IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DIATOM MULTIPARTATE PLASTID TARGETING SIGNAL

Diatoms and related algae have plastids that are surrounded by four membranes. The outer two membranes are continuous with the endoplasmic reticulum and the inner two membranes are analogous to the plastid envelope membranes of higher plants and green algae. Thus the plastids are completely compartmentalized within the ER membranes. The targeting presequences for nuclear‐encoded plastid proteins have two recognizable domains. The first domain is a classic signal sequence, which presumably targets the proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. The second domain has characteristics of a transit peptide, which targets proteins to the plastids of higher plants. To characterize these targeting domains, the presequence from the nuclear‐encoded plastid protein AtpC was utilized. A series of deletions of this presequence were fused to Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) and transformed into cells of the diatom, Phaeodactylum tricornutum. The intracelluar localization of GFP was visualized by fluorescence microscopy. This work demonstrates that the first domain of the presequence is responsible for targeting proteins to the ER lumen and is the essential first step in the plastid protein import process. The second domain is responsible to directing proteins from the ER and through the plastid envelope and only a short portion of the transit peptide‐like domain is necessary to complete this second processing step. In vivo data generated from this study in a fully homologous transformation system has confirmed Gibbs' hypothesis regarding a multistep import process for plastid proteins in chromophytic algae.     

Internal plastid-targeting signal found in a RubisCO small subunit protein of a chlorarachniophyte alga

In all plants and algae, most plastid proteins are encoded by the nuclear genome and, consequently, need to be transported into plastids across multiple membranes. In organisms with secondary plastids, which evolved by secondary endosymbioses, and are surrounded by three or four envelope membranes, precursors of nuclear-encoded plastid proteins generally have an N-terminal bipartite targeting sequence that consists of an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-targeting signal peptide (SP) and a transit peptide-like (TPL) sequence. The bipartite targeting sequences have been demonstrated to be necessary and sufficient for targeting proteins into the plastids of many algal groups, including chlorarachniophytes. Here, we report a new type of targeting signal that is required for delivering a RubisCO small subunit (RbcS) protein into the secondary plastids of chlorarachniophyte algae. In this study, we analyzed the plastid-targeting ability of an RbcS pre-protein, using green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter molecule in chlorarachniophyte cells. We demonstrate that the N-terminal bipartite targeting sequence of the RbcS pre-protein is not sufficient, and that a part of the mature protein is also necessary for plastid targeting. By deletion analyses of amino acids, we determined the approximate location of an internal plastid-targeting signal within the mature protein, which is involved in targeting the protein from the ER into the chlorarachniophyte plastids.     

Identification and characterization of a new conserved motif within the presequence of proteins targeted into complex diatom plastids

Several groups of algae evolved by secondary endocytobiosis, which is defined as the uptake of a eukaryotic alga into a eukaryotic host cell and the subsequent transformation of the endosymbiont into an organelle. Due to this explicit evolutionary history such algae possess plastids that are surrounded by either three or four membranes. Protein targeting into plastids of these organisms depends on N-terminal bipartite presequences consisting of a signal and a transit peptide domain. This suggests that different protein targeting systems may have been combined during establishment of secondary endocytobiosis to enable the transport of proteins into the plastids. Here we demonstrate the presence of an apparently new type of transport into diatom plastids. We analyzed protein targeting into the plastids of diatoms and identified a conserved amino acid sequence motif within plastid preprotein targeting sequences. We expressed several diatom plastid presequence:GFP fusion proteins with or without modifications within that motif in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum and found that a single conserved phenylalanine is crucial for protein transport into the diatom plastids in vivo, thus indicating the presence of a so far unknown new type of targeting signal. We also provide experimental data about the minimal requirements of a diatom plastid targeting presequence and demonstrate that the signal peptides of plastid preproteins and of endoplasmic reticulum-targeted preproteins in diatoms are functionally equivalent. Furthermore we show that treatment of the cells with Brefeldin A arrests protein transport into the diatom plastids suggesting that a vesicular transport step within the plastid membranes may occur.     

