首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
In ewes during the breeding season, estradiol (E) and progesterone (P) synergistically regulate pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion. E primarily inhibits LH pulse amplitude and P inhibits LH pulse frequency. To determine if endogenous opioid peptides (EOP) mediate these negative feedback effects, we administered the long-acting opioid antagonist WIN 44,441-3 (WIN) to intact ewes during the luteal and follicular phases of the estrous cycle and to ovariectomized ewes treated with no steroids, E, P, or E plus P. Steroid levels were maintained at levels seen during the estrous cycle by Silastic implants placed shortly after surgery. WIN increased LH pulse frequency, but not amplitude, in luteal phase ewes. In contrast, during the follicular phase, LH pulse amplitude was increased by WIN and pulse frequency was unchanged. Neither LH pulse frequency nor pulse amplitude was affected by WIN in long-term ovariectomized ewes untreated with steroids. In contrast, WIN slightly increased LH pulse frequency in short-term ovariectomized ewes. WIN also increased LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes treated with P or E plus P. WIN did not affect pulse frequency but did increase LH pulse amplitude in E-treated ewes. These results support the hypothesis that EOP participate in the negative feedback effects of E and P on pulsatile LH secretion during the breeding season and that the inhibitory effects of EOP may persist for some time after ovariectomy.  相似文献   

2.
Fifteen ovariectomized ewes were treated with implants (s.c.) creating circulating luteal progesterone concentrations of 1.6 +/- 0.1 ng ml-1 serum. Ten days later, progesterone implants were removed from five ewes which were then infused with saline for 64 h (0.154 mol NaCl l-1, 20 ml h-1, i.v.). Ewes with progesterone implants remaining were infused with saline (n = 5) or naloxone (0.5 mg kg-1 h-1, n = 5) in saline for 64 h. At 36 h of infusion, all ewes were injected with oestradiol (20 micrograms in 1 ml groundnut oil, i.m.). During the first 36 h of infusion, serum luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations were similar in ewes infused with saline after progesterone withdrawal and ewes infused with naloxone, but with progesterone implants remaining (1.23 +/- 0.11 and 1.28 +/- 0.23 ng ml-1 serum, respectively, mean +/- SEM, P greater than 0.05). These values exceeded circulating LH concentrations during the first 36 h of saline infusion of ewes with progesterone implants remaining (0.59 +/- 0.09 ng ml-1 serum, P less than 0.05). The data suggested that progesterone suppression of tonic LH secretion, before oestradiol injection, was completely antagonized by naloxone. After oestradiol injection, circulating LH concentrations decreased for about 10 h in ewes of all groups. A surge in circulating LH concentrations peaked 24 h after oestradiol injection in ewes infused with saline after progesterone withdrawal (8.16 +/- 3.18 ng LH ml-1 serum).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)  相似文献   

3.
Opioid modulation of LH secretion in the ewe   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
Administration of opioid agonists and antagonists and measurement of resulting hormone changes were used to study the possible effects of opioids on reproductive function in the ewe. Intravenous administration of the long-acting methionine-enkephalin analogue FK33-824 (250 micrograms/h for 12 h) to 3 ewes during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle depressed episodic LH secretion. This effect was reversed by administration of the opiate antagonist naloxone (25 mg/h) in combination with the FK33-824 treatment; in fact LH secretion was enhanced by the combined regimen. Naloxone (25 mg/h for 12 h) administered alone to 3 ewes in the follicular phase also enhanced LH secretion. In 3 animals treated with FK33-824 during the follicular phase, progesterone remained basal for 14 days after treatment, suggesting that ovulation was blocked. Jugular venous infusion of naloxone (25, 50 or 100 mg/h for 8h) into 5 ewes during the early and mid-luteal phase of the cycle resulted overall in a significant increase in mean plasma LH concentrations and LH episode frequency. To investigate whether endogenous opioids suppress LH release in seasonally anoestrous sheep, naloxone was infused intravenously into mature (25, 50 or 100 mg/h for 8 h) and yearling ewes (12 . 5, 25 or 50 mg/h for 8 h) during early, mid- and late anoestrus and plasma LH concentrations were measured. In the mature ewes, there was a trend for naloxone to increase LH values during the early anoestrous period but naloxone was without effect during mid- and late anoestrus. In the yearlings, naloxone infusion consistently increased plasma LH concentrations as a result of a significant increase in LH episode frequency. These experiments indicate that endogenous opioid peptides probably modulate gonadotrophin secretion during both the follicular and luteal phases of the oestrous cycle. However, the follicular phase of the sheep cycle is of short duration, and there may be residual effects of luteal-phase progesterone during this period. Secondly, there may be an age-dependent effect of naloxone on LH secretion during seasonal anoestrus in the ewe, with opioids playing a part in the suppression of LH in young but not in mature animals.  相似文献   

