C. elegans Model Identifies Genetic Modifiers of ��-Synuclein Inclusion Formation During Aging

Inclusions in the brain containing α-synuclein are the pathological hallmark of Parkinson''s disease, but how these inclusions are formed and how this links to disease is poorly understood. We have developed a C. elegans model that makes it possible to monitor, in living animals, the formation of α-synuclein inclusions. In worms of old age, inclusions contain aggregated α- synuclein, resembling a critical pathological feature. We used genome-wide RNA interference to identify processes involved in inclusion formation, and identified 80 genes that, when knocked down, resulted in a premature increase in the number of inclusions. Quality control and vesicle-trafficking genes expressed in the ER/Golgi complex and vesicular compartments were overrepresented, indicating a specific role for these processes in α-synuclein inclusion formation. Suppressors include aging-associated genes, such as sir-2.1/SIRT1 and lagr-1/LASS2. Altogether, our data suggest a link between α-synuclein inclusion formation and cellular aging, likely through an endomembrane-related mechanism. The processes and genes identified here present a framework for further study of the disease mechanism and provide candidate susceptibility genes and drug targets for Parkinson''s disease and other α-synuclein related disorders.     

Intervening with urinary tract infections using anti-adhesives based on the crystal structure of the FimH-oligomannose-3 complex

Background

Escherichia coli strains adhere to the normally sterile human uroepithelium using type 1 pili, that are long, hairy surface organelles exposing a mannose-binding FimH adhesin at the tip. A small percentage of adhered bacteria can successfully invade bladder cells, presumably via pathways mediated by the high-mannosylated uroplakin-Ia and α3β1 integrins found throughout the uroepithelium. Invaded bacteria replicate and mature into dense, biofilm-like inclusions in preparation of fluxing and of infection of neighbouring cells, being the major cause of the troublesome recurrent urinary tract infections.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We demonstrate that α-d-mannose based inhibitors of FimH not only block bacterial adhesion on uroepithelial cells but also antagonize invasion and biofilm formation. Heptyl α-d-mannose prevents binding of type 1-piliated E. coli to the human bladder cell line 5637 and reduces both adhesion and invasion of the UTI89 cystitis isolate instilled in mouse bladder via catheterization. Heptyl α-d-mannose also specifically inhibited biofilm formation at micromolar concentrations. The structural basis of the great inhibitory potential of alkyl and aryl α-d-mannosides was elucidated in the crystal structure of the FimH receptor-binding domain in complex with oligomannose-3. FimH interacts with Manα1,3Manβ1,4GlcNAcβ1,4GlcNAc in an extended binding site. The interactions along the α1,3 glycosidic bond and the first β1,4 linkage to the chitobiose unit are conserved with those of FimH with butyl α-d-mannose. The strong stacking of the central mannose with the aromatic ring of Tyr48 is congruent with the high affinity found for synthetic inhibitors in which this mannose is substituted for by an aromatic group.

Conclusions/Significance

The potential of ligand-based design of antagonists of urinary tract infections is ruled by the structural mimicry of natural epitopes and extends into blocking of bacterial invasion, intracellular growth and capacity to fluxing and of recurrence of the infection.     

Synphilin-1 enhances α-synuclein aggregation in yeast and contributes to cellular stress and cell death in a Sir2-dependent manner

Background

Parkinson''s disease is characterized by the presence of cytoplasmic inclusions, known as Lewy bodies, containing both aggregated α-synuclein and its interaction partner, synphilin-1. While synphilin-1 is known to accelerate inclusion formation by α-synuclein in mammalian cells, its effect on cytotoxicity remains elusive.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We expressed wild-type synphilin-1 or its R621C mutant either alone or in combination with α-synuclein in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and monitored the intracellular localization and inclusion formation of the proteins as well as the repercussions on growth, oxidative stress and cell death. We found that wild-type and mutant synphilin-1 formed inclusions and accelerated inclusion formation by α-synuclein in yeast cells, the latter being correlated to enhanced phosphorylation of serine-129. Synphilin-1 inclusions co-localized with lipid droplets and endomembranes. Consistently, we found that wild-type and mutant synphilin-1 interacts with detergent-resistant membrane domains, known as lipid rafts. The expression of synphilin-1 did not incite a marked growth defect in exponential cultures, which is likely due to the formation of aggresomes and the retrograde transport of inclusions from the daughter cells back to the mother cells. However, when the cultures approached stationary phase and during subsequent ageing of the yeast cells, both wild-type and mutant synphilin-1 reduced survival and triggered apoptotic and necrotic cell death, albeit to a different extent. Most interestingly, synphilin-1 did not trigger cytotoxicity in ageing cells lacking the sirtuin Sir2. This indicates that the expression of synphilin-1 in wild-type cells causes the deregulation of Sir2-dependent processes, such as the maintenance of the autophagic flux in response to nutrient starvation.

Conclusions/Significance

Our findings demonstrate that wild-type and mutant synphilin-1 are lipid raft interacting proteins that form inclusions and accelerate inclusion formation of α-synuclein when expressed in yeast. Synphilin-1 thereby induces cytotoxicity, an effect most pronounced for the wild-type protein and mediated via Sir2-dependent processes.     