ENDOMEMBRANE STRUCTURE AND THE CHLOROPLAST PROTEIN TARGETING PATHWAY IN HETEROSIGMA AKASHIWO (RAPHIDOPHYCEAE, CHROMISTA)

Chloroplasts in heterokont algae are surrounded by four membranes and probably originated from a red algal endosymbiont that was engulfed and retained by eukaryotic host. Understanding how nuclear-encoded chloroplast proteins are translocated from the cytoplasm into the chloroplast across these membranes could give us some insights about how the endosymbiont was integrated into the host cell in the process of secondary symbiogenesis. In multiplastid heterokont algae such as raphidophytes, it has been unclear if the outermost of the four membranes surrounding the chloroplast (the chloroplast endoplasmic reticulum [CER] membrane) is continuous with the nuclear envelope and rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Here, we report detailed ultrastructural observations of the raphidophyte Heterosigma akashiwo (Hada) Hada ex Y. Hara et Chihara that show that the CER membranes were continuous with ER membranes that had attached ribosomes, implying that the chloroplast with three envelope membranes is located within the ER lumen, that is, topologically the same structure as that of monoplastid heterokont algae. However, the CER membrane of H. akashiwo had very few, if any, ribosomes attached, unlike the CER membranes in other heterokont algae. To verify that proteins are first targeted to the ER, we assayed protein import into canine microsomes using a precursor for a nuclear-encoded chloroplast protein, the fucoxanthin-chlorophyll a / c protein of H. akashiwo. This demonstrated that the precursor has a functional signal sequence for ER targeting and is cotranslationally translocated into the ER, where a signal sequence of about 17 amino acids is removed. Based on these data, we hypothesize that in H. akashiwo , nuclear-encoded chloroplast protein precursors that have been cotranslationally transported into the ER lumen are sorted in the ER and transported to the chloroplasts through the ER lumen.     

Protein targeting into complex diatom plastids: functional characterisation of a specific targeting motif

Plastids of diatoms and related algae evolved by secondary endocytobiosis, the uptake of a eukaryotic alga into a eukaryotic host cell and its subsequent reduction into an organelle. As a result diatom plastids are surrounded by four membranes. Protein targeting of nucleus encoded plastid proteins across these membranes depends on N-terminal bipartite presequences consisting of a signal and a transit peptide-like domain. Diatoms and cryptophytes share a conserved amino acid motif of unknown function at the cleavage site of the signal peptides (ASAFAP), which is particularly important for successful plastid targeting. Screening genomic databases we found that in rare cases the very conserved phenylalanine within the motif may be replaced by tryptophan, tyrosine or leucine. To test such unusual presequences for functionality and to better understand the role of the motif and putative receptor proteins involved in targeting, we constructed presequence:GFP fusion proteins with or without modifications of the “ASAFAP”-motif and expressed them in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. In this comprehensive mutational analysis we found that only the aromatic amino acids phenylalanine, tryptophan, tyrosine and the bulky amino acid leucine at the +1 position of the predicted signal peptidase cleavage site allow plastid import, as expected from the sequence comparison of native plastid targeting presequences of P. tricornutum and the cryptophyte Guillardia theta. Deletions within the signal peptide domains also impaired plastid import, showing that the presence of F at the N-terminus of the transit peptide together with a cleavable signal peptide is crucial for plastid import. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. A. Gruber and S. Vugrinec contributed equally to this work.     

Is Protein Import into Plastids with Four‐Membrane Envelopes Dependent on Two Toc Systems Operating in Tandem?