4.
The opioid antagonist WIN-44441-3 (WIN-3, Sterling-Winthrop) caused significant increases in LH secretion in ovariectomized ewes treated with progesterone but not in ovariectomized animals treated with oestradiol-17 beta. In the non-breeding season, plasma LH concentrations in ovariectomized ewes without steroid therapy, given oestradiol-17 beta or oestradiol-17 beta and progesterone together were not affected by treatment with WIN-3 on Day 6 after ovariectomy (there was a significant increase in LH as a result of WIN-3 treatment 13 days after ovariectomy in sheep given no steroid therapy). However, WIN-3 treatment of ovariectomized sheep given progesterone resulted in a significant increase in plasma LH. WIN-3 was ineffective when given to intact ewes treated with progesterone during the non-breeding season. With ovariectomized sheep during the breeding season there was again no response to WIN-3 at 6 days after ovariectomy in sheep given oestradiol-17 beta, but significant LH elevations in animals given no steroid, those given progesterone and those given progesterone + oestradiol-17 beta. The lack of an LH response to WIN-3 in ovariectomized sheep treated with oestradiol-17 beta did not result from a reduced pituitary response to GnRH since such animals responded normally to exogenous GnRH treatment. Overall, these results are consistent with the idea that, irrespective of the time of year, progesterone exerts negative feedback upon LH release at least in part through an opioidergic mechanism, whereas oestradiol-17 beta exerts negative feedback through steps unlikely to involve opioids. Progesterone can override the effect of oestradiol-17 beta during the breeding season only. Further, there appears to be a steroid-independent opioid involvement in LH suppression, operating at both times of year.  相似文献   

5.
Three experiments were done to determine if endogenous opioid peptides (EOPs) mediate the effects of photoperiod on release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and prolactin (Prl) in ovariectomized (OVX) ewes. Intravenous infusions of 0.5 naloxone X h-1 X kg body weight-1 for 3.5 h increased (P less than 0.01) mean plasma concentrations of LH and decreased (P less than 0.025) mean interpulse interval (period) of LH pulses in OVX ewes exposed to long day lengths (16L:8D). Infusions of either 1.0 or 2.5 mg morphine-SO4 X h-1 X kg-1 for 3 h increased (P less than 0.005) the period of LH pulses and increased (P less than 0.005) concentrations of Prl in OVX ewes during the breeding season. In OVX ewes exposed to long (16L:8D) or short (8L:16D) day lengths infusions of naloxone increased (P less than 0.05) mean concentrations of LH, whereas morphine decreased (P less than 0.01) mean concentrations of LH. These effects were attributed to changes in period of LH pulses (P less than 0.001). The drug X photoperiod interactions were not significant for LH parameters. Naloxone did not affect Prl release in either long- or short-day groups, but morphine increased (P less than 0.001) Prl release during long and short day lengths. The effect of morphine on Prl release was more pronounced in ewes exposed to long day lengths than in those exposed to short day lengths. In conclusion, EOPs inhibit the LH pulse generator in OVX ewes. However, it is doubtful that the EOPs mediate the steroid-independent effects of photoperiod on LH release. The results also suggest that photoperiod may influence Prl release via opiate neurons.  相似文献   

