Relations of the semi-persistent viruses, parsnip yellow fleck and anthriscus yellows, with their vector, Cav arietta aegopodii

Studies were made of the relations of parsnip yellow fleck virus (PYFV) and its helper virus, anthriscus yellows (AYV), with their aphid vector, Cavariella aegopodii. Apterous insects were more efficient vectors than alates; apterous nymphs were as efficient as apterous adults. C. aegopodii never transmitted PYFV in the absence of AYV, but aphids carrying both viruses infected some test plants with one or other virus alone. C. aegopodii that fed first on a source of AYV and then on a source of PYFV transmitted both viruses to test plants, but aphids that fed on the sources in the reverse order transmitted only AYV. Test plants receiving some aphids from a source of AYV, and others from a source of PYFV, became infected only with AYV. C. aegopodii acquired AYV or the AYV/PYFV complex from plants in a minimum acquisition access time (AAT) of 10–15 mm and inoculated the viruses to test plants in a minimum inoculation access time (IAT) of 2 min. Increasing either AAT or IAT, or both, to 1 h or longer increased the frequency of transmission of each virus. Starving the insects before the acquisition feed on AYV or AYV/PFYV sources did not affect transmission. Aphids already carrying AYV acquired PYFV from plants in a minimum AAT of only 2 min; they acquired and inoculated PYFV in a minimum total time of 12 min. The data suggest that AYV is confined to deeply lying tissues whereas PYFV is distributed throughout the leaf. C. aegopodii transmitted both PYFV and AYV in a semi-persistent manner: the aphids retained both viruses for up to 4 days but lost them on moulting. Neither virus was passed to progeny of viruliferous adults. Earlier results suggesting that AYV is a persistent virus may have been caused by contamination of the AYV culture with carrot red leaf virus.     

The role of the helper virus, anthriscus yellows, in the transmission of parsnip yellow fleck virus by the aphid Cavariella aegopodii

Transmission of parsnip yellow fleck virus (PYFV) by the aphid Cavariella aegopodii occurs only when the aphids are also carrying the helper virus, anthriscus yellows (AYV). None of five other viruses tested was able to act as helper. In experiments in which aphids were allowed to feed through membranes on crude or treated extracts from infected plants, aphids already carrying AYV acquired PYFV, but virus-free aphids failed to acquire either AYV or PYFV. PYFV was not transmitted by insects injected with haemolymph from aphids carrying both viruses, or with purified preparations of PYFV. PYFV was transmitted when AYV-carrying aphids, except those whose stylets had been removed, were contaminated externally with PYFV preparations. Ultraviolet irradiation of infected leaves did not prevent aphids from acquiring AYV, presumably because it is confined to deeply-lying tissues. AYV-carrying aphids could acquire PYFV from u.v.-irradiated leaves after acquisition access times of 2 h but not after feeds of only 2 or 15 min (which are adequate on unirradiated leaves), suggesting that PYFV is present in all parts of the leaf. No ‘helper agent’ distinct from AYV itself was detected in these experiments or in experiments on minimum acquisition feeding time or maximum period of persistence in the aphid. U.v.-inactivated PYFV competed with infective PYFV for retention sites in AYV-carrying aphids, whereas AYV apparently did not. It is suggested that there is no helper agent for PYFV, other than AYV particles. The possibility that there is one for AYV is not excluded.     

Transmission and differentiation of six viruses infecting hogweed (Heracleum sphondylium) in Scotland

Six viruses, code-named HV1-HV6, were transmitted manually and/or by aphids (Cavariella spp. from symptomless wild plants of hogweed (Heracleum sphondylium) in Scotland. HV1 was identified as parsnip yellow fleck virus (PYFV); anthriscus yellows virus, on which it depends for transmission by aphids, was presumably also present in the hogweed plants. HV2 was transmitted manually and by aphids and had very flexuous filamentous particles c. 700–750 nm long; it has affinities with the closteroviruses, and the name heracleum latent virus is proposed. HV3, HV4 and HV5 were transmitted manually, HV3 and HV5 also by aphids, but their particle morphology is unknown. HV6 was transmitted only by aphids and has very flexuous particles up to 1400 nm long; it is presumably a closterovirus distinct from HV2. All the viruses infected cultivated umbelliferous species experimentally but only PYFV is known to infect umbelliferous crops.     

