Solution structure of a sweet protein single-chain monellin determined by nuclear magnetic resonance and dynamical simulated annealing calculations

Single-chain monellin (SCM), which is an engineered 94-residue polypeptide, has proven to be as sweet as native two-chain monellin. SCM is more stable than the native monellin for both heat and acidic environments. Data from gel filtration HPLC and NMR indicate that the SCM exists as a monomer in aqueous solution. The solution structure of SCM has been determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and dynamical simulated annealing calculations. A stable alpha-helix spanning residues Phe11-Ile26 and an antiparallel beta-sheet formed by residues 2-5, 36-38, 41-47, 54-64, 69-75, and 83-88 have been identified. The sheet was well defined by backbone-backbone NOEs, and the corresponding beta-strands were further confirmed by hydrogen bond networks based on amide hydrogen exchange data. Strands beta2 and beta3 are connected by a small bulge comprising residues Ile38-Cys41. A total of 993 distance and 56 dihedral angle restraints were used for simulated annealing calculations. The final simulated annealing structures (k) converged well with a root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) between backbone atoms of 0.49 A for secondary structural regions and 0.70 A for backbone atoms excluding two loop regions. The average restraint energy-minimized (REM) structure exhibited root-mean-square deviations of 1.19 A for backbone atoms and 0.85 A for backbone atoms excluding two loop regions with respect to 20 k structures. The solution structure of SCM revealed that the long alpha-helix was folded into the concave side of a six-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet. The side chains of Tyr63 and Asp66 which are common to all sweet peptides showed an opposite orientation relative to H1 helix, and they were all solvent-exposed. Residues at the proposed dimeric interface in the X-ray structure were observed to be mostly solvent-exposed and demonstrated high degrees of flexibility.     

Conformational transitions of monellin, an intensely sweet protein.

Conformational transitions of monellin, an intensely sweet protein from the berries of Dioscoreophyllum cumminsii, were studied by the circular dichroism (CD) probe. According to the CD spectra, monellin has a low content of the helical structure and a significant amount of the pleated sheet (beta) conformation. The native conformation was found to be sensitive to alkali, sodium dodecyl sulfate, and guanidine-HC1, but it was stable in acid (e.g. pH 2.4) as shown by CD and persistence or the disappearance of sweet taste. The main chain conformation of the alkali-denatured monellin (pH 10.9) was restored upon acidification (pH 3.3) of the alkaline solutions. The tertiary structure, however, was not completely restroed, as indicated by CD in the 230-300 nm spectral zone, although the sweet taste reappeared. If the pH of a neutral solution was raised to 9.6, the CD in the near ultraviolet was significantly altered, though the sweet taste persisted. This indicates that a slight conformational change did not interfere with the effects on the taste buds. While sodium dodecyl sulfate readily disorganized the tertiary structure, the main chain was reconstructed by this reagent into a new form of higher helix content than in the native macromolecule. Reconstruction into a modified conformation of higher helix content was achieved also with 50% ethanol. The main chain conformation was not affected by 25% ethanol which produced slight changes in the CD at 230-260 nm zone and did not abolish the sweet taste.     

Highly probable active site of the sweet protein monellin.

The sweet protein monellin consists of two noncovalently associated polypeptide chains, the A chain of 44 amino acid residues and the B chain of 50 residues. Synthetic monellin is 4000 times as sweet as sucrose on a weight basis, and the native conformation is essential for the sweet taste. Knowledge of the active site of monellin will provide important information on the mode of interaction between sweeteners and their receptors. If the replacement of a certain amino acid residue in monellin removes the sweet taste, while the native conformation is retained, it may be concluded that the position replaced is the active site. Our previous replacement studies on Asp residues in the A chain did not remove the sweet taste. The B chain contains two Asp residues at positions 7 and 21, which were replaced by Asn. [AsnB21]Monellin and [AsnB7]monellin were 7000 and 20 times sweeter than sucrose, respectively. The low potency of the [AsnB7]monellin indicates that AspB7 participates in binding with the receptor. AspB7 was then replaced by Abu. [AbuB7]Monellin was devoid of sweetness, and retained the native conformation. AspB7 is located at the surface of the molecule (Ogata et al.). These results suggest that Asp7 in the B chain is the highly probable active site of monellin.     

