Nitric oxide signaling in invertebrates

Nitric oxide (NO) is an unconventional neurotransmitter and neuromodulator molecule that is increasingly found to have important signaling functions in animals from nematodes to mammals. NO signaling mechanisms in the past were identified largely through experiments on mammals, after the discovery of NO's vasodilatory functions. The use of gene knock out mice has been particularly important in revealing the functions of the several isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), the enzyme that produces NO. Recent studies have revealed rich diversity in NO signaling. In addition to the well-established pathway in which NO activates guanylyl cyclase and cGMP production, redox mechanisms involving protein nitrosylation are important contributors to modulation of neurotransmitter release and reception. NO signaling studies in invertebrates are now generating a wealth of comparative information. Invertebrate NOS isoforms have been identified in insects and molluscs, and the conserved and variable amino acid sequences evaluated. Calcium-calmodulin dependence and cofactor requirements are conserved. NADPH diaphorase studies show that NOS is found in echinoderms, coelenterates, nematodes, annelids, insects, crustaceans and molluscs. Accumulating evidence reveals that NO is used as an orthograde transmitter and cotransmitter, and as a modulator of conventional transmitter release. NO appears to be used in diverse animals for certain neuronal functions, such as chemosensory signalin, learning, and development, suggesting that these NO functions have been conserved during evolution. The discovery of NO's diverse and unconventional signaling functions has stimulated a plethora of enthusiastic investigations into its uses. We can anticipate the discovery of many more interesting and some surprising NO signaling functions.     

Nitric oxide signaling in yeast

As a cellular signaling molecule, nitric oxide (NO) is widely conserved from microorganisms, such as bacteria, yeasts, and fungi, to higher eukaryotes including plants and mammals. NO is mainly produced by NO synthase (NOS) or nitrite reductase (NIR) activity. There are several NO detoxification systems, including NO dioxygenase (NOD) and S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR). NO homeostasis based on the balance between NO synthesis and degradation is important for the regulation of its physiological functions because an excess level of NO causes nitrosative stress due to the high reactivity of NO and NO-derived compounds. In yeast, NO may be involved in stress responses, but NO and its signaling have been poorly understood due to the lack of mammalian NOS orthologs in the genome. Even though the activities of NOS and NIR have been observed in yeast cells, the gene encoding NOS and the NO production mechanism catalyzed by NIR remain unclear. On the other hand, yeast cells employ NOD and GSNOR to maintain an intracellular redox balance following endogenous NO production, exogenous NO treatment, or environmental stresses. This article reviews NO metabolism (synthesis, degradation) and its regulation in yeast. The physiological roles of NO in yeast, including the oxidative stress response, are also discussed here. Such investigations into NO signaling are essential for understanding the NO-dependent genetic and physiological modulations. In addition to being responsible for the pathology and pharmacology of various degenerative diseases, NO signaling may be a potential target for the construction and engineering of industrial yeast strains.     

Nitric oxide signaling in plant-pathogen interactions

Nitric oxide (NO), first characterized as an endothelium-derived relaxation factor, is involved in diverse cellular processes including neuronal signaling, blood pressure homeostasis, and immune response. Recent studies have also revealed a role for NO as a signaling molecule in plants. As a developmental regulator, NO promotes germination, leaf extension and root growth, and delays leaf senescence and fruit maturation. Moreover, NO acts as a key signal in plant resistance to incompatible pathogens by triggering resistance-associated hypersensitive cell death. In addition, NO activates the expression of several defense genes (e.g. pathogenesis-related genes, phenylalanine ammonialyase, chalcone synthase) and could play a role in pathways leading to systemic acquired resistance.     

Nitric oxide chemistry and cellular signaling

Nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to mediate a number of different physiological functions within every major organ system. This wide variety of functional roles is made all the more remarkable when one considers that NO is a simple diatomic molecule. However, despite the simplicity of the molecule, NO possesses a wide range of chemical reactivity and multiple potential reactive targets. It is the variability of NO reactivity, which leads to its capability to control such a vast range of biological functions. In essence the functionality of NO is controlled by its chemical reactivity. In order to understand this possibility further it is necessary to consider the biologically relevant reactions of nitric oxide.     

