Scaling properties of cell and organelle size

How size is controlled is a fundamental question in biology. In this review, we discuss the use of scaling relationships—for example, power laws of the form y ∝ xα—to provide a framework for comparison and interpretation of size measurements. Such analysis can illustrate the biological and physical principles underlying observed trends, as has been proposed for the allometric dependence of metabolic rate or limb structure on organism mass. Techniques for measuring size at smaller length-scales continue to improve, leading to more data on the control of size in cells and organelles. Size scaling of these structures is expected to influence growth patterns, functional capacity, and intracellular transport. Furthermore, organelles such as the nucleus, mitochondria, and endoplasmic reticulum show widely varying morphologies which affect their scaling properties. We provide brief summaries of these issues for individual organelles, and conclude with a discussion on how to apply this concept to better understand the mechanisms of size control in the cellular environment.     

Scaling properties of cell and organelle size

How size is controlled is a fundamental question in biology. In this review, we discuss the use of scaling relationships-for example, power-laws of the form y∝x(α)-to provide a framework for comparison and interpretation of size measurements. Such analysis can illustrate the biological and physical principles underlying observed trends, as has been proposed for the allometric dependence of metabolic rate or limb structure on organism mass. Techniques for measuring size at smaller length-scales continue to improve, leading to more data on the control of size in cells and organelles. Size scaling of these structures is expected to influence growth patterns, functional capacity and intracellular transport. Furthermore, organelles such as the nucleus, mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum show widely varying morphologies that affect their scaling properties. We provide brief summaries of these issues for individual organelles, and conclude with a discussion on how to apply this concept to better understand the mechanisms of size control in the cellular environment.     

Pattern formation in centrosome assembly

A striking but poorly explained feature of cell division is the ability to assemble and maintain organelles not bounded by membranes, from freely diffusing components in the cytosol. This process is driven by information transfer across biological scales such that interactions at the molecular scale allow pattern formation at the scale of the organelle. One important example of such an organelle is the centrosome, which is the main microtubule organising centre in the cell. Centrosomes consist of two centrioles surrounded by a cloud of proteins termed the pericentriolar material (PCM). Profound structural and proteomic transitions occur in the centrosome during specific cell cycle stages, underlying events such as centrosome maturation during mitosis, in which the PCM increases in size and microtubule nucleating capacity. Here we use recent insights into the spatio-temporal behaviour of key regulators of centrosomal maturation, including Polo-like kinase 1, CDK5RAP2 and Aurora-A, to propose a model for the assembly and maintenance of the PCM through the mobility and local interactions of its constituent proteins. We argue that PCM structure emerges as a pattern from decentralised self-organisation through a reaction-diffusion mechanism, with or without an underlying template, rather than being assembled from a central structural template alone. Self-organisation of this kind may have broad implications for the maintenance of mitotic structures, which, like the centrosome, exist stably as supramolecular assemblies on the micron scale, based on molecular interactions at the nanometer scale.     

