The cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein complex functions both as an activator and as a corepressor at the tsx-p2 promoter of Escherichia coli K-12.

The tsx-p2 promoter is one of at least seven Escherichia coli promoters that are activated by the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein (CRP) complex and negatively regulated by the CytR repressor. DNase I footprinting assays were used to study the interactions of these regulatory proteins with the tsx-p2 promoter region and to characterize tsx-p2 regulatory mutants exhibiting an altered response to CytR. We show that the cAMP-CRP activator complex recognizes two sites in tsx-p2 that are separated by 33 bp: a high-affinity site (CRP-1) overlaps the -35 region, and a low-affinity site (CRP-2) is centered around position -74 bp. The CytR repressor protects a DNA segment that is located between the two CRP sites and partially overlaps the CRP-1 target. In combination, the cAMP-CRP and CytR proteins bind cooperatively to tsx-p2, and the nucleoprotein complex formed covers a region of 78 bp extending from the CRP-2 site close to the -10 region. The inducer for the CytR repressor, cytidine, does not prevent in vitro DNA binding of CytR, but releases the repressor from the nucleoprotein complex and leaves the cAMP-CRP activator bound to its two DNA targets. Thus, cytidine interferes with the cooperative DNA binding of cAMP-CRP and CytR to tsx-p2. We characterized four tsx-p2 mutants exhibiting a reduced response to CytR; three carried mutations in the CRP-2 site, and one carried a mutation in the region between CRP-1 and the -10 sequence. Formation of the cAMP-CRP-CytR DNA nucleoprotein complex in vitro was perturbed in each mutant. These data indicate that the CytR repressor relies on the presence of the cAMP-CRP activator complex to regulate tsx-p2 promoter activity and that the formation of an active repression complex requires the combined interactions of cAMP-CRP and CytR at tsx-p2.     

Interaction of negative (CytT) and positive (cAMP-CRP) regulation in the promoter region of the uridine phosphorylase (udp) gene in Escherichia coli K-12

Interaction of negative (CytR) and positive (cAMP-CRP) control in the promoter region of the uridine phosphorylase (udp) gene of Escherichia coli has been studied by using udp-lac operon fusions in which the structural lacZ gene is expressed from the wild type promoter udpP+ or from mutant promoters udpP1 and udpP18. The specific activity of beta-galactosidase was examined in these fusions in cytR+ and cytR- backgrounds after introduction of specific mutations in crp locus, crp* and crp(a) altering interaction of CRP protein with catabolite-sensitive promoters. The data obtained using crp* mutation confirm the proposed model of the udp gene regulation, according to which CytR repressor protein interferes with CRP binding site in the promoter-operator region of the udp gene and thereby prevents the positive action of cAMP-CRP complex on the udp expression. Additional data in favor of this model were obtained using crp(a) mutation which most probably alters the structure of CRP protein in such a way that it exhibits more high affinity to the udp promoter, as compared to the CytR repressor protein. Indeed, taken by itself, the crp(a) mutation did not lead to any increase in the expression of udpP+-lac fusion under the conditions of cAMP limitation (on glucose-grown cells), in spite of whether or not the CytR repressor was present. However, when combined with the ptsG mutation or when cells were grown on succinate medium, complete constitutive expression of udpP+-lac fusion is observed, even in the presence of the cytR gene product. The effect of the crp(a) mutation was virtually the same in strains harboring udpP1-lac fusion. These data are in accordance with suggestion that udpP1 is a mutation in the site of the promoter-operator region that responds to the cytR gene product, while the corresponding binding site for CRP protein is still unaltered in this mutant. On the other hand, the crp(a) mutation causes only slight alteration in the expression of udpP18-lac fusion, providing additional evidence that udpP18 mutation seems to comprise a modification of the promoter-operator region, where binding sites for CRP and CytR proteins overlap.     

Promoter-like mutants with increased expression of the Escherichia coli uridine phosphorylase structural gene.

