Analysis of low-density lipoprotein catabolism by primary cultures of hepatic cells from normal and low-density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice

Low-density lipoproteins (LDL) are taken up by LDL receptor (LDLr)-dependent and -independent pathways; the role and importance of the latest being less well defined. We analyzed the importance of these pathways in the mouse by comparing LDL binding to primary cultures of hepatocytes from LDLr knockout (LDLr KO) and normal C57BL/6J mice. Saturation curve analysis shows that (125)I-LDL bind specifically to normal and LDLr KO mouse hepatocytes with similar dissociation constants (K(d)) (31.2 and 22.9 microg LDL-protein/ml, respectively). The maximal binding capacity (B(max)) is, however, reduced by 48% in LDLr KO mouse hepatocytes in comparison to normal hepatocytes. Conducting the assay in the presence of a 200-fold excess of high-density lipoprotein-3 (HDL3) reduced by 39% the binding of (125)I-LDL to normal hepatocytes and abolished the binding to the LDLr KO mouse hepatocytes. These data indicate that in normal mouse hepatocytes, the LDLr is responsible for approximately half of the LDL binding while a lipoprotein binding site (LBS), interacting with both LDL and HDL3, is responsible for the other half. It can also be deduced that both receptors/sites have a similar affinity for LDL. The metabolism of LDL-protein and cholesteryl esters (CE) was analyzed in both types of cells. (125)I-LDL-protein degradation was reduced by 95% in LDLr KO hepatocytes compared to normal hepatocytes. Comparing the association of (125)I-LDL and (3)H-CE-LDL revealed a CE-selective uptake of 35.6- and 22-fold for normal and LDLr KO mouse hepatocytes, respectively. Adding a 200-fold excess of HDL3 in the assay reduced by 71% the CE-selective uptake in LDLr KO hepatocytes and by 96% in normal hepatocytes. This indicates that mouse hepatocytes are able to selectively take up CE from LDL by the LBS. The comparison of LDL-CE association also showed that the LBS pathway provides 5-fold more LDL-CE to the cell than the LDLr. Overall, our results indicate that in mouse hepatocytes, LDLr is almost completely responsible for LDL-protein degradation while the LBS is responsible for the major part of LDL-CE entry by a CE-selective uptake pathway.     

The low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor binds and mediates catabolism of bovine milk lipoprotein lipase.

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL), the major lipolytic enzyme involved in the conversion of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to remnants, was found to compete with binding of activated alpha 2-macroglobulin (alpha 2M*) to the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP)/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor. Bovine milk LPL displaced both 125I-labeled alpha 2M* and 39-kDa alpha 2M receptor-associated protein (RAP) from the surface of cultured mutant fibroblasts lacking LDL receptors with apparent KI values at 4 degrees C of 6.8 and 30 nM, respectively. Furthermore, LPL inhibited the cellular degradation of 125I-alpha 2M* at 37 degrees C. Because both alpha 2M* and RAP interact with LRP, these data suggest that LPL binds specifically to this receptor. This was further supported by observing that an immunoaffinity-isolated polyclonal antibody against LRP blocked cellular degradation of 125I-LPL in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, 125I-LPL bound to highly purified LRP in a solid-phase assay with a KD of 18 nM, and this binding could be partially displaced with alpha 2M* (KI = 7 nM) and RAP (KI = 3 nM). Taken together, these data establish that LPL binds with high affinity to LRP and undergoes LRP-mediated cellular uptake. The implication of these findings for lipoprotein catabolism in vivo may be important if LRP binding is preserved when LPL is attached to lipoproteins. If so, LPL might facilitate LRP-mediated clearance of lipoproteins.     

