A summary of second-line randomized studies of aromatase inhibitors

The new generation of selective aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane) offer a significant efficacy and safety advantage over both older agents in this class (aminoglutethimide) and the progestins (megestrol acetate (MA)), as second-line treatment for postmenopausal women with advanced hormone-dependent breast cancer who have failed on tamoxifen therapy. Exemestane, a steroidal aromatase inhibitor, has been shown to have activity after failure with the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole and letrozole, and could be used as third-line treatment. Although the newer aromatase inhibitors belong to the same class and appear, from indirect comparisons, to have similar efficacy compared with the older therapies, they have different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, suggesting the potential for clinical differences. Compared with exemestane and letrozole, anastrozole shows greater selectivity for aromatase, as it lacks any evidence of an effect on adrenal steroidogenesis and has no androgenic effects. Therefore, it is clear that these agents should not be considered to be similar in all respects. In summary, the introduction of the aromatase inhibitors represents a significant step forward in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Studies in the adjuvant setting will ultimately determine whether the differences in pharmacokinetics and phamacodynamics will be of clinical relevance.     

The relationship between aromatase in primary breast tumors and response to treatment with aromatase inhibitors in advanced disease

Aromatase inhibitors are proving to be more effective than tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. Estrogen concentrations in the breast are similar in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, and several fold higher than circulating levels in postmenopausal women. In order to investigate the importance of intratumoral aromatase in stimulating the proliferation of the tumor, we used immunocytochemistry to determine the extent of aromatase expression in relationship to the response of the patient to aromatase inhibitor treatment. The relationship between positive staining for aromatase in the primary tumor and response to treatment with an aromatase inhibitor was investigated in a retrospective study of 102 patients with advanced breast cancer. Immunohistochemical staining using a monoclonal antibody against aromatase was performed on paraffin embedded tumor tissue. Response was evaluated using UICC criteria. Nine out of 13 patients with objective response to treatment stained positive and 49 of 89 patients with stable or progressive disease stained positive. No significant relationship between positive staining and objective response to treatment could be found. When patients with 'clinical benefit' (i.e. objective response plus prolonged stable disease of at least 6 months) were considered, also no relationship could be found. Further analysis of subgroups with positive hormone receptors, treatment with newer generation aromatase inhibitors, single metastatic site, non-visceral metastases and previous treatment only with tamoxifen did not show any relationship. Tumor aromatase expression did not correlate with response of patients with advanced breast cancer to aromatase inhibitor treatment. Most patients had relapsed from other treatments before receiving an aromatase inhibitor. It seems likely that many of these patients had tumors that may have progressed to hormone independence at this stage of the disease. Research in patients who have received treatment with aromatase inhibitors in earlier stages of disease (first line and adjuvant treatment) may provide further information on the relationship between tumor aromatase, steroid receptors and response to inhibitor treatment.     

Where do selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) now fit into breast cancer treatment algorithms?

The agents used for endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer have changed markedly over the past decade. Tamoxifen remains the anti-oestrogen of choice, but could be replaced by the oestrogen receptor down-regulator ICI 182780 or by the fixed ring triphenylethylene arzoxifene (previously SERM III) soon. Whilst aminoglutethimide and 4-OH androstenedione were the aromatase inhibitors of choice, they have been replaced by non-steroidal (anastrozole and letrozole) and steroidal (exemestane) inhibitors of high potency and low side effect profile. Previously, often used treatments such as progestogens (megestrol acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate) and androgens are now rarely used or confined to fourth or fifth line treatments. The LHRH agonist, goserelin, remains the treatment of choice for pre-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer although recent randomised trials indicate a response, time to progression and survival advantage for the combination of goserelin and tamoxifen compared with goserelin alone.

The newer treatments have led to questions concerning the optimum sequence of agents to use in advanced breast cancer and as neo-adjuvant and adjuvant therapy in relation to surgery. Two trials of anastrozole compared with tamoxifen and one trial of letrozole compared with tamoxifen indicate that the new triazole aromatase inhibitors have a significant advantage over the anti-oestrogen with respect to time to progression and survival. Similarly, triazole aromatase inhibitors give faster and more complete responses compared with tamoxifen when used in post-menopausal women before surgery.

