American society of maxillofacial surgeons outcome study: preoperative and postoperative neurodevelopmental findings in single-suture craniosynostosis

The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the neurodevelopmental effects associated with single-suture, nonsyndromic craniosynostosis before and after surgery. Children diagnosed with single-suture craniosynostosis were evaluated by a psychologist using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (BSID-II) within 2 months before and again 1 year after surgical correction. The BSID-II is a widely used measure of infant cognitive and motor development. The scale consists of three parts, the Mental Developmental Index (MDI), the Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI), and the Behavior Rating Scale. The MDI and PDI yield age-standard scores (mean, 100; SD, 16). The children ranged in age from 2.5 to 10 months at the time of the craniofacial reconstruction (average age, 5.9 months). Metopic synostosis was diagnosed in 23 percent, sagittal synostosis in 45 percent, and unilateral coronal synostosis in 32 percent of patients. Twenty-two patients were evaluated preoperatively, of whom 15 patients were evaluated postoperatively. Mean baseline BSID-II scores revealed a mild delay in mental and motor scores (MDI, 82.3; PDI, 79.5). Mean postoperative BSID-II scores still revealed a mild delay in mental scores but significantly improved motor scores (MDI, 79.3; PDI, 89.3). Of the 15 children, four (27 percent) had BSID-II evaluations that were in the average range for all scales and nine infants (60 percent) had at least one MDI or PDI score in the significantly delayed range (<70). Among children with single-suture nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, mean Bayley scores indicated mild baseline deficits in both mental and motor scores. After surgical treatment, improvement was seen in the motor scale. It appears from this sample that neurodevelopmental abnormalities may be present in children with single-suture synostosis, and some may persist at 1 year of follow-up.     

Plasticity of the endocranial base in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis

Limited in vivo data exist on the dysmorphology of the cranial base in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Few studies have documented the effect of calvarial surgery for synostosis on endocranial morphology. Previous work has suggested that the dysmorphology of the endocranial base is diagnostically specific for metopic, sagittal, and unicoronal sutures. The purpose of this study was to further evaluate the endocranial base in infants with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis by testing the hypothesis that the dysmorphology is, to some degree, a secondary deformation rather than a primary malformation. Three questions were addressed: (1) Can individuals reliably identify affected suture-specific endocranial-base morphology using standard templates? (2) Does calvarial surgery in infancy for craniosynostosis affect the perception of endocranial-base morphology? and (3) Does calvarial surgery in infancy for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis normalize the endocranial base?In this study, three-dimensional volumetric reconstructions from archived computed tomography digital data were processed using the ANALYZE imaging software. Dysmorphology was assessed by nine independent, blinded skilled observers who reviewed two separate sets of images of endocranial bases. Both sets contained images from the same patients: one set contained preoperative images, and the other contained images of the endocranial base 1 year after calvarial surgery. Observers were asked to sort each set into four suture-specific diagnostic groups: normal, unicoronal, metopic, and sagittal. Each set contained 10 patients with unicoronal synostosis, 10 with metopic synostosis, 10 with sagittal synostosis, and four normal patients. Seventy-eight percent of the total number of preoperative images were correctly sorted into the suture-specific diagnostic group, whereas only 55 percent of the total number of postoperative images were correctly matched. With regard to the individual sutures, the results were as follows (data are presented as preoperative accuracy versus postoperative accuracy): metopic, 76 percent versus 44 percent; sagittal, 58 percent versus 34 percent; unicoronal, 100 percent versus 79 percent; and normal, 83 percent versus 72 percent. Although 36 of 306 total images per group (12 percent) actually represented normal patients, the observers called 72 of 306 normal (24 percent) in the preoperative set versus 110 of 306 normal (36 percent) in the postoperative set. In conclusion, (1) the endocranial dysmorphology of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis is recognizably specific to the affected suture; (2) calvarial surgery for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis normalizes the endocranial base qualitatively with regard to the diminished ability of raters to identify the primary pathology; and (3) the documented postoperative changes in endocranial base morphology after calvarial surgery for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis in infancy indicates that a major component of that dysmorphology is a secondary deformity rather than a primary malformation.     

