Modification of the zone of polarizing activity signal by trypsin

Patterning of the developing vertebrate limb along the anterior‐posterior axis is controlled by the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA) via the expression of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) and along the proximal‐distal axis by the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) through the production of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs). ZPA grafting, as well as ectopic application of SHH to the anterior chick limb bud, demonstrate that digit patterning is largely influenced by these secreted factors. Although signal transduction pathways have been well characterized for SHH and for FGFs, little is known of how these signals are regulated extracellularly in the limb. The present study shows that alteration of the extracellular environment through trypsin treatment can have profound effects on digit patterning. These effects appear to be mediated by the induction of Shh in host tissues and by ectopic AER formation, implicating the extracellular matrix in regulating the signaling activities of key patterning genes in the limb.     

In the limb AER Bmp2 and Bmp4 are required for dorsal-ventral patterning and interdigital cell death but not limb outgrowth

The apical ectodermal ridge (AER) in the vertebrate limb is required for limb outgrowth and patterning. To investigate the role BMP ligands expressed in the AER play in limb development we selectively inactivated both Bmp2 and Bmp4 in this tissue. The autopods of mice lacking both of these genes contained extra digits, digit bifurcations and interdigital webbing due to a decrease in programmed cell death and an increase in cell proliferation in the underlying mesoderm. Upon removal of Bmp2 and Bmp4 in the AER, no defects in proximal-distal patterning were observed. At the molecular level, removal of Bmp2 and Bmp4 in the AER caused an increase in Fgf expression, which correlated with an increase in both the width and length of the AER. Investigation of Engrailed-1 (En1) expression in the AER of limb buds in which Bmp2 and Bmp4 had been removed indicated that En1 expression was absent from this tissue. Our data suggests that AER expression of Bmp2 and Bmp4 is required for digit and dorsal-ventral patterning but surprisingly not for limb outgrowth.     

Lizards possess the most complete tetrapod Hox gene repertoire despite pervasive structural changes in Hox clusters

Hox genes are a remarkable example of conservation in animal development and their nested expression along the head‐to‐tail axis orchestrates embryonic patterning. Early in vertebrate history, two duplications led to the emergence of four Hox clusters (A‐D) and redundancy within paralog groups has been partially accommodated with gene losses. Here we conduct an inventory of squamate Hox genes using the genomes of 10 lizard and 7 snake species. Although the HoxC1 gene has been hypothesized to be lost in the amniote ancestor, we reveal that it is retained in lizards. In contrast, all snakes lack functional HoxC1 and ‐D12 genes. Varying levels of degradation suggest differences in the process of gene loss between the two genes. The vertebrate HoxC1 gene is prone to gene loss and its functional domains are more variable than those of other Hox1 genes. We describe for the first time the HoxC1 expression patterns in tetrapods. HoxC1 is broadly expressed during development in the diencephalon, the neural tube, dorsal root ganglia, and limb buds in two lizard species. Our study emphasizes the value of revisiting Hox gene repertoires by densely sampling taxonomic groups and its feasibility owing to growing sequence resources in evaluating gene repertoires across taxa.     

Climate as a driver of tropical insular diversity: comparative phylogeography of two ecologically distinctive frogs in Puerto Rico

The effects of late Quaternary climate on distributions and evolutionary dynamics of insular species are poorly understood in most tropical archipelagoes. We used ecological niche models under past and current climate to derive hypotheses regarding how stable climatic conditions shaped genetic diversity in two ecologically distinctive frogs in Puerto Rico. Whereas the mountain coquí Eleutherodactylus portoricensis is restricted to montane forest in the Cayey and Luquillo Mountains, the red‐eyed coquí E. antillensis is a habitat generalist distributed across the entire Puerto Rican Bank (Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, excluding St Croix). To test our hypotheses, we conducted phylogeographic and population genetic analyses based on mitochondrial and nuclear loci of each species across their range in Puerto Rico. Patterns of population differentiation in E. portoricensis, but not in E. antillensis, supported our hypotheses. For E. portoricensis, these patterns include: individuals isolated by long‐term unsuitable climate in the Río Grande de Loíza Basin in eastern Puerto Rico belong to different genetic clusters; past and current climate strongly predicted genetic differentiation; and Cayey and Luquillo Mountains populations split prior to the last interglacial. For E. antillensis, these patterns include: genetic clusters did not fully correspond to predicted long‐term unsuitable climate; and past and current climate weakly predicted patterns of genetic differentiation. Genetic signatures in E. antillensis are consistent with a recent range expansion into western Puerto Rico, possibly resulting from climate change and anthropogenic influences. As predicted, regions with a large area of long‐term suitable climate were associated with higher genetic diversity in both species, suggesting larger and more stable populations. Finally, we discussed the implications of our findings for developing evidence‐based management decisions for E. portoricensis, a taxon of special concern. Our findings illustrate the role of persistent suitable climatic conditions in promoting the persistence and diversification of tropical island organisms.     