Major research questions remain with respect to the aromatase inhibitors used as adjuvant therapy. Anastrozole is being tested alone or in combination with tamoxifen compared with tamoxifen in the ‘so-called’ ATAC trial. Over 9000 patients have been randomised to this important study: the results will be available late-2001. A similar study comparing letrozole and tamoxifen started recently under the auspices of the Breast International Group. Importantly, this trial is also comparing the sequence of tamoxifen followed by letrozole (or vice versa). A similar trial of exemestane given after 2–3 years of tamoxifen compared with 5 years of tamoxifen is recruiting well as is a study comparing letrozole (or placebo) for 5 years after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. These studies may show that aromatase inhibitors are superior to tamoxifen or that a sequence is preferable.

ICI 182780 causes complete oestrogen receptor down-regulation leading to a the lack of agonist activity of the drug. Two trials of ICI 182780 compared with anastrozole for advanced disease will report later this year and a comparison with tamoxifen next year. Arzoxifene (SERM III) is being tested against tamoxifen. These studies are likely to result in new anti-oestrogens being introduced into the clinic.

Most of our endocrine treatments deprived the tumour cell of oestradiol. In vitro experiments with MCF-7 cells indicate that tumour cells can adapt and then grow in response to low oestrogen concentrations in the tissue—culture medium. Importantly, the cells were shown to apoptose in response to high oestrogen concentrations. A recent clinical trial has demonstrated a high response rate to stilboestrol given after a median of four previous oestrogen depriving endocrine therapies. These data and the newer treatments available indicate a need to re-think our general approach to endocrine therapy and endocrine prevention.     

Benefit with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting for postmenopausal women with breast cancer

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors, letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane, have been shown to be effective both as alternatives to tamoxifen in first-line treatment of hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women and following failure of first-line tamoxifen for endocrine therapy. These 3 agents are now being investigated as adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer, as alternative or complementary treatments to the standard, tamoxifen. Three treatment strategies are under investigation: replacement of tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for 5 years (early adjuvant therapy), sequencing of tamoxifen before or after an aromatase inhibitor during the first 5 years (early sequential adjuvant therapy), or following 5 years of tamoxifen (extended adjuvant therapy). In the first adjuvant trial (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination [ATAC]), anastrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in reducing risk of disease recurrence, and recently, the Breast International Group (BIG) trial BIG 1-98 demonstrated the significant superiority of letrozole over tamoxifen in improving disease-free survival. A large trial (International Collaborative Cancer Group [ICCG] trial 96) investigated sequencing of 2 to 3 years of exemestane after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen and found that switching to exemestane was significantly superior in disease-free survival compared with continuing on tamoxifen. The Arimidex or Nolvadex (ARNO) and the small ITA (Italian Tamoxifen Arimidex) trials similarly sequenced anastrozole after tamoxifen and also found that sequencing reduced the hazard of recurrence compared with remaining on tamoxifen. Trial MA.17 evaluated extended adjuvant therapy with letrozole vs placebo following 5 years of tamoxifen. Disease-free survival was significantly improved with letrozole vs placebo, irrespective of whether patients had lymph node-positive or node-negative tumors. All 3 aromatase inhibitors were generally well tolerated. Results of these trials indicate that aromatase inhibitors provide important benefits relative to tamoxifen in each of these adjuvant treatment settings, but the optimal approach still needs to be defined. Other trials continue to investigate some of these adjuvant treatment strategies.     