Nitric oxide stimulates prostaglandin synthesis in cultured rabbit gastric cells

Both prostaglandins (PGs) and nitric oxide (NO) have cytoprotective and hyperemic effects in the stomach. However, the effect of NO on PG synthesis in gastric mucosal cells is unclear. We examined whether sodium nitroprusside (SNP), a releaser of NO, stimulates PG synthesis in cultured rabbit gastric mucus-producing cells. These cells did not release NO themselves. Co-incubation with SNP (2 × 10⁻⁴, 5 × 10⁻⁴, 10⁻³ M) increased PGE₂ synthesis, and SNP (10⁻³ M) increased PGI₂ synthesis in these cells. Hemoglobin, a scavenger of NO, (10⁻⁵ M) eliminated the increase in PGE₂ synthesis by SNP, but methylene blue, an inhibitor of soluble guanylate cyclase, (5 × 10⁻⁵ M) did not affect the increase in PGE₂ synthesis by SNP. 8-bromo guanosine 3′ : 5′-cyclic monophosphate (8-bromo cGMP), a cGMP analogue, (10⁻⁶, 10⁻⁵, 10⁻⁴, 10⁻³ M) did not affect PGE₂ synthesis. These findings suggest that NO increased PGE₂ and PGI₂ synthesis via a cGMP-independent pathway in cultured rabbit gastric cells.     

Nitric oxide functions in both methyl jasmonate signaling and abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells

Intracellular components in methyl jasmonate (MeJA) signaling remain largely unknown, to compare those in well-understood abscisic acid (ABA) signaling. We have reported that nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling component in MeJA-induced stomatal closure, as well as ABA-induced stomatal closure in the previous study. To gain further information about the role of NO in the guard cell signaling, NO production was examined in an ABA- and MeJA-insensitive Arabidopsis mutant, rcn1. Neither MeJA nor ABA induced NO production in rcn1 guard cells. Our data suggest that NO functions downstream of the branch point of MeJA and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.Key words: abscisic acid, Arabidopsis thaliana, guard cells, methyl jasmonate, nitric oxideStomatal pores that are formed by pairs of guard cells respond to various environmental stimuli including plant hormones. Some signal components commonly function in MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closing signals,¹ such as cytosolic alkalization, ROS generation and cytosolic free calcium ion elevation. Recently, we demonstrated that NO functions in MeJA signaling, as well as ABA signaling in guard cells.²NO production by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and nitrate reductase (NR) plays important roles in physiological processes in plants.^3,4 It has been shown that NO functions downstream of ROS production in ABA signaling in guard cells.⁵ NO mediates elevation of cytosolic free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca²⁺]_cyt), inactivation of inward-rectifying K⁺ channels and activation of S-type anion channels,⁶ which are known to be key factors in MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closure.^2,7–9It has been reported that ROS was not induced by MeJA and ABA in the MeJA- and ABA-insensitive mutant, rcn1 in which the regulatory subunit A of protein phosphatase 2A, RCN1, is impaired.^7,10 We examined NO production induced by MeJA and ABA in rcn1 guard cells (Fig. 1). NO production by MeJA and ABA was impaired in rcn1 mutant (p = 0.87 and 0.25 for MeJA and ABA, respectively) in contrast to wild type. On the other hand, the NO donor, SNP induced stomatal closure both in wild type and rcn1 mutant (data not shown). These results are consistent with our previous results, i.e., NO is involved in both MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closure and functions downstream of the branching point of MeJA and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.⁷ Our finding implies that protein phosphatase 2A might positively regulate NO levels in guard cells (Fig. 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Impairment of MeJA- and ABA-induced NO production in rcn1 guard cells. (A) Effects of MeJA (n = 10) and ABA (n = 9) on NO production in wild-type guard cells. (B) Effects of MeJA (n = 7) and ABA (n = 7) on NO production in rcn1 guard cells. The vertical scale represents the percentage of diaminofluorescein-2 diacetate (DAF-2 DA) fluorescent levels when fluorescent intensities of MeJA- or ABA-treated cells are normalized to control value taken as 100% for each experiment. Each datum was obtained from at least 30 guard cells. Error bars represent standard errors. Significance of differences between data sets was assessed by Student''s t-test analysis in this paper. We regarded differences at the level of p < 0.05 as significant.Open in a separate windowFigure 2A model of signal interaction in MeJA-induced and ABA-induced stomatal closure. Neither MeJA nor ABA induces ROS production, NO production, I_Kin and stomatal closure in rcn1 mutant. These results suggest that NO functions downstream of the branch point of MeJA signaling and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.     