Abstract: Plastids with four‐membrane envelopes have evolved by several independent endosymbioses involving a eukaryotic alga as the endosymbiont and a protozoan predator as the host. It is assumed that their outermost membrane is derived from the phagosomal membrane of the host and that protein targeting to and across this membrane proceeds co‐translationally, including ER and the Golgi apparatus (e.g., chlorarachniophytes) or only ER (e.g., heterokonts). Since the two inner membranes (or the plastid envelope) of such a complex plastid are derived from the endosymbiont plastid, they are probably provided with Toc and Tic systems, enabling post‐translational passage of the imported proteins into the stroma. The third envelope membrane, or the periplastid one, originates from the endosymbiont plasmalemma, but what import apparatus operates in it remains enigmatic. Recently, Cavalier‐Smith (1999^[5]) has proposed that the Toc system, pre‐existing in the endosymbiont plastid, has been relocated to the periplastid membrane, and that plastids having four envelope membranes contain two Toc systems operating in tandem and requiring the same targeting sequence, i.e., the transit peptide. Although this model is parsimonious, it encounters several serious obstacles, the most serious one resulting from the complex biogenesis of Toc75 which forms a translocation pore. In contrast to most proteins targeted to the outer membrane of the plastid envelope, this protein carries a complex transit peptide, indicating that a successful integration of the Toc system into the periplastid membrane would have to be accompanied by relocation of the stromal processing peptidase to the endosymbiont cytosol. However, such a relocation would be catastrophic because this enzyme would cleave the transit peptide off all plastid‐destined proteins, thus disabling biogenesis of the plastid compartment. Considering these difficulties, I suggest that in periplastid membranes two Toc‐independent translocation apparatuses have evolved: a porin‐like channel in chlorarachniophytes and cryptophytes, and a vesicular pathway in heterokonts and haptophytes. Since simultaneous evolution of a new transport system in the periplastid membrane and in the phagosomal one would be complicated, it is argued that plastids with four‐membrane envelopes have evolved by replacement of plastids with three‐membrane envelopes. I suggest that during the first round of secondary endosymbioses (resulting in plastids surrounded by three membranes), myzocytotically‐engulfed eukaryotic alga developed a Golgi‐mediated targeting pathway which was added to the Toc/Tic‐based apparatus of the endosymbiont plastid. During the second round of secondary endosymbioses (resulting in plastids surrounded by four membranes), phagocytotically‐engulfed eukaryotic alga exploited the Golgi pathway of the original plastid, and a new translocation system had to originate only in the periplastid membrane, although its emergence probably resulted in modification of the import machinery pre‐existing in the endosymbiont plastid.     

Mechanism of Protein Targeting to the Chlorarachniophyte Plastids and the Evolution of Complex Plastids with Four Membranes — A Hypothesis

Chlorarachniophyta are phototrophic amoeboflagellates, with plastids surrounded by four membranes. Contrary to other plastids of this type which occur in chromists, their outermost membrane bears no ribosomes. It is argued that the nuclear-encoded chlorarachniophyte plastid proteins are first transported into the ER, then to the Colgi apparatus, and finally to the plastids. The same import mechanism could be originally present in the chromist ancestor, prior to the fusion of their plastids with the RER membranes. According to the most recent concept, the complex plastids of Chromista and Chlorarachniophyta have evolved through replacement of the cyanobacterial plastids. The assumption that these plastids had an envelope composed not of two, but of three membranes makes it possible to avoid the erlier discerned difficulties with conversion of a eukaryotic alga into a complex plastid. My scenario provides an additional support to the hypothesis on polyphy-letic origin of four-membraned plastids.     