Inhibition of aromatase: insights from recent studies

Aromatase is the rate limiting enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of androgens to estrogens. Blockade of this step allows treatment of diseases that are dependent upon estrogen. Over the past two decades, highly potent and specific aromatase inhibitors have been developed which block total body aromatization by over 99%. An important recent question is whether aromatase inhibitors are superior to the antiestrogens for treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer. The third generation aromatase inhibitors have been compared to tamoxifen for the treatment of breast cancer in the advanced, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant settings. All of these studies suggest the superiority of aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen. The mechanism responsible for the superiority of the aromatase inhibitors relates to the estrogen agonistic effects of tamoxifen. During exposure to estrogen deprived conditions and to tamoxifen, breast cancer cells adapt and upregulate the MAP kinase and PI-3 kinase pathways. These growth factor signaling pathways potentiate the estrogen agonistic properties of tamoxifen. Data from a large adjuvant therapy trial (ATAC trial) provide evidence that the aromatase inhibitors may also be superior for breast cancer prevention. The mechanism for superiority in this setting probably relates to the genotoxic effects of estradiol metabolites. The aromatase inhibitors may be also useful for the treatment of endometriosis and for ovulation induction as evidenced by preliminary data. The recent advances in development of the aromatase inhibitors clearly demonstrate the utility of these agents for treatment of breast cancer and potentially for other indications.     

Presurgical (neoadjuvant) endocrine therapy is a useful model to predict response and outcome to endocrine treatment in breast cancer patients

Endocrine therapy of breast cancer has been improved continuously during the last decades. Currently, aromatase inhibitors are dominating treatment algorithms for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer while tamoxifen still is the most widely used drug for premenopausal women. Several research tools and study designs have been used to challenge established drugs and develop the field of antihormonal therapy. One pivotal study option has been the observation of clinical responses during presurgical/neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (PSET/NET). This strategy has several major advantages. First, the breast tumor, still present in the patient's breast during therapy, can be followed by clinical observations and radiological measurements and any treatment effect will be immediately registered. Second, tumor biopsies may be obtained before initiation and following therapy allowing intra-patient comparisons. These tumor-biopsies may be used for the evaluation of intra-tumor changes associated with drug treatment. As examples, presurgical breast cancer trials have been used to evaluate intra-tumor estrogen levels during therapy with aromatase inhibitors and also to study mechanisms involved in the adaptation processes to estrogen suppression. Biomarker studies have provided information that may be used for patient selection in the future. Finally, recently published results from presurgical trials testing combinations of classical endocrine drugs and novel targeted therapies have produced promising results.     

Neoadjuvant tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors: comparisons and clinical outcomes

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for oestrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PgR) positive large operable or locally advanced breast cancer is effective and a safe alternative to chemotherapy in postmenopausal women. A randomised trial has demonstrated that the response rate and the incidence and degree of downstaging with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole is significantly greater than with tamoxifen [J. Clin. Oncol. 19 (2001) 3808]. Tumours at all levels of ER appear to respond better to letrozole than tamoxifen but at low levels of ER responses are seen only with letrozole and not with tamoxifen. Patients most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant therapy and those who achieve the greatest reduction in tumour volume are those patients with tumours that express very high levels of ER (ALLRED category score 8). Both letrozole and anastrozole appear effective in both erbB2 positive and negative breast cancers. Three months of treatment is adequate to determine if a tumour will respond. Following breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy, local recurrence rates appear satisfactory.     

Prevention of Bone Loss After Withdrawal of Tamoxifen

ObjectiveTamoxifen has antiestrogenic effects in the breast and estrogenlike activity in the skeletons of post-menopausal women. We hypothesized that post-menopausal women with breast cancer would experience a rapid decline in bone mineral density (BMD) after stopping tamoxifen, similar to that seen with estrogen withdrawal. The objective of this study was to assess, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, whether administration of alendronate (70 mg weekly) would prevent bone loss associated with tamoxifen discontinuation.MethodsPostmenopausal women with breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive alendronate or placebo for 1 year within 3 months after withdrawal of tamoxifen therapy. We initiated a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of alendronate (70 mg weekly) in an effort to prevent bone loss associated with discontinuation of tamoxifen therapy. Patients treated with aromatase inhibitors were excluded from the study. BMD at the spine, hip, and forearm was measured at baseline and at 12 months. Analyses employed repeated-measures analysis of variance.ResultsPatient accrual was considerably limited by the substantial increase in use of aromatase inhibitors during the enrollment period. The study patients (N = 11) had similar baseline BMD T-scores in the alendronate (n = 6) and placebo (n = 5) subgroups. After 1 year, tamoxifen withdrawal was associated with a significant decline in BMD at the femoral neck, which appeared to be prevented by weekly administration of alendronate (-5.2% versus 0.1%; P = .02). Levels of urinary N-telopeptide, a marker of bone turnover, increased by 48% in study subjects in the placebo group (P < .01), whereas weekly alendronate treatment was associated with a 52% decline (P < .01) in this bone resorption marker.ConclusionDifferences in BMD and bone turnover were evident despite the small sample size. These data suggest that postmenopausal women with breast cancer completing tamoxifen therapy warrant an evaluation of their skeletal health and that bisphosphonate therapy may be useful in preventing bone loss associated with discontinuation of tamoxifen. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:162-167)     

