Can 1000 reviews be wrong? Actin, alpha-Catenin, and adherens junctions

Coupling between cell adhesion and the actin cytoskeleton is thought to require a stable link between the cadherin-catenin complex and actin that is mediated by alpha-catenin. In this issue of Cell, the Weis and Nelson groups call this static model into question, showing that alpha-catenin can directly regulate actin dynamics (Drees et al., 2005 and Yamada et al., 2005).     

Driving actin dynamics under the influence of alcohol

The actin cytoskeleton plays a pivotal role in regulating neuronal development and activity, and dysregulation of actin dynamics has been linked to impaired cognitive function. In this issue of Cell Rothenfluh et al. (2006) , and Offenh?user et al. (2006) show that actin dynamics can also affect the cellular and behavioral responses of flies and mice to alcohol.     

A 13-A map of the actin-scruin filament from the limulus acrosomal process [published erratum appears in J Cell Biol 1993 Dec;123(6 Pt 1):1621]

We have determined the structure of the actin-scruin filament to 13-A resolution using a combination of low-dose EM and image analysis. The three-dimensional map reveals four actin-actin contacts: two within each strand and two between strands. The conformation of the actin subunit is different from that in the Holmes et al. (1990) model as refined by Lorenz et al. (1993). In particular, subdomain II is tilted in a similar way to that seen by Orlova and Egelman (1993) in F-Mg2(+)- ADP actin filaments in the absence of Ca2+. Scruin appears to consist of two domains of approximately equal volume. Each scruin subunit cross- links the two strands in the actin filament. Domain I of scruin contacts subdomain I of actin and makes a second contact at the junction of subdomains III and IV. Domain II of scruin contacts actin at subdomains I and II of a neighboring actin subunit. The two scruin domains thus bind differently to actin.     

Identification of actin from hepatoma Morris 5123 cells

The hepatoma Morris 5123 tumor growth is accompanied by changes in actin content and polymerization (Malicka-B?aszkiewicz et al. (1995) Mat. Med. Pol., 27, 115-118; Nowak et al. (1995) J. Exp. Cancer Res. 14, 37-40). Presently actin isoforms from cytosol and cytoskeleton fractions were separated by SDS/PAGE and identified with antibodies directed against different actin isoforms. Actin isolated from the cytosol by affinity chromatography on DNase I bound to agarose shows the presence of only one protein spot on 2D gel electrophoresis corresponding to the mobility of the rabbit a skeletal muscle actin (Mr 43,000) and isoelectric point equal to 5.3. It interacts only with monoclonal anti beta actin isoform antibodies, posing the question of differential affinity of actin isoforms to DNase I.     

Autoregulation of actin synthesis requires the 3'-UTR of actin mRNA and protects cells from actin overproduction

Monomeric (G) actin was shown to be involved in inhibiting its own synthesis by an autoregulatory mechanism that includes enhanced degradation of the actin mRNA [Bershadsky et al., 1995; Lyubimova et al., 1997]. We show that the 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR) of beta-actin mRNA, but not its 5'-untranslated region, is important for this regulation. The level of full-length beta-actin mRNA in cells was reduced when actin filaments were depolymerized by treatment with latrunculin A and elevated when actin polymerization was induced by jasplakinolide. By contrast, the level of actin mRNA lacking the 3'-UTR remained unchanged when these drugs modulated the dynamics of actin assembly in the cell. Moreover, the transfection of cells with a construct encoding the autoregulation-deficient form of beta-actin mRNA led to very high levels of actin expression compared with transfection with the control actin construct and was accompanied by characteristic changes in cell morphology and the structure of the actin cytoskeleton. These results suggest that the autoregulatory mechanism working via the 3'-UTR of actin mRNA is involved in controlling the maintenance of a defined pool of actin monomers that could be necessary for the proper organization of the microfilament system and the cytoskeleton-mediated signaling.     

Cordon-bleu: a new taste in actin nucleation

Polymerization of actin filaments powers many dynamic cellular events and is directed by a small group of actin nucleators. In this issue, Ahuja et al. (2007) identify and characterize a new actin nucleator called cordon-bleu (Cobl) that may drive morphogenesis of the central nervous system during development.     

