Galpha(16/z) chimeras efficiently link a wide range of G protein-coupled receptors to calcium mobilization

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a class of important therapeutic targets for drug discovery. The integration of GPCRs into contemporary high-throughput functional assays is critically dependent on the presence of appropriate G proteins. Given that different GPCRs can discriminate against distinct G proteins, a universal G protein adapter is extremely desirable. In this report, the authors evaluated two highly promiscuous Galpha(16/z) chimeras, 16z25 and 16z44, for their ability to translate GPCR activation into Ca(2+) mobilization using the fluorescence imaging plate reader (FLIPR) and aequorin. A panel of 24 G(s)- or G(i)-coupled receptors was examined for their functional association with the Galpha(16/z) chimeras. Although most of the GPCRs tested were incapable of inducing Ca(2+) mobilization upon their activation by specific agonists, the introduction of 16z25 or 16z44 allowed all of these GPCRs to mediate agonist-induced Ca(2+) mobilization. In contrast, only 16 of the GPCRs tested were capable of using Galpha(16) to mobilize intracellular Ca(2+). Analysis of dose-response curves obtained with the delta-opioid, dopamine D(1), and Xenopus melatonin Mel1c receptors revealed that the Galpha(16/z) chimeras possess better sensitivity than Galpha(16) in both the FLIPR and aequorin assays. Collectively, these studies help to validate the promiscuity of the Galpha(16/z) chimeras as well as their application in contemporary drug-screening assays that are based on ligand-induced Ca(2+) mobilization.     

Differential involvement of Galpha16 in CC chemokine-induced stimulation of phospholipase Cbeta, ERK, and chemotaxis

Chemokines are known to regulate the chemotaxis of leukocytes and play an important role in immunological processes. Chemokine receptors are widely distributed in hematopoietic cells and are often co-localized with the hematopoietic-specific G(16) and its close relative, G(14). Yet, many chemokine receptors utilize pertussis toxin-sensitive G(i) proteins for signaling. Given that both G(16) and G(14) are capable of linking G(i)-coupled receptors to the stimulation of phospholipase Cbeta, we examined the capacity of six CC chemokine receptors (CCR1, CCR2a, CCR2b, CCR3, CCR5 and CCR7) to interact with G(14) and G(16) in a heterologous expression system. Among the CC chemokine receptors tested, CCR1, CCR2b, and CCR3 were capable of mediating chemokine-induced stimulation of phospholipase Cbeta via either G(14) or G(16). The G(14)/G(16)-mediated responses exhibited CC chemokine dose-dependency and were resistant to pertussis toxin (PTX) treatment. In contrast, CCR2a, CCR5 and CCR7 were unable to interact with G(14) and G(16). Under identical experimental conditions, all six CC chemokine receptors were fully capable of inhibiting adenylyl cyclase via G(i) as well as stimulating phospholipase Cbeta via 16z44, a G(16/z) chimera that possesses increased promiscuity toward G(i)-coupled receptors. Moreover, CCR1-mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation was largely PTX-insensitive in THP-1 monocytic cells that endogenously express Galpha(16). In addition, CCR1 agonist was less efficacious in mediating chemotaxis of THP-1 cells following the knockdown of Galpha(16) by overexpressing siRNA, indicating the participation of Galpha(16) in CCR1-induced cell migration. These results show that different CC chemokine receptors can discriminate against G(14) and G(16) for signal transduction.     

Stimulation of increases in intracellular calcium and prostaglandin E2 generation in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing receptor-Galpha16 fusion proteins

We examined whether fusion proteins of G protein-coupled receptors with the alpha subunit of G(16) (Galpha(16)) could activate downstream signals. We expressed fusion proteins of G(i)-coupled receptors, i.e. CX(3)C chemokine receptor 1 (CX(3)CR1) and M(2) receptor, in Chinese hamster ovary cells. An agonist for CX(3)CR1 induced greater increases in intracellular Ca(2+) and prostaglandin E(2) generation in cells expressing CX(3)CR1-Galpha(16) fusion protein than in cells expressing CX(3)CR1 alone or both CX(3)CR1 and Galpha(16) separately. Similarly, agonist-induced prostaglandin E(2) generation was greater in cells expressing M(2)-Galpha(16) fusion protein than ones expressing M(2) alone or both M(2) and Galpha(16) separately. In cells expressing fusion proteins with Galpha(16) of G(q)-coupled receptors, i.e. urotensin II receptor and M(1) receptor, the relevant agonists induced similar increases in intracellular Ca(2+) and prostaglandin E(2) generation as in ones expressing the receptor alone. In cells expressing urotensin II receptor-Galpha(16) fusion protein, prostaglandin E(2) generation exhibited a lower EC(50) value than the intracellular Ca(2+) increase. These results indicate that agonist-stimulated receptor-Galpha(16) fusion proteins are coupled to downstream signaling pathways, and suggest that receptor-Galpha(16) fusion proteins may be useful for screening for ligands of orphan G protein-coupled receptors and G(i)-coupled receptors.     