Recent progress in development of aromatase inhibitors

In postmenopausal women with breast cancer, aromatase, which is the enzyme converting androstenedione to estrone and testosterone to estradiol, is the rate-limiting step in estrogen biosynthesis. The currently available aromatase inhibitor, aminogluethimide, effectively blocks estrogen production and produces tumor regressions in patients previously treated with tamoxifen. This drug, however, produces frequent side effects and blocks steroidogenic steps other than the aromatase enzyme. Thus, newer aromatase inhibitors with greater potency and specificity are under intense study. More than 20 such compounds have recently been developed. In several clinical trials, 4-hydroxyandrostenedione, given parenterally, has been highly active and specific for aromatase inhibition in patients with breast cancer. In two large recent studies, one-third of heavily pretreated women experienced objective tumor regression with this therapy. CGS 16949A, a newer agent, is also Phase II clinical trials. This compound is an imidazole derivative with nearly 1000-fold greater potency than aminoglutethimide. An initial Phase I study compared the potency of 0.6–16 mg daily in 12 postmenopausal women and found maximal suppression of urinary and plasma estrogens with 2 mg daily. The degree of inhibition was similar to that induced by aminoglutethimide or by surgical adrenalectomy. No CNS, hematologic or biochemical toxicity was observed. A larger Phase II study in 54 patients confirmed this high degree of potency of CGS since a plateau effect was observed at the 1.8, 2 and 4 mg daily doses. The endocrine effects were not absolutely specific as a blunting of ACTH-stimulated but not basal aldosterone levels were observed. This and other emerging aromatase inhibitors offer promise as pharmacologic methods to inhibit estrogen production specifically and without side effects.     

Development and evolution of therapies targeted to the estrogen receptor for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer

This article describes the origins and evolution of "antiestrogenic" medicines for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Developing drugs that target the estrogen receptor (ER) either directly (tamoxifen) or indirectly (aromatase inhibitors) has improved the prognosis of breast cancer and significantly advanced healthcare. The development of the principles for treatment and the success of the concept, in practice, has become a model for molecular medicine and presaged the current testing of numerous targeted therapies for all forms of cancer. The translational research with tamoxifen to target the ER with the appropriate duration (5 years) of adjuvant therapy has contributed to the falling national death rates from breast cancer. Additionally, exploration of the endocrine pharmacology of tamoxifen and related nonsteroidal antiestrogen (e.g. keoxifene now known as raloxifene) resulted in the laboratory recognition of selective ER modulation and the translation of the concept to use raloxifene for the prevention of osteoporosis and breast cancer. However, the extensive evaluation of tamoxifen treatment revealed small but significant side effects such as endometrial cancer, blood clots and the development of acquired resistance. The solution was to develop drugs that targeted the aromatase enzyme specifically to prevent the conversion of androstenedione to estrone and subsequently estradiol. The successful translational research with the suicide inhibitor 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (known as formestane) pioneered the development of a range of oral aromatase inhibitors that are either suicide inhibitors (exemestane) or competitive inhibitors (letrozole and anastrozole) of the aromatase enzyme. Treatment with aromatase inhibitors is proving effective and is associated with reduction in the incidence of endometrial cancer and blood clots when compared with tamoxifen and there is also limited cross resistance so treatment can be sequential. Current clinical trials are addressing the value of aromatase inhibitors as chemopreventive agents for postmenopausal women.     

