Regulatory circuits of the AAA+ disaggregase Hsp104

Yeast Hsp104 is an AAA+ chaperone that rescues proteins from the aggregated state. Six protomers associate to form the functional hexamer. Each protomer contains two AAA+ modules, NBD1 and NBD2. Hsp104 converts energy provided by ATP into mechanical force used to thread polypeptides through its axial channel, thereby disrupting protein aggregates. But how the action of its 12 AAA+ domains is co-ordinated to catalyze disaggregation remained unexplained. Here, we identify a sophisticated allosteric network consisting of three distinct pathways that senses the nucleotide state of AAA+ modules and transmits this information across the Hsp104 hexamer. As a result of this communication, NBD1 and NBD2 each adopt two distinct conformations (relaxed and tense) that are reciprocally regulated. The key element in the network is the NBD1-ATP state that enables Hsp104 to switch from a barely active [(T)(R)] state to a highly active [(R)(T)] state. This concerted switch involves both cis and trans protomer interactions and provides Hsp104 with the mechanistic scaffold to catalyze disaggregation. It prepares the chaperone for polypeptide binding and activates NBD2 to generate the power strokes required to resolve protein aggregates. ATP hydrolysis in NBD1 resolves the high affinity [(R)(T)] state and switches the chaperone back into the low affinity [(T)(R)] state. Our model integrates previously unexplained observations and provides the first comprehensive map of nucleotide-related allosteric signals in a class-1 AAA+ protein.     

Nucleotide-dependent substrate recognition by the AAA+ HslUV protease

ATP-dependent protein degradation is controlled principally by substrate recognition. The AAA+ HslU ATPase is thought to bind protein substrates, denature them, and translocate the unfolded polypeptide into the HslV peptidase. The lack of well-behaved high-affinity substrates for HslUV (ClpYQ) has hampered understanding of the rules and mechanism of substrate engagement. We show that HslUV efficiently degrades Arc repressor, especially at heat-shock temperatures. Degradation depends on sequences near the N terminus of Arc. Fusion protein and peptide-binding experiments demonstrate that this sequence is a degradation tag that binds directly to HslU. Strong binding of this tag to the enzyme requires ATP and Mg(2+). Furthermore, fusion of this sequence to a protein with marked mechanical stability leads to complete degradation. Thus, these experiments demonstrate that HslUV is a powerful protein unfoldase and that initial substrate engagement by the HslU ATPase must occur after ATP binding.     

Atypical AAA+ subunit packing creates an expanded cavity for disaggregation by the protein-remodeling factor Hsp104

Hsp104, a yeast protein-remodeling factor of the AAA+ (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) superfamily, and its homologs in bacteria and plants mediate cell recovery after severe stress by disaggregating denatured proteins through a poorly understood mechanism. Here, we present cryo-electron microscopy maps and domain fitting of Hsp104 hexamers, revealing an unusual arrangement of AAA+ modules with the prominent coiled-coil domain intercalated between the AAA+ domains. This packing results in a greatly expanded cavity, which is capped at either end by N- and C-terminal domains. The fitted structures as well as mutation of conserved coiled-coil arginines suggest that the coiled-coil domain plays a major role in the extraction of proteins from aggregates, providing conserved residues for key functions in ATP hydrolysis and potentially for substrate interaction. The large cavity could enable the uptake of polypeptide loops without a requirement for exposed N or C termini.     

Nucleotide-induced switch in oligomerization of the AAA+ ATPase ClpB

ClpB is a member of the bacterial protein-disaggregating chaperone machinery and belongs to the AAA(+) superfamily of ATPases associated with various cellular activities. The mechanism of ClpB-assisted reactivation of strongly aggregated proteins is unknown and the oligomeric state of ClpB has been under discussion. Sedimentation equilibrium and sedimentation velocity show that, under physiological ionic strength in the absence of nucleotides, ClpB from Escherichia coli undergoes reversible self-association that involves protein concentration-dependent populations of monomers, heptamers, and intermediate-size oligomers. Under low ionic strength conditions, a heptamer becomes the predominant form of ClpB. In contrast, ATP gamma S, a nonhydrolyzable ATP analog, as well as ADP stabilize hexameric ClpB. Consistently, electron microscopy reveals that ring-type oligomers of ClpB in the absence of nucleotides are larger than those in the presence of ATP gamma S. Thus, the binding of nucleotides without hydrolysis of ATP produces a significant change in the self-association equilibria of ClpB: from reactions supporting formation of a heptamer to those supporting a hexamer. Our results show how ClpB and possibly other related AAA(+) proteins can translate nucleotide binding into a major structural transformation and help explain why previously published electron micrographs of some AAA(+) ATPases detected both six- and sevenfold particle symmetry.     