Expression of the 53 kD forked protein rescues F-actin bundle formation and mutant bristle phenotypes in Drosophila.

forked mutations affect bristle development in Drosophila pupae, resulting in short, thick, gnarled bristles in the adult. The forked proteins are components of 200-300-microm-long actin fiber bundles that are present transiently during pupal development [Petersen et al., 1994: Genetics 136:173-182]. These bundles are composed of segments of 3-10 microm long, and forked protein is localized along the actin fiber bundle segments and accumulates at the junctions connecting them longitudinally. In the forked mutants, f(36a) and f(hd), F-actin bundles are greatly reduced in number and size, and bundle segmentation is absent. The p-element, P[w(+), falter] contains a 5.3-kb fragment of the forked gene that encodes the 53-kD forked protein [Lankenau et al., 1996: Mol Cell Biol 16:3535-3544]. Expression of only the 53-kD forked protein is sufficient to rescue the actin bundle and bristle phenotypes of f(36a) and f(hd) mutant flies. The 5.3-kb forked sequence, although smaller than the 13-kb region previously shown to rescue forked mutants [Petersen et al., 1994: Genetics 136:173-182], does contain the core forked sequence that encodes actin binding and bundling domains in cultured mammalian cells [Grieshaber and Petersen, 1999: J Cell Sci 112:2203-2211]. These data show that the 53-kD forked protein is sufficient for normal bristle development and that the domains shown previously to be important for actin bundling in cell culture may be all that are required for normal actin bundle formation in developing Drosophila bristles.     

Interdependence of Endomembrane Trafficking and Actin Dynamics during Polarized Growth of Arabidopsis Pollen Tubes

During polarized growth of pollen tubes, endomembrane trafficking and actin polymerization are two critical processes that establish membrane/wall homeostasis and maintain growth polarity. Fine-tuned interactions between these two processes are therefore necessary but poorly understood. To better understand such cross talk in the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), we first established optimized concentrations of drugs that interfere with either endomembrane trafficking or the actin cytoskeleton, then examined pollen tube growth using fluorescent protein markers that label transport vesicles, endosomes, or the actin cytoskeleton. Both brefeldin A (BFA) and wortmannin disturbed the motility and structural integrity of ARA7- but not ARA6-labeled endosomes, suggesting heterogeneity of the endosomal populations. Disrupting endomembrane trafficking by BFA or wortmannin perturbed actin polymerization at the apical region but not in the longitudinal actin cables in the shank. The interference of BFA/wortmannin with actin polymerization was progressive rather than rapid, suggesting an indirect effect, possibly due to perturbed endomembrane trafficking of certain membrane-localized signaling proteins. Both the actin depolymerization drug latrunculin B and the actin stabilization drug jasplakinolide rapidly disrupted transport of secretory vesicles, but each drug caused distinct responses on different endosomal populations labeled by ARA6 or ARA7, indicating that a dynamic actin cytoskeleton was critical for some steps in endomembrane trafficking. Our results provide evidence of cross talk between endomembrane trafficking and the actin cytoskeleton in pollen tubes.Pollen tubes of flowering plants are specialized cells that deliver immotile sperm to the proximity of female gametes for successful reproduction (Johnson and Preuss, 2002). The growth of pollen tubes is both polar and directional (Hepler et al., 2001); many cellular activities contribute to such growth, the most important being the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton system, targeted exocytosis, and endocytosis (Hepler et al., 2001).Pollen tubes contain longitudinal actin cables along the shank, which are important for