Increased ��-synuclein phosphorylation and nitration in the aging primate substantia nigra

Post-translational modifications of α-synuclein occur in the brain of patients affected by Parkinson''s disease and other α-synucleinopathies, as indicated by the accumulation of Lewy inclusions containing phosphorylated (at serine 129) and nitrated α-synuclein. Here we found that phospho-Ser 129 and nitrated α-synuclein are also formed within dopaminergic neurons of the monkey substantia nigra as a result of normal aging. Dopaminergic cell bodies immunoreactive for phospho-Ser 129 and nitrated α-synuclein were rarely seen in adult mature animals but became significantly more frequent in the substantia nigra of old primates. Dual labeling with antibodies against phospho-Ser 129 and nitrated α-synuclein revealed only limited colocalization and mostly stained distinct sub-populations of dopaminergic neurons. Age-related elevations of modified protein paralleled an increase in the number of neurons immunoreactive for unmodified α-synuclein, supporting a relationship between higher levels of normal protein and enhanced phosphorylation/nitration. Other mechanisms were also identified that likely contribute to α-synuclein modifications. In particular, increased expression of Polo-like kinase 2 within neurons of older animals could contribute to phospho-Ser 129 α-synuclein production. Data also indicate that a pro-oxidant environment characterizes older neurons and favors α-synuclein nitration. Aging is an unequivocal risk factor for human α-synucleinopathies. These findings are consistent with a mechanistic link between aging, α-synuclein abnormalities and enhanced vulnerability to neurodegenerative processes.     

N-Glycosylation of the I-like Domain of ��1 Integrin Is Essential for ��1 Integrin Expression and Biological Function: IDENTIFICATION OF THE MINIMAL N-GLYCOSYLATION REQUIREMENT FOR ��5��1*

N-Glycosylation of integrin α5β1 plays a crucial role in cell spreading, cell migration, ligand binding, and dimer formation, but the detailed mechanisms by which N-glycosylation mediates these functions remain unclear. In a previous study, we showed that three potential N-glycosylation sites (α5S3–5) on the β-propeller of the α5 subunit are essential to the functional expression of the subunit. In particular, site 5 (α5S5) is the most important for its expression on the cell surface. In this study, the function of the N-glycans on the integrin β1 subunit was investigated using sequential site-directed mutagenesis to remove the combined putative N-glycosylation sites. Removal of the N-glycosylation sites on the I-like domain of the β1 subunit (i.e. the Δ4-6 mutant) decreased both the level of expression and heterodimeric formation, resulting in inhibition of cell spreading. Interestingly, cell spreading was observed only when the β1 subunit possessed these three N-glycosylation sites (i.e. the S4-6 mutant). Furthermore, the S4-6 mutant could form heterodimers with either α5S3-5 or α5S5 mutant of the α5 subunit. Taken together, the results of the present study reveal for the first time that N-glycosylation of the I-like domain of the β1 subunit is essential to both the heterodimer formation and biological function of the subunit. Moreover, because the α5S3-5/β1S4-6 mutant represents the minimal N-glycosylation required for functional expression of the β1 subunit, it might also be useful for the study of molecular structures.Integrin is a heterodimeric glycoprotein that consists of both an α and a β subunit (1). The interaction between integrin and the extracellular matrix is essential to both physiologic and pathologic events, such as cell migration, development, cell viability, immune homeostasis, and tumorigenesis (2, 3). Among the integrin superfamily, β1 integrin can combine with 12 distinct α subunits (α1–11, αv) to form heterodimers, thereby acquiring a wide variety of ligand specificity (1, 4). Integrins are thought to be regulated by inside-out signaling mechanisms that provoke conformational changes, which modulate the affinity of integrin for the ligand (5). However, an increasing body of evidence suggests that cell-surface carbohydrates mediate a variety of interactions between integrin and its extracellular environment, thereby affecting integrin activity and possibly tumor metastasis as well (6–8).Guo et al. (9) reported that an increase in β1–6-GlcNAc sugar chains on the integrin β1 subunit stimulated cell migration. In addition, elevated sialylation of the β1 subunit, because of Ras-induced STGal-I transferase activity, also induced cell migration (10, 11). Conversely, cell migration and spreading were reduced by the addition of a bisecting GlcNAc, which is a product of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III),² to the α5β1 and α3β1 integrins (12, 13). Alterations of N-glycans on integrins might also regulate their cis interactions with membrane-associated proteins, including the epidermal growth factor receptor, the galectin family, and the tetraspanin family of proteins (14–19).In addition to the positive and negative regulatory effects of N-glycan, several research groups have reported that N-glycans must be present on integrin α5β1 for the αβ heterodimer formation and proper integrin-matrix interactions. Consistent with this hypothesis, in the presence of the glycosylation inhibitor, tunicamycin, normal integrin-substrate binding and transport to the cell surface are inhibited (20). Moreover, treatment of purified integrin with N-glycosidase F blocked both the inherent association of the subunits and the interaction between integrin and fibronectin (FN) (21). These results suggest that N-glycosylation is essential to the functional expression of α5β1. However, because integrin α5β1 contains 26 potential N-linked glycosylation sites, 14 in the α subunit and 12 in the β subunit, identification of the sites that are essential to its biological functions is key to understanding the molecular mechanisms by which N-glycans alter integrin function. Recently, our group determined that N-glycosylation of the β-propeller domain on the α5 subunit is essential to both heterodimerization and biological functions of the subunit. Furthermore, we determined that sites 3–5 are the most important sites for α5 subunit-mediated cell spreading and migration on FN (22). The purpose of this study was to clarify the roles of N-glycosylation of the β1 subunit. Therefore, we performed combined substitutions in the putative N-glycosylation sites by replacement of asparagine residues with glutamine residues. We subsequently introduced these mutated genes into β1-deficient epithelial cells (GE11). The results of these mutation experiments revealed that the N-glycosylation sites on the I-like domain of the β1 subunit, sites number 4–6 (S4-6), are essential to both heterodimer formation and biological functions, such as cell spreading.     