Solution structure, backbone dynamics, and stability of a double mutant single-chain monellin. structural origin of sweetness

Single-chain monellin (SCM), which is an engineered 94-residue polypeptide, has been characterized as being as sweet as native two-chain monellin. Data from gel-filtration high performance liquid chromatography and NMR has proven that SCM exists as a monomer in aqueous solution. In order to determine the structural origin of the taste of sweetness, we engineered several mutant SCM proteins by mutating Glu(2), Asp(7), and Arg(39) residues, which are responsible for sweetness. In this study, we present the solution structure, backbone dynamics, and stability of mutant SCM proteins using circular dichroism, fluorescence, and NMR spectroscopy. Based on the NMR data, a stable alpha-helix and five-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet were identified for double mutant SCM. Strands beta1 and beta2 are connected by a small bulge, and the disruption of the first beta-strand were observed with SCM(DR) comprising residues of Ile(38)-Cys(41). The dynamical and folding characteristics from circular dichroism, fluorescence, and backbone dynamics studies revealed that both wild type and mutant proteins showed distinct dynamical as well as stability differences, suggesting the important role of mutated residues in the sweet taste of SCM. Our results will provide an insight into the structural origin of sweet taste as well as the mutational effect in the stability of the engineered sweet protein SCM.     

Stable expression of the sweet protein monellin variant MNEI in tobacco chloroplasts

Monellin is a naturally sweet protein that consists of two polypeptide chains and has potential uses as a highly potent non-carbohydrate sweetener. We aimed to make this protein more usable by increasing its stability and expressing it in a high-yielding system. MNEI is a modified version of the protein that consists of the two natural chains of monellin joined via a dipeptide linkage. In the thermostability analysis of MNEI variants, four mutated MNEIs, MNEI-E24L, MNEI-E24F, MNEI-E24W, and MNEI-E24A, had higher melting temperatures than wild-type MNEI and retained their sweet flavor even at temperatures above 70?°C. Our findings indicate that the increased stability of monellin allows it to retain its strong sweetness even under extreme conditions. We successfully overexpressed the thermostable MNEI mutants in tobacco chloroplasts. Here, we report that the MNEI mutants showed enhanced thermostability, and the stable forms of MNEI can be produced through plastid transformation in tobacco.     

Design and development of a high temperature stable sweet protein base on monellin

Monellin, one kind of most sweet proteins, could be used instead of carbohydrates in the diabetic diet and pharmaceuticals. However, the critical problem interferes with monellin usage in the food or pharmaceutical industry was its unstable at high temperatures. Here, we describe a novel method to increase the thermostability of monellin. Inspired by the high T_m value in RNA hairpin containing structure, the beta-hairpin was added between the two polypeptide chains of monellin instead of Gly-Phe dipeptide linker. Three kinds of beta-hairpin libraries were constructed and selected. Remarkably, the T_m has been increased from 54.7℃ of monellin with Gly-Phe dipeptide linker to 79.5℃, 89.1℃ and 89.4℃ of selected three mutants. And combined with E24Q/Y80R mutation, the mutated E24Q/Y80R hairpin monellin Tm was as high as 96.1℃. It was soluble even heated in boiling water for 10 min, and sweetness recovered after cooling. This new hairpin monellin may show remarkable potential for further sweeteners.     

Conformational changes of the sweet protein monellin as measured by fluorescence emission

Monellin is a protein that tastes sweet. In the native state it is a dimer composed of two dissimilar noncovalently associated polypeptides. The conformation of the protein is a determinant of its sweetness, and the present investigation takes advantage of the fluorescence spectrum being a sensitive index of its conformation. The emission spectrum is used to evaluate the ability of temperature and pH to alter the conformation and the sweetness of the protein. When monellin dissolved in water is heated in discrete steps from 25 to 100 degrees C, its sweetness decreases. The halfwidth of the fluorescence emission band increases in parallel with the loss of sweetness. The increase in halfwidth is due primarily to an increase in the intensity of tyrosine emission that may be the result of the two dissimilar polypeptides of monellin beginning to separate. Tyrosine residues are present in both chains, while the single tryptophan occurs in only one. Monellin is less susceptible to denaturation by increasing temperature when dissolved in sodium acetate buffer at pH 4 than it is at pH 3 or 7. When the pH of a solution containing monellin in 0.1 M KC1 is varied from 2 to 13, there is a broad pH range (pH 4 to 9) where monellin's conformation is not markedly altered. Below pH 3.5 and above pH 10.5, however, the emission spectra indicate that substantial denaturation occurs. However, monellin can be partially renatured following pH 12 treatment with only minimal loss of sweetness. The sweetness of monellin under these two types of denaturing conditions, temperature and pH, can be predicted by the fluorescence emission spectrum of the protein. In addition, this study confirms that the biological activity of monellin, its sweetness, is a function of quaternary structure of the protein.     

