Identification of a novel protonation pattern for carboxylic acids upon Q(B) photoreduction in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction center mutants at Asp-L213 and Glu-L212 sites

In the reaction center from the photosynthetic purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, light energy is rapidly converted to chemical energy through coupled electron-proton transfer to a buried quinone molecule Q(B). Involved in the proton uptake steps are carboxylic acids, which have characteristic infrared vibrations that are observable using light-induced Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy. Upon formation, Q(B)(-) induces protonation of Glu-L212, located within 5 A of Q(B), resulting in a IR signal at 1728 cm(-1). However, no other IR signal is observed within the classic absorption range of protonated carboxylic acids (1770-1700 cm(-1)). In particular, no signal for Asp-L213 is found despite its juxtaposition to Q(B) and importance for proton uptake on the second electron-transfer step. In an attempt to uncover the reason behind this lack of signal, the microscopic electrostatic environment in the vicinity of Q(B) was modified by interchanging Asp and Glu at the L213 and L212 positions. The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) FTIR spectrum of the Asp-L212/Glu-L213 swap mutant in the 1770-1700 cm(-1) range shows several distinct new signals, which are sensitive to (1)H/(2)H isotopic exchange, indicating that the reduction of Q(B) results in the change of the protonation state of several carboxylic acids. The new bands at 1752 and 1747 cm(-1) were assigned to an increase of protonation in response to Q(B) reduction of Glu-L213 and Asp-L212, respectively, based on the effect of replacing them with their amine analogues. Since other carboxylic acid signals were observed, it is concluded that the swap mutations at L212 and L213 affect a cluster of carboxylic acids larger than the L212/L213 acid pair. Implications for the native reaction center are discussed.     

Simultaneous replacement of Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 with Asn increases proton uptake by Glu-L212 upon first electron transfer to QB in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the first electron transfer to the secondary quinone acceptor Q(B) is coupled to the protonation of Glu-L212, located approximately 5 A from the center of Q(B). Upon the second electron transfer to Q(B), Glu-L212 is involved in fast proton delivery to the reduced Q(B). Since Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 play an important role in the proton transfer to the Q(B) site [Paddock, M. L., Adelroth, P., Chang, C., Abresch, E. C., Feher, G., and Okamura, M. Y. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 6893-6902], we investigated the effects of replacing one or both Asp residues with Asn on proton uptake by Glu-L212 using FTIR difference spectroscopy. Upon the first electron transfer to Q(B), the amplitude of the proton uptake by Glu-L212 at pH 8 is increased in the single and double mutant RCs, as is evident from the larger intensity (by 35-55%) of the carboxylic acid band at 1727 cm(-1) in the Q(B)(-)/Q(B) difference spectra of mutant RCs, compared to that at 1728 cm(-1) in native RCs. This implies that the extent of ionization of Glu-L212 in the Q(B) ground state is greater in the mutants than in native RCs and that Asp-M17 and Asp-L210 are at least partially ionized near neutral pH in native RCs. In addition, no changes in the protonation state or the environment of these two residues are detected upon Q(B) reduction. The absence of the 1727 cm(-1) signal in all of the RCs lacking Glu-L212, confirms that the positive band at 1728-1727 cm(-1) probes the protonation of Glu-L212 in native and mutant RCs.     

Characterization of the photoreduction of the secondary quinone QB in the photosynthetic reaction center from rhodobacter capsulatus with FTIR spectroscopy

The photoreduction of the secondary quinone acceptor QB in reaction centers (RCs) of the photosynthetic bacteria Rhodobacter (Rb.) capsulatus has been investigated by light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy in 1H2O and 2H2O. The Q-B/QB FTIR spectra reflect reorganization of the protein upon electron transfer, changes of protonation state of carboxylic acid groups, and (semi)quinone-protein interactions. As expected from the conservation of most of the amino acids near QB in the RCs from Rb. capsulatus and Rb. sphaeroides, several protein and quinone IR bands are common to both spectra, e.g., the 1728 cm-1 band is assigned to proton uptake by a carboxylic acid residue, most probably Glu L212 as previously proposed for Rb. sphaeroides RCs. However, noticeable changes are observed at 1709 cm-1 (deprotonation of a Glu or Asp residue), 1674 and 1659 cm-1 (side chain and/or backbone), around 1540 cm-1 (amide II), and in the semiquinone absorption range. This FTIR study demonstrates that the environment of the secondary quinone in Rb. capsulatus is close but not identical to that in Rb. sphaeroides suggesting slight differences in the structural organization of side chains and/or ordered water molecules near QB.     