[3H]Epibatidine Photolabels Non-equivalent Amino Acids in the Agonist Binding Site of Torpedo and ��4��2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonists, such as epibatidine and its molecular derivatives, are potential therapeutic agents for a variety of neurological disorders. In order to identify determinants for subtype-selective agonist binding, it is important to determine whether an agonist binds in a common orientation in different nAChR subtypes. To compare the mode of binding of epibatidine in a muscle and a neuronal nAChR, we photolabeled Torpedo α₂βγδ and expressed human α4β2 nAChRs with [³H]epibatidine and identified by Edman degradation the photolabeled amino acids. Irradiation at 254 nm resulted in photolabeling of αTyr¹⁹⁸ in agonist binding site Segment C of the principal (+) face in both α subunits and of γLeu¹⁰⁹ and γTyr¹¹⁷ in Segment E of the complementary (−) face, with no labeling detected in the δ subunit. For affinity-purified α4β2 nAChRs, [³H]epibatidine photolabeled α4Tyr¹⁹⁵ (equivalent to Torpedo αTyr¹⁹⁰) in Segment C as well as β2Val¹¹¹ and β2Ser¹¹³ in Segment E (equivalent to Torpedo γLeu¹⁰⁹ and γTyr¹¹¹, respectively). Consideration of the location of the photolabeled amino acids in homology models of the nAChRs based upon the acetylcholine-binding protein structure and the results of ligand docking simulations suggests that epibatidine binds in a single preferred orientation within the α-γ transmitter binding site, whereas it binds in two distinct orientations in the α4β2 nAChR.Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs)³ are prototypical members of the Cys loop superfamily of neurotransmitter-gated ion channels that mediate the actions of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (1). nAChRs from vertebrate skeletal muscle and the electric organs of Torpedo rays are heteropentamers of homologous subunits with a stoichiometry of 2α:β:γ(ϵ):δ that are arranged pseudosymmetrically around central cation-selective ion channels (1, 2). There are 12 mammalian neuronal nAChR subunit genes: nine neuronal α subunits (α2–α10) and three neuronal β subunits (β2–β4). The α4β2 nAChR is the most abundant and widely distributed nAChR subtype expressed in the brain and is a major target for potential therapeutic agents for neurological diseases and conditions, including nicotine dependence and Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases (3, 4). Although the ratio of α4 to β2 subunit in vivo is uncertain, expressed receptors containing either three α4 or three β2 subunits have distinct pharmacological properties (5, 6).The agonist binding sites (ABS) of nAChRs are located within the amino-terminal extracellular domain at the interface of adjacent subunits (α-γ and α-δ in the Torpedo nAChR), and different nAChR subunit combinations form ABS with distinct physical and pharmacological properties (3, 7). Affinity labeling studies with Torpedo nAChR and site-directed mutational analyses of muscle and neuronal nAChRs identified key amino acids delineating the ABS from three noncontiguous stretches of the α subunit (Segments A-C, the principal component (+ face)) and three noncontiguous regions of the non-α subunit (Segments D–F, the complementary component (− face)) (8, 9). The three-dimensional structure of the ABS in the absence and presence of nAChR agonists or competitive antagonists has been determined for snail acetylcholine-binding proteins (AChBPs) that are soluble homopentamers homologous to the extracellular (amino-terminal) domain of a nAChR (10–12). In the AChBP, four aromatic amino acids from Segments A–C that are conserved within α subunits, along with a conserved Trp in Segment D, form a core aromatic “pocket” with a dimension optimal for accommodation of a trimethylammonium group. The other amino acids in the non-α subunits closest to the aromatic pocket, which are generally not conserved among γ, δ, or neuronal β subunits, are on three antiparallel β strands. The AChBP structure was used to refine the structure of the Torpedo nAChR in the absence of agonist to 4 Å resolution (13). In this structure, there is a reorientation of Segments A–C, resulting in the absence of a well defined core aromatic binding pocket.Analysis of agonist interactions with mutant nAChRs containing fluorine-substituted core aromatic residues provides evidence that cation-π interactions, particularly with αTrp¹⁴⁹ in Segment B, are important determinants of agonist binding affinity (14) and for the higher affinity binding of nicotine to α4β2 nAChRs compared with α₂βγδ nAChRs (15). Mutational analyses and molecular docking calculations have also provided evidence that two molecules of very similar structure may actually bind to a single receptor in very different orientations, as seen for two high affinity antagonists, d-tubocurarine and its quaternary ammonium analog metocurine, binding to the AChBP and to the muscle nAChR (16, 17).Photoaffinity labeling provides an alternative means to identify amino acids contributing to a drug binding site (18, 19) and has been used to determine the orientation of drugs bound in the ABS of Torpedo nAChR (20). Epibatidine binds with very high affinity (∼10 pm) to heteromeric neuronal nAChRs (e.g. α4β2) and with nanomolar affinity to α7 and muscle-type/Torpedo nAChRs (3). Utilizing a photoreactive analogue of epibatidine (azidoepibatidine; Fig. 1) and mass spectrometry, Tomizawa et al. (21) identified photolabeled amino acids in the Aplysia AChBP (Tyr¹⁹⁵ in Segment C and Met¹¹⁶ in Segment E), establishing an orientation for bound azidoepibatidine consistent with the orientation of epibatidine in an AChBP crystal structure (12).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Structure of [³H]epibatidine (top) and azidoepibatidine (bottom).In this report, we use [³H]epibatidine as a photoaffinity reagent to identify the amino acids photolabeled in an expressed α4β2 nAChR and in the Torpedo α₂βγδ nAChR. Comparisons of the labeled amino acids seen in the Torpedo nAChR α-γ binding site and in the α4β2 nAChR, in conjunction with the results of docking calculations for epibatidine binding to homology models of the α₂βγδ and α4β2 nAChRs, suggests that epibatidine binds in a single orientation in the α-γ site but in two orientations in the α4β2 ABS.     