providing structural support and acting as tracks for the movement of large organelles (Staiger et al., 1994). The apical area of pollen tubes instead contains dynamic filamentous actin (F-actin), as shown by fluorescently labeled actin-binding proteins (Kost et al., 1999; Fu et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2002; Wilsen et al., 2006). The dynamics of F-actin are critical for the polarized growth of pollen tubes. Genetically manipulating the activities of the small GTPases ROP (Kost et al., 1999; Fu et al., 2001; Cheung et al., 2008) and Rab (de Graaf et al., 2005), or of actin-binding proteins such as profilin and formin (Staiger et al., 1994; Chen et al., 2002; Cheung and Wu, 2004), disrupted F-actin dynamics and inhibited tube growth and caused apical bulges. Application of drugs such as latrunculin B (LatB) and jasplakinolide (Jas) showed similar effects (Gibbon et al., 1999; Vidali et al., 2001; Cardenas et al., 2005; Hörmanseder et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2007).Targeted exocytosis delivers building materials for cell membranes and cell walls and therefore is critical for maintaining growth polarity and directionality of growing pollen tubes (Hepler et al., 2001). Because targeted exocytosis brings more membrane and wall materials than needed to the apex of a pollen tube, an active endocytic system exists to retrieve excess secreted materials. In addition to this nonselective bulk membrane retrieval, pollen tubes may have selective and regulated endocytic trafficking pathways. For example, experiments using charged gold particles indicated the existence of two distinct endocytic pathways in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) pollen tubes (Moscatelli et al., 2007), and other studies showed that pollen tubes are able to take in materials from the extracellular matrix (Lind et al., 1996; Goldraij et al., 2006). The axis of targeted exocytosis correlated with the direction of tube growth and it asymmetrically changed toward the new apex during tube reorientation (Camacho and Malho, 2003; de Graaf et al., 2005). Disruption of membrane trafficking altered growth trajectories (de Graaf et al., 2005). Both suggest that membrane trafficking is a critical part of polarity maintenance and reorientation.As two important cellular processes in pollen tube growth, membrane trafficking and actin polymerization are conceivably dependent on each other. For example, several studies demonstrated that dynamic actin polymerization was essential for membrane trafficking (Hörmanseder et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2008), while others explored whether membrane trafficking affected actin polymerization (de Graaf et al., 2005; Hörmanseder et al., 2005). These studies, however, were mostly done with rapidly growing pollen tubes from tobacco or lily (Lilium longiflorum). For the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), whose pollen tubes grow slower, little is known in this regard. Given a robust protocol for Arabidopsis pollen germination (Boavida and McCormick, 2007), it is now possible to investigate the interactions between these two cellular activities.In this study, we analyzed the effects of drug treatments on Arabidopsis pollen tubes expressing fluorescent protein probes for transport vesicles, endosomes, or the actin cytoskeleton. We show that perturbing actin dynamics by LatB or Jas treatments disrupted the V-shaped distribution of transport vesicles, caused aggregation, and finally dissipation of a subpopulation of endosomes, indicating that actin dynamics are critical at some steps of endomembrane trafficking. On the other hand, disturbing endomembrane trafficking with brefeldin A (BFA) or wortmannin abolished the F-actin structure at the apical region without affecting the longitudinal actin cables at the shank. These results provide evidence that endomembrane trafficking and actin dynamics interact at certain steps during polarized growth of Arabidopsis pollen tubes.     