Nitric oxide in marine invertebrates: a comparative perspective

Since the discovery of the biological effects of nitric oxide (NO) more than two decades ago, NO has been identified as an important physiological modulator and a messenger molecule in mammals. Parallel to these studies, evidence that has accumulated in recent years has revealed that the NO signalling pathway is spread throughout the entire phylogenetic scale, being increasingly found in lower organisms, ranging from Chordata to Mollusca. The present review attempts to provide a survey of current knowledge of the genesis and possible roles of NO and the related signalling pathway in marine invertebrates, with special emphasis on Sepia, a choice dictated by the increasing appreciation of cephalopods as most valuable model systems for studies of NO biology and the present expectation for new exciting insights into as yet little explored segments of NO biology.     

Nitric oxide elicitation for secondary metabolite production in cultured plant cells

Nitric oxide (NO) is an important signal molecule in stress responses. Accumulation of secondary metabolites often occurs in plants subjected to stresses including various elicitors or signal molecules. NO has been reported to play important roles in elicitor-induced secondary metabolite production in tissue and cell cultures of medicinal plants. Better understanding of NO role in the biosynthesis of such metabolites is very important for optimizing the commercial production of those pharmaceutically significant secondary metabolites. This paper summarizes progress made on several aspects of NO signal leading to the production of plant secondary metabolites, including various abiotic and biotic elicitors that induce NO production, elicitor-triggered NO generation cascades, the impact of NO on growth development and programmed cell death in medicinal plants, and NO-mediated regulation of the biosynthetic pathways of such metabolites. Cross-talks among NO signaling and reactive oxygen species, salicylic acid, and jasmonic acid are discussed. Some perspectives on the application of NO donors for induction of the secondary metabolite accumulation in plant cultures are also presented.     

Nitric oxide signaling in colon cancer chemoprevention

Nitric oxide (NO) is a pleiotrophic regulator, pivotal to numerous biological processes, including vasodilation, neurotransmission, and macrophage-mediated immunity. The highly reactive free radicals, produced by NO synthases (NOS) have been implicated in the modulation of carcinogenesis. Over-expression of inducible NOS (iNOS), a common phenomenon during chronic inflammatory conditions, generates sustainable amounts of NO, that its reactive intermediates are mutagenic, causing DNA damage or impairment of DNA repair, has been well established in carcinogenesis. Recent studies also implicate NO as having a key signaling molecule that regulates processes of tumorigenesis. Increased expression of iNOS has been observed in tumors of the colon, lung, oropharynx, reproductive organs, breast, and central nervous system besides its occurrence in chronic inflammatory diseases. Progression of a large majority of human and experimental colon tumors appears to progress by NO resulting from stimulation of proinflammatory cytokines, and inactivation (nitrosylation) of p53 mediated caspase activities in the tumors, whereas in some cases it associated with induction of apoptosis and tumor regression. This dichotomy is largely explained by the complexity of signaling pathways in tumor cells, that respond to NO very differently depending on its concentration. p53 mutation, functional loss, activation, and inactivation of apoptotic proteins all have been linked with NO resistance and dependence. Evidence from both in vitro and in vivo experiments support that NO and its reactive metabolite peroxynitrite stimulate COX-2 activity leading generation of tumor growth enhancing prostaglandins. Thus, NO mediated signaling can augment the tumor growth and metastasis by promoting invasive and angiogenic properties of tumor cells, which includes triggering and activation of COX-2. Thus, developing selective inhibitors of iNOS and NO-releasing agents may lead to important strategies for chemoprevention of colon cancer. Chemoprevention studies at preclinical level with several selective inhibitors of iNOS in both chemically and transgenic models of colon cancer are encouraging.     

