Diabetes Duration and the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine Versus Comparator Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of diabetes duration on efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using insulin glargine versus comparator (oral antidiabetic drugs [OADs], dietary changes, or other insulins).MethodsData were pooled from randomized controlled clinical trials conducted in adults with T2DM with at least 24-week treatment with insulin glargine or a comparator, where predefined insulin titration algorithms were utilized to achieve fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentrations of ≤ 100 mg/dL. Glycated hemoglobin A1C (A1C), FPG, and insulin dose and safety (hypoglycemia) outcomes were analyzed.ResultsNine studies were included in the analysis of 2,930 patients. Patients with shorter duration of diabetes were more likely to have greater reductions in A1C compared with those who had longer-duration disease (P < .0001). Disease duration did not affect change in FPG concentrations (P = .9017), but lower weight-adjusted insulin dose was correlated with longer-duration disease (P < .0001). Patients with longer-duration diabetes had increased risks of symptomatic hypoglycemia, confirmed hypoglycemia (self-monitored blood glucose < 50 mg/dL and < 70 mg/dL), and nocturnal hypoglycemia (all P < .001). No significant relationship was found between severe hypoglycemia and duration of diabetes. However, treatment with insulin glargine lowered A1C values more effectively than comparator treatments with fewer hypoglycemic episodes.ConclusionPatients with shorter-duration T2DM better achieved target A1C levels and had less hypoglycemia than those with longer disease duration. Insulin glargine was associated with reduced A1C and fewer hypoglycemic events than comparators, regardless of disease duration. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:120-128)     

Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide in Combination with Insulin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo evaluate the 1-year efficacy and safety of treatment with exenatide in combination with insulin (a use not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration).MethodsElectronic medical records of 3 private-practice endocrinologists were reviewed to identify patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving insulin who subsequently began exenatide therapy. Patients’ baseline hemoglobin A1c (A1C) levels, weights, lipid profiles, blood pressures, and medication utilization were compared with corresponding data obtained after a minimal duration of 12 months.ResultsWe identified 134 patients with T2DM initiating exenatide therapy in combination with insulin between April 2005 and April 2006. One-year follow-up information was available for 124 patients. Exenatide use resulted in a significant 0.87% reduction in A1C (P < .001), despite a 45% discontinuation of premeal insulin use (P < .001), a 9-U reduction in mean premeal insulin doses (P = .0066), a reduction in the median number of daily insulin injections from 2 to 1 (P = .0053), and a 59% discontinuation rate of sulfonylurea use (P = .0088). Exenatide use was associated with a mean weight loss of 5.2 kg (P < .001), with 72% of evaluable patients losing weight. Forty-eight patients (36%) discontinued exenatide therapy during the first year, primarily attributable to gastrointestinal intolerance. Fourteen patients (10%) experienced hypoglycemia, most of which was mild.ConclusionExenatide in combination with insulin in patients with T2DM was associated with significant reductions in A1C and weight after 1 year of therapy. This was offset, however, by an exenatide discontinuation rate of 36%, primarily due to adverse gastrointestinal effects. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:285-292)     

沙格列汀联合二甲双胍对2型糖尿病的疗效与安全性分析

目的:探讨沙格列汀联合二甲双胍对2型糖尿病的疗效与安全性。方法:选取200例2型糖尿病患者,按随机数字表法分为两组,沙格列汀组(102例)口服沙格列汀联合二甲双胍治疗,阿卡波糖组(98例)口服阿卡波糖联合二甲双胍治疗。通过观察并记录治疗前后糖代谢情况与体重指数水平,SF-36量表各项评分,治疗期间不良反应情况,评价沙格列汀联合二甲双胍对2型糖尿病的疗效与安全性。结果:治疗后,两组HbAlc,BMI,FBG,2hPBG水平均明显下降(P0.05),且沙格列汀组患者HbAlc,BMI,FBG,2 hPBG水平明显低于阿卡波糖组(P0.05);治疗后3个月两组患者SF-36表各项评分均明显提高(P0.05),但两组间差异没有统计学意义(P0.05);随访期间,两组不良反应率相比,差异没有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:沙格列汀联合二甲双胍可以明显控制患者血糖水平,减轻患者体重,提高患者生活质量用药安全性好,值得临床推广使用。     