Use of Caenorhabditis elegans G{alpha}q chimeras to detect G-protein-coupled receptor signals

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) activate heterotrimeric G-proteins (G(i)-, G(s)-, G(q)-, or G(12)-like) to generate specific intracellular responses, depending on the receptor/G-protein coupling. The aim was to enable a majority of GPCRs to generate a predetermined output by signaling through a single G-protein-supported pathway. The authors focused on calcium responses as the output, then engineered Galpha(q) to promote promiscuous receptor interactions. Starting with a human Galpha(q) containing 5 Galpha(z) residues in the C-terminal receptor recognition domain (hGalpha(q/z5)), they evaluated agonist-stimulated calcium responses for 33 diverse GPCRs (G(i)-, G(s)-, and G(q)-coupled) and found 20 of 33 responders. In parallel, they tested Caenorhabditis elegans Galpha(q) containing 5 or 9 C-terminal Galpha(z) residues (cGalpha(q/z5), cGalpha(q/z9)). Signal detection was enhanced with cGalpha(q/z5) and cGalpha(q/z9) (yielding 25/33 and 26/33 responders, respectively). In a separate study of Galpha(s)-coupled receptors, the authors compared hGalpha(q/s5) versus hGalpha(q/s9), cGalpha(q/s9), andcGalphaq/s21 and observed optimal function with cGalpha(q/s9). Cotransfection of an engineered Galpha(q) "cocktail" (cGalpha(q/z5) plus cGalpha(q/s9)) provided a powerful and efficient screening platform. When the chimeras included N-terminal myristoylation sites (to promote membrane localization), calcium responses were sustained or improved, depending on the receptor. This approach toward a "universal functional assay" is particularly useful for orphan GPCRs whose signaling pathways are unknown.     

Regulation of hematopoietic-specific G-protein Galpha15 and Galpha16 by protein kinase C

Heterotrimeric G proteins mediate cell growth and differentiation by coupling cell surface receptors to intracellular effector enzymes. The G-protein alpha subunit, Galpha(16), and its murine homologue Galpha(15), are expressed specifically in hematopoietic cells and their expression is highly regulated during differentiation of normal and leukemic cells. In this study, we examined the phosphorylation of Galpha(15)/Galpha(16) and its role in receptor and effector coupling. We observed a PMA-stimulated intact cell phosphorylation of Galpha(15) in COS7 cells transfected with Galpha(15) and protein kinase Calpha (PKCalpha), and phosphorylation of endogenous Galpha(16) in HL60 cells. We also showed that peptides derived from the two G-proteins were phosphorylated in vitro using purified brain PKC. Furthermore, we identified the putative phosphorylation site and showed that mutation or deletion of this PKC phosphorylation site inhibited phospholipase C (PLC) activation. The behavior of double mutants with the constitutively active G-protein mutation (QL-mutant) and mutation in the putative phosphorylation site suggests that the phosphorylation site of Galpha(15/16) is essential for receptor-coupled activation of PLC, but not for direct interaction of the G-protein with PLC-beta.     

Molecular determinants for the differential coupling of Galpha(16) to the melatonin MT1, MT2 and Xenopus Mel1c receptors