Aromatase, aromatase inhibitors, and breast cancer

Estrogens are known to be important in the growth of breast cancers in both pre and postmenopausal women. As the number of breast cancer patients increases with age, the majority of breast cancer patients are postmenopausal women. Although estrogens are no longer made in the ovaries after menopause, peripheral tissues produce sufficient concentrations to stimulate tumor growth. As aromatase catalyzes the final and rate-limiting step in the biosynthesis of estrogen, inhibitors of this enzyme are effective targeted therapy for breast cancer. Three aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now FDA approved and have been shown to be more effective than the antiestrogen tamoxifen and are well tolerated. AIs are now a standard treatment for postmenopausal patients. AIs are effective in adjuvant and first-line metastatic setting. This review describes the development of AIs and their current use in breast cancer. Recent research focuses on elucidating mechanisms of acquired resistance that may develop in some patients with long term AI treatment and also in innate resistance. Preclinical data in resistance models demonstrated that the crosstalk between ER and other signaling pathways particularly MAPK and PI3K/Akt is an important resistant mechanism. Blockade of these other signaling pathways is an attractive strategy to circumvent the resistance to AI therapy in breast cancer. Several clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the role of these novel targeted therapies to reverse resistance to AIs. Article from the special issue on 'Targeted Inhibitors'.     

Influence of tamoxifen, aminoglutethimide and goserelin on human plasma IGF-I levels in breast cancer patients

Plasma insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) was measured in breast cancer patients before and during treatment with tamoxifen, goserelin or aminoglutethimide. 24 out of 27 postmenopausal women treated with tamoxifen 20 or 30 mg daily experienced a decrease in plasma IGF-I levels (mean levels before treatment 14.8 nM, during treatment 10.2 nM, P < 0.001). In 8 out of 12 premenopausal breast cancer patients there was a reduction in plasma IGF-I during treatment with goserelin (mean levels before treatment 23.3 nM, during treatment 19.4 nM, P = 0.052). Contrary, 15 out of 17 postmenopausal women treated with the aromatase inhibitor aminoglutethimide had an increase in plasma IGF-I level (mean level before treatment 17.0 nM, during treatment 21.1 nM, P < 0.01). These preliminary results indicate that different forms of endocrine treatment of breast cancer may influence plasma IGF-I levels in different directions.     

Recent advances in the clinical application of aromatase inhibitors

Aromatase inhibitors have evolved over a period of 20 years to well tolerated agents that can effectively obliterate aromatase activity in postmenopausal women. Breast cancer is the predominant clinical application and here the newer agents have established themselves as the preferred second-line agent after tamoxifen in the treatment of advanced disease. Recent data indicate that they be more efficacious than tamoxifen and, therefore, may replace it as the first-line agent of choice in the near future. On-going clinical trials in the adjuvant setting and prospective prevention studies will elucidate whether these drugs have a yet greater role in breast cancer.     

Fatal myocardial infarction in the Scottish adjuvant tamoxifen trial. The Scottish Breast Cancer Committee.

OBJECTIVE--To investigate the incidence of fatal myocardial infarction in women in the two randomised arms of the Scottish adjuvant tamoxifen trial. DESIGN--Retrospective review of hospital notes to determine with the greatest possible certainty women who had died of an acute myocardial infarction. SETTING--Scottish Cancer Trials Office, the University of Edinburgh. PATIENTS--1070 postmenopausal women with operable breast cancer who were randomised to receive either adjuvant tamoxifen for five years or until relapse (539 patients) or tamoxifen for at least six weeks on the confirmation of first recurrence (531 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Incidence of fatal myocardial infarction in women with no known or suspected systemic cancer. RESULTS--Of the 200 women who died in the adjuvant tamoxifen arm of the trial, 44 were free of cancer at death and 10 of these died of myocardial infarction. In the observation arm 251 women died, of whom 61 showed no evidence of systemic cancer and 25 had a fatal myocardial infarction. The incidence of fatal myocardial infarction in the two groups was significantly different (chi 2 = 6.88, p = 0.0087). CONCLUSION--Tamoxifen given for at least five years as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer seems to have a cardioprotective oestrogen-like effect in postmenopausal women.     

Aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapies in patients with breast cancer

There is increasing evidence that endocrine therapy has an important role in patients with oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Several large meta-analyses have reinforced the value of both ovarian ablation and tamoxifen in improving survival. Over the past decade, aromatase inhibitors have become the treatment of choice for second-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer, and the third generation inhibitors have now an established reputation for good patient tolerability. Early studies indicated that aminoglutethimide/hydrocortisone could benefit postmenopausal patients with primary breast cancer, and in 2001, the ATAC study showed that the third generation aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, seemed superior to tamoxifen in that anastrozole-treated patients had a longer disease-free survival. Other studies will report on the relative merits of the steroidal inhibitor exemestane as well as non-steroidal letrozole. The exact duration and sequencing of treatment, together with the long-term effects on bone are at present, unknown.     

The salubrious effect of tamaxifen on serum marker enzymes,glycoproteins, and lysosomal enzymes level in breast cancer women

Tumour markers correlate strongly with prognosis based on tumour burden and surgical resectability. If chemotherapy is extremely effective in certain stage of the disease, the sensitive marker may be of great use in monitoring disease response and drug treatment. Hence, this study was launched to evaluate the changes in tumour marker enzymes like lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), glumate oxaloacetate transaminase (SGOT), glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT), alkaline phosphatase, and acid phosphatase in before and after 3 and 6 months tamoxifen treated breast cancer patients. In addition, the changes in serum glycoproteins viz., hexose, hexosamine, and sialic acid and lysosomal enzymes such as N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, beta-D-galactosidase, and beta-D-glucuronidase were analysed in these patients. These values were compared with their age matched healthy control subjects. At 6 months evaluation, the tamoxifen treated postmenopausal breast cancer women showed a statistically significant decreased (p < 0.001, 0.05 respectively) levels of LDH, SGOT, SGPT, alkaline and acid phosphatases than their baseline values. Similarly, the levels of hexose, hexosamine, and sialic acid and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, beta-D-galactosidase, and beta-D-glucuronidase were decreased significantly (p < 0.001 ) in tamoxifen received postmenopausal women. The result of this study suggested that tamoxifen potentially retard the metastasis of breast cancer as well as the bone demineralisation in postmenopausal breast cancer women. Thus, tamoxifen may also have its antitumour activity through its beneficial effects on tumour marker enzymes and serum proteins in breast cancer women.     

Breast cancer prevention--clinical trials strategies involving aromatase inhibitors

Estrogens and their metabolites have been implicated in both the initiation and the prevention of breast cancer. The reduction in breast cancer incidence seen in the tamoxifen arms of the four prospective trials to date has established the proof of principle that antagonizing estrogen is a potential means of reducing breast cancer risk. However, the areas to improve on these results include: (a) enhanced efficacy, (b) reduction in the incidence of receptor-negative tumors, (c) improved overall and endocrinological side effects, and (d) improved function on end-organs other than the breast. The aromatase inhibitors offer the potential to achieve these goals in part in the following ways: (a) greater reduction in risk of disease as evidenced by superior efficacy in advanced breast cancer and by inhibition of both initiation and promotion of breast cancer, (b) reduction in receptor-negative tumors by synergy with COX-2 inhibitors resulting in growth factor inhibition, anti-angiogenesis and inhibition of tumor-associated aromatase expression, (c) fewer vasomotor and urogenital abnormalities, and (d) reduced thromboembolism and cardiovascular complications and satisfactory effects on bone metabolism. Important differences may exist between non-steroidal reversible inhibitors and steroidal irreversible inactivators in particular related to the androgenic/anabolic effects of the steroidal inactivators. Pilot studies of aromatase inhibitors described elsewhere in this session have begun in healthy women with dense mammography, or a high-risk genetic and/or histocytopathologic profile, to determine potential efficacy, as well as effects on end-organ function. A number of phase three trials with aromatase inhibitors are also underway or in planning. Among these are the BRCA 1 and 2 study of exemestane versus placebo in unaffected postmenopausal carriers, the International Breast Intervention Study 2 (IBIS 2) of anastrozole versus placebo in women with a high-risk profile, and the National Cancer Institute of Canada’s Clinical Trial Group (NCIC CTG) study of exemestane with or without celecoxib versus placebo in women at risk of the disease. For premenopausal women, combination strategies of gonadotrophin agonists and aromatase inhibitors are being investigated. The potential of using low doses of aromatase inhibitors to lower “in breast” estrogen levels without unduly perturbing plasma concentrations is also being explored. The potential of the aromatase gene functioning as an oncogene within the breast may be tied to breast density which in turn may represent both a selection tool for elevated risk and an intermediate marker of prevention. The strong link between postmenopausal estrogen levels and breast cancer risk suggests the possibility that plasma estrogen levels may be a useful intermediate marker of prevention. The aromatase inhibitors offer us the first ever tool to render women virtually free of estrogen and are potentially an exciting tool for the prevention of breast cancer.     

