GEFs, GAPs, GDIs and effectors: taking a closer (3D) look at the regulation of Ras-related GTP-binding proteins

Cell biology depends on the interactions of macromolecules, such as protein—DNA, protein—protein or protein—nucleotide interactions. GTP-binding proteins are no exception to the rule. They regulate cellular processes as diverse as protein biosynthesis and intracellular membrane trafficking. Recently, a large number of genes encoding GTP-binding proteins and the proteins that interact witht these molecular switches have been cloned and expressed. The 3D structures of some of these have also been elucidated     

Visualisation of transgene expression at the single protoplast level

Protoplasts are currently used to study the expression of genes following transformation. Expression is followed on a population of protoplasts after total protein extraction by conventional western blotting or measure of the enzymatic activity of the transgenic protein. We describe here a new method, called protoplast printing, allowing easy detection of the fraction of cells expressing a certain protein within a population of protoplasts. It consists of immobilization of the protoplast proteins on a nitrocellulose filter, so as to retain the outlines of the cell, followed by immunological detection of the protein of interest. The only special requirement is an antibody specific for the protein. We have studied the expression of the BNYVV coat protein after electroporation of Chenopodium quinoa protoplasts with viral RNAs, and the expression of the NPT II gene in protoplasts isolated from transgenic tobacco plants as well as after direct transfer of plasmid DNA into tobacco protoplasts. In both cases — infection with viral RNAs and transformation with plasmid DNA — expressing and non-expressing cells can be distinguished as early as 12h after transfer of the transgenes.Abbreviations BCIP 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate - BNYVV beet necrotic yellow vein virus - CaMV Cauliflower Mosaic Virus - NBT nitroblue tetrazolium chloride - NPT II Neomycin phospho transferase     

Analysis of egg protein in five carps

Quantitative and qualitative studies of proteins from the mature eggs of five carps—Cirrhinus mrigala, Labeo rohita, Cyprinus carpio, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, Ctenopharyngodon idella were made. It is found that there is much difference both in the quantity and quality of proteins in these five species. As egg proteins in a species depend on the genome, it is suggested that the study of these protein types may be considered as an additional parameter for characterisation of the fish types.     

Triadic proteins of skeletal muscle

Biochemical approaches toward understanding the mechanism of muscle excitation have in recent years been directed to identification and isolation of proteins of the triad junction. The principal protein described—the junctional foot protein (JFP)—was initially identified by morphological criteria and isolated using antibody-affinity chromatography. Subsequently this protein was described as the ryanodine receptor. It has been isolated and incorporated into lipid bilayers as a cation channel. This in its turn has directed attention toward the transverse (T)-tubular junctional constituents. Three approaches employing the JFP as a probe toward identifying these moieties on the T-tubule are described here. The binding of the JFP to the dihydropyridine receptor, which has been hypothesized to be the voltage sensor in excitation-contraction coupling, is also discussed. The detailed architecture and function of T-tubular proteins remain to be resolved.Abbreviations DHP dihydropyridine - GAPD glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase - IP₃ inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate - JFP junctional foot protein - SDS-PAGE sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis - SR sarcoplasmic reticulum - TC terminal cisterna - T-tubule transverse tubule     

Mapping of genes on the chloroplast DNA of Spirodela oligorhiza

With the use of spinach chloroplast RNAs as probes, we have mapped the rRNA genes and a number of protein genes on the chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) of the duckweed Spirodela oligorhiz. For a more precise mapping of these genes we had to extend the previously determined [14] restriction endonuclease map of the duckweed cpDNA with the cleavage sites for the restriction endonucleases Sma I and Bgl I. The physical map indicates that duckweed cpDNA contains two inverted repeat regions (18 Md) separated by two single copy regions with a size of 19 Md and 67 Md, respectively.By hybridization with spinach chloroplast rRNAs it could be shown that each of the two repeat units contains one set of rRNA genes in the order: 16S rRNA gene — spacer — 23S rRNA gene — 5S rRNA gene.A spinach chloroplast mRNA preparation (14S RNA), which is predominantly translated into a 32 Kilodalton (Kd) protein [9], hybridized strongly to a DNA fragment in the large single copy region, immediately outside one of the inverted repeats. With another mRNA preparation (18S), which mainly directs the in vitro synthesis of a 55 Kd protein [9], hybridization was observed with two DNA regions, located between 211° and 233° and between 137° and 170°, respectively. Finally, with a spinach chloroplast genomic probe for the large subunit of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase [17], hybridization was found with a DNA fragment located between 137° and 158° on the map.     

