Cutting edge: CD8+ effector T cells reject tumors by direct antigen recognition but indirect action on host cells

CD8(+) effector T cells recognize malignant cells by monitoring their surface for the presence of tumor-derived peptides bound to MHC class I molecules. In addition, tumor-derived Ags can be cross-presented to CD8(+) effector T cells by APCs. IFN-gamma production by CD8(+) T cells is often critical for tumor rejection. However, it remained unclear whether 1) CD8(+) T cells secrete IFN-gamma in response to Ag recognition on tumor cells or APCs and 2) whether IFN-gamma mediates its antitumor effect by acting on host or tumor cells. We show in this study that CD8(+) effector T cells can reject tumors in bone marrow-chimeric mice incapable of cross-presenting Ag by bone marrow-derived APCs and that tumor rejection required host cells to express IFN-gammaR. Together, CD8(+) effector T cells recognize Ag directly on tumor cells, and this recognition is sufficient to reject tumors by IFN-gamma acting on host cells.     

Hematopoietic cells are required to initiate a Chlamydia trachomatis-specific CD8+ T cell response

Chlamydia trachomatis is a global human pathogen causing diseases ranging from blinding trachoma to pelvic inflammatory disease. To explore how innate and adaptive immune responses cooperate to protect against systemic infection with C. trachomatis L2, we investigated the role of macrophages (Mphi) and dendritic cells (DCs) in the stimulation of C. trachomatis-specific CD8(+) T cells. We found that C. trachomatis infection of Mphi and DCs is far less productive than infection of nonprofessional APCs, the typical targets of infection. However, despite the limited replication of C. trachomatis within Mphi and DCs, infected Mphi and DCs process and present C. trachomatis CD8(+) T cell Ag in a proteasome-dependent manner. These findings suggest that although C. trachomatis is a vacuolar pathogen, some Ags expressed in infected Mphi and DCs are processed in the host cell cytosol for presentation to CD8(+) T cells. We also show that even though C. trachomatis replicates efficiently within nonprofessional APCs both in vitro and in vivo, Ag presentation by hematopoietic cells is essential for initial stimulation of C. trachomatis-specific CD8(+) T cells. However, when DCs infected with C. trachomatis ex vivo were adoptively transferred into naive mice, they failed to prime C. trachomatis-specific CD8(+) T cells. We propose a model for priming C. trachomatis-specific CD8(+) T cells whereby DCs acquire C. trachomatis Ag by engulfing productively infected nonprofessional APCs and then present the Ag to T cells via a mechanism of cross-presentation.     

The male minor transplantation antigen preferentially activates recipient CD4+ T cells through the indirect presentation pathway in vivo

To evaluate the priming and trafficking of male Ag-reactive CD4(+) T cells in vivo, we developed an adoptive transfer model, using Marilyn (Mar) TCR transgenic T cells that are specific for the H-Y minor transplantation Ag plus I-A(b). By manipulating donor and recipient strain combinations, we permitted the Mar CD4(+) T cells to respond to the H-Y Ag after processing and presentation by recipient APCs (indirect pathway), or to the male Ag as expressed on donor APCs (direct pathway). Mar CD4(+) T cells responding through the indirect pathway specifically proliferated and expressed activation markers between days 2 and 4 posttransplant, migrated to the graft 2-3 days before cessation of graft heartbeat, and were detected in close proximity to transplant-infiltrating recipient APCs. Intriguingly, adoptively transferred Mar T cells did not respond to male heart or skin grafts placed onto syngeneic MHC class II-deficient female recipients, demonstrating that activation of Mar T cell preferentially occurs through cognate interactions with processed male Ag expressed on recipient APCs. The data highlight the potency of indirect processing and presentation pathways in vivo and underscore the importance of indirectly primed CD4(+) T cells as relevant participants in both the priming and effector phases of acute graft rejection.     