The pineal neurohormone melatonin modulates a variety of physiological processes through different receptors. It has recently been reported that the cloned melatonin receptors (MT1, MT2 and Mel1c) exhibit differential abilities to stimulate phospholipase C (PLC) via G(16). Here we examined the molecular basis of such differences in melatonin receptor signaling. Coexpression of MT1 or MT2 with the alpha subunit of G(16) (Galpha(16) ) allowed COS-7 cells to accumulate inositol phosphates in response to 2-iodomelatonin. In contrast, Mel1c did not activate Galpha(16) even though its expression was demonstrated by radioligand binding and agonist-induced inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. As Mel1c possesses an exceptionally large C-terminal tail, we further asked if this structural feature prevented productive coupling to Galpha(16). Eleven chimeric melatonin or mutant receptors were constructed by swapping all or part of the C-terminal tail between MT1, MT2 and Mel1c. All chimeras were fully capable of binding 2-[(125) I]iodomelatonin and inhibiting adenylyl cyclase. Chimeras containing the full-length Mel1c tail were incapable of activating Galpha(16), while those that contained the complete C-terminal region of either MT1 or MT2 stimulated PLC. Incorporation of the extra portion of the C-terminal tail of Mel1c to either MT1 or MT2 completely abolished the chimeras' ability to stimulate PLC via Galpha(16). In contrast, truncation of the C-terminal tail of Mel1c allowed interaction with Galpha(16). Our results suggest that Galpha(16) can discern structural differences amid the three melatonin receptors and provide evidence for functional distinction of Mel1c from MT1 and MT2 receptors.     

Selective inhibition of Cav3.3 T-type calcium channels by Galphaq/11-coupled muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

T-type calcium channels play critical roles in controlling neuronal excitability, including the generation of complex spiking patterns and the modulation of synaptic plasticity, although the mechanisms and extent to which T-type Ca(2+) channels are modulated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remain largely unexplored. To examine specific interactions between T-type Ca(2+) channel subtypes and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRS), the Cav3.1 (alpha(1G)), Cav3.2 (alpha(1H)), and Cav3.3 (alpha) T-type Ca(2+)(1I)channels were co-expressed with the M1 Galpha(q/11)-coupled mAChR. Perforated patch recordings demonstrate that activation of M1 receptors has a strong inhibitory effect on Cav3.3 T-type Ca(2+) currents but either no effect or a moderate stimulating effect on Cav3.1 and Cav3.2 peak current amplitudes. This differential modulation was observed for both rat and human T-type Ca(2+) channel variants. The inhibition of Cav3.3 channels by M1 receptors is reversible, use-independent, and associated with a concomitant increase in inactivation kinetics. Loss-of-function experiments with genetically encoded antagonists of Galpha and Gbetagamma proteins and gain-of-function experiments with genetically encoded Galpha subtypes indicate that M1 receptor-mediated inhibition of Cav3.3 occurs through Galpha(q/11). This is supported by experiments showing that activation of the M3 and M5 Galpha(q/11)-coupled mAChRs also causes inhibition of Cav3.3 currents, although Galpha(i)-coupled mAChRs (M2 and M4) have no effect. Examining Cav3.1-Cav3.3 chimeric channels demonstrates that two distinct regions of the Cav3.3 channel are necessary and sufficient for complete M1 receptor-mediated channel inhibition and represent novel sites not previously implicated in T-type channel modulation.     

Functional screening of G protein-coupled receptors by measuring intracellular calcium with a fluorescence microplate reader

Ligand binding studies reveal information about affinity to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) rather than functional properties. Increase in intracellular Ca(2+) appears to represent a universal second messenger signal for a majority of recombinant GPCRs. Here, we exploit Ca(2+) signaling as a fast and sensitive functional screening method for a number of GPCRs coupled to different G proteins. Ca(2+) fluorescence measurements are performed using Oregon Green 488 BAPTA-1/AM and a microplate reader equipped with an injector. Buffer alone or test compounds dissolved in buffer are injected into a cell suspension, and fluorescence intensity is recorded for 30 s. Each of the GPCRs tested--G(q)-coupled P2Y(2), G(s)-coupled dopamine D1 and D5, G(i)-coupled dopamine D2L, and G(q/11)-coupled muscarinic acetylcholine M1--yielded a significant rise in intracellular free [Ca(2+)] on agonist stimulation. Agonist stimulation was dose dependent, as shown for ATP or UTP stimulation of P2Y(2) receptors (EC(50) = 1 microM), SKF38393 stimulation of hD1 and hD5 (EC(50) = 18.1 nM and 2.7 nM), and quinpirole at hD2L (EC(50) = 6.5 nM). SCH23390 (at hD1 and hD5) and spiperone, haloperidol, and clozapine (at hD2L) competitively antagonized the Ca(2+) response. Furthermore, the Ca(2+) assay served to screen suramin analogs for antagonistic activity at P2Y(2) receptors. Screening at dopamine receptors revealed LE300, a new lead for a dopamine receptor antagonist. Advantages of the assay include fast and simple 96- or 384-well plate format (high-throughput screening), use of a visible light-excitable fluorescent dye, applicability to a majority of GPCRs, and simultaneous analysis of distinct Ca(2+) fluxes.     