Maxillary volume growth in craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis, and in particular, craniofacial dysostosis, exhibits abnormalities of the nasomaxillary complex in form, position, and development. The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the volumetric maxillary abnormality in patients at the time of initial diagnosis of craniosynostosis and to make comparisons with a "normal" reference range for maxillary volumes throughout childhood. The technique of segmentation was applied to preoperative computed tomographic head scans obtained in 31 children (14 boys, 17 girls), between 1 and 34 months of age (mean, 11.06 months), who underwent cranial expansion surgery for craniosynostosis affecting the coronal suture complex. Maxillary volumes were plotted against age for the first 3 years of life and were compared with a healthy population. There was no statistical difference between the two sexes for mean maxillary volume. The mean maxillary volumes for the entire group were statistically smaller than the norm (p = 0.046, linear regression with age as a covariable), but there was no statistical difference among the four different groups of coronal synostosis (unilateral coronal, nonsyndromic bilateral coronal, nonsyndromic complex pansynostosis, syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis) (p = 0.407, one-way analysis of variance). On graphic data analysis, the maxillary volume was smaller than the norm in craniosynostotic children who presented in the first few months of life. However, by 7 months of age in nonsyndromic bilateral coronal synostosis and by 17 months of age in syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis, the maxillary volumes had increased toward the norm. This implies that the effect of the craniosynostotic process on the midface structures is present from birth and parallels the effect on the cranial vault sutures.     

Unilateral and bilateral expression of a quantitative trait: asymmetry and symmetry in coronal craniosynostosis

Bilateral symmetry in vertebrates is imperfect and mild asymmetries are found in normal growth and development. However, abnormal development is often characterized by strong asymmetries. Coronal craniosynostosis, defined here as consisting of premature suture closure and a characteristic skull shape, is a complex trait. The premature fusion of the coronal suture can occur unilaterally associated with skull asymmetry (anterior plagiocephaly) or bilaterally associated with a symmetric but brachycephalic skull. We investigated the relationship between coronal craniosynostosis and skull bilateral symmetry. Three-dimensional landmark coordinates were recorded on preoperative computed tomography images of children diagnosed with coronal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (N = 40) and that of unaffected individuals (N = 20) and analyzed by geometric morphometrics. Our results showed that the fusion pattern of the coronal suture is similar across individuals and types of coronal craniosynostosis. Shape analysis showed that skulls of bilateral coronal craniosynostosis (BCS) and unaffected individuals display low degrees of asymmetry, whereas right and left unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (UCS) skulls are asymmetric and mirror images of one another. When premature fusion of the coronal suture (without taking into account cranial dysmorphology) is scored as a qualitative trait, the expected relationship between trait frequency and trait unilateral expression (i.e. negative correlation) is confirmed. Overall, we interpret our results as evidence that the same biological processes operate on the two sides in BCS skulls and on the affected side in UCS skulls, and that coronal craniosynostosis is a quantitative trait exhibiting a phenotypic continuum with BCS displaying more intense shape changes than UCS.     

Positional changes of the frontoparietal ossification centers in perinatal craniosynostotic rabbits.

It has been suggested that craniosynostosis is caused by abnormally located ossification centers (i.e., bony tubers) in the developing skull prior to suture formation [Mathijssen et al., 1996, 1997]. The present study was designed to test this hypothesis in a rabbit model of human familial, nonsyndromic coronal suture (CS) synostosis. Calvariae were taken from 99 New Zealand White rabbit perinates (55 normal controls, 15 with delayed-onset CS synostosis, and 29 with bilateral or unilateral CS synostosis), ranging in age from 23 to 34 days postconception (synostosis occurs at approximately 23 days in this model). Frontoparietal, interfrontal, and interparietal ossification center distances were obtained using a Wild microscope with camera lucida attachment and a 2-D computer digitization technique. Linear regression analysis was used to compare age-related changes in the perinatal ossification centers among groups. Results revealed that frontoparietal ossification center regression line slopes had similar start points (24-day intercepts) with significantly (P < 0.05) diverging slopes over time. Normal and delayed-onset ossification center distance increased more rapidly than in synostosed perinates. No significant (P > 0.05) differences were noted in regression line slopes among groups for interparietal or interfrontal ossification center distances. Results demonstrated that, in synostosed perinates, frontoparietal ossification center location was similar to normals around the time of synostosis and became displaced later. These findings suggest that ossification center (i.e., bony tuber) displacement seen in infants with craniosynostosis is probably a secondary and compensatory, postsynostotic change and not a primary causal factor of synostosis in this rabbit model.     

