Dmrt1 polymorphism and sex‐chromosome differentiation in Rana temporaria

Sex‐determination mechanisms vary both within and among populations of common frogs, opening opportunities to investigate the molecular pathways and ultimate causes shaping their evolution. We investigated the association between sex‐chromosome differentiation (as assayed from microsatellites) and polymorphism at the candidate sex‐determining gene Dmrt1 in two Alpine populations. Both populations harboured a diversity of X‐linked and Y‐linked Dmrt1 haplotypes. Some males had fixed male‐specific alleles at all markers (“differentiated” Y chromosomes), others only at Dmrt1 (“proto‐” Y chromosomes), while still others were genetically indistinguishable from females (undifferentiated X chromosomes). Besides these XX males, we also found rare XY females. The several Dmrt1 Y haplotypes differed in the probability of association with a differentiated Y chromosome, which we interpret as a result of differences in the masculinizing effects of alleles at the sex‐determining locus. From our results, the polymorphism in sex‐chromosome differentiation and its association with Dmrt1, previously inferred from Swedish populations, are not just idiosyncratic features of peripheral populations, but also characterize highly diverged populations in the central range. This implies that an apparently unstable pattern has been maintained over long evolutionary times.     

No evidence that Y‐chromosome differentiation affects male fitness in a Swiss population of common frogs

The canonical model of sex‐chromosome evolution assigns a key role to sexually antagonistic (SA) genes on the arrest of recombination and ensuing degeneration of Y chromosomes. This assumption cannot be tested in organisms with highly differentiated sex chromosomes, such as mammals or birds, owing to the lack of polymorphism. Fixation of SA alleles, furthermore, might be the consequence rather than the cause of recombination arrest. Here we focus on a population of common frogs (Rana temporaria) where XY males with genetically differentiated Y chromosomes (nonrecombinant Y haplotypes) coexist with both XY° males with proto‐Y chromosomes (only differentiated from X chromosomes in the immediate vicinity of the candidate sex‐determining locus Dmrt1) and XX males with undifferentiated sex chromosomes (genetically identical to XX females). Our study finds no effect of sex‐chromosome differentiation on male phenotype, mating success or fathering success. Our conclusions rejoin genomic studies that found no differences in gene expression between XY, XY° and XX males. Sexual dimorphism in common frogs might result more from the differential expression of autosomal genes than from sex‐linked SA genes. Among‐male variance in sex‐chromosome differentiation seems better explained by a polymorphism in the penetrance of alleles at the sex locus, resulting in variable levels of sex reversal (and thus of X‐Y recombination in XY females), independent of sex‐linked SA genes.     

Geographic variation in sex‐chromosome differentiation in the common frog (Rana temporaria)

In sharp contrast with birds and mammals, sex‐determination systems in ectothermic vertebrates are often highly dynamic and sometimes multifactorial. Both environmental and genetic effects have been documented in common frogs (Rana temporaria). One genetic linkage group, mapping to the largest pair of chromosomes and harbouring the candidate sex‐determining gene Dmrt1, associates with sex in several populations throughout Europe, but association varies both within and among populations. Here, we show that sex association at this linkage group differs among populations along a 1500‐km transect across Sweden. Genetic differentiation between sexes is strongest (F_ST = 0.152) in a northern‐boreal population, where male‐specific alleles and heterozygote excesses (F_IS = ?0.418 in males, +0.025 in females) testify to a male‐heterogametic system and lack of X‐Y recombination. In the southernmost population (nemoral climate), in contrast, sexes share the same alleles at the same frequencies (F_ST = 0.007 between sexes), suggesting unrestricted recombination. Other populations show intermediate levels of sex differentiation, with males falling in two categories: some cluster with females, while others display male‐specific Y haplotypes. This polymorphism may result from differences between populations in the patterns of X‐Y recombination, co‐option of an alternative sex‐chromosome pair, or a mixed sex‐determination system where maleness is controlled either by genes or by environment depending on populations or families. We propose approaches to test among these alternative models, to disentangle the effects of climate and phylogeography on the latitudinal trend, and to sort out how this polymorphism relates to the ‘sexual races’ described in common frogs in the 1930s.     

