Footprinting of the spinach nitrite reductase gene promoter reveals the preservation of nitrate regulatory elements between fungi and higher plants

Nitrite reductase (NiR) is the second enzyme in the nitrate assimilatory pathway reducing nitrite to ammonium. The expression of the NiR gene is induced upon the addition of nitrate. In an earlier study, a 130 bp upstream region of the spinach NiR gene promoter, located between –330 to –200, was shown to be necessary for nitrate induction of -glucuronidase (GUS) expression in tissue-specific manner in transgenic tobacco plant [28]. To further delineate the cis-acting elements involved in nitrate regulation of NiR gene expression, transgenic tobacco plants were generated with 5 deletions in the–330 to –200 region of the spinach NiR gene promoter fused to the GUS gene. Plants with the NiR promoter deleted to –230 showed a considerable increase in GUS activity in the presence of nitrate, indicating that the 30 bp region between –230 to –200 is crucial for nitrate-regulated expression of NiR. In vivo DMS footprinting of the –300 to –130 region of the NiR promoter in leaf tissues from two independent transgenic lines revealed several nitrate-inducible footprints. Footprinting within the –230 to –181 region revealed factor binding to two adjacent GATA elements separated by 24 bp. This arrangement of GATA elements is analogous to cis-regulatory sequences found in the promoters of nitrate-inducible genes of Neurospora crassa, regulated by the NIT2 Zn-finger protein. The –240 to –110 fragment of the NiR promoter, which contains two NIT2 consensus core elements, bound in vitro to a fusion protein comprising the zinc finger domain of the N. crassa NIT2 protein. The data presented here show that nitrate-inducible expression of the NiR gene is mediated by nitrate-specific binding of trans-acting factors to sequences preserved between fungi and higher plants.     

Interaction of sulfate assimilation with nitrate assimilation as a function of nutrient status and enzymatic co-regulation inbrassica juncea roots

The interaction of sulfate assimilation with nitrate assimilation inBrassica juncea roots was analyzed by monitoring the regulation of ATP sulfurylase (AS), adenosine-5’-phosphosulfate reductase (AR), sulfite reductase (SiR), and nitrite reductase (NiR). Depending on the status of sulfur and nitrogen nutrition, AS and AR activities and mRNA levels were increased by sulfate starvation but decreased by nitrate starvation. The activation of AS and AR by sulfate starvation was inhibited by sulfate/nitrate starvation. However, the rise in steady-state mRNA levels for AS and AR by sulfate starvation was not affected by sulfate/nitrate starvation. SiR gene expression was slightly activated by both sulfate starvation and sulfate/nitrate starvation, but was decreased by nitrate starvation. Although NiR gene expression was little affected by sulfate starvation, it was diminished significantly by either nitrate or nitrate/sulfate starvation. Cysteine (Cys) also decreased AS and AR activities and mRNA levels even when plants were simultaneously starved for sulfate; in contrast, both SiR and NiR gene expressions were only slightly, if at all, affected under the same conditions. This supports our conclusion that Cys, the end-product of sulfate assimilation, is the key regulatory signal. Moreover, SiR and NiR apparently are not the linking step in the co-regulation of sulfate and nitrate assimilation in plants.     

Effect of light/dark cycles on expression of nitrate assimilatory genes in maize shoots and roots

The level of nitrate reductase (NR) and nitrite reductase (NiR) varied in both shoot and root tissue from nitrate-fed Zea mays L. grown under a 16-hour light/8-hour dark regime over a 10-day period postgermination, with peak activity occurring in days 5 to 6. To study the effect of different light regimes on NR and NiR enzyme activity and mRNA levels, 6-day-old plants were grown in the presence of continuous KNO₃ (10 millimolar). Both shoot NRA and mRNA varied considerably, peaking 4 to 8 hours into the light period. Upon transferring plants to continuous light, the amplitude of the peaks increased, and the peaks moved closer together. In continuous darkness, no NR mRNA or NR enzyme activity could be detected by 8 hours and 12 hours, respectively. In either a light/dark or continuous light regime, root NRA and mRNA did not vary substantially. However, when plants were placed in continuous darkness, both declined steadily in the roots, although some remained after 48 hours. Although there was no obvious cycling of NiR enzyme activity in shoot tissue, changes in mRNA mimicked those seen for NR mRNA. The expression of NR and NiR genes is affected by the light regime adopted, but light does not have a direct effect on the expression of these genes.     

