Hid,Rpr and Grim negatively regulate DIAP1 levels through distinct mechanisms

Inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins suppress apoptosis and inhibit caspases. Several IAPs also function as ubiquitin-protein ligases. Regulators of IAP auto-ubiquitination, and thus IAP levels, have yet to be identified. Here we show that Head involution defective (Hid), Reaper (Rpr) and Grim downregulate Drosophila melanogaster IAP1 (DIAP) protein levels. Hid stimulates DIAP1 polyubiquitination and degradation. In contrast to Hid, Rpr and Grim can downregulate DIAP1 through mechanisms that do not require DIAP1 function as a ubiquitin-protein ligase. Observations with Grim suggest that one mechanism by which these proteins produce a relative decrease in DIAP1 levels is to promote a general suppression of protein translation. These observations define two mechanisms through which DIAP1 ubiquitination controls cell death: first, increased ubiquitination promotes degradation directly; second, a decrease in global protein synthesis results in a differential loss of short-lived proteins such as DIAP1. Because loss of DIAP1 is sufficient to promote caspase activation, these mechanisms should promote apoptosis.     

Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptor chimeras identify domains responsible for the specificity of ligand binding and activation.

In order to identify the receptor domains responsible for the VPAC1 selectivity of the VIP1 agonist, [Lys15, Arg16, Leu27] VIP (1-7)/GRF (8-27) and VIP1 antagonist, Ac His1 [D-Phe2, Lys15, Arg16, Leu27] VIP (3-7)/GRF (8-27), we evaluated their binding and functional properties on chimeric VPAC1/VPAC2 receptors. Our results suggest that the N-terminal extracellular domain is responsible for the selectivity of the VIP1 antagonist. Selective recognition of the VIP1 agonist was supported by a larger receptor area: in addition to the N-terminal domain, the first extracellular loop, as well as additional determinants in the distal part of the VPAC1 receptor were involved. Furthermore, these additional domains were critical for an efficient receptor activation, as replacement of EC1 in VPAC1 by its counter part in the VPAC2 receptor markedly reduced the maximal response.     

Asn229 in the third helix of VPAC1 receptor is essential for receptor activation but not for receptor phosphorylation and internalization: comparison with Asn216 in VPAC2 receptor

After stimulation with agonist, G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) undergo conformational changes that allow activation of G proteins to transduce the signal, followed by phosphorylation by kinases and arrestin binding to promote receptor internalization. Actual paradigm, based on a study of GPCR-A/rhodopsin family, suggests that a network of interactions between conserved residues located in transmembrane (TM) domains (mainly TM3, TM6 and TM7) is involved in the molecular switch leading to GPCR activation.

We evaluated in CHO cells expressing the VPAC₁ receptor the role of the third transmembrane helix in agonist signalling by point mutation into Ala of the residues highly conserved in the secretin-family of receptors: Y²²⁴, N²²⁹, F²³⁰, W²³², E²³⁶, G²³⁷, Y²³⁹, L²⁴⁰. N²²⁹A VPAC₁ mutant was characterized by a decrease in both potency and efficacy of VIP stimulated adenylate cyclase activity, by the absence of agonist stimulated [Ca²⁺]_i increase, by a preserved receptor recognition of agonists and antagonist and by a preserved sensitivity to GTP suggesting the importance of that residue for efficient G protein activation. N²²⁹D mutant was not expressed at the membrane, and the N²²⁹Q with a conserved mutation was less affected than the A mutant. Agonist stimulated phosphorylation and internalization of N²²⁹A and N²²⁹Q VPAC₁ were unaffected. However, the re-expression of internalized mutant receptors, but not that of the wild type receptor, was rapidly reversed after VIP washing. Receptor phosphorylation, internalization and re-expression may be thus dissociated from G protein activation and linked to another active conformation that may influence its trafficking.

Mutation of that conserved amino acid in VPAC₂ could be investigated only by a conservative mutation (N²¹⁶Q) and led to a receptor with a low VIP stimulation of adenylate cyclase, receptor phosphorylation and internalization. This indicated the importance of the conserved N residue in the TM3 of that family of receptors.     