Redox potential of quinones in photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: dependence on protonation of Glu-L212 and Asp-L213

The absolute values of the one-electron redox potentials of the two quinones (Q(A) and Q(B)) in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were calculated by evaluating the electrostatic energies from the solution of the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation at pH 7.0. The redox potential for Q(A) was calculated to be between -173 and -160 mV, which is close to the lowest measured values that are assumed to refer to nonequilibrated protonation patterns in the redox state Q(A)(-). The redox potential of quinone Q(B) is found to be about 160-220 mV larger for the light-exposed than for the dark-adapted structure. These values of the redox potentials are obtained if Asp-L213 is nearly protonated (probability 0.75-1.0) before and after electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B), while Glu-L212 is partially protonated (probability 0.6) in the initial state Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) and fully protonated in the final state Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-). Conversely, if the charge state of the quinones is varied from Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) to Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-) corresponding to the electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B), Asp-L213 remains protonated, while Glu-L212 changes its protonation state from 0.15 H(+) to fully protonated. In agreement with results from FTIR spectra, there is proton uptake at Glu-L212 going along with the electron transfer, whereas Asp-L213 does not change its protonation state. However, in our simulations Asp-L213 is considered to be protonated rather than ionized as deduced from FTIR spectra. The calculated redox potential of Q(A) shows little dependence on the charge state of Asp-L213, which is due to a strong coupling with the protonation state of Asp-M17 but increases by 50 mV if Glu-L212 changes from the ionized to the protonated charge state. Both are in agreement with fluorescence measurements observing the decay of SP(+)Q(A)(-) in a wide pH regime. The computed difference in redox potential of Q(B) in the light-exposed and dark-adapted structure was traced back to the hydrogen bond of Q(B) with His-L190 that is lost in the dark-adapted structure and the charge of the non-heme iron atom, which is closer to Q(B) in the light-exposed than in the dark-adapted structure.     

Proton and electron transfer in the acceptor quinone complex of Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers: characterization of site-directed mutants of the two ionizable residues, GluL212 and AspL213, in the QB binding site.

Proton and electron transfer events in reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were investigated by site-directed mutagenesis of glutamic acid at position 212 and aspartic acid at 213 in the secondary quinone (QB) binding domain of the L subunit. These residues were mutated singly to the corresponding amides (mutants L212EQ and L213DN) and together to give the double mutant (L212EQ/L213DN). In the double mutant RCs, the rate of electron transfer from the primary (QA) to the secondary (QB) acceptor quinones is fast (tau approximately 300 microseconds) and is pH independent from pH 5 to 11. The rate of recombination between the oxidized primary donor, P+, and QB- is also pH independent and much slower (tau approximately 10 s) than in the wild type (Wt), indicating a significant stabilization of the QB- semiquinone. In the double mutant, and in L213DN mutant RCs at low pH, the P+QB- decay is suggested to occur significantly via a direct recombination rather than by repopulating the P+QA- state, as in the Wt. Comparison of the behavior of Wt and the three mutant RC types leads to the following conclusions: the pK of AspL213 in the Wt is approximately 4 for the QAQB state (pKQB) and approximately 5 for the QAQB-state (pKQB-); for GluL212, pKQB approximately 9.5 and pKQB- approximately 11. In L213DN mutant RCs, pKQB of GluL212 is less than or equal to 7, indicating that the high pK values of GluL212 in the Wt are due largely to electrostatic interaction with the ionized AspL213 which contributes a shift of at least 2.5 pH units. Transfer of the second electron and all associated proton uptake to form QBH2 is drastically inhibited in double mutant and L213DN mutant RCs. At pH greater than or equal to 8, the rates are at least 10(4)-fold slower than in Wt RCs. In L212EQ mutant RCs the second electron transfer and proton uptake are biphasic. The fast phase of the electron transfer is similar to that of the Wt, but the extent of rapid transfer is pH dependent, revealing the pH dependence of the equilibrium QA(-)QB- in equilibrium with QAQBH-. The estimated limits on the pK values--pKQA-QB-less than or equal to 7.3, pKQAQB2- greater than or equal to 10.4--are similar to those derived earlier for Wt RCs [Kleinfeld et al. (1985) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 809, 291-310] and may pertain to the quinone head group, per se.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Calculated protein and proton motions coupled to electron transfer: electron transfer from QA- to QB in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers.

Reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were subjected to Monte Carlo sampling to determine the Boltzmann distribution of side-chain ionization states and positions and buried water orientation and site occupancy. Changing the oxidation states of the bacteriochlorophyll dimer electron donor (P) and primary (QA) and secondary (QB) quinone electron acceptors allows preparation of the ground (all neutral), P+QA-, P+QB-, P0QA-, and P0QB- states. The calculated proton binding going from ground to other oxidation states and the free energy of electron transfer from QA-QB to form QAQB- (DeltaGAB) compare well with experiment from pH 5 to pH 11. At pH 7 DeltaGAB is measured as -65 meV and calculated to be -80 meV. With fixed protein positions as in standard electrostatic calculations, DeltaGAB is +170 meV. At pH 7 approximately 0.2 H+/protein is bound on QA reduction. On electron transfer to QB there is little additional proton uptake, but shifts in side chain protonation and position occur throughout the protein. Waters in channels leading from QB to the surface change site occupancy and orientation. A cluster of acids (GluL212, AspL210, and L213) and SerL223 near QB play important roles. A simplified view shows this cluster with a single negative charge (on AspL213 with a hydrogen bond to SerL233) in the ground state. In the QB- state the cluster still has one negative charge, now on the more distant AspL210. AspL213 and SerL223 move so SerL223 can hydrogen bond to QB-. These rearrangements plus other changes throughout the protein make the reaction energetically favorable.     

Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: cooperation between Asp-M17 and Asp-L210 facilitates proton transfer to the secondary quinone (QB)

The reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides uses light energy to reduce and protonate a quinone molecule, Q(B) (the secondary quinone electron acceptor), to form quinol, Q(B)H2. Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 have been proposed to be components of the pathway for proton transfer [Axelrod, H. L., Abresch, E. C., Paddock, M. L., Okamura, M. Y., and Feher, G. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 1542-1547]. To test the importance of these residues for efficient proton transfer, the rates of the proton-coupled electron-transfer reaction k(AB)(2) (Q(A-*)Q(B-*) + H+ <==>Q(A-*)Q(B)H* --> Q(A)Q(B)H-) and its associated proton uptake were measured in native and mutant RCs, lacking one or both Asp residues. In the double mutant RCs, the k(AB)(2) reaction and its associated proton uptake were approximately 300-fold slower than in native RCs (pH 8). In contrast, single mutant RCs displayed reaction rates that were < or =3-fold slower than native (pH 8). In addition, the rate-limiting step of k(AB)(2) was changed from electron transfer (native and single mutants) to proton transfer (double mutant) as shown from the lack of a dependence of the observed rate on the driving force for electron transfer in the double mutant RCs compared to the native or single mutants. This implies that the rate of the proton-transfer step was reduced (> or =10(3)-fold) upon replacement of both Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 with Asn. Similar, but less drastic, differences were observed for k(AB)(1), which at pH > or =8 is coupled to the protonation of Glu-L212 [(Q(A-*)Q(B))-Glu- + H+ --> (Q(A)Q(B-*)-GluH]. These results show that the pathway for proton transfer from solution to reduced Q(B) involves both Asp-L210 and Asp-M17, which provide parallel branches to the proton-transfer pathway and through their electrostatic interaction have a cooperative effect on the proton-transfer rate. A possible mechanism for the cooperativity is discussed.     