Actin-Binding Proteins Implicated in the Formation of the Punctate Actin Foci Stimulated by the Self-Incompatibility Response in Papaver

The actin cytoskeleton is a key target for signaling networks and plays a central role in translating signals into cellular responses in eukaryotic cells. Self-incompatibility (SI) is an important mechanism responsible for preventing self-fertilization. The SI system of Papaver rhoeas pollen involves a Ca²⁺-dependent signaling network, including massive actin depolymerization as one of the earliest cellular responses, followed by the formation of large actin foci. However, no analysis of these structures, which appear to be aggregates of filamentous (F-)actin based on phalloidin staining, has been carried out to date. Here, we characterize and quantify the formation of F-actin foci in incompatible Papaver pollen tubes over time. The F-actin foci increase in size over time, and we provide evidence that their formation requires actin polymerization. Once formed, these SI-induced structures are unusually stable, being resistant to treatments with latrunculin B. Furthermore, their formation is associated with changes in the intracellular localization of two actin-binding proteins, cyclase-associated protein and actin-depolymerizing factor. Two other regulators of actin dynamics, profilin and fimbrin, do not associate with the F-actin foci. This study provides, to our knowledge, the first insights into the actin-binding proteins and mechanisms involved in the formation of these intriguing structures, which appear to be actively formed during the SI response.The ability to perceive and integrate signals into networks is essential for all eukaryotic cells. The actin cytoskeleton is a major target and integrator of signaling networks in eukaryotic cells. In plants, many extracellular stimuli lead to rapid structural changes in the actin cytoskeleton (Staiger, 2000; Hussey et al., 2006). Although many of the signaling intermediates that regulate actin dynamics are well defined in animal cells and yeast (Iden and Collard, 2008; Thomas et al., 2009), considerably less is known for plants. However, it is generally accepted that actin-binding proteins (ABPs) function as transducers of cellular stimuli into changes in cellular architecture (Hussey et al., 2006; Staiger and Blanchoin, 2006; Thomas et al., 2009). This includes three abundant monomer-binding proteins, profilin, actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF), and cyclase-associated protein (CAP), which function synergistically to stimulate actin turnover in vitro (Chaudhry et al., 2007). Bundling and cross-linking proteins, such as fimbrin, function to stabilize actin filaments into higher order structures (Kovar et al., 2000b; Thomas et al., 2009). These and other regulators of actin turnover are likely targets for signal-mediated changes in actin architecture in response to biotic and abiotic stresses.Self-incompatibility (SI) is a genetically controlled system to prevent self-fertilization in flowering plants. SI is controlled by a multiallelic S-locus; S-specific pollen rejection results from the interaction of pollen S- and pistil S-determinants that have matching alleles (Franklin-Tong, 2008). In Papaver rhoeas, the pistil S-determinants (previously called S proteins, recently renamed PrsS; Foote et al., 1994; Wheeler et al., 2009) act as ligands, interacting with the pollen S-determinant PrpS (Wheeler et al., 2009), triggering increases in calcium influx and increases in cytosol-free calcium in incompatible pollen (Franklin-Tong et al., 1993, 1997, 2002). The Ca²⁺-mediated signaling network results in rapid inhibition of incompatible pollen tube growth and triggers programmed cell death (PCD) involving several caspase-like activities (Thomas and Franklin-Tong, 2004; Bosch and Franklin-Tong, 2007).The SI response and the Ca²⁺-signaling pathway in Papaver stimulate rapid reorganization and massive depolymerization of actin filaments in incompatible pollen tubes (Geitmann et al., 2000; Snowman et al., 2002). Moreover, it has been demonstrated that changes in actin dynamics are necessary and sufficient for PCD initiation (Thomas et al., 2006). Intriguingly, there seems to be cross talk between actin and microtubule cytoskeletons in mediating PCD in pollen (Poulter et al., 2008). Thus, there is compelling evidence for signaling to the actin cytoskeleton in mediating PCD during SI (for a recent review, see Bosch et al., 2008). SI also triggers further changes to the actin cytoskeleton. Small F-actin foci are formed, and these increase in size within the first hour after SI stimulus and remain observable for at least 3 h (Geitmann et al., 2000; Snowman et al., 2002). These aggregates contain F-actin, as they stain with rhodamine phalloidin. The formation of the small actin foci and the larger F-actin structures occurs after cessation of pollen tube growth, so they are unlikely to play a role in pollen inhibition.Punctate F-actin foci are unusual structures, and there appears to be a paucity of examples of their formation in any eukaryotic cell type. Actin patches are associated with endocytosis in normally growing yeast (Pelham and Chang, 2001; Kaksonen et al., 2003; Ayscough, 2004; Young et al., 2004), and “actin nodules” are formed during filipodia formation in platelets (Calaminus et al., 2008). Actin bodies are formed when yeast cells enter the quiescent cycle (Sagot et al., 2006), and Hirano bodies are observed in animal cells and Dictyostelium undergoing stress or in the disease state (Hirano, 1994; Maselli et al., 2002). Large star-shaped actin arrays have been observed in pollen tubes growing in vivo (Lord, 1992), but their nature and function are unknown. When we first described the SI-induced structures, we avoided the terminology of patches or bodies, as it was not known whether they were either structurally or functionally comparable to any of these previously characterized actin-based structures.Studies on the SI-mediated actin responses to date have focused on the initial phase of depolymerization, and no analysis of what is involved in the formation of the large punctate actin foci has been made. Here, we show that the formation of punctate actin foci requires actin polymerization, but once formed they are unusually stable. Moreover, we find that their formation correlates with changes in the intracellular localization of two ABPs, CAP and ADF, but not with two other key regulators of actin dynamics, profilin and fimbrin.     

