New Insight into Ni‐Rich Layered Structure for Next‐Generation Li Rechargeable Batteries

An increase in the amount of nickel in LiMO₂ (M = Ni, Co, Mn) layered system is actively pursued in lithium‐ion batteries to achieve higher capacity. Nevertheless, fundamental effects of Ni element in the three‐component layered system are not systematically studied. Therefore, to unravel the role of Ni as a major contributor to the structural and electrochemical properties of Ni‐rich materials, Co‐fixed LiNi_0.5+xCo_0.2Mn_0.3–xO₂ (x = 0, 0.1, and 0.2) layered materials are investigated. The results, on the basis of synchrotron‐based characterization techniques, present a decreasing trend of Ni²⁺ content in Li layer with increasing total Ni contents. Moreover, it is discovered that the c_hex.‐lattice parameter of layered system is not in close connection with the interslab thickness related to actual Li ion pathway. The interslab thickness increases with increasing Ni concentration even though the c_hex.‐lattice parameter decreases. Furthermore, the lithium ion pathway is preserved in spite of the fact that the c‐axis is collapsed at highly deintercalated states. Also, a higher Ni content material shows better structural properties such as larger interslab thickness, lower cation disorder, and smoother phase transition, resulting in better electrochemical properties including higher Li diffusivity and lower overpotential when comparing materials with lower Ni content.     

Ni and Co Segregations on Selective Surface Facets and Rational Design of Layered Lithium Transition‐Metal Oxide Cathodes

The chemical processes occurring on the surface of cathode materials during battery cycling play a crucial role in determining battery's performance. However, the understanding of such surface chemistry is far from clear due to the complexity of redox chemistry during battery charge/discharge. Through intensive aberration corrected STEM investigation on ten layered oxide cathode materials, two important findings on the pristine oxides are reported. First, Ni and Co show strong plane selectivity when building up their respective surface segregation layers (SSLs). Specifically, Ni‐SSL is exclusively developed on (200)_m facet in Li–Mn‐rich oxides (monoclinic C2/m symmetry) and on (012)_h facet in Mn–Ni equally rich oxides (hexagonal R‐3m symmetry), while Co‐SSL has a strong preference to (20?2)_m plane with minimal Co‐SSL also developed on some other planes in Li–Mn‐rich cathodes. Structurally, Ni‐SSLs tend to form spinel‐like lattice while Co‐SSLs are in a rock‐salt‐like structure. Second, by increasing Ni concentration in these layered oxides, Ni and Co SSLs can be suppressed and even eliminated. The findings indicate that Ni and Co SSLs are tunable through controlling particle morphology and oxide composition, which opens up a new way for future rational design and synthesis of cathode materials.     

A Comprehensive Analysis of the Interphasial and Structural Evolution over Long‐Term Cycling of Ultrahigh‐Nickel Cathodes in Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Ultrahigh‐Ni layered oxides hold great promise as high‐energy‐density cathodes at an affordable cost for lithium‐ion batteries, yet their practical application is greatly hampered by the poor cyclability. Herein, by employing LiNi_0.94Co_0.06O₂ as a model cathode in a full‐cell configuration, the interphasial and structural evolution processes of ultrahigh‐Ni layered oxides are systematically investigated over the course of their service life (1500 cycles). By applying advanced analytic techniques (e.g., Li‐isotope labeling, region‐of‐interest method), the dynamic chemical evolution on the cathode surface is revealed with spatial resolution, and the correlation between lattice distortion and cathode surface reactivity is established. Benefiting from in situ X‐ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, the ultrahigh‐Ni layered oxide is demonstrated to undergo dual‐phase reaction mechanisms with huge lattice variation, which leads to a decrease in crystallinity and secondary particle pulverization. Furthermore, the critical impact of cathode surface reaction on the graphite anode–electrolyte interphase (AEI) is revealed at nanometer scale, and a universal chemical/physical evolution process of the AEI is illustrated, for the first time. Finally, the practical viability of ultrahigh‐Ni layered oxides is demonstrated through Al‐doping strategy. This work presents a comprehensive understanding of the structural and interphasial degradation of ultrahigh‐Ni layered oxide cathodes for developing high‐energy‐density lithium‐ion batteries.     

