Structure-based sequence alignment of elongation factors Tu and G with related GTPases involved in translation

The G domain and domain II in the crystal structure of Thermus thermophilus elongation factor G (EF-G) were compared with the homologous domains in Thermus aquaticus elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu). Sequence alignment derived from the structural superposition was used to define conserved sequence elements in domain II. These elements and previously known conserved sequence elements in the G domain were used to guide the alignment of the sequences of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius elongation factor 2, human elongation factor 2, and Escherichia coli initiation factor 2 and release factor 3 to the aligned sequences of EF-G and EF-Tu. This alignment, which deviates from previously published alignments, has evolutionary implications and leads to alternative interpretations of biochemical data concerning the interaction of elongation factors with the -sarcin/ricin region of the ribosome. A single conserved sequence motif in domain II was identified and used to further characterize the GTPase subfamily of translation factors and related proteins. It was shown that the motif is found in most if not all the members of the family. Apparently, the common characteristic of these GTPases is an extensive consensus structural unit that possibly accounts for a similar interaction with the ribosome and is composed of two domains homologous to the G domain and domain II in EF-Tu and EF-G.     

Structure and Functions of the Prokaryotic Elongation Factor G

Structural and functional data on elongation factor G (EF-G) are reviewed with regard to nucleotide exchange, GTP hydrolysis, mechanism of action of fusidic acid, and functional roles of the EF-G structural domains in translocation. Biochemical data are correlated with structural dynamics of the EF-G molecule on interaction with various ligands. Data on EF-Tu are also considered, as EF-G and EF-Tu share certain structural and functional features.     

Structure and functions of the prokaryotic elongation factor G

Structural and functional data on elongation factor G (EF-G) are reviewed with regard to nucleotide exchange, GTP hydrolysis, mechanism of action of fusidic acid, and functional roles of the EF-G structural domains in translocation. Biochemical data are correlated with structural dynamics of the EF-G molecule on interaction with various ligands. Data on EF-Tu are also considered, as EF-G and EF-Tu share certain structural and functional features.     

Possible evolution of factors involved in protein biosynthesis.

The elongation factors of protein biosynthesis are well preserved through out evolution. They catalyze the elongation phase of protein biosynthesis, where on the ribosome amino acids are added one at a time to a growing peptide according to the genetic information transcribed into mRNA. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) provides the binding of aminoacylated tRNA to the ribosome and protects the aminoester bond against hydrolysis until a correct match between the codon on mRNA and the anticodon on tRNA can be achieved. Elongation factor G (EF-G) supports the translocation of tRNAs and of mRNA on the ribosome so that a new codon can be exposed for decoding. Both these factors are GTP binding proteins, and as such exist in an active form with GTP and an inactive form with GDP bound to the nucleotide binding domain. Elongation factor Ts (EF-Ts) will catalyze the exchange of nucleotide on EF-Tu. This review describes structural work on EF-Tu performed in our laboratory over the last eight years. The structural results provide a rather complete picture of the major structural forms of EF-Tu, including the so called ternary complex of aa-tRNA:EF-Tu:GTP. The structural comparison of this ternary complex with the structure of EF-G:GDP displays an unexpected macromolecular mimicry, where three domains of EF-G mimick the shape of the tRNA in the ternary complex. This observation has initiated much speculation on the evolution of all factors involved in protein synthesis, as well as on the details of the ribosomal function in one part of elongation.     

Molecular dynamics of ribosomal elongation factors G and Tu

Translation on the ribosome is controlled by external factors. During polypeptide lengthening, elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G consecutively interact with the bacterial ribosome. EF-Tu binds and delivers an aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal A site and EF-G helps translocate the tRNAs between their binding sites after the peptide bond is formed. These processes occur at the expense of GTP. EF-Tu:tRNA and EF-G are of similar shape, share a common binding site, and undergo large conformational changes on interaction with the ribosome. To characterize the internal motion of these two elongation factors, we used 25 ns long all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. We observed enhanced mobility of EF-G domains III, IV, and V and of tRNA in the EF-Tu:tRNA complex. EF-Tu:GDP complex acquired a configuration different from that found in the crystal structure of EF-Tu with a GTP analogue, showing conformational changes in the switch I and II regions. The calculated electrostatic properties of elongation factors showed no global similarity even though matching electrostatic surface patches were found around the domain I that contacts the ribosome, and in the GDP/GTP binding region.     