Appearance of nitrate reductase, nitrite reductase and glutamine synthetase in different organs of the Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedling as affected by light, nitrate and ammonium

Appearance of nitrate reductase (NR, EC 1.6.6.1–3), nitrite reductase (NiR, EC 1.7.7.1) and glutamine synthetase (GS, EC 6.3.1.2) under the control of nitrate, ammonium and light was studied in roots, hypocotyls and needles (cotyledonary whorl) of the Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris L.) seedling. It was found that appearance of NiR was mainly controlled by nitrate whereas appearance of GS was strongly controlled by light. In principle, the NR activity level showed the same dependency on nitrate and light as that of NiR. In the root, both nitrate and ammonium had a stimulatory effect on GS activity whereas in the whorl the induction was minor. The level of NiR (NR) activity is high in the root and hypocotyl and low in the cotyledonary whorl, whereas the GS activity level per organ increases strongly from the root to the whorl. Thus, in any particular organ the operation of the glutamine synthetase/glutamate synthase (GS/GOGAT) cycle is not closely connected to the operation of the nitrate reduction pathway. The strong control of GS/GOGAT by light and the minor sensitivity to induction by nitrate or ammonium indicate a major role of the GS/GOGAT cycle in reassimilation of endogeniously generated ammonium.     

nir1, a conditional-lethal mutation in barley causing a defect in nitrite reduction

Summary Eleven green individuals were isolated when 95000 M₂ plants of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), mutagenised with azide in the M₁, were screened for nitrite accumulation in their leaves after nitrate treatment in the light. The selected plants were maintained in aerated liquid culture solution containing glutamine as sole nitrogen source. Not all plants survived to flowering and some others that did were not fertile. One of the selected plants, STA3999, from the cultivar Tweed could be crossed to the wild-type cultivar and analysis of the F₂ progeny showed that leaf nitrite accumulation was due to a recessive mutation in a single nuclear gene, which has been designated Nir1. The homozygous nir1 mutant could be maintained to flowering in liquid culture with either glutamine or ammonium as sole nitrogen source, but died within 14 days after transfer to compost. The nitrite reductase cross-reacting material seen in nitrate-treated wild-type plants could not be detected in either the leaf or the root of the homozygous nir1 mutant. Nitrite reductase activity, measured with dithionite-reduced methyl viologen as electron donor, of the nitrate-treated homozygous nir1 mutant was much reduced but NADH-nitrate reductase activity was elevated compared to wild-type plants. We conclude that the Nir1 locus determines the formation of nitrite reductase apoprotein in both the leaf and root of barley and speculate that it represents either the nitrite reductase apoprotein gene locus or, less likely, a regulatory locus whose product is required for the synthesis of nitrite reductase, but not nitrate reductase. Elevation of NADH-nitrate reductase activity in the nir1 mutant suggests a regulatory perturbation in the expression of the Narl gene.     

Characterisation and expression studies of a root cDNA encoding for ferredoxin-nitrite reductase from Lotus japonicus

A full-length cDNA encoding for ferredoxin-nitrite reductase (NiR, EC 1.7.7.1), has been isolated from a root cDNA library from the legume Lotus japonicus and characterised. The NiR gene ( Nii ) is present as a single copy in this plant, and encodes a protein of 582 amino acids. The Lotus NiR protein is synthesised as a precursor with an amino-terminal transit peptide consisting of 25 amino acid residues. Sequence comparisons with leaf NiRs from different plant species and with other related redox proteins identified in the root NiR the same highly conserved residues involved in the cofactor binding than previously reported for leaves. Besides, a putative binding site for ferredoxin was also found in the N-terminal region of the protein. The NiR gene is expressed in roots and leaves, although the level of expression is much higher in roots, in accordance with the fact that L. japonicus assimilates nitrate mainly in roots. NiR mRNA, protein and activity are induced by nitrate in roots and leaves, while ammonium-grown plants only showed basal levels. No oscillations of NiR mRNA, protein and activity were observed during the day/night cycle, neither in roots nor leaves, making an interesting difference with rhythms observed in other plant species.     

