Quantitative calculations of temporomandibular joint reaction forces--I. The importance of the magnitude of the jaw muscle forces

The effect of measurement errors on quantitative calculation of temporomandibular joint reaction force was investigated in a two-dimensional, two-muscle model. A computer program using the model incremented the magnitude of the bite force and muscle forces and the lengths of their moment arms, and calculated the joint reaction force at each increment. Computation of the joint reaction force is most sensitive to the relative lengths of the bite force and muscle forces moment arms. Absolute values for each muscle force are not required and errors in the magnitudes of the muscle forces have only a minor effect on calculation of the total joint reaction force.     

Translational stiffness of the replaced shoulder joint

Results after a total shoulder arthroplasty in rheumatoid patients are poor, indicated by loosening of especially the glenoid component, bad joint functionality and the possibility of a joint dislocation. The failure mechanisms behind this are multiple, including patient, surgical and design factors. These results must be improved. At present, the optimal geometrical prosthesis component design, focused on joint conformity and constraint, still has to be investigated.

Proper understanding of the effect of geometrical design parameters on the theoretical relationship between joint translations and joint forces may contribute to improved designs. The main objective of this study is to theoretically describe this relationship and to investigate the joint translational stiffness, which can be used to investigate the effect of design parameters on joint motion. Joint translational stiffness is the gradient of the subluxation force with respect to the humeral head displacement.

For this static analysis a potential field is introduced, as the result of a joint compressive force (muscle forces) and a subluxation force (external forces). The positive and negative stiffness during articulation inside and subluxation outside the glenoid cavity, lead to stable and unstable equilibrium joint positions, respectively. A most lateral position of the humeral head centre coincides with a zero subluxation force; at this position the humerus is dislocated and a restoring force is needed to relocate the humeral head.

Joint conformity and compression force influence the joint translational stiffness during articulation inside the glenoid cavity, whereas during articulating outside the glenoid cavity this is influenced by the joint compression force and humeral radius of curvature. The glenoid radius of curvature influences the contact point and, in combination with the glenoid superior–inferior chord length, it also influences the constraintness angle, which influences the maximum allowable subluxation load to prevent a joint dislocation. This constraintness angle together with the joint conformity also influences maximum joint translations before articulation outside the glenoid cavity. Furthermore, the sign of the joint translational stiffness determines the stability of shoulder motion, which is stable and unstable if this stiffness is positive and negative, respectively.     

Anterior hip joint force increases with hip extension, decreased gluteal force, or decreased iliopsoas force

Abnormal or excessive force on the anterior hip joint may cause anterior hip pain, subtle hip instability and a tear of the acetabular labrum. We propose that both the pattern of muscle force and hip joint position can affect the magnitude of anterior joint force and thus possibly lead to excessive force and injury. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of hip joint position and of weakness of the gluteal and iliopsoas muscles on anterior hip joint force. We used a musculoskeletal model to estimate hip joint forces during simulated prone hip extension and supine hip flexion under four different muscle force conditions and across a range of hip extension and flexion positions. Weakness of specified muscles was simulated by decreasing the modeled maximum force value for the gluteal muscles during hip extension and the iliopsoas muscle during hip flexion. We found that decreased force contribution from the gluteal muscles during hip extension and the iliopsoas muscle during hip flexion resulted in an increase in the anterior hip joint force. The anterior hip joint force was greater when the hip was in extension than when the hip was in flexion. Further studies are warranted to determine if increased utilization of the gluteal muscles during hip extension and of the iliopsoas muscle during hip flexion, and avoidance of hip extension beyond neutral would be beneficial for people with anterior hip pain, subtle hip instability, or an anterior acetabular labral tear.     

Effect of hip joint angle at seat-off on hip joint contact force during sit-to-stand movement: a computer simulation study

Background

Sit-to-stand movements are a necessary part of daily life, and excessive mechanical stress on the articular cartilage has been reported to encourage the progression of osteoarthritis. Although a change in hip joint angle at seat-off may affect hip joint contact force during a sit-to-stand movement, the effect is unclear. This study aimed to examine the effect of the hip joint angle at seat-off on the hip joint contact force during a sit-to-stand movement by using a computer simulation.