Role of domains 4 and 5 in elongation factor G functions on the ribosome

Elongation factor G (EF-G) is a large, five domain GTPase that catalyses the translocation of the tRNAs on the bacterial ribosome at the expense of GTP. In the crystal structure of GDP-bound EF-G, domain 1 (G domain) makes direct contacts with domains 2 and 5, whereas domain 4 protrudes from the body of the molecule. Here, we show that the presence of both domains 4 and 5 is essential for tRNA translocation and for the turnover of the factor on the ribosome, but not for rapid single-round GTP hydrolysis by EF-G. Replacement of a highly conserved histidine residue at the tip of domain 4, His583, with lysine or arginine decreases the rate of tRNA translocation at least 100-fold, whereas the binding of the factor to the ribosome, GTP hydrolysis and P(i) release are not affected by the mutations. Various small deletions in the tip region of domain 4 decrease the translocation activity of EF-G even further, but do not block the turnover of the factor. Unlike native EF-G, the mutants of EF-G lacking domains 4/5 do not interact with the alpha-sarcin stem-loop of 23 S rRNA. These mutants are not released from the ribosome after GTP hydrolysis or translocation, indicating that the contact with, or a conformational change of, the alpha-sarcin stem-loop is required for EF-G release from the ribosome.     

Structure of a mutant EF-G reveals domain III and possibly the fusidic acid binding site

The crystal structure of Thermus thermophilus elongation factor G (EF-G) carrying the point mutation His573Ala was determined at a resolution of 2.8 A. The mutant has a more closed structure than that previously reported for wild-type EF-G. This is obtained by a 10 degrees rigid rotation of domains III, IV and V with regard to domains I and II. This rotation results in a displacement of the tip of domain IV by approximately 9 A. The structure of domain III is now fully visible and reveals the double split beta-alpha-beta motif also observed for EF-G domain V and for several ribosomal proteins. A large number of fusidic acid resistant mutations found in domain III have now been possible to locate. Possible locations for the effector loop and a possible binding site for fusidic acid are discussed in relation to some of the fusidic acid resistant mutations.     

On the Origin of Protein Synthesis Factors: A Gene Duplication/Fusion Model

Sequence similarity has given rise to the proposal that IF-2, EF-G, and EF-Tu are related through a common ancestor. We evaluate this proposition and whether the relationship can be extended to other factors of protein synthesis. Analysis of amino acid sequence similarity gives statistical support for an evolutionary affiliation among IF-1, IF-2, IF-3, EF-Tu, EF-Ts, and EF-G and suggests further that this association is a result of gene duplication/fusion events. In support of this mechanism, the three-dimensional structures of IF-3, EF-Tu, and EF-G display a predictable domain structure and overall conformational similarity. The model that we propose consists of three consecutives duplication/fusion events which would have taken place before the divergence of the three superkingdoms: eubacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes. The root of this protein superfamily tree would be an ancestor of the modern IF-1 gene sequence. The repeated fundamental motif of this protein superfamily is a small RNA binding domain composed of two α-helices packed along side of an antiparallel β-sheet. Received: 17 October 1996 / Accepted: 10 June 1997     

Alteration in location of a conserved GTPase-associated center of the ribosome induced by mutagenesis influences the structure of peptidyltransferase center and activity of elongation factor G

Translocation catalyzed by elongation factor G occurs after the peptidyltransferase reaction on the large ribosomal subunit. Deacylated tRNA in the P-site stimulates multiple turnover GTPase activity of EF-G. We suggest that the allosteric signal from the peptidyltransferase center that activates EF-G may involve the alteration in the conformation of elongation factor binding center of the ribosome. The latter consists of the moveable GTPase-associated center and the sarcin-ricin loop that keeps its position on the ribosome during translation elongation. The position of the GTPase-associated center was altered by mutagenesis. An insertion of additional base pair at positions C1030/G1124 was lethal and affected function of EF-G, but not that of EF-Tu. Structure probing revealed a putative allosteric signal pathway connecting the P-site with the binding site of the elongation factors. The results are consistent with the different structural requirements for EF-G and EF-Tu function, where the integrity of the path between the peptidyltransferase center and both GTPase-associated center and sarcin-ricin loop is important for EF-G binding.     

The uncharacterized bacterial protein YejG has the same architecture as domain III of elongation factor G

InterPro family IPR020489 comprises ~1000 uncharacterized bacterial proteins. Previously we showed that overexpressing the Escherichia coli representative of this family, EcYejG, conferred low-level resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics. In an attempt to shed light on the biochemical function of EcYejG, we have solved its structure using multinuclear solution NMR spectroscopy. The structure most closely resembles that of domain III from elongation factor G (EF-G). EF-G catalyzes ribosomal translocation and mutations in EF-G have also been associated with aminoglycoside resistance. While we were unable to demonstrate a direct interaction between EcYejG and the ribosome, the protein might play a role in translation.     