植物中硝酸还原酶和亚硝酸还原酶的作用

植物通过硝酸盐同化途径以硝酸盐和氨的形式吸收氮元素。硝酸盐的同化是一个受到严格控制的过程,其中两个先后参加反应的酶——硝酸还原酶(NR)和亚硝酸还原酶(NiR)对初级氮的同化起主要调控。在高等植物中,NR和NiR基因的转录及转录后加工受到各种内在和外在因素的影响,翻译后调控是消除亚硝酸盐积累的重要机制。随着分子生物学技术的发展,可以更容易地通过突变体和转基因方式来研究NR和NiR基因的调控。     

A chlorate-resistant mutant defective in the regulation of nitrate reductase gene expression in Arabidopsis defines a new HY locus.

Light acts both directly as a signal and indirectly through photosynthesis to regulate the expression of genes encoding nitrate reductase (NR). Here, we report the isolation and characterization of a novel chlorate-resistant mutant that is defective in the regulation of NR gene expression. The response of NR2, but not NR1 or the gene encoding nitrate reductase (NiR), to light signals was impaired in this Arabidopsis mutant, designated cr88. In addition to NR2, the light regulation of the genes encoding the chlorophyll a/b binding protein (CAB) and the small subunit of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RBCS) was also impaired in this mutant. These results suggest that the pathway through which light regulates the expression of NR2, CAB, and RBCS genes is different from those that regulate the expression of NR1 and NiR. An examination of the deetiolation process under different light spectrum showed that cr88 is defective in red light-mediated deetiolation. Complementation tests with various long hypocotyl (hy) mutants indicated that CR88 identifies a new HY locus. The possible functions of CR88 are discussed.     

Inhibition of tobacco nitrite reductase activity by expression of antisense RNA

A tobacco nitrite reductase (NiR) cDNA and its corresponding gene were isolated from cDNA and genomic libraries. An NiR antisense mRNA was expressed in transgenic tobacco under the control of a double 35S promoter. Transformants were obtained on a medium containing ammonium as the sole source of nitrogen. One plant growing normally on ammonium but displaying drastically reduced development and chlorotic leaves when grown on nitrate as the sole source of nitrogen was studied further. This plant accumulated nitrite fivefold over wild-type level and showed reduced amounts of ammonium (11% wild-type level), glutamine (19%), and total protein (8%). NiR mRNA and activity were below detectable levels. Under these conditions, nitrate reductase (NR) activity and mRNA were overexpressed, suggesting that N-metabolites resulting from nitrate reduction are responsible for the repression of the expression of the NR gene, independently from the presence or absence of a functional NR protein.     

Cloning and expression of distinct nitrite reductases in tobacco leaves and roots

Summary Three tobacco nitrite reductase (NiR) cDNA clones were isolated using spinach NiR cDNA as a probe. Sequence analysis and Southern blot hybridization revealed four genes in tobacco. Two of these genes presumably derived from the ancestral species Nicotiana tomentosiformis, the other two from the ancestor N. sylvestris. Northern blot analysis showed that one gene from each ancestral genome was expressed predominantly in leaves, whilst RNA from the other was detected mostly in roots. The accumulation of both leaf and root NiR mRNAs was induced by nitrate and repressed by nitrate- or ammonium-derived metabolites. In addition, the expression of the root NiR gene was detectable in leaves of a tobacco nitrate reductase (NR)-deficient mutant. Thus, the regulation of expression of tobacco NiR genes is comparable to the regulation of expression of barley NR genes.