INFLORESCENCE DEVELOPMENT IN TWO ANNUAL TEOSINTES: ZEA MAYS SUBSP. MEXICANA AND Z. MAYS SUBSP. PARVIGLUMIS

The ontogeny of tassels and ears in two annual Mexican teosintes, Zea mays subsp. mexicana and Z. mays subsp. parviglumis, was examined using scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy. Ear development in these annual teosintes follows a pattern previously described as leading to the bisexual mixed inflorescence in Z. diploperennis. Common bud primordia are initiated in the axils of distichously arranged bracts along the ear axis. These common primordia bifurcate to form paired sessile and pedicellate spikelet primordia. Development of pedicellate spikelets is arrested leaving the sessile spikelets, along with the adjoining rachis segment, to form solitary grains enclosed within cupulate fruitcases. Development of the central tassel spike is similar to that previously described in the Z. diploperennis tassel, except that the first formed axillary bud primordia form precocious tassel branches. The origin of these tassel branches suggests a possible mechanism for the transition from a distichous spike, characteristic of teosinte, to a polystichous spike, typical of maize.     

Early inflorescence and floral development in Zea mays land race Chapalote (Poaceae)

Tassel and ear primordia were collected from greenhouse-grown specimens of the Mexican maize landrace Chapalote and prepared for scanning electron microscopic (SEM) examination. Measurements of inflorescence apices and spikelet pair primordia (spp) were made from SEM micrographs. Correlation of inflorescence apex diameter with number of spikelet ranks showed no significant difference between tassels and ears, except at the two-rank level where the ear apical meristem had a significantly smaller diameter than corresponding two-ranked tassels. Within individual inflorescences, spp in different ranks enlarged at comparable rates, although the rates from one ear to the next along the stem differed. In both tassels and ears, spp divide to form paired sessile and pedicellate spikelet primordia when the spp is 150 μm wide; ear axes are significantly thicker than tassel axes at the time of bifurcation. The similarities in growth between ear and tassel primordia lend further support to the hypothesis that both the maize tassel and ear are derived from a common inflorescence pattern, a pattern shared with teosinte. Inflorescence primordial growth also suggests that a key character difference between teosinte and maize, distichous vs. polystichous arrangement of spikelets, may be related to size of the apical dome and/or rate of primordium production by the apical meristem. There appears to be more than a single morphological event in the shift from vegetative to reproductive growth. The evocation of axillary buds (ears) is independent of, and temporally separated from, the transition to flowering at the primary shoot apex (tassel).     

Inflorescence development in a perennial teosinte: Zea perennis (Poaceae)

The ontogeny of tassels and ears in a perennial Mexican teosinte, Zea perennis (Hitchc.) Reeves and Mangelsdorf, was examined using scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy. Ear development follows a pattern previously described for two annual teosintes, Z. mays subsp. mexicana and Z. mays subsp. parviglumis var. parviglumis (race Balsas), and for the bisexual mixed inflorescence in a diploperennial teosinte, Z. diploperennis; it differs from that described for the ear of Z. diploperennis plants grown at the latitudes of Iowa and Wisconsin. Common bud primordia of the ear are initiated in the axil of distichously arranged bracts along the ear axis. These common primordia bifurcate to form paired pedicellate and sessile spikelet primordia. Development of the pedicellate spikelets in the ear is arrested leaving the sessile spikelets, along with the adjoining rachis segment, to form solitary grains enclosed within cupulate fruitcases. The organogenesis of the central spike of the tassel is similar to that previously described in other Zea taxa. This developmental study supports the hypothesis that both femaleness and maleness are derived from and expressed on a common background; it is consistent with the view that the maize ear was derived from the central spike of a male inflorescence terminating a primary branch of the main axis of the inflorescence.     