Differential involvement of Galpha12 and Galpha13 in receptor-mediated stress fiber formation.

The ubiquitously expressed heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins) G12 and G13 have been shown to activate the small GTPase Rho. Rho stimulation leads to a rapid remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton and subsequent stress fiber formation. We investigated the involvement of G12 or G13 in stress fiber formation induced through a variety of Gq/G11-coupled receptors. Using fibroblast cell lines derived from wild-type and Galphaq/Galpha11-deficient mice, we show that agonist-dependent activation of the endogenous receptors for thrombin or lysophosphatidic acid and of the heterologously expressed bradykinin B2, vasopressin V1A, endothelin ETA, and serotonin 5-HT2C receptors induced stress fiber formation in either the presence or absence of Galphaq/Galpha11. Stress fiber assembly induced through the muscarinic M1 and the metabotropic glutamate subtype 1alpha receptors was dependent on Gq/G11 proteins. The activation of the Gq/G11-coupled endothelin ETB and angiotensin AT1A receptors failed to induce stress fiber formation. Lysophosphatidic acid, B2, and 5-HT2C receptor-mediated stress fiber formation was dependent on Galpha13 and involved epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors, whereas thrombin, ETA, and V1A receptors induced stress fiber accumulation via Galpha12 in an EGF receptor-independent manner. Our data demonstrate that many Gq/G11-coupled receptors induce stress fiber assembly in the absence of Galphaq and Galpha11 and that this involves either a Galpha12 or a Galpha13/EGF receptor-mediated pathway.     

Chimeric G proteins extend the range of insect cell-based functional assays for human G protein-coupled receptors

We previously described a functional assay for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) based on stably transformed insect cells and using the promiscuous G protein Galpha16. We now show that, compared with Galpha16, the use of chimeric Galphaq subunits with C-terminal modifications (qi5-HA, qo5-HA, or qz5-HA) significantly enhances the ability of insect cells to redirect Gi-coupled GPCRs into a Gq-type signal transduction pathway. We coexpressed human Gi-coupled GPCRs, G protein alpha subunits (either a chimeric Galphaq or Galpha16), and the calcium-sensitive reporter protein aequorin in Sf9 cells using a nonlytic protein expression system, and measured agonist-induced intracellular calcium flux using a luminometer. Three of the GPCRs (serotonin 1A, 1D, and dopamine D2) were functionally redirected into a Gq-type pathway when coexpressed with the chimeric G proteins, compared with only one (serotonin 1A) with Galpha16. We determined agonist concentration-response relationships for all three receptors, which yielded EC50 values comparable with those achieved in mammalian cell-based assay systems. However, three other Gi-coupled GPCRs (the opioid kappa1 and delta1 receptors, and serotonin 1E) were not coupled to calcium flux by either the G protein chimeras or Galpha16. Possible reasons and solutions for this result are discussed.     

Potent activation of RhoA by Galpha q and Gq-coupled receptors

Heterotrimeric G proteins of the G(i), G(s), and G(q) family control a wide array of physiological functions primarily by regulating the activity of key intracellular second messenger-generating systems. alpha subunits of the G(12) family, Galpha(12) and Galpha(13), however, can promote cellular responses that are independent of conventional second messengers but that result from the activation of small GTP-binding proteins of the Rho family and their downstream targets. These findings led to the identification of a novel family of guanine-nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) that provides a direct link between Galpha(12/13) and Rho stimulation. Recent observations suggest that many cellular responses elicited by Galpha(q) and its coupled receptors also require the functional activity of Rho. However, available evidence suggests that Galpha(q) may act on pathways downstream from Rho rather than by promoting Rho activation. These seemingly conflicting observations and the recent development of sensitive assays to assess the in vivo levels of active Rho prompted us to ask whether Galpha(q) and its coupled receptors can stimulate endogenous Rho. Here we show that the expression of activated forms of Galpha(q) and the stimulation of G(q)-coupled receptors or chimeric Galpha(q) molecules that respond to G(i)-linked receptors can promote a robust activation of endogenous Rho in HEK-293T cells. Interestingly, this response was not prevented by molecules interfering with the ability of Galpha(13) to stimulate its linked RhoGEFs, together suggesting the existence of a novel molecular mechanism by which Galpha(q) and the large family of G(q)-coupled receptors can regulate the activity of Rho and its downstream signaling pathways.     

