3D domain swapping: as domains continue to swap

Three-dimensional (3D) domain swapping creates a bond between two or more protein molecules as they exchange their identical domains. Since the term '3D domain swapping' was first used to describe the dimeric structure of diphtheria toxin, the database of domain-swapped proteins has greatly expanded. Analyses of the now about 40 structurally characterized cases of domain-swapped proteins reveal that most swapped domains are at either the N or C terminus and that the swapped domains are diverse in their primary and secondary structures. In addition to tabulating domain-swapped proteins, we describe in detail several examples of 3D domain swapping which show the swapping of more than one domain in a protein, the structural evidence for 3D domain swapping in amyloid proteins, and the flexibility of hinge loops. We also discuss the physiological relevance of 3D domain swapping and a possible mechanism for 3D domain swapping. The present state of knowledge leads us to suggest that 3D domain swapping can occur under appropriate conditions in any protein with an unconstrained terminus. As domains continue to swap, this review attempts not only a summary of the known domain-swapped proteins, but also a framework for understanding future findings of 3D domain swapping.     

Exploring the Roles of Proline in Three-Dimensional Domain Swapping from Structure Analysis and Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Three-dimensional (3D) domain swapping is a mechanism to form protein oligomers. It has been proposed that several factors, including proline residues in the hinge region, may affect the occurrence of 3D domain swapping. Although introducing prolines into the hinge region has been found to promote domain swapping for some proteins, the opposite effect has also been observed in several studies. So far, how proline affects 3D domain swapping remains elusive. In this work, based on a large set of 3D domain-swapped structures, we performed a systematic analysis to explore the correlation between the presence of proline in the hinge region and the occurrence of 3D domain swapping. We further analyzed the conformations of proline and pre-proline residues to investigate the roles of proline in 3D domain swapping. We found that more than 40% of the domain-swapped structures contained proline residues in the hinge region. Unexpectedly, conformational transitions of proline residues were rarely observed upon domain swapping. Our analyses showed that hinge regions containing proline residues preferred more extended conformations, which may be beneficial for the occurrence of domain swapping by facilitating opening of the exchanged segments.     

Three-dimensional domain swapping in the protein structure space

Since the proposal of three-dimensional (3D) domain swapping, many 3D domain-swapped structures have been reported. However, when compared with the vast protein structure space, it is still unclear whether 3D domain swapping is a general mechanism for protein assembly. Here, we investigated this possibility by constructing a dataset consisting of more than 500 domain-swapped structures. The domain-swapped structures were mapped into the protein structure space. We found that about 10% of protein folds and 5% of protein families contain domain-swapped structures. When comparing the domain-swapped structures in a family/superfamily, we found that proteins within a family/superfamily can swap in different ways. Interface analysis revealed that the hinge loops contributed more than half of the open interface in 70% of bona fide domain-swapped dimers, indicating that the hinge loops play an important role in stabilizing the domain-swapped conformations. Our study supports the suggestion that domain swapping is a general property of all proteins and will facilitate further understanding the mechanism of 3D domain swapping.     

Thermal aggregation of ribonuclease A. A contribution to the understanding of the role of 3D domain swapping in protein aggregation

By lyophilizing RNase A from 40% acetic acid solutions, two dimeric aggregates, the "minor" and "major" dimers (named here N-dimer and C-dimer, respectively), form by 3D domain swapping at a ratio of 1:4. Trimeric and tetrameric aggregates are also obtained. The two dimers and the higher oligomers also form without a lyophilization step. By keeping RNase A dissolved at a high concentration (generally 200 mg/ml) in various media at temperatures ranging from 23 to 70 degrees C for times varying from a few minutes to 2 h, various oligomers, in particular the two dimeric conformers, formed in quite different amounts, often inverting their relative quantities depending on the more or less severe unfolding conditions. When unfolding mainly concerned the N terminus of the protein, richer in hydrophilic residues, the N-dimer, formed by 3D domain swapping of the N-terminal alpha-helix of each monomer, prevailed over the C-dimer. Under more vigorous denaturing conditions, where also the C terminus of RNase A, richer in hydrophobic amino acids, unfolded, the C-dimer, formed by 3D domain swapping of the C-terminal beta-strand, prevailed over the other, possibly because of the induction to aggregation promoted by the hydrophobic residues present in the C termini of the two monomers.     