Chaperones of F1-ATPase

Mitochondrial F₁-ATPase contains a hexamer of alternating α and β subunits. The assembly of this structure requires two specialized chaperones, Atp11p and Atp12p, that bind transiently to β and α. In the absence of Atp11p and Atp12p, the hexamer is not formed, and α and β precipitate as large insoluble aggregates. An early model for the mechanism of chaperone-mediated F₁ assembly (Wang, Z. G., Sheluho, D., Gatti, D. L., and Ackerman, S. H. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 1486–1493) hypothesized that the chaperones themselves look very much like the α and β subunits, and proposed an exchange of Atp11p for α and of Atp12p for β; the driving force for the exchange was expected to be a higher affinity of α and β for each other than for the respective chaperone partners. One important feature of this model was the prediction that as long as Atp11p is bound to β and Atp12p is bound to α, the two F₁ subunits cannot interact at either the catalytic site or the noncatalytic site interface. Here we present the structures of Atp11p from Candida glabrata and Atp12p from Paracoccus denitrificans, and we show that some features of the Wang model are correct, namely that binding of the chaperones to α and β prevents further interactions between these F₁ subunits. However, Atp11p and Atp12p do not resemble α or β, and it is instead the F₁ γ subunit that initiates the release of the chaperones from α and β and their further assembly into the mature complex.Mitochondrial F₁-ATPase consists of three α and three β subunits occupying alternate positions in a hexamer that surrounds a rod-like element containing one each of γ, δ, and ϵ subunits (1–3). Three nucleotide-binding catalytic sites (CS)⁴ and three noncatalytic sites (NCS) alternate at the six α/β interfaces. Early work with respiratory-deficient strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (4) revealed that two additional mitochondrial proteins, Atp11p and Atp12p, which are not integral subunits of the enzyme, are nonetheless necessary for the assembly of F₁-ATPase. Besides their failure to assemble F₁, a particularly interesting feature of atp11 and atp12 mutants is that they accumulate α and β subunits as high molecular weight aggregates (4) that can be recognized as densely stained inclusion bodies in the mitochondrial matrix (5). Subsequent studies in yeast have shown that Atp12p binds to F₁ α (6) and that Atp11p binds to β (7); these interactions include binding determinants in the nucleotide binding domains (NBD) of the two F₁ subunits. On this basis, it is now recognized that Atp11p and Atp12p are members of two new families of molecular chaperones, pfam06644 and pfam07542 (8), which are required for the assembly of mitochondrial ATP synthase in all eukaryotes. In fact, the first nuclear genetic lesion associated to a defect of mitochondrial ATP synthase in humans was identified in the locus ATPAF2 for Atp12p and was responsible for the death of a 14-month-old infant (9). Atp12p is also present in the α subdivision of Proteobacteria, consistent with the proposed origin of mitochondria from this ancestral line (10).The nature of the interactions between the F₁ subunits and Atp11p and Atp12p has remained elusive because of the lack of structural information for these chaperones. As α and β aggregate in the absence of Atp11p and Atp12p, it is usually assumed that the F₁ subunits are themselves poorly soluble, and that the two chaperones maintain them in a dispersed state until they are incorporated in the mature enzyme. Based on the analysis of the distribution of hydrophilic and hydrophobic areas on the surface of the α and β subunits of F₁, and on the interaction energies between these subunits at the interfaces that provide the CS and NCS sites, Wang et al. (6) have proposed a model of F₁ assembly in which Atp11p binds at the region of the β subunit that contributes to the CS site, and Atp12p binds at the region of the α subunit that contributes to the NCS site. One consequence of this particular binding of Atp11p and Atp12p to the F₁ subunits is that as long as Atp11p is bound to β and Atp12p is bound to α, the two F₁ subunits cannot interact at either the CS or the NCS interface. Since no other modulators of chaperone release are known, the Wang model requires an exchange of Atp11p for α and of Atp12p for β. Implied in this model is that the chaperones must themselves look very much like the α and β subunits, and that the driving force for the exchange must simply be a higher affinity of α and β for each other than for the respective chaperone partners. Here we present the structures of Atp11p from Candida glabrata and Atp12p from Paracoccus denitrificans, and we show that some features of the Wang model are correct, namely that binding of the chaperones to α and β prevents further interactions between these F₁ subunits. However, Atp11p and Atp12p do not resemble α or β, and it is instead the F₁ γ subunit that initiates the release of the chaperones from α and β and their further assembly into mature complex.     

Dissecting the Mechanisms of Tissue Transglutaminase-induced Cross-linking of α-Synuclein: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PATHOGENESIS OF PARKINSON DISEASE*S?

Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of Parkinson disease (PD). However, exactly how tTG modulates the structural and functional properties of α-synuclein (α-syn) and contributes to the pathogenesis of PD remains unknown. Using site-directed mutagenesis combined with detailed biophysical and mass spectrometry analyses, we sought to identify the exact residues involved in tTG-catalyzed cross-linking of wild-type α-syn and α-syn mutants associated with PD. To better understand the structural consequences of each cross-linking reaction, we determined the effect of tTG-catalyzed cross-linking on the oligomerization, fibrillization, and membrane binding of α-syn in vitro. Our findings show that tTG-catalyzed cross-linking of monomeric α-syn involves multiple cross-links (specifically 2-3). We subjected tTG-catalyzed cross-linked monomeric α-syn composed of either wild-type or Gln → Asn mutants to sequential proteolysis by multiple enzymes and peptide mapping by mass spectrometry. Using this approach, we identified the glutamine and lysine residues involved in tTG-catalyzed intramolecular cross-linking of α-syn. These studies demonstrate for the first time that Gln⁷⁹ and Gln¹⁰⁹ serve as the primary tTG reactive sites. Mutating both residues to asparagine abolishes tTG-catalyzed cross-linking of α-syn and tTG-induced inhibition of α-syn fibrillization in vitro. To further elucidate the sequence and structural basis underlying these effects, we identified the lysine residues that form isopeptide bonds with Gln⁷⁹ and Gln¹⁰⁹. This study provides mechanistic insight into the sequence and structural basis of the inhibitory effects of tTG on α-syn fibrillogenesis in vivo, and it sheds light on the potential role of tTG cross-linking on modulating the physiological and pathogenic properties of α-syn.Parkinson disease (PD)² is a progressive movement disorder that is caused by the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, the part of the brain responsible for controlling movement. Clinically, PD is manifested in symptoms that include tremors, rigidity, and difficulty in initiating movement (bradykinesia). Pathologically, PD is characterized by the presence of intraneuronal, cytoplasmic inclusions known as Lewy bodies (LB), which are composed primarily of the protein “α-synuclein” (α-syn) (1) and are seen in the post-mortem brains of PD patients with the sporadic or familial forms of the disease (2). α-Syn is a presynaptic protein of 140 residues with a “natively” unfolded structure (3). Three missense point mutations in α-syn (A30P, E46K, and A53T) are associated with the early-onset, dominant, inherited form of PD (4, 5). Moreover, duplication or triplication of the α-syn gene has been linked to the familial form of PD, suggesting that an increase in α-syn expression is sufficient to cause PD. Together, these findings suggest that α-syn plays a central role in the pathogenesis of PD.The molecular and cellular determinants that govern α-syn oligomerization and fibrillogenesis in vivo remain poorly understood. In vitro aggregation studies have shown that the mutations associated with PD (A30P, E46K, and A53T) accelerate α-syn oligomerization, but only E46K and A53T α-syn show higher propensity to fibrillize than wild-type (WT) α-syn (6-8). This suggests that oligomerization, rather than fibrillization, is linked to early-onset familial PD (9). Our understanding of the molecular composition and biochemical state of α-syn in LBs has provided important clues about protein-protein interactions and post-translational modifications that may play a role in modulating oligomerization, fibrillogenesis, and LB formation of the protein. In addition to ubiquitination (10), phosphorylation (11, 12), nitration (13, 14), and C-terminal truncation (15, 16), analysis of post-mortem brain tissues from PD and Lewy bodies in dementia patients has confirmed the colocalization of tissue transglutaminase (tTG)-catalyzed cross-linked α-syn monomers and higher molecular aggregates in LBs within dopaminergic neurons (17, 18). Tissue transglutaminase catalyzes a calcium-dependent transamidating reaction involving glutamine and lysine residues, which results in the formation of a covalent cross-link via ε-(γ-glutamyl) lysine bonds (Fig. 2F). To date, seven different isoforms of tTGs have been reported, of which only tTG2 seems to be expressed in the human brain (19), whereas tTG1 and tTG3 are more abundantly found in stratified squamous epithelia (20). Subsequent immuno-histochemical, colocalization, and immunoprecipitation studies have shown that the levels of tTG and cross-linked α-syn species are increased in the substantia nigra of PD brains (17). These findings, combined with the known role of tTG in cross-linking and stabilizing bimolecular assemblies, led to the hypothesis that tTG plays an important role in the initiation and propagation of α-syn fibril formation and that it contributes to fibril stability in LBs. This hypothesis was initially supported by in vitro studies demonstrating that tTG catalyzes the polymerization of the α-syn-derived non-amyloid component (NAC) peptide via intermolecular covalent cross-linking of residues Gln⁷⁹ and Lys⁸⁰ (21) and by other studies suggesting that tTG promotes the fibrillization of amyloidogenic proteins implicated in the pathogenesis of other neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease, supranuclear palsy, Huntington disease, and other polyglutamine diseases (22-24). However, recent in vitro studies with full-length α-syn have shown that tTG catalyzes intramolecular cross-linking of monomeric α-syn and inhibits, rather than promotes, its fibrillization in vitro (25, 26). The structural basis of this inhibitory effect and the exact residues involved in tTG-mediated cross-linking of α-syn, as well as structural and functional consequences of these modifications, remain poorly understood.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 2.tTG-catalyzed cross-linking of α-syn involves one to three intramolecular cross-links. A-C, MALDI-TOF/TOF analysis of native (—) and cross-linked (- - -) α-syn, showing that most tTG-catalyzed cross-linking products of WT or disease-associated mutant forms of α-syn are intramolecularly linked (predominant peak with two cross-links), and up to three intramolecular cross-links can occur (left shoulder). The abbreviations M and m/cl are used to designate native and cross-linked α-synuclein, respectively. D and E, kinetic analysis of α-syn (A30P) cross-linking monitored by MALDI-TOF and SDS-PAGE. F, schematic depiction of the tTG-catalyzed chemical reaction (isodipeptide formation) between glutamine and lysine residues.In this study, we have identified the primary glutamine and lysine residues involved in tTG-catalyzed, intramolecularly cross-linked monomeric α-syn and investigated how cross-linking these residues affects the oligomerization, fibrillization, and membrane binding of α-syn in vitro. Using single-site mutagenesis and mass spectrometry applied to exhaustive proteolytic digests of native and cross-linked monomeric α-syn, we identified Gln¹⁰⁹ and Gln⁷⁹ as the major tTG substrates. We demonstrate that the altered electrophoretic mobility of the intramolecularly cross-linked α-syn in SDS-PAGE occurs as a result of tTG-catalyzed cross-linking of Gln¹⁰⁹ to lysine residues in the N terminus of α-syn, which leads to the formation of more compact monomers. Consistent with previous studies, we show that intramolecularly cross-linked α-syn forms off-pathway oligomers that are distinct from those formed by the wild-type protein and that do not convert to fibrils within the time scale of our experiments (3-5 days). We also show that membrane-bound α-syn is a substrate of tTG and that intramolecular cross-linking does not interfere with the ability of monomeric α-syn to adopt an α-helical conformation upon binding to synthetic membranes. These studies provide novel mechanistic insight into the sequence and structural basis of events that allow tTG to inhibit α-syn fibrillogenesis, and they shed light on the potential role of tTG-catalyzed cross-linking in modulating the physiological and pathogenic properties of α-syn.     