6.
The patterns of LH and FSH secretion were measured in 4 experimental groups of Finnish Landrace and Scottish Blackface ewes: long-term (18 months) ovariectomized ewes (Group 1), long-term ovariectomized ewes with an oestradiol implant, which has been shown to produce peripheral levels of approximately 5 pg/ml (Group 2), long-term ovariectomized ewes with an oestradiol implant for 18 months which was subsequently removed (surgery on Day 0) (Group 3) and short-term ovariectomized ewes (surgery on Day 0) (Group 4). LH and FSH concentrations were monitored in all groups at approximately weekly intervals, before and after Day 0. Finnish Landrace ewes in Groups 1, 2 and 3 had significantly higher mean FSH concentrations than did Scottish Blackface ewes (P less than 0.01). FSH and LH concentrations increased significantly in Groups 3 and 4, but values in Group 4 were significantly lower (P less than 0.01) than those in Group 1 ewes even up to 30 days after ovariectomy. In Group 3, LH concentrations increased to levels similar to those in Group 1. The pattern of LH release was, however, significantly different, with a lower LH pulse frequency (P less than 0.05), but higher pulse amplitude (P less than 0.05). This difference was maintained at least until 28 days after implant removal. We suggest that removal of negative feedback by ovariectomy demonstrates an underlying breed difference in the pattern of FSH secretion and that ovarian factors other than oestradiol are also involved in the negative-feedback control of hypothalamic/pituitary gland function. Furthermore, negative-feedback effects can be maintained for long periods, at least 28 days, after ovariectomy or oestradiol implant removal.  相似文献   

7.
Ewes were sampled during the mid-late luteal phase of the oestrous cycle. Hypophysial portal and jugular venous blood samples were collected at 5-10 min intervals for a minimum of 3 h, before i.v. infusions of saline (12 ml/h; N = 6) or naloxone (40 mg/h; N = 6) for 2 h. During the 2-h saline infusion 2/6 sheep exhibited a GnRH/LH pulse; 3/6 saline infused ewes did not show a pulse during the 6-8-h portal blood sampling period. In contrast, large amplitude GnRH/LH pulses were observed during naloxone treatment in 5/6 ewes. The mean (+/- s.e.m.) amplitude of the LH secretory episodes during the naloxone infusion (1.07 +/- 0.11 ng/ml) was significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than that before the infusion in the same sheep (0.54 +/- 0.15 ng/ml). Naloxone significantly (P less than 0.005) increased the mean GnRH pulse amplitude in the 5/6 responding ewes from a pre-infusion value of 0.99 +/- 0.22 pg/min to 4.39 +/- 1.10 pg/min during infusion. This episodic GnRH secretory rate during naloxone treatment was also significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than in the saline-infused sheep (1.53 +/- 0.28 pg/min). Plasma FSH and prolactin concentrations did not change in response to the opiate antagonist. Perturbation of the endogenous opioid peptide system in the ewe by naloxone therefore increases the secretion of hypothalamic GnRH into the hypophysial portal vasculature. The response is characterized by a large-amplitude GnRH pulse which, in turn, causes a large-amplitude pulse of LH to be released by the pituitary gland.  相似文献   