3D domain swapping, protein oligomerization, and amyloid formation

In 3D domain swapping, first described by Eisenberg, a structural element of a monomeric protein is replaced by the same element from another subunit. This process requires partial unfolding of the closed monomers that is then followed by adhesion and reconstruction of the original fold but from elements contributed by different subunits. If the interactions are reciprocal, a closed-ended dimer will be formed, but the same phenomenon has been suggested as a mechanism for the formation of open-ended polymers as well, such as those believed to exist in amyloid fibrils. There has been a rapid progress in the study of 3D domain swapping. Oligomers higher than dimers have been found, the monomer-dimer equilibrium could be controlled by mutations in the hinge element of the chain, a single protein has been shown to form more than one domain-swapped structure, and recently, the possibility of simultaneous exchange of two structural domains by a single molecule has been demonstrated. This last discovery has an important bearing on the possibility that 3D domain swapping might be indeed an amyloidogenic mechanism. Along the same lines is the discovery that a protein of proven amyloidogenic properties, human cystatin C, is capable of 3D domain swapping that leads to oligomerization. The structure of domain-swapped human cystatin C dimers explains why a naturally occurring mutant of this protein has a much higher propensity for aggregation, and also suggests how this same mechanism of 3D domain swapping could lead to an open-ended polymer that would be consistent with the cross-beta structure, which is believed to be at the heart of the molecular architecture of amyloid fibrils.     

3D domain swapping: a mechanism for oligomer assembly.

3D domain swapping is a mechanism for forming oligomeric proteins from their monomers. In 3D domain swapping, one domain of a monomeric protein is replaced by the same domain from an identical protein chain. The result is an intertwined dimer or higher oligomer, with one domain of each subunit replaced by the identical domain from another subunit. The swapped "domain" can be as large as an entire tertiary globular domain, or as small as an alpha-helix or a strand of a beta-sheet. Examples of 3D domain swapping are reviewed that suggest domain swapping can serve as a mechanism for functional interconversion between monomers and oligomers, and that domain swapping may serve as a mechanism for evolution of some oligomeric proteins. Domain-swapped proteins present examples of a single protein chain folding into two distinct structures.     

A domain-swapped RNase A dimer with implications for amyloid formation

Bovine pancreatic ribonuclease (RNase A) forms two types of dimers (a major and a minor component) upon concentration in mild acid. These two dimers exhibit different biophysical and biochemical properties. Earlier we reported that the minor dimer forms by swapping its N-terminal alpha-helix with that of an identical molecule. Here we find that the major dimer forms by swapping its C-terminal beta-strand, thus revealing the first example of three-dimensional (3D) domain swapping taking place in different parts of the same protein. This feature permits RNase A to form tightly bonded higher oligomers. The hinge loop of the major dimer, connecting the swapped beta-strand to the protein core, resembles a short segment of the polar zipper proposed by Perutz and suggests a model for aggregate formation by 3D domain swapping with a polar zipper.     

The crystal structure of Aspergillus fumigatus cyclophilin reveals 3D domain swapping of a central element

The crystal structure of Aspergillus fumigatus cyclophilin (Asp f 11) was solved by the multiwavelength anomalous dispersion method and was refined to a resolution of 1.85 A with R and R(free) values of 18.9% and 21.4%, respectively. Many cyclophilin structures have been solved to date, all showing the same monomeric conformation. In contrast, the structure of A. fumigatus cyclophilin reveals dimerization by 3D domain swapping and represents one of the first proteins with a swapped central domain. The domain-swapped element consists of two beta strands and a subsequent loop carrying a conserved tryptophan. The tryptophan binds into the active site, inactivating cis-trans isomerization. This might be a means of biological regulation. The two hinge loops leave the protein prone to misfolding. In this context, alternative forms of 3D domain swapping that can lead to N- or C-terminally swapped dimers, oligomers, and aggregates are discussed.     