Correction of unilateral coronal synostosis leads to resolution of mandibular asymmetry in rabbits

Mandibular dysmorphology in unilateral coronal synostosis has been recognized clinically. In patients with unilateral coronal synostosis, the chin point deviates away from the affected side. To investigate whether this mandibular asymmetry resolves after correction of unilateral coronal synostosis, familial nonsyndromic rabbits were used. Rabbits with unilateral coronal synostosis that underwent "correction" with resection of the affected suture were compared with "uncorrected" rabbits with unilateral coronal synostosis and normal, wild-type rabbits (n = 36; three equal groups of 12). Serial lateral cephalograms obtained at 10, 25, 42, and 84 days showed no asymmetries in wild-type rabbits and progressive asymmetries in the ramal height and mandibular length in uncorrected unilateral coronal synostosis rabbits. However, in corrected unilateral coronal synostosis rabbits, existing asymmetries at 10 and 25 days improved by 42 days and were not seen by maturity, at 84 days. In dry, mature, mandibular specimens, wild-type rabbits showed equal side-to-side measurements and uncorrected unilateral coronal synostosis rabbits showed the following on the affected side: longer ramal height (15 percent), shorter ramal width (13 percent), longer body height (10 percent), and shorter body width (13 percent). By contrast, the corrected unilateral coronal synostosis specimens showed no side-to-side differences in 10 of 11. There were no asymmetries in condylar shape or condylar volume in any of the three groups. Cranial base measurements showed asymmetries of the uncorrected unilateral coronal synostosis specimens that were consistent with an anteriorly positioned glenoid fossa on the affected side. However, only one of 11 corrected unilateral coronal synostosis specimens showed similar cranial base asymmetries. The data showed that mandibular asymmetries in nonsyndromic, familial rabbits with unilateral coronal synostosis are progressive with growth but improve after correction of synostosis.     

Intracranial pressure changes in craniosynostotic rabbits

Cranial vault and brain deformities in individuals with craniosynostosis are thought to result, in part, from changes in intracranial pressure, but clinical findings are still inconclusive. The present study describes intracranial pressure changes in a rabbit model with naturally occurring, uncorrected coronal suture synostosis. Longitudinal and cross-sectional intracranial pressure data were collected from 241 New Zealand White rabbits, divided into four groups: normal controls (n = 81); rabbits with delayed-onset coronal suture synostosis (n = 78); rabbits with early-onset unilateral coronal suture synostosis (n = 32); and rabbits with early-onset bilateral coronal suture synostosis (n = 50). Epidural intracranial pressure measurements were obtained at 10, 25, 42, and 84 days of age using a NeuroMonitor microsensor transducer. Normal rabbits and rabbits with delayed-onset coronal suture and early-onset unilateral coronal suture synostosis showed a similar oscillating pattern of age-related changes in normal and head-down intracranial pressure from 10 to 84 days of age. In contrast, rabbits with early-onset bilateral coronal suture synostosis showed markedly elevated normal and head-down intracranial pressure levels from 10 to 25 days and showed a different pattern through 84 days. Results from one-way analysis of variance revealed significant (p < 0.01) group differences only at 25 days of age. Rabbits with early-onset bilateral coronal suture synostosis had significantly (p < 0.05) greater normal and head-down intracranial pressure (by 42 percent) than the other three groups. These results showed differing intracranial pressure compensations in rabbits with uncorrected multiple-suture synostosis compared with normal rabbits or rabbits with uncorrected single-suture synostosis, possibly through progressive cerebral atrophy and decreased intracranial volume, abnormal intracranial vascular patterns and blood volume, and/or differing cranial vault compensatory changes.     