Methods

A musculoskeletal model was created for the computer simulation, and eight muscles were attached to each lower limb. Various sit-to-stand movements were generated using parameters (e.g., seat height and time from seat-off to standing posture) reported by previous studies. The hip joint contact force for each sit-to-stand movement was calculated. Furthermore, the effect of the hip joint angle at seat-off on the hip joint contact force during the sit-to-stand movement was examined. In this study, as the changes to the musculoskeletal model parameters affect the hip joint contact force, a sensitivity analysis was conducted.

Results and conclusions

The hip joint contact force during the sit-to-stand movement increased approximately linearly as the hip flexion angle at the seat-off increased. Moreover, the normal sit-to-stand movement and the sit-to-stand movement yielding a minimum hip joint contact force were approximately equivalent. The effect of the changes to the musculoskeletal model parameters on the main findings of this study was minimal. Thus, the main findings are robust and may help prevent the progression of hip osteoarthritis by decreasing mechanical stress, which will be explored in future studies.

     

A method of calculating physiologically relevant joint reaction forces during forward dynamic simulations of movement from an existing knee model

In the commonly used SIMM software, which includes a complete musculoskeletal model of the lower limbs, the reaction forces at the knee are computed. These reaction forces represent the bone-on-bone contact forces and the soft tissue forces (e.g. ligaments) other than muscles acting at the joint. In the knee model integrated into this software, a patellotibial joint rather than a patellofemoral joint is defined, and a force acting along the direction of the patellar ligament is not included. Although this knee model results in valid kinematics and muscle moment arms, the reaction forces at the knee calculated do not represent physiologic knee joint reaction forces. Hence our objectives were to develop a method of calculating physiologic knee joint reaction forces using the knee model incorporated into the SIMM software and to demonstrate the differences in the forces returned by SIMM and the physiologic forces in an example. Our method converts the anatomically fictional patellotibial joint into a patellofemoral joint and computes the force in an inextensible patellar ligament. In our example, the rectus femoris was fully excited isometrically, with the knee and hip flexed to 90 degrees . The resulting SIMM tibiofemoral joint reaction force was primarily shear, because the quadriceps force was applied to the tibia via the fictional patellotibial joint. In contrast the physiologic tibiofemoral joint reaction force was primarily compression, because the quadriceps force was applied through the patellar ligament. This result illustrates that the physiologic knee joint reaction forces are profoundly different than the forces returned by SIMM. However physiologic knee joint reaction forces can be computed with postprocessing of SIMM results.     

The effects of the antagonist muscle force on intersegmental loading during isokinetic efforts of the knee extensors

Hamstrings activation when acting as antagonists is considered very important for knee joint stability. However, the effect of hamstring antagonist activity on knee joint loading in vivo is not clear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the differences in antagonistic muscle force and their effect on agonist muscle and intersegmental forces during isokinetic eccentric and concentric efforts of the knee extensors. Ten males performed maximum isokinetic eccentric and concentric efforts of the knee extensors at 30 degrees s(-1). The muscular and tibiofemoral joint forces were then estimated using a two-dimensional model with and without including the antagonist muscle forces. The antagonist moment was predicted using an IEMG-moment model. The predicted antagonist force reached a maximum of 2.55 times body weight (BW) and 1.16 BW under concentric and eccentric conditions respectively. Paired t-tests indicated that these were significantly different (p<0.05). A one-way analysis of variance indicated that when antagonist forces are included in the calculations the patella tendon, compressive and posterior shear joint forces are significantly higher compared to those calculated without including the antagonist forces. The anterior shear force was not affected by antagonist activity. The antagonists produce considerable force throughout the range of motion and affect the joint forces exerted at the knee joint. Further, it appears that the antagonist effect depends on the type of muscle action examined as it is higher during concentric compared to eccentric efforts of the knee extensors.     

The effect of finger extensor mechanism on the flexor force during isometric tasks.