The low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein contributes to selective uptake of high density lipoprotein cholesteryl esters by SW872 liposarcoma cells and primary human adipocytes

The concept that selective transfer of high density lipoprotein (HDL)-derived cholesteryl esters (CE) does not require lipoprotein internalization has been challenged recently by evidence that implicates HDL recycling during the selective uptake process. This has prompted us to examine the role of the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) in selective uptake. LRP is an endocytic receptor for lipoprotein lipase (LpL) and apolipoprotein E (apoE) ligands that are able to mediate selective uptake. We report that molecules that interfere with ligand binding to LRP, such as the receptor-associated protein (RAP), suramin, alpha(2)-macroglobulin, or lactoferrin, inhibit HDL-CE selective uptake by human primary adipocytes and SW872 liposarcoma cells by 35-50%. This partial inhibition of selective uptake from total HDL was not due to preferential inhibition of the HDL(2) or HDL(3) subfractions. Selective uptake by the scavenger receptor BI was not inhibited by RAP, excluding its involvement. Furthermore, in SW872 cells in which LRP was reduced to 14% of control levels by stable antisense expression, selective uptake was attenuated by at least 33%, confirming a role for LRP in this process. RAP, alpha(2)-macroglobulin, lactoferrin, and suramin (individually or in paired combinations) also attenuated selective uptake of HDL-CE by primary human adipocytes by about 40%. On the other hand, human skin fibroblasts express LRP abundantly but lack the capacity for selective uptake, demonstrating that other molecules are required. In SW872 cells, exogenous apoE or LpL can facilitate selective uptake but only the apoE-enhanced uptake can be inhibited by RAP, implicating apoE as a likely co-mediator. We discuss the possible mechanisms by which the endocytic receptor, LRP, can mediate selective uptake.     

Low density lipoprotein-receptor plays a major role in the binding of very low density lipoproteins and their remnants on HepG2 cells.

The binding to HepG2 cells of very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and their remnants (IDL) was alternatively, in the past, attributed to the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLr) or to an apoE-specific receptor. In order to resolve this issue, we have compared the binding of those lipoproteins labelled with iodine-125 to normal and LDLr deficient HepG2 cells. Those deficient cells were obtained by a constitutive antisense strategy and their LDLr level is 14% the level of normal HepG2 cells. By saturation curve analysis, we show that VLDL and IDL bind to high and low affinity sites on cells. The low affinity binding was eliminated by conducting the assay in presence of a 200-fold excess of HDL3 respective to the concentrations of 125I-labelled VLDL and IDL. For 125I-VLDL high affinity binding to normal HepG2 cells, we found a dissociation constant (Kd) of 21.2 +/- 3.7 micrograms prot./ml (S.E., N = 5) and a maximal binding capacity (Bmax) of 0.0312 +/- 0.0063 microgram prot./mg cell prot, while we have measured a Kd of 5.3 +/- 0.8 and a Bmax of 0.0081 +/- 0.0014 with LDLr deficient cells. This indicates that LDLr is responsible for 74% of VLDL binding to HepG2 cells and that the non-LDLr high affinity receptor has a higher affinity for VLDL than LDLr. A 53% loss of 125I-IDL binding capacity was measured with LDLr deficient cells compared with normal cells (Bmax: 0.028 +/- 0.005 versus 0.059 +/- 0.006), while no significant statistical difference was found between affinities. The study shows that the LDLr is almost the only contributor in VLDL binding, while it shares IDL binding capacity with another high affinity receptor. The physiological importance of LDLr is confirmed by an almost equivalent loss of IDL and VLDL degradation in LDLr deficient cells.     

A hepatocyte receptor for high-density lipoproteins specific for apolipoprotein A-I

Apolipoprotein (apo) E-deficient rat high-density lipoproteins (HDL) bind to isolated rat hepatocytes at 4 degrees C by a process shown to be saturable and competed for by an excess of unlabeled HDL. Uptake (binding and internalization) at 37 degrees C was also saturable and competed for by an excess of unlabeled HDL. At 37 degrees C the HDL apoprotein was degraded as evidenced by the appearance of trichloroacetic acid-soluble radioactivity in the incubation media. The binding of a constant amount of 125I-apo-E-deficient HDL was measured in the presence of increasing concentrations of various lipoproteins. HDL and dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine (DMPC) X apo-A-I complexes decreased binding by 80 and 65%, respectively. Human low-density lipoproteins, DMPC X apo-E complexes, and DMPC vesicles alone did not compete for apo-E-deficient HDL binding. However, DMPC X apo-E complexes did compete for the binding of the total HDL fraction that contained apo-E but to a lesser extent than did DMPC X apo-A-I. DMPC X 125I-apo-A-I complexes also bound to hepatocytes, and this binding was competed for by excess HDL (70%) and DMPC X apo-A-I complexes (65%), but there was no competition for binding by DMPC vesicles or DMPC X apo-E complexes. It thus appears that hepatocytes have a specific receptor for HDL and that apo-A-I is the ligand for this receptor.     