Efficacy of High-Fiber Diets in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo review outcomes of randomized controlled clinical trials exploring the efficacy of different types of diets containing various amounts of fiber in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar for published data from the past decade (through December 2009) on dietary patterns and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Only randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of whole grains, fiber, or vegetarian diets on type 2 diabetes were included. Search criteria included whole grain, fruit, vegetable, fiber, and meat intake regarding insulin sensitivity and glycemic responses in healthy, prediabetic, and diabetic persons.ResultsA total of 14 randomized clinical trials were included. Addition of insoluble or soluble fiber to meals, increased consumption of diets rich in whole grains and vegetables, and vegan diets improve glucose metabolism and increase insulin sensitivity. The greatest improvement in blood lipids, body weight, and hemoglobin A_1c level occurred in participants following low-fat, plant-based diets.ConclusionsIncreased consumption of vegetables, whole grains, and soluble and insoluble fiber is associated with improved glucose metabolism in both diabetic and nondiabetic individuals. Improvements in insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis were more evident in participants following a plant-based diet compared with other commonly used diets. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:132-142)     

Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Older Adult: A Review

ObjectiveThis review summarizes the particular challenges of diabetes in older individuals and the evidence base guiding the selection of treatment targets and strategies in this population.MethodsAn in-depth literature search was conducted to identify the evidence base from randomized, controlled, and population-based epidemiological studies, as well as guidelines derived from expert opinion.ResultsOlder patients are a highly heterogeneous population with respect to the pathogenesis and course of diabetes and, as a group, manifest significant comorbidities that impact treatment goals and strategies. There is a lack of consensus regarding “optimal” glucose targets in older patients with diabetes. Hypoglycemia is more common in the older patient, contributes to increased morbidity and reduced quality of life, and limits treatment in many cases. Duration of diabetes, comorbidities, life expectancy, and functional status are other important factors to consider when identifying appropriate glycemic goals and choosing an antihyperglycemic agent for older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).ConclusionCurrent, limited treatment recommendations in older patients with T2DM are based on expert opinion due to the general lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials. This underscores the importance of individualizing pharmacologic therapy in these patients with a focus on the risk-to-benefit ratio. Additional trials in older patients are needed to assess drug safety, efficacy, and dosing. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:722-736)     

De-Intensification of Diabetes Treatment in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Objective: De-intensification of diabetes treatment is recommended in elderly patients with tight glycemic control at high risk of hypoglycemia. However, rates of de-intensification in endocrine practice are unknown. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the rate of de-intensification of antidiabetic treatment in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and tight glycemic control.Methods: All patients with ≥2 clinic visits over a 1-year period at a major academic diabetes center were included. De-intensification of diabetes treatment was defined as a decrease or discontinuation of any antidiabetic drug without adding another drug, or a reduction in the total daily dose of insulin or a sulfonylurea drug with or without adding a drug without risk of hypoglycemia.Results: Out of 3,186 unique patients, 492 were ≥65 years old with T2DM and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7.5% (<58 mmol/mol). We found 308 patients treated with a sulfonylurea drug or insulin, 102 of whom had hypoglycemia as per physician note. Among these 102 patients, 38 (37%) were advised to de-intensify therapy. In a subgroup analysis of patients ≥75 years old with HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol), we found that out of 23 patients treated with a sulfonylurea drug or insulin and reporting hypoglycemia, 11 (43%) were advised de-intensification of therapy. There were no significant predictors of de-intensification of treatment.Conclusion: Our study suggests that de-intensification of antidiabetic medications is uncommon in elderly patients with T2DM. Strategies may need to be developed to prevent the potential harm of overtreatment in this population.Abbreviations: ADA = American Diabetes Association; CGM = continuous glucose monitoring; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; UKPDS = United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study     

基因技术在治疗2型糖尿病中的应用*

2型糖尿病(type 2 diabetes mellitus, T2DM)是一类由于胰岛β细胞损伤和机体对胰岛素耐受引发的慢性代谢性疾病,其快速增长的患病率和并发症所带来的高病死率已成为人类面临的医学难题。目前,T2DM主要是以降糖药物及胰岛素增敏剂等药物进行治疗,但是这类药物会产生严重的副作用,而且不能长期良好控制血糖和防止各种慢性并发症。因此,基因治疗是未来医疗发展的主要方向。基因治疗不仅可以靶向调控血糖水平进而提高降糖的效果,而且能够减少糖代谢异常引起的并发症,保护组织器官免受损伤。在认识传统药物治疗糖尿病的基础上,综述了基因技术在治疗T2DM中的应用,讨论了基因技术治疗T2DM的意义及存在的问题。基因技术的应用不仅有利于T2DM的预防和个体化治疗,同时也为糖尿病并发症提供了新的治疗途径。     