Cross-presentation of HLA class I epitopes from exogenous NY-ESO-1 polypeptides by nonprofessional APCs

NY-ESO-1, a germ cell Ag often detected in tumor tissues, frequently elicits Ab and CD8(+) T cell responses in cancer patients. Overlapping long peptides spanning the NY-ESO-1 sequence have been used to map HLA class I-restricted epitopes recognized by NY-ESO-1-specific CD8(+) T lymphocytes. To address the antigenicity of long peptides, we analyzed two synthetic 30-mer peptides from NY-ESO-1, polypeptides 80-109 and 145-174, for their capacity to be processed by APCs and to stimulate CD8(+) T cells. By incubating APCs with polypeptides at different temperatures or in the presence of protease inhibitors, we found that NY-ESO-1 polypeptides were rapidly internalized by B cells, T2 cells, or PBLs and submitted to cellular proteolytic action to yield nonamer epitopes presented by HLA class I. Polypeptides were also immunogenic in vitro and stimulated the expansion of CD8(+) T cells against naturally processed NY-ESO-1 epitopes in the context of three different HLA class I alleles. Polypeptides can thus serve as exogenous Ags that are cross-presented on HLA class I without requiring the action of professional APCs. These findings support innovative vaccination strategies using NY-ESO-1 polypeptides that would circumvent current limitations of HLA class I peptide vaccination, i.e., HLA eligibility criteria and knowledge of epitope, while allowing for facilitated immunogenicity in the presence of helper epitopes.     

Rejection of mouse cardiac allografts by costimulation in trans

The activation of T cells by B7 costimulation in trans has been demonstrated in vitro, but the in vivo relevance is unknown. To study costimulation in trans of CD4(+) T cells in vivo, we performed cardiac transplants from B7-1/B7-2-deficient mice to recipients that do not express MHC class II molecules on peripheral APCs, but do have functional CD4(+) T cells (II(-)/4(+) mice). This model restricts the B7-dependent activation of CD4(+) T cells to costimulation in trans and excludes any contribution from indirect Ag presentation. We find that II(-)/4(+) recipients reject B7-deficient grafts as rapidly as wild-type grafts, suggesting that costimulation in trans can mediate rejection as potently as costimulation in cis. Treatment of II(-)/4(+) recipients of B7-deficient grafts with depleting Abs to CD4 or CD8 demonstrates that indirect Ag presentation to CD8(+) cells does not significantly contribute to rejection. This is the first demonstration that costimulation in trans can mediate an immune response in vivo and has important therapeutic implications.     

Influenza A infection enhances cross-priming of CD8+ T cells to cell-associated antigens in a TLR7- and type I IFN-dependent fashion

The initiation of antitumor immunity relies on dendritic cells (DCs) to cross-present cell-associated tumor Ag to CD8(+) T cells (T(CD8+)) due to a lack of costimulatory molecules on tumor cells. Innate danger signals have been demonstrated to enhance cross-priming of T(CD8+) to soluble as well as virally encoded Ags; however, their effect on enhancing T(CD8+) cross-priming to cell genome-encoded Ags remains unknown. Furthermore, influenza A virus (IAV) has not been shown to enhance antitumor immunity. Using influenza-infected allogeneic cell lines, we show in this study that T(CD8+) responses to cell-associated Ags can be dramatically enhanced due to enhanced T(CD8+) expansion. This enhanced cross-priming in part involves TLR7- but not TLR3-mediated sensing of IAV and is entirely dependent on MyD88 and IFN signaling pathways. We also showed that the inflammasome-induced IL-1 and IFN-γ did not play a role in enhancing cross-priming in our system. We further demonstrated in our ex vivo system that CD8(+) DCs are the only APCs able to prime TCR-transgenic T(CD8+). Importantly, plasmacytoid DCs and CD8(-) DCs were both able to enhance such priming when provided in coculture. These observations suggest that IAV infection of tumor cells may facilitate improved cross-presentation of tumor Ags and may be used to augment clinical vaccine efficacy.     