Reduction and protonation of the secondary quinone acceptor of Rhodobacter sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction center: kinetic model based on a comparison of wild-type chromatophores with mutants carrying Arg-->Ile substitution at sites 207 and 217 in the L-subunit

After the light-induced charge separation in the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the electron reaches, via the tightly bound ubiquinone QA, the loosely bound ubiquinone Q(B) After two subsequent flashes of light, Q(B) is reduced to ubiquinol Q(B)H2, with a semiquinone anion Q-(B) formed as an intermediate after the first flash. We studied Q(B)H2 formation in chromatophores from Rb. sphaeroides mutants that carried Arg-->Ile substitution at sites 207 and 217 in the L-subunit. While Arg-L207 is 17 A away from Q(B), Arg-L217 is closer (9 A) and contacts the Q(B)-binding pocket. From the pH dependence of the charge recombination in the RC after the first flash, we estimated deltaG(AB), the free energy difference between the Q-(A)Q(B) and Q(A)Q-(B) states, and pK212, the apparent pK of Glu-L212, a residue that is only 4 A away from Q(B). As expected, the replacement of positively charged arginines by neutral isoleucines destabilized the Q-(B) state in the L217RI mutant to a larger extent than in the L207RI one. Also as expected, pK212 increased by approximately 0.4 pH units in the L207RI mutant. The value of pK212 in the L217RI mutant decreased by 0.3 pH units, contrary to expectations. The rate of the Q-(A)Q-(B)-->Q(A)Q(B)H2 transition upon the second flash, as monitored by electrometry via the accompanying changes in the membrane potential, was two times faster in the L207RI mutant than in the wild-type, but remained essentially unchanged in the L217RI mutant. To rationalize these findings, we developed and analyzed a kinetic model of the Q-(A)Q-(B)-->Q(A)Q(B)H2 transition. The model properly described the available experimental data and provided a set of quantitative kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of the Q(B) turnover. The non-electrostatic, 'chemical' affinity of the QB site to protons proved to be as important for the attracting protons from the bulk, as the appropriate electrostatic potential. The mutation-caused changes in the chemical proton affinity could be estimated from the difference between the experimentally established pK2J2 shifts and the expected changes in the electrostatic potential at Glu-L212, calculable from the X-ray structure of the RC. Based on functional studies, structural data and kinetic modeling, we suggest a mechanistic scheme of the QB turnover. The detachment of the formed ubiquinol from its proximal position next to Glu-L212 is considered as the rate-limiting step of the reaction cycle.     

Energetics of proton transfer pathways in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The Glu-H173 activated mutants

Electron transfer between the primary and secondary quinones (Q(A), Q(B)) in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (bRC) is coupled with proton uptake at Q(B). The protons are conducted from the cytoplasmic side, probably with the participation of two water channels. Mutations of titratable residues like Asp-L213 to Asn (inhibited mutant) or the double mutant Glu-L212 to Ala/Asp-L213 to Ala inhibit these electron transfer-coupled proton uptake events. The inhibition of the proton transfer (PT) process in the single mutant can be restored by a second mutation of Arg-M233 to Cys or Arg-H177 to His (revertant mutant). These revertant mutants shed light on the location of the main proton transfer pathway of wild type bRC. In contrast to the wild type and inhibited mutant bRC, the revertant mutant bRC showed notable proton uptake at Glu-H173 upon formation of the Q(B)- state. In all of these mutants, the pK(a) of Asp-M17 decreased by 1.4-2.4 units with respect to the wild type bRC, whereas a significant pK(a) upshift of up to 5.8 units was observed at Glu-H122, Asp-H170, Glu-H173, and Glu-H230 in the revertant mutants. These residues belonging to the main PT pathway are arranged along water channel P1 localized mainly in subunit H. bRC possesses subunit H, which has no counterpart in photosystem II. Thus, bRC may possess alternative PT pathways involving water channels in subunit H, which becomes active in case the main PT pathway is blocked.     

