Preferential synthesis of actin during early development of the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum

The changes in protein synthesis during differentiation of the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium were studied by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Total cell protein was analyzed following a 2-hr pulse-label. It was found that during the preaggregation stage, comprising the first third of the developmental cycle, a single major band accounts for more than 20% of the total labeled protein on the gel. This species was produced in at least 5–10-fold lower amounts, relative to total cell protein synthesis, in vegetative cells and in later developing stages. Actin was purified from vegetative cells and was found to correspond to the major band in several respects. The discovery of a single protein being synthesized in such quantity at a specific developmental stage provides a powerful tool for the isolation of a specific messenger RNA molecule and for an intensive study of all the factors involved in regulating protein synthesis in a eukaryotic organism.     

Spatial complexity and control of a bacterial cell cycle

A major breakthrough in understanding the bacterial cell cycle is the discovery that bacteria exhibit a high degree of intracellular organization. Chromosomal loci and many protein complexes are positioned at particular subcellular sites. In this review, we examine recently discovered control mechanisms that make use of dynamically localized protein complexes to orchestrate the Caulobacter crescentus cell cycle. Protein localization, notably of signal transduction proteins, chromosome partition proteins, and proteases, serves to coordinate cell division with chromosome replication and cell differentiation. The developmental fate of daughter cells is decided before completion of cytokinesis, via the early establishment of cell polarity by the distribution of activated signaling proteins, bacterial cytoskeleton, and landmark proteins.     

Geminin Coordinates Cell Cycle and Developmental Control

Growth and differentiation are two major themes in embryonic development. Numerous cell divisions have to be regulated on the path from a unicellular embryo, the zygote, to the multicellular structures of a mature being. Numerous functions, specializations and cellular identities have to be generated, in order to form a complex and mature animal. Numerous mechanisms have to control the correct assignment and acquisition of cellular fates, as well as the right timing and allocation of cells. Therefore, a strict coordination has to occur between embryonic patterning and the cell cycle. From this point of view, dual roles or mutual interactions of typical proliferation and developmental control genes are likely. Recently, new light was shed on these issues by identifying the nuclear protein Geminin as a molecular coordinator between the cell cycle and axial patterning. We summarize the role of Geminin in cell cycle, in the embryonic patterning controlled by Hox genes, providing insights into cell cycle regulators in embryonic development, and, conversely, typical developmental control genes in cell cycle regulation.     

Interactions between the developmental program and cell cycle regulation of Aspergillus nidulans

Aspergillus nidulans is a multicellular fungus being used to study developmental regulation and cell cycle regulation. Genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying both processes have been characterized. Two types of observations suggest that there is significant interaction between cell cycle and developmental regulatory mechanisms. First, A. nidulans development involves the formation of specialized cell types that contain different, but specific, numbers of nuclei that are differentially regulated for cell cycle progression. Second, mutations directly affecting nuclear division can have major affects on cell differentiation during development. In this essay we describe these interactions and point out potential mechanisms for the cross talk between morphogenesis and the cell cycle that are tractable for future experimental investigation.     

DRP1-dependent mitochondrial fission initiates follicle cell differentiation during Drosophila oogenesis

Exit from the cell cycle is essential for cells to initiate a terminal differentiation program during development, but what controls this transition is incompletely understood. In this paper, we demonstrate a regulatory link between mitochondrial fission activity and cell cycle exit in follicle cell layer development during Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis. Posterior-localized clonal cells in the follicle cell layer of developing ovarioles with down-regulated expression of the major mitochondrial fission protein DRP1 had mitochondrial elements extensively fused instead of being dispersed. These cells did not exit the cell cycle. Instead, they excessively proliferated, failed to activate Notch for differentiation, and exhibited downstream developmental defects. Reintroduction of mitochondrial fission activity or inhibition of the mitochondrial fusion protein Marf-1 in posterior-localized DRP1-null clones reversed the block in Notch-dependent differentiation. When DRP1-driven mitochondrial fission activity was unopposed by fusion activity in Marf-1-depleted clones, premature cell differentiation of follicle cells occurred in mitotic stages. Thus, DRP1-dependent mitochondrial fission activity is a novel regulator of the onset of follicle cell differentiation during Drosophila oogenesis.     

Starvation promotes Dictyostelium development by relieving PufA inhibition of PKA translation through the YakA kinase pathway.