The ribosomal stalk binds to translation factors IF2, EF-Tu, EF-G and RF3 via a conserved region of the L12 C-terminal domain

Efficient protein synthesis in bacteria requires initiation factor 2 (IF2), elongation factors Tu (EF-Tu) and G (EF-G), and release factor 3 (RF3), each of which catalyzes a major step of translation in a GTP-dependent fashion. Previous reports have suggested that recruitment of factors to the ribosome and subsequent GTP hydrolysis involve the dimeric protein L12, which forms a flexible "stalk" on the ribosome. Using heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy we demonstrate that L12 binds directly to the factors IF2, EF-Tu, EF-G, and RF3 from Escherichia coli, and map the region of L12 involved in these interactions. Factor-dependent chemical shift changes show that all four factors bind to the same region of the C-terminal domain of L12. This region includes three strictly conserved residues, K70, L80, and E82, and a set of highly conserved residues, including V66, A67, V68 and G79. Upon factor binding, all NMR signals from the C-terminal domain become broadened beyond detection, while those from the N-terminal domain are virtually unaffected, implying that the C-terminal domain binds to the factor, while the N-terminal domain dimer retains its rotational freedom mediated by the flexible hinge between the two domains. Factor-dependent variations in linewidths further reveal that L12 binds to each factor with a dissociation constant in the millimolar range in solution. These results indicate that the L12-factor complexes will be highly populated on the ribosome, because of the high local concentration of ribosome-bound factor with respect to L12.     

Elongation factor G participates in ribosome disassembly by interacting with ribosome recycling factor at their tRNA-mimicry domains

Elongation factor G (EF-G) is a G protein with motor function that drives two target molecules, a tRNA in the translating ribosome and the ribosome recycling factor (RRF) in the post-termination complex. How G protein motor action is transmitted to RRF is unknown. Thermus thermophilus RRF is nonfunctional in Escherichia coli. It became functional upon introducing a plasmid expressing E. coli EF-G with surface changes in its tRNA-mimic domain or by replacing the E. coli EF-G tRNA-mimic domain by the Thermus domain. Thermus RRF could also be activated by introducing surface substitutions in its anticodon arm-mimic region. These gain-of-function phenotypes depend on the combination of heterologous EF-G and RRF alleles. These mutational studies suggest that EF-G motor action is transmitted to RRF by specific surface contacts between the domains that mimic the anticodon arm.     

Domain III of elongation factor G from Thermus thermophilus is essential for induction of GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome

Two elongation factors (EF) EF-Tu and EF-G participate in the elongation phase during protein biosynthesis on the ribosome. Their functional cycles depend on GTP binding and its hydrolysis. The EF-Tu complexed with GTP and aminoacyl-tRNA delivers tRNA to the ribosome, whereas EF-G stimulates translocation, a process in which tRNA and mRNA movements occur in the ribosome. In the present paper we report that: (a) intrinsic GTPase activity of EF-G is influenced by excision of its domain III; (b) the EF-G lacking domain III has a 10(3)-fold decreased GTPase activity on the ribosome, whereas its affinity for GTP is slightly decreased; and (c) the truncated EF-G does not stimulate translocation despite the physical presence of domain IV, which is also very important for translocation. By contrast, the interactions of the truncated factor with GDP and fusidic acid-dependent binding of EF-G.GDP complex to the ribosome are not influenced. These findings indicate an essential contribution of domain III to activation of GTP hydrolysis. These results also suggest conformational changes of the EF-G molecule in the course of its interaction with the ribosome that might be induced by GTP binding and hydrolysis.     

Heterologous expression of Aquifex aeolicus ribosome recycling factor in Escherichia coli is dominant lethal by forming a complex that lacks functional co-ordination for ribosome disassembly

Recycling the post-termination ribosomal complex requires the co-ordinated effort of the ribosome, ribosome recycling factor (RRF) and elongation factor EF-G. Although Aquifex aeolicus RRF (aaRRF) binds Escherichia coli ribosomes as efficiently as E. coli RRF, the resulting complex is non-functional and dominant lethal in E. coli, even in the presence of homologous A. aeolicus EF-G. These findings suggest that the E. coli post-termination ribosomal complex with aaRRF lacks functional co-ordination with EF-G required for ribosome recycling. A chimeric EF-G (E. coli domains I-III, A. aeolicus domains IV-V) or an A. aeolicus EF-G with distinct mutations in the domain I-II interface could activate aaRRF. Furthermore, novel mutations that localize to one surface of the L-shape structure of aaRRF restored activity in E. coli. These aaRRF mutations are spatially distinct from mutations previously described and suggest a novel active centre for coupling EF-G's G domain motor action to ribosome disassembly.     