Nitric oxide synthesis and signalling in plants

As with all organisms, plants must respond to a plethora of external environmental cues. Individual plant cells must also perceive and respond to a wide range of internal signals. It is now well-accepted that nitric oxide (NO) is a component of the repertoire of signals that a plant uses to both thrive and survive. Recent experimental data have shown, or at least implicated, the involvement of NO in reproductive processes, control of development and in the regulation of physiological responses such as stomatal closure. However, although studies concerning NO synthesis and signalling in animals are well-advanced, in plants there are still fundamental questions concerning how NO is produced and used that need to be answered. For example, there is a range of potential NO-generating enzymes in plants, but no obvious plant nitric oxide synthase (NOS) homolog has yet been identified. Some studies have shown the importance of NOS-like enzymes in mediating NO responses in plants, while other studies suggest that the enzyme nitrate reductase (NR) is more important. Still, more published work suggests the involvement of completely different enzymes in plant NO synthesis. Similarly, it is not always clear how NO mediates its responses. Although it appears that in plants, as in animals, NO can lead to an increase in the signal cGMP which leads to altered ion channel activity and gene expression, it is not understood how this actually occurs.
NO is a relatively reactive compound, and it is not always easy to study. Furthermore, its biological activity needs to be considered in conjunction with that of other compounds such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) which can have a profound effect on both its accumulation and function. In this paper, we will review the present understanding of how NO is produced in plants, how it is removed when its signal is no longer required and how it may be both perceived and acted upon.     

Nitric oxide and S-nitrosylation: excitotoxic and cell signaling mechanism

This review focuses on the important physiological messenger, nitric oxide (NO), and its role in N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) excitotoxicity. NO has been shown to be a key mediator of voltage-gated Ca(+2) transmembrane proteins. It remains unclear whether NO is implicated during hypoxia, or ischemic/reperfusion injuries as a neuroprotective or neurodegenerative factor. Excitotoxicity results from the excessive stimulation of excitatory glutamate receptors within the CNS. This review maintains that the feed-forward pathway precipitated by oxidative stress is the discriminating factor in the neuroprotective or neurodegenerative actions of NO.     

Nitric oxide signaling during myocardial angiogenesis

Ischemic heart disease develops as a consequence of coronary atherosclerotic lesion formation. Coronary collateral vessels and microvascular angiogenesis develop as an adaptive response to myocardial ischemia, which ameliorates the function of the damaged heart. Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from pre-existing vascular bed, is of paramount importance in the maintenance of vascular integrity both in the repair process of damaged tissue and in the formation of collateral vessels in response to tissue ischemia. Angiogenesis is modulated by a multitude of cytokines/chemokines and growth factors. In this regard, angiogenesis cannot be viewed as a single process. It is likely that different mediators are involved in different phases of angiogenesis. Vascular endothelial cells (ECs) produce nitric oxide (NO), an endothelium-derived labile molecule, which maintains vascular homeostasis and thereby prevents vascular atherosclerotic changes. In patients with ischemic heart disease, the release of endothelium-derived NO is decreased, which plays an important role in the atherosclerotic disease progression. In recent years, endothelium-derived NO has been shown to modulate angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. In this review, we summarize recent progress in the field of the NO-mediated regulation of postnatal angiogenesis, particularly in response to myocardial ischemia.     

Nitric oxide signaling during myocardial angiogenesis

Ischemic heart disease develops as a consequence of coronary atherosclerotic lesion formation. Coronary collateral vessels and microvascular angiogenesis develop as an adaptive response to myocardial ischemia, which ameliorates the function of the damaged heart. Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from pre-existing vascular bed, is of paramount importance in the maintenance of vascular integrity both in the repair process of damaged tissue and in the formation of collateral vessels in response to tissue ischemia. Angiogenesis is modulated by a multitude of cytokines/chemokines and growth factors. In this regard, angiogenesis cannot be viewed as a single process. It is likely that different mediators are involved in different phases of angiogenesis. Vascular endothelial cells (ECs) produce nitric oxide (NO), an endothelium-derived labile molecule, which maintains vascular homeostasis and thereby prevents vascular atherosclerotic changes. In patients with ischemic heart disease, the release of endothelium-derived NO is decreased, which plays an important role in the atherosclerotic disease progression. In recent years, endothelium-derived NO has been shown to modulate angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. In this review, we summarize recent progress in the field of the NO-mediated regulation of postnatal angiogenesis, particularly in response to myocardial ischemia. (Mol Cell Biochem 264: 25–34, 2004)     

Nitric oxide function in plant abiotic stress

Abiotic stress is one of the main threats affecting crop growth and production. An understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underpin plant responses against environmental insults will be crucial to help guide the rational design of crop plants to counter these challenges. A key feature during abiotic stress is the production of nitric oxide (NO), an important concentration dependent, redox‐related signalling molecule. NO can directly or indirectly interact with a wide range of targets leading to the modulation of protein function and the reprogramming of gene expression. The transfer of NO bioactivity can occur through a variety of potential mechanisms but chief among these is S‐nitrosylation, a prototypic, redox‐based, post‐translational modification. However, little is known about this pivotal molecular amendment in the regulation of abiotic stress signalling. Here, we describe the emerging knowledge concerning the function of NO and S‐nitrosylation during plant responses to abiotic stress.     