Low density lipoprotein binding, internalization, and degradation in human adipose cells.

Human adipose tissue derives its cholesterol primarily from circulating lipoproteins. To study fat cell-lipoprotein interactions, low density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake and metabolism were examined using isolated human adipocytes. The 125I-labelled LDL (d = 1.025-1.045) was bound and incorporated by human fat cells in a dose-dependent manner with an apparent Km of 6.9 + 0.9 microgram LDL protein/mL and a Vmax of 15-80 microgram LDL protein/mg lipid per 2 h. In time-course studies, LDL uptake was characterized by rapid initial binding followed by a linear accumulation for at least 4 h. The 125I-labelled LDL degradation products (trichloroacetic acid soluble iodopeptides) accumulated in the incubation medium in a progressive manner with time. Azide and F- inhibited LDL internalization and degradation, suggesting that these processes are energy dependent. Binding and cellular internalization of 125I-labelled LDL lacked lipoprotein class specificity in that excess (25-fold) unlabelled very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) (d less than 1.006) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) (d = 1.075-1.21) inhibited binding and internalization of 125I-labelled LDL. On an equivalent protein basis HDL was the most potent. The 125I-labelled LDL binding to an adipocyte plasma membrane preparation was a saturable process and almost completely abolished by a three- to four-fold greater concentration of HDL. The binding, internalization, and degradation of LDL by human adipocytes resembled that reported by other mesenchymal cells and could account for a significant proportion of in vivo LDL catabolism. It is further suggested that adipose tissue is an important site of LDL and HDL interactions.     

A saturable, high-affinity binding site for human low density lipoprotein on freshly isolated rat hepatocytes

Freshly isolated rat hepatocytes bind the solely apolipoprotein B-containing human low density lipoprotein (LDL) with a high-affinity component. After 1 h of incubation less than 30% of the cell-associated human LDL is internalized and no evidence for any subsequent high-affinity degradation was obtained. Scatchard analysis of the binding data for human 125I-labeled LDL indicates that the high-affinity receptor for human LDL on rat hepatocytes possesses a Kd of 2.6 x 10(-8)M, while the binding is dependent on the extracellular Ca2+ concentration. Competition experiments indicate that both the apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins (human LDL and rat LDL) as well as the apolipoprotein E-containing lipoproteins (human HDL and rat HDL) do compete for the same surface receptor. It is concluded that hepatocytes freshly isolated from untreated rats do contain, in addition to the earlier described rat lipoprotein receptor which does not interact with human apolipoprotein B-containing LDL, a high-affinity receptor which interacts both with solely apolipoprotein B-containing human LDL and apolipoprotein E-containing lipoproteins.     

Binding, internalization, and degradation of high density lipoprotein by cultured normal human fibroblasts.

Comparative studies were made of the metabolism of plasma high density lipoprotein (HDL) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) by cultured normal human fibroblasts. On a molar basis, the surface binding of (125)I-HDL was only slightly less than that of (125)I-LDL, whereas the rates of internalization and degradation of (125)I-HDL were very low relative to those of (125)I-LDL. The relationships of internalization and degradation to binding suggested the presence of a saturable uptake mechanism for LDL functionally related to high-affinity binding. This was confirmed by the finding that the total uptake of (125)I-LDL (internalized plus degraded) at 5 micro g LDL protein/ml was 100-fold greater than that attributable to fluid or bulk pinocytosis, quantified with [(14)C]sucrose, and 10-fold greater than that attributable to the sum of fluid endocytosis and adsorptive endocytosis. In contrast, (125)I-HDL uptake could be almost completely accounted for by the uptake of medium during pinocytosis and by invagination of surface membrane (bearing bound lipoprotein) during pinocytosis. These findings imply that, at most, only a small fraction of bound HDL binds to the high-affinity LDL receptor and/or that HDL binding there is internalized very slowly. The rate of (125)I-HDL degradation by cultured fibroblasts (per unit cell mass) exceeded an estimate of the turnover rate of HDL in vivo, suggesting that peripheral tissues may contribute to HDL catabolism. In accordance with their differing rates of uptake and cholesterol content, LDL increased the cholesterol content of fibroblasts and selectively inhibited sterol biosynthesis, whereas HDL had neither effect.     

