The role of the extracellular loops of the CGRP receptor, a family B GPCR

The CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide) receptor is a family B GPCR (G-protein-coupled receptor). It consists of a GPCR, CLR (calcitonin receptor-like receptor) and an accessory protein, RAMP1 (receptor activity-modifying protein 1). RAMP1 is needed for CGRP binding and also cell-surface expression of CLR. There have been few systematic studies of the ECLs (extracellular loops) of family B GPCRs. However, they are likely to be especially important for the interaction of the N-termini of the peptide agonists that are the natural agonists for these receptors. We have carried out alanine scans on all three ECLs of CLR, as well as their associated juxtamembrane regions. Residues within all three loops influence CGRP binding and receptor activation. Mutation of Ala203 and Ala206 on ECL1 to leucine increased the affinity of CGRP. Residues at the top of TM (transmembrane) helices 2 and 3 influenced CGRP binding and receptor activation. L351A and E357A in TM6/ECL3 reduced receptor expression and may be needed for CLR association with RAMP1. ECL2 seems especially important for CLR function; of the 16 residues so far examined in this loop, eight residues reduce the potency of CGRP at stimulating cAMP production when mutated to alanine.     

Role of the transmembrane domain 4/extracellular loop 2 junction of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor in ligand binding and receptor conformational selection

Recent crystal structures of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) show the remarkable structural diversity of extracellular loop 2 (ECL2), implying its potential role in ligand binding and ligand-induced receptor conformational selectivity. Here we have applied molecular modeling and mutagenesis studies to the TM4/ECL2 junction (residues Pro(174(4.59))-Met(180(4.66))) of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor, which uniquely has one functional type of receptor but two endogenous ligands in humans. We suggest that the above residues assume an α-helical extension of TM4 in which the side chains of Gln(174(4.60)) and Phe(178(4.64)) face toward the central ligand binding pocket to make H-bond and aromatic contacts with pGlu(1) and Trp(3) of both GnRH I and GnRH II, respectively. The interaction between the side chains of Phe(178(4.64)) of the receptor and Trp(3) of the GnRHs was supported by reciprocal mutations of the interacting residues. Interestingly, alanine mutations of Leu(175(4.61)), Ile(177(4.63)), and Met(180(4.66)) decreased mutant receptor affinity for GnRH I but, in contrast, increased affinity for GnRH II. This suggests that these residues make intramolecular or intermolecular contacts with residues of transmembrane (TM) domain 3, TM5, or the phospholipid bilayer, which couple the ligand structure to specific receptor conformational switches. The marked decrease in signaling efficacy of I177A and F178A also indicates that IIe(177(4.63)) and Phe(178(4.64)) are important in stabilizing receptor-active conformations. These findings suggest that the TM4/ECL2 junction is crucial for peptide ligand binding and, consequently, for ligand-induced receptor conformational selection.     

Structure-function analysis of helix 8 of human calcitonin receptor-like receptor within the adrenomedullin 1 receptor

Adrenomedullin 1 (AM₁) receptor is a heterodimer composed of calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) - a family B G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) - and receptor activity-modifying protein 2 (RAMP2). Both family A and family B GPCRs possess an eighth helix (helix 8) in the proximal portion of their C-terminal tails; however, little is known about the function of helix 8 in family B GPCRs. We therefore investigated the structure-function relationship of human (h)CLR helix 8, which extends from Glu430 to Trp439, by separately transfecting nine point mutants into HEK-293 cells stably expressing hRAMP2. Glu430, Val431, Arg437 and Trp439 are all conserved among family B GPCRs. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that Arg437Ala or Trp438Ala mutation significantly reduced cell surface expression of the receptor complex, leading to a ∼20% reduction in specific ¹²⁵I-AM binding but little change in their IC₅₀ values. Both mutants showed 6-8-fold higher EC₅₀ values for AM-induced cAMP production and ∼50% reductions in their maximum responses. Glu430Ala mutation also reduced AM signaling by ∼45%, but surface expression and ¹²⁵I-AM binding were nearly the same as with wild-type CLR. Surprisingly, Glu430Ala and Val431Ala mutations significantly enhanced AM-induced internalization of the mutant receptor complexes. Taken together, these findings suggest that within hCLR helix 8, Glu430 is crucial for Gs coupling, and Arg437 and Trp439 are involved in both cell surface expression of the hAM₁ receptor and Gs coupling. Moreover, the Glu430-Val431 sequence may participate in the negative regulation of hAM₁ receptor internalization, which is not dependent on Gs coupling.     