Specific and overlapping sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor functions in human synoviocytes: impact of TNF-alpha

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), via interaction with its G protein-coupled receptors, regulates various physiological and pathological responses. The present study investigated the role of S1P/S1P receptor signaling in several functional responses of human fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) that may contribute to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We report that FLSs express the S1P(1), S1P(2), and S1P(3) receptors. Moreover, exogenously applied S1P induces FLS 1) migration, 2) secretion of inflammatory cytokines/chemokines, and 3) protection from apoptosis. Using specific S1P receptor agonists/antagonists, we determined that S1P stimulates FLS migration through S1P(1) and S1P(3), induces cytokine/chemokine secretion through S1P(2) and S1P(3), and protects from cell apoptosis via S1P(1). The S1P-mediated cell motility and cytokine/chemokine secretion seem to be regulated by the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), p42/44 MAPK, and Rho kinase signal transduction pathways. Interestingly, treatment of FLSs with tumor necrosis factor-alpha increases S1P(3) expression and correlates with the enhancement of S1P-induced cytokine/chemokine production. Our data suggest that S1P(1), S1P(2), and S1P(3) play essential roles in the pathogenesis of RA by modulating FLS migration, cytokine/chemokine production, and cell survival. Moreover, the cytokine-rich environment of the inflamed synovium may synergize with S1P signaling to exacerbate the clinical manifestations of this autoimmune disease.     

Contribution of the carboxyl terminus of the VPAC1 receptor to agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation, internalization, and recycling

When exposed to vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), the human wild type VPAC1 receptor expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells is rapidly phosphorylated, desensitized, and internalized in the endosomal compartment and is not re-expressed at the cell membrane within 2 h after agonist removal. The aims of the present work were first to correlate receptor phosphorylation level to internalization and recycling, measured by flow cytometry and in some cases by confocal microscopy using a monoclonal antibody that did not interfere with ligand binding, and second to identify the phosphorylated Ser/Thr residues. Combining receptor mutations and truncations allowed identification of Ser250 (in the second intracellular loop), Thr429, Ser435, Ser448 or Ser449, and Ser455 (all in the distal part of the C terminus) as candidates for VIP-stimulated phosphorylation. The effects of single mutations were not additive, suggesting alternative phosphorylation sites in mutated receptors. Replacement of all of the Ser/Thr residues in the carboxyl-terminal tail and truncation of the domain containing these residues completely inhibited VIP-stimulated phosphorylation and receptor internalization. There was, however, no direct correlation between receptor phosphorylation and internalization; in some truncated and mutated receptors, a 70% reduction in phosphorylation had little effect on internalization. In contrast to results obtained on the wild type and all of the mutated or truncated receptors that still underwent phosphorylation, internalization of the severely truncated receptor was reversed within 2 h of incubation in the absence of the agonist. Receptor recovery was blocked by monensin, an endosome inhibitor.     

Caenorhabditis elegans RMI2 functional homolog-2 (RMIF-2) and RMI1 (RMH-1) have both overlapping and distinct meiotic functions within the BTR complex

Homologous recombination is a high-fidelity repair pathway for DNA double-strand breaks employed during both mitotic and meiotic cell divisions. Such repair can lead to genetic exchange, originating from crossover (CO) generation. In mitosis, COs are suppressed to prevent sister chromatid exchange. Here, the BTR complex, consisting of the Bloom helicase (HIM-6 in worms), topoisomerase 3 (TOP-3), and the RMI1 (RMH-1 and RMH-2) and RMI2 scaffolding proteins, is essential for dismantling joint DNA molecules to form non-crossovers (NCOs) via decatenation. In contrast, in meiosis COs are essential for accurate chromosome segregation and the BTR complex plays distinct roles in CO and NCO generation at different steps in meiotic recombination. RMI2 stabilizes the RMI1 scaffolding protein, and lack of RMI2 in mitosis leads to elevated sister chromatid exchange, as observed upon RMI1 knockdown. However, much less is known about the involvement of RMI2 in meiotic recombination. So far, RMI2 homologs have been found in vertebrates and plants, but not in lower organisms such as Drosophila, yeast, or worms. We report the identification of the Caenorhabditis elegans functional homolog of RMI2, which we named RMIF-2. The protein shows a dynamic localization pattern to recombination foci during meiotic prophase I and concentration into recombination foci is mutually dependent on other BTR complex proteins. Comparative analysis of the rmif-2 and rmh-1 phenotypes revealed numerous commonalities, including in regulating CO formation and directing COs toward chromosome arms. Surprisingly, the prevalence of heterologous recombination was several fold lower in the rmif-2 mutant, suggesting that RMIF-2 may be dispensable or less strictly required for some BTR complex-mediated activities during meiosis.     