When nutrients are depleted, Dictyostelium cells undergo cell cycle arrest and initiate a developmental program that ensures survival. The YakA protein kinase governs this transition by regulating the cell cycle, repressing growth-phase genes and inducing developmental genes. YakA mutants have a shortened cell cycle and do not initiate development. A suppressor of yakA that reverses most of the developmental defects of yakA- cells, but none of their growth defects was identified. The inactivated gene, pufA, encodes a member of the Puf protein family of translational regulators. Upon starvation, pufA- cells develop precociously and overexpress developmentally important proteins, including the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase, PKA-C. Gel mobility-shift assays using a 200-base segment of PKA-C's mRNA as a probe reveals a complex with wild-type cell extracts, but not with pufA- cell extracts, suggesting the presence of a potential PufA recognition element in the PKA-C mRNA. PKA-C protein levels are low at the times of development when this complex is detectable, whereas when the complex is undetectable PKA-C levels are high. There is also an inverse relationship between PufA and PKA-C protein levels at all times of development in every mutant tested. Furthermore, expression of the putative PufA recognition elements in wild-type cells causes precocious aggregation and PKA-C overexpression, phenocopying a pufA mutation. Finally, YakA function is required for the decline of PufA protein and mRNA levels in the first 4 hours of development. We propose that PufA is a translational regulator that directly controls PKA-C synthesis and that YakA regulates the initiation of development by inhibiting the expression of PufA. Our work also suggests that Puf protein translational regulation evolved prior to the radiation of metazoan species.     

Evidence for an intraclonal random shift between two types of cell cycle times in an embryonal carcinoma cell line

In a recent paper we reported the discovery of an intraclonal bimodal-like cell cycle time variation within the multipotent embryonal carcinoma (EC) PCC3 N/1 line growing in the exponential phase in the undifferentiated state. The variability was found to be localized in the G1 period. Furthermore, an inverse relation between cell size and cell generation time was found in the cell system analysed. It was suggested that the bimodal-like intraclonal time variability previously reported was attributable to an intraclonal shift between two types of cell-growth-rate cycles and that the cell-growth cycle has a supramitotic character, being dissociated from the DNA-division cycle. The growth rate heterogeneity in the cell population was found to need three cell cycles to reach full dispersion in time. This was assumed to be due to a decreased inheritance from sister cell pairs to second cousin cell pairs. Thus, the interesting feature is that in one and the same multipotent cell line there was evidence for an intraclonal instability with a random shift between two types of cell cycle differing in the duration of their G1 period.     

Phasing in on the cell cycle

Just like all matter, proteins can also switch between gas, liquid and solid phases. Protein phase transition has claimed the spotlight in recent years as a novel way of how cells compartmentalize and regulate biochemical reactions. Moreover, this discovery has provided a new framework for the study of membrane-less organelle biogenesis and protein aggregation in neurodegenerative disorders. We now argue that this framework could be useful in the study of cell cycle regulation and cancer. Based on our work on phase transitions of arginine-rich proteins in neurodegeneration, via combining mass spectroscopy with bioinformatics analyses, we found that also numerous proteins involved in the regulation of the cell cycle can undergo protein phase separation. Indeed, several proteins whose function affects the cell cycle or are associated with cancer, have been recently found to phase separate from the test tube to cells. Investigating the role of this process for cell cycle proteins and understanding its molecular underpinnings will provide pivotal insights into the biology of cell cycle progression and cancer.     

Developmental decisions

The small nematode C. elegans is characterized by developing through a highly coordinated, reproducible cell lineage that serves as the basis of many studies focusing on the development of multi-lineage organisms. Indeed, the reproducible cell lineage enables discovery of developmental defects that occur in even a single cell. Only recently has attention been focused on how these animals modify their genetically programmed cell lineages to adapt to altered environments. Here, we summarize the current understanding of how C. elegans responds to food deprivation by adapting their developmental program in order to conserve energy. In particular, we highlight the AMPK-mediated and insulin-like growth factor signaling pathways that are the principal regulators of induced cell cycle quiescence.     

Developmental decisions: Balancing genetics and the environment by C. elegans

The small nematode C. elegans is characterized by developing through a highly coordinated, reproducible cell lineage that serves as the basis of many studies focusing on the development of multi-lineage organisms. Indeed, the reproducible cell lineage enables discovery of developmental defects that occur in even a single cell. Only recently has attention been focused on how these animals modify their genetically programmed cell lineages to adapt to altered environments. Here, we summarize the current understanding of how C. elegans responds to food deprivation by adapting their developmental program in order to conserve energy. In particular, we highlight the AMPK-mediated and insulin-like growth factor signaling pathways that are the principal regulators of induced cell cycle quiescence.     