Relations of carrot red leaf and carrot mottle viruses with their aphid vector, Cavariella aegopodii

Studies with Scottish isolates of carrot red leaf (CRLV) and carrot mottle (CMotV) viruses confirmed the dependency of CMotV on CRLV for transmission by the aphid Cavariella aegopodii. CMotV was transmitted by aphids only when the two viruses were present in the same source plant, and its transmission was not assisted by anthriscus yellows virus, which acts as a helper for parsnip yellow fleck virus. Some test plants became infected with CRLV alone, and a few with CMotV alone. In winter, aphid transmission of CRLV and CMotV was greatly increased when the source plants received supplementary lighting whereas the CMotV infectivity of sap was not increased. C. aegopodii acquired CRLV and CMotV after minimum acquisition access times of 30 min and inoculated them after minimum inoculation access times of 2 min. There was a minimum latent period of 7–18 h. The viruses were retained by the aphid after moulting and are therefore circulative in the vector, but were not transmitted to progeny insects. Aphids allowed 24 h to acquire the viruses continued to transmit them for at least 12 days, but some aphids allowed 6 h or less for virus acquisition ceased to transmit after 3 or 4 days. CRLV is considered a tentative member of the luteovirus group.     

Host ranges and serological properties of eight isolates of parsnip yellow fleck virus belonging to the two major serotypes

Isolates of parsnip yellow fleck virus (PYFV) from parsnip (P-121), celery (CV506 and CV065) and Heracleum sphondylium (Hs2) were serologically close to each other but distant from isolates from carrot (Dc2 and Dc5) and Anthriscus sylvestris (A-421 and As2), which were in turn close to each other serologically. The two groups of isolates also differed from each other in host range. Minor differences in immunological reactions and in host range and symptomatology were observed between isolates in each group. Particles of all eight isolates had similar RNA and protein compositions. The data confirm that PYFV isolates fall into two major serotypes, those from parsnip, celery and H. sphondylium belonging to the P-121 serotype and those from carrot and A. sylvestris belonging to the A-421 serotype.     

Purification and some particle properties of anthriscus yellows virus, a phloem-limited semi-persistent aphid-borne virus

Anthriscus yellows virus (AYV), a phloem-limited virus transmitted in the semi-persistent manner by the aphid Cavariella aegopodii, was purified by treatment of leaf extracts with cellulasc, followed by differential and sucrose density gradient centrifugation. ‘The preparations contained isometric particles c. 29 nm in diameter which were unstable unless stored in buffer at pH 8.0 containing 1 mM CaCl₂,. The particles sedimented as two components, ’full‘ nucleoprotein particles with A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀= 1.83 containing about 42% nucleic acid, and ’empty‘ protein shells with A₂₆₀,/A₂₈₀= 0.73; their buoyant densities in CsCl solutions were 1.52 and 1.27 g/cm³. Respectively. Yields of ihe nircleoprotein particles were c. 1.75 mg/kg leaf tissue. The particles contained a single species of RNA, of mol. wt 3.6 × 10 “(10 000 nucleotides). Particle protein preparations contained four electrophoretic species, of mol. wt (× 10³) 35.0, 28.3, 23.3 and 22.3.C. aegopodii did not transmit AYV from purified preparations. A rabbit injected with AYV preparations produced antibodies that coated AYV particles in electron microscope tests, but gave variable reactions in immunosorbent electron microscopy (ISEM), depending on the composition of the medium. No reactions were obtained in enzyme-linked inimunosorbent asjay (ELISA). No serological relationship was detected in ISEM between AYV and any of 10 viruses that resembled it in one or more properties.     

Parsnip mosaic virus, a new member of the potato virus Y group

Parsnip mosaic virus (PMV) occurs commonly in parsnip in Britain and is transmitted after acquisition access periods of 2–5 min by the aphids Cavariella aegopodii, C. theobaldi and Myzus persicae. It was transmitted by manual inoculation of sap, infecting parsnip, chervil, coriander and carrot plants systemically, and causing local lesions without subsequent systemic infection in eight Chenopodium spp., Spinacia oleracea, Gomphrena globosa, and Toreniafournieri. It lost infectivity in Chenopodium quinoa sap after dilution to 10^-3–10^-4, heating for 10 min at 55–58 °C, or storage at room temperature for 7–10 days. Preparations partially purified by n-butanol or chloroform clarification, followed by acid precipitation and/or chromatography on columns of 2% agarose beads, contained filamentous particles, many of which were aggregated or fragmented. Preparations made with chloroform and without acid precipitation contained unaggregated particles of 755 nm normal length, with a sedimentation coefficient of 149 S. PMV did not react with antisera to any of fourteen other viruses with filamentous particles. The present cryptogram for PMV is */*: */*:E/E:S/Ap.     