Molecular Basis of the Recognition of Nephronectin by Integrin ��8��1

Integrin α8β1 interacts with a variety of Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD)-containing ligands in the extracellular matrix. Here, we examined the binding activities of α8β1 integrin toward a panel of RGD-containing ligands. Integrin α8β1 bound specifically to nephronectin with an apparent dissociation constant of 0.28 ± 0.01 nm, but showed only marginal affinities for fibronectin and other RGD-containing ligands. The high-affinity binding to α8β1 integrin was fully reproduced with a recombinant nephronectin fragment derived from the RGD-containing central “linker” segment. A series of deletion mutants of the recombinant fragment identified the LFEIFEIER sequence on the C-terminal side of the RGD motif as an auxiliary site required for high-affinity binding to α8β1 integrin. Alanine scanning mutagenesis within the LFEIFEIER sequence defined the EIE sequence as a critical motif ensuring the high-affinity integrin-ligand interaction. Although a synthetic LFEIFEIER peptide failed to inhibit the binding of α8β1 integrin to nephronectin, a longer peptide containing both the RGD motif and the LFEIFEIER sequence was strongly inhibitory, and was ∼2,000-fold more potent than a peptide containing only the RGD motif. Furthermore, trans-complementation assays using recombinant fragments containing either the RGD motif or LFEIFEIER sequence revealed a clear synergism in the binding to α8β1 integrin. Taken together, these results indicate that the specific high-affinity binding of nephronectin to α8β1 integrin is achieved by bipartite interaction of the integrin with the RGD motif and LFEIFEIER sequence, with the latter serving as a synergy site that greatly potentiates the RGD-driven integrin-ligand interaction but has only marginal activity to secure the interaction by itself.Integrins are a family of adhesion receptors that interact with a variety of extracellular ligands, typically cell-adhesive proteins in the extracellular matrix (ECM).² They play mandatory roles in embryonic development and the maintenance of tissue architectures by providing essential links between cells and the ECM (1). Integrins are composed of two non-covalently associated subunits, termed α and β. In mammals, 18 α and 8 β subunits have been identified, and combinations of these subunits give rise to at least 24 distinct integrin heterodimers. Based on their ligand-binding specificities, ECM-binding integrins are classified into three groups, namely laminin-, collagen- and RGD-binding integrins (2, 3), of which the RGD-binding integrins have been most extensively investigated. The RGD-binding integrins include α5β1, α8β1, αIIbβ3, and αV-containing integrins, and have been shown to interact with a variety of ECM ligands, such as fibronectin and vitronectin, with distinct binding specificities.The α8 integrin subunit was originally identified in chick nerves (4). Integrin α8β1 is expressed in the metanephric mesenchyme and plays a crucial role in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during the early stages of kidney morphogenesis. Disruption of the α8 gene in mice was found to be associated with severe defects in kidney morphogenesis (5) and stereocilia development (6). To date, α8β1 integrin has been shown to bind to fibronectin, vitronectin, osteopontin, latency-associated peptide of transforming growth factor-β1, tenascin-W, and nephronectin (also named POEM) (7–13), among which nephronectin is believed to be an α8β1 integrin ligand involved in kidney development (10).Nephronectin is one of the basement membrane proteins whose expression and localization patterns are restricted in a tissue-specific and developmentally regulated manner (10, 11). Nephronectin consists of five epidermal growth factor-like repeats, a linker segment containing the RGD cell-adhesive motif (designated RGD-linker) and a meprin-A5 protein-receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase μ (MAM) domain (see Fig. 3A). Although the physiological functions of nephronectin remain only poorly understood, it is thought to play a role in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions through binding to α8β1 integrin, thereby transmitting signals from the epithelium to the mesenchyme across the basement membrane (10). Recently, mice deficient in nephronectin expression were produced by homologous recombination (14). These nephronectin-deficient mice frequently displayed kidney agenesis, a phenotype reminiscent of α8 integrin knock-out mice (14), despite the fact that other RGD-containing ligands, including fibronectin and osteopontin, were expressed in the embryonic kidneys (9, 15). The failure of the other RGD-containing ligands to compensate for the deficiency of nephronectin in the developing kidneys suggests that nephronectin is an indispensable α8β1 ligand that plays a mandatory role in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during kidney development.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 3.Binding activities of α8β1 integrin to nephronectin and its fragments. A, schematic diagrams of full-length nephronectin (NN) and its fragments. RGD-linker and RGD-linker (GST), the central RGD-containing linker segments expressed in mammalian and bacterial expression systems, respectively; PRGDV, a short RGD-containing peptide modeled after nephronectin and expressed as a GST fusion protein (see Fig. 4A for the peptide sequence). The arrowheads indicate the positions of the RGD motif. B, purified recombinant proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE in 7–15% gradient (left and center panels) and 12% (right panels) gels, followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) staining, immunoblotting with an anti-FLAG mAb, or lectin blotting with PNA. The quantities of proteins loaded were: 0.5 μg (for Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining) and 0.1 μg (for blotting with anti-FLAG and PNA) in the left and center panels;1 μg in the right panel. C, recombinant proteins (10 nm) were coated on microtiter plates and assessed for their binding activities toward α8β1 integrin (10 nm) in the presence of 1 mm Mn²⁺. The backgrounds were subtracted as described in the legend to Fig. 2. The results represent the mean ± S.D. of triplicate determinations. D, titration curves of α8β1 integrin bound to full-length nephronectin (NN, closed squares), the RGD-linker segments expressed in 293F cells (RGD-linker, closed triangles) and E. coli (RGD-linker (GST), open triangles), the MAM domain (MAM, closed diamonds), and the PRGDV peptide expressed as a GST fusion protein in E. coli (PRGDV (GST), open circles). The assays were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 2B. The results represent the means of duplicate determinations.Although ligand recognition by RGD-binding integrins is primarily determined by the RGD motif in the ligands, it is the residues outside the RGD motif that define the binding specificities and affinities toward individual integrins (16, 17). For example, α5β1 integrin specifically binds to fibronectin among the many RGD-containing ligands, and requires not only the RGD motif in the 10th type III repeat but also the so-called “synergy site” within the preceding 9th type III repeat for fibronectin recognition (18). Recently, DiCara et al. (19) demonstrated that the high-affinity binding of αVβ6 integrin to its natural ligands, e.g. foot-and-mouth disease virus, requires the RGD motif immediately followed by a Leu-Xaa-Xaa-Leu/Ile sequence, which forms a helix to align the two conserved hydrophobic residues along the length of the helix. Given the presence of many naturally occurring RGD-containing ligands, it is conceivable that the specificities of the RGD-binding integrins are dictated by the sequences flanking the RGD motif or those in neighboring domains that come into close proximity with the RGD motif in the intact ligand proteins. However, the preferences of α8β1 integrin for RGD-containing ligands and how it secures its high-affinity binding toward its preferred ligands remain unknown.In the present study, we investigated the binding specificities of α8β1 integrin toward a panel of RGD-containing cell-adhesive proteins. Our data reveal that nephronectin is a preferred ligand for α8β1 integrin, and that a LFEIFEIER sequence on the C-terminal side of its RGD motif serves as a synergy site to ensure the specific high-affinity binding of nephronectin to α8β1 integrin.     