Effect of apoE on triglyceride emulsion interaction with hepatocyte and hepatoma G2 cells

The uptake and internalization of a triglyceride emulsion by rat hepatocytes in culture less than 24 hr was either inhibited or uninfluenced by apoE. ApoE significantly increased the uptake of these emulsions in later cultures. Specific low density lipoprotein (LDL) binding was similar for hepatocyte monolayers prior to and after 24 hr. Rat hepatocytes in culture for 2 days, which were treated with collagenase, detached and then replated within 1 hr and were apoE-responsive in 2 hr. Heparin inhibited the apoE stimulation in both hepatocytes and hepatoma monolayers. Heparin wash of hepatocytes or hepatoma cells incubated with apoE-[14C]triolein emulsions at 4 degrees C resulted in a considerable loss in radiolabeled cell lipid. A similar wash after 37 degrees C incubations produced little loss suggesting internalization. Hepatocytes had lower affinity but similar apoE-emulsion binding capacity compared to hepatoma cells. Triolein emulsions with apoE were significantly more rapidly metabolized by the hepatocyte than unsupplemented emulsions. The apoE-mediated hepatocyte lipid uptake was inhibited by apoC proteins. High molar ratios of free fatty acid/albumin also suppressed hepatocyte apoE-mediated lipid uptake. Both rat high density lipoprotein (HDL) and LDL inhibited with a potency directly related to their content of apoE. Human LDL and HDL without apoE also inhibited the interaction with less potency than the rat lipoproteins. Human HDL inhibition was diminished after removal of apoC proteins.     

Serum lipoproteins in rats bearing Morris hepatomas of different degrees of differentiation.

Serum lipoproteins were measured by ultracentrifugal means in rats bearing hepatomas of different degrees of malignancy (Morris hepatomas 16, 5123TC and 7777) to determine the effect of these hepatomas on serum lipoprotein levels. Serum lipoprotein patterns were altered, especially in rats bearing hepatomas 16 and 7777, which had elevated high-density lipoproteins. (They were not elevated in serum of rats bearing hepatoma 5123TC). This increase in high-density lipoproteins seems to be specific for chemically induced hepatomas since HDL2 is usually decreased in humans and animals with types of cancer not involving the liver. It appears that hepatomas can synthesize lipoproteins, and the serum levels of the host rats are altered depending on the hepatoma. Different biochemistries appear to be associated with each hepatoma. Cholesterol and fatty acid levels of unfractionated serum and of isolated lipoproteins also indicate abnormal lipid/lipoprotein metabolism associated with these hepatomas.     

SR-BI-mediated high density lipoprotein (HDL) endocytosis leads to HDL resecretion facilitating cholesterol efflux

The high density lipoprotein (HDL) receptor, scavenger receptor class B, type I (SR-BI), mediates selective cholesteryl ester uptake from lipoproteins into liver and steroidogenic tissues but also cholesterol efflux from macrophages to HDL. Recently, we demonstrated the uptake of HDL particles in SR-BI overexpressing Chinese hamster ovarian cells (ldlA7-SRBI) using ultrasensitive microscopy. In this study we show that this uptake of entire HDL particles is followed by resecretion. After uptake, HDL is localized in endocytic vesicles and organelles en route to the perinuclear area; many HDL-positive compartments were classified as multivesiculated and multilamellated organelles by electron microscopy. By using 125I-labeled HDL, we found that approximately 0.8% of the HDL added to the media is taken up by the ldlA7-SRBI cells within 1 h, and almost all HDL is finally resecreted. 125I-Labeled low density lipoprotein showed a very similar association, uptake, and resecretion pattern in ldlA7-SRBI cells that do not express any low density lipoprotein receptor. Moreover, we demonstrate that the process of HDL cell association, uptake, and resecretion occurs in three physiologically relevant cell systems, the liver cell line HepG2, the adrenal cell line Y1BS1, and phorbol myristate acetate-differentiated THP-1 cells as a model for macrophages. Finally, we present evidence that HDL retroendocytosis represents one of the pathways for cholesterol efflux.     

