Features of molecular recognition of intrinsically disordered proteins via coupled folding and binding

The sequence–structure–function paradigm of proteins has been revolutionized by the discovery of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) or intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). In contrast to traditional ordered proteins, IDPs/IDRs are unstructured under physiological conditions. The absence of well‐defined three‐dimensional structures in the free state of IDPs/IDRs is fundamental to their function. Folding upon binding is an important mode of molecular recognition for IDPs/IDRs. While great efforts have been devoted to investigating the complex structures and binding kinetics and affinities, our knowledge on the binding mechanisms of IDPs/IDRs remains very limited. Here, we review recent advances on the binding mechanisms of IDPs/IDRs. The structures and kinetic parameters of IDPs/IDRs can vary greatly, and the binding mechanisms can be highly dependent on the structural properties of IDPs/IDRs. IDPs/IDRs can employ various combinations of conformational selection and induced fit in a binding process, which can be templated by the target and/or encoded by the IDP/IDR. Further studies should provide deeper insights into the molecular recognition of IDPs/IDRs and enable the rational design of IDP/IDR binding mechanisms in the future.     

Uncoupled binding and folding of immune signaling-related intrinsically disordered proteins

The classical protein structure-function paradigm has been challenged by the emergence of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), the proteins that do not adopt well-defined three-dimensional structures under physiological conditions. This development was accompanied by the introduction of a “coupled binding and folding” paradigm that suggests folding of IDPs upon binding to their partners. However, our recent studies challenge this general view by revealing a novel, previously unrecognized phenomenon – uncoupled binding and folding. This biologically important mechanism is characteristic of members of a new family of IDPs involved in immune signaling and underlies their unusual properties including: (1) specific homodimerization, (2) the lack of folding upon binding to a well-folded protein, another IDP molecule, or to lipid bilayer membranes, and (3) the “scissors-cut paradox”. The third phenomenon occurs in diverse IDP interactions and suggests that properties of IDP fragments are not necessarily additive in the context of the entire protein. The “no disorder-to-order transition” type of binding is distinct from known IDP interactions and is characterized by an unprecedented observation of the lack of chemical shift and peak intensity changes in multidimensional NMR spectra, a fingerprint of proteins, upon complex formation. Here, I focus on those interactions of IDPs with diverse biological partners where the binding phase driven by electrostatic interactions is not be necessarily followed by the hydrophobic folding phase. I also review new multidisciplinary knowledge about immune signaling-related IDPs and show how it expands our understanding of cell function with multiple applications in biology and medicine.     

Molecular dynamics simulation of intrinsically disordered proteins

Intrinsically disordered proteins are biomolecules that do not have a definite 3D structure; therefore, their dynamical simulation cannot start from a known list of atomistic positions, such as a Protein Data Bank file. We describe a method to start a computer simulation of these proteins. The first step of the procedure is the creation of a multi-rod configuration of the molecule, derived from its primary sequence. This structure is dynamically evolved in vacuo until its gyration radius reaches the experimental average value; at this point solvent molecules, in explicit or implicit implementation, are added to the protein and a regular molecular dynamics simulation follows. We have applied this procedure to the simulation of tau, one of the largest totally disordered proteins.     

Smoothing molecular interactions: the "kinetic buffer" effect of intrinsically disordered proteins

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) widely participate in molecular recognition and signaling processes in cells by interacting with other molecules. Compared with ordered proteins, IDPs usually possess stronger intermolecular interactions in binding. As a result, the interface structure of IDPs in complexes is distinct from that of ordered-protein complexes, and this difference may have essential effect on the response to various perturbations in a cell. In this study, we examined the perturbations of intermolecular interactions and temperature on the coupled folding and binding processes of pKID to KIX domains by performing molecular dynamics simulations. By comparing a series of virtual pKID systems with various degree of disorder, we found that the complex stability and the binding kinetics of the disordered systems were less sensitive to the perturbations than the ordered systems. The origin of the lower response sensitivity of IDPs was attributed to their higher flexibility in the complex interface, which was further supported by an analysis on protein complex structures. On the basis of our simulations and results from the literature, we speculate IDPs may not only interact with their biological partners with high specificity and low affinity but also may be resistant to the perturbations in the environment and transmit signals fast and smooth. We proposed to name it the "kinetic buffer" effect.     