Inflorescence development in a new teosinte: Zea nicaraguensis (Poaceae)

Inflorescence development in a newly discovered teosinte, Zea nicaraguensis (Poaceae), from Nicaragua has been investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM examination revealed that the pattern of both male and female inflorescence development was similar to previously described inflorescence in other Zea taxa. Branch primordia were initiated acropetally in a distichous pattern along the rachis of male and female inflorescences. Spikelet pair primordia bifurcated into pedicellate and sessile spikelet primordia. Predictably, pedicellate spikelet development was arrested and aborted in the female teosinte inflorescence. Organogenesis of functional spikelets and florets was similar to that previously described in maize and teosintes. The results were consistent with our hypothesis that both femininity and masculinity share a common mechanism of inflorescence development in Zea and Tripsacum and are in accord with a putative common mechanism of sex determination in the Andropogoneae. Interestingly, this population of teosinte, unique in its ability to grow in water-logged soils, showed a stable pattern of early inflorescence development. Our results also revealed the uncharacteristic presence of inflorescence polystichy in this population of Zea nicaraguensis. We propose this novel phenotypic variation raises the possibility that a domestic evolution of polystichy in maize was enabled by an occasional polystichous phenotypic in teosinte.     

Analysis of inflorescence organogenesis in eastern gamagrass, Tripsacum dactyloides (Poaceae): the wild type and the gynomonoecious gsf1 mutant

Inflorescence organogenesis of a wild-type and a gynomonoecious (pistillate) mutant in Tripsacum dactyloides was studied using scanning electron microscopy. SEM (scanning electron microscope) analysis indicated that wild-type T. dactyloides (Eastern gamagrass) expressed a pattern of inflorescence organogenesis that is observed in other members of the subtribe Tripsacinae (Zea: maize and teosinte), family Poaceae. Branch primordia are initiated acropetally along the rachis of wild-type inflorescences in a distichous arrangement. Branch primordia at the base of some inflorescences develop into long branches, which themselves produce an acropetal series of distichous spikelet pair primordia. All other branch primordia function as spikelet pair primordia and bifurcate into pedicellate and sessile spikelet primordia. In all wild-type inflorescences development of the pedicellate spikelets is arrested in the proximal portion of the rachis, and these spikelets abort, leaving two rows of solitary sessile spikelets. Organogenesis of spikelets and florets in wild-type inflorescences is similar to that previously described in maize and the teosintes. Our analysis of gsf1 mutant inflorescences reveals a pattern of development similar to that of the wild type, but differs from the wild type in retaining (1) the pistillate condition in paired spikelets along the distal portion of the rachis and (2) the lower floret in sessile spikelets in the proximal region of the rachis. The gsf1 mutation blocks gynoecial tissue abortion in both the paired-spikelet and the unpaired-spikelet zone. This study supports the hypothesis that both femaleness and maleness in Zea and Tripsacum inflorescences are derived from a common developmental pathway. The pattern of inflorescence development is not inconsistent with the view that the maize ear was derived from a Tripsacum genomic background.     

Evolution of female sexuality in the maize ear (Zea mays L. subsp.mays—Gramineae)

The discovery of staminodes within the female inflorescences, or “ears,” of some Mexican maize races, and of feminized male inflorescences in annual Mexican teosinte, provides additional support for the theory that the ears of maize evolved from the male primary lateral branch tassels of teosinte by sexual transmutation, and that teosinte is the wild ancestor of maize.     

Organogenesis of Fascicled ear mutant inflorescences in maize (Poaceae)

The ontogeny of staminate tassels and pistillate ears in the maize mutant Fascicled ear was examined using scanning electron microscopy. The normal pattern of inflorescence development is perturbed by the Fascicled ear mutation at the transition stage. The Fascicled ear mutation promotes the development of an abnormal transition stage axis that is both shorter and broader than the wild type. The inflorescence apical meristem then undergoes a bifurcation, and two inflorescence axes arise in place of a single axis. Each derived inflorescence apical meristem may undergo a similar perturbation sequence. This expression of the Fascicled ear mutation may be repeated one to several times, which leads to the development of a fascicled pistillate inflorescence and a fascicled central spike in the staminate inflorescence. The apical meristems of some tassel branches are also bifurcated. Subsequent organogenesis during paired-spikelet and floral development in Fascicled ear plants follows the pattern of normal maize. However, triplet spikelets are occasionally observed. The organogenic disruption by the Fascicled ear mutation that we describe will aid genetic and molecular analysis on the regulation of inflorescence development in maize and other members of the genus Zea.     

