editing of mRNA changes the identity of encoded amino acids and may create translation initiation and termination codons. The existence of RNA editing violates one of the long-accepted tenets of genetic information flow, namely, that the amino acid sequence of a protein can be directly predicted from the corresponding gene sequence. Particular RNA editing systems display a narrow phylogenetic distribution, which argues that such systems are derived within specific eukaryotic lineages, rather than representing traits that ultimately trace to a common ancestor of eukaryotes, or even further back in evolution. The derived nature of RNA editing raises intriguing questions about how and why RNA editing systems arise, and how they become fixed as additional, essential steps in genetic information transfer.     

RNA editing of 10 Didymium iridis mitochondrial genes and comparison with the homologous genes in Physarum polycephalum

Regions of the Didymium iridis mitochondrial genome were identified with similarity to typical mitochondrial genes; however, these regions contained numerous stop codons. We used RT-PCR and DNA sequencing to determine whether, through RNA editing, these regions were transcribed into mRNAs that could encode functional proteins. Ten putative gene regions were examined: atp1, atp6, atp8, atp9, cox1, cox2, cytb, nad4L, nad6, and nad7. The cDNA sequences of each gene could encode a functional mitochondrial protein that was highly conserved compared with homologous genes. The type of editing events and editing sequence features were very similar to those observed in the homologous genes of Physarum polycephalum, though the actual editing locations showed a variable degree of conservation. Edited sites were compared with encoded sites in D. iridis and P. polycephalum for all 10 genes. Edited sequence for a portion of the cox1 gene was available for six myxomycetes, which, when compared, showed a high degree of conservation at the protein level. Different types of editing events showed varying degrees of site conservation with C-to-U base changes being the least conserved. Several aspects of single C insertion editing events led to the preferential creation of hydrophobic amino acid codons that may help to minimize adverse effects on the resulting protein structure.     

The complete nucleotide sequence and RNA editing content of the mitochondrial genome of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): comparative analysis of the mitochondrial genomes of rapeseed and Arabidopsis thaliana

The entire mitochondrial genome of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) was sequenced and compared with that of Arabidopsis thaliana. The 221 853 bp genome contains 34 protein-coding genes, three rRNA genes and 17 tRNA genes. This gene content is almost identical to that of Arabidopsis. However the rps14 gene, which is a pseudo-gene in Arabidopsis, is intact in rapeseed. On the other hand, five tRNA genes are missing in rapeseed compared to Arabidopsis, although the set of mitochondrially encoded tRNA species is identical in the two Cruciferae. RNA editing events were systematically investigated on the basis of the sequence of the rapeseed mitochondrial genome. A total of 427 C to U conversions were identified in ORFs, which is nearly identical to the number in Arabidopsis (441 sites). The gene sequences and intron structures are mostly conserved (more than 99% similarity for protein-coding regions); however, only 358 editing sites (83% of total editings) are shared by rapeseed and Arabidopsis. Non-coding regions are mostly divergent between the two plants. One-third (about 78.7 kb) and two-thirds (about 223.8 kb) of the rapeseed and Arabidopsis mitochondrial genomes, respectively, cannot be aligned with each other and most of these regions do not show any homology to sequences registered in the DNA databases. The results of the comparative analysis between the rapeseed and Arabidopsis mitochondrial genomes suggest that higher plant mitochondria are extremely conservative with respect to coding sequences and somewhat conservative with respect to RNA editing, but that non-coding parts of plant mitochondrial DNA are extraordinarily dynamic with respect to structural changes, sequence acquisition and/or sequence loss.     

RNAi Interference by dsRNA Injection into Drosophila Embryos

Genetic screening is one of the most powerful methods available for gaining insights into complex biological process ¹. Over the years many improvements and tools for genetic manipulation have become available in Drosophila². Soon after the initial discovery by Frie and Mello ³ that double stranded RNA can be used to knockdown the activity of individual genes in Caenorhabditis elegans, RNA interference (RNAi) was shown to provide a powerful reverse genetic approach to analyze gene functions in Drosophila organ development ^{4, 5}.Many organs, including lung, kidney, liver, and vascular system, are composed of branched tubular networks that transport vital fluids or gases ^{6, 7}. The analysis of Drosophila tracheal formation provides an excellent model system to study the morphogenesis of other tubular organs ⁸. The Berkeley Drosophila genome project has revealed hundreds of genes that are expressed in the tracheal system. To study the molecular and cellular mechanism of tube formation, the challenge is to understand the roles of these genes in tracheal development. Here, we described a detailed method of dsRNA injection into Drosophila embryo to knockdown individual gene expression. We successfully knocked down endogenous dysfusion(dys) gene expression by dsRNA injection. Dys is a bHLH-PAS protein expressed in tracheal fusion cells, and it is required for tracheal branch fusion ^{9, 10}. dys-RNAi completely eliminated dys expression and resulted in tracheal fusion defect. This relatively simple method provides a tool to identify genes requried for tissure and organ development in Drosophila.Download video file.^{(52M, mov)}