Cell Biology of Prokaryotic Organelles

Mounting evidence in recent years has challenged the dogma that prokaryotes are simple and undefined cells devoid of an organized subcellular architecture. In fact, proteins once thought to be the purely eukaryotic inventions, including relatives of actin and tubulin control prokaryotic cell shape, DNA segregation, and cytokinesis. Similarly, compartmentalization, commonly noted as a distinguishing feature of eukaryotic cells, is also prevalent in the prokaryotic world in the form of protein-bounded and lipid-bounded organelles. In this article we highlight some of these prokaryotic organelles and discuss the current knowledge on their ultrastructure and the molecular mechanisms of their biogenesis and maintenance.The emergence of eukaryotes in a world dominated by prokaryotes is one of the defining moments in the evolution of modern day organisms. Although it is clear that the central metabolic and information processing machineries of eukaryotes and prokaryotes share a common ancestry, the origins of the complex eukaryotic cell plan remain mysterious. Eukaryotic cells are typified by the presence of intracellular organelles that compartmentalize essential biochemical reactions whereas their prokaryotic counterparts generally lack such sophisticated subspecialization of the cytoplasmic space. In most cases, this textbook categorization of eukaryotes and prokaryotes holds true. However, decades of research have shown that a number of unique and diverse organelles can be found in the prokaryotic world raising the possibility that the ability to form organelles may have existed before the divergence of eukaryotes from prokaryotes (Shively 2006).Skeptical readers might wonder if a prokaryotic structure can really be defined as an organelle. Here we categorize any compartment bounded by a biological membrane with a dedicated biochemical function as an organelle. This simple and broad definition presents cells, be they eukaryotes or prokaryotes, with a similar set of challenges that need to be addressed to successfully build an intracellular compartment. First, an organism needs to mold a cellular membrane into a desired shape and size. Next, the compartment must be populated with the proper set of proteins that carry out the activity of the organelle. Finally, the cell must ensure the proper localization, maintenance and segregation of these compartments across the cell cycle. Eukaryotic cells perform these difficult mechanistic steps using dedicated molecular pathways. Thus, if connections exist between prokaryotic and eukaryotic organelles it seems likely that relatives of these molecules may be involved in the biogenesis and maintenance of prokaryotic organelles as well.Prokaryotic organelles can be generally divided into two major groups based on the composition of the membrane layer surrounding them. First are the cellular structures bounded by a nonunit membrane such a protein shell or a lipid monolayer (Shively 2006). Well-known examples of these compartments include lipid bodies, polyhydroxy butyrate granules, carboxysomes, and gas vacuoles. The second class consists of those organelles that are surrounded by a lipid-bilayer membrane, an arrangement that is reminiscent of the canonical organelles of the eukaryotic endomembrane system. Therefore, this article is dedicated to a detailed exploration of three prokaryotic lipid-bilayer bounded organelle systems: the magnetosomes of magnetotactic bacteria, photosynthetic membranes, and the internal membrane structures of the Planctomycetes. In each case, we present the most recent findings on the ultrastructure of these organelles and highlight the molecular mechanisms that control their formation, dynamics, and segregation. We also highlight some protein-bounded compartments to present the reader with a more complete view of prokaryotic compartmentalization.     

Fluorescence-microscopy Screening and Next-generation Sequencing: Useful Tools for the Identification of Genes Involved in Organelle Integrity

This protocol describes a fluorescence microscope-based screening of Arabidopsis seedlings and describes how to map recessive mutations that alter the subcellular distribution of a specific tagged fluorescent marker in the secretory pathway. Arabidopsis is a powerful biological model for genetic studies because of its genome size, generation time, and conservation of molecular mechanisms among kingdoms. The array genotyping as an approach to map the mutation in alternative to the traditional method based on molecular markers is advantageous because it is relatively faster and may allow the mapping of several mutants in a really short time frame. This method allows the identification of proteins that can influence the integrity of any organelle in plants. Here, as an example, we propose a screen to map genes important for the integrity of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Our approach, however, can be easily extended to other plant cell organelles (for example see^1,2), and thus represents an important step toward understanding the molecular basis governing other subcellular structures.     

Protein trafficking in plant cells: Tools and markers

Eukaryotic cells consist of numerous membrane-bound organelles,which compartmentalize cellular materials to fulfil a variety of vital functions.In the post-genomic era,it is widely recognized that identification of the subcellular organelle localization and transport mechanisms of the encoded proteins are necessary for a fundamental understanding of their biological functions and the organization of cellular activity.Multiple experimental approaches are now available to determine the subcellular localizations and dynamics of proteins.In this review,we provide an overview of the current methods and organelle markers for protein subcellular localization and trafficking studies in plants,with a focus on the organelles of the endomembrane system.We also discuss the limitations of each method in terms of protein colocalization studies.     