Endogenously produced endothelial lipase enhances binding and cellular processing of plasma lipoproteins via heparan sulfate proteoglycan-mediated pathway

Endothelial lipase (EL) is a new member of the triglyceride lipase gene family, which includes lipoprotein lipase (LpL) and hepatic lipase (HL). Enzymatic activity of EL has been studied before. Here we characterized the ability of EL to bridge lipoproteins to the cell surface. Expression of EL in wild-type Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 but not in heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG)-deficient CHO-677 cells resulted in 3-4.4-fold increases of 125I-low density lipoprotein (LDL) and 125I-high density lipoprotein 3 binding (HDL3). Inhibition of proteoglycan sulfation by sodium chlorate or incubation of cells with labeled lipoproteins in the presence of heparin (100 microg/ml) abolished bridging effects of EL. An enzymatically inactive EL, EL-S149A, was equally effective in facilitating lipoprotein bridging as native EL. Processing of LDL and HDL differed notably after initial binding via EL to the cell surface. More than 90% of the surface-bound 125I-LDL was destined for internalization and degradation, whereas about 70% of the surface-bound 125I-HDL3 was released back into the medium. These differences were significantly attenuated after HDL clustering was promoted using antibody against apolipoprotein A-I. At equal protein concentration of added lipoproteins the ratio of HDL3 to VLDL bridging via EL was 0.092 compared with 0.174 via HL and 0.002 via LpL. In summary, EL mediates binding and uptake of plasma lipoproteins via a process that is independent of its enzymatic activity, requires cellular heparan sulfate proteoglycans, and is regulated by ligand clustering.     

Uptake of rat plasma HDL subfractions labeled with [3H]cholesteryl linoleyl ether or with 125I by cultured rat hepatocytes and adrenal cells

Rat plasma low- and high-density lipoproteins were labeled with [3H]cholesteryl linoleyl ether and isolated by rate-zonal ultracentrifugation into apolipoprotein B-containing LDL, apolipoprotein E-containing HDL1 and apolipoprotein E-poor HDL2. These fractions were incubated with cultured rat hepatocytes and comparable amounts of all lipoproteins were taken up by the cells. Rat HDL was isolated at d 1.085-1.21 g/ml and apolipoprotein E-free HDL was prepared by heparin Sepharose chromatography. The original HDL and the apolipoprotein E-free HDL were labeled with 125I or with [3H]cholesteryl linoleyl ether and incubated with rat hepatocytes or adrenal cells in culture. The uptake of apolipoprotein E-free [3H]cholesterol linoleyl ether HDL by the cultured hepatocytes was 20-40% more than that of the original HDL. Comparison of uptake of cholesteryl ester moiety (represented by uptake of [3H]cholesteryl linoleyl ether) and of protein moiety (represented by metabolism of 125I-labeled protein) was carried out using both original and apolipoprotein E-free HDL. In experiments in which low concentrations of HDL were used, the ratio of 3H/125I exceeded 1.0. In cultured adrenal cells, the uptake of [3H]cholesteryl linoleyl ether-labeled HDL was stimulated 3-6-fold by 1 X 10(-7) M ACTH, while the uptake of 125I-labeled HDL increased about 2-fold. The ratio of 3H/125I representing cellular uptake was 2-3 and increased to 5 in ACTH-treated cells. The present results indicate that in cultured rat hepatocytes the uptake of homologous HDL does not depend on the presence of apolipoprotein E. Evidence was also presented for an uptake of cholesteryl ester independent of protein uptake in cultured rat adrenal cells and to a lesser extent in rat hepatocytes.     