Alzheimer's-disease-associated conformation of intrinsically disordered tau protein studied by intrinsically disordered protein liquid-phase competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Tau protein, the major constituent of paired helical filaments in Alzheimer's disease, belongs to the intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). IDPs are an emerging group in the protein kingdom characterized by the absence of a rigid three-dimensional structure. Disordered proteins usually acquire a "functional fold" upon binding to their interaction partner(s). This property of IDPs implies the need for innovative approaches to measure their binding affinity. We have mapped and measured the Alzheimer's-disease-associated epitope on intrinsically disordered tau protein with a novel two-step sandwich competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). This approach allowed us to determine the binding affinity of disordered tau protein in liquid phase without any disturbance to the competitive equilibrium and without any need for covalent or noncovalent modification of tau protein. Furthermore, the global fitting method, used for the reconstruction of tau binding curves, significantly improved the assay readout. The proposed novel competitive ELISA allowed us to determine the changes in the standard Gibbs energy of binding, thus enabling measurement of tau protein conformation in the core of paired helical filaments. IDP competitive ELISA results showed, for the first time, that the tau protein C terminus of the Alzheimer's-disease-derived paired helical filaments core subunit adopts beta-turn type I' fold and is accessible from solution.     

Binding cavities and druggability of intrinsically disordered proteins

To assess the potential of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) as drug design targets, we have analyzed the ligand-binding cavities of two datasets of IDPs (containing 37 and 16 entries, respectively) and compared their properties with those of conventional ordered (folded) proteins. IDPs were predicted to possess more binding cavity than ordered proteins at similar length, supporting the proposed advantage of IDPs economizing genome and protein resources. The cavity number has a wide distribution within each conformation ensemble for IDPs. The geometries of the cavities of IDPs differ from the cavities of ordered proteins, for example, the cavities of IDPs have larger surface areas and volumes, and are more likely to be composed of a single segment. The druggability of the cavities was examined, and the average druggable probability is estimated to be 9% for IDPs, which is almost twice that for ordered proteins (5%). Some IDPs with druggable cavities that are associated with diseases are listed. The optimism versus obstacles for drug design for IDPs is also briefly discussed.     

Segmental isotope-labeling of the intrinsically disordered protein PQBP1

Polyglutamine tract-binding protein 1 (PQBP1) is an intrinsically disordered protein abundantly expressed in the brain. Mutations in the PQBP1 gene are causative for X-linked mental retardation disorders. Here, we investigated the structure of the C-terminal segment within the context of full-length PQBP1. We produced a segmentally isotope-labeled PQBP1 composed of a non-labeled segment (residues 1–219; N-segment) and a ¹³C/¹⁵N-labeled segment (residues 220–265; C-segment). Our results demonstrate that the segmental isotope-labeling combined with NMR spectroscopy is useful for detecting a very weak intra-molecular interaction in an intrinsically disordered protein.     

Exploring the binding diversity of intrinsically disordered proteins involved in one‐to‐many binding

Molecular recognition features (MoRFs) are intrinsically disordered protein regions that bind to partners via disorder‐to‐order transitions. In one‐to‐many binding, a single MoRF binds to two or more different partners individually. MoRF‐based one‐to‐many protein–protein interaction (PPI) examples were collected from the Protein Data Bank, yielding 23 MoRFs bound to 2–9 partners, with all pairs of same‐MoRF partners having less than 25% sequence identity. Of these, 8 MoRFs were bound to 2–9 partners having completely different folds, whereas 15 MoRFs were bound to 2–5 partners having the same folds but with low sequence identities. For both types of partner variation, backbone and side chain torsion angle rotations were used to bring about the conformational changes needed to enable close fits between a single MoRF and distinct partners. Alternative splicing events (ASEs) and posttranslational modifications (PTMs) were also found to contribute to distinct partner binding. Because ASEs and PTMs both commonly occur in disordered regions, and because both ASEs and PTMs are often tissue‐specific, these data suggest that MoRFs, ASEs, and PTMs may collaborate to alter PPI networks in different cell types. These data enlarge the set of carefully studied MoRFs that use inherent flexibility and that also use ASE‐based and/or PTM‐based surface modifications to enable the same disordered segment to selectively associate with two or more partners. The small number of residues involved in MoRFs and in their modifications by ASEs or PTMs may simplify the evolvability of signaling network diversity.     

Advantages of proteins being disordered

The past decade has witnessed great advances in our understanding of protein structure‐function relationships in terms of the ubiquitous existence of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). The structural disorder of IDPs/IDRs enables them to play essential functions that are complementary to those of ordered proteins. In addition, IDPs/IDRs are persistent in evolution. Therefore, they are expected to possess some advantages over ordered proteins. In this review, we summarize and survey nine possible advantages of IDPs/IDRs: economizing genome/protein resources, overcoming steric restrictions in binding, achieving high specificity with low affinity, increasing binding rate, facilitating posttranslational modifications, enabling flexible linkers, preventing aggregation, providing resistance to non‐native conditions, and allowing compatibility with more available sequences. Some potential advantages of IDPs/IDRs are not well understood and require both experimental and theoretical approaches to decipher. The connection with protein design is also briefly discussed.     