Dorso-ventral limb polarity and origin of the ridge: On the fringe of independence?

Molecular and developmental studies of limb pattern formation have recently gained widespread attention. The fact that vertebrate limbs are amenable to both genetic and embryological manipulations has established this model system as a valuable paradigm for studying vertebrate development. Limb buds are polarised along all three major axes and the establishment of the dorso-ventral (DV) polarity is dependent upon cues localised in the trunk, where a DV ectodermal interface is produced by confrontation of dorsal and ventral identities. By analogy to Drosophila imaginal disc development, this interface has been proposed to determine and position an ectodermal organising centre, the Apical Ectodermal Ridge (AER), controlling limb bud outgrowth. Recent fate mapping studies⁽¹⁾ and studies of genes regulating DV limb polarity^(2-6), AER formation^(7,8) and differentiation⁽⁹⁾ suggest, however, that DV patterning and AER induction, though coordinately regulated during limb bud outgrowth, may early on be more dissociated than expected.     

Early limb patterning in the direct‐developing salamander Plethodon cinereus revealed by sox9 and col2a1

Direct‐developing amphibians form limbs during early embryonic stages, as opposed to the later, often postembryonic limb formation of metamorphosing species. Limb patterning is dramatically altered in direct‐developing frogs, but little attention has been given to direct‐developing salamanders. We use expression patterns of two genes, sox9 and col2a1, to assess skeletal patterning during embryonic limb development in the direct‐developing salamander Plethodon cinereus. Limb patterning in P. cinereus partially resembles that described in other urodele species, with early formation of digit II and a generally anterior‐to‐posterior formation of preaxial digits. Unlike other salamanders described to date, differentiation of preaxial zeugopodial cartilages (radius/tibia) is not accelerated in relation to the postaxial cartilages, and there is no early differentiation of autopodial elements in relation to more proximal cartilages. Instead, digit II forms in continuity with the ulnar/fibular arch. This amniote‐like connectivity to the first digit that forms may be a consequence of the embryonic formation of limbs in this direct‐developing species. Additionally, and contrary to recent models of amphibian digit identity, there is no evidence of vestigial digits. This is the first account of gene expression in a plethodontid salamander and only the second published account of embryonic limb patterning in a direct‐developing salamander species.     

Comprehensive expression analysis of all Wnt genes and their major secreted antagonists during mouse limb development and cartilage differentiation

Wnt signalling plays important roles in patterning and outgrowth of the vertebrate limb. Different mutations in Wnt genes, their antagonists or (co-)receptors result in patterning and outgrowth defects as well as chondrocyte and bone phenotypes in mouse and human. Understanding Wnt activity during mouse limb development and chondrogenesis requires a temporal and spatial overview of Wnt signalling key factor expression. Here we present a comparative expression analysis of all 19 Wnt genes and their major secreted antagonists of the Dickkopf (Dkk), Wisp and the secreted frizzled related protein (Sfrp) families during mouse limb development. Our study reveals new domains of expression for Wnt2, Wnt2b, Wnt5b, Wnt6, Wnt7b, Wnt9a, Wnt10a, Wnt10b, Wnt11 and Wnt16, in the limb. We also identified novel expression domains for the Wnt antagonists Sfrp1, Sfrp3, Sfrp5, Wisp1 as well as Dkk2 and Dkk3. We provide a full expression pattern for Wif1 in limb development, for which no limb expression had been documented so far.     