Inflorescence development in the “standard exotic” maize,Argentine popcorn (Poaceae)

Argentine popcorn is an exotic race considered by some to be similar to the earliest cultivated maize. We used scanning electron microscopy to examine inflorescence development in both the tassel and ear. In our material, and under our conditions, both two-ranked central tassel spikes and two-ranked ears were observed as well as more typical four-ranked structures. Subsequent development of spikelets and florets was similar to that observed in other varieties of maize and in their close relatives—the teosintes. We suggest that the switch from two-ranked to four-ranked inflorescences (a key trait difference between teosinte and maize) may be due to a change in developmental timing allowing an additional meristem bifurcation of axillary branch primordia prior to the initiation of spikelet pair primordia.     

Phyllotactic pattern is altered in the transition to flowering in the early ears of Zea mays landrace chapalote (Poaceae)

The origin of polystichy in the maize ear and central tassel spike continues to challenge our understanding of evolution in this important crop species. In this paper we tested the hypothesis that the change in phyllotaxy occurs in the region of husk leaf production before the transition to reproductive growth. Young ear or presumptive ear primordia were dissected to examine the transition from distichous husk leaves below the ear through spiral phyllotaxy to the polystichous arrangement of spikelet pair primordia in the young ear. Serial transverse sections were used to document the thickness of successive disks of insertion of lateral primordia and to reconstruct the path of procambial differentiation. The transition in phyllotaxy, though variable, typically occurs in the vegetative zone and is associated with periodic heterogeneity in the thickness of leaf bases and a delay in the development of waves of procambial differentiation into the base of the young ear.     

Homeotic Sexual Translocations and the Origin of Maize (Zea Mays, Poaceae): A New look at an old problem

In the Origin of Maize Controversy, the Orthodox Teosinte Hypothesis (OTH; Beadle 1939, 1972; Iltis 1971), five key mutations change 2-ranked (distichous) ears of teosinte (wild Zea) with a single row of grains per rank to 4- to many-ranked (polystichous) maize ears with a double row of grains per rank. BUT teosinte ears are lateral to the 1° branch axes, maize ears, like their male homologues, the teosinte I° branch tassel spikes, terminal, an enigma long unrecognized, hence ignored. In the Catastrophic Sexual Transmutation Theory (CSTT; Iltis 1983b, 1987), now abandoned, the I° branch tassel (male) of teosinte (spikelets soft-glumed, paired, i.e., double-rowed per rank, as in maize ears), when brought under female hormonal control by branch condensation, becomes feminized into a maize proto-ear. BUT lateral ears should then have remained teosintoid (2-ranked, each rank with a single row of grains), yet are in fact double-rowed. Combining OTH and CSTT, the new Sexual Translocation Theory (STLT) is based on: first, the branching pattern of teosinte ear clusters (Cámara-H. & Gambino 1990), sequentially maturing, sympodially branching, typically Andropogonoid systems, called rhipidia (sing, rhipidium), where each higher order (younger) ear originates as a lateral branch of its lower order, earlier maturing predecessor; and second, on 3 or 4 key mutations [cupule reduction, softening of glumes, doubling of female spikelets], which, by projecting outward the grains, invited human domestication by making them accessible. Within each ear cluster, the earliest maturing, hence nutrient-monopolizing and largest ear would be selected, all younger ears, already nutrientinhibited, suppressed. As fewer, larger ears evolved, and branch internode condensation moved male tassels into female hormonal zones, homeotic conversions translocated female morphology to terminal male positions: first replacing each of the II° branch tassels, and ultimately the 1° branch tassel (male), with an ear (female). With this, now female structure in the apically dominant, hence most nutrient-demanding terminal position gradually suppressing all subsidiary ears on the 1° branch beneath it, mutations for polystichy (contingent on nutrient overload) were finally allowed to become expressed, and the multi-rowed maize ear (at first with an atavistic male tail) evolved. Favored by human selection, these increases in apical dominance by stepwise homeotic sexual conversions explain both archeological and morphological realities, but need to be harmonized with recent results of developmental genetics. Current evidence suggests that teosinte was first tended for its green ears and sugary pith by hunter-gatherers as an occasional rainy-season food in small “garden” populations away from its homeland, and not for its abundant grain-containing, hard fruitcases, which easily mass-collected but useless as food, are as yet unknown from the archeological record. A rare grain-liberating teosinte mutation (probably expressed in only one “founder” plant, a mazoid “Eve”), which exposed the encased grain for easy harvest, was soon recognized as useful, collected and planted (or self-planted). Thus maize was started on its way to a unique horticultural domestication that is not comparable to that of the temperate Old World mass-selected agricultural grains.     