Host range, purification and serological properties of heracleum latent virus

Heracleum latent virus (HLV occurs commonly in wild plants of Heracleum sphondylium (hogweed) in Scotland without causing symptoms. It was transmitted manually or by aphids (Cavariella aegopodii, C. pastinacae or C. theobaldi) to 37 of 105 species in 11 of 18 families (especially to members of the Amaranthaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Solanaceae and Umbelliferae), but was not transmitted through seed of four species tested. It has very flexuous filamentous particles c. 730 × 12 nm in phosphotungstate, with obvious cross-banding of pitch 3–8 nm. Leaf extracts lost infectivity after 1–2 days at 22°C, 10 min at 40–50°C and after dilution 10^-4-10^-5. Infectivity in leaf extracts was not stabilised by addition of Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺ or Ni²⁺, but was abolished by EDTA. HLV was purified by bentonite clarification, precipitation with polyethylene glycol (mol. wt 6000), and differential centrifugation. Its properties resemble those of the tentative closterovirus, apple chlorotic leaf spot (ACLSV), but no serological relationship was detected to this or to any of 18 other filamentous viruses, including six definitive closteroviruses. No cross-protection was observed between HLV, ACLSV and apple stem grooving virus.     

Further evidence on the nature of the dependence of carrot mottle virus on carrot red leaf virus for transmission by aphids

Preparations were made from chervil plants doubly infected with carrot mottle virus (CMotV) and its helper virus, carrot red leaf (CRLV), on which it depends for transmission by the aphid Cavariella aegopodii, by the procedure developed previously for CRLV. The preparations contained 25 nm isometric particles which were indistinguishable from those of CRLV but possessed aphid-transmissible infectivity of both viruses and manually transmissible infectivity of CMotV. Only one sedimenting and buoyant density component was detected. The manually transmissible CMotV infectivity was resistant to freezing and to organic solvents, treatments that destroyed the CMotV infectivity in extracts from singly infected plants. The aphid-transmissible CMotV infectivity in preparations from CRLV/ CMotV-infected plants, and that in extracts from CRLV/CMotV-carrying C. aegopodii, was abolished by treatment with CRLV antiserum but not with normal serum. These results show that transmission of CMotV by C. aegopodii is dependent on the packaging of its RNA in coats composed partially or entirely of CRLV particle protein. The aphid Myzus persicae does not transmit CRLV or CMotV from plants mixedly or singly infected with these viruses but it is a vector of beet western yellows virus (BWYV) and potato leafroll virus (PLRV) and it transmitted CMotV from plants that also contained either of these viruses. This suggests that the coat proteins of BWYV and PLRV can substitute for that of CRLV in packaging CMotV nucleic acid and thereby confer on it their own vector specificities.     

Host range and some properties of groundnut rosette virus

Two isolates of groundnut rosette virus from East Africa (GRVE₁ and GRVE₂) and from West Africa (GRVW₁ and GRVW₂) were transmitted by Aphis craccivora obtained from West Africa. A third isolate from West Africa (GRVW₃) was not transmitted by A. craccivora from three widely separated sources. GRVW₁, GRVW₂ and GRVW₃ caused leaf-symptoms in groundnut of a mosaic pattern in light and dark green. GRVE₁ and GRVE₂ caused chlorosis or chlorosis and leaf distortion as well as mosaic symptoms. Groundnut plants with GRVW₁ could not be infected by means of aphids with GRVE₁, and GRVE₁ gave similar protection against GRVW₁, which suggests that they are strains of the same virus. All isolates were transmissible manually from groundnut to groundnut (Arachis hypogea), Trifolium incarnatum and T. repens, and caused systemic infection. Inoculated Nicotiana clevelandii and N. rustica developed symptoms but virus could not be recovered from them. Chenopodium amaranticolor, C. hybridum and C. quinoa showed local lesions on inoculated leaves. Virus could be acquired by aphids from groundnut or Trifolium repens infected by means of aphids, but not from those infected by manual inoculation. Virus could not be recovered from T. incarnatum manually or by aphids, but was transmitted by cleft-grafting from clover to groundnut. Saps extracted in borax buffer plus zinc sulphate at pH 9 from plants infected with GRVW₁ and GRVE₁ remained infective at 18° C. for 1 week, and at — 20° C. for up to 4 weeks. Virus could be recovered from frozen leaves. Buffered saps lost infectivity when heated above 50° C. for 10 min.; most were still infective when diluted 1/10 and some at 1/100. Electron micrographs of partially purified preparations contained spherical particles 25–28 mμ in diameter. There were usually only about five per microscope field and they resembled those of some other viruses.     