Unilateral fusion of the frontosphenoidal suture: a rare cause of synostotic frontal plagiocephaly

Unilateral coronal synostosis is the common appellation for premature, one-sided fusion of the frontoparietal suture-the most common cause of synostotic frontal plagiocephaly. However, frontal asymmetry can also result from isolated fusion across the anterior cranial base without involvement of the frontoparietal suture. This article describes three patients with localized synostosis of the frontosphenoidal suture, the medial extension of the coronal ring. Two patients were initially misdiagnosed as having unilateral coronal synostosis and the other as having deformational frontal plagiocephaly. The patients had variable frontal flattening, with depression and recession of the ipsilateral orbital rim. The nasal root was midline or slightly deviated to the contralateral side. The sagittal position of the ipsilateral malar eminence was slightly retruded in one patient and symmetric in the other two. The auricular position was symmetric in the sagittal plane for all patients. In all three patients, computed tomography examination demonstrated a patent frontoparietal suture and fusion of the frontosphenoidal suture (basilar hemicoronal ring). Two patients had involvement of contiguous sutures: one had fusion extending to the sphenoethmoidal suture and the other's involved part of the sphenozygomatic suture. The sagittal suture was midline in all patients. In summary, synostotic frontal plagiocephaly denotes a relatively broad phenotypic spectrum that includes unilateral coronal synostosis and more isolated fusions in the basilar coronal ring. The physical findings resulting from frontosphenoidal synostosis are unique, yet careful evaluation will minimize confusion with other causes of asymmetric frontal flattening. Proper diagnosis necessitates awareness of this uncommon entity and requires focused computed tomographic assessment.     

Clinical characteristics of patients with unicoronal synostosis and mutations of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3: a preliminary report.

Clinical teaching dictates that isolated unicoronal synostosis is sporadic in occurrence and is possibly related to intrauterine constraint. Despite this, isolated reports document a familial occurrence. It has previously been recognized that there may be a familial pattern of inheritance. Recently, mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) have been implicated in several syndromic craniosynostoses. At the authors' institution, mutations in FGFR3, located at chromosome 4p16, have been found to cause coronal synostosis. Two cases of unicoronal synostosis were found to have the same Pro250Arg missense mutation in FGFR3. This finding suggested that all patients with a diagnosis of unicoronal synostosis be screened for the FGFR3 mutation. Between January and December of 1996, patients with a diagnosis of plagiocephaly at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia were evaluated for the FGFR3 mutation. Thirty-seven patients with unicoronal synostosis had mutational studies. Two additional patients were known to have the FGFR3 mutation at the onset of the study. Of the 37 patients screened, four were found to have the FGFR3 mutation, for a total of six patients with both unicoronal synostosis and the FGFR3 mutation. All patients with unicoronal synostosis were evaluated for facial dysmorphology and operative outcome. The six patients with the FGFR3 mutation had more severe cranial dysmorphology and were more likely to need surgical revision than those without the FGFR3 mutation. The occurrence of the FGFR3 mutation among patients with unicoronal synostosis provides evidence for a genetic basis of certain forms of plagiocephaly. The clinical, radiologic, and molecular findings will be an important addition to the surgical management and counseling of patients with unicoronal synostosis.     