Human tumor-derived heat shock protein 96 mediates in vitro activation and in vivo expansion of melanoma- and colon carcinoma-specific T cells

Heat shock proteins (hsp) 96 play an essential role in protein metabolism and exert stimulatory activities on innate and adaptive immunity. Vaccination with tumor-derived hsp96 induces CD8(+) T cell-mediated tumor regressions in different animal models. In this study, we show that hsp96 purified from human melanoma or colon carcinoma activate tumor- and Ag-specific T cells in vitro and expand them in vivo. HLA-A*0201-restricted CD8(+) T cells recognizing Ags expressed in human melanoma (melanoma Ag recognized by T cell-1 (MART-1)/melanoma Ag A (Melan-A)) or colon carcinoma (carcinoembryonic Ag (CEA)/epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)) were triggered to release IFN-gamma and to mediate cytotoxic activity by HLA-A*0201-matched APCs pulsed with hsp96 purified from tumor cells expressing the relevant Ag. Such activation occurred in class I HLA-restricted fashion and appeared to be significantly higher than that achieved by direct peptide loading. Immunization with autologous tumor-derived hsp96 induced a significant increase in the recognition of MART-1/Melan-A(27-35) in three of five HLA-A*0201 melanoma patients, and of CEA(571-579) and EpCAM(263-271) in two of five HLA-A*0201 colon carcinoma patients, respectively, as detected by ELISPOT and HLA/tetramer staining. These increments in Ag-specific T cell responses were associated with a favorable disease course after hsp96 vaccination. Altogether, these data provide evidence that hsp96 derived from human tumors can present antigenic peptides to CD8(+) T cells and activate them both in vitro and in vivo, thus representing an important tool for vaccination in cancer patients.     

In vivo ligation of CD40 enhances priming against the endogenous tumor antigen and promotes CD8+ T cell effector function in SV40 T antigen transgenic mice

The ability to initiate and sustain CD8(+) T cell responses to tumors in vivo is hindered by the development of peripheral T cell tolerance against tumor-associated Ags. Approaches that counter the onset of T cell tolerance may preserve a pool of potentially tumor-reactive CD8(+) T cells. Administration of agonist Ab to the CD40 molecule, expressed on APCs, can enhance immunization approaches targeting T lymphocytes in an otherwise tolerance-prone environment. In this report, the effects of anti-CD40 administration on priming of naive CD8(+) T cells against an endogenous tumor Ag were investigated. Line 501 mice express the SV40 large T Ag oncoprotein as a transgene from the alpha-amylase promoter, resulting in the development of peripheral CD8(+) T cell tolerance to the H-2-D(b)-restricted immunodominant epitope I of T Ag by 6 mo of age, before the appearance of osteosarcomas. We demonstrate that naive epitope I-specific TCR transgenic (TCR-I) T cells undergo peripheral tolerance following adoptive transfer into 6-mo-old 501 mice. In contrast, administration of agonistic anti-CD40 Ab led to increased expansion of TCR-I T cells in 501 mice, the acquisition of effector function by TCR-I T cells and the establishment of T cell memory. Importantly, this enhanced priming effect of anti-CD40 administration did not require immunization and was effective even if administered after naive TCR-I T cells had encountered the endogenous T Ag. Thus, anti-CD40 administration can block the onset of peripheral tolerance and enhance the recruitment of functionally competent effector T cells toward an endogenous tumor Ag.     

Cross-priming as a predominant mechanism for inducing CD8(+) T cell responses in gene gun DNA immunization.

DNA immunization induces CD8(+) CTL responses by bone marrow-derived APCs, which are directly transfected with a plasmid DNA and/or acquire Ags from DNA-transfected non-APCs. To investigate the relative contribution of DNA-transfected APCs vs non-APCs to the initiation of CD8(+) T cell responses, we used tissue-specific promoter-directed gene expression and adoptive transfer systems in gene gun DNA immunization. In this study, we demonstrated that non-APC-specific gene expressions induced significant CD8(+) CTL and IFN-gamma-producing cells and Ab responses, whereas APC-specific gene expressions led to moderate CTL and IFN-gamma-producers, but no Ab responses. Interestingly, mice immunized with a non-APC-specific plasmid induced more rapid, vigorous, and prolonged proliferation of adoptively transferred Ag-specific CD8(+) T cells than APC-specific plasmid-immunized mice. In addition, the in vivo proliferative responses elicited by a non-APC-specific plasmid administration were dependent on TAP, but were independent of CD4(+) T cell help. Collectively, our results suggest that cross-priming, in which Ags expressed in non-APCs are taken up, processed, and presented by APCs, plays an important role in the initiation, magnitude, and maintenance of CD8(+) T cell responses in gene gun DNA immunization.     