Organelle growth control through limiting pools of cytoplasmic components

The critical importance of controlling the size and number of intracellular organelles has led to a variety of mechanisms for regulating the formation and growth of cellular structures. In this review, we explore a class of mechanisms for organelle growth control that rely primarily on the cytoplasm as a 'limiting pool' of available material. These mechanisms are based on the idea that, as organelles grow, they incorporate subunits from the cytoplasm. If this subunit pool is limited, organelle growth will lead to depletion of subunits from the cytoplasm. Free subunit concentration therefore provides a measure of the number of incorporated subunits and thus the current size of the organelle. Because organelle growth rates are typically a function of subunit concentration, cytoplasmic depletion links organelle size, free subunit concentration, and growth rates, ensuring that as the organelle grows, its rate of growth slows. Thus, a limiting cytoplasmic pool provides a powerful mechanism for size-dependent regulation of growth without recourse to active mechanisms to measure size or modulate growth rates. Variations of this general idea allow not only for size control, but also cell-size-dependent scaling of cellular structures, coordination of growth between similar structures within a cell, and the enforcement of singularity in structure formation, when only a single copy of a structure is desired. Here, we review several examples of such mechanisms in cellular processes as diverse as centriole duplication, centrosome and nuclear size control, cell polarity, and growth of flagella.     

Engineering design principles for organelle size control systems

Organelle size is an important determinant of organelle function, and for this reason cells have evolved mechanisms to control and adjust organelle size in the face of intrinsic biological fluctuations. Size control systems have been found that employ a variety of distinct mechanisms, which fall into a small number of classes. Each class represents a design principle by which artificial size controllers could be developed for synthetic biology applications.     

Subcellular Size

All of the same conceptual questions about size in organisms apply equally at the level of single cells. What determines the size, not only of the whole cell, but of all of its parts? What ensures that subcellular components are properly proportioned relative to the whole cell? How does alteration in organelle size affect biochemical function? Answering such fundamental questions requires us to understand how the size of individual organelles and other cellular structures is determined. Knowledge of organelle biogenesis and dynamics has advanced rapidly in recent years. Does this knowledge give us enough information to formulate reasonable models for organelle size control, or are we still missing something?     

The nematocyst: a molecular map of the cnidarian stinging organelle

Nematocysts or cnidocysts represent the common feature of all cnidarians. They are large organelles produced from the Golgi apparatus as a secretory product within a specialized cell, the nematocyte or cnidocyte. Nematocysts are predominantly used for prey capture and defense, but also for locomotion. In spite of large variations in size and morphology, nematocysts share a common build comprising a cylindrical capsule to which a long hollow thread is attached. The thread is inverted and coiled within the capsule and may be armed with spines in some nematocyst types. During the discharge of nematocysts following a chemical or mechanical stimulus, the thread is expelled from within the capsule matrix in a harpoon-like fashion. This process constitutes one of the fastest in biology and is accompanied by a release of toxins that are potentially harmful also for humans. The long history of research on Hydra as a model organism has been accompanied by the cellular, mechanistic and morphological analysis of its nematocyst repertoire. Although representing one of the most complex organelles of the animal kingdom, the evolutionary origin and molecular map of the nematocyst has remained largely unknown. Recent efforts in unraveling the molecular content of this fascinating organelle have revealed intriguing parallels to the extracellular matrix.     

Phospholipid Synthesis and Transport in Mammalian Cells

Membranes of mammalian subcellular organelles contain defined amounts of specific phospholipids that are required for normal functioning of proteins in the membrane. Despite the wide distribution of most phospholipid classes throughout organelle membranes, the site of synthesis of each phospholipid class is usually restricted to one organelle, commonly the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Thus, phospholipids must be transported from their sites of synthesis to the membranes of other organelles. In this article, pathways and subcellular sites of phospholipid synthesis in mammalian cells are summarized. A single, unifying mechanism does not explain the inter‐organelle transport of all phospholipids. Thus, mechanisms of phospholipid transport between organelles of mammalian cells via spontaneous membrane diffusion, via cytosolic phospholipid transfer proteins, via vesicles and via membrane contact sites are discussed. As an example of the latter mechanism, phosphatidylserine (PS) is synthesized on a region of the ER (mitochondria‐associated membranes, MAM) and decarboxylated to phosphatidylethanolamine in mitochondria. Some evidence is presented suggesting that PS import into mitochondria occurs via membrane contact sites between MAM and mitochondria. Recent studies suggest that protein complexes can form tethers that link two types of organelles thereby promoting lipid transfer. However, many questions remain about mechanisms of inter‐organelle phospholipid transport in mammalian cells.     