Management of craniosynostosis

Learning Objectives: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Review the etiopathogenesis of craniosynostosis and craniofacial anomalies. 2. Develop a basic understanding of the clinical manifestations and diagnosis of craniofacial anomalies. 3. Describe the surgical principles of managing craniosynostosis and craniofacial anomalies.Craniosynostosis, or the premature closure of calvarial sutures, results in deformed calvaria at birth. Although the etiology of craniosynostosis is currently unknown, animal experiments and a recent interest in molecular biology point toward interplay between the dura and the underlying brain. This interaction occurs by means of a local alteration in the expression of transforming growth factor, MSX2, fibroblast growth factor receptor, and TWIST. The fused suture restricts growth of the calvaria, thus leading to a characteristic deformation, each associated with a different type of craniosynostosis. Uncorrected craniosynostosis leads to a continuing progression of the deformity, and in some cases, an elevation of intracranial pressure. Clinical examination should include not only an examination of the skull but also a general examination to rule out the craniofacial syndromes that accompany craniosynostosis. Because deformational plagiocephaly, or plagiocephaly without synostosis, occurs secondary to sleeping in the supine position during the early perinatal period, the physician should be aware of this abnormality. Treatment for deformational plagiocephaly is conservative when compared with treatment for craniosynostosis, which requires surgery. Appropriate investigations should include genetic screening, radiologic examination with a computerized tomographic scan, and neurodevelopmental analysis. Surgical intervention should be performed during infancy, preferably in the first 6 months of postnatal life, to prevent the further progression of the deformity and possible complications associated with increased intracranial pressure. The principles of surgical intervention are not only to excise the fused suture but also to attempt to normalize the calvarial shape. Long-term follow-up is critical to determine the effect of the surgical outcome.     

Anthropometric study of synostotic frontal plagiocephaly: before and after fronto-orbital advancement with correction of nasal angulation

Surgical correction of synostotic frontal plagiocephaly (unilateral coronal synostosis) focuses on the asymmetry of the forehead and orbits. However, there is controversy regarding whether nasal angulation should be addressed during primary fronto-orbital advancement in infancy. This prospective study was undertaken to answer that question. Preoperative and postoperative anthropometric measurements were obtained for 19 infants with nonsyndromic synostotic frontal plagiocephaly. The measurements included nasal angulation, nasion-to-endocanthion distance, nasion-to-exocanthion distance, and exocanthion-to-tragion distance. All patients underwent bilateral parallelogrammatic fronto-orbital correction. Closing wedge nasal ostectomy was performed for group I (n = 14) and was not performed for group II (n = 5). The average age at the time of follow-up assessments was 3 years 8 months (range, 1 to 14 years) in group I and 5 years 5 months (range, 2 to 15 years) in group II. A statistically significant change was observed for patients who underwent primary correction of nasal angulation; the change correlated with improved naso-orbital symmetry, as judged with nasion-to-endocanthion and nasion-to-exocanthion measurements (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). Group I patients exhibited an average preoperative nasal angulation of 9.15 +/- 0.8 degrees that decreased to 3.1 +/- 0.6 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.01). Group II patients exhibited an average preoperative nasal angulation of 6.4 +/- 0.7 degrees that was unchanged postoperatively at 7.2 +/- 1 degrees. The improvement in nasal angulation in group I was particularly striking because the patients in group II exhibited, on average, a lesser degree of preoperative nasal deviation (p < 0.01). This prospective comparison of fronto-orbital correction of synostotic frontal plagiocephaly with and without nasal correction confirmed an earlier study and demonstrated that angulation of the nasal pyramid does not self-correct within 5 years after traditional bilateral fronto-orbital repair. Closing wedge nasal ostectomy results in improved nasal angulation and naso-orbital symmetry, without evidence of distortion or inhibition of nasal growth.     

Prenatal exposure to fluconazole: an identifiable dysmorphic phenotype

BACKGROUND: Fluconazole is a triazole antifungal used to treat mycotic infections. Fluconazole is reported to act as a teratogen when used continuously at a dosage of 400-800 mg daily. Fluconazole embryopathy was previously reported in 4 cases. The common features that were also seen in the current case include multiple synostosis (including craniosynostosis and digital synostosis), congenital heart defects, skeletal anomalies, and recognizable dysmorphic facial features. CASE: We report the case of a 9-month-old male born to a 30-year-old woman following a 37-week pregnancy. The pregnancy was complicated by maternal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and multiple drug exposures, including fluconazole (400 mg/day) until the fifth month and then from 6 months to term, efavirenz, nevirapine, methadone, dapsone, pentamidine, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. At birth the infant had seizures related to neonatal abstinence syndrome and was noted to have multiple congenital anomalies. On examination at age 9 months, he had craniosynostosis secondary to coronal and lambdoidal suture closures, shallow orbital region, hypoplastic supraorbital ridges, hypertelorism, and mild ptosis. He had radioulnar synostosis and metacarpophalangeal-proximal interphalangeal symphalangism of D2-D5 bilaterally. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of cranial synostosis, multiple symphalangism, and long-bone abnormalities in our case are typical of other reported cases of fluconazole embryopathy. Our patient showed no evidence of embryopathy due to efavirenz, and he did not have the features of Antley-Bixler or other craniosynostosis syndromes. We review the literature regarding the teratogenic effects of prenatal exposure to fluconazole and provide additional evidence that prenatal fluconazole exposure has a clearly identifiable phenotype.     