A vector projection method for predicting supersecondary motifs

For the 11 types of most frequently occurring supersecondary motifs, we used a new method—the vector projection method—to predict a protein's supersecondary structure. In a training set of peptides and a test set of peptides we obtained a satisfactory result, with a prediction accuracy of about 90%. The high prediction accuracy indicates that this method is reasonable for predicting the folding motifs of proteins. This work provides insight into the problem of predicting a protein's local structure accurately, and is of particular value in protein modeling, prediction, and molecule design.     

Photoactivatable Reagents Based on Aryl(trifluoromethyl)diazirines: Synthesis and Application for Studying Nucleic Acid–Protein Interactions

Recent data on the synthesis of photoactivatable derivatives of nucleic acids and proteins on the basis of aryl(trifluoromethyl)diazirines—analogs of nucleosides, nucleotides, oligonucleotides, as well as amino acids and peptides—are reviewed. The synthesis of bi- and polyfunctional photoactivatable reagents, including those containing a cleavable function, designed for postsynthetic modification of biopolymers is described. Data are given on the use of the photoactivatable derivatives for studying nucleic acid–protein interactions by the method of photoaffinity labeling. Special consideration is paid to the results obtained by the authors" team in cooperation with other researchers as well as graduate students of the Chemistry of Natural Products Chair, Chemical Faculty, Moscow State University and destined to solve various scientific tasks in the domain of nucleic acid–protein recognition with the use of photoaffinity crosslinking.     

Evolutionary Aspects of Protein Structure and Folding

Four basic stages of evolution of protein structure are described, basing on recent work of the authors aimed specifically to reconstruct the earliest events in the protein evolution. According to this reconstruction, the initial stage of short peptides comprising, probably, only a few amino acid residues had been followed by formation of closed loops of 25–30 residues, which corresponds to the polymer-statistically optimal ring closure size for mixed polypeptide chains. The next stage involved fusion of relatively small linear genes and formation of protein structures consisting of several closed loops of a nearly standard size, with 4–6 loops (100–200 amino acid residues) in a typical protein fold. The last, modern stage began with combinatorial fusion of the presumably circular 300–600 bp DNA units and, accordingly, formation of multidomain proteins.     

Structural motifs in protein cores and at protein–protein interfaces are different

Structures of proteins and protein–protein complexes are determined by the same physical principles and thus share a number of similarities. At the same time, there could be differences because in order to function, proteins interact with other molecules, undergo conformations changes, and so forth, which might impose different restraints on the tertiary versus quaternary structures. This study focuses on structural properties of protein–protein interfaces in comparison with the protein core, based on the wealth of currently available structural data and new structure‐based approaches. The results showed that physicochemical characteristics, such as amino acid composition, residue–residue contact preferences, and hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity distributions, are similar in protein core and protein–protein interfaces. On the other hand, characteristics that reflect the evolutionary pressure, such as structural composition and packing, are largely different. The results provide important insight into fundamental properties of protein structure and function. At the same time, the results contribute to better understanding of the ways to dock proteins. Recent progress in predicting structures of individual proteins follows the advancement of deep learning techniques and new approaches to residue coevolution data. Protein core could potentially provide large amounts of data for application of the deep learning to docking. However, our results showed that the core motifs are significantly different from those at protein–protein interfaces, and thus may not be directly useful for docking. At the same time, such difference may help to overcome a major obstacle in application of the coevolutionary data to docking—discrimination of the intramolecular information not directly relevant to docking.     