8.
During 12 sampling days before ovariectomy the mean plasma FSH but not LH concentrations in FF ewes were higher (P less than 0.01) than those in ++ ewes (16 ewes/genotype). After ovariectomy increases in the concentrations of FSH and LH were noted for ewes of both genotypes within 3-4 h and the rates of increase of FSH and LH were 0.18 ng ml-1 h-1 and 0.09 ng ml-1 h-1 respectively for the first 15 h. From Days 1 to 12 after ovariectomy, the overall mean +/- s.e.m. concentrations for FSH in the FF and ++ ewes were 8.1 +/- 0.6 and 7.1 +/- 0.4 ng/ml respectively and for LH they were 2.7 +/- 0.3 and 2.1 +/- 0.2 ng/ml: these differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.09 for both FSH and LH; Student's t test). However, when the frequencies of high FSH or LH values after ovariectomy were compared with respect to genotype over time, significant F gene-specific differences were noted (P less than 0.01 for both FSH and LH; median test). In Exp. 2 another 21 ewes/genotype were blood sampled every 2nd day from Days 2 to 60 after ovariectomy and the plasma concentrations of FSH and LH were more frequently higher in FF than in ++ ewes (P less than 0.01 for FSH and LH). The F gene-specific differences in LH concentration, observed at 21-36 days after ovariectomy were due to higher mean LH amplitudes (P less than 0.025) but not LH peak frequency in FF than in ++ ewes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)  相似文献   

9.
The long-term negative feedback effects of sustained elevations in circulating estradiol and progesterone on the pulsatile secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) were evaluated in the ewe following ovariectomy during the mid-late anestrous and early breeding seasons. GnRH secretion was monitored in serial samples of hypophyseal portal blood. Steroids were administered from the time of ovariectomy by s.c. Silastic implants, which maintained plasma concentrations of estradiol and progesterone at levels resembling those that circulate during the mid-luteal phase of the estrous cycle; control ewes did not receive steroidal replacement. Analysis of hormonal pulse patterns in serial samples during 6-h periods on Days 8-10 after ovariectomy disclosed discrete, concurrent pulses of GnRH in hypothalamo-hypophyseal portal blood and LH in peripheral blood of untreated ovariectomized ewes. These pulses occurred every 97 min on the average. Treatment with either estradiol or progesterone greatly diminished or abolished detectable pulsatile secretion of GnRH and LH, infrequent pulses being evident in only 3 of 19 steroid-treated ewes. No major seasonal difference was observed in GnRH or LH pulse patterns in any group of ewes. Our findings in the ovariectomized ewe provide direct support for the conclusion that the negative-feedback effects of estradiol and progesterone on gonadotropin secretion in the ewe include an action on the brain and a consequent inhibition of pulsatile GnRH secretion.  相似文献   

10.
We recently demonstrated that progesterone and estradiol inhibit pituitary LH secretion in a synergistic fashion. This study examines the direct feedback of progesterone on the estradiol-primed pituitary. Nine ovariectomized (OVX) ewes underwent hypothalamic-pituitary disconnection (HPD) and were infused with 400 ng GnRH every 2 h throughout the experiment. After 7 days of infusion, estradiol was implanted s.c. Four days later, estradiol implants were exchanged for blank implants in 4 ewes and for progesterone implants in 5 ewes. These implants remained in place for another 4 days. Blood samples were collected around exogenous GnRH pulses before and 0.5 to 96 h after implant insertion and exchange. Serum LH and progesterone concentrations were determined through RIA. One month later, 4 of the HPD-OVX ewes previously implanted with steroids were reinfused with GnRH and the implantation protocol was repeated using blank implants only. In estradiol-primed ewes, progesterone significantly lowered LH secretion after 12 h of implantation and LH secretion remained inhibited while progesterone implants were in place (p less than 0.05). Removing estradiol transiently lowered LH secretion, and this effect was significant only 24 h after estradiol withdrawal (p less than 0.05). These data suggest that progesterone has a direct, estradiol-dependent inhibitory effect on pituitary LH release and that estradiol may sustain pituitary gonadotrope response to GnRH.  相似文献   