Stimulation of phospholipase C-epsilon by the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor mediated by cyclic AMP and the GTPase Rap2B

Stimulation of phospholipase C (PLC) by G(q)-coupled receptors such as the M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) is caused by direct activation of PLC-beta enzymes by Galpha(q) proteins. We have recently shown that G(s)-coupled receptors can stimulate PLC-epsilon, apparently via formation of cyclic AMP and activation of the Ras-related GTPase Rap2B. Here we report that PLC stimulation by the M(3) mAChR expressed in HEK-293 cells also involves, in part, similar mechanisms. M(3) mAChR-mediated PLC stimulation and [Ca(2+)](i) increase were reduced by 2',5'-dideoxyadenosine (dd-Ado), a direct adenylyl cyclase inhibitor. On the other hand, overexpression of Galpha(s) or Epac1, a cyclic AMP-regulated guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rap GTPases, enhanced M(3) mAChR-mediated PLC stimulation. Inactivation of Ras-related GTPases with clostridial toxins suppressed the M(3) mAChR responses. The inhibitory toxin effects were mimicked by expression of inactive Rap2B, but not of other inactive GTPases (Rac1, Ras, RalA, Rap1A, and Rap2A). Activation of the M(3) mAChR induced GTP loading of Rap2B, an effect strongly enhanced by overexpression of Galpha(s) and inhibited by dd-Ado. Overexpression of PLC-epsilon and PLC-beta1, but not PLC-gamma1 or PLC-delta1, enhanced M(3) mAChR-mediated PLC stimulation and [Ca(2+)](i) increase. In contrast, expression of a catalytically inactive PLC-epsilon mutant reduced PLC stimulation by the M(3) mAChR and abrogated the potentiating effect of Galpha(s). In conclusion, our findings suggest that PLC stimulation by the M(3) mAChR is a composite action of PLC-beta1 stimulation by Galpha(q) and stimulation of PLC-epsilon apparently mediated by G(s)-dependent cyclic AMP formation and subsequent activation of Rap2B.     

Prostacyclin receptor-induced STAT3 phosphorylation in human erythroleukemia cells is mediated via Galpha(s) and Galpha(16) hybrid signaling

Human prostacyclin receptor (hIP) stimulates STAT3 via pertussis toxin-insensitive G proteins in human erythroleukemia (HEL) cells. Since hIP can utilize G(s) and G(q) proteins for signal transduction and that both G proteins can induce STAT3 phosphorylation and activation via complex signaling networks, we sought to determine if one of them is predominant in mediating the hIP signal. Stimulation of STAT3 Tyr(705) and Ser(727) phosphorylations by the IP-specific agonist, cicaprost, was sensitive to inhibition of protein kinase A, phospholipase Cbeta, protein kinase C, calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and Janus kinase 2/3. Unlike Galpha(16)-mediated regulation of STAT3 in the same cells, cicaprost-induced STAT3 Tyr(705) phosphorylation was resistant to inhibition of Src and MEK while STAT3 Ser(727) phosphorylation distinctly required phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase. This unique inhibitor-sensitivity pattern of STAT3 phosphorylation was reproduced in HEL cells by stimulating the G(16)-coupled C5a receptor in the presence of dibutyryl-cAMP, suggesting that the change in inhibitor-sensitivity was due to activation of the G(s) pathway. This postulation was confirmed by expressing constitutively active Galpha(16)QL and Galpha(s)QL in human embryonic kidney 293 cells and the inhibitor-sensitivity of Galpha(16)QL-induced STAT3 phosphorylations could be converted by the mere presence of Galpha(s)QL to resemble that obtained with cicaprost in HEL cells. In addition, the restoration of the Galpha(16)-mediated inhibitor-sensitivity upon cicaprost induction in Galpha(s)-knocked down HEL cells again verified the pivotal role of G(s) signal. Taken together, our observations illustrate that co-stimulation of G(s) and G(q) can result in the fine-tuning of STAT3 activation status, and this may provide the basis for cell type-specific responses following activation of hIP.     