Listeria monocytogenes infection overcomes the requirement for CD40 ligand in exogenous antigen presentation to CD8(+) T cells.

In vivo priming of CD8(+) T lymphocytes against exogenously processed model Ags requires CD4(+) T cell help, specifically interactions between CD40 ligand (CD40L) expressed by activated CD4(+) T cells and CD40, which is present on professional APC such as dendritic cells (DCs). To address this issue in the context of bacterial infection, we examined CD40L-CD40 interactions in CD8(+) T cell priming against an exogenously processed, nonsecreted bacterial Ag. CD40L interactions were blocked by in vivo treatment with anti-CD40L mAb MR-1, which inhibited germinal center formation and CD8(+) T cell cross-priming against an exogenous model Ag, OVA. In contrast, MR-1 treatment did not interfere with CD8(+) T cell priming against a nonsecreted or secreted recombinant Ag expressed by Listeria monocytogenes. Memory and secondary responses of CD8(+) T cells against nonsecreted and secreted bacterial Ags were also largely unimpaired by transient MR-1 treatment. When MR-1-treated mice were concurrently immunized with L. monocytogenes and OVA-loaded splenocytes, cross-priming of OVA-specific naive CD8(+) T cells occurred. No significant decline in cross-priming against OVA was measured when either TNF or IFN-gamma was neutralized in L. monocytogenes-infected animals, demonstrating that multiple signals exist to overcome CD40L blockade of CD8(+) T cell cross-priming during bacterial infection. These data support a model in which DCs can be stimulated in vivo through signals other than CD40, becoming APC that can effectively stimulate CD8(+) T cell responses against exogenous Ags during infection.     

Airway eosinophils: allergic inflammation recruited professional antigen-presenting cells

The capacity of airway eosinophils, potentially pertinent to allergic diseases of the upper and lower airways, to function as professional APCs, those specifically able to elicit responses from unprimed, Ag-naive CD4(+) T cells has been uncertain. We investigated whether airway eosinophils are capable of initiating naive T cell responses in vivo. Eosinophils, isolated free of other APCs from the spleens of IL-5 transgenic mice, following culture with GM-CSF expressed MHC class II and the costimulatory proteins, CD40, CD80, and CD86. Eosinophils, incubated with OVA Ag in vitro, were instilled intratracheally into wild-type recipient mice that adoptively received i.v. infusions of OVA Ag-specific CD4(+) T cells from OVA TCR transgenic mice. OVA-exposed eosinophils elicited activation (CD69 expression), proliferation (BrdU incorporation), and IL-4, but not IFN-gamma, cytokine production by OVA-specific CD4(+) T cells in paratracheal lymph nodes (LN). Exposure of eosinophils to lysosomotropic NH(4)Cl, which inhibits Ag processing, blocked each of these eosinophil-mediated activation responses of CD4(+) T cells. By three-color fluorescence microscopy, OVA Ag-loaded eosinophil APCs were physically interacting with naive OVA-specific CD4(+) T cells in paratracheal LN after eosinophil airway instillation. Thus, recruited luminal airway eosinophils are distinct allergic "inflammatory" professional APCs able to activate primary CD4(+) T cell responses in regional LNs.     

NKT cells inhibit antigen-specific effector CD8 T cell induction to skin viral proteins

We recently demonstrated that CD1d-restricted NKT cells resident in skin can inhibit CD8 T cell-mediated graft rejection of human papillomavirus E7-expressing skin through an IFN-γ-dependent mechanism. In this study, we examined the role of systemically derived NKT cells in regulating the rejection of skin grafts expressing viral proteins. In lymph nodes draining transplanted skin, Ag-specific CD8 T cell proliferation, cytokine production, and cytotoxic activity were impaired by NKT cells. NKT cell suppression was mediated via CD11c(+) dendritic cells. Inhibition of CD8 T cell function did not require Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells or NKT cell-secreted IFN-γ, IL-10, or IL-17. Thus, following skin grafting or immunization with human papillomavirus-E7 oncoprotein, NKT cells reduce the capacity of draining lymph node-resident APCs to cross-present Ag to CD8 T cell precursors, as evidenced by impaired expansion and differentiation to Ag-specific CD8 T effector cells. Therefore, in the context of viral Ag challenge in the skin, systemic NKT cells limit the capacity for effective priming of adaptive immunity.     