3dswap-pred: prediction of 3D domain swapping from protein sequence using Random Forest approach

3D domain swapping is a protein structural phenomenon that mediates the formation of the higher order oligomers in a variety of proteins with different structural and functional properties. 3D domain swapping is associated with a variety of biological functions ranging from oligomerization to pathological conformational diseases. 3D domain swapping is realised subsequent to structure determination where the protein is observed in the swapped conformation in the oligomeric state. This is a limiting step to understand this important structural phenomenon in a large scale from the growing sequence data. A new machine learning approach, 3dswap-pred, has been developed for the prediction of 3D domain swapping in protein structures from mere sequence data using the Random Forest approach. 3Dswap-pred is implemented using a positive sequence dataset derived from literature based structural curation of 297 structures. A negative sequence dataset is obtained from 462 SCOP domains using a new sequence data mining approach and a set of 126 sequencederived features. Statistical validation using an independent dataset of 68 positive sequences and 313 negative sequences revealed that 3dswap-pred achieved an accuracy of 63.8%. A webserver is also implemented using the 3dswap-pred Random Forest model. The server is available from the URL: http://caps.ncbs.res.in/3dswap-pred.     

RNase A oligomerization through 3D domain swapping is favoured by a residue located far from the swapping domains

Bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A forms 3D domain-swapped oligomers by lyophilization from 40% acetic acid solutions or if subjected to various thermally-induced denaturation procedures.Considering that the intrinsic swapping propensity of bovine seminal RNase, the only member of the pancreatic-type RNase super-family that is dimeric in nature, is decreased from 70 to 30% if Arg80 is substituted by Ser (the corresponding residue in native RNase A), we introduced the opposite mutation in position 80 of the pancreatic enzyme. Our aim was to detect if the RNase A tendency to aggregate through domain swapping could increase.Aggregation of the S80R-RNase A mutant was induced either through the ‘classic’ acetic acid lyophilization, or through a thermally-induced method. The results indicate that the S80R mutant aggregates to a higher extent than the native protein, and that the increase occurs especially through N-terminal swapping.Additional investigations on the dimeric and multimeric species formed indicate that the S80R mutation increases their stability against regression to monomer, and does not significantly change their structural and functional features.     

Characterization of high-order diphtheria toxin oligomers

In 3D domain swapping, a domain of a protein breaks its noncovalent bonds with the protein core and its place is taken by the identical domain of another molecule, creating a strongly bound dimer or higher order oligomer. For some proteins, including diphtheria toxin, 3D domain swapping may affect protein function. To explore the molecular basis of 3D domain swapping in a well-characterized protein system, domain-swapped oligomers of diphtheria toxin were produced by freezing and thawing under a variety conditions, including in various salts and buffers, and at various temperatures. Reaction yields were followed by high-performance size-exclusion chromatography. The traditional low pH pulse produced by freeze-thawing in mixed sodium phosphate buffer induces the oligomerization of DT, but the addition of alkali chloride salts was found to increase the yield in the order of Li(+) > Na(+) > K(+). Unexpectedly, oligomers also formed when DT was frozen and thawed in the presence of 1 M LiCl alone. Slower freezing and thawing of the mixture led to the production of more and larger oligomers. DT oligomers were also produced by exposure to acidic buffers, and were found by electron microscopy to adopt both linear and cyclized forms in a wide distribution of sizes. Upon the basis of these results, the model for the production of DT oligomers by freezing and thawing was expanded to include a salt-mediated pathway. We present a mechanism for the formation of high-order DT oligomers by acidification that takes into account domain swapping and hydrophobic interactions.     

Swapping of three-dimensional domains as a molecular mechanism of dimerization of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

It has been shown recently that many proteins undergo oligomerization through exchange of structural elements. That process, termed a 3D domain swapping, is the replacement of a portion of the tertiary structure of a protein with an identical piece from a second polypeptide chain. When the exchange is reciprocated, domain-swapped dimers embrace with the exchange of elements of secondary structure or domains; however, if the exchange is not reciprocated but propagated along multiple polynucleotide chains, higher-order assemblies may form. In this paper we discuss swapping as a general mechanism of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases dimerization, specifically plant methionyl-tRNA synthetase.     

An extended hydrophobic core induces EF-hand swapping

The structure of calbindin D(9k) with two substitutions was determined by X-ray crystallography at 1.8-A resolution. Unlike wild-type calbindin D(9k), which is a monomeric protein with two EF-hands, the structure of the mutated calbindin D(9k) reveals an intertwined dimer. In the dimer, two EF-hands of the monomers have exchanged places, and thus a 3D domain-swapped dimer has been formed. EF-hand I of molecule A is packed toward EF-hand II of molecule B and vice versa. The formation of a hydrophobic cluster, in a region linking the EF-hands, promotes the conversion of monomers to 3D domain-swapped dimers. We propose a mechanism by which domain swapping takes place via the apo form of calbindin D(9k). Once formed, the calbindin D(9k) dimers are remarkably stable, as with even larger misfolded aggregates like amyloids. Thus calbindin D(9k) dimers cannot be converted to monomers by dilution. However, heating can be used for conversion, indicating high energy barriers separating monomers from dimers.     

