How regulators of G protein signaling achieve selective regulation

The regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) are a family of cellular proteins that play an essential regulatory role in G protein-mediated signal transduction. There are multiple RGS subfamilies consisting of over 20 different RGS proteins. They are basically the guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)-accelerating proteins that specifically interact with G protein alpha subunits. RGS proteins display remarkable selectivity and specificity in their regulation of receptors, ion channels, and other G protein-mediated physiological events. The molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying such selectivity are complex and cooperate at many different levels. Recent research data have provided strong evidence that the spatiotemporal-specific expression of RGS proteins and their target components, as well as the specific protein-protein recognition and interaction through their characteristic structural domains and functional motifs, are determinants for RGS selectivity and specificity. Other molecular mechanisms, such as alternative splicing and scaffold proteins, also significantly contribute to RGS selectivity. To pursue a thorough understanding of the mechanisms of RGS selective regulation will be of great significance for the advancement of our knowledge of molecular and cellular signal transduction.     

Paramyxovirus budding

Our knowledge about envelope virus budding has been dramatically increased, since L-domain motifs were identified within their matrix and retroviral Gag proteins which drive virus budding. These viral proteins have been shown to interact with host cellular proteins involved in endocytosis and/or multi-vesicular body (MVB) sorting via their L-domains. Since budding of many enveloped viruses have been reported to be dependent on the activity of cellular Vps4, which catalyzes the disassembly of ESCRT machinery in the final step of protein sorting, this cellular function is believed to be utilized for efficient virus budding. However, for many enveloped viruses, L-domain motifs have not yet been identified, and the involvement of MVB sorting machinery in virus budding is still unknown. In this review, we will focus on paramyxoviruses among such viruses, and discuss their budding with the latest information.     

Small ubiquitin-related modifier-1: Wrestling with protein regulation

Small ubiquitin-related modifier-1 (SUMO-1), a member of the SUMO family, is evolutionally conserved from yeast to humans. First identified in 1997, the active 97 amino acid protein conjugates to and modifies a wide variety of target proteins. Through post-translational SUMOylation of cellular proteins, SUMO-1 is involved in a myriad of biologically important events such as cell cycle progression, the maintenance of genome integrity, nuclear transport and apoptosis. Interestingly, SUMO-1 has been suggested to have the ability to act as an ubiquitin antagonist, with which it shares 18% identity. Given its wide variety of functions, it follows that alterations to this molecule could be implicated in many disease states. To date, dysregulated SUMOylation has been implicated in several neurodegenerative disorders, heart disease and cancer. This highlights not only the need for further research but also the potential of SUMO-1 as a therapeutic target.     

Peptides as probes for G protein signal transduction

Triggered by agonist binding to cell surface receptors, the heterotrimeric G proteins dissociate into and βγ subunits, each activating distinct second messenger pathways. Peptides from the primary sequences of receptors, G proteins, and effectors have been used to study the molecular interactions between these proteins. Receptor-derived peptides from the second, third and fourth intracellular loops and certain naturally occurring peptides antagonize G protein interactions and can directly activate G protein. These peptides bind to G protein sites that include the N and C terminal regions of the subunit and a yet to be identified region of the β subunit. Peptides have also been useful in characterizing G protein-effector interactions. The identification of the contact sites between proteins involved in G protein signal transduction should aid in the development of non-peptide mimetic therapeutics which could specifically modify G protein-mediated cellular responses.     

Gαq signalling: The new and the old

In the last few years the interactome of Gαq has expanded considerably, contributing to improve our understanding of the cellular and physiological events controlled by this G alpha subunit. The availability of high-resolution crystal structures has led the identification of an effector-binding region within the surface of Gαq that is able to recognise a variety of effector proteins. Consequently, it has been possible to ascribe different Gαq functions to specific cellular players and to identify important processes that are triggered independently of the canonical activation of phospholipase Cβ (PLCβ), the first identified Gαq effector. Novel effectors include p63RhoGEF, that provides a link between G protein-coupled receptors and RhoA activation, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), implicated in the regulation of the Akt pathway, or the cold-activated TRPM8 channel, which is directly inhibited upon Gαq binding. Recently, the activation of ERK5 MAPK by Gq-coupled receptors has also been described as a novel PLCβ-independent signalling axis that relies upon the interaction between this G protein and two novel effectors (PKCζ and MEK5). Additionally, the association of Gαq with different regulatory proteins can modulate its effector coupling ability and, therefore, its signalling potential. Regulators include accessory proteins that facilitate effector activation or, alternatively, inhibitory proteins that downregulate effector binding or promote signal termination. Moreover, Gαq is known to interact with several components of the cytoskeleton as well as with important organisers of membrane microdomains, which suggests that efficient signalling complexes might be confined to specific subcellular environments. Overall, the complex interaction network of Gαq underlies an ever-expanding functional diversity that puts forward this G alpha subunit as a major player in the control of physiological functions and in the development of different pathological situations.     