Synergistic Ca2+ responses by G{alpha}i- and G{alpha}q-coupled G-protein-coupled receptors require a single PLC{beta} isoform that is sensitive to both G{beta}{gamma} and G{alpha}q

Cross-talk between Gα(i)- and Gα(q)-linked G-protein-coupled receptors yields synergistic Ca(2+) responses in a variety of cell types. Prior studies have shown that synergistic Ca(2+) responses from macrophage G-protein-coupled receptors are primarily dependent on phospholipase Cβ3 (PLCβ3), with a possible contribution of PLCβ2, whereas signaling through PLCβ4 interferes with synergy. We here show that synergy can be induced by the combination of Gβγ and Gα(q) activation of a single PLCβ isoform. Synergy was absent in macrophages lacking both PLCβ2 and PLCβ3, but it was fully reconstituted following transduction with PLCβ3 alone. Mechanisms of PLCβ-mediated synergy were further explored in NIH-3T3 cells, which express little if any PLCβ2. RNAi-mediated knockdown of endogenous PLCβs demonstrated that synergy in these cells was dependent on PLCβ3, but PLCβ1 and PLCβ4 did not contribute, and overexpression of either isoform inhibited Ca(2+) synergy. When synergy was blocked by RNAi of endogenous PLCβ3, it could be reconstituted by expression of either human PLCβ3 or mouse PLCβ2. In contrast, it could not be reconstituted by human PLCβ3 with a mutation of the Y box, which disrupted activation by Gβγ, and it was only partially restored by human PLCβ3 with a mutation of the C terminus, which partly disrupted activation by Gα(q). Thus, both Gβγ and Gα(q) contribute to activation of PLCβ3 in cells for Ca(2+) synergy. We conclude that Ca(2+) synergy between Gα(i)-coupled and Gα(q)-coupled receptors requires the direct action of both Gβγ and Gα(q) on PLCβ and is mediated primarily by PLCβ3, although PLCβ2 is also competent.     

Distinct regions of Galpha13 participate in its regulatory interactions with RGS homology domain-containing RhoGEFs

Galpha12 and Galpha13 transduce signals from G protein-coupled receptors to RhoA through RhoGEFs containing an RGS homology (RH) domain, such as p115 RhoGEF or leukemia-associated RhoGEF (LARG). The RH domain of p115 RhoGEF or LARG binds with high affinity to active forms of Galpha12 and Galpha13 and confers specific GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activity, with faster GAP responses detected in Galpha13 than in Galpha12. At the same time, Galpha13, but not Galpha12, directly stimulates the RhoGEF activity of p115 RhoGEF or nonphosphorylated LARG in reconstitution assays. In order to better understand the molecular mechanism by which Galpha13 regulates RhoGEF activity through interaction with RH-RhoGEFs, we sought to identify the region(s) of Galpha13 involved in either the GAP response or RhoGEF activation. For this purpose, we generated chimeras between Galpha12 and Galpha13 subunits and characterized their biochemical activities. In both cell-based and reconstitution assays of RhoA activation, we found that replacing the carboxyl-terminal region of Galpha12 (residues 267-379) with that of Galpha13 (residues 264-377) conferred gain-of-function to the resulting chimeric subunit, Galpha12C13. The inverse chimera, Galpha13C12, exhibited basal RhoA activation which was similar to Galpha12. In contrast to GEF assays, GAP assays showed that Galpha12C13 or Galpha13C12 chimeras responded to the GAP activity of p115 RhoGEF or LARG in a manner similar to Galpha12 or Galpha13, respectively. We conclude from these results that the carboxyl-terminal region of Galpha13 (residues 264-377) is essential for its RhoGEF stimulating activity, whereas the amino-terminal alpha helical and switch regions of Galpha12 and Galpha13 are responsible for their differential GAP responses to the RH domain.     

