极端嗜热古菌DNA修复核酸内切酶的研究进展

极端嗜热古菌由于生活在高温环境,其基因组DNA面临着严重的挑战,因此,它们如何维持其基因组稳定是本研究领域最为关注的科学问题之一。极端嗜热古菌具有与常温微生物相似的自发突变频率,暗示着它们比常温微生物具有更加有效的DNA修复体系进行修复高温所造成的基因组DNA损伤。目前,极端嗜热古菌DNA修复的分子机制尚不清楚。核酸内切酶在DNA修复途径中发挥着重要的作用。基因组序列显示极端嗜热古菌编码多种DNA修复核酸内切酶,但是其研究尚处于初期阶段。本文综述了极端嗜热古菌DNA修复核酸内切酶Nuc S、Endo V、Endo Q、XPF和Hjc的研究进展,并对今后的研究提出了展望。     

热休克蛋白对细胞凋亡信号转导途径的调节

细胞凋亡信号转导目前已迅速成为揭示细胞凋亡分子机制的前沿课题. 由于热休克蛋白(HSPs)在细胞生长调控和凋亡中发挥的重要作用, 人们进行了大量关于热休克蛋白与细胞凋亡信号转导途径调节机制的研究. 研究发现, 热休克蛋白家族的多个成员, 如HSP90, HSP70, HSP60, HSP27等能够在Fas死亡受体途径、JNK/SAPK途径、caspase途径等多个水平发挥调节作用, 并且部分依赖于热休克蛋白的“分子伴侣”作用, 控制着细胞生命进程.     

超嗜热古菌Sulfolobus tokodaii RadA蛋白的克隆表达及 其辐射可诱导性

RecA/Rad51/RadA家族蛋白是细胞内重要的重组修复蛋白,在功能上非常保守.研究发现在细菌、真核生物、甲烷古菌和嗜盐古菌细胞内RecA/Rad51/RadA均可以受紫外线辐射诱导转录.而对极端嗜热古菌中的RadA辐射可诱导性仍存在争议.通过体外表达极端嗜热古菌Sulfolobus tokodaii的RadA蛋白,制备抗体,利用免疫学方法并结合RT-PCR分析,对嗜热古菌S.tokodaii中RadA的辐射诱导进行了研究.经过100J/m2和200J/m2 UV辐照处理,radA基因的转录分别上调了2倍和3倍,同时RadA蛋白的表达分别上升了1.5倍和1倍.实验结果表明S.tokodaii中RadA可以被紫外线辐射诱导表达,证实了极端嗜热古菌S.tokodaii细胞中存在DNA损伤诱导反应的观点.     

极端嗜热古菌尿嘧啶DNA糖苷酶的研究进展

高温会加快碱基脱氨基反应形成损伤碱基的速率,进一步对脱氨基的碱基进行复制会导致突变。因此,极端嗜热古菌基因组的稳定性面临着其生存高温环境的挑战。胞嘧啶脱氨基形成尿嘧啶,是常见的脱碱基类型,复制DNA中尿嘧啶会造成GC→AT的突变。尿嘧啶DNA糖苷酶(Uracil DNA glycosylase,UDG)是修复DNA中尿嘧啶的关键酶。基于识别底物的特异性,UDG分为6个家族,广泛分布在细菌、古菌、真核生物以及一些病毒中。基因组序列显示,极端嗜热古菌至少编码一种UDG。目前,对于细菌和真核生物的UDG已进行了大量的研究,但是关于极端嗜热古菌UDG的研究相对较少,尚处于初期阶段。本文综述了极端嗜热古菌UDG的研究进展,并对今后的研究提出了展望。     

极端嗜盐古菌蛋白类抗生素——嗜盐菌素

古菌(Archaea)是一类与细菌及真核生物显著不同的生命的第三种形式[1],大多生活在极端或特殊环境,主要包括产甲烷古菌(Methanogenic Achaea)、极端嗜盐古菌(Extremely Halophilic Archaea)和极端嗜热古菌(Extremely Thermophilic Archaea)等三大类.极端古菌是极端环境微生物的重要成员,也是极端环境微生物资源开发的重要领域.其中,嗜盐古菌可产生一类蛋白类抗生素,称为嗜盐菌素(halocin).     