Complex protein targeting to dinoflagellate plastids

Protein trafficking pathways to plastids are directed by N-terminal targeting peptides. In plants this consists of a relatively simple transit peptide, while in organisms with secondary plastids (which reside within the endomembrane system) a signal peptide is appended to the transit peptide. Despite amino acid compositional differences between organisms, often due to nucleotide biases, the features of plastid targeting sequences are generally consistent within species. Dinoflagellate algae deviate from this trend. We have conducted an expressed sequence tag (EST) survey of the peridinin-plastid containing dinoflagellate Heterocapsa triquetra to identify and characterize numerous targeting presequences of plastid proteins encoded in the nucleus. Consistent with targeting systems present in other secondary plastid-containing organisms, these all possess a canonical signal peptide at their N termini, however two major classes of transit peptides occur. Both classes possess a common N-terminal portion of the transit peptide, but one class of transit peptides contains a hydrophobic domain that has been reported to act as a stop-transfer membrane anchor, temporarily arresting protein insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum. A second class of transit peptide lacks this feature. These two classes are represented approximately equally, and for any given protein the class is conserved across all dinoflagellate taxa surveyed to date. This dichotomy suggests that two mechanisms, perhaps even trafficking routes, may direct proteins to dinoflagellate plastids. A four-residue phenylalanine-based motif is also a consistent feature of H. triquetra transit peptides, which is an ancient feature predating red algae and galucophytes that was lost in green plastids.     

Evidence for an ER to Golgi to chloroplast protein transport pathway

Chloroplast protein import is generally believed to occur posttranslationally through the interaction of a precursor protein with the Toc and Tic transport apparatus in the plastid envelope membranes. The cleavable N-terminal transit peptide present on translocated proteins has been considered to be essential and sufficient for targeting. This idea was recently challenged when an analysis of the chloroplast proteome revealed many proteins without a predicted transit peptide. A recent study demonstrates the existence of a novel chloroplast targeting pathway, starting with protein entry into the endoplasmic reticulum and involving the Golgi apparatus.     

Heterologous signals allow efficient targeting of a nuclear-encoded fusion protein to plastids and endoplasmic reticulum in diverse plant species

Approximately 30% of plant nuclear genes appear to encode proteins targeted to the plastids or endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The signals that direct proteins into these compartments are diverse in sequence, but, on the basis of a limited number of tests in heterologous systems, they appear to be functionally conserved across species. To further test the generality of this conclusion, we tested the ability of two plastid transit peptides and an ER signal peptide to target green fluorescent protein (GFP) in 12 crops, including three monocots (barley, sugarcane, wheat) and nine dicots ( Arabidopsis , broccoli, cabbage, carrot, cauliflower, lettuce, radish, tobacco, turnip). In all species, transient assays following microprojectile bombardment or vacuum infiltration using Agrobacterium showed that the plastid transit peptides from tomato DCL (defective chloroplast and leaves) and tobacco RbcS [ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco) small subunit] genes were effective in targeting GFP to the leaf plastids. GFP engineered as a fusion to the N-terminal ER signal peptide from Arabidopsis basic chitinase and a C-terminal HDEL signal for protein retention in the ER was accumulated in the ER of all species. The results in tobacco were confirmed in stably transformed cells. These signal sequences should be useful to direct proteins to the plastid stroma or ER lumen in diverse plant species of biotechnological interest for the accumulation of particular recombinant proteins or for the modification of particular metabolic streams.     

Protein import into cyanelles and complex chloroplasts

Higher-plant, green and red algal chloroplasts are surrounded by a double membrane envelope. The glaucocystophyte plastid (cyanelle) has retained a prokaryotic cell wall between the two envelope membranes. The complex chloroplasts of Euglena and dinoflagellates are surrounded by three membranes while the complex chloroplasts of chlorarachniophytes, cryptomonads, brown algae, diatoms and other chromophytes, are surrounded by 4 membranes. The peptidoglycan layer of the cyanelle envelope and the additional membranes of complex chloroplasts provide barriers to chloroplast protein import not present in the simpler double membrane chloroplast envelope. Analysis of presequence structure and in vitro import experiments indicate that proteins are imported directly from the cytoplasm across the two envelope membranes and peptidoglycan layer into cyanelles. Protein import into complex chloroplasts is however fundamentally different. Analysis of presequence structure and in vitro import into microsomal membranes has shown that translocation into the ER is the first step for protein import into complex chloroplasts enclosed by three or four membranes. In vivo pulse chase experiments and immunoelectronmicroscopy have shown that in Euglena, proteins are transported from the ER to the Golgi apparatus prior to import across the three chloroplast membranes. Ultrastructural studies and the presence of ribosomes on the outermost of the four envelope membranes suggests protein import into 4 membrane-bounded complex chloroplasts is directly from the ER like outermost membrane into the chloroplast. The fundamental difference in import mechanisms, post-translational direct chloroplast import or co-translational translocation into the ER prior to chloroplast import, appears to reflect the evolutionary origin of the different chloroplast types. Chloroplasts with a two-membrane envelope are thought to have evolved through the primary endosymbiotic association between a eukaryotic host and a photosynthetic prokaryote while complex chloroplasts are believed to have evolved through a secondary endosymbiotic association between a heterotrophic or possibly phototrophic eukaryotic host and a photosynthetic eukaryote.     