11.
Prepubertal ewe lambs were treated with FSH after progesterone priming for 12 days (Group P), monensin supplementation for 14 days (Group M) or a standard diet (Group C). Serial blood samples were taken for LH and progesterone assay, and ovariectomy was performed on half of each group 38-52 h after start of treatment to assess ovarian function, follicular steroid production in vitro and the concentration of gonadotrophin binding sites in follicles. The remaining ewe lambs were ovariectomized 8 days after FSH treatment to determine whether functional corpora lutea were present. FSH treatment was followed by a preovulatory LH surge which occurred significantly later (P less than 0.05) and was better synchronized in ewes in Groups P and M than in those in Group C. At 13-15 h after the LH surge significantly more large follicles were present on ovaries from Group P and M ewes than in Group C. Follicles greater than 5 mm diameter from ewes in Groups P and M produced significantly less oestrogen and testosterone and more dihydrotestosterone, and had significantly more hCG binding sites, than did similar-sized follicles from Group C animals. Ovariectomy on Day 8 after the completion of FSH treatment showed that ewes in Groups P and M had significantly greater numbers of functional corpora lutea. These results indicate that, in prepubertal ewes, progesterone priming and monensin supplementation may delay the preovulatory LH surge, allowing follicles developing after FSH treatment more time to mature before ovulation. This may result in better luteinization of ruptured follicles in these ewes, with the formation of functional corpora lutea.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)  相似文献   

12.
Heifers between Days 6 and 10 of the cycle were allocated at random to groups of 8 and treated with (i) a 4% progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID) + oestrogen capsule for 12 days; (ii) 4% PRID for 12 days; (iii) 20% PRID for 12 days; (iv) 4% for 14 days; or (v) 20% PRID for 14 days. Blood was obtained daily during treatment and at 2- or 4-h intervals for 72 h after removal of PRIDs. Some animals were sampled every 20 min for 4.676 h on the 3rd day after PRID insertion, and 1 day before and 36 h after removal of the PRID insertion, and 1 day before and 36 h after removal of the PRID. During progesterone treatment there was: (i) no correlation between concentrations of progesterone and LH within days; (ii) a significant negative correlation between progesterone and days (P less than 0.01) and also between progesterone and LH over days (P less than 0.01); (iii) the overall correlation co-efficient between LH and days was positive (P less than 0.05). The amplitude of LH or FSH episodes was not affected as progesterone concentrations declined during PRID treatment, but the number of LH (but not FSH) episodes was increased (p less than 0.01). After PRID removal, the amplitude of both LH and FSH episodes increased (P less than 0.01). We suggest that progesterone is part of a negative feedback complex on LH secretion in cattle and that this effect is apparently mediated through frequency of episodic LH release.  相似文献   

13.
To characterize the changes in LH pulse frequency during the transition to breeding season. LH pulse patterns and serum progesterone profiles were determined in 8 intact ewes from mid-anoestrus to the early breeding season. Overall, 8 increases in LH pulse frequency were observed and these were restricted to 5 ewes. Of the 8 increases, 7 occurred during the 4 weeks before the first cycle, 5 of them within 1 week after a pulse frequency typical of anoestrus (0-2 per 8 h). Six of them occurred less than 1 week before either a full-length luteal phase (n = 2) or a 1-3-day increment in progesterone (n = 4). Seven of these brief progesterone increases were observed in 6 ewes, 5 of them immediately preceding the first full-length luteal phase. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the seasonal decrease in response to oestradiol negative feedback at the beginning of the breeding season causes an increase in GnRH, and thereby LH pulse frequency. In addition, they demonstrate that the first increase in tonic LH secretion occurs in less than 1 week and, in most ewes, initiates either the first full-length cycle or a transient increase in progesterone, the latter occurring more often.  相似文献   