Folding and stability of a primitive protein

We have previously attempted to simulate domain creation in early protein evolution by recombining polypeptide segments from non-homologous proteins, and we have described the structure of one such de novo protein, 1b11, a segment-swapped tetramer with novel architecture. Here, we have analyzed the thermodynamic stability and folding kinetics of the 1b11 tetramer and its monomeric and dimeric intermediates, and of 1b11 mutants with changes at the domain interface. Denatured 1b11 polypeptides fold into transient, folded monomers with marginal stability (DeltaG<1kcalmol(-1)) which convert rapidly ( approximately 6x10(4)M(-1)s(-1)) into dimers (DeltaG=9.8kcal/mol) and then more slowly ( approximately 3M(-1)s(-1)) into tetramers (DeltaG=28kcalmol(-1)). Segment swapping takes place during dimerization, as suggested by mass spectroscopic analysis of covalently linked peptides derived from proteolysis of a disulfide-linked dimer. Our results confirm that segment swapping and associated oligomerization are both powerful ways of stabilizing proteins, and we suggest that this may have been a feature of early protein evolution.     

Solution structure of a sweet protein: NMR study of MNEI, a single chain monellin

The sweet protein MNEI is a construct of 96 amino acid residues engineered by linking, with a Gly-Phe dipeptide, chains B and A of monellin, a sweet protein isolated from Discoreophyllum cuminsii. Here, the solution structure of MNEI was determined on the basis of 1169 nuclear Overhauser enhancement derived distance restraints and 184 dihedral angle restraints obtained from direct measurement of three-bond spin coupling constants. The identification of hydrogen bonded NH groups was obtained by a combination of H/(2)H exchange data and NH resonance temperature coefficients derived from a series of HSQC spectra in the temperature range 278-328 K. The good resolution of the structure is reflected by the Z-score of the quality checking program in WHAT IF (-0.61). The topology of MNEI, like that of natural monellin and of SCM, another single-chain monellin, is typical of the cystatin superfamily: an alpha-helix cradled into the concave side of a five-strand anti-parallel beta-sheet. The high resolution (14 restraints/residue) 3D structure of MNEI shows close similarity to the crystal structures of natural monellin and of SCM but differs from the solution structure of SCM. The structures of SCM in the crystal and in solution differ in some of the secondary structure elements, but most of all in the relative arrangement of the elements: the four main beta-strands that surround the helix in the crystal structure of SCM, are displaced far from the helix in the solution structure of SCM. These differences were attributed to the fact that SCM is a monomer in solution and a dimer in the crystal. This result is at variance with the observation that our solution structure, like that of SCM, corresponds to a monomeric state of the protein, as demonstrated by the insensitivity of HSQC spectra to extreme dilution (down to 20 microM). On the basis of the solution structure of MNEI it is possible to propose that the main glucophores are hosted on loop L34, whereas the N-terminal and C-terminal regions host two other important interaction regions, centered around segments 6-9 and 94-96.     

Effects of denaturants on the sweet-tasting protein monellin.

Effects of the denaturants urea and guanidine-HCl on the sweet-tasting protein monellin have been studied. The pH at which monellin is initially treated with denaturant is an important factor in retention of sweetness, but the pH maintained during subsequent removal of denaturant by dialysis has no effect on activity. Recovery of sweetness of denaturant-treated monellin is favored when denaturation occurs at acid pH. Monellin treated with either 6 M guanidine-HCl or 8 M urea at acid pH retains all of its sweetness following removal of denaturant, but urea treatment at neutral pH leads to some irreversible loss of sweetness. Monellin precipitates from solution under some conditions during removal of denaturant by dialysis, and the precipitated protein is no longer sweet. Precipitation is least under acid conditions. Aggregated protein was demonstrated by gel filtration chromatography. The single sulfhydryl group of monellin was not demonstrable in the precipitated protein, having apparently become oxidized during denaturation and formation of the aggregated protein. The data support the hypothesis that the tertiary structure is important in the ability of monellin to elicit a sweet sensation.     

The structure of monellin and its relation to the sweetness of the protein.

The sweet protein monellin [1-3] has been shown to consist of two non-identical subunits of 50 and 42 amino acid residues, which were separated electrophoretically and chromatographically. Automatic sequential Edman degradation gave the complete sequence of the longer subunit, and a partial sequency of the shorter one. It was found that the sweetness of monellin requires the undissociated molecule. The individual subunits were not sweet, neither did they block the sweet sensation of sucrose or monellin. Blocking of the single SH of monellin abolished its sweetness as did reaction of the single methionyl residue with CNBr. Since the cysteinyl and methionyl residues appear to be adjacent, it is suggested that this part of the molecule is essential for its sweetness.     

An insight into domain structures and thermal stability of gamma-crystallins.