A conserved strategy for structure change and energy transduction in Hsp104 and other AAA+ protein motors

The superfamily of massively large AAA+ protein molecular machines functions to convert the chemical energy of cytosolic ATP into physicomechanical form and use it to perform an extraordinary number of physical operations on proteins, nucleic acids, and membrane systems. Cryo-EM studies now reveal some aspects of substrate handling at high resolution, but the broader interpretation of AAA+ functional properties is still opaque. This paper integrates recent hydrogen exchange results for the typical AAA+ protein Hsp104 with prior information on several near and distantly related others. The analysis points to a widely conserved functional strategy. Hsp104 cycles through a long-lived loosely-structured energy-input “open” state that releases spent ADP and rebinds cytosolic ATP. ATP-binding energy is transduced by allosteric structure change to poise the protein at a high energy level in a more tightly structured “closed” state. The briefly occupied energy-output closed state binds substrate strongly and is catalytically active. ATP hydrolysis permits energetically downhill structural relaxation, which is coupled to drive energy-requiring substrate processing. Other AAA+ proteins appear to cycle through states that are analogous functionally if not in structural detail. These results revise the current model for AAA+ function, explain the structural basis of single-molecule optical tweezer kinetic phases, identify the separate energetic roles of ATP binding and hydrolysis, and specify a sequence of structural and energetic events that carry AAA+ proteins unidirectionally around a functional cycle to propel their diverse physical tasks.     

Broad yet high substrate specificity: the challenge of AAA+ proteins

AAA+ proteins remodel target substrates in an ATP-dependent manner, an activity that is of central importance for a plethora of cellular processes. While sharing a similar hexameric structure AAA+ proteins must exhibit differences in substrate recognition to fulfil their diverse biological functions. Here we describe strategies of AAA+ proteins to ensure substrate specificity. AAA domains can directly mediate substrate recognition, however, in general extra domains, added to the core AAA domain, control substrate interaction. Such extra domains may either directly recognize substrates or serve as a platform for adaptor proteins, which transfer bound substrates to their AAA+ partner proteins. The positioning of adaptor proteins in substrate recognition can enable them to control the activity of their partner proteins by coupling AAA+ protein activation to substrate availability.     

Conserved residues in the N-domain of the AAA+ chaperone ClpA regulate substrate recognition and unfolding

Protein degradation in the cytosol of Escherichia coli is carried out by a variety of different proteolytic machines, including ClpAP. The ClpA component is a hexameric AAA+ (ATPase associated with various cellular activities) chaperone that utilizes the energy of ATP to control substrate recognition and unfolding. The precise role of the N-domains of ClpA in this process, however, remains elusive. Here, we have analysed the role of five highly conserved basic residues in the N-domain of ClpA by monitoring the binding, unfolding and degradation of several different substrates, including short unstructured peptides, tagged and untagged proteins. Interestingly, mutation of three of these basic residues within the N-domain of ClpA (H94, R86 and R100) did not alter substrate degradation. In contrast mutation of two conserved arginine residues (R90 and R131), flanking a putative peptide-binding groove within the N-domain of ClpA, specifically compromised the ability of ClpA to unfold and degrade selected substrates but did not prevent substrate recognition, ClpS-mediated substrate delivery or ClpP binding. In contrast, a highly conserved tyrosine residue lining the central pore of the ClpA hexamer was essential for the degradation of all substrate types analysed, including both folded and unstructured proteins. Taken together, these data suggest that ClpA utilizes two structural elements, one in the N-domain and the other in the pore of the hexamer, both of which are required for efficient unfolding of some protein substrates.     