Context-dependent resistance to proteolysis of intrinsically disordered proteins

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), also known as intrinsically unstructured proteins (IUPs), lack a well-defined 3D structure in vitro and, in some cases, also in vivo. Here, we discuss the question of proteolytic sensitivity of IDPs, with a view to better explaining their in vivo characteristics. After an initial assessment of the status of IDPs in vivo, we briefly survey the intracellular proteolytic systems. Subsequently, we discuss the evidence for IDPs being inherently sensitive to proteolysis. Such sensitivity would not, however, result in enhanced degradation if the protease-sensitive sites were sequestered. Accordingly, IDP access to and degradation by the proteasome, the major proteolytic complex within eukaryotic cells, are discussed in detail. The emerging picture appears to be that IDPs are inherently sensitive to proteasomal degradation along the lines of the "degradation by default" model. However, available data sets of intracellular protein half-lives suggest that intrinsic disorder does not imply a significantly shorter half-life. We assess the power of available systemic half-life measurements, but also discuss possible mechanisms that could protect IDPs from intracellular degradation. Finally, we discuss the relevance of the proteolytic sensitivity of IDPs to their function and evolution.     

Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins

Intrinsically unstructured proteins (IUPs) are devoid of extensive structural order but often display signs of local and limited residual structure. To explain their effective functioning, we reasoned that such residual structure can be crucial in their interactions with their structured partner(s) in a way that preformed structural elements presage their final conformational state. To check this assumption, a database of 24 IUPs with known 3D structures in the bound state has been assembled and the distribution of secondary structure elements and backbone torsion angles have been analysed. The high proportion of residues in coil conformation and with phi, psi angles in the disallowed regions of the Ramachandran map compared to the reference set of globular proteins shows that IUPs are not fully ordered even in their bound form. To probe the effect of partner proteins on IUP folding, inherent conformational preferences of IUP sequences have been assessed by secondary structure predictions using the GOR, ALB and PROF algorithms. The accuracy of predicting secondary structure elements of IUPs is similar to that of their partner proteins and is significantly higher than the corresponding values for random sequences. We propose that strong conformational preferences mark regions in IUPs (mostly helices), which correspond to their final structural state, while regions with weak conformational preferences represent flexible linkers between them. In our interpretation, preformed elements could serve as initial contact points, the binding of which facilitates the reeling of the flexible regions onto the template. This finding implies that IUPs draw a functional advantage from preformed structural elements, as they enable their facile, kinetically and energetically less demanding, interaction with their physiological partner.     

The Hsp90 molecular chaperone governs client proteins by targeting intrinsically disordered regions

1. Download : Download high-res image (149KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Systematic analysis of tropomodulin/tropomyosin interactions uncovers fine-tuned binding specificity of intrinsically disordered proteins

An intriguing regulatory mechanism is the ability of some proteins to recognize their binding partners in an isoform‐specific manner. In this study we undertook a systematic analysis of the specificity of the tropomodulin (Tmod) interaction with tropomyosin (TM) to show that affinities of different Tmod isoforms to TM are isoform‐dependent. Intrinsic disorder predictions, alignment of sequences, and circular dichroism were utilized to establish a structural basis for these isoform‐specific interactions. The affinity of model peptides derived from the N‐terminus of different TM isoforms to protein fragments that correspond to the two TM‐binding sites of different Tmod isoforms were analyzed. Several residues were determined to be responsible for the isoform‐dependent differences in affinity. We suggest that changing a set of residues rather than a single residue is needed to alter the binding affinity of one isoform to mimic the affinity of another isoform. The general intrinsic disorder predictor, PONDR® VLXT, was shown to be a useful tool for analyzing regions involved in isoform‐specific binding and for predicting the residues important for isoform differences in binding. Knowing the residues responsible for isoform‐specific affinity creates a tool suitable for studying the influence of Tmod/TM interactions on sarcomere assembly in muscle cells or actin dynamics in non‐muscle cells. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Temporary secondary structures in tau,an intrinsically disordered protein

The tau protein belongs to the category of intrinsically disordered proteins, which in their native state do not have an average stable structure and fluctuate between many conformations. In its physiological state, tau helps nucleating and stabilising the microtubules in the axons of the neurons. On the other hand, the same tau is involved in the development of Alzheimer disease, when it aggregates in paired helical filaments forming fibrils, which form insoluble tangles. The beginning of the pathological aggregation of tau has been attributed to a local transition of protein portions from random coil to a β-sheet. These structures would very likely be transient; therefore, we performed a molecular dynamics simulation of tau to gather information on the existence of segments of tau endowed with a secondary structure. We combined the results of our simulation with small-angle X-ray scattering experimental data to extract from the dynamics a set of most probable conformations of tau. The analysis of these conformations highlights the presence of transient secondary structures such as turns, β-bridges, β-sheets and α-helices. It also shows that a large segment of the N-terminal region is found near the repeats domain in a globular-like shape.