Small RNA binding is a common strategy to suppress RNA silencing by several viral suppressors

RNA silencing is an evolutionarily conserved system that functions as an antiviral mechanism in higher plants and insects. To counteract RNA silencing, viruses express silencing suppressors that interfere with both siRNA- and microRNA-guided silencing pathways. We used comparative in vitro and in vivo approaches to analyse the molecular mechanism of suppression by three well-studied silencing suppressors. We found that silencing suppressors p19, p21 and HC-Pro each inhibit the intermediate step of RNA silencing via binding to siRNAs, although the molecular features required for duplex siRNA binding differ among the three proteins. None of the suppressors affected the activity of preassembled RISC complexes. In contrast, each suppressor uniformly inhibited the siRNA-initiated RISC assembly pathway by preventing RNA silencing initiator complex formation.     

A structural perspective of the protein–RNA interactions involved in virus-induced RNA silencing and its suppression

Small RNAs, including small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs) and Piwi-associated interfering RNAs (piRNAs), are powerful gene expression regulators. This RNA-mediated regulation results in sequence-specific inhibition of gene expression by translational repression and/or mRNA degradation. siRNAs and miRNAs are generated by RNase III enzymes and subsequently loaded into Argonaute protein, a key component of the RNA induced silencing complex (RISC), to form the core of the RNA silencing machinery. RNA silencing acts as an ancient cell defense system against molecular parasites, such as transgenes, viruses and transposons. RNA silencing also plays an important role in the control of development. In plants, RNA silencing serves as a potent antiviral defense system. In response, many viruses have developed strategies to suppress RNA silencing. The striking sequence diversity among viral suppressors suggests that different viral suppressors could target different components of the RNA silencing machinery at different steps in different suppressing modes. Significant progresses have been made in this field for the past 5 years on the basis of structural information derived from RNase III family proteins, Dicer fragments and homologs, Argonaute homologs and viral suppressors. In this paper, we will review the current progress on the understanding of molecular mechanisms of RNA silencing; highlight the structural principles determining the protein–RNA recognition events along the RNA silencing pathways and the suppression mechanisms displayed by viral suppressors.     

Crystal structure of p19--a universal suppressor of RNA silencing

RNA silencing in plants has an antiviral role and, consequently, plant viruses encode counter-defensive suppressor proteins that block this process. The recently reported crystal structure of two Tombusvirus suppressor proteins reveals a novel RNA-binding structure and illustrates precisely how the silencing mechanism is blocked. These suppressor protein structures, combined with molecular analyses of their effects in animal and plant cells, are informative about RNA silencing mechanisms. They also suggest various ways that Tombusvirus suppressors can be used to investigate RNA silencing in plants and animals.     

Suppressors of RNA silencing encoded by plant viruses and their role in viral infections

RNA silencing as a robust host defense mechanism against plant viruses is generally countered by virus-encoded silencing suppressors. This strategy is now increasingly recognized to be used by animal viruses as well. We present here an overview of the common features shared by some of the better studied plant viral silencing suppressors. We then briefly describe the characteristics of the few reported animal viral suppressors, notably their extraordinary ability of cross-kingdom suppression. We next discuss the basis for biased protection of viral RNA and subviral parasites by silencing suppressors, the link between movement and silencing suppression, the influence of temperature on the outcome of viral infection and the effect of viral silencing suppressors on the microRNA pathway.     

Double-stranded RNA binding may be a general plant RNA viral strategy to suppress RNA silencing

In plants, RNA silencing (RNA interference) is an efficient antiviral system, and therefore successful virus infection requires suppression of silencing. Although many viral silencing suppressors have been identified, the molecular basis of silencing suppression is poorly understood. It is proposed that various suppressors inhibit RNA silencing by targeting different steps. However, as double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) play key roles in silencing, it was speculated that dsRNA binding might be a general silencing suppression strategy. Indeed, it was shown that the related aureusvirus P14 and tombusvirus P19 suppressors are dsRNA-binding proteins. Interestingly, P14 is a size-independent dsRNA-binding protein, while P19 binds only 21-nucleotide ds-sRNAs (small dsRNAs having 2-nucleotide 3' overhangs), the specificity determinant of the silencing system. Much evidence supports the idea that P19 inhibits silencing by sequestering silencing-generated viral ds-sRNAs. In this study we wanted to test the hypothesis that dsRNA binding is a general silencing suppression strategy. Here we show that many plant viral silencing suppressors bind dsRNAs. Beet yellows virus Peanut P21, clump virus P15, Barley stripe mosaic virus gammaB, and Tobacco etch virus HC-Pro, like P19, bind ds-sRNAs size-selectively, while Turnip crinkle virus CP is a size-independent dsRNA-binding protein, which binds long dsRNAs as well as ds-sRNAs. We propose that size-selective ds-sRNA-binding suppressors inhibit silencing by sequestering viral ds-sRNAs, whereas size-independent dsRNA-binding suppressors inactivate silencing by sequestering long dsRNA precursors of viral sRNAs and/or by binding ds-sRNAs. The findings that many unrelated silencing suppressors bind dsRNA suggest that dsRNA binding is a general silencing suppression strategy which has evolved independently many times.     