Lipoprotein lipase-dependent binding and uptake of low density lipoproteins by THP-1 monocytes and macrophages: possible involvement of lipid rafts

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is produced by cells in the artery wall and can mediate binding of lipoproteins to cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG), resulting in endocytosis (the bridging function). Active, dimeric LPL may dissociate to inactive monomers, the main form found in plasma. We have studied binding/internalization of human low density lipoprotein (LDL), mediated by bovine LPL, using THP-1 monocytes and macrophages. Uptake of (125)I-LDL was similar in monocytes and macrophages and was not affected by the LDL-receptor family antagonist receptor-associated protein (RAP) or by the phagocytosis inhibitor cytochalasin D. In contrast, uptake depended on HSPG and on membrane cholesterol. Incubation in the presence of dexamethasone increased the endogenous production of LPL by the cells and also increased LPL-mediated binding of LDL to the cell surfaces. Monomeric LPL was bound to the cells mostly in a heparin-resistant fashion. We conclude that the uptake of LDL mediated by LPL dimers is receptor-independent and involves cholesterol-enriched membrane areas (lipid rafts). Dimeric and monomeric LPL differ in their ability to mediate binding/uptake of LDL, probably due to different mechanisms for binding/internalization.     

Interaction of high density lipoprotein with its receptor on cultured fibroblasts and macrophages. Evidence for reversible binding at the cell surface without internalization

Cultured extrahepatic cells possess a specific high affinity receptor for high density lipoprotein (HDL) that is induced by cholesterol delivery to cells. Current results suggest that HDL receptors on cultured human fibroblasts and mouse peritoneal macrophages promote reversible binding of HDL to the cell surface without internalization of lipoprotein particles. When 125I-HDL3 was bound to cultured cells at 0 degrees C and then warmed to 37 degrees C after removal of unbound lipoprotein, most of the cell surface-bound HDL was released rapidly (t1/2 = 3 min) into the medium without entering a cellular pool that was inaccessible to digestion by trypsin at 0 degrees C. This lack of internalization of HDL was evident under conditions where internalization of 125I-low density lipoprotein and 125I-transferrin were readily detected. When cells were exposed to 125I-HDL3 at 37 degrees C, only a trace amount of iodinated apoprotein remained associated with cells after treatment of cells with trypsin. Fibroblasts treated with medium containing increasing concentrations of cholesterol exhibited a dose-dependent increase in reversible, trypsin-sensitive binding of 125I-HDL3 at 37 degrees C without an attendant increase in trypsin-resistant binding. These results suggest that reversible binding of HDL to its cell-surface receptor without subsequent endocytosis of receptor-HDL complexes is the mechanism by which HDL receptors facilitate cholesterol transport from cells.     

Disparities in the interaction of rat and human lipoproteins with cultured rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. Requirements for homology for receptor binding activity

This study characterizes the interactions of various rat and human lipoproteins with the lipoprotein cell surface receptors of rat and human cells. Iodinated rat very low density lipoproteins (VLDL), rat chylomicron remnants, rat low density lipoproteins (LDL), and rat high density lipoproteins containing predominantly apoprotein E (HDL1) bound to high affinity cell surface receptors of cultured rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. Rat VLDL and chylomicron remnants were most avidly bound; the B-containing LDL and the E-containing HDL1 displayed lesser but similar binding. Rat HDL (d = 1.125 to 1.21) exhibited weak receptor binding; however, after recentrifugation to remove apoprotein E, they were devoid of binding activity. Competitive binding studies at 4 degrees C confirmed these results for normal lipoproteins and indicated that VLDL (B-VLDL), LDL, and HDLc (cholesterol-rich HDL1) isolated from hypercholesterolemic rats had increased affinity for the rat receptors compared with their normal counterparts, the most pronounced change being in the LDL. The cell surface receptor pathway in rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells resembled the system described for human fibroblasts as follows: 1) lipoproteins containing either the B or E apoproteins interacted with the receptors; 2) receptor binding activity was abolished by acetoacetylation or reductive methylation of a limited number of lysine residues of the lipoproteins; 3) receptor binding initiated the process of internalization and degradation of the apo-B- and apo-E-containing lipoproteins; 4) the lipoprotein cholesterol was re-esterified as determined by [14C]oleate incorporation into the cellular cholesteryl esters; and 5) receptor-mediated uptake (receptor number) was lipoprotein cholesterol. An important difference between rat and human fibroblasts was the inability of human LDL to interact with the cell surface receptors of rat fibroblasts. Rat lipoproteins did, however, react with human fibroblasts. Furthermore, the rat VLDL were the most avidly bound of the rat lipoproteins to rat fibroblasts. When the direct binding of 125I-VLDL was subjected to Scatchard analysis, the very high affinity of rat VLDL was apparent (Kd = 1 X 10(-11) M). Moreover, compared with data for rat LDL, the data suggested each VLDL particle bound to four to nine lipoprotein receptors. This multiple receptor binding could explain the enhanced binding affinity of the rat VLDL. The Scatchard plot of rat 125I-VLDL revealed a biphasic binding curve in rat and human fibroblast cells and in rat smooth muscle cells, suggesting two populations of rat VLDL. These results indicate that rat cells have a receptor pathway similar to, but not identical with, the LDL pathway of human cells. Since human LDL bind poorly to rat cell receptors on cultured rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells, metabolic studies using human lipoproteins in rats must be interpreted cautiously.     