The role of the intrinsic finger flexor muscles was investigated during finger flexion tasks. A suspension system was used to measure isometric finger forces when the point of force application varied along fingers in a distal-proximal direction. Two biomechanical models, with consideration of extensor mechanism Extensor Mechanism Model (EMM) and without consideration of extensor mechanism Flexor Model (FM), were used to calculate forces of extrinsic and intrinsic finger flexors. When the point of force application was at the distal phalanx, the extrinsic flexor muscles flexor digitorum profundus, FDP, and flexor digitorum superficialis, FDS, accounted for over 80% of the summed force of all flexors, and therefore were the major contributors to the joint flexion at the distal interphalangeal (DIP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. When the point of force application was at the DIP joint, the FDS accounted for more than 70% of the total force of all flexors, and was the major contributor to the PIP and MCP joint flexion. When the force of application was at the PIP joint, the intrinsic muscle group was the major contributor for MCP flexion, accounting for more than 70% of the combined force of all flexors. The results suggest that the effects of the extensor mechanism on the flexors are relatively small when the location of force application is distal to the PIP joint. When the external force is applied proximally to the PIP joint, the extensor mechanism has large influence on force production of all flexors. The current study provides an experimental protocol and biomechanical models that allow estimation of the effects of extensor mechanism on both the extrinsic and intrinsic flexors in various loading conditions, as well as differentiating the contribution of the intrinsic and extrinsic finger flexors during isometric flexion.     

Individual muscle contributions to the axial knee joint contact force during normal walking

Muscles are significant contributors to the high joint forces developed in the knee during human walking. Not only do muscles contribute to the knee joint forces by acting to compress the joint, but they also develop joint forces indirectly through their contributions to the ground reaction forces via dynamic coupling. Thus, muscles can have significant contributions to forces at joints they do not span. However, few studies have investigated how the major lower-limb muscles contribute to the knee joint contact forces during walking. The goal of this study was to use a muscle-actuated forward dynamics simulation of walking to identify how individual muscles contribute to the axial tibio-femoral joint force. The simulation results showed that the vastii muscles are the primary contributors to the axial joint force in early stance while the gastrocnemius is the primary contributor in late stance. The tibio-femoral joint force generated by these muscles was at times greater than the muscle forces themselves. Muscles that do not cross the knee joint (e.g., the gluteus maximus and soleus) also have significant contributions to the tibio-femoral joint force through their contributions to the ground reaction forces. Further, small changes in walking kinematics (e.g., knee flexion angle) can have a significant effect on the magnitude of the knee joint forces. Thus, altering walking mechanics and muscle coordination patterns to utilize muscle groups that perform the same biomechanical function, yet contribute less to the knee joint forces may be an effective way to reduce knee joint loading during walking.     

Relation between the ankle joint angle and the maximum isometric force of the toe flexor muscles

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between the ankle joint angle and maximum isometric force of the toe flexor muscles. Toe flexor strength and electromyography activity of the foot muscles were measured in 12 healthy men at 6 different ankle joint angles with the knee joint at 90 deg in the sitting position. To measure the maximum isometric force of the toe flexor muscles, subjects exerted maximum force on a toe grip dynamometer while the activity levels of the intrinsic and extrinsic plantar muscles were measured. The relation between ankle joint angle and maximum isometric force of the toe flexor muscles was determined, and the isometric force exhibited a peak when the ankle joint was at 70–90 deg on average. From this optimal neutral position, the isometric force gradually decreased and reached its nadir in the plantar flexion position (i.e., 120 deg). The EMG activity of the abductor hallucis (intrinsic plantar muscle) and peroneus longus (extrinsic plantar muscle) did not differ at any ankle joint angles. The results of this study suggest that the force generation of toe flexor muscles is regulated at the ankle joint and that changes in the length-tension relations of the extrinsic plantar muscle could be a reason for the force-generating capacity at the metatarsophalangeal joint when the ankle joint angle is changed.     

