Chromatin rearrangements during nucleotide excision repair

The removal of DNA damage from the eukaryotic genome requires DNA repair enzymes to operate within the complex environment of chromatin. We review the evidence for chromatin rearrangements during nucleotide excision repair and discuss the extent and possible molecular mechanisms of these rearrangements, focusing on events at the nucleosome level of chromatin structure.     

The eukaryotic nucleotide excision repair pathway

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the most versatile mechanism of DNA repair, recognizing and dealing with a variety of helix-distorting lesions, such as the UV-induced photoproducts cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and pyrimidine 6-4 pyrimidone photoproducts (6-4 PPs). In this review, we describe the main protein players and the different sequential steps of the eukaryotic NER mechanism in human cells, from lesion recognition to damage removal and DNA synthesis. Studies on the dynamics of protein access to the damaged site, and the kinetics of lesion removal contribute to the knowledge of how the cells respond to genetic insult. DNA lesions as well as NER factors themselves are also implicated in changes in cell metabolism, influencing cell cycle progression or arrest, apoptosis and genetic instability. These changes are related to increased mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Finally, the recent collection of genomic data allows one to recognize the high conservation and the evolution of eukaryotic NER. The distribution of NER orthologues in different organisms, from archaea to the metazoa, displays challenging observations. Some of NER proteins are widespread in nature, probably representing ancient DNA repair proteins, which are candidates to participate in a primitive NER mechanism.     

Ribonucleotides as nucleotide excision repair substrates

The incorporation of ribonucleotides in DNA has attracted considerable notice in recent years, since the pool of ribonucleotides can exceed that of the deoxyribonucleotides by at least 10–20-fold, and single ribonucleotide incorporation by DNA polymerases appears to be a common event. Moreover ribonucleotides are potentially mutagenic and lead to genome instability. As a consequence, errantly incorporated ribonucleotides are rapidly repaired in a process dependent upon RNase H enzymes. On the other hand, global genomic nucleotide excision repair (NER) in prokaryotes and eukaryotes removes damage caused by covalent modifications that typically distort and destabilize DNA through the production of lesions derived from bulky chemical carcinogens, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolites, or via crosslinking. However, a recent study challenges this lesion-recognition paradigm. The work of Vaisman et al. (2013) [34] reveals that even a single ribonucleotide embedded in a deoxyribonucleotide duplex is recognized by the bacterial NER machinery in vitro. In their report, the authors show that spontaneous mutagenesis promoted by a steric-gate pol V mutant increases in uvrA, uvrB, or uvrC strains lacking rnhB (encoding RNase HII) and to a greater extent in an NER-deficient strain lacking both RNase HI and RNase HII. Using purified UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC proteins in in vitro assays they show that despite causing little distortion, a single ribonucleotide embedded in a DNA duplex is recognized and doubly-incised by the NER complex. We present the hypothesis to explain the recognition and/or verification of this small lesion, that the critical 2′-OH of the ribonucleotide – with its unique electrostatic and hydrogen bonding properties – may act as a signal through interactions with amino acid residues of the prokaryotic NER complex that are not possible with DNA. Such a mechanism might also be relevant if it were demonstrated that the eukaryotic NER machinery likewise incises an embedded ribonucleotide in DNA.     

Base flipping in nucleotide excision repair

UvrB, the ultimate damage-binding protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair is capable of binding a vast array of structurally unrelated lesions. A beta-hairpin structure in the protein plays an important role in damage-specific binding. In this paper we have monitored DNA conformational alterations in the UvrB-DNA complex, using the fluorescent adenine analogue 2-aminopurine. We show that binding of UvrB to a DNA fragment with cholesterol damage moves the base adjacent to the lesion at the 3' side into an extrahelical position. This extrahelical base is not accessible for acrylamide quenching, suggesting that it inserts into a pocket of the UvrB protein. Also the base opposite this flipped base is extruded from the DNA helix. The degree of solvent exposure of both residues varies with the type of cofactor (ADP/ATP) bound by UvrB. Fluorescence of the base adjacent to the damage is higher when UvrB is in the ADP-bound configuration, but concomitantly this UvrB-DNA complex is less stable. In the ATP-bound form the UvrB-DNA complex is very stable and in this configuration the base in the non-damaged strand is more exposed. Hairpin residue Tyr-95 is specifically involved in base flipping in the non-damaged strand. We present evidence that this conformational change in the non-damaged strand is important for 3' incision by UvrC.     