14.
Two experiments were conducted in Ile-de-France ewes to study changes in pulsatile LH secretion in ewes ovariectomized during anoestrus or during the midluteal phase of the oestrous cycle. In Exp. 1, blood samples were taken every 20 min for 12 h the day before ovariectomy (Day 0). After ovariectomy, samples were taken every 10 min for 6 h (10 ewes per group), on Days 1, 3, 7 and 15. In Exp. 2 samples were taken every 10 min for 6 h (10 ewes per group) on Days 7, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 after ovariectomy. Further samples were taken (5 ewes per group) at 9 and 12 months after ovariectomy. There were significant interactions between season and day of sampling for the interval between LH pulses in both experiments. LH pulse frequency increased within 1 day of ovariectomy and the increase was more rapid during the breeding season. There were clear seasonal differences in pulse frequency in Exp. 2. Compared with ewes ovariectomized in anoestrus, pulse frequency was significantly higher for ewes ovariectomized in the breeding season, from Day 7 until Day 120. Once pulse frequency had increased in ewes about the time of the normal breeding season, pulse frequency remained high and subsequent seasonal changes were greatly reduced. Pulse amplitude increased immediately after ovariectomy to reach a maximum on Day 7 and there were no differences between season of ovariectomy in the initial changes in amplitude. In Exp. 2, changes in amplitude followed changes in pulse interval and there was a significant interaction between season and day of sampling. There were no significant effects of season on nadir LH concentrations which increased throughout the duration of the experiments. These results show that, in ovariectomized ewes, LH pulse frequency observed on a given day depends on time after ovariectomy, season at the time of sampling and on previous exposure of ewes to stimulatory effects of season. The direct effects of season on LH pulse frequency and seasonal changes in sensitivity to steroid feedback may contribute to control of the breeding season and their relative contributions to the beginning and end of the breeding season may differ.  相似文献   

15.
Pituitary and ovarian responses to subcutaneous infusion of GnRH were investigated in acyclic, lactating Mule ewes during the breeding season. Thirty postpartum ewes were split into 3 equal groups; Group G received GnRH (250 ng/h) for 96 h; Group P + G was primed with progestagen for 10 d then received GnRH (250 ng/h) for 96 h; and Group P received progestagen priming and saline vehicle only. The infusions were delivered via osmotic minipumps inserted 26.6 +/- 0.45 d post partum (Day 0 of the study). Blood samples were collected for LH analysis every 15 min from 12 h before until 8 h after minipump insertion, then every 2 h for a further 112 h. Daily blood samples were collected for progesterone analysis on Days 1 to 10 following minipump insertion, then every third day for a further 25 d. In addition, the reproductive tract was examined by laparoscopy on Day -5 and Day +7 and estrous behavior was monitored between Day -4 and Day +7. Progestagen priming suppressed (P < 0.05) plasma LH levels (0.27 +/- 0.03 vs 0.46 +/- 0.06 ng/ml) during the preinfusion period, but the GnRH-induced LH release was similar for Group G and Group P + G. The LH surge began significantly (P < 0.05) earlier (32.0 +/- 3.0 vs 56.3 +/- 4.1 h) and was of greater magnitude (32.15 +/- 3.56 vs 18.84 +/- 4.13 ng/ml) in the unprimed than the primed ewes. None of the ewes infused with saline produced a preovulatory LH surge. The GnRH infusion induced ovulation in 10/10 unprimed and 7/9 progestagen-primed ewes, with no significant difference in ovulation rate (1.78 +/- 0.15 and 1.33 +/- 0.21, respectively). Ovulation was followed by normal luteal function in 4/10 Group-G ewes, while the remaining 6 ewes had short luteal phases. In contrast, each of the 7 Group-P + G ewes that ovulated secreted progesterone for at least 10 d, although elevated plasma progesterone levels were maintained in 3/7 unmated ewes for >35 d. Throughout the study only 2 ewes (both from Group P + G) displayed estrus. These data demonstrate that although a low dose, continuous infusion of GnRH can increase tonic LH concentrations sufficient to promote a preovulatory LH surge and induce ovulation, behavioral estrus and normal luteal function do not consistently follow ovulation in the progestagen-primed, postpartum ewe.  相似文献   