An N-Glycosylation Site on the��-Propeller Domain of the Integrin ��5 Subunit Plays Key Roles in Both Its Function and Site-specific Modification by��1,4-N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase III

Recently we reported that N-glycans on the β-propeller domain of the integrin α5 subunit (S-3,4,5) are essential for α5β1 heterodimerization, expression, and cell adhesion. Herein to further investigate which N-glycosylation site is the most important for the biological function and regulation, we characterized the S-3,4,5 mutants in detail. We found that site-4 is a key site that can be specifically modified by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III). The introduction of bisecting GlcNAc into the S-3,4,5 mutant catalyzed by GnT-III decreased cell adhesion and migration on fibronectin, whereas overexpression of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V) promoted cell migration. The phenomenon is similar to previous observations that the functions of the wild-type α5 subunit were positively and negatively regulated by GnT-V and GnT-III, respectively, suggesting that the α5 subunit could be duplicated by the S-3,4,5 mutant. Interestingly GnT-III specifically modified the S-4,5 mutant but not the S-3,5 mutant. This result was confirmed by erythroagglutinating phytohemagglutinin lectin blot analysis. The reduction in cell adhesion was consistently observed in the S-4,5 mutant but not in the S-3,5 mutant cells. Furthermore mutation of site-4 alone resulted in a substantial decrease in erythroagglutinating phytohemagglutinin lectin staining and suppression of cell spread induced by GnT-III compared with that of either the site-3 single mutant or wild-type α5. These results, taken together, strongly suggest that N-glycosylation of site-4 on the α5 subunit is the most important site for its biological functions. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that site-specific modification of N-glycans by a glycosyltransferase results in functional regulation.Glycosylation is a crucial post-translational modification of most secreted and cell surface proteins (1). Glycosylation is involved in a variety of physiological and pathological events, including cell growth, migration, differentiation, and tumor invasion. It is well known that glycans play important roles in cell-cell communication, intracellular signal transduction, protein folding, and stability (2, 3).Integrins comprise a family of receptors that are important for cell adhesion. The major function of integrins is to connect cells to the extracellular matrix, activate intracellular signaling pathways, and regulate cytoskeletal formation (4). Integrin α5β1 is well known as a fibronectin (FN)³ receptor. The interaction between integrin α5 and FN is essential for cell migration, cell survival, and development (5–8). In addition, integrins are N-glycan carrier proteins. For example, α5β1 integrin contains 14 and 12 putative N-glycosylation sites on the α5 and β1 subunits, respectively. Several studies suggest that N-glycosylation is essential for functional integrin α5β1. When human fibroblasts were cultured in the presence of 1-deoxymannojirimycin, which prevents N-linked oligosaccharide processing, immature α5β1 integrin appeared on the cell surface, and FN-dependent adhesion was greatly reduced (9). Treatment of purified integrin α5β1 with N-glycosidase F, which cleaves between the innermost N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and asparagine N-glycan residues of N-linked glycoproteins, prevented the inherent association between subunits and blocked α5β1 binding to FN (10).A growing body of evidence indicates that the presence of the appropriate oligosaccharide can modulate integrin activation. N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III) catalyzes the addition of GlcNAc to mannose that is β1,4-linked to an underlying N-acetylglucosamine, producing what is known as a “bisecting” GlcNAc linkage as shown in Fig. 1B. GnT-III is generally regarded as a key glycosyltransferase in N-glycan biosynthetic pathways and contributes to inhibition of metastasis. The introduction of a bisecting GlcNAc catalyzed by GnT-III suppresses additional processing and elongation of N-glycans. These reactions, which are catalyzed in vitro by other glycosyltransferases, such as N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V), which catalyzes the formation of β1,6 GlcNAc branching structures (Fig. 1B) and plays important roles in tumor metastasis, do not proceed because the enzymes cannot utilize the bisected N-glycans as a substrate. Introduction of the bisecting GlcNAc to integrin α5 by overexpression of GnT-III resulted in decreased in ligand binding and down-regulation of cell adhesion and migration (11–13). Contrary to the functions of GnT-III, overexpression of GnT-V promoted integrin α5β1-mediated cell migration on FN (14). These observations clearly demonstrate that the alteration of N-glycan structure affected the biological functions of integrin α5β1. Similarly characterization of the carbohydrate moieties in integrin α3β1 from non-metastatic and metastatic human melanoma cell lines showed that expression of β1,6 GlcNAc branched structures was higher in metastatic cells compared with non-metastatic cells, confirming the notion that the β1,6 GlcNAc branched structure confers invasive and metastatic properties to cancer cells. In fact, Partridge et al. (15) reported that GnT-V-modified N-glycans containing poly-N-acetyllactosamine, the preferred ligand for galectin-3, on surface receptors oppose their constitutive endocytosis, promoting intracellular signaling and consequently cell migration and tumor metastasis.