The 68 kDa DNA compacting nucleoid protein from soybean chloroplasts inhibits DNA synthesis in vitro

Nucleoids were purified from chloroplasts of dividing soybean cells and their polypeptide composition analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Of the 15–20 nucleoid-associated polypeptides, several demonstrated DNA binding activity. Upon disruption of the nucleoids with high concentrations of NaCl, a subset of these proteins and the majority of chloroplast DNA were recovered in the supernatant after centrifugation. Removal of the salt by dialysis resulted in formation of nucleoprotein complexes resembling genuine nucleoids. Purification of these structures revealed three major proteins of 68, 35 and 18 kDa. After purification of the 68 kDa protein to homogeneity, this protein was able to compact purified chloroplast DNA into a nucleoid-like structure in a protein concentration-dependent fashion. Addition of the 68 kDa protein to an in vitro chloroplast DNA replication system resulted in complete inhibition of nucleotide incorporation at concentrations above 300 ng of 68 kDa protein per g of template DNA. These results led to in situ immunofluorescence studies of chloroplasts replicating DNA which suggested that newly synthesized DNA is not co-localized with nucleoids. Presumably, either the plastid replication machinery has means of removing nucleoid proteins prior to replication or the concentration of nucleoid proteins is tightly regulated and the proteins turned over in order to allow replication to proceed.     

DNA asymmetry promotes SUMO modification of the single‐stranded DNA‐binding protein RPA

Repair of DNA double‐stranded breaks by homologous recombination (HR) is dependent on DNA end resection and on post‐translational modification of repair factors. In budding yeast, single‐stranded DNA is coated by replication protein A (RPA) following DNA end resection, and DNA–RPA complexes are then SUMO‐modified by the E3 ligase Siz2 to promote repair. Here, we show using enzymatic assays that DNA duplexes containing 3'' single‐stranded DNA overhangs increase the rate of RPA SUMO modification by Siz2. The SAP domain of Siz2 binds DNA duplexes and makes a key contribution to this process as highlighted by models and a crystal structure of Siz2 and by assays performed using protein mutants. Enzymatic assays performed using DNA that can accommodate multiple RPA proteins suggest a model in which the SUMO‐RPA signal is amplified by successive rounds of Siz2‐dependent SUMO modification of RPA and dissociation of SUMO‐RPA at the junction between single‐ and double‐stranded DNA. Our results provide insights on how DNA architecture scaffolds a substrate and E3 ligase to promote SUMO modification in the context of DNA repair.     

Helix kinks are equally prevalent in soluble and membrane proteins

Helix kinks are a common feature of α‐helical membrane proteins, but are thought to be rare in soluble proteins. In this study we find that kinks are a feature of long α‐helices in both soluble and membrane proteins, rather than just transmembrane α‐helices. The apparent rarity of kinks in soluble proteins is due to the relative infrequency of long helices (≥20 residues) in these proteins. We compare length‐matched sets of soluble and membrane helices, and find that the frequency of kinks, the role of Proline, the patterns of other amino acid around kinks (allowing for the expected differences in amino acid distributions between the two types of protein), and the effects of hydrogen bonds are the same for the two types of helices. In both types of protein, helices that contain Proline in the second and subsequent turns are very frequently kinked. However, there are a sizeable proportion of kinked helices that do not contain a Proline in either their sequence or sequence homolog. Moreover, we observe that in soluble proteins, kinked helices have a structural preference in that they typically point into the solvent. Proteins 2014; 82:1960–1970. © 2014 The Authors. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Molecular architecture of bacteriophage T4

In studying bacteriophage T4—one of the basic models of molecular biology for several decades—there has come a Renaissance, and this virus is now actively used as object of structural biology. The structures of six proteins of the phage particle have recently been determined at atomic resolution by X-ray crystallography. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the infection device—one of the most complex multiprotein components—has been developed on the basis of cryo-electron microscopy images. The further study of bacteriophage T4 structure will allow a better understanding of the regulation of protein folding, assembly of biological structures, and also mechanisms of functioning of the complex biological molecular machines.Translated from Biokhimiya, Vol. 69, No. 11, 2004, pp. 1463–1476.Original Russian Text Copyright © 2004 by Mesyanzhinov, Leiman, Kostyuchenko, Kurochkina, Miroshnikov, Sykilinda, Shneider.     