A New Spinel‐Layered Li‐Rich Microsphere as a High‐Rate Cathode Material for Li‐Ion Batteries

Li‐rich layered materials are considered to be the promising low‐cost cathodes for lithium‐ion batteries but they suffer from poor rate capability despite of efforts toward surface coating or foreign dopings. Here, spinel‐layered Li‐rich Li‐Mn‐Co‐O microspheres are reported as a new high‐rate cathode material for Li‐ion batteries. The synthetic procedure is relatively simple, involving the formation of uniform carbonate precursor under solvothermal conditions and its subsequent transformation to an assembled microsphere that integrates a spinel‐like component with a layered component by a heat treatment. When calcined at 700 °C, the amount of transition metal Mn and Co in the Li‐Mn‐Co‐O microspheres maintained is similar to at 800 °C, while the structures of constituent particles partially transform from 2D to 3D channels. As a consequence, when tested as a cathode for lithium‐ion batteries, the spinel‐layered Li‐rich Li‐Mn‐Co‐O microspheres obtained at 700 °C show a maximum discharge capacity of 185.1 mA h g^?1 at a very high current density of 1200 mA g^?1 between 2.0 and 4.6 V. Such a capacity is among the highest reported to date at high charge‐discharge rates. Therefore, the present spinel‐layered Li‐rich Li‐Mn‐Co‐O microspheres represent an attractive alternative to high‐rate electrode materials for lithium‐ion batteries.     

An Ion‐Exchange Promoted Phase Transition in a Li‐Excess Layered Cathode Material for High‐Performance Lithium Ion Batteries

A new approach to intentionally induce phase transition of Li‐excess layered cathode materials for high‐performance lithium ion batteries is reported. In high contrast to the limited layered‐to‐spinel phase transformation that occurred during in situ electrochemical cycles, a Li‐excess layered Li[Li_0.2Mn_0.54Ni_0.13Co_0.13]O₂ is completely converted to a Li₄Mn₅O₁₂‐type spinel product via ex situ ion‐exchanges and a post‐annealing process. Such a layered‐to‐spinel phase conversion is examined using in situ X‐ray diffraction and in situ high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy. It is found that generation of sufficient lithium ion vacancies within the Li‐excess layered oxide plays a critical role for realizing a complete phase transition. The newly formed spinel material exhibits initial discharge capacities of 313.6, 267.2, 204.0, and 126.3 mAh g^?1 when cycled at 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 5 C (1 C = 250 mA g^?1), respectively, and can retain a specific capacity of 197.5 mAh g^?1 at 1 C after 100 electrochemical cycles, demonstrating remarkably improved rate capability and cycling stability in comparison with the original Li‐excess layered cathode materials. This work sheds light on fundamental understanding of phase transitions within Li‐excess layered oxides. It also provides a novel route for tailoring electrochemical performance of Li‐excess layered cathode materials for high‐capacity lithium ion batteries.     

Anionic Redox Activity Regulated by Transition Metal in Lithium‐Rich Layered Oxides

The anionic redox activity in lithium‐rich layered oxides has the potential to boost the energy density of lithium‐ion batteries. Although it is widely accepted that the anionic redox activity stems from the orphaned oxygen energy level, its regulation and structural stabilization, which are essential for practical employment, remain still elusive, requiring an improved fundamental understanding. Herein, the oxygen redox activity for a wide range of 3d transition‐metal‐based Li₂TMO₃ compounds is investigated and the intrinsic competition between the cationic and anionic redox reaction is unveiled. It is demonstrated that the energy level of the orphaned oxygen state (and, correspondingly, the activity) is delicately governed by the type and number of neighboring transition metals owing to the π‐type interactions between Li? O? Li and M t_2g states. Based on these findings, a simple model that can be used to estimate the anionic redox activity of various lithium‐rich layered oxides is proposed. The model explains the recently reported significantly different oxygen redox voltages or inactivity in lithium‐rich materials despite the commonly observed Li? O? Li states with presumably unhybridized character. The discovery of hidden factors that rule the anionic redox in lithium‐rich cathode materials will aid in enabling controlled cumulative cationic and anionic redox reactions.     