基因技术在治疗2型糖尿病中的应用*

2型糖尿病(type 2 diabetes mellitus, T2DM)是一类由于胰岛β细胞损伤和机体对胰岛素耐受引发的慢性代谢性疾病,其快速增长的患病率和并发症所带来的高病死率已成为人类面临的医学难题。目前,T2DM主要是以降糖药物及胰岛素增敏剂等药物进行治疗,但是这类药物会产生严重的副作用,而且不能长期良好控制血糖和防止各种慢性并发症。因此,基因治疗是未来医疗发展的主要方向。基因治疗不仅可以靶向调控血糖水平进而提高降糖的效果,而且能够减少糖代谢异常引起的并发症,保护组织器官免受损伤。在认识传统药物治疗糖尿病的基础上,综述了基因技术在治疗T2DM中的应用,讨论了基因技术治疗T2DM的意义及存在的问题。基因技术的应用不仅有利于T2DM的预防和个体化治疗,同时也为糖尿病并发症提供了新的治疗途径。     

罗格列酮联合胰岛素治疗老年2型糖尿病的临床研究

目的 观察罗格列酮联合胰岛素治疗老年2型糖尿病的疗效及安全性.方法 将60例老年2型糖尿病患者随机分为治疗组和对照组各30例,治疗组用罗格列酮4 mg/d,同时加用胰岛素;两组均随访12周,观测血糖、胰岛素用量指标变化及药物的不良反应;对照组单用胰岛素治疗并根据病情调整用量.结果 治疗组血糖水平从第2周开始明显下降,第8～12周血糖水平降幅最大,有21例达到空腹血糖＜6.5 mmol/L,餐后2 h血糖＜8.0 mmol/L的良好控制水平;从第2周开始,治疗组胰岛素用量也逐渐减少,至12周时,治疗组胰岛素用量较基础值减少(7.6±4.3)u;而对照组胰岛素用量却平均增加(9.1±5.1)u.治疗后两组血糖和胰岛素用量比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 罗格列酮联合胰岛素治疗老年2型糖尿病能有效控制患者的血糖水平,且安全,无不良反应.     

Serum Amyloid A Truncations in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Serum Amyloid A (SAA) is an acute phase protein complex consisting of several abundant isoforms. The N- terminus of SAA is critical to its function in amyloid formation. SAA is frequently truncated, either missing an arginine or an arginine-serine dipeptide, resulting in isoforms that may influence the capacity to form amyloid. However, the relative abundance of truncated SAA in diabetes and chronic kidney disease is not known.

Methods

Using mass spectrometric immunoassay, the abundance of SAA truncations relative to the native variants was examined in plasma of 91 participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease and 69 participants without diabetes.

Results

The ratio of SAA 1.1 (missing N-terminal arginine) to native SAA 1.1 was lower in diabetics compared to non-diabetics (p = 0.004), and in males compared to females (p<0.001). This ratio was negatively correlated with glycated hemoglobin (r = −0.32, p<0.001) and triglyceride concentrations (r = −0.37, p<0.001), and positively correlated with HDL cholesterol concentrations (r = 0.32, p<0.001).

Conclusion

The relative abundance of the N-terminal arginine truncation of SAA1.1 is significantly decreased in diabetes and negatively correlates with measures of glycemic and lipid control.     

Efficacy and Safety of Ideglira in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Objective: The efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) in older patients has not yet been reported. This analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IDegLira in patients aged ≥65 years.Methods: A post hoc analysis compared results of patients aged ≥65 versus <65 years from DUAL II, III, and V. These were 26-week, phase 3, randomized, twoarm parallel, treat-to-target trials in patients already taking injectable glucose-lowering agents. We evaluated 311 patients aged <65 and 87 patients aged ≥65 years from DUAL II, 326 patients <65 years and 112 patients ≥65 years from DUAL III, and 412 patients <65 years and 145 patients ≥65 years from DUAL V. Patients were randomized to IDegLira or insulin degludec (DUAL II), IDegLira or unchanged glucagon-like peptide 1–receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) (DUAL III), or IDegLira or IGlar U100 (DUAL V).Results: In patients ≥65 years, hemoglobin A1C decreased to a greater extent with IDegLira than with comparators (estimated treatment differences, -1.0% &lsqb;-1.5; -0.6]_{95% confidence interval &lsqb;CI]}, -0.8% &lsqb;-1.0; -0.5]_{95% CI}, and -0.9% &lsqb;-1.3; -0.6]95%CI) for DUAL II, V, and III, respectively; all P<.001). These mirrored results of patients <65 years of age. Hypoglycemia rates were lower with IDegLira versus basal insulin and higher versus unchanged GLP-1RA (estimated rate ratios, 0.5 &lsqb;0.2; 1.6]_{95% CI} &lsqb;P = .242]; 0.3 &lsqb;0.1; 0.5]_{95% CI} &lsqb;P<.001], and 11.8 &lsqb;3.3; 42.8]_{95% CI} &lsqb;P<.001] for DUAL II, V, and III, respectively).Conclusion: Patients aged ≥65 years on basal insulin or GLP-1RA can improve glycemic control with IDegLira, and it is well tolerated overall.Abbreviations: A1C = hemoglobin A1C; AE = adverse event; CI = confidence interval; Degludec = insulin degludec; EOT = end of trial; ETD = estimated treatment difference; FPG = fasting plasma glucose; GLP-1RA = glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist; IDegLira = insulin degludec/liraglutide; IGlar U100 = insulin glargine 100 U/mL; SU = sulfonylurea; T2D = type 2 diabetes     