Profilin-Dependent Nucleation and Assembly of Actin Filaments Controls Cell Elongation in Arabidopsis

Actin filaments in plant cells are incredibly dynamic; they undergo incessant remodeling and assembly or disassembly within seconds. These dynamic events are choreographed by a plethora of actin-binding proteins, but the exact mechanisms are poorly understood. Here, we dissect the contribution of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) PROFILIN1 (PRF1), a conserved actin monomer-binding protein, to actin organization and single filament dynamics during axial cell expansion of living epidermal cells. We found that reduced PRF1 levels enhanced cell and organ growth. Surprisingly, we observed that the overall frequency of nucleation events in prf1 mutants was dramatically decreased and that a subpopulation of actin filaments that assemble at high rates was reduced. To test whether profilin cooperates with plant formin proteins to execute actin nucleation and rapid filament elongation in cells, we used a pharmacological approach. Here, we used Small Molecule Inhibitor of Formin FH2 (SMIFH2), after validating its mode of action on a plant formin in vitro, and observed a reduced nucleation frequency of actin filaments in live cells. Treatment of wild-type epidermal cells with SMIFH2 mimicked the phenotype of prf1 mutants, and the nucleation frequency in prf1-2 mutant was completely insensitive to these treatments. Our data provide compelling evidence that PRF1 coordinates the stochastic dynamic properties of actin filaments by modulating formin-mediated actin nucleation and assembly during plant cell expansion.The actin cytoskeleton provides tracks for the deposition of cell wall materials and plays important roles during many cellular processes, such as cell expansion and morphogenesis, vesicle trafficking, and the response to biotic and abiotic signals (Baskin, 2005; Smith and Oppenheimer, 2005; Szymanski and Cosgrove, 2009; Ehrhardt and Bezanilla, 2013; Rounds and Bezanilla, 2013). Plant cells respond to diverse internal and external stimuli by regulating the turnover and rearrangement of actin cytoskeleton networks in the cytoplasm (Staiger, 2000; Pleskot et al., 2013). How these actin rearrangements sense the cellular environment and what accessory proteins modulate specific aspects of remodeling remain an area of active investigation (Henty-Ridilla et al., 2013; Li et al., 2014a, 2015).Using high spatial and temporal resolution imaging afforded by variable-angle epifluorescence microscopy (VAEM; Konopka and Bednarek, 2008), we quantified the behavior of actin filaments in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) hypocotyl epidermal cells (Staiger et al., 2009). There are two types of actin filament arrays in the cortical cytoplasm of epidermal cells: bundles and single filaments. Generally, actin bundles are stable with higher pixel intensity values, whereas individual actin filaments are fainter, more ephemeral, and constantly undergo rapid assembly and disassembly through a mechanism that has been defined as “stochastic dynamics” (Staiger et al., 2009; Henty et al., 2011; Li et al., 2012, 2015). Elongating actin filaments in the cortical cytoskeleton originate from three distinct locations: the ends of preexisting actin filaments, the side of filaments or bundles, and de novo in the cytoplasm. Plant actin filaments elongate at rates of 1.6 to 3.4 μm/s, which is the fastest assembly reported in eukaryotic cells. Distinct from the mechanism of treadmilling and fast depolymerization in vitro, however, the disassembly of single actin filaments occurs predominately through prolific severing activity (Staiger et al., 2009; Smertenko et al., 2010; Henty et al., 2011). A commonly held view is that the dynamic actin network in plant cells is regulated by the activities of conserved and novel actin-binding proteins (ABPs). Through reverse-genetic approaches and state-of-the-art imaging modalities, we and others have demonstrated that several key ABPs are involved in the regulation of stochastic actin dynamic properties in a wide variety of plants and cell types (Thomas, 2012; Henty-Ridilla et al., 2013; Li et al., 2014a, 2015). Through these efforts, the field has developed a working model for the molecular mechanisms that underpin actin organization and dynamics in plant cells (Li et al., 2015).Profilin is a small (12–15 kD), conserved actin-monomer binding protein present in all eukaryotic cells (dos Remedios et al., 2003). Profilin binds to actin by forming a 1:1 complex with globular (G-)actin, suppresses spontaneous actin nucleation, and inhibits monomer addition at filament pointed ends (Blanchoin et al., 2014). The consequences of profilin activity on actin filament turnover differ based on cellular conditions and the presence of other ABPs. In vitro studies show that the profilin-actin complex associates with the barbed ends of filaments and