In Situ Probing and Synthetic Control of Cationic Ordering in Ni‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathodes

Ni‐rich layered oxides (LiNi_1–x M_x O₂; M = Co, Mn, …) are appealing alternatives to conventional LiCoO₂ as cathodes in Li‐ion batteries for automobile and other large‐scale applications due to their high theoretical capacity and low cost. However, preparing stoichiometric LiNi_1–x M_x O₂ with ordered layer structure and high reversible capacity, has proven difficult due to cation mixing in octahedral sites. Herein, in situ studies of synthesis reactions and the associated structural ordering in preparing LiNiO₂ and the Co‐substituted variant, LiNi_0.8Co_0.2O₂, are made, to gain insights into synthetic control of the structure and electrochemical properties of Ni‐rich layered oxides. Results from this study indicate a direct transformation of the intermediate from the rock salt structure into hexagonal phase, and during the process, Co substitution facilities the nucleation of a Co‐rich layered phase at low temperatures and subsequent growth and stabilization of solid solution Li(Ni, Co)O₂ upon further heat treatment. Optimal conditions are identified from the in situ studies and utilized to obtain stoichiometric LiNi_0.8Co_0.2O₂ that exhibits high capacity (up to 200 mA h g^?1 ) with excellent retention. The findings shed light on designing high performance Ni‐rich layered oxide cathodes through synthetic control of the structural ordering in the materials.     

Controlled Atomic Solubility in Mn‐Rich Composite Material to Achieve Superior Electrochemical Performance for Li‐Ion Batteries

The quest for high energy density and high power density electrode materials for lithium‐ion batteries has been intensified to meet strongly growing demand for powering electric vehicles. Conventional layered oxides such as Co‐rich LiCoO₂ and Ni‐rich Li(Ni_xMn_yCo_z)O₂ that rely on only transition metal redox reaction have been faced with growing constraints due to soaring price on cobalt. Therefore, Mn‐rich electrode materials excluding cobalt would be desirable with respect to available resources and low cost. Here, the strategy of achieving both high energy density and high power density in Mn‐rich electrode materials by controlling the solubility of atoms between phases in a composite is reported. The resulting Mn‐rich material that is composed of defective spinel phase and partially cation‐disordered layered phase can achieve the highest energy density, ≈1100 W h kg^?1 with superior power capability up to 10C rate (3 A g^?1) among other reported Mn‐rich materials. This approach provides new opportunities to design Mn‐rich electrode materials that can achieve high energy density and high power density for Li‐ion batteries.     

Going beyond Intercalation Capacity of Aqueous Batteries by Exploiting Conversion Reactions of Mn and Zn electrodes for Energy‐Dense Applications

The recent trend in zinc (Zn) anode aqueous batteries has been to explore layered structures like manganese dioxides and vanadium oxides as Zn‐ion intercalation hosts. These structures, although novel, face limitations like their layered counterparts in lithium (Li)‐ion batteries, where the capacity is limited to the host's intercalation capacity. In this paper, a new strategy is proposed in enabling new generation of energy dense aqueous‐based batteries, where the conversion reactions of rock salt/spinel manganese oxides and carbon nanotube‐nested nanosized Zn electrodes are exploited to extract significantly higher capacity compared to intercalation systems. Accessing the conversion reactions allows to achieve high capacities of 750 mAh g^?1 (≈30 mAh cm^?2) from manganese oxide (MnO) and 810 mAh g^?1 (≈30 mAh cm^?2) from nanoscale Zn anodes, respectively. The high areal capacities help to attain unprecedented energy densities of 210 Wh per L‐cell and 320 Wh per kg‐total (398 Wh per kg‐active) from aqueous MnO|CNT‐Zn batteries, which allows an assessment of its viable use in a small‐scale automobile.     

Review on Challenges and Recent Advances in the Electrochemical Performance of High Capacity Li‐ and Mn‐Rich Cathode Materials for Li‐Ion Batteries

Li and Mn‐rich layered oxides, xLi₂MnO₃·(1–x)LiMO₂ (M=Ni, Mn, Co), are promising cathode materials for Li‐ion batteries because of their high specific capacity that can exceed 250 mA h g^?1. However, these materials suffer from high 1^st cycle irreversible capacity, gradual capacity fading, low rate capability, a substantial charge‐discharge voltage hysteresis, and a large average discharge voltage decay during cycling. The latter detrimental phenomenon is ascribed to irreversible structural transformations upon cycling of these cathodes related to potentials ≥4.5 V required for their charging. Transition metal inactivation along with impedance increase and partial layered‐to‐spinel transformation during cycling are possible reasons for the detrimental voltage fade. Doping of Li, Mn‐rich materials by Na, Mg, Al, Fe, Co, Ru, etc. is useful for stabilizing capacity and mitigating the discharge‐voltage decay of xLi₂MnO₃·(1–x)LiMO₂ electrodes. Surface modifications by thin coatings of Al₂O₃, V₂O₅, AlF₃, AlPO₄, etc. or by gas treatment (for instance, by NH₃) can also enhance voltage and capacity stability during cycling. This paper describes the recent literature results and ongoing efforts from our groups to improve the performance of Li, Mn‐rich materials. Focus is also on preparation of cobalt‐free cathodes, which are integrated layered‐spinel materials with high reversible capacity and stable performance.     