Prediction of pedal forces in bicycling using optimization methods

The bicycle-rider system is modeled as a planar five-bar linkage with pedal forces and pedal dynamics as input. The pedal force profile input is varied, maintaining constant average bicycle power, in order to obtain the optimal pedal force profile that minimizes two cost functions. One cost function is based on joint moments and the other is based on muscle stresses. Predicted (optimal) pedal profiles as well as joint moment time histories are compared to representative real data to examine cost function appropriateness. Both cost functions offer reasonable predictions of pedal forces. The muscle stress cost function, however, better predicts joint moments. Predicted muscle activity also correlates well with myoelectric data. The factors that lead to effective (i.e. low cost) pedalling are examined. Pedalling effectiveness is found to be a complex function of pedal force vector orientation and muscle mechanics.     

Sensitivity of temporomandibular joint force calculations to errors in muscle force measurements

A two-dimensional, five-muscle model was used to determine the degree of precision required for accurate calculation of temporomandibular joint force magnitude and direction. The sensitivity of the calculations to each variable were assessed by incrementing each variable through its presumed biological range and were expressed as rate of change in the joint force per unit change in each variable. Sensitivity of the calculations to variables depends upon both bite force direction and bite position. The bite force direction with maximum precision for joint force magnitude produced minimal precision for joint force direction. The accuracy needed for each muscle force varied greatly. The effect of error for each muscle parameter depended upon the magnitude, direction, and moment arm length of the muscle force relative to those of the resultant muscle force. If each of the five muscle forces was known to the nearest 1% of total muscle force magnitude, 1 degree of muscle force direction, and 1 mm of moment arm length, temporomandibular joint force magnitude could be calculated to the nearest 4 kg and joint force direction to the nearest 7 degrees. It is not known whether this precision for the muscle forces is possible.     

Effects of Forefoot Shoe on Knee and Ankle Loading during Running in Male Recreational Runners

Objectives: Although overuse running injury risks for the ankle and knee are high, the effect of different shoe designs on Achilles tendon force (ATF) and Patellofemoral joint contact force (PTF) loading rates are unclear. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to compare the ATF at the ankle and the PTF and Patellofemoral joint stress force (PP) at the knee using different running shoe designs (forefoot shoes vs. normal shoes). Methods: Fourteen healthy recreational male runners were recruited to run over a force plate under two shoe conditions (forefoot shoes vs. normal shoes). Sagittal plane ankle and knee kinematics and ground reaction forces were simultaneously recorded. Ankle joint mechanics (ankle joint angle, velocity, moment and power) and the ATF were calculated. Knee joint mechanics (knee joint angle velocity, moment and power) and the PTF and PP were also calculated. Results: No significant differences were observed in the PTF, ankle plantarflexion angle, ankle dorsiflexion power, peak vertical active force, contact time and PTF between the two shoe conditions. Compared to wearing normal shoes, wearing the forefoot shoes demonstrated that the ankle dorsiflexion angle, knee flexion velocity, ankle dorsiflexion moment extension, knee extension moment, knee extension power, knee flexion power and the peak patellofemoral contact stress were significantly reduced. However, the ankle dorsiflexion velocity, ankle plantarflexion velocity, ankle plantarflexion moment and Achilles tendons force increased significantly. Conclusions: These findings suggest that wearing forefoot shoes significantly decreases the patellofemoral joint stress by reducing the moment of knee extension, however the shoes increased the ankle plantarflexion moment and ATF force. The forefoot shoes effectively reduced the load on the patellofemoral joint during the stance phase of running. However, it is not recommended for new and novice runners and patients with Achilles tendon injuries to wear forefoot shoes.     

Estimation of the effective static moment arms of the tendons in the index finger extensor mechanism

A novel technique to estimate the contribution of finger extensor tendons to joint moment generation was proposed. Effective static moment arms (ESMAs), which represent the net effects of the tendon force on joint moments in static finger postures, were estimated for the 4 degrees of freedom (DOFs) in the index finger. Specifically, the ESMAs for the five tendons contributing to the finger extensor apparatus were estimated by directly correlating the applied tendon force to the measured resultant joint moments in cadaveric hand specimens. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that the finger posture, specifically interphalangeal joint angles, had significant effects on the measured ESMA values in 7 out of 20 conditions (four DOFs for each of the five muscles). Extensor digitorum communis and extensor indicis proprius tendons were found to have greater MCP ESMA values when IP joints are flexed, whereas abduction ESMAs of all muscles except extensor digitorum profundus were mainly affected by MCP flexion. The ESMAs were generally smaller than the moment arms estimated in previous studies that employed kinematic measurement techniques. Tendon force distribution within the extensor hood and dissipation into adjacent structures are believed to contribute to the joint moment reductions, which result in smaller ESMA values.     