DEVELOPMENT OF TASSEL SEED 2 INFLORESCENCES IN MAIZE

The normal pattern of maize floral development of staminate florets on the terminal inflorescence (tassel) and pistillate florets on the lateral inflorescences (ears) is disrupted by the recessive mutation tassel seed 2. Tassel seed 2 mutant plants develop pistillate florets instead of staminate florets in the tassel. In addition, the ears of tassel seed 2 plants display irregular rowing of kernels due to the development of the normally suppressed lower floret of each spikelet. The morphology of tassel and ear florets of the recessive maize mutant tassel seed 2 has been compared to those of wild-type maize through development. We have identified the earliest stages at which morphological signs of sex differentiation are evident. We find that sex determination occurs during the same stage on tassel and ear development. Early postsex determination morphology of florets in wild-type ears and in tassel seed 2 tassels and ears is identical.     

Class II tassel seed mutations provide evidence for multiple types of inflorescence meristems in maize (Poaceae)

The tassel seed mutations ts4 and Ts6 of maize cause irregular branching in its inflorescences, tassels, and ears, in addition to feminization of the tassel due to the failure to abort pistils. A comparison of the development of mutant and wild-type tassels and ears using scanning electron microscopy reveals that at least four reproductive meristem types can be identified in maize: the inflorescence meristem, the spikelet pair meristem, the spikelet meristem, and the floret meristem. ts4 and Ts6 mutations affect the fate of specific reproductive meristems in both tassels and ears. ts4 mutants fail to form spikelet meristems from spikelet pair meristems. Ts6 mutants are delayed in the conversion of certain spikelet meristems into floret meristems. Once floret meristems are established in both of these mutants, they form florets that appear normal but fail to undergo pistil abortion in the tassel. The abnormal branching associated with each mutant is suppressed at the base of ears, permitting the formation of normal, fertile spikelets. The classification of the different types of reproductive meristems will be useful in interpretation of gene expression patterns in maize. It also provides a framework for understanding meristem functions that can be varied to diversify inflorescence architectures in the Gramineae.     

Pollination between maize and teosinte: an important determinant of gene flow in Mexico

Gene flow between maize [Zea mays (L.)] and its wild relatives does occur, but at very low frequencies. Experiments were undertaken in Tapachula, Nayarit, Mexico to investigate gene flow between a hybrid maize, landraces of maize and teosinte (Z. mays ssp. mexicana, races Chalco and Central Plateau). Hybridization, flowering synchrony, pollen size and longevity, silk elongation rates, silk and trichome lengths and tassel diameter and morphology were measured. Hybrid and open-pollinated maize ears produced a mean of 8 and 11 seeds per ear, respectively, when hand-pollinated with teosinte pollen, which is approximately 1–2% of the ovules normally produced on a hybrid maize ear. Teosinte ears produced a mean of 0.2–0.3 seeds per ear when pollinated with maize pollen, which is more than one-fold fewer seeds than produced on a maize ear pollinated with teosinte pollen. The pollination rate on a per plant basis was similar in the context of a maize plant with 400–500 seeds and a teosinte plant with 30–40 inflorescences and 9–12 fruitcases per inflorescence. A number of other factors also influenced gene-flow direction: (1) between 90% and 95% of the fruitcases produced on teosinte that was fertilized by maize pollen were sterile; (2) teosinte collections were made in an area where incompatibility systems that limit fertilization are present; (3) silk longevity was much shorter for teosinte than for maize (approx. 4 days vs. approx. 11 days); (4) teosinte produced more pollen on a per plant basis than the landraces and commercial hybrid maize; (5) teosinte frequently produced lateral branches with silks close to a terminal tassel producing pollen. Collectively these factors tend to favor crossing in the direction of teosinte to maize. Our results support the hypothesis that gene flow and the subsequent introgression of maize genes into teosinte populations most probably results from crosses where teosinte first pollinates maize. The resultant hybrids then backcross with teosinte to introgress the maize genes into the teosinte genome. This approach would slow introgression and may help explain why teosinte continues to co-exist as a separate entity even though it normally grows in the vicinity of much larger populations of maize.     

