Host–microbe interactions: bacteria

A selection of World Wide Web sites relevant to papers published in this issue of Current Opinion in Microbiology.     

Introduction: Plant–herbivore interactions

This special feature resulted from a symposium entitled "Interactions Between Plants and Their Herbivores," held during the Meeting of the Society of Population Ecology in Ohmi-Shirahama, Shiga, Japan, in October 1999 (Chairperson of Symposium: Professor Emeritus E. Kuno of Kyoto University). This theme emerged from discussions by the organizing committee for this symposium: N. Yamamura, J. Takabayashi, T. Nishida, and N. Ohsaki. Professor Mark D. Rausher of Duke University was invited as a special lecturer. In this series of reports, five of the seven participants illustrate the variation found in plant–herbivore interactions and address some problems inherent in current theory.     

Thermal comfort: multisensory interactions?

Experimentally, the effects of environmental conditions upon human capabilities have been studied most often through the imposition of a single stressor in isolation. Although it seems to be a common belief that thermal comfort can be influenced by concomitant stimulation of non-tactile sensorial modalities, few studies have succeeded in delineating non-tactile stimulations, which interact with thermal sensation and thermal comfort. Here we briefly overview neurophysiological and behavioural findings in multisensory influences on thermal sensation and thermal comfort.     

Porphyrin-membrane interactions: binding or partition?

Porphyrins are photodynamic drugs employed in an experimental tumor-treatment modality in which cell membranes are one of the primary drug-action sites. To gain insight into the nature of the interaction of these drugs with those primary sites we have studied the affinity of porphyrins to the lipid moieties of biological membranes, at the molecular level. The association of porphyrins to large unilamellar liposomes, modeling the lipid regions of biological membranes was studied (at equilibrium) for deuteroporphyrin IX and protoporphyrin IX, at neutral pH and 37 degrees C, taking into account porphyrin aggregation. Two thermodynamic approaches were investigated: (i) Simple partition equilibria between the external aqueous phase and the lipid bilayer, for drug monomers and dimers. (ii) Binding equilibria of drug monomers and dimers to the lipid bilayer. Using two types of experimental design and processing the data according to the expectations of both approaches, three different models for the binding (differing in the participation assigned to the dimer) were considered. Our major findings are: (a) The data clearly do not fit with the expectations for simple partition equilibria, nor with binding models assuming direct participation of the dimers. (b) The data fit well with a binding process, in which the membrane binds the porphyrin monomers only, with the dimers participating indirectly through the aqueous dimerization equilibrium. (c) At 37 degrees C and neutral pH, for liposomes composed of phosphatidylcholine/cholesterol at molar ratios of 3:2, we found for both investigated species a binding constant of 2.3 x 10(4) M-1. (d) For each species the binding constant is independent of the initial and final states of drug aggregation in the aqueous phase.     

Grassland-herbivore interactions: how do grazers coexist?

We develop a new approach to modeling grazing systems that links foraging characteristics (intake and digestive constraints) with resource dynamics via the probability of encounter with different grass heights. Three complementary models are presented: the generation of a grass height structure through selective grazing; investigating the conditions for consumer coexistence; and, using a simplified resource structure, the consequences for consumer abundance. The main finding is that coexistence between grazers differing in body size is possible if a single-resource type becomes differentiated in its height structure. Large grazers can facilitate food availability for smaller species but with the latter being competitively dominant. The relative preference given to different resource partitions is important in determining the nature of population interactions. Large-body and small-body grazer populations can interact through competitive, parasitic, commensalist, or amensalist relationships, depending on the way they partition the resource as well as their relative populations and the dynamics of resource renewal. The models provide new concepts of multispecies carrying capacity (stock equilibrium) in grazed systems with implications for conservation and management. We conclude that consumer species are not substitutable; therefore, the use of rangeland management concepts such as "livestock units" may be inappropriate.     

Plant-endophyte-herbivore interactions: More than just alkaloids?