Receptors for homologous plasma lipoproteins on a rat hepatoma cell line

Hepatocytes express on their surfaces more than one class of receptors capable of mediating the internalization of lipoproteins. However, relatively little is known about the binding characteristics of hepatic receptors for various lipoproteins, about the regulation of the receptors, and about the consequences for intracellular lipid metabolism of uptake of lipoproteins via different classes of receptors. The aim of the present studies was to characterize the binding and degradation of various lipoproteins and their mutual competition for cellular processing. Since these kinds of studies may be more easily carried out in continuous established hepatoma cell lines than in nondividing primary hepatocyte cultures, we examined the lipoprotein receptor functions of a well differentiated rat hepatoma (H-35). Cells were grown to confluence in Eagle's minimal essential medium in 15% newborn calf serum. Medium then was changed to 15% lipoprotein-deficient serum for 44 hr before experiments. External binding of 125I-labeled rat plasma and intestinal lymph lipoproteins was assessed at 4 degrees C. Cellular uptake and degradation were assessed at 37 degrees C. Lipoproteins were isolated by fixed angle or zonal ultracentrifugation or by heparin affinity column chromatography and characterized as to their lipid and apoprotein compositions. Labeled low density (LDL), high density (HDL2), non-apoE-HDL, very low density lipoproteins (VLDL), and chylomicron remnants (CM-R) each manifested specific and saturable binding and degradation by the hepatoma cells. Competition experiments indicated that separate receptors were present for LDL, HDL2, and CM-R. Most of HDL2 appeared to be bound to the non-apoE-HDL receptor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Binding properties of high-density lipoprotein subfractions and low-density lipoproteins to rabbit hepatocytes

Primary cultures of rabbit hepatocytes which were preincubated for 20 h in a medium containing lipoprotein-deficient serum subsequently bound, internalized and degraded 125I-labeled high-density lipoproteins2 (HDL2). The rate of degradation of HDL2 was constant in incubations from 3 to 25 h. As the concentration of HDL2 in the incubation medium was increased, binding reached saturation. At 37 degrees C, half-maximal binding (Km) was achieved at a concentration of 7.3 micrograms of HDL2 protein/ml (4.06 X 10(-8)M) and the maximum amount bound was 476 ng of HDL2 protein/mg of cell protein. At 4 degrees C, HDL2 had a Km of 18.6 micrograms protein/ml (1.03 X 10(-7)M). Unlabeled low-density lipoproteins (LDL) inhibited only at low concentrations of 125I-labeled HDL2. Quantification of 125I-labeled HDL2 binding to a specific receptor (based on incubation of cells at 4 degrees C with and without a 50-fold excess of unlabeled HDL) yielded a dissociation constant of 1.45 X 10(-7)M. Excess HDL2 inhibited the binding of both 125I-labeled HDL2 and 125I-labeled HDL3, but excess HDL3 did not affect the binding of 125I-labeled HDL3. Preincubation of hepatocytes in the presence of HDL resulted in only a 40% reduction in specific HDL2 receptors, whereas preincubation with LDL largely suppressed LDL receptors. HDL2 and LDL from control and hypercholesterolemic rabbits inhibited the degradation of 125I-labeled HDL2, but HDL3 did not. Treatment of HDL2 and LDL with cyclohexanedione eliminated their capacity to inhibit 125I-labeled HDL2 degradation, suggesting that apolipoprotein E plays a critical role in triggering the degradative process. The effect of incubation with HDL on subsequent 125I-labeled LDL binding was time-dependent: a 20 h preincubation with HDL reduced the amount of 125I-labeled LDL binding by 40%; there was a similar effect on LDL bound in 6 h but not on LDL bound in 3 h. The binding of 125I-labeled LDL to isolated liver cellular membranes demonstrated saturation kinetics at 4 degrees C and was inhibited by EDTA or excess LDL. The binding of 125I-labeled HDL2 was much lower than that of 125I-labeled LDL and was less inhibited by unlabeled lipoproteins. The binding of 125I-labeled HDL3 was not inhibited by any unlabeled lipoproteins. EDTA did not affect the binding of either HDL2 or HDL3 to isolated liver membranes. Hepatocytes incubated with [2-14C]acetate in the absence of lipoproteins incorporated more label into cellular cholesterol, nonsaponifiable lipids and total cellular lipid than hepatocytes incubated with [2-14C]acetate in the presence of any lipoprotein fraction. However, the level of 14C-labeled lipids released into the medium was higher in the presence of medium lipoproteins, indicating that the effect of those lipoproteins was on the rate of release of cellular lipids rather than on the rate of synthesis.     

