Effect of BAP and IAA on the expression of G1 and G2 control points and G1-S and G2-M transitions in root meristem cells of Vicia faba

Excised, carbohydrate-starved root meristems of Vicia faba subsp. minor have been used to investigate the impact of the auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and the cytokinin benzyl-6-aminopurine (BAP) on (1) the expression of Principal Control Points (PCPs) during the G1- and G2-phases of the cell cycle, and (2) the dynamics of sucrose-mediated resumption of DNA replication and mitosis (G1-to-S and G2-to-M transitions). Compared with the excised root tips starved in mineral medium without hormones, stationary phase meristems induced during continuous treatment with BAP, IAA, or a mixture of BAP+IAA, increased the number of G2 cells, producing characteristic profiles of nuclear DNA content. In medium containing 2% sucrose, BAP accelerated PCP1-->S and PCP2-->M, whereas continuous treatment with IAA resulted in marked prolongation of both transitions. Since the PCPs regulate progression through the key events of interphase and mitosis by interacting with cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs), these results seem to correspond with current data indicating functional connections between phytohormones, nutritional signals, gene expression and the cell division cycles in plants.     

Nuclear protein kinase activities during the cell cycle of HeLa S3 cells

To ascertain the activity and substrate specificity of nuclear protein kinases during various stages of the cell cycle of HeLa S3 cells, a nuclear phospho-protein-enriched sample was extracted from synchronised cells and assayed in vitro in the presence of homologous substrates. The nuclear protein kinases increased in activity during S and G2 phase to a level that was twice that of kinases from early S phase cells. The activity was reduced during mitosis but increased again in G1 phase. When the phosphoproteins were separated into five fractions by cellulose-phosphate chromatography each fraction, though not homogenous, exhibited differences in activity. Variations in the activity of the protein kinase fractions were observed during the cell cycle, similar to those observed for the unfractionated kinases. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis of the proteins phosphorylated by each of the five kinase fractions demonstrated a substrate specificity. The fractions also exhibited some cell cycle stage-specific preference for substrates; kinases from G1 cells phosphorylated mainly high molecular weight polypeptides, whereas lower molecular weight species were phosphorylated by kinases from the S, G2 and mitotic stages of the cell cycle. Inhibition of DNA and histone synthesis by cytosine arabinoside had no effect on the activity or substrate specificity of S phase kinases. Some kinase fractions phosphorylated histones as well as non-histone chromosomal proteins and this phosphorylation was also cell cycle stage dependent. The presence of histones in the in vitro assay influenced the ability of some fractions to phosphorylate particular non-histone polypeptides; non-histone proteins also appeared to affect the in vitro phosphorylation of histones.     

Cooperative regulation of the cell division cycle by the protein kinases RAF and AKT

The RAS-activated RAF-->MEK-->extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase (PI3'-kinase)-->PDK1-->AKT signaling pathways are believed to cooperate to promote the proliferation of normal cells and the aberrant proliferation of cancer cells. To explore the mechanisms that underlie such cooperation, we have derived cells harboring conditionally active, steroid hormone-regulated forms of RAF and AKT. These cells permit the assessment of the biological and biochemical effects of activation of these protein kinases either alone or in combination with one another. Under conditions where activation of neither RAF nor AKT alone promoted S-phase progression, coactivation of both kinases elicited a robust proliferative response. Moreover, under conditions where high-level activation of RAF induced G(1) cell cycle arrest, activation of AKT bypassed the arrest and promoted S-phase progression. At the level of the cell cycle machinery, RAF and AKT cooperated to induce cyclin D1 and repress p27(Kip1) expression. Repression of p27(Kip1) was accompanied by a dramatic reduction in KIP1 mRNA and was observed in primary mouse embryo fibroblasts derived from mice either lacking SKP2 or expressing a T187A mutated form of p27(Kip1). Consistent with these observations, pharmacological inhibition of MEK or PI3'-kinase inhibited the effects of activated RAS on the expression of p27(Kip1) in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts and in a panel of bona fide human pancreatic cancer cell lines. Furthermore, we demonstrated that AKT activation led to sustained activation of cyclin/cdk2 complexes that occurred concomitantly with the removal of RAF-induced p21(Cip1) from cyclin E/cdk2 complexes. Cumulatively, these data strongly suggest that the RAF-->MEK-->ERK and PI3'K-->PDK-->AKT signaling pathways can cooperate to promote G(0)-->G(1)-->S-phase cell cycle progression in both normal and cancer cells.     