A unique point mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene (FGFR3) defines a new craniosynostosis syndrome

The underlying basis of many forms of syndromic craniosynostosis has been defined on a molecular level. However, many patients with familial or sporadic craniosynostosis do not have the classical findings of those craniosynostosis syndromes. Here we present 61 individuals from 20 unrelated families where coronal synostosis is due to an amino acid substitution (Pro250Arg) that results from a single point mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene on chromosome 4p. In this instance, a new clinical syndrome is being defined on the basis of the molecular finding. In addition to the skull findings, some patients had abnormalities on radiographs of hands and feet, including thimble-like middle phalanges, coned epiphyses, and carpal and tarsal fusions. Brachydactyly was seen in some cases; none had clinically significant syndactyly or deviation of the great toe. Sensorineural hearing loss was present in some, and developmental delay was seen in a minority. While the radiological findings of hands and feet can be very helpful in diagnosing this syndrome, it is not in all cases clearly distinguishable on a clinical basis from other craniosynostosis syndromes. Therefore, this mutation should be tested for in patients with coronal synostosis.     

妊娠中期孕妇血糖水平变化与新生儿体质及大脑发育的关系

摘要 目的：探讨妊娠中期孕妇血糖水平变化与新生儿体质及大脑发育的关系。方法：2018年2月到2021年1月选择在本院建档分娩的妊娠中期妊娠期糖尿病(Gestational diabetes,GDM)孕妇105例作为研究对象,根据孕妇血糖控制情况进行分组,孕妇血糖控制较好纳入良好组,其他纳入对照组。调查分娩的新生儿体质、大脑发育情况并进行相关性分析。结果：在105例孕妇中,血糖控制良好85例,控制不良20例。良好组的孕周、年龄、孕前体重指数、孕次、产次等与对照组对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。良好组新生儿分娩第3个月的体重与身长都高于对照组(P<0.05)。良好组新生儿分娩第3个月的MDI与PDI评分都高于对照组(P<0.05)。在105例孕妇中,Spearsman相关分析显示血糖控制水平与新生儿的体重、身长、智力发育指数(Intelligence Development Index,MDI)评分、精神运动发育指数(Intelligence Development Index,PDI)评分等都存在相关性(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示血糖控制水平都为影响新生儿体重、身长、MDI评分、PDI评分的危险因素(P<0.05)。结论：妊娠中期妊娠期糖尿病孕妇血糖控制水平与新生儿体质、大脑发育存在相关性,血糖控制不佳可导致新生儿体质发育缓慢与智力水平下降。     

Metopic synostosis: Defining the temporal sequence of normal suture fusion and differentiating it from synostosis on the basis of computed tomography images

Only the metopic suture normally fuses during early childhood; all other cranial sutures normally fuse much later in life. Despite this, metopic synostosis is one of the least common forms of craniosynostosis. The temporal sequence of normal physiologic metopic suture fusion remains undefined and controversial. Therefore, diagnosis of metopic synostosis on the basis of computed tomography images alone can prove misleading. The present study sought to determine the normal sequence of metopic suture fusion and characterize both endocranial and ectocranial suture morphology. An analysis of computed tomography scans of 76 trauma patients, ranging in age from 10 days to 18 months, provided normative craniofacial data that could be compared to similar data obtained from the preoperative computed tomography scans of 30 patients who had undergone surgical treatment for metopic synostosis. Metopic suture fusion was complete by 6 to 8 months in all nonsynostotic patients, with initiation of suture fusion evident as early as 3 months of age. Fusion was found to commence at the nasion, proceed superiorly in progressive fashion, and conclude at the anterior fontanelle. Although an endocranial ridge was not commonly seen in synostotic patients, an endocranial metopic notch was virtually diagnostic of premature suture fusion and was seen in 93 percent of synostotic patients. A metopic notch was not seen in any nonsynostotic patient. The morphologic and normative craniofacial data presented permit diagnosis of metopic synostosis based on computed tomography images obtained beyond the normal fusion period.     