Simple inheritance of key traits distinguishing maize and teosinte

The segregation of key traits distinguishing maize and teosinte was analyzed in three F₂ and three backcross populations derived from crosses of the modern maize inbred T232 withZea mays ssp.parviglumis. These traits were (i) paired vs. single female spikelets; (ii) two-ranked vs. many-ranked ears; (iii) non-indurated vs. indurated glumes; (iv) inclination of the kernels toward the rachis, and (v) distichous vs. polystichous central staminate spike. All traits showed a simple mode of inheritance except for paired female spikes, which appeared to be controlled by two genes. The loci controlling these major changes were mapped with RFLP markers to four chromosomal regions. These results support the suggestion that maize became differentiated from teosinte with as few as five major gene changes.This paper is dedicated to the memory of Professor Jean Pernes     

Development of the mixed inflorescence in Zea diploperennis litis, Doebley & Guzman (Poaceae)

Development of the mixed inflorescence in Zea diploperennis Iltis, Doebley & Guzman (Poaceae) Mixed inflorescences of diploperennial teosinte, which terminate the main branches of the plant, arise in the same fashion as tassel spikes. The apical meristem produces bracts in a decussate arrangement. A single axillary bud primordium is initiated in the axil of each bract. Growth of the bract is retarded as the bud enlarges and divides longitudinally into two separate spikelet primordia. The paired spikelets running in two ranks on either side of the inflorescence primordium produce the four-rowed condition typical of teosinte tasselS. In the transition region between male and female portions of the inflorescence, development of the pedicellate spikelet of each spikelet pair is arrested at an early ontogenetic stage. Continued growth of the sessile spikelet and associated rachis flaps destroy the remnants of the arrested spikelet in basal portions of the inflorescence. A similar abortion of the lower floret of the sessile spikelet results in a single pistillate floret per node at anthesis. These results provide further support for the hypothesis that a tassel-like mixed inflorescence of teosinte is ancestral to the maize ear.     

Expression patterns and mutant phenotype of teosinte branched1 correlate with growth suppression in maize and teosinte

The evolution of domesticated maize from its wild ancestor teosinte is a dramatic example of the effect of human selection on agricultural crops. Maize has one dominant axis of growth, whereas teosinte is highly branched. The axillary branches in maize are short and feminized whereas the axillary branches of teosinte are long and end in a male inflorescence under normal growth conditions. Previous QTL and molecular analysis suggested that the teosinte branched1 (tb1) gene of maize contributed to the architectural difference between maize and teosinte. tb1 mutants of maize resemble teosinte in their overall architecture. We analyzed the tb1 mutant phenotype in more detail and showed that the highly branched phenotype was due to the presence of secondary and tertiary axillary branching, as well as to an increase in the length of each node, rather than to an increase in the number of nodes. Double-mutant analysis with anther ear1 and tassel seed2 revealed that the sex of the axillary inflorescence was not correlated with its length. RNA in situ hybridization showed that tb1 was expressed in maize axillary meristems and in stamens of ear primordia, consistent with a function of suppressing growth of these tissues. Expression in teosinte inflorescence development suggests a role in pedicellate spikelet suppression. Our results provide support for a role for tb1 in growth suppression and reveal the specific tissues where suppression may occur.     

Suppressor of sessile spikelets1 (Sosl): a dominant mutant affecting inflorescence development in maize

Suppressor of sessile spikeletsl (Sos1) is a dominant mutant of maize that blocks branching of the spikelet-pair primordium to form the sessile spikelet during ear development. As a result, Sos1 mutant ears and tassels possess single spikelets as opposed to the normal condition of paired spikelets, one sessile and the other pedicellate. Sos1 also causes a reduction in the number of tassel branches and the number of orthostichies (or cupule ranks) in the ear. The sos1 genetic locus maps to the short arm of maize chromosome 4. The Sos1 single spikelet phenotype appears similar to the single spikelet phenotype found in teosinte, the probable progenitor of maize. This similarity invites the hypothesis that sos1 had a role in the evolution of maize from teosinte. However, genetic mapping data and a comparison of the developmental basis of the single spikelet condition in the Sos1 mutant and teosinte demonstrate that their similar phenotypes result from distinct genetic-developmental mechanisms. These results indicate that sos1 was not involved in the evolution of maize and caution against drawing conclusions of homology based solely on similar adult phenotypes.