Coupling of oligomerization and nucleotide binding in the AAA+ chaperone ClpB

Members of the family of ATPases associated with various cellular activities (AAA+) typically form homohexameric ring complexes and are able to remodel their substrates, such as misfolded proteins or protein-protein complexes, in an ATP-driven process. The molecular mechanism by which ATP hydrolysis is coordinated within the multimeric complex and the energy is converted into molecular motions, however, is poorly understood. This is partly due to the fact that the oligomers formed by AAA+ proteins represent a highly complex system and analysis depends on simplification and prior knowledge. Here, we present nucleotide binding and oligomer assembly kinetics of the AAA+ protein ClpB, a molecular chaperone that is able to disaggregate protein aggregates in concert with the DnaK chaperone system. ClpB bears two AAA+ domains (NBD1 and NBD2) on one subunit and forms homohexameric ring complexes. In order to dissect individual mechanistic steps, we made use of a reconstituted system based on two individual constructs bearing either the N-terminal (NBD1) or the C-terminal AAA+ domain (NBD2). In contrast to the C-terminal construct, the N-terminal construct does not bind the fluorescent nucleotide MANT-dADP in isolation. However, sequential mixing experiments suggest that NBD1 obtains nucleotide binding competence when incorporated into an oligomeric complex. These findings support a model in which nucleotide binding to NBD1 is dependent on and regulated by trans-acting elements from neighboring subunits, either by direct interaction with the nucleotide or by stabilization of a nucleotide binding-competent state. In this way, they provide a basis for intersubunit communication within the functional ClpB complex.     

Role of the C-terminal region of mouse inducible Hsp72 in the recognition of peptide substrate for chaperone activity

Here, we produced the C-terminal truncation variants of mouse inducible heat shock protein 72 (Hsp72) to elucidate the regulatory role of the C-terminal helical lid of Hsp70 for substrate recognition. All of the truncation variants containing the substrate binding domain bound a short-length peptide substrate CLLLSAPRR. When a large mass reduced carboxymethyl alpha-lactalbumin (RCMLA) as a substrate was used in gel filtration experiment, we observed the complex formation only for the truncation variants containing the long alpha-helix C in the helical lid. However, RCMLA binding occurred even for the variants lacking alpha-helix C when their C-terminal region was anchored onto a solid phase. Together with the finding that helix C is involved in the self-association of Hsp70, our present data suggest that the C-terminal region of Hsp70 modulates the substrate recognition and its kinetics may be substrate-mass dependent.     

Differences in the curing of [PSI+] prion by various methods of Hsp104 inactivation

[PSI(+)] yeast, containing the misfolded amyloid conformation of Sup35 prion, is cured by inactivation of Hsp104. There has been controversy as to whether inactivation of Hsp104 by guanidine treatment or by overexpression of the dominant negative Hsp104 mutant, Hsp104-2KT, cures [PSI(+)] by the same mechanism- inhibition of the severing of the prion seeds. Using live cell imaging of Sup35-GFP, overexpression of Hsp104-2KT caused the foci to increase in size, then decrease in number, and finally disappear when the cells were cured, similar to that observed in cells cured by depletion of Hsp104. In contrast, guanidine initially caused an increase in foci size but then the foci disappeared before the cells were cured. By starving the yeast to make the foci visible in cells grown with guanidine, the number of cells with foci was found to correlate exactly with the number of [PSI(+)] cells, regardless of the curing method. Therefore, the fluorescent foci are the prion seeds required for maintenance of [PSI(+)] and inactivation of Hsp104 cures [PSI(+)] by preventing severing of the prion seeds. During curing with guanidine, the reduction in seed size is an Hsp104-dependent effect that cannot be explained by limited severing of the seeds. Instead, in the presence of guanidine, Hsp104 retains an activity that trims or reduces the size of the prion seeds by releasing Sup35 molecules that are unable to form new prion seeds. This Hsp104 activity may also occur in propagating yeast.     

Cooperative kinetics of both Hsp104 ATPase domains and interdomain communication revealed by AAA sensor-1 mutants.

AAA proteins share a conserved active site for ATP hydrolysis and regulate many cellular processes. AAA proteins are oligomeric and often have multiple ATPase domains per monomer, which is suggestive of complex allosteric kinetics of ATP hydrolysis. Here, using wild-type Hsp104 in the hexameric state, we demonstrate that its two AAA modules (NBD1 and NBD2) have very different catalytic activities, but each displays cooperative kinetics of hydrolysis. Using mutations in the AAA sensor-1 motif of NBD1 and NBD2 that reduce the rate of ATP hydrolysis without affecting nucleotide binding, we also examine the consequences of keeping each site in the ATP-bound state. In vitro, reducing k(cat) at NBD2 significantly alters the steady-state kinetic behavior of NBD1. Thus, Hsp104 exhibits allosteric communication between the two sites in addition to homotypic cooperativity at both NBD1 and NBD2. In vivo, each sensor-1 mutation causes a loss-of-function phenotype in two assays of Hsp104 function (thermotolerance and yeast prion propagation), demonstrating the importance of ATP hydrolysis as distinct from ATP binding at each site for Hsp104 function.     