极端嗜酸热古菌Acidianus manzaensis胞外硫活化蛋白质基因的筛选及鉴定

以极端嗜酸热古菌(Acidianus manzaensis)为研究对象,基于比较蛋白质组学的研究方法筛选和鉴定了13个A.manzaensis胞外与硫活化相关的蛋白质基因,并从转录水平对其进行了验证。首先通过80℃缓慢摇动水浴30 min分别对A.manzaensis在单质硫(S0)和亚铁(Fe2+)为能源底物进行生长时的胞外蛋白质进行提取,并用双向电泳(2-DE)进行分离,然后选取在S0底物下差异表达的蛋白质斑点进行串联飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF/TOF)鉴定和生物信息学分析及功能预测,最后用实时定量PCR(RT-q PCR)对筛选得到的胞外S0活化相关蛋白基因进行转录水平的验证;最终获得了13个极端嗜酸热古菌A.manzaensis胞外活化S0相关的蛋白质基因。筛选得到的蛋白质中一半以上含有较多的半胱氨酸残基(Cys),说明胞外富含巯基(-SH)的蛋白参与了S0活化;其中谷氧还蛋白(glutaredoxin)和FAD键合氧化酶均含有-CXXC-结构域,且两种蛋白质的基因表达量较高,说明含有-CXXC-结构域的蛋白质在极端嗜酸热古菌A.manzaensis活化S0的过程中起重要的作用。     

心血管系统热休克蛋白的研究进展

多种应激因素如热应激,缺血,血流动力学变化能引起细胞内代谢异常,细胞骨架紊乱等一系列的病理改变,同时细胞亦相应合成一系列分子量不同的热休克蛋白分子（HSPs)。研究表明,HSPs通过其分子伴侣功能,对细胞产生保护作用。近年来的研究发现,在心肌缺血,缺血预处理,心肌肥大和血管损伤等病理生理条件下,HSP70,HSP90,HSP47,HSP32,HSP27等热休克蛋白分子均参与心血管系统的保护作用。     

极端嗜热古菌核酸内切酶Ⅲ的研究进展

胸腺嘧啶乙二醇(thymine glycol,Tg)是常见的氧化性DNA损伤碱基之一。DNA中的Tg能够分别阻止DNA聚合酶和RNA聚合酶进行DNA复制和转录,导致相应的生物学过程终止,进而会引起细胞的死亡,因此DNA中的Tg需要被修复。核酸内切酶Ⅲ(endonuclease Ⅲ,EndoⅢ)是一种双功能DNA糖苷酶,能够切除DNA中的Tg,从而启动碱基切除修复途径进行修复DNA中的Tg。细菌、古菌和真核生物的基因组序列中均存在有EndoⅢ蛋白的编码基因。目前,源自于细菌和真核生物的EndoⅢ已有较多的研究,而古菌EndoⅢ的研究相对较少。基于目前已有的极端嗜热古菌EndoⅢ的研究报道,本文综述了极端嗜热古菌EndoⅢ的研究进展,并展望了今后的研究方向。     

腾冲嗜热厌氧菌热休克蛋白60及其基因表达的热激动态变化分析

热休克蛋白60(HSP60)是细菌体内一种非常重要的分子伴侣,其可以协助蛋白质或肽链的正确折叠和构型,防止变性和降解。基于本实验室的早期观察,腾冲嗜热厌氧菌的HSP60是一个典型的温度相关蛋白质,在80℃的表达水平最高。为了进一步了解嗜热菌应急的分子机制,继续进行了在热激后HSP60基因表达的动态研究。将最适温度(75℃)下培养的腾冲嗜热厌氧菌迅速地转移至80℃继续培养,然后在不同的时间点上分别取样,并通过双向电泳、Western blot和Real_time PCR等方法,分析了HSP60在mRNA和蛋白质水平上的表达量的改变。试验结果表明,在80℃热处理4h内的短期应急过程中,HSP60蛋白水平一直呈上升趋势,而它的mRNA水平则表现为先升高后下降的一个非对称性的峰形变化。HSP60的mRNA和蛋白质的对温度的应答快慢程度是不同的。HSP60的mRNA水平的显著变化在1h内便可观察到,而蛋白质水平的显著改变要延迟3h左右。此外,HSP60的mRNA和蛋白质对温度的应答量变大小也是不同的。     