promotes actin polymerization by lowering the critical concentration and increasing nucleotide exchange on G-actin (Pollard and Cooper, 1984; Pantaloni and Carlier, 1993). When barbed ends are occupied by capping protein, profilin acts as an actin-monomer sequestering protein. These opposing effects of profilin might be a regulatory mechanism for profilin modulation of actin dynamics in cells. In addition to actin, profilin interacts with Pro-rich proteins, as well as polyphosphoinositide lipids in vitro (Machesky et al., 1994). Formin is an ABP that mediates both actin nucleation and processive elongation using the pool of profilin-actin complexes (Blanchoin et al., 2010). The primary sequence of formin includes a Pro-rich domain, named Formin Homology1 (FH1). Evidence from fission and budding yeast shows that profilin can increase filament elongation rates by binding to the FH1 domain (Kovar et al., 2003; Moseley and Goode, 2005; Kovar, 2006). The FH1 domain of Arabidopsis FORMIN1 (AtFH1) is also reported to modulate actin nucleation and polymerization in vitro (Michelot et al., 2005). Recently, two groups reported that profilin functions as a gatekeeper during the construction of different actin networks generated by formin or ARP2/3 complex in yeast and mammalian cells (Rotty et al., 2015; Suarez et al., 2015). These studies highlight the importance of profilin regulation in coordinating the different actin arrays present in the same cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells. However, direct evidence for how profilin facilitates formin-mediated actin nucleation or barbed end elongation in cells remains to be established.Genomic sequencing and isolation of PROFILIN (PRF) cDNAs from plants reveal that profilin is encoded by a multigene family. For example, moss (Physcomitrella patens) has three isovariants (Vidali et al., 2007) and maize (Zea mays) has five (Staiger et al., 1993; Kovar et al., 2001). In Arabidopsis, at least five PRF genes have been identified (Christensen et al., 1996; Huang et al., 1996; Kandasamy et al., 2002). Studies in maize show that the biochemical properties of profilin isoforms differ in vitro (Kovar et al., 2000). Moreover, the localization of profilin isoforms reveals organ-specific expression patterns. Detection of protein levels in vivo with isovariant-specific profilin antibodies demonstrate that Arabidopsis PRF1, PRF2, and PRF3 are constitutively expressed in vegetative tissues, whereas PRF4 and PRF5 are expressed mainly in flower and pollen tissues (Christensen et al., 1996; Huang et al., 1996; Ma et al., 2005).Several genetic studies on the functions of profilin in plants have been conducted. Reduction of profilin levels in P. patens results in the inhibition of tip growth, disorganization of F-actin, and formation of actin patches (Vidali et al., 2007). Moreover, it was shown that the interaction between profilin and actin or Pro-rich ligands is critical for tip growth in moss. Arabidopsis PRF1 has been demonstrated to be involved in cell elongation, cell shape maintenance, and control of flowering time through overexpression and antisense PRF1 transgenic plants, and further, the reduction of PRF1 inhibits the growth of hypocotyls (Ramachandran et al., 2000). However, investigation of a prf1-1 mutant, which contains a T-DNA insertion in the promoter region of the PRF1 gene, indicates that cell expansion of seedlings is promoted and that protein levels of PRF1 are regulated by light (McKinney et al., 2001). Recently, Müssar et al. (2015) reported a new Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion allele, prf1-4, that shows an obvious dwarf seedling phenotype. To date, however, there has not been a critical examination of the impact of the loss of profilin on the organization and dynamics of bona-fide single actin filaments in vivo.Here, we use a combination of genetics and live-cell imaging to investigate the role of PRF1 in the control of actin dynamics and its effect on axial cell expansion. We observed a significant decrease in the overall filament nucleation frequency in prf1 mutants, which is opposite to expectations if profilin suppresses spontaneous nucleation. Through a pharmacological approach, we found that nucleation frequency in wild-type cells treated with a formin inhibitor, SMIFH2, phenocopied prf1 mutants. We also analyzed the dynamic turnover of individual filaments in prf1 mutants and observed a significant decrease in the rate of actin filament elongation and maximum length of actin filaments. Specifically, we found that PRF1 favors the growth of a subpopulation of actin filaments that elongate at rates greater than 2 μm/s and similar results were obtained in cells after SMIFH2 treatment. Our results provide compelling evidence that Arabidopsis PRF1 contributes to stochastic actin dynamics by modulating formin-mediated actin nucleation and filament elongation during axial cell expansion.     