RNA 沉默的病毒抑制子

RNA 沉默是一种在真核生物体内普遍保守的、通过核酸序列特异性的相互作用来抑制基因表达的调控机制 . RNA 沉默的一种重要生物学效应是防御病毒的侵染,而针对寄主的这种防御机制,许多植物病毒已演化通过编码 RNA 沉默的抑制子来克服这种防御反应 . 目前,已从植物、动物和人类病毒中鉴定了 20 多种 RNA 沉默的抑制子,围绕抑制子的鉴定和作用机理研究已成为病毒学研究的一个热点 . 对 RNA 沉默抑制子的发现、鉴定方法、作用机理及与病毒病症状形成的关系、动物病毒的沉默抑制子等方面的最新进展做了综述,并对沉默抑制子的应用和存在的问题进行了讨论 .     

Dissecting RNA silencing in protoplasts uncovers novel effects of viral suppressors on the silencing pathway at the cellular level

Short interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated RNA silencing plays an important role in cellular defence against viral infection and abnormal gene expression in multiple organisms. Many viruses have evolved silencing suppressors for counter-defence. We have developed an RNA silencing system in the protoplasts of Nicotiana benthamiana to investigate the functions of viral suppressors at the cellular level. We showed that RNA silencing against a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene in the protoplasts could be induced rapidly and specifically by co-transfection with the reporter gene and various silencing inducers [i.e. siRNA, double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) or plasmid encoding dsRNA]. Using this system, we uncovered novel roles of some viral suppressors. Notably, the Cucumber mosaic virus 2b protein, shown previously to function predominantly by preventing the long-distance transmission of systemic silencing signals, was a very strong silencing suppressor in the protoplasts. Some suppressors thought to interfere with upstream steps of siRNA production appeared to also act downstream. Therefore, a viral suppressor can affect multiple steps of the RNA silencing pathway. Our analyses suggest that protoplast-based transient RNA silencing is a useful experimental system to investigate the functions of viral suppressors and further dissect the mechanistic details of the RNA silencing pathway in single cells.     

昆虫RNA沉默抗病毒机制研究进展

RNA沉默是昆虫用来抵御病毒入侵的一种普遍而又进化保守的防御机制, 而昆虫病毒也会相应地编码沉默抑制子来破坏宿主的防御功能。本文主要结合果蝇的相关研究成果对昆虫RNA沉默抗病毒机制、 RNA沉默抑制子的作用特征及宿主与病毒的共进化关系做一综述。研究表明, 由小干扰RNA (small interfering RNAs, siRNA)介导的RNA干扰在果蝇抗病毒防御机制中发挥重要作用。果蝇中Dicer-2（Dcr-2）, argonaute-2（AGO2）和双链RNA结合蛋白R2D2是siRNA干扰途径中的3个关键组分, 这3个基因的缺失或突变会显著提高果蝇对RNA病毒的感受性。此外, 果蝇中还鉴定了其他与RNA干扰密切相关的基因, 如vasa intronic gene, aubergine, armitage, rm62 和piwi, 它们在抗病毒感染中同样发挥重要作用。果蝇病毒中已鉴定出3种RNA沉默病毒抑制子（viral suppressors of RNAi, VSRs）, 分别为果蝇FHV病毒沉默抑制子FHV-B2、 果蝇C病毒沉默抑制子DCV-1A及果蝇CrPV病毒沉默抑制子CrPV-1A。FHV-B2和DCV-1A通过与dsRNA或siRNA结合抑制RNA沉默, 而CrPV-1A通过与AGO2结合阻止RISC的形成抑制RNA沉默。在漫长的进化过程中, 病毒和宿主相互博弈, 协同进化。昆虫抗病毒沉默途径中的关键组分通过保持持续和快速进化来对抗高度变异的VSRs。     

Silencing suppressors: viral weapons for countering host cell defenses

RNA silencing is a conserved eukaryotic pathway involved in the suppression of gene expression via sequence-specific interactions that are mediated by 21–23 nt RNA molecules. During infection, RNAi can act as an innate immune system to defend against viruses. As a counter-defensive strategy, silencing suppressors are encoded by viruses to inhibit various stages of the silencing process. These suppressors are diverse in sequence and structure and act via different mechanisms. In this review, we discuss whether RNAi is a defensive strategy in mammalian host cells and whether silencing suppressors can be encoded by mammalian viruses. We also review the modes of action proposed for some silencing suppressors.     