The thermal behavior of gamma II, gamma IIIA, gamma IIIB, and gamma IVA crystallin, from calorimetric and spectral studies, has been analyzed in terms of selective unfolding of domains, interdomain interactions, conformational stability, and the existence of intermediates in the order-disorder transition equilibrium. The major endothermic transition (Tm) observed calorimetrically for all four fractions occurs between 67 and 78 degrees C, with enthalpy change (delta H) from 80 to 150 kcal/mol, values that agree reasonably well with those from spectroscopic measurements. gamma II and gamma IIIB show a second thermal event at T less than Tm whereas gamma IIIA and gamma IVA showed no additional transition. Urea-induced equilibrium unfolding of gamma II at acidic pH, unlike gamma IVA, is biphasic as monitored by CD and fluorescence, indicating the existence of an intermediate. The absence of a cooperative transition in gamma IVA in acidic urea and the appearance of a single endotherm in differential scanning calorimetry at low pH have been attributed to a structured intermediate that melts at low temperature. The difference in the folding/unfolding of gamma II and gamma IVA has been explained by subtle differences in the packing arrangement of their two domains and interactions between them. Thermal aggregation of gamma-crystallins could be prevented either by preincubation with ionic detergents or at low pH or in the presence of chemical denaturant, indicating that the protein surface charge and solvent polarity influence their stability. An increase in the 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonate-bound fluorescence during heat denaturation also suggests that the thermal aggregation is governed by hydrophobic interactions.     

Improved yield and stability of L49-sFv-beta-lactamase, a single-chain antibody fusion protein for anticancer prodrug activation, by protein engineering

The L49 single-chain Fv fused to beta-lactamase (L49-sFv-bL) combined with the prodrug C-Mel is an effective anticancer agent against tumor cells expressing the p97 antigen. However, large-scale production of L49-sFv-bL from refolded E. coli inclusion bodies has been problematic due to inefficient refolding and instability of the fusion protein. Sequence analysis of the L49-sFv framework regions revealed three residues in the framework regions at positions L2, H82B, and H91, which are not conserved for their position, occurring in <1% of sequences in Fv sequence databases. One further unusual residue, found in <3% of variable sequences, was observed at position H39. Each unusual residue was mutated to a conserved residue for its position and tested for refolding yield from inclusion bodies following expression in E. coli. The three V(H) single mutants showed improvement in the yield of active protein and were combined to form double and triple mutants resulting in a 7-8-fold increased yield compared to the parental protein. In an attempt to further improve yield, the orientation of the triple mutant was reversed to create a bL-L49-sFv fusion protein resulting in a 3-fold increase in expressed inclusion body protein and producing a 20-fold increase in the yield of purified protein compared to the parental protein. The triple mutants in both orientations displayed increased stability in murine plasma and binding affinity was not affected by the introduced mutations. Both triple mutants also displayed potent in vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo antitumor activity against p97 expressing melanoma cells and tumor xenografts, respectively. These results show that a rational protein-engineering approach improved the yield, stability, and refolding characteristics of L49-sFv-bL while maintaining binding affinity and therapeutic efficacy.     

Redesigning a sweet protein: increased stability and renaturability

Monellin is one of two natural proteins from African berries with potent sweet taste. Monellin is the smaller of the two, and consists of two peptides. The protein loses sweetness when heated above 50 degrees C under acidic pH. Based on the crystal structure of monellin we have fused the two chains into a single chain using several different linkers copied and 'transplanted' from the same molecule. One of the newly designed proteins is as potently sweet as the natural one, is more stable upon temperature or pH changes, and renatures easily even after heating to 100 degrees C at low pH.     

Interaction of sweet proteins with their receptor. A conformational study of peptides corresponding to loops of brazzein, monellin and thaumatin.

The mechanism of interaction of sweet proteins with the T1R2-T1R3 sweet taste receptor has not yet been elucidated. Low molecular mass sweeteners and sweet proteins interact with the same receptor, the human T1R2-T1R3 receptor. The presence on the surface of the proteins of "sweet fingers", i.e. protruding features with chemical groups similar to those of low molecular mass sweeteners that can probe the active site of the receptor, would be consistent with a single mechanism for the two classes of compounds. We have synthesized three cyclic peptides corresponding to the best potential "sweet fingers" of brazzein, monellin and thaumatin, the sweet proteins whose structures are well characterized. NMR data show that all three peptides have a clear tendency, in aqueous solution, to assume hairpin conformations consistent with the conformation of the same sequences in the parent proteins. The peptide corresponding to the only possible loop of brazzein, c[CFYDEKRNLQC(37-47)], exists in solution in a well ordered hairpin conformation very similar to that of the same sequence in the parent protein. However, none of the peptides has a sweet taste. This finding strongly suggests that sweet proteins recognize a binding site different from the one that binds small molecular mass sweeteners. The data of the present work support an alternative mechanism of interaction, the "wedge model", recently proposed for sweet proteins [Temussi, P. A. (2002) FEBS Lett.526, 1-3.].     