Deletion of naive CD8 T cells requires persistent antigen and is not programmed by an initial signal from the tolerogenic APC

Activation of naive CD8 T cells in vivo requires the recognition of cognate peptide-MHC complexes on APCs. Depending upon the activation status of the APC, such recognition will promote either a vigorous immune response or T cell tolerance and deletion. Recent studies suggest that the initial signals provided by APCs are sufficient to program the proliferation of naive CD8 T cells and their differentiation into effector cells. In this study, we sought to determine whether an initial encounter with tolerogenic APCs was sufficient to program deletion of naive CD8 T cells. Surprisingly, we find that regardless of whether naive CD8 T cells were stimulated by activated or quiescent APCs, transfer of the activated T cells into an Ag-free host was sufficient to ensure survival. Thus, although the extent of clonal expansion and development of effector function is determined by the activation status of the stimulatory APC, peripheral clonal deletion requires persistent Ag and is not determined by the initial stimulatory event.     

Anergy in memory CD4+ T cells is induced by B cells

Induction of tolerance in memory T cells has profound implications in the treatment of autoimmune diseases and transplant rejection. Previously, we reported that the presentation of low densities of agonist peptide/MHC class II complexes induced anergy in memory CD4(+) T cells. In the present study, we address the specific interaction of different types of APCs with memory CD4(+) T cells. A novel ex vivo anergy assay first suggested that B cells induce anergy in memory T cells, and an in vivo cell transfer assay further confirmed those observations. We demonstrated that B cells pulsed with defined doses of Ag anergize memory CD4 cells in vivo. We established that CD11c(+) dendritic cells do not contribute to anergy induction to CD4 memory T cells, because diphtheria toxin receptor-transgenic mice that were conditionally depleted of dendritic cells optimally induced anergy in memory CD4(+) T cells. Moreover, B cell-deficient muMT mice did not induce anergy in memory T cells. We showed that B2 follicular B cells are the specific subpopulation of B cells that render memory T cells anergic. Furthermore, we present data showing that anergy in this system is mediated by CTLA-4 up-regulation on T cells. This is the first study to demonstrate formally that B cells are the APCs that induce anergy in memory CD4(+) T cells.     

Th1 and Th2 cell clones to a poorly immunogenic tumor antigen initiate CD8+ T cell-dependent tumor eradication in vivo

Although CD8(+) T cells play a central role as immune effectors, CD4(+) T cells act to control the activation and persistence of the CD8(+) T cell response in autoimmune disease, antiviral immunity, and experimental systems with immunogenic model tumor Ag. However, little information is available on the effects of CD4(+) T cells on the function of endogenous CD8(+) T lymphocytes recognizing authentic tumor rejection Ag with limited immunogenicity. We report here that the prophylactic or postchallenge administration of T helper Th1-type and Th2-type CD4(+) clones specific for an unmutated rejection Ag (murine P815AB, resembling tumor-specific shared Ag in humans) leads to the induction of P815AB-specific reactivity in vivo and concomitant tumor destruction, with quantitative rather than qualitative differences characterizing the antitumor activity of Th1 vs Th2 cells. Because the transferred CD4(+) cells lacked direct antitumor activity in vitro and required the de novo generation of P815AB-specific CD8(+) T cells in vivo, these findings suggest that CD4(+) lymphocytes can enhance the ability of host APC to initiate an endogenous CD8(+) T cell response to authentic, poorly immunogenic tumor rejection Ag.     

Plasmodium berghei-infected primary hepatocytes process and present the circumsporozoite protein to specific CD8+ T cells in vitro

A substantial and protective response against malaria liver stages is directed against the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) and involves induction of CD8(+) T cells and production of IFN-gamma. CSP-derived peptides have been shown to be presented on the surface of infected hepatocytes in the context of MHC class I molecules. However, little is known about how the CSP and other sporozoite Ags are processed and presented to CD8(+) T cells. We investigated how primary hepatocytes from BALB/c mice process the CSP of Plasmodium berghei after live sporozoite infection and present CSP-derived peptides to specific H-2K(d)-restricted CD8(+) T cells in vitro. Using both wild-type and spect(-/-) P. berghei sporozoites, we show that both infected and traversed primary hepatocytes process and present the CSP. The processing and presentation pathway was found to involve the proteasome, Ag transport through a postendoplasmic reticulum compartment, and aspartic proteases. Thus, it can be hypothesized that infected hepatocytes can contribute in vivo to the elicitation and expansion of a T cell response.     