From an Escherichia coli K-12 strain lacking adenylate cyclase (cya) and cyclic AMP receptor protein (crp), two mutants were isolated that synthesize uridine phosphorylase constitutively. The mutations differ from one another and also from a wild type in the maximum rate of uridine phosphorylase synthesis. They have constitutive expression of the uridine phosphorylase gene (udp) in the presence of repressor protein coded by the cytR regulatory gene and decrease the sensitivity of the udp gene simultaneously with catabolite repression. Both mutations cause a high level of udp expression whether they are in a cya crp or in a cya+ crp+ background. Another mutation (udpP1) isolated previously alters the response of udp gene to the ctyR repressor and produces a higher constitutive level of uridine phosphorylase in a cytR+ than in a cytR background when bacteria are grown in glucose. The synthesis of uridine phosphorylase in this mutant is dependent on an intact cyclic AMP-cyclic AMP receptor protein complex. All mutations studied are cis-acting and extremely closely linked to the udp structural gene, and appear to affect the uridine phosphorylase promoter-operator region. The data obtained are in accordance with a suggestion that the cytR repressor protein normally asserts its function by preventing the positive action of cyclic AMP-cyclic AMP receptor protein complex.     

Effect of mutations for adenylate cyclase (cya) and the cyclic adenosine monophosphate receptor protein (cgp) on the gene expression of nucleoside catabolism in Escherichia coli]

The effect of cya and crp mutations on the expression of the activity of nucleoside catabolizing genes has been studied in Escherichia coli. It is found that cya and crp mutants lose their ability to grow on nucleosides as carbon sources in spite of the preservation of the basal levels of nucleoside catabolizing enzymes, found in cell-free extracts of cya and crp mutants. It is shown that cya and crp mutations completely release the influence of the regulatory gene cytR on the activity of uridine phosphorylase (udp gene) and thymidine phosphorylase (tpp gene). On this ground it is assumed that the cytR gene product acts at the level of promotors of the corresponding structural genes, causing their insensitivity to the positive action of cAMP--CRP complex. The same data concerning the effect of cya and crp mutations on cytR regulation have been reported [8], but these authors favoured the hypothesis that the cytR gene product is a repressor protein, which binds to the specific operator.     

Nucleotide sequence of the CytR regulatory gene of E. coli K-12.

We have determined the nucleotide sequence of the cytR gene, which codes for the Cyt repressor (CytR). The coding region consists of 1023 or 1029 bp. The subunits of CytR are thus predicted to consist of 341 or 343 residues. It is shown that the N-terminal segment of the polypeptide is structurally similar to the DNA-binding region of known DNA-binding proteins. In addition, there exists an exceptionally high amino acid sequence homology between CytR and the Gal repressor, indicating a common origin of evolution.     

A novel function of the cAMP-CRP complex in Escherichia coli: cAMP-CRP functions as an adaptor for the CytR repressor in the deo operon

Unlike classical bacterial repressors, the CytR repressor of Escherichia coli cannot independently regulate gene expression. Here we show that CytR binding to the deoP2 promoter relies on interaction with the master gene regulatory protein, CRP, and, furthermore, that cAMP-CRP and CytR bind co-operatively to deoP2. Using mutant promoters we show that tandem, properly spaced DNA-bound cAMP-CRP complexes are required for this co-operative binding. These data suggest that CytR forms a bridge between tandem cAMP-CRP complexes, and that cAMP-CRP functions as an adaptor for CytR. The implications of this new version of negative control in E. coli on bacterial gene expression and on combinatorial gene regulation in higher organisms are discussed.     

The role of the N terminus in Tet repressor for tet operator binding determined by a mutational analysis.

The N-terminal residues preceding the alpha-helix-turn-alpha-helix motif on the Tn10 Tet repressor protein were probed by oligonucleotide-directed deletion mutagenesis for their role in protein activity. All deletion mutants showed decreased repression in vivo, emphasizing the importance of the N terminus for tet operator binding. Only two of the mutants, TetR delta 2-23 and TetR delta 3-8 displayed a reduced intracellular protein level. The remaining deletion mutants showed either reduced binding to tet operator and inducibility by tetracycline or transdominance. We conclude that these deletions do not affect stability and overall protein structure. DNA binding activities of residue-wise increasing deletions, TetR delta 9 through TetR delta 9-13, reveal a pattern consistent with an alpha-helical structure of the affected residues. This conclusion is supported by the helical wheel projection and the hydrophobic moment profile calculated for the protein segment ranging from residues S7-V20. We propose that these residues form an amphipathic alpha-helix which packs closely against the alpha-helix-turn-alpha-helix motif and is essential for Tet repressor activity. The residues preceding this putative alpha-helix contribute to DNA binding, but no direct interactions with base pairs of tet operator were revealed in a loss of contact analysis. Individual mutation of the 4 charged residues to alanine at the N terminus shows that no single residue can account for the reduction in repression observed for the deletion mutants.