16.
The role of endogenous opioids and nutrition on the inhibition of luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion during the postpartum period was investigated in a Spanish breed of sheep lambing in the mid-late breeding season. Two groups of adult Rasa Aragonesa ewes housed in individual pens and lambing on 30 December were fed during the suckling period to provide maintenance requirements and the production of 1.1 (M; n=8) or 0.55 (L; n=8) kg of milk per day. On days 10, 20 and 30 after lambing, the effect of a treatment with the opiate receptor antagonist naloxone (1 mg/kg at four hourly intervals) on LH secretion was assessed in half of the ewes of each group, the remaining females receiving four saline injections. After weaning, animals were fed to provide requirements for maintenance of liveweight. Blood samples were collected twice a week from day 20 postpartum until the end of March, and assayed for progesterone and prolactin. Although underfed ewes showed significantly lower mean plasma concentrations during the control period on day 20 postpartum, nutrition did not seem to modify LH secretion before naloxone or saline injections. Moreover, no differences between nutritional groups in the response to naloxone injections on pattern of LH secretion were found. In fact, naloxone treatment induced an increase of mean LH concentrations on days 10, 20 and 30 postpartum (at least, P<0.05), of LH pulse frequency on days 20 and 30 (P<0.05), and of LH pulse amplitude on days 10 and 20 (P<0.05). Underfed ewes during the postpartum period showed a slower decline in plasma prolactin levels, with significant differences on days 29, 36 and 39 after lambing (P<0.05). Only 3 M ewes ovulated before the onset of the seasonal anoestrus period. It is concluded that endogenous opioids are involved in the inhibition of LH secretion during the early suckling period of a reduced seasonality breed of sheep without any influence of nutrition on the response to naloxone treatment; however, ewes underfed before weaning failed to reactivate their cyclicity prior to the onset of the seasonal anoestrus.  相似文献   

17.
The aim of this study was to determine whether the decline in oestradiol inhibition of circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during the peripubertal period of heifers is associated with a change in opioid modulation of LH and FSH secretion. Opioid inhibition of LH secretion was determined by response to administration of the opioid antagonist naloxone. Prepubertal heifers (403 days old) were left as intact controls, ovariectomized or ovariectomized and chronically administered oestradiol. Control heifers were used to determine time of puberty. Three weeks after ovariectomy, four doses of naloxone (0.13-0.75 mg kg-1 body weight) or saline were administered to heifers in the treatment groups in a latin square design (one dose per day). Blood samples were collected at intervals of 10 min for 2 h before and 2 h after administration of naloxone. This procedure was repeated four times at intervals of 3 weeks during the time intact control heifers were attaining puberty. All doses of naloxone induced a similar increase in concentration of serum LH within a bleeding period. During the initial bleeding period (before puberty in control heifers), administration of naloxone induced an increase in LH concentration, but the response was greater for heifers in the ovariectomized and oestradiol treated than in the ovariectomized group. At the end of the study when control heifers had attained puberty (high concentrations of progesterone indicated corpus luteum function), only heifers in the ovariectomized and oestradiol treated group responded to naloxone. Opioid inhibition of LH appeared to decline in heifers during the time control heifers were attaining puberty. Heifers in the ovariectomized group responded to naloxone at the time of administration with an increase in FSH, but FSH did not respond to naloxone at any other time. Administration of naloxone did not alter secretion of FSH in ovariectomized heifers. These results suggest that opioid neuropeptides and oestradiol are involved in regulating circulating concentrations of LH and possibly FSH during the peripubertal period. Opioid inhibition of gonadotrophin secretion appeared to decline during the peripubertal period but was still present in ovariectomized heifers treated with oestradiol after the time when age-matched control heifers had attained puberty. We conclude that opioid inhibition is important in regulating LH and FSH in circulation in heifers during the peripubertal period. However, opioids continue to be involved in regulation of circulating concentrations of LH after puberty.  相似文献   