Dominant negative mutants of the Cdc2 kinase uncouple cell division from iterative plant development.

Because plant cells do not move and are surrounded by a rigid cell wall, cell division rates and patterns are believed to be directly responsible for generating new structures throughout development. To study the relationship between cell division and morphogenesis, transgenic tobacco and Arabidopsis plants were constructed expressing dominant mutations in a key regulator of the Arabidopsis cell cycle, the Cdc2a kinase. Plants constitutively overproducing the wild-type Cdc2a or the mutant form predicted to accelerate the cell cycle did not exhibit a significantly altered development. In contrast, a mutation expected to arrest the cell cycle abolished cell division when expressed in Arabidopsis, whereas some tobacco plants constitutively producing this mutant protein were recovered. These plants had a reduced histone H1 kinase activity and contained considerably fewer cells. These cells were, however, much larger and underwent normal differentiation. Morphogenesis, histogenesis and developmental timing were unaffected. The results indicate that, in plants, the developmental controls defining shape can act independently from cell division rates.     

Nobel Lecture. Protein synthesis,proteolysis, and cell cycle transitions

The discovery of the role(s) of protein synthesis and degradation in the operation of the cell cycle is described.     

Deciphering the BRCA1 Tumor Suppressor Network

The BRCA1 tumor suppressor protein is a central constituent of several distinct macromolecular protein complexes that execute homology-directed DNA damage repair and cell cycle checkpoints. Recent years have borne witness to an exciting phase of discovery at the basic molecular level for how this network of DNA repair proteins acts to maintain genome stability and suppress cancer. The clinical dividends of this investment are now being realized with the approval of first-in-class BRCA-targeted therapies for ovarian cancer and identification of molecular events that determine responsiveness to these agents. Further delineation of the basic science underlying BRCA network function holds promise to maximally exploit genome instability for hereditary and sporadic cancer therapy.     

Regulation of protein synthesis at the elongation stage. New insights into the control of gene expression in eukaryotes.

There are many reports which demonstrate that the rate of protein biosynthesis at the elongation stage is actively regulated in eukaryotic cells. Possible physiological roles for this type of regulation are: the coordination of translation of mRNA with different initiation rate constants; regulation of transition between different physiological states of a cell, such as transition between stages of the cell cycle; and in general, any situation where the maintenance of a particular physiological state is dependent on continuous protein synthesis. A number of covalent modifications of elongation factors offer potential mechanisms for such regulation. Among the various modifications of elongation factors, phosphorylation of eEF-2 by the specific Ca2+calmodulin-dependent eEF-2 kinase is the best studied and perhaps the most important mechanism of regulation of elongation rate. Since this phosphorylation is strictly Ca(2+)-dependent, and makes eEF-2 inactive in translation, this mechanism could explain how changes in the intracellular free Ca2+ concentration may regulate elongation rate. We also discuss some recent findings concerning elongation factors, such as the discovery of developmental stage-specific elongation factors and the regulated binding of eEF-1 alpha to cytoskeletal elements. Together, these observations underline the importance of the elongation stage of translation in the regulation of the cellular processes essential for normal cell life.     

The Cell Cycle

I review recent advances in our knowledge of the eucaryoticcell cycle: the set of processes by which cells grow and divide.Genetic approaches to the cell cycle of somatic cells identifieda pathway of events where the initiation of each event was dependenton the successful completion of the preceding event, as wellas a single key gene, cdc2, that is required both at the beginningand at the end of the cell cycle. The alternative approach ofstudying the cell cycle biochemically in early embryos providedevidence for a cytoplasmic oscillator which alternated betweenmitosis-inducing and interphase-inducing states and identifiedthe mitosis-inducing component as maturation promoting factor(MPF). These two very different views of the cell cycle initiallyseemed irreconcilable. However, a link between the somatic andembryonic cell cycles was provided by the recent discovery thatthe cdc2 protein is one of the components of MPF. In the embryoniccell cycle the activation of MPF and induction of mitosis istriggered by the accumulation of a protein named cyclin whichbecomes a component of MPF. Somehow, MPF induces the proteolyticdegradation of cyclin, which inturn allows MPF to be inactivatedand allows the cell cycle to pass from mitosis into interphase.The more complex cell cycle of somatic cells is probably derivedfrom the embryonic cyclin-based oscillator by imposing a systemof checks and balances on the accumulation and destruction ofcyclin. I also present some thoughts on the relationships between scienceand society, and comment on the way in which scientists describetheir work to the lay world.