17 beta-Oestradiol attenuates nucleotide excision repair

Epidemiological studies strongly suggest associations between chronic exposure to endogenous oestrogens and the development of breast and gynaecological tumours. Two mechanisms by which 17 beta-oestradiol (E2) may enhance tumorigenesis are: (i) enhancement of cell proliferation and (ii) the production of reactive, genotoxic metabolites. Here we suggest an additional mechanism, inhibition of DNA repair. The removal of UV-induced thymine dimers from human keratinocytes, reflective of nucleotide excision repair, was significantly attenuated by treatment of cells with E2. In contrast, treatment with 17 alpha-oestradiol had no effect. Mechanisms are proposed for this effect of E2, which may contribute to its carcinogenic potential.     

Nitric oxide inhibits DNA-adduct excision in nucleotide excision repair

Sustained induction of nitric oxide (NO) in chronic inflammation may be mutagenic, through DNA damage induction and/or DNA repair inhibition. Although there is good evidence that NO can cause DNA damage, how NO is involved in DNA repair remains elusive. By using DNA synthesis inhibitors to accumulate DNA strand breaks in comet assay, we show that NO and peroxynitrite inhibit DNA-adduct excision in human fibroblasts damaged by UVC, 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, benzo[a]pyrene dihydrodiol epoxide, cisplatin, or mitomycin C, but not with methyl methane sulfonate. Treating cells with arsenite increased NO production and also inhibited the DNA-adduct excision induced by UVC, 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, benzo[a]pyrene dihydrodiol epoxide, cisplatin, and mitomycin C, but not by methyl methane sulfonate, H(2)O(2), sodium nitrosoprusside, or 3-morpholinosydnonimine. Arsenite inhibition of DNA-adduct excision was decreased by NO synthase inhibitors and NO scavengers. The nuclear extract prepared from fibroblasts pretreated with sodium nitrosoprusside, dipropylenetriamine NONOate, 3-morpholinosydnonimine, or arsenite also showed decreased activity in excising the DNA adducts induced by UVC and cisplatin but not by methyl methane sulfonate or H(2)O(2) plus Fe. These results are consistent with the notion that NO, peroxynitrite, and arsenite inhibit the DNA-adduct excision in nucleotide excision repair but not that in base excision repair.     

Regulation of nucleotide excision repair through ubiquitination

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the most versatile DNA-repair pathway in all organisms. While bacteria require only three proteins to complete the incision step of NER, eukaryotes employ about 30 proteins to complete the same step. Here we summarize recent studies demonstrating that ubiquitination, a post-translational modification, plays critical roles in regulating the NER activity either dependent on or independent of ubiquitin-proteolysis. Several NER components have been shown as targets of ubiquitination while others are actively involved in the ubiquitination process. We argue through this analysis that ubiquitination serves to coordinate various steps of NER and meanwhile connect NER with other related pathways to achieve the efficient global DNA-damage response.     

Protein complexes in nucleotide excision repair.

The main pathway by which mammalian cells remove DNA damage caused by UV light and some other mutagens is nucleotide excision repair (NER). The best characterised components of the human NER process are those proteins defective in the inherited disorder xeroderma pigmentosum (XP). The proteins known to be involved in the first steps of the NER reaction (damage recognition and incision-excision) are heterotrimeric RPA, XPA, the 6 to 9 subunit TFIIH, XPC-hHR23B, XPG, and ERCC1-XPF. Many interactions between these proteins have been found in recent years using different methods both in mammalian cells and for the homologous proteins in yeast. There are virtually no quantitative measurements of the relative strengths of these interactions. Higher order associations between these proteins in solution and even the existence of a complete "repairosome" complex have been reported, which would have implications both for the mechanism of repair and for the interplay between NER and other cellular processes. Nevertheless, evidence for a completely pre-assembled functional repairosome in solution is inconclusive and the order of action of repair factors on damaged DNA is uncertain.     