A recent paper by Rasmussen et al., (New Phytol 2007; 173:787–97) describes the interactions between Lolium perenne cultivars with contrasting carbohydrate content and the symbiotic fungal endophyte Neotyphodium lolii at different levels of nitrogen supply. In a subsequent study undertaken by Rasmussen et al., (Plant Physiol 2008; 146:1440–53) 66 metabolic variables were analysed in the same material, revealing widespread effects of endophyte infection, N supply and cultivar carbohydrate content on both primary and secondary metabolites. Here, we link insect numerical responses to these metabolic responses using multiple regression analysis.Key words: Neotyphodium lolii, Lolium perenne, high sugar grasses, metabolomics, insect herbivoresPasture grasses are often infected with symbiotic fungal endophytes and benefits for host plants arising out of these associations are generally ascribed to endophyte produced anti-herbivorous alkaloids. We tested the effects of (i) infection with three strains of endophytes differing in their alkaloid profiles, (ii) high vs. low nitrogen (N) supply, and (iii) ryegrass cultivars with high vs. control levels of water soluble carbohydrates (WSCs) on numerical insect responses (aphids, thrips, mites). A difference in WSC content between the cultivars had no significant effect on insect numbers, whereas high N compared to low N supply increased mites, thrips and alate Rhopalosiphum spp., but decreased apterous Rhopalosiphum spp. The effect of endophyte infection was strain dependant and differed for the different insects.A total of 66 metabolic variables of the same plants analysed prior to insect treatment were linked to insect responses using multiple regression analysis. One of the major conclusions to be drawn is that alkaloids are not always the most important factor influencing numerical insect responses which will also be determined by other metabolites, clearly indicating the importance of metabolomics type studies to point the way toward a mechanistic explanation of grass-endophyte-herbivore interactions.Grass species are often hosts of symbiotic clavicipitaceous endophytic fungi¹ residing in the apoplastic spaces of above ground plant parts and usually not causing any visible symptoms of infection.^2–4 These fungal symbionts confer protection from insect herbivory to their host plants through alkaloids,^5–8 some of which (ergovaline, lolitrem B) are also toxic to grazing mammals.^9,10 Natural endophyte strains lacking these mammalian toxins, but still retaining at least some of their insect deterring features, have been commercialized and are now widely used in ryegrass and tall fescue based pastures.^11,12     

Phytosterols and phytosterolemia: gene–diet interactions

Phytosterol intake is recommended as an adjunctive therapy for hypercholesterolemia, and plant sterols/stanols can reduce cholesterol absorption at the intestinal lumen through the Niemann-Pick C1 Like 1 (NPC1L1) transporter pathway by competitive solubilization in mixed micelles. Phytosterol absorption is of less magnitude than cholesterol and is preferably secreted in the intestinal lumen by ABCG5/G8 transporters. Therefore, plasma levels of plant sterols/stanols are negligible compared with cholesterol, under an ordinary diet. The mechanisms of cholesterol and plant sterols absorption and the whole-body pool of sterols are discussed in this chapter. There is controversy about treatment with statins inducing further increase in plasma non-cholesterol sterols raising concerns about the safety of supplementation of plant sterols to such drugs. In addition, increase in plant sterols has also been reported upon consumption of plant sterol-enriched foods, regardless of other treatments. Rare mutations on ABCG5/G8 transporters affecting cholesterol/non-cholesterol extrusion, causing sitosterolemia with xanthomas and premature atheroslerotic disease are now known, and cholesterol/plant sterols absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, emerges as the drug that reduces phytosterolemia and promotes xanthoma regression. On the other hand, common polymorphisms affecting the NPC1L1 transporter can interfere with the action of ezetimibe. Gene-diet interactions participate in this intricate network modulating the expression of genetic variants on specific phenotypes and can also affect the individual response to the hypolipidemic treatment. These very interesting aspects promoted a great deal of research in the field.     

Tudor–dimethylarginine interactions: the condensed version

Biomolecular condensates (BMCs) can facilitate or inhibit diverse cellular functions. BMC formation is driven by noncovalent protein–protein, protein–RNA, and RNA–RNA interactions. Here, we focus on Tudor domain-containing proteins – such as survival motor neuron protein (SMN) – that contribute to BMC formation by binding to dimethylarginine (DMA) modifications on protein ligands. SMN is present in RNA-rich BMCs, and its absence causes spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). SMN’s Tudor domain forms cytoplasmic and nuclear BMCs, but its DMA ligands are largely unknown, highlighting open questions about the function of SMN. Moreover, DMA modification can alter intramolecular interactions and affect protein localization. Despite these emerging functions, the lack of direct methods of DMA detection remains an obstacle to understanding Tudor–DMA interactions in cells.     

Host–microbe interactions: Malassezia and human skin

1. Download : Download high-res image (120KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Plant hormone interactions: how complex are they?

Models describing plant hormone interactions are often complex and web-like. Here we assess several suggested interactions within one experimental system, elongating pea internodes. Results from this system indicate that at least some suggested interactions between auxin, gibberellins (GAs), brassinosteroids (BRs), abscisic acid (ABA) and ethylene do not occur in this system or occur in the reverse direction to that suggested. Furthermore, some of the interactions are relatively weak and may be of little physiological relevance. This is especially true if plant hormones are assumed to show a log-linear response curve as many empirical results suggest. Although there is strong evidence to support some interactions between hormones (e.g. auxin stimulating ethylene and bioactive GA levels), at least some of the web-like complexities do not appear to be justified or are overstated. Simpler and more targeted models may be developed by dissecting out key interactions with major physiological effects.     

Probing RNA–antibiotic interactions: a FTIR study

The crystal structure determination of antibiotic binding sites on the 30S ribosomal subunit and the increasing demand for developing RNA-based drugs has prompted us to study the direct binding of spectinomycin, vancomycin and bleomycin with yeast total RNA using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. We report that the OH of spectinomycin and the peptide group of vancomycin can bind to the bases of RNA, which might depend on Mg²⁺ concentration. Bleomycin on the other hand does not show such a drastic effect on yeast total RNA. This study might help in developing innovative strategies utilizing RNA molecules to perform a variety of essential biological functions.