Factors affecting aphid acquisition and transmission of soybean mosaic virus

Myzus persicae transmitted soybean mosaic virus (SMV) most efficiently following 30 or 60 s acquisition probes on infected plants. There were no differences in susceptibility to SMV infection of soybean plants 1 to 12 wk old, but symptoms were more severe in plants inoculated when young than when old. Soybeans inoculated between developmental stages R3 and R6 only showed yellowish-brown blotching on one or more leaves. There were no observable differences in the time of appearance or type of symptoms shown by soybean seedlings inoculated either by sap or by aphids; infected plants became acquisition hosts for aphids 5–6 days after inoculation. There was no change in the efficiency with which M. persicae transmitted SMV from source plants up to 18 wk after inoculation. M. persicae transmitted SMV from leaves of field-grown soybeans when plants were inoculated at developmental stages V6, R2, and R3 and tested as sources 57–74 days after inoculation but not from plants inoculated at R5 and tested as sources 14 to 32 days after inoculation. M. persicae acquired SMV from soybean buds, flowers, green bean pods, and unifoliolate, trifoliolate, and senescent leaves. Middle-aged and deformed leaves were better sources of the virus than buds, unfolding and old symptomless leaves. The results are being incorporated into a computer model of SMV epidemiology.     

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HOST PLANTS OF POTATO VIRUS C IN DETERMINING ITS TRANSMISSION BY APHIDS

A stock of potato virus C derived from Edgecote Purple potatoes in 1945 was not then transmitted by aphids, although more than 2000 aphids were used in conditions optimal for transmitting the serologically related potato virus Y. This stock of virus C has been propagated continuously since, by manual inoculation in a series of Nicotiana glutinosa and N. tabacum , and in 1955 it was transmitted by the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulz.): about one in twenty of the aphids transmitted it compared with one in two for potato virus Y.
Virus C derived from the Edgecote Purple potatoes in 1955 was not transmitted by aphids; both stocks of virus C produced only local lesions in Majestic potato leaves, and gave similar symptoms in tobacco.
When inoculated to Majestic potatoes and then returned to tobacco plants, potato virus C usually ceased to be aphid transmitted and did not recover this property in any of the subsequent subcultures.
Transmission from stock by aphids did not isolate a strain of virus C which was any more readily transmitted by aphids, indeed, for the first two or three subcultures, aphids usually transmitted more readily from plants inoculated manually. But the few isolates which remained aphid transmissible, after a second passage through potato, were rather readily transmitted.
These results suggest that the ability of a virus to be aphid transmitted is, at least in part, determined by the host plant in which it is multiplying, but the nature of the changes which determine this ability are unknown.     

Transmission characteristics and some other properties of bean yellow vein-banding virus, and its association with pea enation