Efficacy and Safety of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Moderate to Severe Renal Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DDP-4) inhibitors (“gliptins”) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with moderate to severe renal impairment.

Methods

All available randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy and safety of DDP-4 inhibitors compared with placebo, no treatment, or active drugs were identified using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, conference abstracts, clinical trials.gov, pharmaceutical company websites, the FDA, and the EMA (up to June 2014). Two independent reviewers extracted the data, and a random-effects model was applied to estimate summary effects.

Results

Thirteen reports of ten studies with a total of 1,915 participants were included in the final analysis. Compared with placebo or no treatment, DPP-4 inhibitors reduced HbA1c significantly (−0.52%, 95%CI −0.64 to −0.39) and had no increased risk of hypoglycemia (RR 1.10, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.32) or weight gain. In contrast to glipizide monotherapy, DPP-4 inhibitors showed no difference in HbA1c lowering effect (−0.08%, 95% CI −0.40 to 0.25) but had a lower incidence of hypoglycemia (RR 0.40, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.69). Furthermore, DPP-4 inhibitors were well-tolerated, without any additional mortality and adverse events. However, the quality of evidence was mostly as low, as assessed using the GRADE system for each outcome.

Conclusions

DPP-4 inhibitors are effective at lowering HbA1c in T2DM patients with moderate to severe renal impairment. DPP-4 inhibitors also have a potential advantage in lowering the risk of adverse events. Regarding the low quality of the evidence according to GRADE, additional well-designed randomized trials that focus on the safety and efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitors in various CKD stages are needed urgently.     

2型糖尿病继发Foumier坏疽的诊断及治疗

目的：总结2型糖尿病、糖尿病酮症酸中毒继发Foumier坏疽的诊断及治疗经验。方法：回顾性分析2型糖尿病、糖尿病酮症酸中毒继发Foumier坏疽患者的主要症状及诊治情况,结合文献对该病的临床表现、诊断、治疗及预后进行讨论。结果：患者经控制血糖、外科清创、抗感染等综合治疗后痊愈。结论：早期诊断,良好控制血糖,纠正酸中毒,彻底清创,联合应用抗生素治疗等全身综合治疗,是治愈本病的关键。     

Treatment of Hypogonadism with Testosterone in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of testosterone treatment on insulin resistance, glycemic control, and dyslipidemia in Asian Indian men with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypogonadism.MethodsWe conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 22 men, 25 to 50 years old, with T2DM and hypogonadism. Patients were treated with intramuscularly administered testosterone (200 mg every 15 days) or placebo for 3 months in random order, followed by a washout period of 1 month before the alternative treatment phase. The primary outcomes were changes in fasting insulin sensitivity (as measured by homeostasis model assessment [HOMA] in those patients not receiving insulin), fasting blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1c. The secondary outcomes were changes in fasting lipids, blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and androgen deficiency symptoms. Statistical analysis was performed on the delta values, with the treatment effect of placebo compared with the effect of testosterone.ResultsTreatment with testosterone did not significantly influence insulin resistance measured by the HOMA index (mean treatment effect, 1.67 ± 4.29; confidence interval, -6.91 to 10.25; P > .05). Mean change in hemoglobin A1c (%) (-1.75 ± 5.35; -12.46 to 8.95) and fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) (20.20 ± 67.87; -115.54 to 155.94) also did not reach statistical significance. Testosterone treatment did not affect fasting lipids, blood pressure, and anthropometric determinations significantly.ConclusionIn this study, testosterone treatment showed a neutral effect on insulin resistance and glycemic control and failed to improve dyslipidemia, control blood pressure, or reduce visceral fat significantly in Asian Indian men with T2DM and hypogonadism. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:570-576)     