Structure of the fMet-tRNA(fMet)-binding domain of B. stearothermophilus initiation factor IF2

The three-dimensional structure of the fMet-tRNA(fMet) -binding domain of translation initiation factor IF2 from Bacillus stearothermophilus has been determined by heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. Its structure consists of six antiparallel beta-strands, connected via loops, and forms a closed beta-barrel similar to domain II of elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G, despite low sequence homology. Two structures of the ternary complexes of the EF-Tu small middle dotaminoacyl-tRNA small middle dot GDP analogue have been reported and were used to propose and discuss the possible fMet-tRNA(fMet)-binding site of IF2.     

Unique antibiotic sensitivity of archaebacterial polypeptide elongation factors.

The antibiotic sensitivity of the archaebacterial factors catalyzing the binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to ribosomes (elongation factor Tu [EF-Tu] for eubacteria and elongation factor 1 [EF1] for eucaryotes) and the translocation of peptidyl-tRNA (elongation factor G [EF-G] for eubacteria and elongation factor 2 [EF2] for eucaryotes) was investigated by using two EF-Tu and EF1 [EF-Tu(EF1)]-targeted drugs, kirromycin and pulvomycin, and the EF-G and EF2 [EF-G(EF2)]-targeted drug fusidic acid. The interaction of the inhibitors with the target factors was monitored by using polyphenylalanine-synthesizing cell-free systems. A survey of methanogenic, halophilic, and sulfur-dependent archaebacteria showed that elongation factors of organisms belonging to the methanogenic-halophilic and sulfur-dependent branches of the "third kingdom" exhibit different antibiotic sensitivity spectra. Namely, the methanobacterial-halobacterial EF-Tu(EF1)-equivalent protein was found to be sensitive to pulvomycin but insensitive to kirromycin, whereas the methanobacterial-halobacterial EF-G(EF2)-equivalent protein was found to be sensitive to fusidic acid. By contrast, sulfur-dependent thermophiles were unaffected by all three antibiotics, with two exceptions; Thermococcus celer, whose EF-Tu(EF1)-equivalent factor was blocked by pulvomycin, and Thermoproteus tenax, whose EF-G(EF2)-equivalent factor was sensitive to fusidic acid. On the whole, the results revealed a remarkable intralineage heterogeneity of elongation factors not encountered within each of the two reference (eubacterial and eucaryotic) kingdoms.     

Structural insights into fusidic acid resistance and sensitivity in EF-G

Fusidic acid (FA) is a steroid antibiotic commonly used against Gram positive bacterial infections. It inhibits protein synthesis by stalling elongation factor G (EF-G) on the ribosome after translocation. A significant number of the mutations conferring strong FA resistance have been mapped at the interfaces between domains G, III and V of EF-G. However, direct information on how such mutations affect the structure has hitherto not been available. Here we present the crystal structures of two mutants of Thermus thermophilus EF-G, G16V and T84A, which exhibit FA hypersensitivity and resistance in vitro, respectively. These mutants also have higher and lower affinity for GTP respectively than wild-type EF-G. The mutations cause significant conformational changes in the switch II loop that have opposite effects on the position of a key residue, Phe90, which undergoes large conformational changes. This correlates with the importance of Phe90 in FA sensitivity reported in previous studies. These structures substantiate the importance of the domain G/domain III/domain V interfaces as a key component of the FA binding site. The mutations also cause subtle changes in the environment of the "P-loop lysine", Lys25. This led us to examine the conformation of the equivalent residue in all structures of translational GTPases, which revealed that EF-G and eEF2 form a group separate from the others and suggested that the role of Lys25 may be different in the two groups.     