Identification of key residues for interaction of vasoactive intestinal peptide with human VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors and development of a highly selective VPAC1 receptor agonist. Alanine scanning and molecular modeling of the peptide

The widespread neuropeptide vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) has two receptors VPAC(1) and VPAC(2). Solid-phase syntheses of VIP analogs in which each amino acid has been changed to alanine (Ala scan) or glycine was achieved and each analog was tested for: (i) three-dimensional structure by ab initio molecular modeling; (ii) ability to inhibit (125)I-VIP binding (K(i)) and to stimulate adenylyl cyclase activity (EC(50)) in membranes from cell clones stably expressing human recombinant VPAC(1) or VPAC(2) receptor. The data show that substituting residues at 14 positions out of 28 in VIP resulted in a >10-fold increase of K(i) or EC(50) at the VPAC(1) receptor. Modeling of the three-dimensional structure of native VIP (central alpha-helice from Val(5) to Asn(24) with random coiled N and C terminus) and analogs shows that substitutions of His(1), Val(5), Arg(14), Lys(15), Lys(21), Leu(23), and Ile(26) decreased biological activity without altering the predicted structure, supporting that those residues directly interact with VPAC(1) receptor. The interaction of the analogs with human VPAC(2) receptor is similar to that observed with VPAC(1) receptor, with three remarkable exceptions: substitution of Thr(11) and Asn(28) by alanine increased K(i) for binding to VPAC(2) receptor; substitution of Tyr(22) by alanine increased EC(50) for stimulating adenylyl cyclase activity through interaction with the VPAC(2) receptor. By combining 3 mutations at positions 11, 22, and 28, we developed the [Ala(11,22,28)]VIP analog which constitutes the first highly selective (>1,000-fold) human VPAC(1) receptor agonist derived from VIP ever described.     

Hypoxia‐inducible factors 1α and 2α exert both distinct and overlapping functions in long bone development

The hypoxia‐inducible factors have recently been identified as critical regulators of angiogenic–osteogenic coupling. Mice overexpressing HIFα subunits in osteoblasts produce abundant VEGF and develop extremely dense, highly vascularized long bones. In this study, we investigated the individual contributions of Hif‐1α and Hif‐2α in angiogenesis and osteogenesis by individually disrupting each Hifα gene in osteoblasts using the Cre‐loxP method. Mice lacking Hif‐1α demonstrated markedly decreased trabecular bone volume, reduced bone formation rate, and altered cortical bone architecture. By contrast, mice lacking Hif‐2α had only a modest decrease in trabecular bone volume. Interestingly, long bone blood vessel development measured by angiography was decreased by a similar degree in both ΔHif‐1α and ΔHif‐2α mice suggesting a common role for these Hifα subunits in skeletal angiogenesis. In agreement with this idea, osteoblasts lacking either Hif‐1α or Hif‐2α had profound reductions in VEGF mRNA expression but only the loss of Hif‐1α impaired osteoblast proliferation. These findings indicate that expression of both Hif‐1α and Hif‐2α by osteoblasts is required for long bone development. We propose that both Hif‐1α and Hif‐2α function through cell non‐autonomous modes to promote vascularization of bone and that Hif‐1α also promotes bone formation by exerting direct actions on the osteoblast. J. Cell. Biochem. 109: 196–204, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Unique and overlapping functions of the Exo1, Mre11 and Pso2 nucleases in DNA repair

The Mre11 and Pso2 nucleases function in homologous recombination and interstrand cross-link (ICL) repair pathways, respectively, while the Exo1 nuclease is involved in homologous recombination and mismatch repair. Characterization of the sensitivity of single, double and triple mutants for these nucleases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to various DNA damaging agents reveals complex interactions that depend on the type of DNA damage. The pso2 mutant is uniquely sensitive to agents that generate ICLs and mre11-H125N shows the highest sensitivity of the single mutants for ionizing radiation and methyl methane sulfonate. However, elimination of all three nucleases confers higher sensitivity to IR than any of the single or double mutant combinations indicating a high degree of redundancy and versatility in the response to DNA damage. In response to ICL agents, double-strand breaks are still formed in the triple nuclease mutant indicating that none of these nucleases are responsible for unhooking cross-links.     