Genome-based reconstruction of the protein import machinery in the secondary plastid of a chlorarachniophyte alga

Most plastid proteins are encoded by their nuclear genomes and need to be targeted across multiple envelope membranes. In vascular plants, the translocons at the outer and inner envelope membranes of chloroplasts (TOC and TIC, respectively) facilitate transport across the two plastid membranes. In contrast, several algal groups harbor more complex plastids, the so-called secondary plastids, which are surrounded by three or four membranes, but the plastid protein import machinery (in particular, how proteins cross the membrane corresponding to the secondary endosymbiont plasma membrane) remains unexplored in many of these algae. To reconstruct the putative protein import machinery of a secondary plastid, we used the chlorarachniophyte alga Bigelowiella natans, whose plastid is bounded by four membranes and still possesses a relict nucleus of a green algal endosymbiont (the nucleomorph) in the intermembrane space. We identified nine homologs of plant-like TOC/TIC components in the recently sequenced B. natans nuclear genome, adding to the two that remain in the nucleomorph genome (B. natans TOC75 [BnTOC75] and BnTIC20). All of these proteins were predicted to be localized to the plastid and might function in the inner two membranes. We also show that the homologs of a protein, Der1, that is known to mediate transport across the second membrane in the several lineages with secondary plastids of red algal origin is not associated with plastid protein targeting in B. natans. How plastid proteins cross this membrane remains a mystery, but it is clear that the protein transport machinery of chlorarachniophyte plastids differs from that of red algal secondary plastids.     

Analysis of the targeting sequences of an iron-containing superoxide dismutase (SOD) of the dinoflagellate <Emphasis Type="Italic">Lingulodinium polyedrum</Emphasis> suggests function in multiple cellular compartments

One of the proteins targeted to the peridinin plastid of the dinoflagellate Lingulodinium polyedrum is the iron-containing superoxide dismutase (LpSOD). Like dinoflagellate plastid proteins of class II, LpSOD carries a bipartite presequence comprising a signal peptide followed by a transit peptide. Our bioinformatic studies suggest that its signal peptide is atypical, however, and that the entire presequence may function as a mitochondrial targeting signal. It is possible that LpSOD represents a new class of proteins in algae with complex plastids, which are co-targeted to the plastid and mitochondrion. In addition to the ambiguous N-terminal targeting signal, LpSOD contains a potential type-1 peroxisome-targeting signal (PTS1) located at its C-terminus. In accordance with a peroxisome localization of this dismutase, its mRNA has two in-frame AUG codons. Our bioinformatic analyses indicate that the first start codon resides in a much weaker oligonucleotide context than the second one. This suggests that synthesis of the plastid/mitochondrion-targeted and peroxisome-targeted isoforms could proceed through so-called leaky scanning. Moreover, our results show that expression of the two isoforms could be regulated by a 'hairpin' structure located between the first and second start codons.     