18.
Progesterone secretion has been observed to be episodic in the late luteal phase of the oestrous cycle of ewes and is apparently independent of luteinizing hormone (LH). This study investigated the effects of suppressing the pulsatile release of LH in the early or late luteal phase on the episodic secretion of progesterone. Six Scottish Blackface ewes were treated i.m. with 1 mg kg-1 body weight of a potent gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist on either day 4 or day 11 of the luteal phase. Six ewes received saline at each time and acted as controls. Serial blood samples were collected at 10 or 15 min intervals between 0 and 8 h, 24 and 32 h, and 48 and 56 h after GnRH antagonist treatment and daily from oestrus (day 0) of the treatment cycle for 22 days. Oestrous behaviour was determined using a vasectomized ram present throughout the experiment. Progesterone secretion was episodic in both the early and late luteal phase with a frequency of between 1.6 and 3.2 pulses in 8 h. The GnRH antagonist abolished the pulsatile secretion and suppressed the basal concentrations of LH for at least 3 days after treatment. This suppression of LH, in either the early or late luteal phase, did not affect the episodic release of progesterone. Daily concentrations of progesterone in plasma showed a minimal reduction on days 11 to 14 after GnRH antagonist treatment on day 4, although this was significant (P < 0.05) only on days 11 and 13. There was no effect of treatment on day 11 on daily progesterone concentration, and the timing of luteolysis and the duration of corpus luteum function was unaffected by GnRH antagonist treatment on either day 4 or day 11. These results indicate that the episodic secretion of progesterone during the luteal phase of the oestrous cycle in ewes is independent of LH pulses and normal progesterone secretion by the corpus luteum can be maintained with minimal basal concentrations of LH.  相似文献   

19.
Experiments were conducted with ewes to investigate the effects of an enriched bovine follicular fluid inhibin preparation (INH) on gonadotrophin secretion after the onset of oestrus. Administration of INH (10 mg) 1 h after the onset of oestrus did not significantly alter the preovulatory FSH and LH surges or the second FSH peak. To determine the effects of INH on the second FSH surge, ewes were treated with saline (N = 7) or INH (N = 10) at 4 h (10 mg) and 24 h (5 mg) after the peak of the preovulatory LH surge. The second FSH surge was delayed about 24 h (P less than 0.05) in ewes treated with INH; however, the delay did not alter the interval to the next oestrus. In a third experiment, 16 ewes were assigned to 4 groups in a 2 x 2 factorial with the main effects being ovariectomy at 4 h and INH treatment (10 mg) at 4, 20 and 36 h after the peak of the LH surge. Controls received sham ovariectomy and saline injection as appropriate. Ovariectomy resulted in a rapid increase in serum FSH but not LH and this was delayed (P less than 0.05) by INH treatment. These results indicate that inhibin has a selective inhibitory action on FSH secretion in ewes and suggests that the second FSH surge results from increased basal FSH secretion due to decreased endogenous inhibin levels.  相似文献   

20.
In ewes in the mid-luteal phase, LH pulse frequency (P less than 0.01) and amplitude (P less than 0.05) increased during a 24 h infusion of naloxone (0.5 mg/kg/h) compared to a 24 h infusion of vehicle (mean +/- s.e.m.; 0.25 +/- 0.03 vs 0.14 +/- 0.01 pulses/h and 0.84 +/- 0.08 vs 0.55 +/- 0.08 ng/ml serum, respectively). The increase in pulse amplitude was immediate, but was less (P less than 0.05) during the second 12 h, compared to the first 12 h, of naloxone infusion (0.52 +/- 0.14 vs 0.98 +/- 0.08 ng/ml serum). Oestradiol concentrations were higher (P less than 0.01) during naloxone than during control infusion (5.63 +/- 0.26 vs 4.13 +/- 0.15 pg/ml serum). In ovariectomized ewes in the breeding season, LH pulse frequency was lower (P less than 0.01) during a 24 h infusion of morphine (0.5 mg/kg/h) than during a 24 h infusion of vehicle (mean +/- s.e.m.; 1.17 +/- 0.08 vs 1.71 +/- 0.06 pulses/h). We conclude that long-term infusion of naloxone results in a sustained increase in LH pulse frequency but only a transient elevation in pulse amplitude. No effects on FSH secretion were noted. LH secretion was sensitive to morphine in the absence of ovarian steroids, suggesting that ovarian steroids are not required for the presence of functional opioid receptors capable of modulating LH release.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号