Amino acid residues involved in substrate recognition of the Escherichia coli Orf135 protein

The Escherichia coli Orf135 protein, a MutT-type enzyme, hydrolyzes mutagenic 2-hydroxy-dATP (2-OH-dATP) and 8-hydroxy-dGTP, in addition to dCTP and 5-methyl-dCTP, and its deficiency causes increases in both the spontaneous and H(2)O(2)-induced mutation frequencies. To identify the amino acid residues that interact with these nucleotides, the Glu-33, Arg-72, Arg-77, and Asp-118 residues of Orf135, which are candidates for residues interacting with the base, were substituted, and the enzymatic activities of these mutant proteins were examined. The mutant proteins with a substitution at the 33rd, 72nd, and 118th amino acid residues displayed activities affected to various degrees for each substrate, suggesting the involvement of these residues in substrate binding. On the other hand, the mutant protein with a substitution at the 77th Arg residue had activitiy similar to that of the wild-type protein, excluding the possibility that this Arg side chain is involved in base recognition. In addition, the expression of some Orf135 mutants in orf135(-) E. coli reduced the level of formation of rpoB mutants elicited by H(2)O(2). These results reveal the residues involved in the substrate binding of the E. coli Orf135 protein.     

Substrate recognition by AAA+ ATPases: distinct substrate binding modes in ATP-dependent protease Yme1 of the mitochondrial intermembrane space

The energy-dependent proteolysis of cellular proteins is mediated by conserved proteolytic AAA(+) complexes. Two such machines, the m- and i-AAA proteases, are present in the mitochondrial inner membrane. They exert chaperone-like properties and specifically degrade nonnative membrane proteins. However, molecular mechanisms of substrate engagement by AAA proteases remained elusive. Here, we define initial steps of substrate recognition and identify two distinct substrate binding sites in the i-AAA protease subunit Yme1. Misfolded polypeptides are recognized by conserved helices in proteolytic and AAA domains. Structural modeling reveals a lattice-like arrangement of these helices at the surface of hexameric AAA protease ring complexes. While helices within the AAA domain apparently play a general role for substrate binding, the requirement for binding to surface-exposed helices within the proteolytic domain is determined by the folding and membrane association of substrates. Moreover, an assembly factor of cytochrome c oxidase, Cox20, serves as a substrate-specific cofactor during proteolysis and modulates the initial interaction of nonassembled Cox2 with the protease. Our findings therefore reveal the existence of alternative substrate recognition pathways within AAA proteases and shed new light on molecular mechanisms ensuring the specificity of proteolysis by energy-dependent proteases.     

Roles of the N domain of the AAA+ Lon protease in substrate recognition,allosteric regulation and chaperone activity

Degron binding regulates the activities of the AAA+ Lon protease in addition to targeting proteins for degradation. The sul20 degron from the cell‐division inhibitor SulA is shown here to bind to the N domain of Escherichia coli Lon, and the recognition site is identified by cross‐linking and scanning for mutations that prevent sul20‐peptide binding. These N‐domain mutations limit the rates of proteolysis of model sul20‐tagged substrates and ATP hydrolysis by an allosteric mechanism. Lon inactivation of SulA in vivo requires binding to the N domain and robust ATP hydrolysis but does not require degradation or translocation into the proteolytic chamber. Lon‐mediated relief of proteotoxic stress and protein aggregation in vivo can also occur without degradation but is not dependent on robust ATP hydrolysis. In combination, these results demonstrate that Lon can function as a protease or a chaperone and reveal that some of its ATP‐dependent biological activities do not require translocation.     

Versatile modes of peptide recognition by the AAA+ adaptor protein SspB

Energy-dependent proteases often rely on adaptor proteins to modulate substrate recognition. The SspB adaptor binds peptide sequences in the stress-response regulator RseA and in ssrA-tagged proteins and delivers these molecules to the AAA+ ClpXP protease for degradation. The structure of SspB bound to an ssrA peptide is known. Here, we report the crystal structure of a complex between SspB and its recognition peptide in RseA. Notably, the RseA sequence is positioned in the peptide-binding groove of SspB in a direction opposite to the ssrA peptide, the two peptides share only one common interaction with the adaptor, and the RseA interaction site is substantially larger than the overlapping ssrA site. This marked diversity in SspB recognition of different target proteins indicates that it is capable of highly flexible and dynamic substrate delivery.     