Interaction of canine and swine lipoproteins with the low density lipoprotein receptor of fibroblasts as correlated with heparin/manganese precipitability.

Canine HDL1 and canine and swine HDLc were fractionated into several lipoprotein subpopulations by heparin/manganese precipitation. The ability of the various subfractions of HDL1 or HDLc to compete with 125I-labeled low density lipoproteins (LDL) for binding and degradation by human fibroblasts was compared. The HDL1 or HDLc which precipitated at the lowest concentration of heparin (a concentration which precipitates LDL) were the most effective in competing with 125I-LDL for binding, internalization, and degradation. A striking characteristic of these lipoproteins was the occurrence of a prominence of the arginine-rich apoprotein. The HDL1 or HDLc subfractions which were not precipitated by heparin/managanese lacked detectable arginine-rich apoprotein and did not compete significantly with the 125I-LDL for binding and degradation. Furthermore, the lipid to protein ratio differed in the precipitable and nonprecipitable lipoproteins, with those which were most efficiently bound and degraded containing more cholesterol. Specific lipoprotein interaction with heparin and with the cell surface receptors may occur by a common mechanism; namely, through a positively charged region on the lipoprotein surface which may reside with the B and arginine-rich apoproteins.     

Metabolism of low-density lipoproteins by cultured hepatocytes from normal and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemic subjects

The profoundly elevated concentrations of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) present in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia lead to symptomatic cardiovascular disease and death by early adulthood. Studies conducted in nonhepatic tissues demonstrated defective cellular recognition and metabolism of LDL in these patients. Since mammalian liver removes at least half of the LDL in the circulation, the metabolism of LDL by cultured hepatocytes isolated from familial hypercholesterolemic homozygotes was compared to hepatocytes from normal individuals. Fibroblast studies demonstrated that the familial hypercholesterolemic subjects studied were LDL receptor-negative (less than 1% normal receptor activity) and LDL receptor-defective (18% normal receptor activity). Cholesterol-depleted hepatocytes from normal subjects bound and internalized 125I-labeled LDL (Bmax = 2.2 micrograms LDL/mg cell protein). Preincubation of normal hepatocytes with 200 micrograms/ml LDL reduced binding and internalization by approx. 40%. In contrast, 125I-labeled LDL binding and internalization by receptor-negative familial hypercholesterolemic hepatocytes was unaffected by cholesterol loading and considerably lower than normal. This residual LDL uptake could not be ascribed to fluid phase endocytosis as determined by [14C]sucrose uptake. The residual LDL binding by familial hypercholesterolemia hepatocytes led to a small increase in hepatocyte cholesterol content which was relatively ineffective in reducing hepatocyte 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase activity. Receptor-defective familial hypercholesterolemia hepatocytes retained some degree of regulatable 125I-labeled LDL uptake, but LDL uptake did not lead to normal hepatocyte cholesterol content or 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase activity. These combined results indicate that the LDL receptor abnormality present in familial hypercholesterolemia fibroblasts reflects deranged hepatocyte LDL recognition and metabolism. In addition, a low-affinity, nonsaturable uptake process for LDL is present in human liver which does not efficiently modulate hepatocyte cholesterol content or synthesis.