Sensitization of adenylate cyclase: a general mechanism of neuroadaptation to persistent activation of Galpha(i/o)-coupled receptors?

Acute activation of Galphas-coupled receptors stimulates cyclic AMP accumulation leading to the activation of downstream signaling cascades. These Galphas-mediated events can be countered by acute activation of inhibitory G proteins (Galpha(i/o)), which inhibit the activity of adenylate cyclase, thereby attenuating cyclic AMP accumulation. Furthermore, an additional, less direct mechanism for Galpha(i/o) proteins modulation of cyclic AMP signaling also has been described. Persistent activation of several Galpha(i/o)-coupled receptors has been shown to result in a subsequent paradoxical enhancement of adenylate cyclase activity in response to drug-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation. This sensitization of adenylate cyclase likely represents a cellular adaptive response following prolonged activation of inhibitory receptors. Recent advances in our knowledge of G protein signaling, adenylate cyclase regulation, and other cellular signaling mechanisms have extensively increased our insight into this phenomenon. It is now thought that sensitization occurs as part of a compensatory mechanism by which the cell adapts to chronic inhibitory input. Such a mechanism may be involved in modulating Galphas-coupled receptor signaling following neurotransmitter elevations that occur in psychiatric disease states or following the administration of many drugs of abuse. This review will focus on recent advances in the understanding of molecular signaling pathways that are involved in sensitization and describe the potential role of sensitization in neuronal cell function.     

Emerging non-canonical functions for heterotrimeric G proteins in cellular signaling

Abstract

Classically heterotrimeric G proteins have been described as the principal signal transducing machinery for G-protein-coupled receptors. Receptor activation catalyzes nucleotide exchange on the Gα protein, enabling Gα-GTP and Gβγ-subunits to engage intracellular effectors to generate various cellular effects such as second messenger production or regulation of ion channel conductivity. Recent genetic and proteomic screens have identified novel heterotrimeric G-protein-interacting proteins and expanded their functional roles. This review highlights some examples of recently identified interacting proteins and summarizes how they functionally connect heterotrimeric G proteins to previously underappreciated cellular roles.     

Cell cycle regulated phosphorylation of RPA-32 occurs within the replication initiation complex.

The transition from G1 to S phase of the cell cycle may be regulated by modification of proteins which are essential for initiating DNA replication. One of the first events during initiation is to unwind the origin DNA and this requires a single-stranded DNA binding protein. RPA, a highly conserved multi-subunit single-stranded DNA binding protein, was first identified as a cellular protein necessary for the initiation of SV40 DNA replication. The 32 kDa subunit of RPA has been shown to be phosphorylated at the start of S phase. Using SV40 replication as a model, we have reproduced in vitro the S phase-dependent phosphorylation of RPA-32 and show that it occurs specifically within the replication initiation complex. Phosphorylated RPA-32 is predominantly associated with DNA. Phosphorylation is not a pre-requisite for association with DNA, but occurs after RPA binds to single-stranded DNA formed at the origin during the initiation phase. The protein kinase(s) which phosphorylates RPA-32 is present at all stages of the cell cycle but RPA-32 does not bind to the SV40 origin or become phosphorylated in extracts from G1 cells. Therefore, the cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of RPA-32 may be regulated by its binding to single-stranded origin DNA during replication initiation.     

Structure of small G proteins and their regulators

In recent years small G proteins have become an intensively studied group of regulatory GTP hydrolases involved in cell signaling. More than 100 small G proteins have been identified in eucaryotes from protozoan to human. The small G protein superfamily includes Ras, Rho Rab, Rac, Sarl/Arf and Ran homologs, which take part in numerous and diverse cellular processes, such as gene expression, cytoskeleton reorganization, microtubule organization, and vesicular and nuclear transport. These proteins share a common structural core, described as the G domain, and significant sequence similarity. In this paper we review the available data on G domain structure, together with a detailed analysis of the mechanism of action. We also present small G protein regulators: GTPase activating proteins that bind to a catalytic G domain and increase its low intrinsic hydrolase activity, GTPase dissociation inhibitors that stabilize the GDP-bound, inactive state of G proteins, and guanine nucleotide exchange factors that accelerate nucleotide exchange in response to cellular signals. Additionally, in this paper we describe some aspects of small G protein interactions with down-stream effectors.     