Development of the head and trunk mesoderm in the dogfish,Scyliorhinus torazame: II. Comparison of gene expression between the head mesoderm and somites with reference to the origin of the vertebrate head

The vertebrate mesoderm differs distinctly between the head and trunk, and the evolutionary origin of the head mesoderm remains enigmatic. Although the presence of somite‐like segmentation in the head mesoderm of model animals is generally denied at molecular developmental levels, the appearance of head cavities in elasmobranch embryos has not been explained, and the possibility that they may represent vestigial head somites once present in an amphioxus‐like ancestor has not been ruled out entirely. To examine whether the head cavities in the shark embryo exhibit any molecular signatures reminiscent of trunk somites, we isolated several developmentally key genes, including Pax1, Pax3, Pax7, Pax9, Myf5, Sonic hedgehog, and Patched2, which are involved in myogenic and chondrogenic differentiation in somites, and Pitx2, Tbx1, and Engrailed2, which are related to the patterning of the head mesoderm, from an elasmobranch species, Scyliorhinus torazame. Observation of the expression patterns of these genes revealed that most were expressed in patterns that resembled those found in amniote embryos. In addition, the head cavities did not exhibit an overt similarity to somites; that is, the similarity was no greater than that of the unsegmented head mesoderm in other vertebrates. Moreover, the shark head mesoderm showed an amniote‐like somatic/visceral distinction according to the expression of Pitx2, Tbx1, and Engrailed2. We conclude that the head cavities do not represent a manifestation of ancestral head somites; rather, they are more likely to represent a derived trait obtained in the lineage of gnathostomes.     

FGF10 can induce Fgf8 expression concomitantly with En1 and R-fng expression in chick limb ectoderm, independent of its dorsoventral specification

The limb bud has a thickened epithelium at the dorsal-ventral boundary, the apical ectodermal ridge (AER), which sustains limb outgrowth and patterning. A secreted molecule fibroblast growth factor (FGF)10 is involved in inducing Fgf8 expression in the prospective AER and mutual interaction between mesenchymal FGF10 and FGF8 in the AER is essential for limb outgrowth. A secreted factor Wnt7a and a homeobox protein Lmx1 are involved in the dorsal patterning of the limb, whereas a homeobox protein Engrailed 1 (En1) is involved in the dorsal-ventral patterning as well as AER formation. Radical fringe (R-fng), a vertebrate homolog of Drosophila fringe was also found to elaborate AER formation in chicks. However, little is known about the molecular interactions between these factors during AER formation. The present study clarified the relationship between FGF10, Wnt7a, Lmx1, R-fng and En1 during limb development using a foil-barrier insertion experiment. It was found that a foil-barrier inserted into the chick prospective wing mesenchyme lateral to the mesonephric duct blocks AER induction. This experiment was expanded by implanting Fgf10-expressing cells lateral to the barrier and examined whether FGF10 could rescue the expression of the limb-patterning genes reported in AER formation. It was found that FGF10 is sufficient to induce Fgf8 expression in the ectoderm of the foil-inserted limb bud, concomitantly with R-fng and En1 expression. However, FGF10 could not rescue the expression of the dorsal marker genes, Wnt7a or Lmx1. Thus, it is suggested that epithelial factors of En1 and R-fng can induce Fgf8 expression in the limb ectoderm in cooperation with a mesenchymal factor FGF10. Some factor(s) other than FGF10, possibly from the paraxial structures medial to the limb mesoderm, is responsible for the initial dorsal-ventral specification of the limb bud.     