热休克蛋白的生物学作用和转录水平调控研究进展(英文)

热休克蛋白 (HSP)具有广泛的生物学功能 ,其表达方式有两种 :一种是诱导性表达 ,即当生物、细胞受到刺激时才进行表达 ;另一种是组成性表达 ,即在生物、细胞的正常生活、代谢过程中表达。HSP的这两种表达方式意味着HSP基因表达的调控方式和机理不同。本文简要介绍了热休克因子(HSF)的种类、结构及调控HSP基因表达的机理。HSF通过以下 4个步骤调节HSP基因表达 :( 1 )HSF由单体形式变成磷酸化的三聚体形式被激活 ;( 2 )三聚体形式的HSF与HSP基因的热休克元件(HSE)上相邻排列的 3个 5′ GAA 3′结合 ;( 3)与HSF结合后 ,HSE的活化域暴露 ,HSP基因转录 ;( 4 )HSP的mRNA 5′端前导区的特异结构适合于核糖体快速结合和高效翻译。不同生物体内的HSF作用有一定差异 ,功能较为明确的有 :( 1 )对应激信号敏感的HSF1 ;( 2 )对应激信号不敏感 ,对生长、发育、分化信号敏感的HSF2 ;( 3)起抑制HSP基因转录作用的HSF4。还有一些HSF(如HSF3)的作用机制较复杂 ,有待深入研究。此外 ,本文也简要介绍了HSP在衰老、免疫应答、细胞生存和凋亡平衡等中的作用 ,对了解和认识生物生长、发育、衰老、保护、免疫应答及细胞生存和凋亡平衡的分子机制有一定帮助。     

A review of acquired thermotolerance, heat-shock proteins, and molecular chaperones in archaea

Abstract: Acquired thermotolerance, the associated synthesis of heat-shock proteins (HSPs) under stress conditions, and the role of HSPs as molecular chaperones under normal growth conditions have been studied extensively in eukaryotes and bacteria, whereas research in these areas in archaea is only beginning. All organisms have evolved a variety of strategies for coping with high-temperature stress, and among these strategies is the increased synthesis of HSPs. The facts that both high temperatures and chemical stresses induce the HSPs and that some of the HSPs recognize and bind to unfolded proteins in vitro have led to the theory that the function of HSPs is to prevent protein aggregation in vivo. The facts that some HSPs are abundant under normal growth conditions and that they assist in protein folding in vitro have led to the theory that they assist protein folding in vivo; in this role, they are referred to as molecular chaperones. The limited research on acquired thermotolerance, HSPs, and molecular chaperones in archaea, particularly the hyperthermophilic archaea, suggests that these extremophiles provide a new perspective in these areas of research, both because they are members of a separate phylogenetic domain and because they have evolved to live under extreme conditions.     

Molecular chaperones: proposal of a systematic computer-oriented nomenclature and construction of a centralized database

Molecular chaperones are a wide group of unrelated protein families whose role is to assist others proteins. Comparably, under environmental stress, stress proteins behave as biocatalysts of protein stabilization. Stress proteins include a large class of proteins that were originally termed heat shock proteins (HSPs) due to their initial discovery in tissues exposed to elevated temperatures. Many, but not all, stress proteins and HSPs are molecular chaperones. Moreover, not all HSPs are derivable from stress. HSPs are structurally diversified by the contribution of various domains having specific roles. HSPs have been grouped, mainly on the basis of their molecular masses, into specific families that include small HSPs (sHSPs)/alpha-crystallins, HSP10s, HSP40s, HSP60s, HSP70s, HSP90s, HSP100s and HSP110s. The names of these major families are historical artefacts with limited information content. Using the current databases, names and proteic domains of many molecular chaperones in different species were analyzed. Although traditional names of HSPs are trivial, it is unrealistic to suggest replacing them, because they are preferred and widely used. Here we suggest that these traditional names be chaperoned, in silico, by a systematic nomenclature. Thus, for example, with the same intent of use of [trioxygen: O3] for ozone, we propose here C7HSP70[Ehsa]ER-P11021 for GRP78 (78 kDa endoplasmic Human molecular chaperone in HSP70 superfamily with P11021 as its accession number in the database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)). The proposed systematic computer-oriented naming and classification method is designed for HSPs and also their partners based on the number of amino acids, domain structure, phylogenetic domain, localization in the cell and accession number as stated in the NCBI. Arabidopsis thaliana was analyzed as a model, because it contains a large number of various HSPs localized in several organelles. Overall, this naming system helps in building, optimizing and managing a novel online database entirely devoted to HSPs. The purported taxonomy, coupled with the newly constructed database, can contribute to studies involving large amounts of stored data on HSPs.     