Damage recognition in nucleotide excision DNA repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a highly versatile DNA repair process. Its ability to repair a large number of different damages with the same subset of recognition factors requires structural tools for damage recognition that are both broad and very accurate. Over the past few years detailed structural information on damage recognition factors from eukaryotic and prokaryotic NER has emerged. These structures shed light on the toolkit utilized in the damage recognition process and help explain the broad substrate specificity of NER.     

Initiation and bidirectional propagation of chromatin assembly from a target site for nucleotide excision repair.

To restore full genomic integrity in a eukaryotic cell, DNA repair processes have to be coordinated with the resetting of nucleosomal organization. We have established a cell-free system using Drosophila embryo extracts to investigate the mechanism linking de novo nucleosome formation to nucleotide excision repair (NER). Closed-circular DNA containing a uniquely placed cisplatin-DNA adduct was used to follow chromatin assembly specifically from a site of NER. Nucleosome formation was initiated from a target site for NER. The assembly of nucleosomes propagated bidirectionally, creating a regular nucleosomal array extending beyond the initiation site. Furthermore, this chromatin assembly was still effective when the repair synthesis step in the NER process was inhibited.     

Damage recognition in nucleotide excision repair of DNA

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is found throughout nature, in eubacteria, eukaryotes and archaea. In human cells it is the main pathway for the removal of damage caused by UV light, but it also acts on a wide variety of other bulky helix-distorting lesions caused by chemical mutagens. An ongoing challenge is to understand how a site of DNA damage is located during NER and distinguished from non-damaged sites. This article reviews information on damage recognition in mammalian cells and the bacterium Escherichia coli. In mammalian cells the XPC-hHR23B, XPA, RPA and TFIIH factors may all have a role in damage recognition. XPC-hHR23B has the strongest affinity for damaged DNA in some assays, as does the similar budding yeast complex Rad4-Rad23. There is current discussion as to whether XPC or XPA acts first in the repair process to recognise damage or distortions. TFIIH may play a role in distinguishing the damaged strand from the non-damaged one, if translocation along a DNA strand by the TFIIH DNA helicases is interrupted by encountering a lesion. The recognition and incision steps of human NER use 15 to 18 polypeptides, whereas E. coli requires only three proteins to obtain a similar result. Despite this, many remarkable similarities in the NER mechanism have emerged between eukaryotes and bacteria. These include use of a distortion-recognition factor, a strand separating helicase to create an open preincision complex, participation of structure-specific endonucleases and the lack of a need for certain factors when a region containing damage is already sufficiently distorted.     

Mathematical modeling of mitochondrial adenine nucleotide translocase

We have developed a mathematical model of adenine nucleotide translocase (ANT) function on the basis of the structural and kinetic properties of the transporter. The model takes into account the effect of membrane potential, pH, and magnesium concentration on ATP and ADP exchange velocity. The parameters of the model have been estimated from experimental data. A satisfactory model should take into account the influence of the electric potential difference on both ternary complex formation and translocation processes. To describe the dependence of translocation constants on electric potential we have supposed that ANT molecules carry charged groups. These groups are shifted during the translocation. Using the model we have evaluated the translocator efficiency and predicted the behavior of ANT under physiological conditions.     

Local action of the chromatin assembly factor CAF-1 at sites of nucleotide excision repair in vivo

DNA damage and its repair can cause both local and global rearrangements of chromatin structure. In each case, the epigenetic information contained within this structure must be maintained. Using the recently developed method for the localized UV irradiation of cells, we analysed responses that occur locally to damage sites and global events triggered by local damage recognition. We thus demonstrate that, within a single cell, the recruitment of chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1) to UV-induced DNA damage is a strictly local phenomenon, restricted to damage sites. Concomitantly, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) locates to the same sites. This localized recruitment suggests that CAF-1 participates directly in chromatin structural rearrangements that occur in the vicinity of the damage. Use of nucleotide excision repair (NER)-deficient cells shows that the NER pathway--specifically dual incision--is required for recruitment of CAF-1 and PCNA. This in vivo demonstration of the local role of CAF-1, depending directly on NER, supports the hypothesis that CAF-1 ensures the maintenance of epigenetic information by acting locally at repair sites.