Dmrt1 polymorphism covaries with sex‐determination patterns in Rana temporaria

Patterns of sex‐chromosome differentiation and gonadal development have been shown to vary among populations of Rana temporaria along a latitudinal transect in Sweden. Frogs from the northern‐boreal population of Ammarnäs displayed well‐differentiated X and Y haplotypes, early gonadal differentiation, and a perfect match between phenotypic and genotypic sex. In contrast, no differentiated Y haplotypes could be detected in the southern population of Tvedöra, where juveniles furthermore showed delayed gonadal differentiation. Here, we show that Dmrt1, a gene that plays a key role in sex determination and sexual development across all metazoans, displays significant sex differentiation in Tvedöra, with a Y‐specific haplotype distinct from Ammarnäs. The differential segment is not only much shorter in Tvedöra than in Ammarnäs, it is also less differentiated and associates with both delayed gonadal differentiation and imperfect match between phenotypic and genotypic sex. Whereas Tvedöra juveniles with a local Y haplotype tend to ultimately develop as males, those without it may nevertheless become functional XX males, but with strongly female‐biased progeny. Our findings suggest that the variance in patterns of sex determination documented in common frogs might result from a genetic polymorphism within a small genomic region that contains Dmrt1. They also substantiate the view that recurrent convergences of sex determination toward a limited set of chromosome pairs may result from the co‐option of small genomic regions that harbor key genes from the sex‐determination pathway.     

The mechanism of sex determination in Rumex acetosella

Summary Cytogenetic studies were made with particular emphasis on the sex-determining mechanism in Rumex acetosella (6 x = 42) and its hybrids (F ₁, F ₂, BC ₁ and BC ₂) with R. hastatulus (synthetic 4 x = 16 = 4 A +4 X = and 4 x = 18 = 4 A + 2 (X Y ₁ Y ₂) = ). Rumex acetosella was almost strictly dioecious with 5050 male and female. Breeding tests revealed that the males were heterogametic. The longest chromosomes (S), usually two, are the sex chromosomes of this hexaploid species. The S chromosomes are homomorphic in both male and female. The sex chromosome: autosome ratios, and the strong epistatic male effect of the S ^M chromosome in the polyploid dioecious species and in the hybrids, are evidence of an X/Y Melandrium type sex-determining mechanism controlled by a single pair of homomorphic sex chromosomes. Thus, the sex chromosome formula of the males was S ^F S ^M and that of females was S ^F S ^F. The present approach is a new method for resolving the sex-determining mechanism in a dioecious species.     

High‐density linkage maps fail to detect any genetic component to sex determination in a Rana temporaria family

Sex chromosome differentiation in Rana temporaria varies strikingly among populations or families: whereas some males display well‐differentiated Y haplotypes at microsatellite markers on linkage group 2 (LG₂), others are genetically undistinguishable from females. We analysed with RADseq markers one family from a Swiss lowland population with no differentiated sex chromosomes, and where sibship analyses had failed to detect any association between the phenotypic sex of progeny and parental haplotypes. Offspring were reared in a common tank in outdoor conditions and sexed at the froglet stage. We could map a total of 2177 SNPs (1123 in the mother, 1054 in the father), recovering in both adults 13 linkage groups (= chromosome pairs) that were strongly syntenic to Xenopus tropicalis despite > 200 My divergence. Sexes differed strikingly in the localization of crossovers, which were uniformly distributed in the female but limited to chromosome ends in the male. None of the 2177 markers showed significant association with offspring sex. Considering the very high power of our analysis, we conclude that sex determination was not genetic in this family; which factors determined sex remain to be investigated.     