Nucleotide exchange and rheometric studies with F-actin prepared from ATP- or ADP-monomeric actin.

It has recently been reported that polymer actin made from monomer containing ATP (ATP-actin) differed in EM appearance and rheological characteristics from polymer made from ADP-containing monomers (ADP-actin). Further, it was postulated that the ATP-actin polymer was more rigid due to storage of the energy released by ATP hydrolysis during polymerization (Janmey et al. 1990. Nature 347:95-99). Electron micrographs of our preparations of ADP-actin and ATP-actin polymers show no major differences in appearance of the filaments. Moreover, the dynamic viscosity parameters G' and G" measured for ATP-actin and ADP-actin polymers are very different from those reported by Janmey et al., in absolute value, in relative differences, and in frequency dependence. We suggest that the relatively small differences observed between ATP-actin and ADP-actin polymer rheological parameters could be due to small differences either in flexibility or, more probably, in filament lengths. We have measured nucleotide exchange on ATP-actin and ADP-actin polymers by incorporation of alpha-32P-ATP and found it to be very slow, in agreement with earlier literature reports, and in contradiction to the faster exchange rates reported by Janmey et al. This exchange rate is much too slow to cause "reversal" of ADP-actin polymer ATP-actin polymer as reported by Janmey et al. Thus our results do not support the notion that the energy of actin-bound ATP hydrolysis is trapped in and significantly modifies the actin polymer structure.     

Actin in the ciliated protozoan Climacostomum virens: purification by DNAse I affinity chromatography, electrophoretic characterization, and immunological analysis.

The anti-actin monoclonal antibody (mab) JLA20 (Lin: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78:2335-2339, 1981) labels a 43 kD protein on Western blots of Climacostomum cell extracts; this protein does not react with an anti-alpha-smooth muscle actin mab (Skalli et al.: J. Cell Biol. 103:2787-2796, 1986) nor with an anti-alpha-sarcomeric actin mab (Skalli et al.: Am. J. Pathol. 130:515-531, 1988). This protein binds to DNAse I and can be purified by DNAse I affinity chromatography. The affinity-purified actin also reacts with mab JLA20. Two-dimensional gel analysis reveals that Climacostomum actin focuses as three spots which are more basic than the mammalian actin isoforms. After addition of KCl, the affinity-purified actin polymerizes into filaments as shown by electron microscopy after negative staining.     

Nuclear actin: to polymerize or not to polymerize

The form and function of actin in the nucleus have been enigmatic for over 30 years. Recently actin has been assigned numerous functional roles in the nucleus, but its form remains a mystery. The intricate relationship between actin form and function in the cytoplasm implies that understanding the structural properties of nuclear actin is elementary to fully understanding its function. In this issue, McDonald et al. (p. 541) use fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to tackle the question of whether nuclear actin exists as monomers or polymers.     

Correlated distribution of actin, myosin, and microtubules at the leading edge of migrating Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts

The formation of lamellipodia in migrating cells involves dynamic processes that occur in a cyclic manner as the leading edge of a cell slowly advances. We used video-enhanced contrast microscopy (VEC) to monitor the motile behavior of cells to classify protrusions into the temporal stages of initial and established protrusions (Fisher et al.: Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 11:235-247, 1988), and to monitor the fixation of cells. Multiple parameter fluorescence imaging methods (DeBiasio et al.: Journal of Cell Biology 105:1613-1622, 1987; Waggoner et al.: Methods in Cell Biology, Vol. 30, Part B, pp. 449-478, 1989) were then used to determine and to map accurately the distributions of actin, myosin and microtubules in specific types of protrusions. Initial protrusions exhibited no substructure as evidenced by VEC and actin was diffusely arranged, while myosin and microtubules were absent. Newly established protrusions contained diffuse actin as well as actin in microspikes. There was a delay in the appearance of myosin into established protrusions relative to the presence of actin. Microtubules were found in established protrusions after myosin was detected, and they were oriented parallel to the direction of migration. Actin and myosin were also localized in fibers transverse to the direction of migration at the base of initial and established protrusions. Image analysis was used to quantify the orientation of actin fibers relative to the leading edge of motile cells. The combined use of VEC, multiple parameter immunofluorescence, and image analysis should have a major impact on defining complex relationships within cells.     