Functional analysis of transmembrane domain 2 of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

Ala substitution scanning mutagenesis has been used to probe the functional role of amino acids in transmembrane (TM) domain 2 of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, and of the highly conserved Asn43 in TM1. The mutation of Asn43, Asn61, and Leu64 caused an enhanced ACh affinity phenotype. Interpreted using a rhodopsin-based homology model, these results suggest the presence of a network of specific contacts between this group of residues and Pro415 and Tyr418 in the highly conserved NPXXY motif in TM7 that exhibit a similar mutagenic phenotype. These contacts may be rearranged or broken when ACh binds. D71A, like N414A, was devoid of signaling activity. We suggest that formation of a direct hydrogen bond between the highly conserved side chains of Asp71 and Asn414 may be a critical feature stabilizing the activated state of the M1 receptor. Mutation of Leu67, Ala70, and Ile74 also reduced the signaling efficacy of the ACh-receptor complex. The side chains of these residues are modeled as an extended surface that may help to orient and insulate the proposed hydrogen bond between Asp71 and Asn414. Mutation of Leu72, Gly75, and Met79 in the outer half of TM2 primarily reduced the expression of functional receptor binding sites. These residues may mediate contacts with TM1 and TM7 that are preserved throughout the receptor activation cycle. Thermal inactivation measurements confirmed that a reduction in structural stability followed the mutation of Met79 as well as Asp71.     

Charged extracellular residues, conserved throughout a G-protein-coupled receptor family, are required for ligand binding, receptor activation, and cell-surface expression

For G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in general, the roles of extracellular residues are not well defined compared with residues in transmembrane helices (TMs). Nevertheless, extracellular residues are important for various functions in both peptide-GPCRs and amine-GPCRs. In this study, the V(1a) vasopressin receptor was used to systematically investigate the role of extracellular charged residues that are highly conserved throughout a subfamily of peptide-GPCRs, using a combination of mutagenesis and molecular modeling. Of the 13 conserved charged residues identified in the extracellular loops (ECLs), Arg(116) (ECL1), Arg(125) (top of TMIII), and Asp(204) (ECL2) are important for agonist binding and/or receptor activation. Molecular modeling revealed that Arg(125) (and Lys(125)) stabilizes TMIII by interacting with lipid head groups. Charge reversal (Asp(125)) caused re-ordering of the lipids, altered helical packing, and increased solvent penetration of the TM bundle. Interestingly, a negative charge is excluded at this locus in peptide-GPCRs, whereas a positive charge is excluded in amine-GPCRs. This contrasting conserved charge may reflect differences in GPCR binding modes between peptides and amines, with amines needing to access a binding site crevice within the receptor TM bundle, whereas the binding site of peptide-GPCRs includes more extracellular domains. A conserved negative charge at residue 204 (ECL2), juxtaposed to the highly conserved disulfide bond, was essential for agonist binding and signaling. Asp(204) (and Glu(204)) establishes TMIII contacts required for maintaining the beta-hairpin fold of ECL2, which if broken (Ala(204) or Arg(204)) resulted in ECL2 unfolding and receptor dysfunction. This study provides mechanistic insight into the roles of conserved extracellular residues.     