Propensity for C-terminal domain swapping correlates with increased regional flexibility in the C-terminus of RNase A

Domain swapping is a type of oligomerization in which monomeric proteins exchange a structural element, resulting in oligomers whose subunits recapitulate the native, monomeric fold. It has been implicated as a potential mechanism for protein aggregation, which provides a strong impetus to understand the structural determinants and folding mechanisms that trigger domain swapping. Bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A (RNase A) is a well-studied protein known to domain swap under extreme conditions, such as lyophilization from acetic acid. The major domain-swapped dimer form of RNase A exchanges a β-strand at its C-terminus to form a C-terminal domain-swapped dimer. To study the mechanism by which C-terminal swapping occurs, we used a variant of RNase A containing a P114G mutation that readily domain swaps under physiological conditions. Using NMR and hydrogen-deuterium exchange, we find that the P114G variant has decreased protection from hydrogen exchange compared to the wild-type protein near the C-terminal hinge region. Our results suggest that domain swapping occurs via a local high-energy fluctuation at the C-terminus.     

Topological determinants of protein domain swapping

Protein domain swapping has been repeatedly observed in a variety of proteins and is believed to result from destabilization due to mutations or changes in environment. Based on results from our studies and others, we propose that structures of the domain-swapped proteins are mainly determined by their native topologies. We performed molecular dynamics simulations of seven different proteins, known to undergo domain swapping experimentally, under mildly denaturing conditions and found in all cases that the domain-swapped structures can be recapitulated by using protein topology in a simple protein model. Our studies further indicated that, in many cases, domain swapping occurs at positions around which the protein tends to unfold prior to complete unfolding. This, in turn, enabled prediction of protein structural elements that are responsible for domain swapping. In particular, two distinct domain-swapped dimer conformations of the focal adhesion targeting domain of focal adhesion kinase were predicted computationally and were supported experimentally by data obtained from NMR analyses.     

Dimerization of Crh by reversible 3D domain swapping induces structural adjustments to its monomeric homologue Hpr

The crystal structure of the regulatory protein Crh from Bacillus subtilis was solved at 1.8A resolution and showed an intertwined dimer formed by N-terminal beta1-strand swapping of two monomers. Comparison with the monomeric NMR structure of Crh revealed a domain swap induced conformational rearrangement of the putative interaction site with the repressor CcpA. The resulting conformation closely resembles that observed for the monomeric Crh homologue HPr, indicating that the Crh dimer is the active form binding to CcpA. An analogous dimer of HPr can be constructed without domain swapping, suggesting that HPr may dimerize upon binding to CcpA. Our data suggest that reversible 3D domain swapping of Crh might be an efficient regulatory mechanism to modulate its activity.     

Domain swapping in N-truncated human cystatin C

Human cystatin C (HCC) inhibits papain-like cysteine proteases by a binding epitope composed of two beta-hairpin loops and the N-terminal segment. HCC is found in all body fluids and is present at a particularly high level in the cerebrospinal fluid. Oligomerization of HCC leads to amyloid deposits in brain arteries at advanced age but this pathological process is greatly accelerated with a naturally occurring Leu68Gln variant, resulting in fatal amyloidosis in early adult life. When proteins are extracted from human cystatin C amyloid deposits, an N-terminally truncated cystatin C (THCC) is found, lacking the first ten amino acid residues of the native sequence. It has been shown that the cerebrospinal fluid may cause this N-terminal truncation, possibly because of disintegration of the leucocytes normally present in this fluid, and the release of leucocyte proteolytic enzymes. HCC is the first disease-causing amyloidogenic protein for which oligomerization via 3D domain swapping has been observed. The aggregates arise in the crystallization buffer and have the form of 2-fold symmetric dimers in which a long alpha-helix of one molecule, flanked by two adjacent beta-strands, has replaced an identical domain of the other molecule, and vice versa. Consistent with a conformational change at one of the beta-hairpin loops of the binding epitope, the dimers (and also any other oligomers, including amyloid aggregates) are inactive as papain inhibitors. Here, we report the structure of N-truncated HCC, the dominant form of cystatin C in amyloid deposits. Although the protein crystallized under conditions that are drastically different from those for the full-length protein, the structure reveals dimerization by the same act of domain swapping. However, the new crystal structure is composed of four independent HCC dimers, none of which has the exact 2-fold symmetry of the full-length dimer. While the four dimers have the same overall topology, the exact relation between the individual domains shows a variability that reflects the flexibility at the dimer-specific open interface, which in the case of 3D domain-swapped HCC consists of beta-interactions between the open hinge loops and results in an unusually long intermolecular beta-sheet. The dimers are engaged in further quaternary interactions resulting in spherical, closed octameric assemblies that are identical to that present in the crystal of the full-length protein. The octamers interact via hydrophobic patches formed on the surface of the domain-swapped dimers as well as by extending the dimer beta-sheet through intermolecular contacts.     