The order of PDZ3 and TrpCage in fusion chimeras determines their properties—a biophysical characterization

Most of the structural proteins known today are composed of domains that carry their own functions while keeping their structural properties. It is supposed that such domains, when taken out of the context of the whole protein, can retain their original structure and function to a certain extent. Information on the specific functional and structural characteristics of individual domains in a new context of artificial fusion proteins may help to reveal the rules of internal and external domain communication. Moreover, this could also help explain the mechanism of such communication and address how the mutual allosteric effect plays a role in a such multi‐domain protein system. The simple model system of the two‐domain fusion protein investigated in this work consisted of a well‐folded PDZ3 domain and an artificially designed small protein domain called Tryptophan Cage (TrpCage). Two fusion proteins with swapped domain order were designed to study their structural and functional features as well as their biophysical properties. The proteins composed of PDZ3 and TrpCage, both identical in amino acid sequence but different in composition (PDZ3‐TrpCage, TrpCage‐PDZ3), were studied using circualr dichroism (CD) spectrometry, analytical ultracentrifugation, and molecular dynamic simulations. The biophysical analysis uncovered different structural and denaturation properties of both studied proteins, revealing their different unfolding pathways and dynamics.     

Protein-biotin interactions

The three-dimensional structures of several biotin-binding proteins are now known, giving insights into the molecular architecture of the binding sites for biotin. In combination with biochemical and computational approaches, these structural insights provide the basis for our present understanding of biotin—protein interactions which, in some cases, give rise to spectacular binding constants.     

“Protein aggregates” contain RNA and DNA,entrapped by misfolded proteins but largely rescued by slowing translational elongation

All neurodegenerative diseases feature aggregates, which usually contain disease‐specific diagnostic proteins; non‐protein constituents, however, have rarely been explored. Aggregates from SY5Y‐APP_Sw neuroblastoma, a cell model of familial Alzheimer''s disease, were crosslinked and sequences of linked peptides identified. We constructed a normalized “contactome” comprising 11 subnetworks, centered on 24 high‐connectivity hubs. Remarkably, all 24 are nucleic acid‐binding proteins. This led us to isolate and sequence RNA and DNA from Alzheimer''s and control aggregates. RNA fragments were mapped to the human genome by RNA‐seq and DNA by ChIP‐seq. Nearly all aggregate RNA sequences mapped to specific genes, whereas DNA fragments were predominantly intergenic. These nucleic acid mappings are all significantly nonrandom, making an artifactual origin extremely unlikely. RNA (mostly cytoplasmic) exceeded DNA (chiefly nuclear) by twofold to fivefold. RNA fragments recovered from AD tissue were ~1.5‐to 2.5‐fold more abundant than those recovered from control tissue, similar to the increase in protein. Aggregate abundances of specific RNA sequences were strikingly differential between cultured SY5Y‐APP_Sw glioblastoma cells expressing APOE3 vs. APOE4, consistent with APOE4 competition for E‐box/CLEAR motifs. We identified many G‐quadruplex and viral sequences within RNA and DNA of aggregates, suggesting that sequestration of viral genomes may have driven the evolution of disordered nucleic acid‐binding proteins. After RNA‐interference knockdown of the translational‐procession factor EEF2 to suppress translation in SY5Y‐APP_Sw cells, the RNA content of aggregates declined by >90%, while reducing protein content by only 30% and altering DNA content by ≤10%. This implies that cotranslational misfolding of nascent proteins may ensnare polysomes into aggregates, accounting for most of their RNA content.     

Drosophila Protein interaction Map (DPiM): A paradigm for metazoan protein complex interactions

Proteins perform essential cellular functions as part of protein complexes, often in conjunction with RNA, DNA, metabolites and other small molecules. The genome encodes thousands of proteins but not all of them are expressed in every cell type; and expressed proteins are not active at all times. Such diversity of protein expression and function accounts for the level of biological intricacy seen in nature. Defining protein-protein interactions in protein complexes, and establishing the when, what and where of potential interactions, is therefore crucial to understanding the cellular function of any protein—especially those that have not been well studied by traditional molecular genetic approaches. We generated a large-scale resource of affinity-tagged expression-ready clones and used co-affinity purification combined with tandem mass-spectrometry to identify protein partners of nearly 5,000 Drosophila melanogaster proteins. The resulting protein complex “map” provided a blueprint of metazoan protein complex organization. Here we describe how the map has provided valuable insights into protein function in addition to generating hundreds of testable hypotheses. We also discuss recent technological advancements that will be critical in addressing the next generation of questions arising from the map.