Selective CGRP and adrenomedullin peptide binding by tethered RAMP‐calcitonin receptor‐like receptor extracellular domain fusion proteins

Calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) and adrenomedullin (AM) are related peptides that are potent vasodilators. The CGRP and AM receptors are heteromeric protein complexes comprised of a shared calcitonin receptor‐like receptor (CLR) subunit and a variable receptor activity modifying protein (RAMP) subunit. RAMP1 enables CGRP binding whereas RAMP2 confers AM specificity. How RAMPs determine peptide selectivity is unclear and the receptor stoichiometries are a topic of debate with evidence for 1:1, 2:2, and 2:1 CLR:RAMP stoichiometries. Here, we describe bacterial production of recombinant tethered RAMP‐CLR extracellular domain (ECD) fusion proteins and biochemical characterization of their peptide binding properties. Tethering the two ECDs ensures complex stability and enforces defined stoichiometry. The RAMP1‐CLR ECD fusion purified as a monomer, whereas the RAMP2‐CLR ECD fusion purified as a dimer. Both proteins selectively bound their respective peptides with affinities in the low micromolar range. Truncated CGRP(27‐37) and AM(37‐52) fragments were identified as the minimal ECD complex binding regions. The CGRP C‐terminal amide group contributed to, but was not required for, ECD binding, whereas the AM C‐terminal amide group was essential for ECD binding. Alanine‐scan experiments identified CGRP residues T30, V32, and F37 and AM residues P43, K46, I47, and Y52 as critical for ECD binding. Our results identify CGRP and AM determinants for receptor ECD complex binding and suggest that the CGRP receptor functions as a 1:1 heterodimer. In contrast, the AM receptor may function as a 2:2 dimer of heterodimers, although our results cannot rule out 2:1 or 1:1 stoichiometries.     

A Single Conserved Leucine Residue on the First Intracellular Loop Regulates ER Export of G Protein‐Coupled Receptors

The intrinsic structural determinants for export trafficking of G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been mainly identified in the termini of the receptors. In this report, we determined the role of the first intracellular loop (ICL1) in the transport from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the cell surface of GPCRs. The α_2B‐adrenergic receptor (AR) mutant lacking the ICL1 is unable to traffic to the cell surface and to initiate signaling measured as ERK1/2 activation. Mutagenesis studies identify a single Leu48 residue in the ICL1 modulates α_2B‐AR export from the ER. The ER export function of the Leu48 residue can be substituted by Phe, but not Ile, Val, Tyr and Trp, and is unlikely involved in correct folding or dimerization of α_2B‐AR in the ER. Importantly, the isolated Leu residue is remarkably conserved in the center of the ICL1s among the family A GPCRs and is also required for the export to the cell surface of β₂‐AR, α_1B‐AR and angiotensin II type 1 receptor. These data indicate a crucial role for a single Leu residue within the ICL1 in ER export of GPCRs.     

Expression and function of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor are dependent on a conserved apolar amino acid in the third intracellular loop

The coupling of agonist-activated heptahelical receptors to their cognate G proteins is often dependent on the amino-terminal region of the third intracellular loop. Like many G protein-coupled receptors, the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor contains an apolar amino acid in this region at a constant distance from conserved Pro and Tyr/Asn residues in the fifth transmembrane domain (TM V). An analysis of the role of this conserved residue (Leu(237)) in GnRH receptor function revealed that the binding affinities of the L237I and L237V mutant receptors were unchanged, but their abilities to mediate GnRH-induced inositol phosphate signaling, G protein coupling, and agonist-induced internalization were significantly impaired. Receptor expression at the cell surface was reduced by replacement of Leu(237) with Val, and abolished by replacement with Ala, Arg, or Asp residues. These results are consistent with molecular modeling of the TM V and VI regions of the GnRH receptor, which predicts that Leu(237) is caged by several apolar amino acids (Ile(233), Ile(234), and Val(240) in TM V, and Leu(262), Leu(265), and Val(269) in TM VI) to form a tight hydrophobic cluster. These findings indicate that the conserved apolar residue (Leu(237)) in the third intracellular loop is an important determinant of GnRH receptor expression and activation, and possibly that of other G protein-coupled receptors.     