Human paraoxonases (PON1, PON2, and PON3) are lactonases with overlapping and distinct substrate specificities

The paraoxonase (PON) gene family in humans has three members, PON1, PON2, and PON3. Their physiological role(s) and natural substrates are uncertain. We developed a baculovirus-mediated expression system, suitable for all three human PONs, and optimized procedures for their purification. The recombinant PONs are glycosylated with high-mannose-type sugars, which are important for protein stability but are not essential for their enzymatic activities. Enzymatic characterization of the purified PONs has revealed them to be lactonases/lactonizing enzymes, with some overlapping substrates (e.g., aromatic lactones), but also to have distinctive substrate specificities. All three PONs metabolized very efficiently 5-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid 1,5-lactone and 4-hydroxy-docosahexaenoic acid, which are products of both enzymatic and nonenzymatic oxidation of arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid, respectively, and may represent the PONs' endogenous substrates. Organophosphates are hydrolyzed almost exclusively by PON1, whereas bulky drug substrates such as lovastatin and spironolactone are hydrolyzed only by PON3. Of special interest is the ability of the human PONs, especially PON2, to hydrolyze and thereby inactivate N-acyl-homoserine lactones, which are quorum-sensing signals of pathogenic bacteria. None of the recombinant PONs protected low density lipoprotein against copper-induced oxidation in vitro.     

Two cysteine protease inhibitors, EhICP1 and 2, localized in distinct compartments, negatively regulate secretion in Entamoeba histolytica

The enteric protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica uniquely possesses two isotypes of ICPs, a novel class of inhibitors for cysteine proteases. These two EhICPs showed a remarkable difference in the ability to inhibit cysteine protease (CP) 5, a well-established virulence determinant, whereas they equally inhibited CP1 and CP2. Immunofluorescence imaging and cellular fractionation showed that EhICP1 and EhICP2 are localized to distinct compartments. While EhICP1 is localized to the soluble cytosolic fraction, EhICP2 is targeted from lysosomes to phagosomes upon erythrocyte engulfment. Overexpression of either EhICP1 or EhICP2 caused reduction of intracellular CP activity, but not the amount of CP, and decrease in the secretion of all major CPs, suggesting that both EhICPs are involved in the trafficking and/or interference with the major CP activity. These data indicate that the two EhICPs, present in distinct subcellular compartments, negatively regulate CP secretion, and, thus, the virulence of this parasite.     

Seasonal changes in the expression of PACAP,VPAC1, VPAC2, PAC1 and testicular activity in the testis of the muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus)

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) plays an important role in the steroidogenesis and spermatogenesis in the testis through its receptors PAC1, VPAC1 and VPAC2. In this study, we investigated the seasonal expressions of PACAP, PAC1, VPAC1, VPAC2, luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR), follicle stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR), steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3β-HSD) and CYP17A1 in the testis of male muskrat during the breeding season and non-breeding season, respectively. Histologically, we observed the presence of Leydig cells, Sertoli cells and various types of germ cells in the testis during the breeding season, yet only Leydig cells, Sertoli cells, spermatogonia and primary spermatocyte during the non-breeding season. In addition, the immunohistochemical localizations of PACAP and VPAC1 were identified in the Leydig cells, spermatogonia and spermatozoa during the breeding season, while only in the Leydig cells and spermatogonia during the non-breeding season, and PAC1 and VPAC2 were localized in the Leydig cells in both seasons, among which LHR, StAR, 3β-HSD and CYP17A1 were also expressed. Meanwhile, the protein and mRNA expression levels of PACAP, PAC1, VPAC1, VPAC2, LHR, FSHR, StAR, 3β-HSD and CYP17A1 in the testis during the breeding season were significantly higher than those during the non-breeding season. These results suggested that PACAP is involved in the regulation of steroidogenesis and spermatogenesis via an endocrine, autocrine or paracrine manner in the testis of muskrat.Key words: Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP), PACAP receptors, steroidogenesis, testis, Ondatra zibethicus.     

Interleukins 19, 20, and 24 signal through two distinct receptor complexes. Differences in receptor-ligand interactions mediate unique biological functions

Cytokines that signal through Class II receptors form a distinct family that includes the interferons and interleukin 10 (IL-10). Recent identification of several IL-10 homologs has defined a cytokine subfamily that includes AK155, IL-19, IL-20, IL-22, and IL-24. Within this subfamily, IL-19, IL-20, and IL-24 exhibit substantial sharing of receptor complexes; all three are capable of signaling through IL-20RA/IL-20RB, and IL-20 and IL-24 both can also use IL-22R/IL-20RB. However, the biological effects of these three cytokines appear quite distinct: immune activity with IL-19, skin biology with IL-20, and tumor apoptosis with IL-24. To more fully elucidate their interactions with the receptor complexes, we have performed a series of in vitro assays. Reporter, proliferation, and direct STAT activation assays using cell lines expressing transfected receptors revealed differences between the receptor complexes. IL-19 and IL-24 also exhibited growth inhibition on a cell line endogenously expressing all three receptor subunits, an effect that was seen at cytokine levels two orders of magnitude above those required for STAT activation or proliferation. These results demonstrate that, although this subclass exhibits receptor complex redundancy, there are differences in ligand/receptor interactions and in signal transduction that may lead to specificity and a distinct biology for each cytokine.     