Gbetagamma-activated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channel activation kinetics via Galphai and Galphao-coupled receptors are determined by Galpha-specific interdomain interactions that affect GDP release rates

Gbetagamma-activated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels have distinct gating properties when activated by receptors coupled specifically to Galpha(o) versus Galpha(i) subunit isoforms, with Galpha(o)-coupled currents having approximately 3-fold faster agonist-evoked activation kinetics. To identify the molecular determinants in Galpha subunits mediating these kinetic differences, chimeras were constructed using pertussis toxin (PTX)-insensitive Galpha(oA) and Galpha(i2) mutant subunits (Galpha(oA(C351G)) and Galpha(i2(C352G))) and examined in PTX-treated Xenopus oocytes expressing muscarinic m2 receptors and Kir3.1/3.2a channels. These experiments revealed that the alpha-helical N-terminal region (amino acids 1-161) and the switch regions of Galpha(i2) (amino acids 162-262) both partially contribute to slowing the GIRK activation time course when compared with the Galpha(oA(C351G))-coupled response. When present together, they fully reproduce Galpha(i2(C352G))-coupled GIRK kinetics. The Galpha(i2) C-terminal region (amino acids 263-355) had no significant effect on GIRK kinetics. Complementary responses were observed with chimeras substituting the Galpha(o) switch regions into the Galpha(i2(C352G)) subunit, which partially accelerated the GIRK activation rate. The Galpha(oA)/Galpha(i2) chimera results led us to examine an interaction between the alpha-helical domain and the Ras-like domain previously implicated in mediating a 4-fold slower in vitro basal GDP release rate in Galpha(i1) compared with Galpha(o). Mutations disrupting the interdomain contact in Galpha(i2(C352G)) at either the alphaD-alphaE loop (R145A) or the switch III loop (L233Q/A236H/E240T/M241T), significantly accelerated the GIRK activation kinetics consistent with the Galpha(i2) interdomain interface regulating receptor-catalyzed GDP release rates in vivo. We propose that differences in Galpha(i) versus Galpha(o)-coupled GIRK activation kinetics are due to intrinsic differences in receptor-catalyzed GDP release that rate-limit Gbetagamma production and is attributed to heterogeneity in Galpha(i) and Galpha(o) interdomain contacts.     

Galpha(12) and galpha(13) inhibit Ca(2+)-dependent exocytosis through Rho/Rho-associated kinase-dependent pathway

The release of neurotransmitters is known to be regulated by activation of heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptors, although precise mechanisms have not yet been elucidated. To assess the role of the G(12) family of heterotrimeric G proteins in the regulation of neurotransmitter release, we established PC12 cell lines that expressed constitutively active Galpha(12) or Galpha(13) using an isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactoside-inducible expression system. In the cells, expression of constitutively active Galpha(12) or Galpha(13) inhibited the high K(+)-evoked [(3)H]dopamine release without any effect on the high K(+)-induced increase in intracellular Ca(2+) concentration. A Ca(2+) ionophore ionomycin-induced [(3)H]dopamine release was also inhibited by the expression of active Galpha(12) or Galpha(13). These inhibitory effects of Galpha(12) and Galpha(13) on [(3)H]dopamine release were mimicked by the expression of constitutively active RhoA. In addition, Y-27632, and inhibitor of Rho-associated kinase, a downstream Rho effector, completely abolished the inhibition of [(3)H]dopamine release by Galpha(12), Galpha(13), and RhoA. These results indicate that Ca(2+)-dependent exocytosis is regulated by Galpha(12) and Galpha(13) through a Rho/Rho-associated kinase-dependent pathway.     

Receptor-mediated changes at the myristoylated amino terminus of Galpha(il) proteins

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) catalyze nucleotide release in heterotrimeric G proteins, the slow step in G protein activation. G i/o family proteins are permanently, cotranslationally myristoylated at the extreme amino terminus. While myristoylation of the amino terminus has long been known to aid in anchoring G i proteins to the membrane, the role of myristoylation with regard to interaction with activated receptors is not known. Previous studies have characterized activation-dependent changes in the amino terminus of Galpha proteins in solution [Medkova, M. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 9963-9972; Preininger, A. M. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 7931-7941], but changes in the environment of specific residues within the Galpha i1 amino terminus during receptor-mediated G i activation have not been reported. Using site-specific fluorescence labeling of individual residues along a stretch of the Galpha il amino terminus, we found specific changes in the environment of these residues upon interaction with the activated receptor and following GTPgammaS binding. These changes map to a distinct surface of the amino-terminal helix opposite the Gbetagamma binding interface. The receptor-dependent fluorescence changes are consistent with a myristoylated amino terminus in the proximity of the membrane and/or receptor. Myristoylation affects both the rate and intensity of receptor activation-dependent changes detected at several residues along the amino terminus (with no significant effect on the rate of receptor-mediated GTPgammaS binding). This work demonstrates that the myristoylated amino terminus of Galpha il proteins undergoes receptor-mediated changes during the dynamic process of G protein signaling.