Steady-state FTIR spectra of the photoreduction of QA and QB in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers provide evidence against the presence of a proposed transient electron acceptor X between the two quinones

In the reaction center (RC) of the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, two ubiquinone molecules, QA and QB, play a pivotal role in the conversion of light energy into chemical free energy by coupling electron transfer to proton uptake. In native RCs, the transfer of an electron from QA to QB takes place in the time range of 5-200 micros. On the basis of time-resolved FTIR step-scan measurements in native RCs, a new and unconventional mechanism has been proposed in which QB- formation precedes QA- oxidation [Remy, A., and Gerwert, K. (2003) Nat. Struct. Biol. 10, 637-644]. The IR signature of the proposed transient intermediary electron acceptor (denoted X) operating between QA and QB has been recently measured by the rapid-scan technique in the DN(L210) mutant RCs, in which the QA to QB electron transfer is slowed 8-fold compared to that in native RCs. This IR signature has been reported as a difference spectrum involving states X+, X, QA, and QA- [Hermes, S., et al. (2006) Biochemistry 45, 13741-13749]. Here, we report the steady-state FTIR difference spectra of the photoreduction of either QA or QB measured in both native and DN(L210) mutant RCs in the presence of potassium ferrocyanide. In these spectra, the CN stretching marker modes of ferrocyanide and ferricyanide allow the extent of the redox reactions to be quantitatively compared and are used for a precise normalization of the QA-/QA and QB-/QB difference spectra. The calculated QA- QB/QA QB- double-difference spectrum in DN(L210) mutant RCs is closely equivalent to the reported QA- X+/QA X spectrum in the rapid-scan measurement. We therefore conclude that species X+ and X are spectrally indistinguishable from QB and QB-, respectively. Further comparison of the QA- QB/QA QB- double-difference spectra in native and DN(L210) RCs also allows the possibility that QB- formation precedes QA- reoxidation to be ruled out for native RCs.     

Rapid-scan Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy shows coupling of GLu-L212 protonation and electron transfer to Q(B) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers

Rapid-scan Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy was used to investigate the electron transfer reaction Q(A-)Q(B)-->Q(A)Q(B-) (k(AB)(1)) in mutant reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, where Asp-L210 and/or Asp-M17 have been replaced with Asn. Mutation of both residues decreases drastically k(AB)(1)), attributed to slow proton transfer to Glu-L212, which becomes rate limiting for electron transfer to Q(B) [M.L. Paddock et al., Biochemistry 40 (2001) 6893]. In the double mutant, the FTIR difference spectrum recorded during the time window 4-29 ms following a flash showed peaks at 1670 (-), 1601 (-) and 1467 (+) cm(-1), characteristic of Q(A) reduction. The time evolution of the spectra shows reoxidation of Q(A-) and concomitant reduction of Q(B) with a kinetics of about 40 ms. In native reaction centers and in both single mutants, formation of Q(B-) occurs much faster than in the double mutant. Within the time resolution of the technique, protonation of Glu-L212, as characterized by an absorption increase at 1728 cm(-1) [E. Nabedryk et al., Biochemistry 34 (1995) 14722], was found to proceed with the same kinetics as reduction of Q(B) in all samples. These rapid-scan FTIR results support the model of proton uptake being rate limiting for the first electron transfer from Q(A-) to Q(B) and the identification of Glu-L212 as the main proton acceptor in the state Q(A)Q(B-).     

An isotope-edited FTIR investigation of the role of Ser-L223 in binding quinone (QB) and semiquinone (QB-) in the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from the purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, proton-coupled electron-transfer reactions occur at the secondary quinone (Q(B)) site. Several nearby residues are important for both binding and redox chemistry involved in the light-induced conversion from Q(B) to quinol Q(B)H(2). Ser-L223 is one of the functionally important residues located near Q(B). To obtain information on the interaction between Ser-L223 and Q(B) and Q(B)(-), isotope-edited Q(B)(-)/Q(B) FTIR difference spectra were measured in a mutant RC in which Ser-L223 is replaced with Ala and compared to the native RC. The isotope-edited IR fingerprint spectra for the C=O [see text] and C=C [see text] modes of Q(B) (Q(B)(-)) in the mutant are essentially the same as those of the native RC. These findings indicate that highly equivalent interactions of Q(B) and Q(B)(-) with the protein occur in both native and mutant RCs. The simplest explanation of these results is that Ser-L223 is not hydrogen bonded to Q(B) or Q(B)(-) but presumably forms a hydrogen bond to a nearby acid group, preferentially Asp-L213. The rotation of the Ser OH proton from Asp-L213 to Q(B)(-) is expected to be an important step in the proton transfer to the reduced quinone. In addition, the reduced quinone remains firmly bound, indicating that other distinct hydrogen bonds are more important for stabilizing Q(B)(-). Implications on the design features of the Q(B) binding site are discussed.     