Different responses between thyroxine 5'-monodeiodinase and protein disulfide isomerase activities to dietary fat and thyroid status in rat liver

On the hypothesis that rat hepatic microsomal type I iodothyronine 5'-monodeiodinase (MDI) would be identical to hepatic protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) (Boado et al. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 155 1297-1304 (1988)), we examined the responses of these enzyme activities to dietary fat and thyroid status in rats. The hepatic MDI activity was higher in rats fed high fat diet than in rats fed low fat diet, but the hepatic PDI activity showed the reverse responses to the diets. Propylthiouracil administration (hypothyroidism) lowered the MDI activity, but elevated the PDI activity. Thyroxine administration (hyperthyroidism) elevated the MDI activity but had no effect on the PDI activity. These results indicate that the two enzyme activities are regulated by different mechanisms in vivo, suggesting that MDI and PDI are not identical enzymes.     

Molecular analysis of patients with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly (unilateral coronal synostosis)

Mutations in genes known to be responsible for most of the recognizable syndromes associated with bilateral coronal synostosis can be detected by molecular testing. The genetic alterations that could cause unilateral coronal synostosis are more elusive. It is recognized that FGFR and TWIST mutations can give rise to either bilateral or unilateral coronal synostosis, even in the same family. The authors undertook a prospective study of patients presenting with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly (unilateral coronal synostosis) to Children's Hospital Boston during the period from 1997 to 2000. Mutational analysis was performed on all patients and on selected parents whenever familial transmission was suspected. Intraoperative anthropometry was used in an effort to differentiate those patients in whom a mutation was detected from those in whom it was not. The anthropometric measures included bilateral sagittal orbital-globe distance, inter medial canthal distance, and nasal angulation. Macrocephaly and palpebral angulation were also considered possible determinants. There was a 2:1 female preponderance in 47 patients with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly. Mutations were found in eight of 47 patients: two patients with different single-amino-acid changes in FGFR2, three patients with FGFR3 Pro250Arg, and three patients with TWIST mutations. Another patient had craniofrontonasal syndrome for which a causative locus has been mapped to chromosome X, although molecular testing is not yet available. Two features were strongly associated with a detectable mutation in patients with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly: asymmetrical brachycephaly (retrusion of both supraorbital rims) and orbital hypertelorism. Other abnormalities in the craniofacial region and extremities were clues to a particular mutation in FGFR2, FGFR3, TWIST, or the X-linked mutation. Neither macrocephaly nor degree of nasal angulation nor relative vertical position of the lateral canthi correlated with mutational detection. An additional four patients in this study had either unilateral or bilateral coronal synostosis in an immediate relative and had anthropometric findings that predicted a mutation, and yet no genetic alteration was found. This suggests either that the authors' screening methods were not sufficiently sensitive or that perhaps there are other unknown pathogenic loci. Nevertheless, molecular testing is recommended for infants who have unilateral coronal synostosis, particularly if there are the anthropometric findings highlighted in this study or an otherwise suspicious feature in the child or a parent. Infants with either an identified or a suspected mutation usually need bilateral asymmetric advancement of the bandeau and may be more likely to require frontal revision in childhood.     

The craniofacial anomalies archive at St. Louis Children's Hospital: 20 years of craniofacial imaging experience.