Signaling functions of phosphatidic acid

Phosphatidic acid (PA) has emerged as a new class of lipid mediators involved in diverse cellular functions in plants, animals, and microorganisms. Considerable progress has been made recently on the production, cellular function, and mode of action of PA in the cell. The cellular levels of PA undergo dynamic changes in response to developmental and environmental stimuli. The production of signaling PA is mediated by families of multiple enzymes that regulate the timing, location, amount, and molecular species of PA. A number of PA target proteins have been identified, which include proteins involved in phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of proteins and lipids, as well as in G protein regulation, vesicular trafficking, and metabolism. PA mediates cellular functions through different modes of action, such as membrane tethering, modulation of enzymatic activities, and/or structural effects on cell membranes. The regulatory processes in which PA has been implicated include signaling pathways in cell growth, proliferation, reproduction, and responses to hormones and biotic and abiotic stresses.     

Controlling the cell cycle: The role of calcium/calmodulin-stimulated protein kinases I and II

Many studies have implicated Ca2+ and calmodulin (CaM) as regulators of the cell cycle. Ca2+/CaM-stimulated proteins, including the family of multifunctional Ca2+/CaM-stimulated protein kinases (CaMK), have also been identified as mediators of cell cycle progression. CaMKII is the best-characterized member of this family, and is regulated by multi-site phosphorylation and targeting. Using pharmacological inhibitors that were believed to be specific for CaMKII, CaMKII has been implicated in every phase of the cell cycle. However, these ‘specific’ inhibitors also produce effects on other CaMKs. These additional effects are usually ignored, and the effects of the inhibitors are normally attributed to CaMKII without further investigation. Using new specific molecular techniques, it has become clear that CaMKI is an important regulator of G1, whereas CaMKII is essential for regulating G2/M and the metaphase-anaphase transition. If the mechanisms controlling these events can be fully elucidated, new targets for controlling proliferative diseases may be identified.     

Immune responses to stress proteins: Applications to infectious disease and cancer

Heat shock proteins, or stress proteins have been identified as part of a highly conserved cellular defence mechanism mediated by multiple, distinct gene familes and corresponding gene products. As intracellular chaperones, stress proteins participate in many essential biochemical pathways of protein maturation and function active during times of stress and during normal cellular homeostasis. In addition to their well-characterized role as protein chaperones, stress proteins are now realized to possess another important biological property: immunogenicity. Stress proteins are now understood to play a fundamental role in immune surveillance of infection and malignancy and this body of basic research has provided a framework for their clinical application. As key targets of both humoral and cellular immunity during infection, stress proteins have accordingly received considerable research interest as prophylactic vaccines for infectious disease applications. The unique and potent immunostimulatory properties of stress proteins have similarly been applied to the development of new approaches to cancer therapy, including both protein and gene-based modalities.     

Pertussis toxin effects on T lymphocytes are mediated through CD3 and not by pertussis toxin catalyzed modification of a G protein

Pertussis toxin (PT) has been shown to have a variety of effects on T lymphocyte function, and its activity has been used to suggest the involvement of a G protein in the early events of T lymphocyte activation. In this report, the effects of PT on T lymphocytes have been investigated in detail. PT at a concentration of 10 micrograms/ml rapidly stimulated early events that are normally induced by occupancy of the TCR complex in Jurkat cells and cloned, murine CTL including increased intracellular Ca2+ concentration, serine esterase release, and induction of Ag non-specific target cell lysis. However, 1-h treatment with this concentration of PT induced a state that was refractory to further receptor stimulation in Jurkat cells but not cloned CTL although substrate membrane proteins were modified to a similar extent in both cell lines. The functional effects of PT were mimicked by the B oligomer of PT which did not, however, catalyze ADP-ribosylation of membrane proteins. In addition, overnight exposure of Jurkat cells to a lower concentration of PT also modified substrate membrane proteins but did not inhibit receptor stimulation. These findings indicate that PT catalyzed ADP-ribosylation of a G protein does not account for the actions of the toxin on T lymphocytes. Finally, direct stimulation of increased intracellular Ca2+ concentration by PT and the B oligomer only occurred in T lymphocytes expressing CD3. This suggests that the mitogenic effect of PT holotoxin is mediated by the interaction of the B oligomer with CD3 and that this may account for many of the effects of PT holotoxin both in vivo and in vitro.     

