Serum-induced inhibition of myogenesis is differentially relieved by retinoic acid and triiodothyronine in C2 murine muscle cells

Abstract. We recently reported that triiodothyronine (T3) enhances MyoD gene expression and accelerates terminal differentiation in murine C2 myoblasts. In this paper, we are interested in the effects of other hormones acting through related nuclear receptors. Retinoic acid (RA), but not estradiol or dexamethasone, is also able to enhance MyoD gene expression (about threefold). However, the effects of RA and T3 on myogenesis are quite distinct, with a much more potent RA action. In deed, although T3 and RA positively regulate myogenesis with similar efficiency in poorly mitogenic conditions, in presence of high serum concentrations T3 can no longer trigger terminal differentiation whereas RA still remains efficient. Thus, serum concentration is a crucial parameter in discriminating between the effects of T3 and RA on myogenesis. The differential effects between these two hormone are likely to be related to the ability of RA-activated endogenous retinoic acid receptors (RARs) to induce C2 myoblasts growth-arrest and to extinguish AP1 activity (thought to act as an inhibitor of myogenesis) whereas T3-activated endogenous thyroid hormones receptors (THRs) are relatively inefficient. We propose that the much higher level of RARs in C2 cells versus THRs could to some extent account for the differential ability of T3 and RA to antagonize serum-regulated mitogenic pathways in myogenic cells. This study provides clear evidence for an important role of RA on MyoD gene expression and myogenesis and suggests that T3 and RA could play overlapping, but distinct, roles on muscle development.     

The levels of vascular smooth as well as skeletal muscle actin mRNAs differ substantially among both myoblast and fibroblast lines with different skeletal myogenic potentials.

Little is known about the factors which regulate vascular smooth muscle (vsm) actin gene expression during skeletal myogenesis in culture. We have therefore looked for differences in the levels of accumulation of vsm actin mRNA among six mouse cell lines differing in apparent myogenic potential or in the complement of myogenesis determination genes which they express: NIH 3T3 and 10T1/2 non-myogenic fibroblasts and four myogenic lines--3T3-MyoD1 and 10EMc11s, MyoD/myogenin expressing sublines of the fibroblast lines, derived by transfer into the parent lines of a MyoD cDNA expression construct; C2C12, which expresses all four known myogenesis determination genes; and BC3H1, which expresses myf-5, myogenin, little herculin, and no MyoD. In differentiated cells of all four myogenic lines, vsm actin mRNA was expressed at levels dramatically higher than in growth-arrested NIH 3T3 cells, consistent with expression of vsm actin mRNA as an intrinsic part of the skeletal myogenic program somehow directed by myogenesis determination gene products. Interestingly, however, the level of vsm actin mRNA in growth arrested C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts was also dramatically higher than that in NIH 3T3. In view of these findings, and of the relative ease with which 10T1/2 as opposed to NIH 3T3 cells can be converted to myogenic lines, we hypothesize that factors which can act to regulate vsm actin gene expression in the absence of myogenesis determination gene expression may also influence the skeletal myogenic potential of the cells in which they are found. Among the myogenic lines, the ratio of vsm to skm actin mRNA was highest in BC3H1 cells, raising the possibility that were these cells forced to express MyoD and/or more herculin, as do the other myogenic lines, the ratio would decrease. Thus both fibroblast and myogenic lines will be useful for investigating the mechanisms controlling skeletal myogenesis and vsm and skm actin gene expression during myogenesis.     

The levels of vascular smooth as well as skeletal muscle actin mRNAS differ substantially among both myoblast and fibroblast lines with different skeletal myogenic potentials.