Within‐population polymorphism of sex‐determination systems in the common frog (Rana temporaria)

In sharp contrast with birds and mammals, the sex chromosomes of ectothermic vertebrates are often undifferentiated, for reasons that remain debated. A linkage map was recently published for Rana temporaria (Linnaeus, 1758) from Fennoscandia (Eastern European lineage), with a proposed sex‐determining role for linkage group 2 (LG2). We analysed linkage patterns in lowland and highland populations from Switzerland (Western European lineage), with special focus on LG2. Sibship analyses showed large differences from the Fennoscandian map in terms of recombination rates and loci order, pointing to large‐scale inversions or translocations. All linkage groups displayed extreme heterochiasmy (total map length was 12.2 cM in males, versus 869.8 cM in females). Sex determination was polymorphic within populations: a majority of families (with equal sex ratios) showed a strong correlation between offspring phenotypic sex and LG2 paternal haplotypes, whereas other families (some of which with female‐biased sex ratios) did not show any correlation. The factors determining sex in the latter could not be identified. This coexistence of several sex‐determination systems should induce frequent recombination of X and Y haplotypes, even in the absence of male recombination. Accordingly, we found no sex differences in allelic frequencies on LG2 markers among wild‐caught male and female adults, except in one high‐altitude population, where nonrecombinant Y haplotypes suggest sex to be entirely determined by LG2. Multifactorial sex determination certainly contributes to the lack of sex‐chromosome differentiation in amphibians.     

Molecular evolution of Dmrt1 accompanies change of sex-determining mechanisms in reptilia

In reptiles, sex-determining mechanisms have evolved repeatedly and reversibly between genotypic and temperature-dependent sex determination. The gene Dmrt1 directs male determination in chicken (and presumably other birds), and regulates sex differentiation in animals as distantly related as fruit flies, nematodes and humans. Here, we show a consistent molecular difference in Dmrt1 between reptiles with genotypic and temperature-dependent sex determination. Among 34 non-avian reptiles, a convergently evolved pair of amino acids encoded by sequence within exon 2 near the DM-binding domain of Dmrt1 distinguishes species with either type of sex determination. We suggest that this amino acid shift accompanied the evolution of genotypic sex determination from an ancestral condition of temperature-dependent sex determination at least three times among reptiles, as evident in turtles, birds and squamates. This novel hypothesis describes the evolution of sex-determining mechanisms as turnover events accompanied by one or two small mutations.     

Sex-chromosome differentiation and ‘sex races’ in the common frog (Rana temporaria)

Sex-chromosome differentiation was recently shown to vary among common frog populations in Fennoscandia, suggesting a trend of increased differentiation with latitude. By rearing families from two contrasted populations (respectively, from northern and southern Sweden), we show this disparity to stem from differences in sex-determination mechanisms rather than in XY-recombination patterns. Offspring from the northern population display equal sex ratios at metamorphosis, with phenotypic sexes that correlate strongly with paternal LG₂ haplotypes (the sex chromosome); accordingly, Y haplotypes are markedly differentiated, with male-specific alleles and depressed diversity testifying to their smaller effective population size. In the southern population, by contrast, a majority of juveniles present ovaries at metamorphosis; only later in development do sex ratios return to equilibrium. Even at these later stages, phenotypic sexes correlate only mildly with paternal LG₂ haplotypes; accordingly, there are no recognizable Y haplotypes. These distinct patterns of gonadal development fit the concept of ‘sex races’ proposed in the 1930s, with our two populations assigned to the ‘differentiated’ and ‘semi-differentiated’ races, respectively. Our results support the suggestion that ‘sex races’ differ in the genetic versus epigenetic components of sex determination. Analysing populations from the ‘undifferentiated race’ with high-density genetic maps should help to further test this hypothesis.     

Variability of genetic sex determination in poeciliid fishes

Poeciliids are one of the best-studied groups of fishes with respect to sex determination. They present an amazing variety of mechanisms, which span from simple XX-XY or ZZ-ZW systems to polyfactorial sex determination. The gonosomes of poeciliids generally are homomorphic, but very early stages of sex chromosome differentiation have been occasionally detected in some species. In the platyfish Xiphophorus maculatus, gene loci involved in melanoma formation, in different pigmentation patterns and in sexual maturity are closely linked to the sex-determining locus in the subtelomeric region of the X- and Y- chromosomes. The majority of traits encoded by these loci are highly polymorphic. This phenomenon might be explained by the high level of genomic plasticity apparently affecting the sex-determining region, where frequent rearrangements such as duplications, deletions, amplifications, and transpositions frequently occur. We propose that the high plasticity of the sex-determining region might explain the variability of sex determination in Xiphophorus and otherbreak poeciliids.     