Molecular and cellular mechanisms of the age-dependency of opioid analgesia and tolerance

ABSTRACT: The age-dependency of opioid analgesia and tolerance has been noticed in both clinical observation and laboratory studies. Evidence shows that many molecular and cellular events that play essential roles in opioid analgesia and tolerance are actually age-dependent. For example, the expression and functions of endogenous opioid peptides, multiple types of opioid receptors, G protein subunits that couple to opioid receptors, and regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) change with development and age. Other signaling systems that are critical to opioid tolerance development, such as N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors, also undergo age-related changes. It is plausible that the age-dependent expression and functions of molecules within and related to the opioid signaling pathways, as well as age-dependent cellular activity such as agonist-induced opioid receptor internalization and desensitization, eventually lead to significant age-dependent changes in opioid analgesia and tolerance development.     

A cellular logic for G protein-coupled ion channel pathways.

A vast array of cellular signal transduction processes arise from combinations of many different types of agonists, receptors, effectors, and coupling molecules such as heterotrimeric G proteins or protein kinases that connect receptors to effectors. Receptors, effectors, G proteins, and kinases are being newly identified at bewildering speeds and in the process it seems that our understanding of how cells respond to specific stimuli may have diminished just as we lose sight of the forest when we are buried in the trees. Evolution would suggest that there may be a logic to the response provoked by a given stimulus and, using our recently acquired knowledge of G protein pathways between receptors and ion channel effectors, I will attempt to decipher what the underlying logic might be.     

The DAP-kinase interactome

DAP-kinase (DAPK) is a Ca²⁺/calmodulin regulated Ser/Thr kinase that activates a diverse range of cellular activities. It is subject to multiple layers of regulation involving both intramolecular signaling, and interactions with additional proteins, including other kinases and phosphatases. Its protein stability is modulated by at least three distinct ubiquitin-dependent systems. Like many kinases, DAPK participates in several signaling cascades, by phosphorylating additional kinases such as ZIP-kinase and protein kinase D (PKD), or Pin1, a phospho-directed peptidyl-prolyl isomerase that regulates the function of many phosphorylated proteins. Other substrate targets have more direct cellular effects; for example, phosphorylation of the myosin II regulatory chain and tropomyosin mediate some of DAPK’s cytoskeletal functions, including membrane blebbing during cell death and cell motility. DAPK induces distinct death pathways of apoptosis, autophagy and programmed necrosis. Among the substrates implicated in these processes, phosphorylation of PKD, Beclin 1, and the NMDA receptor has been reported. Interestingly, not all cellular effects are mediated by DAPK’s catalytic activity. For example, by virtue of protein–protein interactions alone, DAPK activates pyruvate kinase isoform M2, the microtubule affinity regulating kinases and inflammasome protein NLRP3, to promote glycolysis, influence microtubule dynamics, and enhance interleukin-1β production, respectively. In addition, a number of other substrates and interacting proteins have been identified, the physiological significance of which has not yet been established. All of these substrates, effectors and regulators together comprise the DAPK interactome. By presenting the components of the interactome network, this review will clarify both the mechanisms by which DAPK function is regulated, and by which it mediates its various cellular effects.     

PrPC has nucleic acid chaperoning properties similar to the nucleocapsid protein of HIV-1

The function of the cellular prion protein (PrPC) remains obscure. Studies suggest that PrPC functions in several processes including signal transduction and Cu2+ metabolism. PrPC has also been established to bind nucleic acids. Therefore we investigated the properties of PrPC as a putative nucleic acid chaperone. Surprisingly, PrPC possesses all the nucleic acid chaperoning properties previously specific to retroviral nucleocapsid proteins. PrPC appears to be a molecular mimic of NCP7, the nucleocapsid protein of HIV-1. Thus PrPC, like NCP7, chaperones the annealing of tRNA(Lys) to the HIV-1 primer binding site, the initial step of retrovirus replication. PrPC also chaperones the two DNA strand transfers required for production of a complete proviral DNA with LTRs. Concerning the functions of NCP7 during budding, PrPC also mimices NCP7 by dimerizing the HIV-1 genomic RNA. These data are unprecedented because, although many cellular proteins have been identified as nucleic acid chaperones, none have the properties of retroviral nucleocapsid proteins.