The role of leucine and isoleucine in tuning the hydropathy of class A GPCRs

Leucine and Isoleucine are two amino acids that differ only by the positioning of one methyl group. This small difference can have important consequences in α-helices, as the β-branching of Ile results in helix destabilization. We set out to investigate whether there are general trends for the occurrences of Leu and Ile residues in the structures and sequences of class A GPCRs (G protein-coupled receptors). GPCRs are integral membrane proteins in which α-helices span the plasma membrane seven times and which play a crucial role in signal transmission. We found that Leu side chains are generally more exposed at the protein surface than Ile side chains. We explored whether this difference might be attributed to different functions of the two amino acids and tested if Leu tunes the hydrophobicity of the transmembrane domain based on the Wimley-White whole-residue hydrophobicity scales. Leu content decreases the variation in hydropathy between receptors and correlates with the non-Leu receptor hydropathy. Both measures indicate that hydropathy is tuned by Leu. To test this idea further, we generated protein sequences with random amino acid compositions using a simple numerical model, in which hydropathy was tuned by adjusting the number of Leu residues. The model was able to replicate the observations made with class A GPCR sequences. We speculate that the hydropathy of transmembrane domains of class A GPCRs is tuned by Leu (and to some lesser degree by Lys and Val) to facilitate correct insertion into membranes and/or to stably anchor the receptors within membranes.     

Follicle-stimulating hormone interacts with exoloop 3 of the receptor

The human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor consists of two distinct domains of approximately 330 amino acids, the N-terminal extracellular exodomain and membrane-associated endodomain including three exoloops and seven transmembrane helices. The exodomain binds the hormone with high affinity, and the resulting hormone/exodomain complex modulates the endodomain where receptor activation occurs. It has been an enigma whether the hormone interacts with the endodomain. In a step to address the question, exoloop 3 of (580)KVPLITVSKAK(590) was examined by Ala scan, multiple substitution, assays for hormone binding, cAMP and inositol phosphate (IP) induction, and photoaffinity labeling. We present the evidence for the interaction of FSH and exoloop 3. A peptide mimic of exoloop 3 specifically and saturably photoaffinity-labels FSH alpha but not FSH beta. This is in contrast to photoaffinity labeling of FSH beta by the peptide mimic of the N-terminal region of the receptor. Leu(583) and Ile(584) are crucial for the interaction of FSH and exoloop 3. Substitutions of these two residues enhanced the hormone binding affinity. This is due to the loss of the original side chains but not the introduction of new side chains. The Leu(583) and Ile(584) side chains appear to project in opposite directions. Ile(584) appears to be so specific and to require flexibility and stereo specificity so that no other amino acids can fit into its place. Leu(583) is less specific. The improvement in hormone binding by substitutions was offset by the severe impairment of signal generation of cAMP and/or inositol phosphate. For example, the Phe or Tyr substitution of Leu(583) improved the hormone binding and cAMP induction but impaired IP induction. On the other hand, the substitutions for Ile(584) and Lys(590) abolished the cAMP and IP induction. Our results open a logical question whether Leu(583), Ile(584), and Lys(590) interact with the exodomain and/or the hormone. The answers will provide new insights into the mechanisms of hormone binding and signal generation.     

Identification of secretin,vasoactive intestinal peptide and glucagon binding sites: from chimaeric receptors to point mutations

We have identified two basic residues that are important for the recognition of secretin and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) by their respective receptors. These two peptides containing an Asp residue at position 3 interacted with an arginine residue in transmembrane helix 2 (TM2) of the receptor, and the lysine residue in extracellular loop 1 (ECL1) stabilized the active receptor conformation induced by the ligand. The glucagon receptor possesses a Lys instead of an Arg in TM2, and an Ile instead of Lys in ECL1; it markedly prefers a Gln side chain in position 3 of the ligand. Our results suggested that, in the wild-type receptor, the Ile side chain prevented access to the TM2 Lys side chain, but oriented the glucagon Gln(3) side chain to its proper binding site. In the double mutant, the ECL1 Lys allowed an interaction between negatively charged residues in position 3 of glucagon and the TM2 Arg, resulting in efficient receptor activation by [Asp(3)]glucagon as well as by glucagon.     