B Chromosome Polymorphism in the Fish, Astyanax scabripinnis

Four populations of Astyanax scabripinnis (Pisces, Characidae) were analyzed for B chromosome features. This species contains a metacentric macrochromosome (B_M), similar in size to the first chromosome of the karyotype, besides two variant forms, a large submetacentric (B_SM) and a small metacentric (B_m), both showing a reduced frequency. These variant forms were observed only in the populations from the Campos do Jordão region (São Paulo State, Brazil), although not present in all the populations sampled. The three B chromosome forms are heterochromatic and at least the B_M and B_SM are also GC-rich, as evidenced by C-banding and chromomycin A₃ staining. In spite of the morphological similarity between the B_M form and the first chromosome pair, they differ in the G-banding pattern, which does not favor a possible relationship among these chromosomes. FISH with a telomeric DNA probe evidenced signals on the terminal region of all chromosomes, including the Bs. Interstitial telomeric bands, indicative of some chromosomal rearrangements such as translocation or tandem fusion in the origin of the B chromosomes, were not observed. B_SM and B_m are probable derivative B chromosome forms from an ancestral B_M chromosome, showing a restricted occurrence and low frequency in the populations.     

Sex‐chromosome differentiation parallels postglacial range expansion in European tree frogs (Hyla arborea)

Occasional XY recombination is a proposed explanation for the sex‐chromosome homomorphy in European tree frogs. Numerous laboratory crosses, however, failed to detect any event of male recombination, and a detailed survey of NW‐European Hyla arborea populations identified male‐specific alleles at sex‐linked loci, pointing to the absence of XY recombination in their recent history. Here, we address this paradox in a phylogeographic framework by genotyping sex‐linked microsatellite markers in populations and sibships from the entire species range. Contrasting with postglacial populations of NW Europe, which display complete absence of XY recombination and strong sex‐chromosome differentiation, refugial populations of the southern Balkans and Adriatic coast show limited XY recombination and large overlaps in allele frequencies. Geographically and historically intermediate populations of the Pannonian Basin show intermediate patterns of XY differentiation. Even in populations where X and Y occasionally recombine, the genetic diversity of Y haplotypes is reduced below the levels expected from the fourfold drop in copy numbers. This study is the first in which X and Y haplotypes could be phased over the distribution range in a species with homomorphic sex chromosomes; it shows that XY‐recombination patterns may differ strikingly between conspecific populations, and that recombination arrest may evolve rapidly (<5000 generations).     

New Y chromosomes and early stages of sex chromosome differentiation: sex determination in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Megaselia</Emphasis>

The phorid fly Megaselia scalaris is a laboratory model for the turnover and early differentiation of sex chromosomes. Isolates from the field have an XY sex-determining mechanism with chromosome pair 2 acting as X and Y chromosomes. The sex chromosomes are homomorphic but display early signs of sex chromosome differentiation: a low level of molecular differences between X and Y. The male-determining function (M), maps to the distal part of the Y chromosome’s short arm. In laboratory cultures, new Y chromosomes with no signs of a molecular differentiation arise at a low rate, probably by transposition of M to these chromosomes. Downstream of the primary signal, the homologue of the Drosophila doublesex (dsx) is part of the sex-determining pathway while Sex-lethal (Sxl), though structurally conserved, is not.     

The expression pattern of a mouse doublesex-related gene is consistent with a role in gonadal differentiation

The signal for somatic sex determination in mammals, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster is chromosomal, but the overall mechanisms do not appear to be conserved between the phyla. However it has been found quite recently that the C. elegans sex-determining gene Mab-3 contains a domain highly homologous to the Drosophila sex-determining gene doublesex (dsx) and shares a similar role. These data suggest that at least some aspects of the regulation of sex determination might be conserved. In humans, a doublesex-related gene (DMRT1) was identified at less than 30 kb from the critical region for sex reversal on chromosome 9p24 (TD9). In order to get insights into the role of DMRT1 in sex determination/differentiation, we have isolated DMRT1 mouse homologue (Dmrt1) and analysed its expression pattern. The gene is expressed in the genital ridges of both sexes during the sex-determining switch and it shows male/female dimorphism at late stages of sex differentiation.     