Transduction of the chemotactic signal to the actin cytoskeleton of Dictyostelium discoideum

Dictyostelium discoideum amebae chemotax toward folate during vegetative growth and toward extracellular cAMP during the aggregation phase that follows starvation. Stimulation of starving amebae with extracellular cAMP leads to both actin polymerization and pseudopod extension (Hall et al., 1988, J. Cell. Biochem. 37, 285-299). We have identified an actin nucleation activity (NA) from starving amebae that is regulated by cAMP receptors and controls actin polymerization (Hall et al., 1989, J. Cell Biol., in press). We show here that NA from vegetative cells is also regulated by chemotactic receptors for folate. Our studies indicate that NA is an essential effector in control of the actin cytoskeleton by chemotactic receptors. Guided by a recently proposed model for signal transduction from the cAMP receptor (Snaar-Jagalska et al., 1988, Dev. Genet. 9, 215-225), we investigated which of three signaling pathways activates the NA effector. Treatment of whole cells with a commercial pertussis toxin preparation (PT) inhibited cAMP-stimulated NA. However, endotoxin contamination of the PT appears to account for this effect. The synag7 mutation and caffeine treatment do not inhibit activation of NA by cAMP. Thus, neither activation of adenylate cyclase nor a G protein sensitive to PT treatment of whole cells is necessary for the NA response. Actin nucleation activity stimulated with folate is normal in vegetative fgdA cells. However, cAMP suppresses rather than activates NA in starving fgdA cells. This indicates that the components of the actin nucleation effector are present and that a pathway regulating the inhibitor(s) of nucleation remains functional in starving fgdA cells. The locus of the fgdA defect, a G protein implicated in phospholipase C activation, is directly or indirectly responsible for transduction of the stimulatory chemotactic signal from cAMP receptors to the nucleation effector in Dictyostelium.     

A new cytoskeletal connection for APC: linked to actin through IQGAP

Migrating cells reorganize their actin and microtubule cytoskeletons in response to external cues. In this issue of Developmental Cell, Watanabe et al. now show a molecular connection between the actin crosslinking protein IQGAP1 and the microtubule-stabilizing protein APC that impacts cells' ability to migrate into a wound.     

Sialosylcholesterol induces reorganization of astrocyte filament network

Sialosylcholesterol induces the differentiation of astrocytes with respect to their morphological appearance (Kato et al., Brain Res. 438 (1988) 277-285; Ito et al., 481 (1989) 335-343), while in a cell-free condition it depolymerizes the astrocyte cellular filaments, the glia filaments and microfilaments (Ito et al., J. Neurochem. 61 (1993) 80-84). To solve this paradox, we examined hetero-interaction between the glia filaments and microfilaments in the presence of sialosylcholesterol. Each filament was prepared in a depolymerized form in low ionic strength, and was adjusted to physiological ionic strength to prevent from repolymerization by sialosylcholesterol. When the two filament preparations in this form were mixed, repolymerization took place in spite of the presence of sialosylcholesterol. The filament formed in the mixture was found almost exclusively composed of vimentin and actin, the major component of the glia filaments and microfilaments preparation, respectively. An excess amount of vimentin over actin in the precipitate implicated that the main mechanism for the hetero-polymerization was the enhancement of vimentin polymerization by actin. To support this view, pre-polymerization of the microfilaments before mixing with the depolymerized glia filaments resulted in a marked decrease in polymerization of the glia filaments. A similar hetero-interaction was found between the purified vimentin and actin. When polymerized vimentin and actin were directly depolymerized by sialosylcholesterol and mixed, polymer formation was demonstrated between these two proteins. Electronmicroscopy indicated direct interaction of the actin filament with the vimentin filament. The results indicate that sialosylcholesterol induces reorganization of the cellular filament network, such as disorganization of vimentin and actin filaments, and provokes their hetero-interaction to form the hetero-filament. Hence, this may be one of the key mechanisms for the induction of cellular differentiation by sialocylcholesterol.     

Study of localization of the protein-synthesizing machinery along actin filament bundles.

Indirect immunofluorescent microscopy was used to study the distribution of elongation factor 2 (eEF-2) in fixed human skin diploid and mouse embryo fibroblasts. It was found earlier that some of the eEF-2 ribosomes and initiation factor 2 (eIF-2) are co-localized with a part of the actin microfilament bundles in these cells (Gavrilova et al., 1987; Shestakova et al., 1991). Here it has been shown that inhibition of protein synthesis either by inactivation of eEF-2 itself with diphtheria toxin or by inactivation of ribosomes with ricin does not abolish the distribution of eEF-2 along the actin microfilament bundles. At the same time, the disassembly of actin microfilaments by cytochalasin D results also in the disappearance of eEF-2-carrying threads. This means that the eEF-2-carrying threads do not exist per se, and that the organization of eEF-2 in visible "filaments" depends upon the integrity of the actin cytoskeleton.