The ultrastructural features and division of secondary plastids

Plastids in heterokonts, cryptophytes, haptophytes, dinoflagellates, chlorarachniophytes, euglenoids, and apicomplexan parasites derive from secondary symbiogenesis. These plastids are surrounded by one or two additional membranes covering the plastid-envelope double membranes. Consequently, nuclear-encoded plastid division proteins have to be targeted into the division site through the additional surrounding membranes. Electron microscopic observations suggest that the additional surrounding membranes are severed by mechanisms distinct from those for the division of the plastid envelope. In heterokonts, cryptophytes and haptophytes, the outermost surrounding membrane (epiplastid rough endoplasmic reticulum, EPrER) is studded with cytoplasmic ribosomes and connected to the rER and the outer nuclear envelope. In monoplastidic species belonging to these three groups, the EPrER and the outer nuclear envelope are directly connected to form a sac enclosing the plastid and the nucleus. This nuclear-plastid connection, referred to as the nucleus-plastid consortium (NPC), may be significant to ensure the transmission of the plastids during cell division. The plastid dividing-ring (PD-ring) is a conserved component of the division machinery for both primary and secondary plastids. Also, homologues of the bacterial cell division protein, FtsZ, may be involved in the division of secondary plastids as well as primary plastids, though in secondary plastids they have not yet been localized to the division site. It remains to be examined whether or not dynamin-like proteins and other protein components known to function in the division of primary plastids are used also in secondary plastids. The nearly completed sequencing of the nuclear genome of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana will give impetus to molecular and cell biological studies on the division of secondary plastids.     

Structure of amyloplasts and endoplasmic reticulum in the root caps of Lepidium sativum and Zea mays observed after selective membrane staining and by high-voltage electron microscopy

The structure of plastids in the root cap of cress and maize was studied by low- and high-voltage electron microscopy after staining their membranes with a mixture of zinc iodide and osmium tetroxide. In plastids of both species electron-opaque membranes were found in the plastid interior while membranes of lesser electron-opacity comprised the outer envelope and vesicles and cisternae underlying it. Electron-opaque tubules, often in groups attached to the inner membrane of the amyloplast envelope, were found in cress but not in maize. The internal, less-opaque membranes were often found associated with the starch grains. No specific association could be seen between amyloplasts and endoplasmic reticulum (ER); their surfaces showed no regular contact or connexion, though the amyloplasts clearly indented the underlying ER. The ER in statocytes was predominantly tubular in cress but predominantly cisternal in maize.Abbreviations ER endoplasmic reticulum - ZIO zinc iodideosmium tetroxide     

Visualisation of plastids in endosperm,pollen and roots of transgenic wheat expressing modified GFP fused to transit peptides from wheat SSU RubisCO,rice FtsZ and maize ferredoxin III proteins

The ability to target marker proteins to specific subcellular compartments is a powerful research tool to study the structure and development of organelles. Here transit sequences from nuclear-encoded, plastid proteins, namely rice FtsZ, maize non-photosynthetic ferredoxin III (FdIII) and the small subunit of RubisCO were used to target a modified synthetic GFP (S65G, S72A) to plastids. The localisations of the fusion proteins expressed in transgenic wheat plants and under the control of the rice actin promoter were compared to an untargeted GFP control. GFP fluorescence was localised to non-green plastids in pollen, roots and seed endosperm and detected in isolated leaf chloroplasts using a GFP-specific antibody. Transit peptides appeared to influence the relative fluorescence intensities of plastids in different tissues. This is consistent with differential targeting and/or turnover of GFP fusion proteins in different plastid types. Replacement of GFP sequences with alternative coding regions enables immediate applications of our vectors for academic research and commercial applications.     

The paradox of plastid transit peptides: conservation of function despite divergence in primary structure.