The control of peroxisome number and size during division and proliferation

Like other subcellular organelles, peroxisomes divide and segregate to daughter cells during cell division, but this organelle can also proliferate or be degraded in response to environmental cues. Although the mechanisms and genes involved in these processes are still under active investigation, an important player in peroxisome proliferation is a dynamin-related protein (DRP) that is recruited to the organelle membrane by a DRP receptor. Related DRPs also function in the division of mitochondria and chloroplasts. Many other proteins and signals regulate peroxisome division and proliferation, but their modes of action are still being studied.     

Evolution and diversity of the Golgi body

Often considered a defining eukaryotic feature, the Golgi body is one of the most recognizable and functionally integrated cellular organelles. It is therefore surprising that some unicellular eukaryotes do not, at first glance, appear to possess Golgi stacks. Here we review the molecular evolutionary, genomic and cell biological evidence for Golgi bodies in these organisms, with the organelle likely present in some form in all cases. This, along with the overwhelming prevalence of stacked cisternae in most eukaryotes, implies that the ancestral eukaryote possessed a stacked Golgi body, with at least eight independent instances of Golgi unstacking in our cellular history.     

Size regulation of multiple organelles competing for a limiting subunit pool

How cells regulate the size of intracellular structures and organelles is a longstanding question. Recent experiments suggest that size control of intracellular structures is achieved through the depletion of a limiting subunit pool in the cytoplasm. While the limiting pool model ensures organelle-to-cell size scaling, it does not provide a mechanism for robust size control of multiple co-existing structures. Here we develop a generalized theory for size-dependent growth of intracellular structures to demonstrate that robust size control of multiple intracellular structures, competing for a limiting subunit pool, is achieved via a negative feedback between the growth rate and the size of the individual structure. This design principle captures size maintenance of a wide variety of subcellular structures, from cytoskeletal filaments to three-dimensional organelles. We identify the feedback motifs for structure size regulation based on known molecular processes, and compare our theory to existing models of size regulation in biological assemblies. Furthermore, we show that positive feedback between structure size and growth rate can lead to bistable size distribution and spontaneous size selection.     

Extended-resolution imaging of the interaction of lipid droplets and mitochondria

Physical contacts between organelles play a pivotal role in intracellular trafficking of metabolites. Monitoring organelle interactions in living cells using fluorescence microscopy is a powerful approach to functionally assess these cellular processes. However, detailed target acquisition is typically limited due to light diffraction. Furthermore, subcellular compartments such as lipid droplets and mitochondria are highly dynamic and show significant subcellular movement. Thus, high-speed acquisition of these organelles with extended-resolution is appreciated. Here, we present an imaging informatics pipeline enabling spatial and time-resolved analysis of the dynamics and interactions of fluorescently labeled lipid droplets and mitochondria in a fibroblast cell line. The imaging concept is based on multispectral confocal laser scanning microscopy and includes high-speed resonant scanning for fast spatial acquisition of organelles. Extended-resolution is achieved by the recording of images at minimized pinhole size and by post-processing of generated data using a computational image restoration method. Computation of inter-organelle contacts is performed on basis of segmented spatial image data. We show limitations of the image restoration and segmentation part of the imaging informatics pipeline. Since both image processing methods are implemented in other related methodologies, our findings will help to identify artifacts and the false-interpretation of obtained morphometric data. As a proof-of-principle, we studied how lipid load and overexpression of PLIN5, considered to be involved in the tethering of LDs and mitochondria, affects organelle association.     