Small weak acids stimulate proton transfer events in site-directed mutants of the two ionizable residues, GluL212 and AspL213, in the QB-binding site of Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction center.

Mutations of the two ionizable residues, GluL212 and AspL213, in the secondary quinone (QB) binding site of reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides cause major dysfunctions in the proton transfer processes leading to the formation of quinol. Mutant RCs with AspL213----Asn are especially severely blocked, and the rate of the proton-limited transfer of the second electron is at least 10(4) times slower than in the wild-type. Small, weak acids, such as azide/hydrazoic acid (N3-/HN3;pK approximately 4.7) accelerated the electron transfer rate in mutant RCs in a pH and concentration-dependent manner, consistent with their functioning as protein-penetrating protonophores, delivering protons to the QB site in a non-specific, diffusive process. Other small weak acids acted similarly with efficacies dependent on their size and pK values. In terms of the concentration of protonated species, the relative effectiveness was: nitrite greater than cyanate approximately formate greater than azide much greater than acetate. The behavior of bacterial RCs containing the AspL213----Asn mutation resembles that of bicarbonate-depleted photosystem II, and the mutational block is partially alleviated by bicarbonate. The possibility is discussed that bicarbonate acts in PS II as an analogue to the carboxylic acid residues of the bacterial proton conduction pathway.     

Coupling of light-induced electron transfer to proton uptake in photosynthesis

Light energy is transformed into chemical energy in photosynthesis by coupling a light-induced electron transfer to proton uptake. The resulting proton gradient drives ATP synthesis. In this study, we monitored the light-induced reactions in a 100-kDa photosynthetic protein from 30 ns to 35 s by FTIR difference spectroscopy. The results provide detailed mechanistic insights into the electron and proton transfer reactions of the QA to QB transition: reduction of QA in picoseconds induces protonation of histidines, probably of His126 and His128 in the H subunit at the entrance of the proton uptake channel, and of Asp210 in the L subunit inside the channel at 12 micros and 150 micros. This seems to be a prerequisite for the reduction of QB, mainly at 150 micros. QA- is reoxidized at 1.1 ms, and a proton is transferred from Asp210 to Glu212 in the L subunit, the proton donor to QB-. Notably, our data indicate that QB is not reduced directly by QA- but presumably through an intermediary electron donor.     

Evidence for delocalized anticooperative flash induced proton binding as revealed by mutants at the M266His iron ligand in bacterial reaction centers

Bacterial reaction centers (RCs) convert light energy into chemical free energy via the double reduction and protonation of the secondary quinone electron acceptor, QB, to the dihydroquinone QBH2. Two RC mutants (M266His --> Leu and M266His --> Ala) with a modified ligand of the non-heme iron have been studied by flash-induced absorbance change spectroscopy. No important changes were observed for the rate constants of the first and second electron transfers between the first quinone electron acceptor, QA, and QB. However, in the M266HL mutant a destabilization of approximately 40 meV of the free energy level of QA- was observed, at variance with the M266HA mutant. The superposition of the three-dimensional X-ray structures of the three proteins in the QA region provides no obvious explanation for the energy modification in the M266HL mutant. The shift of the midpoint redox potential of QA/QA- in M266HL caused accelerated recombination of the charges in the P+ QA- state of the RCs where the native QA was replaced by a low potential anthraquinone (AQA). As previously reported for the native RCs, in the M266HL we observed a biphasicity of the P+ AQA- --> P AQA charge recombination. Interestingly, both phases present a similar acceleration in the M266HL mutant with respect to the wild type. The pH dependencies of the proton uptake upon QA- and QB- formations are superimposable in both mutants but very different from those of native RCs. The data measured in mutants are similar to those that we previously obtained on strains modified at various sites of the cytoplasmic region. The similarity of the response to these different mutations is puzzling, and we propose that it arises from a collective behavior of multiple acidic residues resulting in strongly anticooperative proton binding. The unspecific disappearance of the high pH band of proton uptake observed in all these mutants appears as the natural consequence of removing any member of an interactive proton cluster. This long range interaction also accounts for the similar responses to mutations of the proton uptake pattern induced by either QA- or QB-. We surmise that the presence of an extended protonated water H-bond network providing protons to QB is responsible for these effects.     