THE CONTRIBUTION OF FEMALE MEIOTIC DRIVE TO THE EVOLUTION OF NEO‐SEX CHROMOSOMES

Sex chromosomes undergo rapid turnover in certain taxonomic groups. One of the mechanisms of sex chromosome turnover involves fusions between sex chromosomes and autosomes. Sexual antagonism, heterozygote advantage, and genetic drift have been proposed as the drivers for the fixation of this evolutionary event. However, all empirical patterns of the prevalence of multiple sex chromosome systems across different taxa cannot be simply explained by these three mechanisms. In this study, we propose that female meiotic drive may contribute to the evolution of neo‐sex chromosomes. The results of this study showed that in mammals, the XY₁Y₂ sex chromosome system is more prevalent in species with karyotypes of more biarmed chromosomes, whereas the X₁X₂Y sex chromosome system is more prevalent in species with predominantly acrocentric chromosomes. In species where biarmed chromosomes are favored by female meiotic drive, X‐autosome fusions (XY₁Y₂ sex chromosome system) will be also favored by female meiotic drive. In contrast, in species with more acrocentric chromosomes, Y‐autosome fusions (X₁X₂Y sex chromosome system) will be favored just because of the biased mutation rate toward chromosomal fusions. Further consideration should be given to female meiotic drive as a mechanism in the fixation of neo‐sex chromosomes.     

Accumulation of Y-specific satellite DNAs during the evolution of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Rumex acetosa</Emphasis> sex chromosomes

The study of the molecular structure of young heteromorphic sex chromosomes of plants has shed light on the evolutionary forces that control the differentiation of the X and Y during the earlier stages of their evolution. We have used the model plant Rumex acetosa, a dioecious species with multiple sex chromosomes, 2n = 12 + XX female and 2n = 12 + XY₁Y₂ male, to analyse the significance of repetitive DNA accumulation during the differentiation of the Y. A bulk segregant analysis (BSA) approach allowed us to identify and isolate random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers linked to the sex chromosomes. From a total of 86 RAPD markers in the parents, 6 markers were found to be linked to the Ys and 1 to the X. Two of the Y-linked markers represent two AT-rich satellite DNAs (satDNAs), named RAYSII and RAYSIII, that share about 80% homology, as well as with RAYSI, another satDNA of R. acetosa. Fluorescent in situ hybridisation demonstrated that RAYSII is specific for Y₁, whilst RAYSIII is located in different clusters along Y₁ and Y₂. The two satDNAs were only detected in the genome of the dioecious species with XX/XY₁Y₂ multiple sex chromosome systems in the subgenus Acetosa, but were absent from other dioecious species with an XX/XY system of the subgenera Acetosa or Acetosella, as well as in gynodioecious or hermaphrodite species of the subgenera Acetosa, Rumex and Platypodium. Phylogenetic analysis with different cloned monomers of RAYSII and RAYSIII from both R. acetosa and R. papillaris indicate that these two satDNAs are completely separated from each other, and from RAYSI, in both species. The three Y-specific satDNAs, however, evolved from an ancestral satDNA with repeating units of 120 bp, through intermediate satDNAs of 360 bp. The data therefore support the idea that Y-chromosome differentiation and heterochromatinisation in the Rumex species having a multiple sex chromosome system have occurred by different amplification events from a common ancestral satDNA. Since dioecious species with multiple XX/XY₁Y₂ sex chromosome systems of the section Acetosa appear to have evolved from dioecious species with an XX/XY system, the amplification of tandemly repetitive elements in the Ys of the section Acetosa is a recent evolutionary process that has contributed to an increase in the size and differentiation of the already non-recombining Y chromosomes.     