Plant cell organelle proteomics in response to abiotic stress

Proteomics is one of the finest molecular techniques extensively being used for the study of protein profiling of a given plant species experiencing stressed conditions. Plants respond to a stress by alteration in the pattern of protein expression, either by up-regulating of the existing protein pool or by the synthesizing novel proteins primarily associated with plants antioxidative defense mechanism. Improved protein extraction protocols and advance techniques for identification of novel proteins have been standardized in different plant species at both cellular and whole plant level for better understanding of abiotic stress sensing and intracellular stress signal transduction mechanisms. In contrast, an in-depth proteome study of subcellular organelles could generate much detail information about the intrinsic mechanism of stress response as it correlates the possible relationship between the protein abundance and plant stress tolerance. Although a wealth of reviews devoted to plant proteomics are available, review articles dedicated to plant cell organelle proteins response under abiotic stress are very scanty. In the present review, an attempt has been made to summarize all significant contributions related to abiotic stresses and their impacts on organelle proteomes for better understanding of plants abiotic stress tolerance mechanism at protein level. This review will not only provide new insights into the plants stress response mechanisms, which are necessary for future development of genetically engineered stress tolerant crop plants for the benefit of humankind, but will also highlight the importance of studying changes in protein abundance within the cell organelles in response to abiotic stress.     

Linking transport and translation of mRNAs with endosomes and mitochondria

In eukaryotic cells, proteins are targeted to their final subcellular locations with precise timing. A key underlying mechanism is the active transport of cognate mRNAs, which in many systems can be linked intimately to membrane trafficking. A prominent example is the long‐distance endosomal transport of mRNAs and their local translation. Here, we describe current highlights of fundamental mechanisms of the underlying transport process as well as of biological functions ranging from endosperm development in plants to fungal pathogenicity and neuronal processes. Translation of endosome‐associated mRNAs often occurs at the cytoplasmic surface of endosomes, a process that is needed for membrane‐assisted formation of heteromeric protein complexes and for accurate subcellular targeting of proteins. Importantly, endosome‐coupled translation of mRNAs encoding mitochondrial proteins, for example, seems to be particularly important for efficient organelle import and for regulating subcellular mitochondrial activity. In essence, these findings reveal a new mechanism of loading newly synthesised proteins onto endocytic membranes enabling intimate crosstalk between organelles. The novel link between endosomes and mitochondria adds an inspiring new level of complexity to trafficking and organelle biology.     

Multilevel Control of Organelle DNA Sequence Length in Plants

We have compared the length of noncoding organelle DNA spacers in a broad sample of plant species characterized by different life history traits to test hypotheses regarding the nature of the mechanisms driving changes in their size. We first demonstrate that the spacers do not evolve at random in size but have experienced directional evolutionary trends during plant diversification. We then study the relationships between spacer lengths and other molecular features and various species attributes by taking into account population genetic processes acting within cell lineages. Comparative techniques are used to test these relationships while controlling for species phylogenetic relatedness. The results indicate that spacer length depends on mode of organelle transmission, on population genetic structure, on nucleotide content, on rates of molecular evolution, and on life history traits, in conformity with predictions based on a model of intracellular competition among replicating organelle genomes. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Proteomic analysis of clathrin-coated vesicles

For more than 50 years cell biologists have embraced the concept that biochemical and enzymatic analysis of isolated subcellular fractions provides insight into the function and machineries of cellular compartments including organelles. The utility of this approach has been significantly enhanced with the advent of mass spectrometry leading to the broad application of organelle proteomics. Clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs) form at the plasma membrane where they select protein and lipid cargo for endocytic entry into cells. CCVs also form at the trans-Golgi network, where they function in protein transport from the secretory pathway to the endosomal/lysosomal system. Herein we will describe how organelle proteomics of CCVs has greatly expanded our knowledge of the machineries, mechanisms and sites of clathrin-mediated membrane trafficking.