Localization of small heat shock proteins to the higher plant endomembrane system.

Three related gene families of low-molecular-weight (LMW) heat shock proteins (HSPs) have been characterized in plants. We describe a fourth LMW HSP family, represented by PsHSP22.7 from Pisum sativum and GmHSP22.0 from Glycine max, and demonstrate that this family of proteins is endomembrane localized. PsHSP22.7 and GmHSP22.0 are 76.7% identical at the amino acid level. Both proteins have amino-terminal signal peptides and carboxyl-terminal sequences characteristic of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention signals. The two proteins closely resemble class I cytoplasmic LMW HSPs, suggesting that they evolved from the cytoplasmic proteins through the addition of the signal peptide and ER retention motif. The endomembrane localization of these proteins was confirmed by cell fractionation. The polypeptide product of PsHSP22.7 mRNA was processed to a smaller-M(r) form by canine pancreatic microsomes; in vivo, GmHSP22.0 polysomal mRNA was found to be predominantly membrane bound. In vitro-processed PsHSP22.7 corresponded in mass and pI to one of two proteins detected in ER fractions from heat-stressed plants by using anti-PsHSP22.7 antibodies. Like other LMW HSPs, PsHSP22.7 was observed in higher-molecular-weight structures with apparent masses of between 80 and 240 kDa. The results reported here indicate that members of this new class of LMW HSPs are most likely resident ER proteins and may be similar in function to related LMW HSPs in the cytoplasm. Along with the HSP90 and HSP70 classes of HSPs, this is the third category of HSPs localized to the ER.     

Nuclear localization and the heat shock proteins

The highly conserved heat shock proteins (HSP) belong to a subset of cellular proteins that localize to the nucleus. HSPs are atypical nuclear proteins in that they localize to the nucleus selectively, rather than invariably. Nuclear localization of HSPs is associated with cell stress and cell growth. This aspect of HSPs is highly conserved with nuclear localization occurring in response to a wide variety of cell stresses. Nuclear localization is likely important for at least some of the heat shock proteins’ protective functions; little is known about the function of the heat shock proteins in the nucleus. Nuclear localization is signalled by the presence of a basic nuclear localization sequence (NLS) within a protein. Though most is known about HSP 72’s nuclear localization, the NLS(s) has not been definitively identified for any of the heat shock proteins. Likely more is involved than presence of a NLS; since the heat shock proteins only localize to the nucleus under selective conditions, nuclear localization must be regulated. HSPs also function as chaperons of nuclear transport, facilitating the movement of other macromolecules across the nuclear membrane. The mechanisms involved in chaperoning of proteins by HSPs into the nucleus are still being identified.     

Heat shock protein 25 or inducible heat shock protein 70 activates heat shock factor 1: dephosphorylation on serine 307 through inhibition of ERK1/2 phosphorylation

The expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs) is known to be increased via activation of heat shock factor 1 (HSF1), and excess expression of HSPs exerts feedback inhibition of HSF1. However, the molecular mechanism to modulate such relationships between HSPs and HSF1 is not clear. In the present study, we show that stable transfection of either Hsp25 or inducible Hsp70 (Hsp70i) increased expression of endogenous HSPs such as HSP25 and HSP70i through HSF1 activation. However, these phenomena were abolished when the dominant negative Hsf1 mutant was transfected to HSP25 or HSP70i overexpressed cells. Moreover, the increased HSF1 activity by either HSP25 or HSP70i was found to result from dephosphorylation of HSF1 on serine 307 that increased the stability of HSF1. Either HSP25 or HSP70i inhibited ERK1/2 phosphorylation because of increased MKP1 phosphorylation by direct interaction of these HSPs with MKP1. Treatment of HOS and NCI-H358 cells, which showed high expressions of endogenous HSF1, with small interfering RNA (siRNA) of either HSP27 (siHSP27)or HSP70i (siHSP70i) inhibited both HSP27 and HSP70i proteins; this was because of increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation and serine phosphorylation of HSF1. The results, therefore, suggested that when the HSF1 protein level was high in cancer cells, excess expression of HSP27 or HSP70i strongly facilitates the expression of HSP proteins through HSF1 activation, resulting in severe radio- or chemoresistance.     

Reconsideration of an early dogma,saying “there is no evidence for disulfide bonds in proteins from archaea”

Stability and function of a large number of proteins are crucially dependent on the presence of disulfide bonds. Recent genome analysis has pointed out an important role of disulfide bonds for the structural stabilization of intracellular proteins from hyperthermophilic archaea and bacteria. These findings contradict the conventional view that disulfide bonds are rare in those proteins. A specific protein, known as protein disulfide oxidoreductase (PDO) is recognized as a potential key enzyme in intracellular disulfide-shuffling in hyperthermophiles. The structure of this protein consists of two combined thioredoxin-related units which together, in tandem-like manner, form a closed protein domain. Each of these units contains a distinct CXXC active site motif. Both sites seem to have different redox properties. A relation to eukaryotic protein disulfide isomerase is suggested by the observed structural and functional characteristics of the protein. Enzymological studies have revealed that both, the archaeal and bacterial forms of this protein show oxidative and reductive activity and are able to isomerize protein disulfides. The variety of active site disulfides found in PDO’s from hyperthermophiles is puzzling. It is assumed, that PDO enzymes in hyperthermophilic archaea and bacteria may be part of a complex system involved in the maintenance of protein disulfide bonds.     

热休克蛋白对细胞凋亡的调控作用

热休克蛋白属于细胞内分子伴侣蛋白,除涉及细胞内一些蛋白质分子构象和稳定性的调节之外,热休克蛋白对细胞应激、代谢、增殖以及凋亡等生理过程均具有重要的调控作用。研究表明热休克蛋白对细胞凋亡的调控机制是复杂的,可直接作用于与凋亡相关的蛋白质,也可以通过影响细胞信号传递而间接影响凋亡的发生。由于热休克蛋白对细胞凋亡的调控机制大多依赖于其分子伴侣功能,阻断热休克蛋白的伴侣功能已经成为研究药物诱导肿瘤细胞凋亡的重要靶点。     

The role and therapeutic potential of heat shock proteins in haemorrhagic stroke

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are induced after haemorrhagic stroke, which includes subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). Most of these proteins function as neuroprotective molecules to protect cerebral neurons from haemorrhagic stroke and as markers to indicate cellular stress or damage. The most widely studied HSPs in SAH are HSP70, haeme oxygenase‐1 (HO‐1), HSP20 and HSP27. The subsequent pathophysiological changes following SAH can be divided into two stages: early brain injury and delayed cerebral ischaemia, both of which determine the outcome for patients. Because the mechanisms of HSPs in SAH are being revealed and experimental models in animals are continually maturing, new agents targeting HSPs with limited side effects have been suggested to provide therapeutic potential. For instance, some pharmaceutical agents can block neuronal apoptosis signals or dilate cerebral vessels by modulating HSPs. HO‐1 and HSP70 are also critical topics for ICH research, which can be attributed to their involvement in pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic potential. However, the process of HO‐1 metabolism can be toxic owing to iron overload and the activation of succedent pathways, for example, the Fenton reaction and oxidative damage; the overall effect of HO‐1 in SAH and ICH tends to be protective and harmful, respectively, given the different pathophysiological changes in these two types of haemorrhagic stroke. In the present study, we focus on the current understanding of the role and therapeutic potential of HSPs involved in haemorrhagic stroke. Therefore, HSPs may be potential therapeutic targets, and new agents targeting HSPs are warranted.