Bean yellow vein-banding virus (BYVBV) has been found occasionally in mixed infection with pea enation mosaic virus (PEMV) in spring-sown field beans (Vicia faba minor) in southern England. Glasshouse tests confirmed that, like PEMV, BYVBV is transmissible by manual inoculation and by aphids in the persistent manner. However, BYVBV can be transmitted by aphids only from plants that are also infected with a helper virus, usually PEMV. Thus after separation from PEMV by passage through Phaseolus vulgaris it was no longer aphid-transmissible. It became aphid-transmissible again only after re-mixing in plants with PEMV or with a substitute helper, bean leaf roll virus (BLRV). It was not transmitted by aphids that fed sequentially on plants singly infected with PEMV and BYVBV. Thus the interaction between BYVBV and PEMV (or BLRV) that enables BYVBV to be transmitted by aphids seems to occur only in doubly infected plants. However, it was not transmitted by aphids from plants doubly infected with BYVBV and broad bean wilt virus (BBWV). BYVBV and PEMV were transmitted more readily by Acyrthosiphon pisum than by Myzus persicae; neither virus was transmitted by Aphis fabae. Phenol extracts of BYVBV-infected leaves were more infective than phosphate buffer or bentonite-clarified extracts and were sometimes infective when diluted to 1/1000. The infectivity of BYVBV in phosphate buffer extracts of leaves singly infected with BYVBV, unlike that in extracts of leaves doubly infected with BYVBV and PEMV (or BLRV), was destroyed by treatment with organic solvents. BYVBV infected 11 of 28 plant species that were inoculated with phenol extracts; seven of the infected species were legumes. No transmission of BYVBV was detected through seed harvested from infected field bean plants. Isometric particles c. 30 nm in diameter were seen in extracts of plants doubly infected with BYVBV and PEMV but not in extracts of plants infected with BYVBV alone. Leaves of plants infected with BYVBV, alone or with PEMV, contained membrane-bound structures c. 50–90 nm in diameter associated with the tonoplast in cell vacuoles. These structures were not found in healthy leaves. BYVBV has several properties in common with other known aphid-borne viruses that are helper-dependent and transmitted in a persistent manner. Possibly, as suggested for some of them, aphid transmission of BYVBV depends on the coating of its nucleic acid with helper virus coat protein.     

Tobacco yellow vein,a virus dependent on assistor viruses for its transmission by aphids*

Tobacco yellow vein, a disease found in Malawi, is caused by a combination of two viruses transmitted in the persistent manner by aphids. One component, tobacco yellow vein virus (TYVV) is manually transmissible, but aphids transmit it only from plants also containing the other (assistor) component, which is not manually transmissible. Aphids also transmit TYVV from plants containing either of two other assistor viruses - tobacco vein-distorting and groundnut rosette assistor. A virulent isolate of TYVV infected Soja max, Arachis hypogaea and several solanaceous species. It infected plants already containing tobacco mottle or groundnut rosette viruses but not those containing a mild isolate of TYVV.     

Particle properties of parsnip yellow fleck virus

Particle preparations of parsnip yellow fleck virus (PYFV) isolates A-421 and P-121, representing the two major serotypes, were made by clarifying leal extracts with ether or butan-1-ol and concentrating the virus particles by precipitation with polyethylene glycol and differential centrifugation. The preparations contained c. 31 nm-diameter particles comprising two sedimenting components. Top component (T) consisted of stain-penetrable protein shells with A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀= 0.8–0.9, sedimentation coefficient (S₂₀) = 56 S (A-421) or 60 S (P-121), and buoyant density = 1.297 g/cm³. Bottom component (B) consisted of nucleoprotein particles, not penetrable by negative stain, with A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀= 1.9, sedimentation coefficient (S⁰_20.w) = 148 S (A-421) or 153 S (P-121), and buoyant density = 1.520 g/cm³ (A-421) or 1.490 g/cm³ (P-121). Yields of B component particles were up to c. 1 mg/100 g leaf tissue (both isolates); yields of T component particles were up to c. 0.6 mg (A-421) or 5.5 mg (P-121) per 100 g leaf tissue. PYFV particles were found to contain a single RNA species (mol. wt c. 3.4 × 10⁶, c. 9800 nucleotides), constituting 40% of the particle weight, and three polypeptide species, of mol. wt (× 10 ³) 30 , 26 and 24 (A-421) or 31 , 26 and 23 (P-121).     

Studies on the Relationship of Urdbean Leaf Crinkle Virus and its Vectors, Aphis craccivora and Acyrthosiphon pisum

Pre and Post-virus-acquisition starvation of Aphis craccivora Koch, and Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris resulted in appreciable increase in percentage of transmission of urdbean leaf crinkle virus. Highest transmission occured when aphids were starved for 90 min prior to virus-acquisition. A. pisum and A. craccivora on 20 and 80 min of post-acquisition starvation and 10 and 20 min of virus-acquisition, respectively inoculated more number of plants. Both the aphids transmitted the virus in probes lasting for one min. However, beyond 5 min of successive transfer on test plants loss in transmissibility was apparent. Viruliferous aphid off the plant retained the virus for a much longer period than on maize plant. The virus appears to be non-persistently borne in the aphids.     