Raptor and Rheb negatively regulate skeletal myogenesis through suppression of insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1)

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is essential for skeletal myogenesis through controlling distinct cellular pathways. The importance of the canonical mTOR complex 1 signaling components, including raptor, S6K1, and Rheb, had been suggested in muscle maintenance, growth, and metabolism. However, the role of those components in myogenic differentiation is not entirely clear. In this study we have investigated the functions of raptor, S6K1, and Rheb in the differentiation of C2C12 mouse myoblasts. We find that although mTOR knockdown severely impairs myogenic differentiation as expected, the knockdown of raptor, as well as Rheb, enhances differentiation. Consistent with a negative role for these proteins in myogenesis, overexpression of raptor or Rheb inhibits C2C12 differentiation. On the other hand, neither knockdown nor overexpression of S6K1 has any effect. Moreover, the enhanced differentiation elicited by raptor or Rheb knockdown is accompanied by increased Akt activation, elevated IRS1 protein levels, and decreased Ser-307 (human Ser-312) phosphorylation on IRS1. Finally, IRS1 knockdown eliminated the enhancement in differentiation elicited by raptor or Rheb knockdown, suggesting that IRS1 is a critical mediator of the myogenic functions of raptor and Rheb. In conclusion, the Rheb-mTOR/raptor pathway negatively regulates myogenic differentiation by suppressing IRS1-PI3K-Akt signaling. These findings underscore the versatility of mTOR signaling in biological regulations and implicate the existence of novel mTOR complexes and/or signaling mechanism in skeletal myogenesis.     

Ccm3 functions in a manner distinct from Ccm1 and Ccm2 in a zebrafish model of CCM vascular disease

Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are vascular anomalies of the central nervous system that arise due to mutations in genes encoding three unrelated proteins: CCM1 (KRIT1); CCM2 (Malcavernin/OSM) and CCM3 (PDCD10). Both biochemical and mutant studies suggest that CCM1 and CCM2 act as part of a physical complex to regulate vascular morphogenesis and integrity. In contrast, mouse Ccm3 mutant and in vitro cell culture data suggests an independent role for Ccm3. In this study, we sought to use the zebrafish model system to examine for the first time the role of ccm3 in cranial vessel development. We report that inhibition of zebrafish ccm3a/b causes heart and circulation defects distinct from those seen in ccm1 (santa) and ccm2 (valentine) mutants, and leads to a striking dilation and mispatterning of cranial vessels reminiscent of the human disease pathology. ccm3, but not ccm2, defects can be rescued upon overexpression of stk25b, a GCKIII kinase previously shown to interact with CCM3. Morpholino knockdown of the GCKIII gene stk25b results in heart and vasculature defects similar to those seen in ccm3 morphants. Finally, additional loss of ccm3 in ccm2 mutants leads to a synergistic increase in cranial vessel dilation. These results support a model in which CCM3 plays a role distinct from CCM1/2 in CCM pathogenesis, and acts via GCKIII activity to regulate cranial vasculature integrity and development. CCM3/GCKIII activity provides a novel therapeutic target for CCMs, as well as for the modulation of vascular permeability.     

MyoD induces the expression of p57Kip2 in cells lacking p21Cip1/Waf1: overlapping and distinct functions of the two cdk inhibitors

The myogenic factor MyoD induces the expression of the cdk inhibitor p21 to promote cell cycle withdrawal in differentiating myoblasts. Although the cdk inhibitor p57 is also highly expressed in skeletal muscle and is thought to redundantly control myogenesis, little is known about its regulation, that has been suggested to be independent of MyoD. Here we show, for the first time, that MyoD is capable to induce the expression of p57. Intriguingly, this ability is restricted to cells lacking p21, suggesting that the two cdk inhibitors may be expressed in different muscle cell lineages. We also suggest that the functions of p21 and p57 in myoblast cells are only in part redundant. In fact, while the two cdk inhibitors play a similar role in cells undergoing G1 arrest during MyoD-induced differentiation, p57 does not replace p21 in cells escaping G1 arrest and undergoing MyoD-induced apoptosis. This difference can be ascribed both to a different subcellular localization and to a differential ability of the two cdk inhibitors to interact with cell cycle regulators.