On the sex chromosome trivalent in some Lepidoptera females

In four of the moth species investigated, viz. Witlesia murana, Scoparia arundinata (Pyraloidea), Bactra furfurana and B. lacteana (Tortricoidea) the metaphase plates of the first meiotic division of their oocytes show a trivalent in addition to the normal bivalents. It evidently has its rise in a transverse break in one of the conjugated chromosomes. Two sex chromatin bodies can be seen in the female somatic cells of three of these species, whereas other species with a normal XY bivalent have only one. These two sex chromatin bodies are unequal in size, and their sizes bear approximately the same relation to each other as do those of the two smaller chromosomes of the trivalent. The broken chromosome is evidently the Y chromosome. The sex chromosome designation for the four above-mentioned species is thus XY₁Y₂ for the females and XX for the males. The sex chromosomes of the four species are among the biggest of the respective complements. This supports the view that the big chromosome to be found in several Lepidoptera species is the sex chromosome. It seems that in animals with holokinetic chromosomes an excessive fragmentation is hindered, at least in the case of the sex chromosomes, by its deleterious effect on the balance of sex-determining genes.Dedicated to Doctor Sally Hughes-Schrader on the occasion of her seventy-fifth birthday.     

Tracking the evolutionary pathway of sex chromosomes among fishes: characterizing the unique XX/XY<Subscript>1</Subscript>Y<Subscript>2</Subscript> system in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Hoplias malabaricus</Emphasis> (Teleostei,Characiformes)

The Neotropical fish, Hoplias malabaricus, is one of the most cytogenetically studied fish taxon with seven distinct karyomorphs (A–G) comprising varying degrees of sex chromosome differentiation, ranging from homomorphic to highly differentiated simple and multiple sex chromosomes. Therefore, this fish offers a unique opportunity to track evolutionary mechanisms standing behind the sex chromosome evolution and differentiation. Here, we focused on a high-resolution cytogenetic characterization of the unique XX/XY₁Y₂ multiple sex chromosome system found in one of its karyomorphs (G). For this, we applied a suite of conventional (Giemsa-staining, C-banding) and molecular cytogenetic approaches, including fluorescence in situ hybridization FISH (with 5S and 18S rDNAs, 10 microsatellite motifs and telomeric (TTAGGG) _n sequences as probes), comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), and whole chromosome painting (WCP). In addition, we performed comparative analyses with other Erythrinidae species to discover the evolutionary origin of this unique karyomorph G-specific XY₁Y₂ multiple sex chromosome system. WCP experiments confirmed the homology between these multiple sex chromosomes and the nascent XX/XY sex system found in the karyomorph F, but disproved a homology with those of karyomorphs A–D and other closely related species. Besides, the putative origin of such XY₁Y₂ system by rearrangements of several chromosome pairs from an ancestral karyotype was also highlighted. In addition, clear identification of a male-specific region on the Y₁ chromosome suggested a differential pattern of repetitive sequences accumulation. The present data suggested the origin of this unique XY₁Y₂ sex system, revealing evidences for the high level of plasticity of sex chromosome differentiation within the Erythrinidae.     

Evolution of ZZ/ZW and XX/XY sex-determination systems in the closely related medaka species, <Emphasis Type="Italic">Oryzias hubbsi</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">O. dancena</Emphasis>

A DM-domain gene on the Y chromosome was identified as the sex-determining gene in the medaka, Oryzias latipes, and named DMY (also known as dmrt1bY). However, this gene is absent in most Oryzias fishes, suggesting that closely related species have another sex-determining gene. In fact, it has been demonstrated that the Y chromosome in O. dancena is not homologous to that in O. latipes, whereas both species have an XX/XY sex-determination system. Through a progeny test of sex-reversed fish and a linkage analysis of isolated sex-linked DNA markers, we show that O. hubbsi, which is one of the most closely related species to O. dancena, has a ZZ/ZW system. In addition, genetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization mapping of the sex-linked markers revealed that sex chromosomes in O. hubbsi and O. dancena are not homologous, indicating different origins of these ZW and XY sex chromosomes. Furthermore, we found that O. hubbsi has morphologically heteromorphic sex chromosomes, in which the W chromosome has 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-positive heterochromatin blocks and is larger than the Z chromosome, although such differentiated sex chromosomes have not been observed in other Oryzias species. These findings suggest that a variety of sex-determining mechanisms and sex chromosomes have evolved in Oryzias.