一氧化氮与激发子诱导的植物抗病防卫反应

来源于真菌或植物细胞壁的激发子可以诱导植物的抗性反应。一系列的信号分子,如一氧化氮、活性氧、茉莉酸、水杨酸、乙烯等都参与了激发子诱导的植物抗性反应。它们在介导激发子刺激诱发胞内抗性反应的过程中起着重要的作用。本文介绍了激发子的种类,并简述了激发了受体以及植物细胞对激发子刺激的感受与传递;重点介绍了一氧化氮在激发子诱导植物抗性反应过程中的作用,以及它与其他信号分子之间相互关系的研究进展。     

Nitric oxide signaling in aluminum stress in plants

Nitric oxide (NO) is a ubiquitous signal molecule involved in multiple plant responses to environmental stress. In the recent years, the regulating role of NO on heavy metal toxicity in plants is realized increasingly, but knowledge of NO in alleviating aluminum (Al) toxicity is quite limited. In this article, NO homeostasis between its biosynthesis and elimination in plants is presented. Some genes involved in NO/Al network and their expressions are also introduced. Furthermore, the role of NO in Al toxicity and the functions in Al tolerance are discussed. It is proposed that Al toxicity may disrupt NO homeostasis, leading to endogenous NO concentration being lower than required for root elongation in plants. There are many evidences that pointed out that the exogenous NO treatments improve Al tolerance in plants through activating antioxidative capacity to eliminate reactive oxygen species. Most of the work with respect to NO regulating pathways and functions still has to be done in the future.     

Nitric oxide modulates Gi-protein expression and adenylyl cyclase signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells

We have previously shown that treatment of rats with the nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor N6-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester for 4 weeks resulted in the augmentation of blood pressure and enhanced levels of Gialpha proteins. The present studies were undertaken to investigate if NO can modulate the expression of Gi proteins and associated adenylyl cyclase signaling. A10 vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) and primary cultured cells from aorta of Sprague-Dawley rats were used for these studies. The cells were treated with S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) or sodium nitroprusside (SNP) for 24 h and the expression of Gialpha proteins was determined by immunobloting techniques. Adenylyl cyclase activity was determined by measuring [32P]cAMP formation for [alpha-32P]ATP. Treatment of cells with SNAP (100 microM) or SNP (0.5 mM) decreased the expression of Gialpha-2 and Gialpha-3 by about 25-40% without affecting the levels of Gsalpha proteins. The decreased expression of Gialpha proteins was reflected in decreased Gi functions (receptor-independent and -dependent) as demonstrated by decreased or attenuated forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity by GTPgammaS and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity by angiotensin II and C-ANP4-23, a ring-deleted analog of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) that specifically interacts with natriuretic peptide receptor-C (NPR-C) in SNAP-treated cells. The SNAP-induced decreased expression of Gialpha-2 and Gialpha-3 proteins was not blocked by 1H[1,2,4]oxadiazole[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one, an inhibitor of soluble guanylyl cyclase, or KT5823, an inhibitor of protein kinase G, but was restored toward control levels by uric acid, a scavenger of peroxynitrite and Mn(111)tetralis (benzoic acid porphyrin) MnTBAP, a peroxynitrite scavenger and a superoxide dismutase mimetic agent that inhibits the production of peroxynitrite, suggesting that NO-mediated decreased expression of Gialpha protein was cGMP-independent and may be attributed to increased levels of peroxynitrite. In addition, Gsalpha-mediated stimulation of adenylyl cyclase by GTPgammaS, isoproterenol, and forskolin was significantly augmented in SNAP-treated cells. These results indicate that NO decreased the expression of Gialpha protein and associated functions in VSMC by cGMP-independent mechanisms. From these studies, it can be suggested that NO-induced decreased levels of Gi proteins and resultant increased levels of cAMP may be an additional mechanism through which NO regulates blood pressure.