Equilibrium unfolding studies of monellin: the double-chain variant appears to be more stable than the single-chain variant

To improve our understanding of the contributions of different stabilizing interactions to protein stability, including that of residual structure in the unfolded state, the small sweet protein monellin has been studied in both its two variant forms, the naturally occurring double-chain variant (dcMN) and the artificially created single-chain variant (scMN). Equilibrium guanidine hydrochloride-induced unfolding studies at pH 7 show that the standard free energy of unfolding, ΔG°(U), of dcMN to unfolded chains A and B and its dependence on guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl) concentration are both independent of protein concentration, while the midpoint of unfolding has an exponential dependence on protein concentration. Hence, the unfolding of dcMN like that of scMN can be described as two-state unfolding. The free energy of dissociation, ΔG°(d), of the two free chains, A and B, from dcMN, as measured by equilibrium binding studies, is significantly lower than ΔG°(U), apparently because of the presence of residual structure in free chain B. The value of ΔG°(U), at the standard concentration of 1 M, is found to be ～5.5 kcal mol(-1) higher for dcMN than for scMN in the range from pH 4 to 9, over which unfolding appears to be two-state. Hence, dcMN appears to be more stable than scMN. It seems that unfolded scMN is stabilized by residual structure that is absent in unfolded dcMN and/or that native scMN is destabilized by strain that is relieved in native dcMN. The value of ΔG°(U) for both protein variants decreases with an increase in pH from 4 to 9, apparently because of the thermodynamic coupling of unfolding to the protonation of a buried carboxylate side chain whose pK(a) shifts from 4.5 in the unfolded state to 9 in the native state. Finally, it is shown that although the thermodynamic stabilities of dcMN and scMN are very different, their kinetic stabilities with respect to unfolding in GdnHCl are very similar.     

Solid-phase synthesis of [AsnA16]-, [AsnA22]-, [GlnA25]-, and [AsnA26]monellin, analogues of the sweet protein monellin.

In an attempt to delineate the binding site(s) of monellin to the receptor by means of a structure-taste relationship, we synthesized four monellin analogues, [AsnA16]-, [AsnA22]-, [GlnA25]-, and [AsnA26]-monellin, which were 7500, 750, 2500, and 5500 times as sweet as sucrose on a weight basis, respectively. Among them, [AsnA22]monellin and [GlnA25]monellin were less sweet than monellin, and were susceptible to the HPLC conditions used. It can be concluded that Asp16, Asp22, Glu25, and Asp26 residues of the A chain did not participate in binding with the receptor, since the sweet taste was not removed by replacing the amino acid residues with Asn or Gln. It can also be concluded that Asp22 and Glu25 of the A chain may have participated in intramolecular binding, as was pointed out by Kim et al., since exchanging Asp22 and Glu25 of the A chain with Asn and Gln significantly decreased the stability in solution.     

Free energies of protein decoys provide insight into determinants of protein stability

We have calculated the stability of decoy structures of several proteins (from the CASP3 models and the Park and Levitt decoy set) relative to the native structures. The calculations were performed with the force field-consistent ES/IS method, in which an implicit solvent (IS) model is used to calculate the average solvation free energy for snapshots from explicit simulations (ESs). The conformational free energy is obtained by adding the internal energy of the solute from the ESs and an entropic term estimated from the covariance positional fluctuation matrix. The set of atomic Born radii and the cavity-surface free energy coefficient used in the implicit model has been optimized to be consistent with the all-atom force field used in the ESs (cedar/gromos with simple point charge (SPC) water model). The decoys are found to have a consistently higher free energy than that of the native structure; the gap between the native structure and the best decoy varies between 10 and 15 kcal/mole, on the order of the free energy difference that typically separates the native state of a protein from the unfolded state. The correlation between the free energy and the extent to which the decoy structures differ from the native (as root mean square deviation) is very weak; hence, the free energy is not an accurate measure for ranking the structurally most native-like structures from among a set of models. Analysis of the energy components shows that stability is attained as a result of three major driving forces: (1) minimum size of the protein-water surface interface; (2) minimum total electrostatic energy, which includes solvent polarization; and (3) minimum protein packing energy. The detailed fit required to optimize the last term may underlie difficulties encountered in recovering the native fold from an approximate decoy or model structure.