Human NDR kinases control G(1)/S cell cycle transition by directly regulating p21 stability

The G(1) phase of the cell cycle is an important integrator of internal and external cues, allowing a cell to decide whether to proliferate, differentiate, or die. Multiple protein kinases, among them the cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), control G(1)-phase progression and S-phase entry. With the regulation of apoptosis, centrosome duplication, and mitotic chromosome alignment downstream of the HIPPO pathway components MST1 and MST2, mammalian NDR kinases have been implicated to function in cell cycle-dependent processes. Although they are well characterized in terms of biochemical regulation and upstream signaling pathways, signaling mechanisms downstream of mammalian NDR kinases remain largely unknown. We identify here a role for human NDR in regulating the G(1)/S transition. In G(1) phase, NDR kinases are activated by a third MST kinase (MST3). Significantly, interfering with NDR and MST3 kinase expression results in G(1) arrest and subsequent proliferation defects. Furthermore, we describe the first downstream signaling mechanisms by which NDR kinases regulate cell cycle progression. Our findings suggest that NDR kinases control protein stability of the cyclin-Cdk inhibitor protein p21 by direct phosphorylation. These findings establish a novel MST3-NDR-p21 axis as an important regulator of G(1)/S progression of mammalian cells.     

Protein kinases and cell cycle control

Protein kinases play a central role in the regulation of the eukaryotic cell cycle. Recent research has concentrated on a particular family of protein kinases, the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), and their involvement in regulating particular cell cycle transitions, such as the initiation of DNA synthesis (S phase) or of cell division (mitosis). One can think of these enzymes as the basic machinery of the cell; their activity is then modulated by proteins which transduce signals from the external environment, and by proteins that monitor the progress of events such as DNA replication or the formation of the mitotic spindle. This review will be structured so as to introduce the cyclin-CDK motif, outline which cyclin-CDKs are involved at different cell cycle stages, their direct regulation by other protein kinases and phosphatases, and lastly the importance of other protein kinases in the cell cycle.     

Effect of positive feedback loops on the robustness of oscillations in the network of cyclin-dependent kinases driving the mammalian cell cycle

The transitions between the G(1) , S, G(2) and M phases of the mammalian cell cycle are driven by a network of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), whose sequential activation is regulated by intertwined negative and positive feedback loops. We previously proposed a detailed computational model for the Cdk network, and showed that this network is capable of temporal self-organization in the form of sustained oscillations, which govern ordered progression through the successive phases of the cell cycle [Gérard and Goldbeter (2009) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA106, 21643-21648]. We subsequently proposed a skeleton model for the cell cycle that retains the core regulatory mechanisms of the detailed model [Gérard and Goldbeter (2011) Interface Focus1, 24-35]. Here we extend this skeleton model by incorporating Cdk regulation through phosphorylation/dephosphorylation and by including the positive feedback loops that underlie the dynamics of the G(1) /S and G(2) /M transitions via phosphatase Cdc25 and via phosphatase Cdc25 and kinase Wee1, respectively. We determine the effects of these positive feedback loops and ultrasensitivity in phosphorylation/dephosphorylation on the dynamics of the Cdk network. The multiplicity of positive feedback loops as well as the existence of ultrasensitivity promote the occurrence of bistability and increase the amplitude of the oscillations in the various cyclin/Cdk complexes. By resorting to stochastic simulations, we further show that the presence of multiple, redundant positive feedback loops in the G(2) /M transition of the cell cycle markedly enhances the robustness of the Cdk oscillations with respect to molecular noise.     