This article describes how the Craniofacial Imaging Laboratory at the Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Deformities Institute, St. Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University Medical Center, has developed an electronic archive for the storage of computed tomography image digital data that is independent of scanner hardware and independent of units of storage media (i.e., floppy disks and optical disks). The archive represents one of the largest repositories of high-quality computed tomography data of children with craniofacial deformities in the world. Archiving reconstructed image data is essential for comparative imaging, surgical simulation, quantitative analysis, and use with solid model fabrication (e.g., stereolithography). One tertiary craniofacial center's experience in the establishment and maintenance of such an archive through three generations of storage technology is reported. The current archive is housed on an external 35-GB hard drive attached to a Windows-based desktop server. Data in the archive were categorized by specific demographics into groups of patients, number of scans, and diagnoses. The Craniofacial Imaging Laboratory archive currently contains computed tomography image digital data for 1827 individual scans. The earliest scan was done in 1980; the most recently stored scan for the purposes of this report occurred in May of 2000. The average number of scans archived per complete year was 94, with a range of 59 to 138. Of the 1827 total scans, 74 percent could be classified into specific diagnostic categories. The majority of the archive (55 percent) is composed of the following five diagnoses: sagittal synostosis (17 percent), unilateral coronal synostosis (11 percent), hemifacial microsomia (10 percent), plagiocephaly without synostosis (10 percent), and metopic synostosis (7 percent). Storage of computed tomography image data in a digital archive currently allows for continuous upgrading of image display and analysis and facilitates longitudinal and cross-sectional studies, both intramural and extramural. Internet access for clinical and research purposes is feasible, but contingent on protection of patient confidentiality. The future of digital imaging regarding craniofacial computed tomography scan storage and processing is also discussed.     

Simultaneous induction of apoptosis, collagen type I expression and mineralization in the developing coronal suture following FGF4 and FGF2 application

This study aimed to evaluate the disturbances in normal coronal suture development resulting in craniosynostosis, a congenital disorder in which the calvarial sutures close prematurely. Craniosynostosis syndromes can be caused by mutations in the genes encoding for the fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) 1, 2, and 3. These gain-of-function mutations cause the transcribed receptor to be constitutively activated. To mimic this genetic defect, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 2 or 4 was administered near the developing coronal suture in normal mouse embryos through ex utero surgery. The effect on apoptosis and bone differentiation, as collagen type I expression and mineralization, within the FGF-exposed coronal suture was investigated through (immuno)histochemical staining. An increase in the number of apoptotic cells together with ectopic collagen type I expression within the suture and accelerated mineralization followed FGF application. Macroscopically, this presented as a synostotic coronal suture. These results suggest that both apoptosis and differentiation are two processes that are simultaneously implicated in synostosis of the coronal suture in case of a FGFR-related craniosynostosis.     

胎盘组织学绒毛膜羊膜炎与未足月胎膜早破后早产儿脑损伤关系

目的:研究胎盘组织学绒毛膜羊膜炎与未足月胎膜早破后早产儿出现脑损伤的相关性。方法:选取我院妇产科2017年1月至2019年12月收治的因胎膜早破生产的未足月早产儿80例,根据是否存在绒毛膜羊膜炎分为观察组(绒毛膜羊膜炎)和对照组(无绒毛膜羊膜炎),每组40例,患儿于胎龄40 w时行颅脑核磁共振检查(Magnetic Resonance Examination,MRI),对比两组脑室周围白质软化(periventricular leukomalacia,PVL)阳性率,且采用新生儿20项行为神经评分量表(neonatal behavior neurological assessment,NBNA)评价两组患儿神经行为,然后在纠正胎龄3、6个月时对两组患儿进行智能发育指数(mental developmentalindex,MDI)及心理运动发育指数(psychomotor development index,PDI)测定并对比。结果:观察组PVL阳性率为27.5%,高于对照组的10.0%(P<0.05);观察组纠正胎龄40 w NBNA得分为(31.02±3.51)分,对照组为(35.21±4.02)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);胎龄3个月,MDI得分在观察组与对照组间差异无具有统计学意义(P>0.05),但其PDI得分低于对照组(P<0.05);胎龄6个月,观察组MDI及PDI得分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:绒毛膜羊膜炎与未足月胎膜早破后早产儿的脑部损伤情况具有一定相关性,可以作为预测早产儿脑损伤程度的一项指标。