Site‐Selective In Situ Electrochemical Doping for Mn‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathode Materials in Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Various doped materials have been investigated to improve the structural stability of layered transition metal oxides for lithium‐ion batteries. Most doped materials are obtained through solid state methods, in which the doping of cations is not strictly site selective. This paper demonstrates, for the first time, an in situ electrochemical site‐selective doping process that selectively substitutes Li⁺ at Li sites in Mn‐rich layered oxides with Mg²⁺. Mg²⁺ cations are electrochemically intercalated into Li sites in delithiated Mn‐rich layered oxides, resulting in the formation of [Li_1?xMg_y][Mn_1?zM_z]O₂ (M = Co and Ni). This Mg²⁺ intercalation is irreversible, leading to the favorable doping of Mg²⁺ at the Li sites. More interestingly, the amount of intercalated Mg²⁺ dopants increases with the increasing amount of Mn in Li_1?x[Mn_1?zM_z]O₂, which is attributed to the fact that the Mn‐to‐O electron transfer enhances the attractive interaction between Mg²⁺ dopants and electronegative O^δ? atoms. Moreover, Mg²⁺ at the Li sites in layered oxides suppresses cation mixing during cycling, resulting in markedly improved capacity retention over 200 cycles. The first‐principle calculations further clarify the role of Mg²⁺ in reduced cation mixing during cycling. The new concept of in situ electrochemical doping provides a new avenue for the development of various selectively doped materials.     

Li–Ti Cation Mixing Enhanced Structural and Performance Stability of Li‐Rich Layered Oxide

Li‐rich layered metal oxides are one type of the most promising cathode materials in lithium‐ion batteries but suffer from severe voltage decay during cycling because of the continuous transition metal (TM) migration into the Li layers. A Li‐rich layered metal oxide Li_1.2Ti_0.26Ni_0.18Co_0.18Mn_0.18O₂ (LTR) is hereby designed, in which some of the Ti⁴⁺ cations are intrinsically present in the Li layers. The native Li–Ti cation mixing structure enhances the tolerance for structural distortion and inhibits the migration of the TM ions in the TMO₂ slabs during (de)lithiation. Consequently, LTR exhibits a remarkable cycling stability of 97% capacity retention after 182 cycles, and the average discharge potential drops only 90 mV in 100 cycles. In‐depth studies by electron energy loss spectroscopy and aberration‐corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy demonstrate the Li–Ti mixing structure. The charge compensation mechanism is uncovered with X‐ray absorption spectroscopy and explained with the density function theory calculations. These results show the superiority of introducing transition metal ions into the Li layers in reinforcing the structural stability of the Li‐rich layered metal oxides. These findings shed light on a possible path to the development of Li‐rich materials with better potential retention and a longer lifespan.     

Lithium/Oxygen Incorporation and Microstructural Evolution during Synthesis of Li‐Rich Layered Li[Li0.2Ni0.2Mn0.6]O2 Oxides

As promising cathode materials, the lithium‐excess 3d‐transition‐metal layered oxides can deliver much higher capacities (>250 mAh g^?1 at 0.1 C) than the current commercial layered oxide materials (≈180 mAh g^?1 at 0.1 C) used in lithium ion batteries. Unfortunately, the original formation mechanism of these layered oxides during synthesis is not completely elucidated, that is, how is lithium and oxygen inserted into the matrix structure of the precursor during lithiation reaction? Here, a promising and practical method, a coprecipitation route followed by a microwave heating process, for controllable synthesis of cobalt‐free lithium‐excess layered compounds is reported. A series of the consistent results unambiguously confirms that oxygen atoms are successively incorporated into the precursor obtained by a coprecipitation process to maintain electroneutrality and to provide the coordination sites for inserted Li ions and transition metal cations via a high‐temperature lithiation. It is found that the electrochemical performances of the cathode materials are strongly related to the phase composition and preparation procedure. The monoclinic layered Li[Li_0.2Ni_0.2Mn_0.6]O₂ cathode materials with state‐of‐the‐art electrochemical performance and comparably high discharge capacities of 171 mAh g^?1 at 10 C are obtained by microwave annealing at 750 °C for 2 h.     