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Potential N-glycosylation sites on the α5 subunit and its modification by GnT-III and GnT-V. A, schematic diagram of potential N-glycosylation sites on the α5 subunit. Putative N-glycosylation sites are indicated by triangles, and point mutations are indicated by crosses (N84Q, N182Q, N297Q, N307Q, N316Q, N524Q, N530Q, N593Q, N609Q, N675Q, N712Q, N724Q, N773Q, and N868Q). B, illustration of the reaction catalyzed by GnT-III and GnT-V. Square, GlcNAc; circle, mannose. TM, transmembrane domain.In addition, sialylation on the non-reducing terminus of N-glycans of α5β1 integrin plays an important role in cell adhesion. Colon adenocarcinomas express elevated levels of α2,6 sialylation and increased activity of ST6GalI sialyltransferase. Elevated ST6GalI positively correlated with metastasis and poor survival. Therefore, ST6GalI-mediated hypersialylation likely plays a role in colorectal tumor invasion (16, 17). In fact, oncogenic ras up-regulated ST6GalI and, in turn, increased sialylation of β1 integrin adhesion receptors in colon epithelial cells (18). However, this is not always the case. The expression of hyposialylated integrin α5β1 was induced by phorbol esterstimulated differentiation in myeloid cells in which the expression of the ST6GalI was down-regulated by the treatment, increasing FN binding (19). A similar phenomenon was also observed in hematopoietic or other epithelial cells. In these cells, the increased sialylation of the β1 integrin subunit was correlated with reduced adhesiveness and metastatic potential (20–22). In contrast, the enzymatic removal of α2,8-linked oligosialic acids from the α5 integrin subunit inhibited cell adhesion to FN (23). Collectively these findings suggest that the interaction of integrin α5β1 with FN is dependent on its N-glycosylation and the processing status of N-glycans.Because integrin α5β1 contains multipotential N-glycosylation sites, it is important to determine the sites that are crucial for its biological function and regulation. Recently we found that N-glycans on the β-propeller domain (sites 3, 4, and 5) of the integrin α5 subunit are essential for α5β1 heterodimerization, cell surface expression, and biological function (24). In this study, to further investigate the underlying molecular mechanism of GnT-III-regulated biological functions, we characterized the N-glycans on the α5 subunit in detail using genetic and biochemical approaches and found that site-4 is a key site that can be specifically modified by GnT-III.     

Mutations in human αA-crystallin/sHSP affect subunit exchange interaction with αB-crystallin

Background

Mutation in αA-crystallin contributes to the development of congenital cataract in humans. Heterooligomerization of αA-crystallin and αB-crystallin is essential for maintaining transparency in the eye lens. The effect of congenital cataract causing mutants of αA-crystallin on subunit exchange and interaction with αB-crystallin is unknown. In the present study, interaction of the mutants of αA-crystallin with αB-crystallin was studied both in vitro and in situ by the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) technique.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In vitro FRET technique was used to demonstrate the rates of subunit exchange of αB-wt with the following αA-crystallin mutants: R12C, R21L, R21W, R49C, R54C, and R116C. The subunit exchange rates (k values) of R21W and R116C with αB-wt decreased drastically as compared to αA-wt interacting with αB-wt. Moderately decreased k values were seen with R12C, R49C and R54C while R21L showed nearly normal k value. The interaction of αA- mutants with αB-wt was also assessed by in situ FRET. YFP-tagged αA mutants were co-expressed with CFP-tagged αB-wt in HeLa cells and the spectral signals were captured with a confocal microscope before and after acceptor laser photobleaching. The interaction of R21W and R116C with αB-wt was decreased nearly 50% as compared to αA-wt while the rest of the mutants showed slightly decreased interaction. Thus, there is good agreement between the in vitro and in situ FRET data.

Conclusions/Significance

Structural changes occurring in these mutants, as reported earlier, could be the underlying cause for the decreased interaction with αB may contribute to development of congenital cataract.