Passive and active mechanisms trap activated CD8+ T cells in the liver

The liver is a site where activated CD8(+) T cells are trapped and destroyed at the end of an immune response. The intrahepatic accumulation of activated murine TCR transgenic CD8(+) T cells was significantly reduced when either ICAM-1 or VCAM-1 was blocked by specific Ab. These two adhesion mechanisms account for essentially all the trapping of activated CD8(+) T cells in the mouse liver. Although the ICAM-1-mediated trapping depends on the capacity of the vasculature and/or the parenchymal cells to present Ag, the accumulation of cells through VCAM-1 does not require Ag recognition. Thus, Ags expressed by the non-bone marrow-derived cells in the liver actively cause CD8(+) T cell accumulation through TCR-activated ICAM-1 adhesion, but the liver can also passively sequester activated CD8(+) T cells that do not recognize intrahepatic Ag, through VCAM-1 adhesion.     

Enhanced antigen processing of flagellin fusion proteins promotes the antigen-specific CD8+ T cell response independently of TLR5 and MyD88

Flagellin is a highly effective adjuvant for CD4(+) T cell and humoral immune responses. However, there is conflicting data in the literature regarding the ability of flagellin to promote a CD8(+) T cell response. In this article, we report that immunization of wild-type, TLR5(-/-), and MyD88(-/-) adoptive transfer recipient mice revealed the ability of flagellin fusion proteins to promote OVA-specific CD8(+) T cell proliferation independent of TLR5 or MyD88 expression by the recipient animal. Wild-type and TLR5(-/-) APCs were able to stimulate high levels of OVA-specific CD8(+) T cell proliferation in vitro in response to a flagellin fusion protein containing full-length OVA or the SIINFEKL epitope and 10 flanking amino acids (OVAe), but not to OVA and flagellin added as separate proteins. This effect was independent of the conserved regions of flagellin and occurred in response to OVAe alone. Comparison of IFN-γ production by CD8(+) effector cells revealed higher levels of SIINFEKL peptide-MHC I complexes on the surface of APCs that had been pulsed with OVAe-flagellin fusion proteins than on cells pulsed with OVA. Inhibition of the proteasome significantly reduced Ag-specific proliferation in response to OVAe fusion proteins. In summary, our data are consistent with the conclusion that flagellin-OVA fusion proteins induce an epitope-specific CD8(+) T cell response by facilitating Ag processing and not through stimulatory signaling via TLR5 and MyD88. Our findings raise the possibility that flagellin might be an efficient Ag carrier for Ags that are poorly processed in their native state.     

CD40 on APCs is needed for optimal programming, maintenance, and recall of CD8+ T cell memory even in the absence of CD4+ T cell help

CD40 stimulation is one of the many signals that can activate APCs and we have recently shown it to have a unique function in generating maximum primary CD8(+) T cell responses. However, whether CD40 signaling plays a role in memory CD8(+) T cell responses is still not completely understood. In this study, we show that in the absence of CD40 on all APCs or specifically on dendritic cells, memory CD8(+) T cells are generated but at significantly reduced levels. This reduction is due to a contribution of CD40 at several different steps in the generation of CD8(+) memory. In the initial T cell response, CD40 contributes to maximizing not only the number of effector cells that are generated but also the programming of ones that will differentiate into memory. Subsequently, CD40 is needed to maintain maximal numbers of the committed memory cells in a manner that is independent of the immunizing Ag. Finally, when memory CD8(+) T cells are reactivated there is a variable requirement for CD40 depending on whether CD40 or CD4(+) Th cells were present during the primary response. Therefore, CD40 signaling on APCs plays an important role in all phases of a memory CD8(+) T cell response.