Elucidation of the role of peptide linker in calcium-sensing receptor activation process

Family 3 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which includes metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), sweet and "umami" taste receptors (T1Rs), and the extracellular calcium-sensing receptor (CaR), represent a distinct group among the superfamily of GPCRs characterized by large amino-terminal extracellular ligand-binding domains (ECD) with homology to bacterial periplasmic amino acid-binding proteins that are responsible for signal detection and receptor activation through as yet unresolved mechanism(s) via the seven-transmembrane helical domain (7TMD) common to all GPCRs. To address the mechanism(s) by which ligand-induced conformational changes are conveyed from the ECD to the 7TMD for G-protein activation, we altered the length and composition of a 14-amino acid linker segment common to all family 3 GPCRs except GABA(B) receptor, in the CaR by insertion, deletion, and site-directed mutagenesis of specific highly conserved residues. Small alterations in the length and composition of the linker impaired cell surface expression and abrogated signaling of the chimeric receptors. The exchange of nine amino acids within the linker of CaR with the homologous sequence of mGluR1, however, preserved receptor function. Ala substitution for the four highly conserved residues within this amino acid sequence identified a Leu at position 606 of the CaR critical for cell surface expression and signaling. Substitution of Leu(606) for Ala resulted in impaired cell surface expression. However, Ile and Val substitutions displayed strong activating phenotypes. Disruption of the linker by insertion of nine amino acids of a random-coiled structure uncoupled the ECD from regulating the 7TMD. These data are consistent with a model of receptor activation in which the peptide linker, and particularly Leu(606), provides a critical interaction for the CaR signal transmission, a finding likely to be relevant for all family 3 GPCRs containing this conserved motif.     

Aspartate(69) of the calcitonin-like receptor is required for its functional expression together with receptor-activity-modifying proteins 1 and -2

The calcitonin-like receptor (CLR) associated with receptor-activity-modifying proteins (RAMP) 1 or -2 recognizes calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and adrenomedullin (AM), respectively. The amino acid sequence CNRTWDGWLCW corresponding to residues 64-74 in the extracellular N-terminus of the CLR is conserved. The Asp(69) (D(69)) is present in all family B1 G-protein-coupled receptors. Here the D(69) of a V5-tagged mouse CLR has been mutated to Ala (A), Glu (E), and Asn (N). The function of the intact and the mutant CLR was investigated in COS-7 cells coexpressing myc-tagged mouse RAMP1 or -2. In CLR/RAMP1 and -2 expressing cells CGRP and AM stimulated cAMP formation with an EC(50) of 0.17 and 0.50 nM, respectively. The expression of the D69A, D69E, and D69N mutants at the cell surface was comparable to that of the intact CLR. cAMP stimulation by CGRP and AM was abolished in the D69A mutant. With the D69E mutant the EC(50) of CGRP and AM were 1000-fold higher than those with the intact CLR. With the D69N mutant the EC(50) of CGRP was 0.48 nM and that of AM 0.44 nM, but the maximal cAMP formation was reduced to 24% and to 12% of cells with the intact CLR. Co-immunoprecipitation of RAMP1 with the CLR, indicating complex formation, was reduced with the D69A, D69N, and D69E mutants. RAMP2 co-precipitated with the mutant receptors indistinguishable from the intact CLR. In conclusion, mutation of D69 to N, E or A in the CLR did not affect its expression at the cell surface, but impaired or abolished the CGRP and AM receptor function in the presence of RAMP1 and -2, respectively.     

The rat adenine receptor: pharmacological characterization and mutagenesis studies to investigate its putative ligand binding site

The rat adenine receptor (rAdeR) was the first member of a family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) activated by adenine and designated as P0-purine receptors. The present study aimed at gaining insights into structural aspects of ligand binding and function of the rAdeR. We exchanged amino acid residues predicted to be involved in ligand binding (Phe110^3.24, Asn115^3.29, Asn173^4.60, Phe179^45.39, Asn194^5.40, Phe195^5.41, Leu201^5.47, His252^6.54, and Tyr268^7.32) for alanine and expressed them in Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) insect cells. Membrane preparations subjected to [³H]adenine binding studies revealed only minor effects indicating that none of the exchanged amino acids is part of the ligand binding pocket, at least in the inactive state of the receptor. Furthermore, we coexpressed the rAdeR and its mutants with mammalian G_i proteins in Sf9 insect cells to probe receptor activation. Two amino acid residues, Asn194^5.40 and Leu201^5.47, were found to be crucial for activation since their alanine mutants did not respond to adenine. Moreover we showed that—in contrast to most other rhodopsin-like GPCRs—the rAdeR does not contain essential disulfide bonds since preincubation with dithiothreitol neither altered adenine binding in Sf9 cell membranes, nor adenine-induced inhibition of adenylate cyclase in 1321N1 astrocytoma cells transfected with the rAdeR. To detect rAdeRs by Western blot analysis, we developed a specific antibody. Finally, we were able to show that the extended N-terminal sequence of the rAdeR constitutes a putative signal peptide of unknown function that is cleaved off in the mature receptor. Our results provide important insights into this new, poorly investigated family of purinergic receptors.     