Cell-to-cell movement of potato potexvirus X is dependent on suppression of RNA silencing

RNA silencing in transgenic and virus-infected plants involves a mobile silencing signal that can move cell-to-cell and systemically through the plant. It is thought that this signal can influence long-distance movement of viruses because protein suppressors of silencing encoded in viral genomes are required for long-distance virus movement. However, until now, it was not known whether the mobile signal could also influence short-range virus movement between cells. Here, through random mutation analysis of the Potato Potexvirus X (PVX) silencing suppressor P25, we provide evidence that it does. All mutants that were defective for silencing suppression were also non-functional in viral cell-to-cell movement. However, we identified mutant P25 proteins that were functional as silencing suppressors but not as movement proteins and we conclude that suppression of silencing is not sufficient to allow virus movement between cells: there must be a second P25 function that is independent of silencing but also required for cell-to-cell movement. Consistent with this hypothesis, we identified two classes of suppressor-inactive P25 mutants. One class of these mutants is proposed to be functional for the accessory function because their failure to support PVX movement could be complemented by heterologous suppressors of silencing. The second class of P25 mutants is considered defective for both the suppressor and second functions because the heterologous silencing suppressors did not restore virus movement. It is possible, based on analyses of short interfering RNA accumulation, that P25 suppresses silencing by interfering with either assembly or function of the effector complexes of RNA silencing.     

A structured viroid RNA serves as a substrate for dicer-like cleavage to produce biologically active small RNAs but is resistant to RNA-induced silencing complex-mediated degradation

RNA silencing is a potent means of antiviral defense in plants and animals. A hallmark of this defense response is the production of 21- to 24-nucleotide viral small RNAs via mechanisms that remain to be fully understood. Many viruses encode suppressors of RNA silencing, and some viral RNAs function directly as silencing suppressors as counterdefense. The occurrence of viroid-specific small RNAs in infected plants suggests that viroids can trigger RNA silencing in a host, raising the question of how these noncoding and unencapsidated RNAs survive cellular RNA-silencing systems. We address this question by characterizing the production of small RNAs of Potato spindle tuber viroid (srPSTVds) and investigating how PSTVd responds to RNA silencing. Our molecular and biochemical studies provide evidence that srPSTVds were derived mostly from the secondary structure of viroid RNAs. Replication of PSTVd was resistant to RNA silencing, although the srPSTVds were biologically active in guiding RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC)-mediated cleavage, as shown with a sensor system. Further analyses showed that without possessing or triggering silencing suppressor activities, the PSTVd secondary structure played a critical role in resistance to RISC-mediated cleavage. These findings support the hypothesis that some infectious RNAs may have evolved specific secondary structures as an effective means to evade RNA silencing in addition to encoding silencing suppressor activities. Our results should have important implications in further studies on RNA-based mechanisms of host-pathogen interactions and the biological constraints that shape the evolution of infectious RNA structures.     

Effects and side-effects of viral RNA silencing suppressors on short RNAs

In eukaryotes, short RNAs play a crucial regulatory role in many processes including development, maintenance of genome stability and antiviral responses. These different but overlapping RNA-guided pathways are collectively termed 'RNA silencing'. To counteract an antiviral RNA silencing response, plant viruses express silencing suppressor proteins. Recent results have shown that silencing suppressors operate by modifying the accumulation and/or activity of short RNAs involved in the antiviral response. Because RNA silencing pathways intersect, silencing suppressors can also inhibit other short-RNA-regulated pathways. Thus, suppressors contribute to viral symptoms. These findings fuel further research to test whether certain symptoms caused by animal viruses are also manifestations of altered RNA regulatory pathways.     

Multiple domains of the tobacco mosaic virus p126 protein can independently suppress local and systemic RNA silencing

Small RNA-mediated RNA silencing is a widespread antiviral mechanism in plants and other organisms. Many viruses encode suppressors of RNA silencing for counter-defense. The p126 protein encoded by Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) has been reported to be a suppressor of RNA silencing but the mechanism of its function remains unclear. This protein is unique among the known plant viral silencing suppressors because of its large size and multiple domains. Here, we report that the methyltransferase, helicase, and nonconserved region II (NONII) of p126 each has silencing-suppressor function. The silencing-suppression activities of methyltransferase and helicase can be uncoupled from their enzyme activities. Specific amino acids in NONII previously shown to be crucial for viral accumulation and symptom development are also crucial for silencing suppression. These results suggest that some viral proteins have evolved to possess modular structural domains that can independently interfere with host silencing, and that this may be an effective mechanism of increasing the robustness of a virus.     