Virus-like particles in phloem tissue of chervil (Anthriscus cerefolium) infected with anthriscus yellows virus

Clusters of isometric virus-like particles c. 22 nm in diameter, embedded in amorphous electron-dense material, were found in the phloem tissue of Anthriscus cerefolium (chervil) plants infected with the semi-persistent aphid-borne virus, anthriscus yellows (AYV). The particles resembled those seen previously in thin sections of AYV-transmitting aphids (Cavariella aegopodii). The particles were found only in the central vascular bundle of the petiole and its continuation in the leaf midrib. They were also found in extracts made by grinding petiole and midrib tissue in 10 % sucrose using Carborundum. These results confirm earlier studies which suggest that AYV is confined to deeper-lying tissues.     

Acquisition and transmission of potato mop-to furovirus by a culture of Spongospora subterranea f.sp. subterranea derived from a single cystosorus

Potato mop-top virus (PMTV) was detected by ELISA in primary zoospores from four out of six isolates of Spongospora subterranea f.sp. subterranea. One virus-free isolate (N) of S. subterranea was used to acquire PMTV from potato roots and to transmit the virus to healthy plants. A mono-fungal culture of S. subterranea (isolate N) was derived by infecting tomato plant roots with a single cystosorus. The culture was used successfully to acquire PMTV from the roots of infected Nicotiana debneyi plants that had been manually inoculated with virus isolates, and subsequently to transmit the virus to healthy bait plants. These experiments confirm that S. subterranea is a vector of PMTV. Two PMTV isolates that had been maintained by manual inoculation for 19 and 21 passages were also acquired and transmitted by the fungus culture.     

Aphid-injection experiments with carrot mottle virus and its helper virus, carrot red leaf

Carrot mottle virus (CMotV) and its helper virus, carrot red leaf (CRLV), were not transmitted by aphids (Cavariella aegopodii) that had fed through membranes on, or had been injected with, sap from mixedly infected chervil plants or partially purified preparations of CMotV. However, the viruses were transmitted by recipient aphids injected with haemolymph from donor aphids that had fed on mixedly infected plants but not by a second series of recipients injected with haemolymph from the first series. Some of the first series of recipients transmitted both viruses for up to 11 days but others transmitted erratically and many lost ability to transmit after a few days. The results confirm that both viruses are circulative but provide no evidence for multiplication in the vector. Non-viruliferous aphids, or aphids that had acquired CRLV by feeding, did not transmit CMotV when they were injected with haemolymph from aphids that had fed on a source of CMotV alone, confirming that they can only transmit CMotV when they acquire it from a mixedly infected plant. When extracts from donor aphids were treated with ether before injection, recipient aphids transmitted both CRLV and CMotV, although the infectivity of CMotV grown in Nicotiana clevelandii in the absence of CRLV is destroyed by ether treatment. CMotV particles acquired by aphids from mixedly infected plants therefore differed in some way from those in singly infected plants. A plausible explanation of these results, and of the dependence of CMotV on CRLV for aphid transmission, is that doubly infected plants contain some particles that consist of CMotV nucleic acid coated with CRLV protein.     

Studies on the transmission of groundnut rosette virus by Aphis craccivora Koch

Four strains of groundnut rosette virus were transmitted by a race of Aphis craccivora (Koch) from groundnut in Nigeria. Two of these strains, both from East Africa, were transmitted only by A. craccivora from Kenya. A fifth isolate, from Nigeria, was not transmissible by either race. The two races of aphids have been shown elsewhere to be distinct biotypes. Most A. craccivora needed longer than 24 h feeding on infected groundnuts to acquire virus, and many needed 2–3 days of feeding on healthy plants to cause infection, even after several days on infected plants. The delays partly reflect the slow uptake of virus and possibly a period needed for virus multiplication in aphid tissue but some is lost through resistance of the test plants to infection. In consecutive feeding experiments Natal Common variety could be infected soon after aphids had left the source of virus, but a more resistant Nigerian variety sometimes needed several more days. The frequency of inoculation by aphids, or the concentration of virus in the inocula or both, increased with time, but the times at which aphids were able to infect plants was also dependent on variety.