Integrating the MAP kinase signal into the G1 phase cell cycle machinery

Growth factors and the extracellular matrix provide the environmental cues that control the proliferation of most cell types. The binding of growth factors and matrix proteins to receptor tyrosine kinases and integrins, respectively, regulates several cytoplasmic signal transduction cascades, among which activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade, ras --> Raf --> MEK --> ERK, is perhaps the best characterized. Curiously, ERK activation has been associated with both stimulation and inhibition of cell proliferation. In this review, we summarize recent studies that connect ERK signaling to G1 phase cell cycle control and suggest that the cellular response to an ERK signal depends on both ERK signal intensity and duration. We also discuss studies showing that receptor tyrosine kinases and integrins differentially regulate the ERK signal in G1 phase.     

Cell cycle re-entry mechanisms after DNA damage checkpoints: Giving it some gas to shut off the breaks!

In order to maintain genetic integrity, cells are equipped with cell cycle checkpoints that detect DNA damage, orchestrate repair, and if necessary, eliminate severely damaged cells by inducing apoptotic cell death. The mitotic machinery is now emerging as an important determinant of the cellular responses to DNA damage where it functions as both the downstream target and the upstream regulator of the G2/M checkpoint. Cell cycle kinases and the DNA damage checkpoint kinases appear to reciprocally control each other. Specifically, cell cycle kinases control the inactivation of DNA damage checkpoint signaling. Termination of a DNA damage response by mitotic kinases appears to be an evolutionary conserved mechanism that allows resumption of cell cycle progression. Here we review recent reports in which molecular mechanisms underlying checkpoint silencing at the G2/M transition are elucidated.     

The septins function in G1 pathways that influence the pattern of cell growth in budding yeast

The septins are a conserved family of proteins that have been proposed to carry out diverse functions. In budding yeast, the septins become localized to the site of bud emergence in G1 but have not been thought to carry out important functions at this stage of the cell cycle. We show here that the septins function in redundant mechanisms that are required for formation of the bud neck and for the normal pattern of cell growth early in the cell cycle. The Shs1 septin shows strong genetic interactions with G1 cyclins and is directly phosphorylated by G1 cyclin-dependent kinases, consistent with a role in early cell cycle events. However, Shs1 phosphorylation site mutants do not show genetic interactions with the G1 cyclins or obvious defects early in the cell cycle. Rather, they cause an increased cell size and aberrant cell morphology that are dependent upon inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdk1 at the G2/M transition. Shs1 phosphorylation mutants also show defects in interaction with the Gin4 kinase, which associates with the septins during G2/M and plays a role in regulating inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdk1. Phosphorylation of Shs1 by G1 cyclin-dependent kinases plays a role in events that influence Cdk1 inhibitory phosphorylation.     

The DASH complex component Ask1 is a cell cycle-regulated Cdk substrate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The proper timing and fidelity of cell cycle transitions is critical for the survival of organisms. Cyclin-dependent kinases orchestrate many cell cycle transitions in eukaryotes including S phase entry and mitosis. Accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis is one of the key events regulated by the cell cycle and many proteins function together to ensure the fidelity of this process. In S. cerevisiae, the DASH complex is essential for chromosome segregation. The DASH complex binds to microtubules and kinetochores and regulates their association. Here we report that Askl, one component of DASH, is phosphorylated during the cell cycle. This phosphorylation is dependent on Cdks in vivo, and in vitro Cdc28 can phosphorylate Askl. We identify two Cdk phosphorylation sites in Askl and find that the phosphorylation of Askl is important for its full activity in vivo. Thus, the DASH complex is directly regulated by cyclin-dependent kinases to facilitate chromosome segregation.     

Regulation of the eukaryotic cell cycle: molecular antagonism, hysteresis, and irreversible transitions

In recent years, molecular biologists have uncovered a wealth of information about the proteins controlling cell growth and division in eukaryotes. The regulatory system is so complex that it defies understanding by verbal arguments alone. Quantitative tools are necessary to probe reliably into the details of cell cycle control. To this end, we convert hypothetical molecular mechanisms into sets of nonlinear ordinary differential equations and use standard analytical and numerical methods to study their solutions. First, we present a simple model of the antagonistic interactions between cyclin-dependent kinases and the anaphase promoting complex, which shows how progress through the cell cycle can be thought of as irreversible transitions (Start and Finish) between two stable states (G1 and S-G2-M) of the regulatory system. Then we add new pieces to the "puzzle" until we obtain reasonable models of the control systems in yeast cells, frog eggs, and cultured mammalian cells.     