Estimating in vivo passive forces of the index finger muscles: Exploring model parameters

We compared predicted passive finger joint torques from a biomechanical model that includes the exponential passive muscle force–length relationship documented in the literature with finger joint torques estimated from measures in ten adult volunteers. The estimated finger joint torques were calculated from measured right index fingertip force, joint postures, and anthropometry across 18 finger and wrist postures with the forearm muscles relaxed. The biomechanical model predicting passive finger joint torques included three extrinsic and three intrinsic finger muscles. The values for the predicted passive joint torques were much larger than the values calculated from the fingertip force and posture measures with an average RMS error of 7.6 N cm. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the predicted joint torques were most sensitive to passive force–length model parameters compared to anthropometric and postural parameters. Using Monte Carlo simulation, we determined a new set of values for the passive force–length model parameters that reduced the differences between the joint torques calculated from the two methods to an average RMS value of 0.5 N cm, a 94% average improvement of error from the torques predicted using the existing data. These new parameter values did vary across individuals; however, using an average set for the parameter values across subjects still reduced the average RMS difference to 0.8 N cm. These new parameters may improve dynamic modeling of the finger during sub-maximal force activities and are based on in vivo data rather than traditional in vitro data.     

Trunk muscle activation and associated lumbar spine joint shear forces under different levels of external forward force applied to the trunk.

High anterior intervertebral shear loads could cause low back injuries and therefore the neuromuscular system may actively counteract these forces. This study investigated whether, under constant moment loading relative to L3L4, an increased externally applied forward force on the trunk results in a shift in muscle activation towards the use of muscles with more backward directed lines of action, thereby reducing the increase in total joint shear force. Twelve participants isometrically resisted forward forces, applied at several locations on the trunk, while moments were held constant relative to L3L4. Surface EMG and lumbar curvature were measured, and an EMG-driven muscle model was used to calculate compression and shear forces at all lumbar intervertebral joints. Larger externally applied forward forces resulted in a flattening of the lumbar lordosis and a slightly more backward directed muscle force. Furthermore, the overall muscle activation increased. At the T12L1 to L3L4 joint, resulting joint shear forces remained small (less than 200N) because the average muscle force pulled backward relative to those joints. However, at the L5S1 joint the average muscle force pulled the trunk forward so that the increase in muscle force with increasing externally applied forward force caused a further rise in shear force (by 102.1N, SD=104.0N), resulting in a joint shear force of 1080.1N (SD=150.4N) at 50Nm moment loading. It is concluded that the response of the neuromuscular system to shear force challenges tends to increase rather than reduce the shear loading at the lumbar joint that is subjected to the highest shear forces.     

Knee joint reaction force during tibial diaphyseal lengthening: a study on a rabbit model