Functional interaction between bases C1049 in domain II and G2751 in domain VI of 23S rRNA in Escherichia coli ribosomes

The factor-binding center within the Escherichia coli ribosome is comprised of two discrete domains of 23S rRNA: the GTPase-associated region (GAR) in domain II and the sarcin–ricin loop in domain VI. These two regions appear to collaborate in the factor-dependent events that occur during protein synthesis. Current X-ray crystallography of the ribosome shows an interaction between C1049 in the GAR and G2751 in domain VI. We have confirmed this interaction by site-directed mutagenesis and chemical probing. Disruption of this base pair affected not only the chemical modification of some bases in domains II and VI and in helix H89 of domain V, but also ribosome function dependent on both EF-G and EF-Tu. Mutant ribosomes carrying the C1049 to G substitution, which show enhancement of chemical modification at G2751, were used to probe the interactions between the regions around 1049 and 2751. Binding of EF-G-GDP-fusidic acid, but not EF-G-GMP-PNP, to the ribosome protected G2751 from modification. The G2751 protection was also observed after tRNA binding to the ribosomal P and E sites. The results suggest that the interactions between the bases around 1049 and 2751 alter during different stages of the translation process.     

Studies on polypeptide-chain-elongation factors from an extreme thermophile, Thermus thermophilus HB8. 2. Catalytic properties.

Catalytic properties of the elongation factors from Thermus thermophilus HB8 have been studied and compared with those of the factors from Escherichia coli. 1. The formation of a ternary guanine-nucleotide . EF-Tu . EF-Ts complex was demonstrated by gel filtration of the T. thermophilus EF-Tu . EF-Ts complex on a Sephadex G-150 column equilibrated with guanine nucleotide. The occurrence of this type of complex has not yet been proved with the factors from E. coli. 2. The dissociation constants for the complexes of T. thermophilus EF-Tu . EF-Ts with GDP and GTP were 6.1 x 10(-7) M and 1.9 x 10(-6) M respectively. On the other hand, T. thermophilus EF-Tu interacted with GDP and GTP with dissociation constants of 1.1 x 10(-9) M and 5.8 x 10(-8) M respectively. This suggests that the association of EF-Ts with EF-Tu lowered the affinity of EF-Tu for GDP by a factor of about 600 and facilitated the nucleotide exchange reaction. 3. Although the T. thermophilus EF-Tu . EF-Ts complex hardly dissociates into EF-Tu and EF-Ts, a rapid exchange was observed between free EF-Ts and the EF-Tu . EF-Ts complex using 3H-labelled EF-Ts. The exchange reaction was independent on the presence or absence of guanine nucleotides. 4. Based on the above findings, an improved reaction mechanism for the regeneration of EF-Tu . GTP from EF-Tu . GDP is proposed. 5. Studies on the functional interchangeability of EF-Tu and EF-Ts between T. thermophilus and E. coli has revealed that the factors function much more efficiently in the homologous than in the heterologous combination. 6. T. thermophilus EF-Ts could bind E. coli EF-Tu to form an EF-Tu (E. coli) . EF-Ts (T. thermophilus hybrid complex. The complex was found to exist in a dimeric form indicating that the property to form a dimer is attributable to T. thermophilus EF-Ts. On the other hand, no stable complex between E. coli EF-Ts and T. thermophilus EF-Tu has been isolated. 7. The uncoupled GTPase activity of T. thermophilus EF-G was much lower than that of E. coli EF-G. T. thermophilus EF-G formed a relatively stable binary EF-G . GDP complex, which could be isolated on a nitrocellulose membrane filter. The Kd values for EF-G . GDP and EF-G . GTP were 6.7 x 10(-7) M and 1.2 x 10(-5) M respectively. The ternary T. thermophilus EF-G . GDP . ribosome complex was again very stable and could be isolated in the absence of fusidic acid. The stability of the latter complex is probably the cause of the low uncoupled GTPase activity of T. thermophilus EF-G.     

Stimulation of the GTPase activity of translation elongation factor G by ribosomal protein L7/12

Elongation factors (EFs) Tu and G are GTPases that have important functions in protein synthesis. The low intrinsic GTPase activity of both factors is strongly stimulated on the ribosome by unknown mechanisms. Here we report that isolated ribosomal protein L7/12 strongly stimulates GTP hydrolysis by EF-G, but not by EF-Tu, indicating a major contribution of L7/12 to GTPase activation of EF-G on the ribosome. The effect is due to the acceleration of the catalytic step because the rate of GDP-GTP exchange on EF-G, as measured by rapid kinetics, is much faster than the steady-state GTPase rate. The unique, highly conserved arginine residue in the C-terminal domain of L7/12 is not essential for the activation, excluding an "arginine finger"-type mechanism. L7/12 appears to function by stabilizing the GTPase transition state of EF-G.