2型糖尿病继发Fournier坏疽的诊断及治疗

目的:总结2型糖尿病、糖尿病酮症酸中毒继发Foumier坏疽的诊断及治疗经验.方法:回顾性分析2型糖尿病、糖尿病酮症酸中毒继发Foumier坏疽患者的主要症状及诊治情况,结合文献对该病的临床表现、诊断、治疗及预后进行讨论.结果:患者经控制血糖、外科清创、抗感染等综合治疗后痊愈.结论:早期诊断,良好控制血糖,纠正酸中毒,彻底清创,联合应用抗生素治疗等全身综合治疗,是治愈本病的关键.     

A Stepwise Approach to Insulin Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Basal Insulin Treatment Failure

ObjectiveTo determine whether 1 or 2 preprandial injections before the meals of greatest glycemic impact can be as effective as 3 preprandial injections in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and basal insulin treatment failure.MethodsThis was an open-label, parallel-group, 1:1:1 randomized study of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus on oral antidiabetic drugs with glycated hemoglobin (A1C) levels of 8.0% or greater. After a 14week run-in with insulin glargine, patients with an A1C level greater than 7.0% were randomly assigned to 1, 2, or 3 time(s) daily insulin glulisine for 24 weeks. Changes in A1C from randomization to study end; percentage of patients achieving an A1C level less than 7.0%; changes in A1C, fasting glucose concentrations, and weight at individual study points; and safety (adverse events and hypoglycemia) were assessed throughout the study.ResultsThree hundred forty-three of 631 patients (54%) completing the run-in phase with insulin glargine were randomly assigned to treatment arms. During the randomization phase, A1C reductions with insulin glulisine once or twice daily were noninferior to insulin glulisine 3 times daily (confidence intervals: -0.39 to 0.36 and -0.30 to 0.43; P > .5 for both). However, more patients met the target A1C with 3 preprandial injections (46 [46%]) than with 2 injections (34 [33%]) or 1 injection (30 [30%]). Severe hypoglycemia occurred in twice as many patients receiving 3 preprandial injections (16%) compared with those receiving 2 injections (8%) and 1 injection (7%), but these differences did not reach significance.ConclusionThis study provides evidence that initiation of prandial insulin in a simplified stepwise approach is an effective alternative to the current routine 3 preprandial injection basal-bolus approach. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:395-403)     

2 型糖尿病治疗药物研究进展

2 型糖尿病（T2DM）是一种代谢障碍性疾病。传统抗糖尿病药物具有不同程度的副作用,如低血糖、胃肠道反应、体重增加、 心血管风险等,因此开发作用于新靶点和新作用机制的T2DM 治疗新药成为当前研究的热点。目前基于新靶点设计的糖尿病治疗新药有 些已上市,且获得良好的降糖效果,但大部分药物仍处于临床或临床前研究阶段,其疗效和安全性有待进一步临床验证。综述传统抗糖 尿病药物、T2DM 药物新靶点及基于新靶点设计的抗糖尿病新药的研究进展。     

依达拉奉联合银杏达莫治疗2型糖尿病合并急性脑梗塞的临床效果分析

目的:本研究旨在探究2型糖尿病合并急性脑梗死的临床疗效。方法:对我市医院门诊及住院部在2014年1月至2015年9月间收录的358例2型糖尿病合并急性脑梗塞患者的治疗情况进行,依照患者治疗方法的差异,将本组患者分成两组,分别是对照组和观察组,对照组实施常规糖尿病及脑梗塞治疗,观察组在其基础上加用依达拉奉联合银杏达莫治疗,持续治疗3周后,评估治疗效果。结果:治疗三周后,两组患者的椎基底动脉血流速度均有明显改善(P0.05),观察组的改善程度较对照组更为显著(P0.05);观察组患者的神经功能缺损评分为(10.96±2.4)分,对照组为(16.21±3.1)分,则观察组患者神经功能显著由于对照组(P0.05);观察组患者临床治疗有效率为95.35%,对照组为72.03%,则观察组治疗有效率显著高于对照组,且具有统计学意义(P0.05);对照组的平均住院时间为(4.2±1.3)周,观察组的平均住院时间为(2.8±0.9)周。结论:对于2型糖尿病合并急性脑梗塞患者,在临床综合治疗的基础上加用依达拉奉联合银杏达莫治疗效果显著,能够显著提升患者椎基底动脉的血流速度,改善神经功能缺损,提高临床治疗效果,具有较大推广应用优势及价值。