Molecular dynamics-based investigation of InhA substrate binding loop for diverse biological activity of direct InhA inhibitors

The closed conformation of substrate binding loop (SBL) is considered significant for biological activity of direct InhA inhibitors (DIIs). However, exact interactions of SBL with inhibitors are not characterized yet to emphasize over SBL conformations. The seven InhA-DII complexes are analyzed using molecular dynamics simulation to deduce the mechanism for closed and open conformation of SBL. MMGBSA binding energy calculations and decompositions help to identify Ala198, Met199, Ile202, Val203, Ile215, and Leu218 in SBL region as the key residues. The interactions of DIIs with SBL residues particularly Ile202, Val203, Ile215, and Leu218 are found considerable for closed SBL conformation. This difference is accounted for closed state of SBL in 2X23, and open/moderately open state in other complexes. This study substantiates the loop ordering property of DIIs as the basis for high-affinity InhA inhibitors under the molecular recognition phenomena. This property can be used as a parameter to identify potential DIIs using virtual screening approaches.     

A highly conserved tryptophan residue in the fourth transmembrane domain of the A1 adenosine receptor is essential for ligand binding but not receptor homodimerization

Dimerization between G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a clearly established phenomenon. However, limited information is currently available on the interface essential for this process. Based on structural comparisons and sequence homology between rhodopsin and A₁ adenosine receptor (A₁R), we initially hypothesized that four residues in transmembrane (TM) 4 and TM5 are involved in A₁R homodimerization. Accordingly, these residues were substituted with Ala by site-directed mutagenesis. Interestingly, the mutant protein displayed no significant decrease in homodimer formation compared with wild-type A₁R, as evident from coimmunoprecipitation and BRET² analyses (improved bioluminescence resonance energy transfer system offered by Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences), but lost ligand binding activity almost completely. Further studies disclosed that this effect was derived from the mutation of one particular residue, Trp132, which is highly conserved among many GPCRs. Confocal immunofluorescence and cell-surface biotinylation studies revealed that the mutant receptors localized normally at transfected cell membranes, signifying that loss of ligand binding was not because of defective cellular trafficking. Molecular modeling of the A₁R-ligand complex disclosed that Trp132 interacted with several residues located in TM3 and TM5 that stabilized agonist binding. Thus, loss of interactions of Trp with these residues may, in turn, disrupt binding to agonists. Our study provides strong evidence of the essential role of the highly conserved Trp132 in TM4 of adenosine receptors.     

Interactions of the Melanocortin-4 Receptor with the Peptide Agonist NDP-MSH

Melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) has an important regulatory role in energy homeostasis and food intake. Peptide agonists of the MC4R are characterized by the conserved sequence His₆-Phe₇-Arg₈-Trp₉, which is crucial for their interaction with the receptor. This investigation utilized the covalent attachment approach to identify receptor residues in close proximity to the bound ligand [Nle₄,d-Phe₇]melanocyte-stimulating hormone (NDP-MSH), thereby differentiating between residues directly involved in ligand binding and those mutations that compromise ligand binding by inducing conformational changes in the receptor. Also, recent X-ray structures of G-protein-coupled receptors were utilized to refine a model of human MC4R in the active state (R^?), which was used to generate a better understanding of the binding mode of the ligand NDP-MSH at the atomic level.The mutation of residues in the human MC4R—such as Leu106 of extracellular loop 1, and Asp122, Ile125, and Asp126 of transmembrane (TM) helix 3, His264 (TM6), and Met292 (TM7)—to Cys residues produced definitive indications of proximity to the side chains of residues in the core region of the peptide ligand. Of particular interest was the contact between d-Phe₇ on the ligand and Ile125 of TM3 on the MC4R. Additionally, Met292 (TM7) equivalent to Lys(7.45) (Ballesteros numbering scheme) involved in covalently attaching retinal in rhodopsin is shown to be in close proximity to Trp₉.For the first time, the interactions between the terminal regions of NDP-MSH and the receptor are described. The amino-terminus appears to be adjacent to a series of hydrophilic residues with novel interactions at Cys196 (TM5) and Asp189 (extracellular loop 2). These interactions are reminiscent of sequential ligand binding exhibited by the β₂-adrenergic receptor, with the former interaction being equivalent to the known interaction involving Ser204 of the β₂-adrenergic receptor.     