Function of FGF-4 in limb development

The apical ectodermal ridge plays a central role in limb development through its interactions with the underlying mesenchyme. Removal of the AER results in cessation of limb outgrowth and leads to truncation of the limb along the proximo-distal axis. The many functions attributed to the ridge include maintenance of the progress zone mesenchyme. Here, cells are stimulated to proliferate, are maintained in an undifferentiated state, and are assigned progressively more distal positional values as the limb grows. The AER also functions to maintain the activity of the polarizing region, a region of mesenchyme which is thought to provide the primary signal for patterning along the antero-posterior axis. We have begun to explore the function of fibroblast growth factor-4 (FGF-4) during limb development. FGF-4, which encodes an efficiently secreted protein, is expressed in the AER. We have previously demonstrated that FGF-4 protein can stimulate limb mesenchyme proliferation and can induce the expression of a downstream homeobox gene, Evx-1 (homologue of the Drosophila even-skipped gene), that is normally regulated by a signal from the AER. To determine to what extent FGF-4 protein can substitute for the AER to allow normal limb outgrowth, we performed experiments on the developing chick limb in ovo. Remarkably, we find that after AER removal, the FGF-4 protein can provide all the signals required for virtually normal outgrowth and patterning of the limb. Further studies indicate that proliferation of progress zone cells is not sufficient, and that an additional signal is produced by the posterior mesenchyme in response to FGF-4 which enables progress zone cells to acquire progressively more distal fates. Thus FGF-4 maintains progress zone activity through a combination of at least two signals—one that acts directly on progress zone cells to stimulate their proliferation, and one that acts indirectly by maintaining the production of patterning signal(s) by the posterior mesenchyme. We further show that failure of the posterior mesenchyme to produce this signal correlates with failure to maintain polarizing activity. This raises the possibility that the signal produced by the posterior mesenchyme and required for progressive proximo-distal limb patterning is identical to the polarizing activity. Further experiments demonstrate that retinoic acid, which mimics the activity of the polarizing region, can supply this signal. In conclusion, the finding that a single growth factor can serve as both the direct and indirect signals required to maintain progress zone activity provides a simple mechanism for ensuring that growth and pattern formation are linked in the developing limb. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Expression of TGFβ3 RNA during chick embryogenesis: a possible important role in cardiovascular development

Formin was originally isolated as the gene affected by the murine limb deformity (ld) mutations, which disrupt the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions regulating patterning of the vertebrate limb autopod. More recently, a rapidly growing number of genes with similarity to formin have been isolated from many different species including fungi and plants. Genetic and biochemical analysis shows that formin family members function in cellular processes regulating either cytokinesis and/or cell polarisation. Another common feature among formin family members is their requirement in morphogenetic processes such as budding and conjugation of yeast, establishment of Drosophila oocyte polarity and vertebrate limb pattern formation. Vertebrate formins are predominantly nuclear proteins which control polarising activity in limb buds through establishment of the SHH/FGF-4 feedback loop. Formin acts in the limb bud mesenchyme to induce apical ectodermal ridge (AER) differentiation and FGF-4 expression in the posterior AER compartment. Finally, disruption of the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions controlling induction of metanephric kidneys in ld mutant embryos indicates that formin might function more generally in transduction of morphogenetic signals during embryonic pattern formation. Received: 24 September 1998 / Accepted: 30 September 1998     

Comparative analysis of the expression patterns of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Wnts</Emphasis> during chick limb development

Wnts control a number of processes during limb development—from initiating outgrowth and controlling patterning, to regulating cell differentiation in a number of tissues. We analyzed the expression pattern of various Wnts (4, 5a, 5b, 6, 11, and 14) in whole mount in situ hybridization during chick wing development. From HH stage 26, expression of Wnt 4 is observed in the central elbow region and wrist-forming regions, and during later stages, expression is seen in the joint-forming regions of the whole limb. Wnt 5a is expressed throughout the limb mesenchyme during early limb developmental stages, and later, at HH stage 23, it becomes predominantly confined to the distal tip, leaving low expression levels proximally. At HH stage 29, expression at the distal tip is restricted to the interdigital regions, and at day 8, expression is seen in the region surrounding the phalanges. Wnt 5b expression is first observed in the AER at HH stage 20 and later in the dorsal and ventral mesenchyme surrounding the cartilage elements of the limb. Expression of Wnt 6 is observed from HH stage 17 until day 8 in the dorsal and ventral ectoderm and also in the dorsoventral limb boundaries. Expression of Wnt 11 is observed in the proximal dorsal mesenchyme of the limb from HH stage 23 onward and later in the dorsal and ventral subectodermal mesenchyme and in the regions adjacent to the digits at day 8. Weak expression of Wnt 14 is observed at the proximal mesenchyme of the limb at HH stage 23; later, it extends as a transverse strip surrounding the cartilage elements as well as in the interdigital mesenchyme.This paper is dedicated to Professor Dr. W. Zenker on the occasion of his 80th birthday.     

Distinct signaling molecules control Hoxa-11 and Hoxa-13 expression in the muscle precursor and mesenchyme of the chick limb bud.