Transit peptides are N-terminal extensions that facilitate the targeting and translocation of cytosolically synthesized precursors into plastids via a post-translational mechanism. With the complete Arabidopsis genome in hand, it is now evident that transit peptides direct more than 3500 different proteins into the plastid during the life of a typical plant. Deciphering a common mechanism for how this multitude of targeting sequences function has been hampered by the realization that at a primary sequence level, transit peptides are highly divergent in length, composition, and organization. This review addresses recent findings on several of the diverse functions that transit peptides must perform, including direct interaction with envelope lipids, association with a cis-acting guidance complex, recognition by envelope receptors, insertion into the Toc/Tic translocon, interaction with molecular motors, and finally, recognition/cleavage by the stromal processing peptidase. In addition to higher plants, transit peptides also direct the import of proteins into complex plastids derived from secondary endosymbiosis. An emerging concept suggests that transit peptides contain multiple domains that provide either distinct or possibly overlapping functions. Although still poorly characterized, evolutionary processes could yield transit peptides with alternative domain organizations.     

Protein targeting to the chloroplasts of photosynthetic eukaryotes: getting there is half the fun

The plastids of many algae are surrounded by three or four membranes, thought to be a consequence of their evolutionary origin through secondary endosymbiosis between photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic eukaryotes. Each membrane constitutes a barrier to the passage of proteins, so protein targeting in these complex plastids has an extra level of difficulty when compared to higher plants. In the latter, protein translocation across the two membranes uses multi-protein complexes that together import proteins possessing an N-terminal leader sequence rich in serine and threonine (S/T). In contrast, while targeting to most complex plastids also involves an S/T-rich region, this region is preceded by an N-terminal hydrophobic signal peptide. This arrangement of peptide sequences suggests that proteins directed to complex plastids pass through the ER, as do other proteins with hydrophobic signal peptides. However, this simplistic view is not always easy to reconcile with what is known about the different secondary plastids. In the first group, with plastids bounded by three membranes, plastid-directed proteins do indeed arrive in Golgi-derived vesicles, but a second hydrophobic region follows the S/T-rich region in all leaders. In the second group, where four membranes completely surround the plastids, it is still not known how the proteins arrive at the plastids, and in addition, one member of this group uses a targeting signal rich in asparagine and lysine in place of the S/T-rich region. In the third group, the fourth bounding membrane is contiguous with the ER, but it is not clear what distinguishes plastid membranes from others in the endomembrane system. Knowing what to expect is important, as genomic sequencing programs may soon be turning up some of the missing pieces in these translocation puzzles.     

Homologous protein import machineries in chloroplasts and cyanelles

The cyanelles of the glaucocystophyte alga Cyanophora paradoxa resemble endosymbiotic cyanobacteria, especially in the presence of a peptidoglycan wall between the inner and outer envelope membranes. However, it is now clear that cyanelles are in fact primitive plastids. Phylogenetic analyses of plastid, nuclear and mitochondrial genes support a single primary endosymbiotic event. In this scenario, cyanelles and all other plastid types are derived from an ancestral photosynthetic organelle combining the high gene content of rhodoplasts and the peptidoglycan wall of cyanelles. This means that the import apparatuses of all primary plastids, i.e. those from glaucocystophytes, red algae, green algae and higher plants, should be homologous. If this is the case, then transit sequences should be similar and heterologous import experiments feasible. Thus far, heterologous in vitro import has been shown in one direction only: precursors from C. paradoxa were imported into isolated pea or spinach chloroplasts. Cyanelle transit sequences differ from chloroplast stroma targeting peptides in containing in their N-terminal domain an invariant phenylalanine residue which is shown here to be crucial for import. In addition, we now demonstrate that heterologous precursors are readily imported into isolated cyanelles, provided that the essential phenylalanine residue is engineered into the N-terminal part of chloroplast transit peptides. The cyanelle and likely also the rhodoplast import apparatus can be envisaged as prototypes with a single receptor/channel showing this requirement for N-terminal phenylalanine. In chloroplasts, multiple receptors with overlapping and less stringent specificities have evolved, explaining the efficient heterologous import of native precursors from C. paradoxa.