Fundamental Understanding and Material Challenges in Rechargeable Nonaqueous Li–O2 Batteries: Recent Progress and Perspective

Energy storage challenges have triggered growing interest in various battery technologies and electrocatalysis. As a particularly promising variety, the Li–O₂ battery with an extremely high energy density is of great significance, offering tremendous opportunities to improve cell performance via understanding catalytic mechanisms and the exploration of new materials. Furthermore, focus on nonaqueous electrolyte‐based Li–O₂ batteries has markedly intensified since there could be a higher probability of commercialization, compared to that of solid‐state or aqueous electrolytes. The recent advancements of the nonaqueous Li–O₂ battery in terms of fundamental understanding and material challenges, including electrolyte stability, water effect, and noncarbon cathode materials are summarized in this review. Further, the current status of water impact on discharge products, possible mechanisms, and parasitic reactions in nonaqueous electrolytes are reviewed for the first time. The key challenges of noncarbon oxygen electrode materials, such as noble metals and metal oxides‐based cathodes, transition metals, transition metal compounds (carbides, oxides) based cathodes as well as noncarbon supported catalysts are discussed. This review concludes with a perspective on future research directions for nonaqueous Li–O₂ batteries.     

Nickel‐Rich and Lithium‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathodes: Progress and Perspectives

Ni‐rich layered oxides and Li‐rich layered oxides are topics of much research interest as cathodes for Li‐ion batteries due to their low cost and higher discharge capacities compared to those of LiCoO₂ and LiMn₂O₄. However, Ni‐rich layered oxides have several pitfalls, including difficulty in synthesizing a well‐ordered material with all Ni³⁺ ions, poor cyclability, moisture sensitivity, a thermal runaway reaction, and formation of a harmful surface layer caused by side reactions with the electrolyte. Recent efforts towards Ni‐rich layered oxides have centered on optimizing the composition and processing conditions to obtain controlled bulk and surface compositions to overcome the capacity fade. Li‐rich layered oxides also have negative aspects, including oxygen loss from the lattice during first charge, a large first cycle irreversible capacity loss, poor rate capability, side reactions with the electrolyte, low tap density, and voltage decay during extended cycling. Recent work on Li‐rich layered oxides has focused on understanding the surface and bulk structures and eliminating the undesirable properties. Followed by a brief introduction, an account of recent developments on the understanding and performance gains of Ni‐rich and Li‐rich layered oxide cathodes is provided, along with future research directions.     

Layered Oxide Cathodes for Sodium‐Ion Batteries: Phase Transition,Air Stability,and Performance

The increasing demand for replacing conventional fossil fuels with clean energy or economical and sustainable energy storage drives better battery research today. Sodium‐ion batteries (SIBs) are considered as a promising alternative for grid‐scale storage applications due to their similar “rocking‐chair” sodium storage mechanism to lithium‐ion batteries, the natural abundance, and the low cost of Na resources. Searching for appropriate electrode materials with acceptable electrochemical performance is the key point for development of SIBs. Layered transition metal oxides represent one of the most fascinating electrode materials owing to their superior specific capacity, environmental benignity, and facile synthesis. However, three major challenges (irreversible phase transition, storage instability, and insufficient battery performance) are known for cathodes in SIBs. Herein, a comprehensive review on the latest advances and progresses in the exploration of layered oxides for SIBs is presented, and a detailed and deep understanding of the relationship of phase transition, air stability, and electrochemical performance in layered oxide cathodes is provided in terms of refining the structure–function–property relationship to design improved battery materials. Layered oxides will be a competitive and attractive choice as cathodes for SIBs in next‐generation energy storage devices.     