The in vivo passive knee joint reaction force was measured in a rabbit model of tibial diaphyseal lengthening. This was based on the assumption that limb lengthening creates soft tissue tension that compresses the joint surface and generates the joint contact force. A measurement method was developed that involved the distraction of the joint and the determination of the distraction force that just separates the joint surfaces. Sixteen immature (mean+/-SD age=9+/-0.6 weeks) New Zealand White rabbits underwent 30% (left) tibial diaphyseal lengthening at a rate of two 0.4mm incremental lengthenings per day. The knee joint reaction force was measured at the end of lengthening (8 rabbits, mean+/-SD age=14+/-0.6 weeks) and five weeks after lengthening (8 rabbits, mean+/-SD age=19+/-0.7 weeks). An instrumented bilateral distractor and an extensometer were fixed cross the knee joint. The joint distraction force and distraction displacement were measured when the joint was distracted in steps and after the section of the Achilles tendon. The joint reaction force on the lengthened side was significantly higher than the control side at both time points (mean+/-SD 44.4+/-7.8 N v. 27.2+/-4.0 N at the end of lengthening, 44.3+/-S6.5 N v. 31.3+/-3.0 N at 5 weeks after lengthening). The contribution of the gastrocnemius to the joint reaction force on the lengthened side was also significantly higher than the control side at both time points (mean+/-SD 9.0+/-1.3N v. 2.8+/-0.8 N at the end of lengthening, 5.3+/-1.4N v. 2.7+/-0.5N at 5 weeks after lengthening). There were significant knee and ankle joint contractures at the end of lengthening, as evidenced by decreased range of motion (mean+/-SD 27+/-8 degrees and 36+/-13 degrees, respectively), which remained 5 weeks after lengthening (mean+/-SD 26+/-6 degrees and 35+/-8 degrees, respectively). The gastrocnemius contributed about 20% of the joint reaction force, indicating that changes in the other intra- and extra-articular structures due to joint contracture may be more important in generating the joint reaction force.     

Forces acting on the patella during maximal voluntary contraction of the quadriceps femoris muscle at different knee flexion/extension angles

From knee extension moments measured with a dynamometer, the quadriceps muscle force, the patellar ligament force and the reaction force in the patellofemoral joint at various knee angles (0-90 degrees) were estimated. The information needed to calculate the combined effect of both patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint on the mechanical advantage of the muscle was obtained from lateral-view radiographs of autopsy knees. The results show that the smallest quadriceps force (2,000 N) is exerted at maximal extension, and the largest force (8,000 N) at about 75 degrees of flexion. The patellar ligament force reaches a maximum (5,000 N) at 60 degrees. The reaction force in the patellofemoral joint is the smallest (1,000 N) at extension and is of the same values as the muscle force in a range from 75 to 90 degrees. Especially at large flexion angles, the value of the estimated forces is considerably larger (by 100%) than reported in the literature. This difference is attributed to the influence of the patellofemoral joint on the mechanical advantage of the muscle, which has not been taken into account in other studies.     

Role of gastrocnemius activation in knee joint biomechanics: gastrocnemius acts as an ACL antagonist

Gastrocnemius is a premier muscle crossing the knee, but its role in knee biomechanics and on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remains less clear when compared to hamstrings and quadriceps. The effect of changes in gastrocnemius force at late stance when it peaks on the knee joint response and ACL force was initially investigated using a lower extremity musculoskeletal model driven by gait kinematics—kinetics. The tibiofemoral joint under isolated isometric contraction of gastrocnemius was subsequently analyzed at different force levels and flexion angles (0°–90°). Changes in gastrocnemius force at late stance markedly influenced hamstrings forces. Gastrocnemius acted as ACL antagonist by substantially increasing its force. Simulations under isolated contraction of gastrocnemius confirmed this role at all flexion angles, in particular, at extreme knee flexion angles (0° and 90°). Constraint on varus/valgus rotations substantially decreased this effect. Although hamstrings and gastrocnemius are both knee joint flexors, they play opposite roles in respectively protecting or loading ACL. Although the quadriceps is also recognized as antagonist of ACL, at larger joint flexion and in contrast to quadriceps, activity in gastrocnemius substantially increased ACL forces (anteromedial bundle). The fact that gastrocnemius is an antagonist of ACL should help in effective prevention and management of ACL injuries.     

Theoretical requirements for the interpretation of signals of intramuscular tension

A model of a simple hinge joint is developed which allows the expression of intramuscular tension in terms of the angle at the joint and an applied force. A particular intramuscular tension does not specify uniquely the size of the force applied to a limb. For the nervous system to use signals of intramuscular tension from the agonist muscle to specify the applied force it requires information about (i) the angle at the joint, (ii) the angle between the line of applied force and the line of muscular contraction, and (iii) the relation between the axis of joint rotation and gravity.Sensory information about intramuscular tension can be perceived. This theoretical anlysis shows that central processing of signals of intramuscular tension may be required to provide a unique indicator of the external forces on a limb.