Resolution of Kinase Activities during the HeLa Cell Cycle: Identification of Kinases with Cyclic Activities

Anin situgel kinase assay was used to resolve kinase activities during the HeLa cell cycle. Three kinase activities changed dramatically during the cell cycle, whereas a number of others remained relatively constant. The former included histone kinases with estimated molecular masses of 46, 87, and 39 kDa. The 46-kDa kinase activity was preferentially expressed at least 10-fold greater in mitotic cells. In contrast, the 87- and 39-kDa kinases were most active early in G1 but their activity declined progressively as cells approached mitosis. The 87- but not the 46- or 39-kDa kinases had autophosphorylation activity. The identities of the kinases are unknown but they may play important roles in regulation of the cell cycle.     

Mathematical modeling of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe cell cycle: exploring the role of multiple phosphatases

Cell cycle is the central process that regulates growth and division in all eukaryotes. Based on the environmental condition sensed, the cell lies in a resting phase G0 or proceeds through the cyclic cell division process (G1??S??G2??M). These series of events and phase transitions are governed mainly by the highly conserved Cyclin dependent kinases (Cdks) and its positive and negative regulators. The cell cycle regulation of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is modeled in this study. The study exploits a detailed molecular interaction map compiled based on the published model and experimental data. There are accumulating evidences about the prominent regulatory role of specific phosphatases in cell cycle regulations. The current study emphasizes the possible role of multiple phosphatases that governs the cell cycle regulation in fission yeast S. pombe. The ability of the model to reproduce the reported regulatory profile for the wild-type and various mutants was verified though simulations.     

Cell cycle-specific activity of type I and type II cyclic adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate-dependent protein kinases in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Types I and II cyclic adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent protein kinases have been studied during the cell cycle of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Chinese hamster ovary cells were synchronized by selective detachment of mitotic cells from monolayer cultures. Protein kinases were separated by DEAE-cellulose chromatography and were similar to the types of cAMP-dependent protein kinases studied in skeletal muscle and in heart extracts. The total amount of protein kinases activity per cell was substantial, both in mitosis and at the G1/S boundary. During mitosis, the relatively high activity of protein kinase was due to a predominance of type I protein kinase. During early G1, the activity of type I protein kinase decreased and there was little detectable type II activity. A rapid increase in the activity of type II was evident at the G1/S boundary. The administration of puromycin (50 mug/ml) from 1 to 5 hours after selective detachment of mitotic cells abolished the activity of type II cAMP-dependent protein kinase seen at the G1/S border, but had no observable effect on the activity of type I protein kinase. The data presented demonstrate cell cycle-specific activity patterns of type I and type II protein kinase Type I protein kinase activity is high in mitosis and is constant throughout the cell cycle. Increased type II protein kinase activity seems to be related to the initiation of DNA synthesis in S phase. The data suggest a translational control of type II cAMP-dependent protein kinase activity.     

The DASH Complex Component Ask1 Is a Cell Cycle-Regulated Cdk Substrate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The proper timing and fidelity of cell cycle transitions is critical for the survival of organisms. Cyclin-dependent kinases orchestrate many cell cycle transitions in eukaryotes including S phase entry and mitosis. Accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis is one of the key events regulated by the cell cycle and many proteins function together to ensure the fidelity of this process. In S. cerevisiae, the DASH complex is essential for chromosome segregation. The DASH complex binds to microtubules and kinetochores and regulates their association. Here we report that Ask1, one component of DASH, is phosphorylated during the cell cycle. This phosphorylation is dependent on Cdks in vivo, and in vitro Cdc28 can phosphorylate Ask1. We identify two Cdk phosphorylation sites in Ask1 and find that the phosphorylation of Ask1 is important for its full activity in vivo. Thus, the DASH complex is directly regulated by cyclin-dependent kinases to facilitate chromosome segregation.