Lithium‐ and Manganese‐Rich Oxide Cathode Materials for High‐Energy Lithium Ion Batteries

Layered lithium‐ and manganese‐rich oxides (LMROs), described as xLi₂MnO₃·(1–x)LiMO₂ or Li_1+yM_1–yO₂ (M = Mn, Ni, Co, etc., 0 < x <1, 0 < y ≤ 0.33), have attracted much attention as cathode materials for lithium ion batteries in recent years. They exhibit very promising capacities, up to above 300 mA h g^?1, due to transition metal redox reactions and unconventional oxygen anion redox reaction. However, they suffer from structural degradation and severe voltage fade (i.e., decreasing energy storage) upon cycling, which are plaguing their practical application. Thus, this review will aim to describe the pristine structure, high‐capacity mechanisms and structure evolutions of LMROs. Also, recent progress associated with understanding and mitigating the voltage decay of LMROs will be discussed. Several approaches to solve this problem, such as adjusting cycling voltage window and chemical composition, optimizing synthesis strategy, controlling morphology, doping, surface modification, constructing core‐shell and layered‐spinel hetero structures, are described in detail.     

Eliminating Transition Metal Migration and Anionic Redox to Understand Voltage Hysteresis of Lithium‐Rich Layered Oxides

Lithium‐rich layered oxides are promising candidate cathode materials for the Li‐ion batteries with energy densities above 300 Wh kg^?1. However, issues such as the voltage hysteresis and decay hinder their commercial applications. Due to the entanglement of the transition metal (TM) migration and the anionic redox upon lithium extraction at high potentials, it is difficult to recognize the origin of these issues in conventional Li‐rich layered oxides. Herein, Li₂MoO₃ is chosen since prototype material to uncover the reason for the voltage hysteresis as the TM migration and anionic redox can be eliminated below 3.6 V versus Li⁺/Li in this material. On the basis of comprehensive investigations by neutron powder diffraction, scanning transmission electron microscopy, synchrotron X‐ray absorption spectroscopy, and density functional theory calculations, it is clarified that the ordering–disordering transformation of the Mo₃O₁₃ clusters induced by the intralayer Mo migration is responsible for the voltage hysteresis in the first cycle; the hysteresis can take place even without the anionic redox or the interlayer Mo migration. A similar suggestion is drawn for its iso‐structured Li₂RuO₃ (C2/c). These findings are useful for understanding of the voltage hysteresis in other complicated Li‐rich layered oxides.     

Progress in High‐Voltage Cathode Materials for Rechargeable Sodium‐Ion Batteries

Room‐temperature rechargeable sodium‐ion batteries are considered as a promising alternative technology for grid and other storage applications due to their competitive cost benefit and sustainable resource supply, triumphing other battery systems on the market. To facilitate the practical realization of the sodium‐ion technology, the energy density of sodium‐ion batteries needs to be boosted to the level of current commercial Li‐ion batteries. An effective approach would be to elevate the operating voltage of the battery, which requires the use of electrochemically stable cathode materials with high voltage versus Na⁺/Na. This review summarizes the recent progress with the emerging high‐voltage cathode materials for room‐temperature sodium‐ion batteries, which include layered transitional‐metal oxides, Na‐rich materials, and polyanion compounds. The key challenges and corresponding strategies for these materials are also discussed, with an emphasis placed on the intrinsic structural properties, Na storage electrochemistry, and the voltage variation tendency with respect to the redox reactions. The insights presented in this article can serve as a guide for improving the energy densities of room‐temperature Na‐ion batteries.     

Sodium‐Ion Batteries Paving the Way for Grid Energy Storage

The recent proliferation of renewable energy generation offers mankind hope, with regard to combatting global climate change. However, reaping the full benefits of these renewable energy sources requires the ability to store and distribute any renewable energy generated in a cost‐effective, safe, and sustainable manner. As such, sodium‐ion batteries (NIBs) have been touted as an attractive storage technology due to their elemental abundance, promising electrochemical performance and environmentally benign nature. Moreover, new developments in sodium battery materials have enabled the adoption of high‐voltage and high‐capacity cathodes free of rare earth elements such as Li, Co, Ni, offering pathways for low‐cost NIBs that match their lithium counterparts in energy density while serving the needs for large‐scale grid energy storage. In this essay, a range of battery chemistries are discussed alongside their respective battery properties while keeping metrics for grid storage in mind. Matters regarding materials and full cell cost, supply chain and environmental sustainability are discussed, with emphasis on the need to eliminate several elements (Li, Ni, Co) from NIBs. Future directions for research are also discussed, along with potential strategies to overcome obstacles in battery safety and sustainable recyclability.