The limb muscles, originating from the ventrolateral portion of the somites, exhibit position-specific morphological development through successive splitting and growth/differentiation of the muscle masses in a region-specific manner by interacting with the limb mesenchyme and the cartilage elements. The molecular mechanisms that provide positional cues to the muscle precursors are still unknown. We have shown that the expression patterns of Hoxa-11 and Hoxa-13 are correlated with muscle patterning of the limb bud (Yamamoto et al., 1998) and demonstrated that muscular Hox genes are activated by signals from the limb mesenchyme. We dissected the regulatory mechanisms directing the unique expression patterns of Hoxa-11 and Hoxa-13 during limb muscle development. HOXA-11 protein was detected in both the myogenic cells and the zeugopodal mesenchymal cells of the limb bud. The earlier expression of HOXA-11 in both the myogenic precursor cells and the mesenchyme was dependent on the apical ectodermal ridge (AER), but later expression was independent of the AER. HOXA-11 expression in both myogenic precursor cells and mesenchyme was induced by fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signal, whereas hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) maintained HOXA-11 expression in the myogenic precursor cells, but not in the mesenchyme. The distribution of HOXA-13 protein expression in the muscle masses was restricted to the posterior region. We found that HOXA-13 expression in the autopodal mesenchyme was dependent on the AER but not on the polarizing region, whereas expression of HOXA-13 in the posterior muscle masses was dependent on the polarizing region but not on the AER. Administration of BMP-2 at the anterior margin of the limb bud induced ectopic HOXA-13 expression in the anterior region of the muscle masses followed by ectopic muscle formation close to the source of exogenous BMP-2. In addition, NOGGIN/CHORDIN, antagonists of BMP-2 and BMP-4, downregulated the expression of HOXA-13 in the posterior region of the muscle masses and inhibited posterior muscle development. These results suggested that HOXA-13 expression in the posterior muscle masses is activated by the posteriorizing signal from the posterior mesenchyme via BMP-2. On the contrary, the expression of HOXA-13 in the autopodal mesenchyme was affected by neither BMP-2 nor NOGGIN/CHORDIN. Thus, mesenchymal HOXA-13 expression was independent of BMP-2 from polarizing region, but was under the control of as yet unidentified signals from the AER. These results showed that expression of Hox genes is regulated differently in the limb muscle precursor and mesenchymal cells.     

FLRT3 as a key player on chick limb development

Limb outgrowth is maintained by a specialized group of cells, the apical ectodermal ridge (AER), a thickening of the limb epithelium at its distal tip. It has been shown that fibroblast growth factor (FGF) activity and activation of the Erk pathway are crucial for AER function. Recently, FLRT3, a transmembrane protein able to interact with FGF receptors, has been implicated in the activation of ERK by FGFs. In this study, we show that flrt3 expression is restricted to the AER, co-localizing its expression with fgf8 and pERK activity. Loss-of-function studies have shown that silencing of flrt3 affects the integrity of the AER and, subsequently, its proper function during limb bud outgrowth. Our data also indicate that flrt3 expression is not regulated by FGF activity in the AER, whereas ectopic WNT3A is able to induce flrt3 expression. Overall, our findings show that flrt3 is a key player during chicken limb development, being necessary but not sufficient for proper AER formation and maintenance under the control of BMP and WNT signalling.     

Conservation, innovation, and the evolution of horned beetle diversity

Beetle horns represent an evolutionary novelty exhibiting remarkable diversity above and below the species level. Here, we show that four typical appendage patterning genes, extradenticle (exd), homothorax (hth), dachshund (dac), and Distal-less (Dll) are expressed in the context of the development of sexually dimorphic thoracic horns in three Onthophagus species. At least two of these genes, Dll and hth, exhibited expression patterns consistent with a conservation of patterning function during horn development relative to their known roles in the development of insect legs. exd, hth, and dac expression patterns during horn development were largely invariable across species or sexes within species. In contrast, Dll expression was far more discrete and exhibited consistent differences between sexes and species. Most importantly, differences in location and domain size of Dll expression tightly correlated with the degree to which prepupal horn primordia were retained or resorbed before the final adult molt. Our results lend further support to the hypothesis that the origin of beetle horns relied, at least in part, on the redeployment of already existing developmental mechanisms, such as appendage patterning processes and that changes in the exact location and domain size of Dll expression may represent important modifier mechanisms that modulate horn expression in different species or sexes. If correct, this would imply that certain components of genetic basis of horn development may be able to diversify rapidly within lineages and largely independent of phylogenetic distance. We present a first model that integrates presently available data on the genetic regulation of horn development and diversity.