The receptor binding conformation of bombyxin is induced by alanine(B15)

Bombyxin is an insect hormone with an insulin-like structure which affects the reduction of stored carbohydrates in the silkworm Bombyx mori. The receptor binding surface of bombyxin includes a trough on the interface between the B chain helix and the N-terminal A chain helix. Alanine(B15) is located on the edge of this feature, whereas the bottom is formed by hydrophobic core residues Ile(A2) and Leu(B14). Replacement of alanine(B15) with bulkier residues produces a negative steric effect on bombyxin receptor binding; alpha-aminobutyric acid reduced the affinity to 6.5%, valine to 1.1%, norvaline to 0.88%, and leucine to 0.05%. CD spectra of these analogues were indistinguishable from each other and identical to that of bombyxin. Changing the backbone structure by replacing alanine with glycine and alpha-aminoisobutyric acid resulted in analogues with activities of 3.7 and 1.4%, respectively, but also a disturbed structure as determined by CD spectroscopy. Replacement of other residues on the periphery of the trough, i.e., arginines at positions B12 and B16, also reduced the level of receptor binding but to a lesser extent than the replacement of alanine(B15). The level of receptor binding for citrulline(B12) bombyxin was 17% and for citrulline(B16) bombyxin was 45%. When it is considered that glycine(A1) is located on the edge of the same trough but across from Ala(B15) and is required for maintenance of the overall structure of bombyxin, it is proposed that the bombyxin receptor binding site forms a contiguous hydrophobic area consisting of residues Ile(A2), Leu(B14), and Ala(B15).     

Use of Cysteine Trapping to Map Spatial Approximations between Residues Contributing to the Helix N-capping Motif of Secretin and Distinct Residues within Each of the Extracellular Loops of Its Receptor

Amino-terminal regions of secretin-family peptides contain key determinants for biological activity and binding specificity, although the nature of interactions with receptors is unclear. A helix N-capping motif within this region has been postulated to directly contribute to agonist activity while also stabilizing formation of a helix extending toward the peptide carboxyl terminus and docking within the receptor amino terminus. We used cysteine trapping to systematically explore spatial approximations between cysteines replacing each residue in this motif of secretin (sec), Phe⁶, Thr⁷, and Leu¹⁰, and cysteines incorporated into the extracellular face of the receptor. Each peptide was a full agonist for cAMP, but had a lower binding affinity than natural hormone. These bound to COS cells expressing 61 receptor constructs incorporating cysteines in every position along each extracellular loop (ECL) and adjacent parts of transmembrane (TM) segments. Patterns of covalent labeling were distinct for each probe, with Cys⁶-sec labeling multiple residues in the carboxyl-terminal half of ECL2 and throughout ECL3, Cys⁷-sec predominantly labeling only single residues in the carboxyl-terminal end of ECL2 and the amino-terminal end of ECL3, and Cys¹⁰-sec not efficiently labeling any of these residues. These spatial constraints were used to refine our model of secretin bound to its receptor, now bringing ECL3 above the amino terminus of the ligand and revealing possible charge-charge interactions between this part of secretin and receptor residues in TM5, TM6, ECL2, and ECL3, which can orient and stabilize the peptide-receptor complex. This was validated by testing predicted approximations by mutagenesis and residue-residue complementation studies.