The Yeast AAA+ Chaperone Hsp104 Is Part of a Network That Links the Actin Cytoskeleton with the Inheritance of Damaged Proteins

The yeast AAA⁺ chaperone Hsp104 is essential for the development of thermotolerance and for the inheritance of prions. Recently, Hsp104, together with the actin cytoskeleton, has been implicated in the asymmetric distribution of carbonylated proteins. Here, we investigated the interplay between Hsp104 and actin by using a dominant-negative variant of Hsp104 (HAP/ClpP) that degrades substrate proteins instead of remodeling them. Coexpression of HAP/ClpP causes defects in morphology and the actin cytoskeleton. Taking a candidate approach, we identified Spa2, a member of the polarisome complex, as an Hsp104 substrate. Furthermore, we provided genetic evidence that links Spa2 and Hsp104 to Hof1, a member of the cytokinesis machinery. Spa2 and Hof1 knockout cells are affected in the asymmetric distribution of damaged proteins, suggesting that Hsp104, Spa2, and Hof1 are members of a network controlling the inheritance of carbonylated proteins.The ensemble of molecular chaperones and proteases constitutes the cellular system that repairs and eliminates misfolded proteins. The activity of this system ensures not only the recovery of cells from protein-damaging stress conditions, but also the maintenance of protein homeostasis under normal growth conditions. The concomitant involvement of members of the Hsp70 and Hsp90 chaperone families in stress-related, regulatory, and housekeeping functions allows the integration of environmental stimuli into regulatory networks (4, 24, 39, 40). However, it has remained unclear whether other chaperones are also involved in regulatory processes.One chaperone which so far has been connected only to stress-related protein quality functions is the oligomeric AAA⁺ chaperone Hsp104 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Hsp104 is essential for the development of thermotolerance by reactivating aggregated proteins after severe stress conditions and for prion propagation by severing prion fibrils (31). Yeast cells, when grown at 30°C, harbor approximately 5,000 copies of Hsp104 hexamers per cell, a number that is minor compared to other cytosolic chaperone machineries (e.g., Hsp70 and Hsp90) that are involved in general protein-folding events (10). The known cellular functions of Hsp104, however, cannot provide a rationale for the determined Hsp104 levels, since protein aggregation is hardly detectable in yeast cells at 30°C even in mutant cells lacking Hsp104 function. Furthermore, yeast prions occur de novo at a very low rate of 10⁻⁶ per cell. In consequence, both well-characterized Hsp104 activities are barely required at 30°C, suggesting that Hsp104 has additional, so far unknown housekeeping functions. On the other hand, an S. cerevisiae hsp104 knockout exhibits no obvious phenotype at 30°C (27), giving no clues to a potential involvement of Hsp104 in other cellular processes.Recently, Hsp104 was demonstrated to influence the asymmetric distribution of oxidatively damaged (carbonylated) proteins (8). It remained unclear whether the role of Hsp104 in this process relies on its known activities in protein quality control or on an unknown involvement in other cellular processes. Here, we provide evidence that Hsp104 is part of a network that controls the inheritance of damaged proteins under physiological growth conditions.     

DNA chirality-dependent stimulation of topoisomerase IV activity by the C-terminal AAA+ domain of FtsK

We have studied the stimulation of topoisomerase IV (Topo IV) by the C-terminal AAA+ domain of FtsK. These two proteins combine to assure proper chromosome segregation in the cell. Stimulation of Topo IV activity was dependent on the chirality of the DNA substrate: FtsK stimulated decatenation of catenated DNA and relaxation of positively supercoiled [(+)ve sc] DNA, but inhibited relaxation of negatively supercoiled [(−)ve sc] DNA. The DNA translocation activity of FtsK was not required for stimulation, but was required for inhibition. DNA chirality did not affect any of the activities of FtsK, suggesting that FtsK possesses an inherent Topo IV stimulatory activity that is presumably mediated by protein–protein interactions, the stability of Topo IV on the DNA substrate dictated the effect observed. Inhibition occurs because FtsK can strip distributively acting topoisomerase off (−)ve scDNA, but not from either (+)ve scDNA or catenated DNA where the enzyme acts processively. Our analyses suggest that FtsK increases the efficiency of trapping of the transfer segment of DNA during the catalytic cycle of the topoisomerase.