Polerovirus protein P0 prevents the assembly of small RNA‐containing RISC complexes and leads to degradation of ARGONAUTE1

RNA silencing plays an important role in plants in defence against viruses. To overcome this defence, plant viruses encode suppressors of RNA silencing. The most common mode of silencing suppression is sequestration of double‐stranded RNAs involved in the antiviral silencing pathways. Viral suppressors can also overcome silencing responses through protein–protein interaction. The poleroviral P0 silencing suppressor protein targets ARGONAUTE (AGO) proteins for degradation. AGO proteins are the core component of the RNA‐induced silencing complex (RISC). We found that P0 does not interfere with the slicer activity of pre‐programmed siRNA/miRNA containing AGO1, but prevents de novo formation of siRNA/miRNA containing AGO1. We show that the AGO1 protein is part of a high‐molecular‐weight complex, suggesting the existence of a multi‐protein RISC in plants. We propose that P0 prevents RISC assembly by interacting with one of its protein components, thus inhibiting formation of siRNA/miRNA–RISC, and ultimately leading to AGO1 degradation. Our findings also suggest that siRNAs enhance the stability of co‐expressed AGO1 in both the presence and absence of P0.     

RNA沉默在植物生物逆境反应中的作用

RNA沉默是真核生物共有的基因表达调节机制和防御机制。在植物RNA沉默中, 一些小RNAs, 如微小 RNAs和小干扰RNAs, 在植物防御病毒、细菌或食草动物的反应中具有重要作用。为了抑制宿主的RNA沉默系统, 植物病毒或细菌进化出了在RNA沉默不同阶段起作用的病毒沉默抑制子或细菌沉默抑制子, 来克服寄主的RNA沉默反应。文章就植物RNA沉默、病毒沉默抑制子、细菌沉默抑制子及其相关防御反应的一些新进展做一概述。     

RNA干扰与植物抗病毒

RNA干扰是多种生物体内由双链RNA介导的同源mRNA降解现象,是植物体内天然的抗病毒机制。然而病毒在长期进化过程中也获得了通过编码沉默抑制蛋白来对抗植物体RNAi系统的能力。本文对RNA干扰过程、病毒编码的沉默抑制蛋白及利用干扰技术进行抗病毒基因工程研究进行简要综述。     

假马鞭曲叶病毒和中国胜红蓟黄脉病毒C4蛋白是RNA沉默的抑制子

为了研究中国胜红蓟黄脉病毒(Ageratum yellow vein Chin virus,AYVCNV)和假马鞭曲叶病毒(Stachytarpheta leafcurl virus,StaLCV)C4蛋白的功能,利用烟草脆裂病毒(Tobacco rattle virus,TRV)载体在本氏烟(Nicotianabenthamiana)中分别表达了这两种病毒的C4蛋白,结果发现它们均能在本氏烟中引起类似于病毒侵染的症状,推测AYVCNV和StaLCV的C4蛋白是病毒的致病因子;在RNA沉默的抑制试验中,AYVCNV和StaLCV的C4蛋白均能够在表达gfp基因的转基因本氏烟(16c)上抑制由gfp基因正义链引起的基因沉默的建立,证明它们都是RNA沉默的抑制子。     

A dual strategy for the suppression of host antiviral silencing: two distinct suppressors for viral replication and viral movement encoded by potato virus M

Viruses encode RNA silencing suppressors to counteract host antiviral silencing. In this study, we analyzed the suppressors encoded by potato virus M (PVM), a member of the genus Carlavirus. In the conventional green fluorescent protein transient coexpression assay, the cysteine-rich protein (CRP) of PVM inhibited both local and systemic silencing, whereas the triple gene block protein 1 (TGBp1) showed suppressor activity only on systemic silencing. Furthermore, to elucidate the roles of these two suppressors during an active viral infection, we performed PVX vector-based assays and viral movement complementation assays. CRP increased the accumulation of viral RNA at the single-cell level and also enhanced viral cell-to-cell movement by inhibiting RNA silencing. However, TGBp1 facilitated viral movement but did not affect viral accumulation in protoplasts. These data suggest that CRP inhibits RNA silencing primarily at the viral replication step, whereas TGBp1 is a suppressor that acts at the viral movement step. Thus, our findings demonstrate a sophisticated viral infection strategy that suppresses host antiviral silencing at two different steps via two mechanistically distinct suppressors. This study is also the first report of the RNA silencing suppressor in the genus Carlavirus.