Little is known about the factors which regulate vascular smooth muscle (vsm) actin gene expression during skeletal myogenesis in culture. We have therefore looked for differences in the levels of accumulation of vsm actin mRNA among six mouse cell lines differing in apparent myogenic potential or in the complement of myogenesis determination genes which they express: NIH 3T3 and 10T1/2 non-myogenic fibroblasts and four myogenic lines--3T3-MyoD1 and 10EMc11s, MyoD/myogenin expressing sublines of the fibroblast lines, derived by transfer into the parent lines of a MyoD cDNA expression construct; C2C12, which expresses all four known myogenesis determination genes; and BC3H1, which expresses myf-5, myogenin, little herculin, and no MyoD. In differentiated cells of all four myogenic lines, vsm actin mRNA was expressed at levels dramatically higher than in growth-arrested NIH 3T3 cells, consistent with expression of vsm actin mRNA as an intrinsic part of the skeletal myogenic program somehow directed by myogenesis determination gene products. Interestingly, however, the level of vsm actin mRNA in growth arrested C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts was also dramatically higher than that in NIH 3T3. In view of these findings, and of the relative ease with which 10T1/2 as opposed to NIH 3T3 cells can be converted to myogenic lines, we hypothesize that factors which can act to regulate vsm actin gene expression in the absence of myogenesis determination gene expression may also influence the skeletal myogenic potential of the cells in which they are found. Among the myogenic lines, the ratio of vsm to skm actin mRNA was highest in BC3H1 cells, raising the possibility that were these cells forced to express MyoD and/or more herculin, as do the other myogenic lines, the ratio would decrease. Thus both fibroblast and myogenic lines will be useful for investigating the mechanisms controlling skeletal myogenesis and vsm and skm actin gene expression during myogenesis.     

Aberrant regulation of MyoD1 contributes to the partially defective myogenic phenotype of BC3H1 cells [published erratum appears in J Cell Biol 1990 Jun;110(6):2231]

Two skeletal muscle-specific regulatory factors, myogenin and MyoD1, share extensive homology within a myc similarity region and have each been shown to activate the morphologic and molecular events associated with myogenesis after transfection into nonmyogenic cells. The BC3H1 muscle cell line expresses myogenin and other muscle-specific genes, but does not express MyoD1 during differentiation. BC3H1 cells also do not upregulate alpha-cardiac actin or fast myosin light chain, nor do they form multinucleate myotubes during differentiation. In this study, we examined the basis for the lack of MyoD1 expression in BC3H1 cells and investigated whether their failure to express MyoD1 is responsible for their defects in differentiation. We report that expression of an exogenous MyoD1 cDNA in BC3H1 cells was sufficient to elevate the expression of alpha-cardiac actin and fast myosin light chain, and to convert these cells to a phenotype that forms multinucleate myotubes during differentiation. Whereas myogenin and MyoD1 positively regulated their own expression in transfected 10T1/2 cells, they could not, either alone or in combination, activate MyoD1 expression in BC3H1 cells. Exposure of BC3H1 cells to 5-azacytidine also failed to activate MyoD1 expression or to rescue the cell's ability to fuse. These results suggest that BC3H1 cells may possess a defect that prevents activation of the MyoD1 gene by MyoD1 or myogenin. That an exogenous MyoD1 gene could rescue those aspects of the differentiation program that are defective in BC3H1 cells also suggests that the actions of MyoD1 and myogenin are not entirely redundant and that MyoD1 may be required for activation of the complete repertoire of events associated with myogenesis.     

The homeodomain protein Barx2 promotes myogenic differentiation and is regulated by myogenic regulatory factors

The homeobox protein Barx2 is expressed in both smooth and skeletal muscle and is up-regulated during differentiation of skeletal myotubes. Here we use antisense-oligonucleotide inhibition of Barx2 expression in limb bud cell culture to show that Barx2 is required for myotube formation. Moreover, overexpression of Barx2 accelerates the fusion of MyoD-positive limb bud cells and C2C12 myoblasts. However, overexpression of Barx2 does not induce ectopic MyoD expression in either limb bud cultures or in multipotent C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal cells, and does not induce fusion of C3H10T1/2 cells. These results suggest that Barx2 acts downstream of MyoD. To test this hypothesis, we isolated the Barx2 gene promoter and identified DNA regulatory elements that might control Barx2 expression during myogenesis. The proximal promoter of the Barx2 gene contained binding sites for several factors involved in myoblast differentiation including MyoD, myogenin, serum response factor, and myocyte enhancer factor 2. Co-transfection experiments showed that binding sites for both MyoD and serum response factor are necessary for activation of the promoter by MyoD and myogenin. Taken together, these studies indicate that Barx2 is a key regulator of myogenic differentiation that acts downstream of muscle regulatory factors.