Conformational heterogeneity of the bacteriopheophytin electron acceptor HA in reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas viridis revealed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and site-directed mutagenesis.

The light-induced Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectra corresponding to the photoreduction of either the HA bacteriopheophytin electron acceptor (HA-/HA spectrum) or the QA primary quinone (QA-/QA spectrum) in photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) of Rhodopseudomonas viridis are reported. These spectra have been compared for wild-type (WT) RCs and for two site-directed mutants in which the proposed interactions between the carbonyls on ring V of HA and the RC protein have been altered. In the mutant EQ(L104), the putative hydrogen bond between the protein and the 9-keto C=O of HA should be affected by changing Glu L104 to a Gln. In the mutant WF(M250), the van der Waals interactions between Trp M250 and the 10a-ester C=O of HA should be modified. The characteristic effects of both mutations on the FTIR spectra support the proposed interactions and allow the IR modes of the 9-keto and 10a-ester C=O of HA and HA- to be assigned. Comparison of the HA-/HA and QA-/QA spectra leads us to conclude that the QA-/QA IR signals in the spectral range above 1700 cm-1 are largely dominated by contributions from the electrostatic response of the 10a-ester C=O mode of HA upon QA photoreduction. A heterogeneity in the conformation of the 10a-ester C=O mode of HA in WT RCs, leading to three distinct populations of HA, appears to be related to differences in the hydrogen-bonding interactions between the carbonyls of ring V of HA and the RC protein. The possibility that this structural heterogeneity is related to the observed multiexponential kinetics of electron transfer and the implications for primary processes are discussed. The effect of 1H/2H exchange on the QA-/QA spectra of the WT and mutant RCs shows that neither Glu L104 nor any other exchangeable carboxylic residue changes appreciably its protonation state upon QA reduction.     

In bacterial reaction centers protons can diffuse to the secondary quinone by alternative pathways.

The mechanisms of proton conduction to the reduced secondary quinone in bacterial reaction centers were studied in wild-type and genetically modified reaction centers from Rhodobacter capsulatus. In the L212-213AA double mutant (L212Glu----Ala, L213Asp----Ala), reaction center function is severely altered. However, a photocompetent revertant of this strain which carries a third 'compensating' mutation, M231Arg----Leu, at about 15 A from the secondary quinone, displays the normal proton binding function of the reaction center. Furthermore, the apparent pK values of group(s) involved in the stabilization of the semiquinone anion are restored by that mutation. We conclude that L212Glu and L213Asp are not obligatory residues for proton donation to QB in Rb. capsulatus. We suggest that protons can be delivered to the QB site from the cytoplasm via a network of proton channels activated by compensatory mutations, possibly involving water molecules bound in the interior of the reaction center.     

Identification of proton transfer pathways in the X-ray crystal structure of the bacterial reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Structural features that have important implications for the fundamental process of transmembrane proton transfer are examined in the recently published high resolution atomic structures of the reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides in the dark adapted state (DQ_AQ_B) and the charged separated state (D⁺Q_AQ_B ^–); the latter is the active state for proton transfer to the semiquinone. The structures have been determined at 2.2 Å and 2.6 Å resolution, respectively, as reported by Stowell et al. (1997) [Science 276: 812–816]. Three possible proton transfer pathways (P1, P2, P3) consisting of water molecules and/or protonatable residues were identified which connect the Q_B binding region with the cytoplasmic exposed surface at Asp H224 & Asp M240 (P1), Tyr M3 (P2) and Asp M17 (P3). All three represent possible pathways for proton transfer into the RC. P1 contains an uninterrupted chain of water molecules. This path could, in addition, facilitate the exchange of quinone for quinol during the photocycle by allowing water to move into and out of the binding pocket. Located near these pathways is a cluster of electrostatically interacting acid residues (Asp-L213, Glu-H173, Asp-M17, Asp H124, Asp-L210 and Asp H170) each being within 4.5 Å of a neighboring carboxylic acid or a bridging water molecule. This cluster could serve as an internal proton reservoir facilitating fast protonation of Q_B ^– that could occur at a rate greater than that attainable by proton uptake from solution.