Evidences for the unfolding mechanism of three‐dimensional domain swapping

The full or partial unfolding of proteins is widely believed to play an essential role in three‐dimensional domain swapping. However, there is little research that has rigorously evaluated the association between domain swapping and protein folding/unfolding. Here, we examined a kinetic model in which domain swapping occurred via the denatured state produced by the complete unfolding of proteins. The relationships between swapping kinetics and folding/unfolding thermodynamics were established, which were further adopted as criteria to show that the proposed mechanism dominates in three representative proteins: Cyanovirin‐N (CV‐N), the C‐terminal domain of SARS‐CoV main protease (M^pro‐C), and a single mutant of oxidized thioredoxin (Trx_W28A^ox).     

Domain swapping reveals complement control protein modules critical for imparting cofactor and decay-accelerating activities in vaccinia virus complement control protein

Vaccinia virus encodes a structural and functional homolog of human complement regulators named vaccinia virus complement control protein (VCP). This four-complement control protein domain containing secretory protein is known to inhibit complement activation by supporting the factor I-mediated inactivation of complement proteins, proteolytically cleaved form of C3 (C3b) and proteolytically cleaved form of C4 (C4b) (termed cofactor activity), and by accelerating the irreversible decay of the classical and to a limited extent of the alternative pathway C3 convertases (termed decay-accelerating activity [DAA]). In this study, we have mapped the VCP domains important for its cofactor activity and DAA by swapping its individual domains with those of human decay-accelerating factor (CD55) and membrane cofactor protein (MCP; CD46). Our data indicate the following: 1) swapping of VCP domain 2 or 3, but not 1, with homologous domains of decay-accelerating factor results in loss in its C3b and C4b cofactor activities; 2) swapping of VCP domain 1, but not 2, 3, or 4 with corresponding domains of MCP results in abrogation in its classical pathway DAA; and 3) swapping of VCP domain 1, 2, or 3, but not 4, with homologous MCP domains have marked effect on its alternative pathway DAA. These functional data together with binding studies with C3b and C4b suggest that in VCP, domains 2 and 3 provide binding surface for factor I interaction, whereas domain 1 mediates dissociation of C2a and Bb from the classical and alternative pathway C3 convertases, respectively.     

Oligomerization of ribonuclease A under reducing conditions

By lyophilization from 40% acetic acid solutions, bovine ribonuclease A forms well characterized, three-dimensional domain-swapped oligomers: dimers, trimers, tetramers, and higher order multimers. Each oligomeric species consists of at least two conformers. Identical oligomers also form by thermally-inducing the oligomerization of highly concentrated RNase A dissolved in fluids endowed with various denaturing power. Now, our question is: which might the influence of a reducing agent be on RNase A oligomerization, i.e., of conditions that decrease the stability of the protein and increase the mobility of its swapping domains? To address this question, we carried out experiments of RNase A oligomerization in the presence of increasing concentrations of dithiothreitol (DTT) under the two experimental conditions mentioned above. Results indicate that RNase A oligomers similar to those previously known form anyhow, but with a change of their relative proportions. The amounts of dimers and trimers decrease by increasing the concentration of DTT, while the yields of two tetramers remarkably increase. Moreover, in the presence of DTT RNase A forms labile and probably unstructured aggregates that can possibly drive the protein towards precipitation when the reducing agent's concentration increases. Taken together, these results point out once again (i) the important role of the 3D domain swapping mechanism in protein oligomerization, and (ii) the importance of the native structure of RNase A (and of proteins in general) in preventing an uncontrolled aggregation and precipitation in a reducing and highly crowded environment like that existing in a living cell.