Toremifene-atamestane; alone or in combination: predictions from the preclinical intratumoral aromatase model

Since most breast cancers occur in postmenopausal women and are hormone dependent, we developed a model system that mimics this situation. In this model, tumors of human estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer cells stably transfected with aromatase (Ac-1) are grown in immune-compromised mice. Using this model we have explored a number of therapeutic strategies to maximize the antitumor efficacy of antiestrogens (AEs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs). This intratumoral aromatase xenograft model has proved accurate in predicting the outcome of several clinical trials. In this current study we compared the effect of an AE toremifene and steroidal AI atamestane, alone or in combination, on growth of hormone-dependent human breast cancer. We have also compared toremifene plus atamestane combination with tamoxifen in this study. The growth of Ac-1 cells was inhibited by tamoxifen, toremifene and atamestane in vitro with IC(50) values of 1.8+/-1.3 microM, 1+/-0.3 microM and 60.4+/-17.2 microM, respectively. The combination of toremifene plus atamestane was found to be better than toremifene or atamestane alone in vitro. The effect of this combination was then studied in vivo using Ac-1 xenografts grown in ovariectomized female SCID mice. The mice were injected with toremifene (1000 microg/day), atamestane (1000 microg/day), tamoxifen (100 microg/day), or the combination of toremifene plus atamestane. In this study, our results indicate that the combination of toremifene plus atamestane was as effective as toremifene or tamoxifen alone but may not provide any additional benefit over toremifene alone or tamoxifen alone.     

Adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal hormone-sensitive breast cancer: to start, to switch or to extend?

From the big randomized clinical trials there are evidences that adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone-sensitive early breast cancer in postmenopausal women should include an aromatase inhibitor (AI). Anastrozole or letrozole should be used upfront for 5 years (ATAC and BIG 1-98), the sequential approach of tamoxifen for 2-3 years, followed by anastrozole or exemestane for 2-3 years is a reasonable alternative (ABCSG8, ARNO 95, IES, ITA), and mostly in patients with node-positive disease completing 5 years of tamoxifen should be offered letrozole up to 4-5 years (MA-17). In each of these trials incorporation of an AI resulted in significant improvement in study endpoints. Further results will be needed to establish the optimal beneficial effect, use, duration and safety of adjuvant AI therapies.     

Postmenopausal estrogen synthesis and metabolism: alterations caused by aromatase inhibitors used for the treatment of breast cancer

Inhibition of postmenopausal estrogen production by aromatase inhibitors is an established drug treatment modality for postmenopausal breast cancer. In this article postmenopausal estrogen disposition and the alterations caused by treatment with aromatase inhibitors are reviewed. Recent investigations have challenged the hypothesis that aromatization of androstenedione into estrone is the sole production pathway for estrogens in postmenopausal women. The finding that estrogens persist in the plasma of patients receiving aminoglutethimide treatment despite a near total inhibition of the aromatase enzyme suggests that alternative pathways for estrogen synthesis exist. While nonspecific actions of aromatase inhibitors may be disadvantageous, certain effects may also be beneficial. Recent findings that aminoglutethimide may induce estrone sulfate metabolism questions whether this "prototype" aromatase inhibitor might have a dual mechanism of action. The importance of investigating the possible influence of different aromatase inhibitors on all components of estrogen disposition is considered.