Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) Binding Protein 2 Functions Coordinately with Receptor Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase β and the IGF-I Receptor To Regulate IGF-I-Stimulated Signaling

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) is a mitogen for vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) and has been implicated in the development and progression of atherosclerosis. IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) modify IGF-I actions independently of IGF binding, but a receptor-based mechanism by which they function has not been elucidated. We investigated the role of IGFBP-2 and receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase β (RPTPβ) in regulating IGF-I signaling and cellular proliferation. IGFBP-2 bound RPTPβ, which led to its dimerization and inactivation. This enhanced PTEN tyrosine phosphorylation and inhibited PTEN activity. Utilization of substrate trapping and phosphatase-dead mutants showed that RPTPβ bound specifically to PTEN and dephosphorylated it. IGFBP-2 knockdown led to decreased PTEN tyrosine phosphorylation and decreased AKT Ser473 activation. IGFBP-2 enhanced IGF-I-stimulated VSMC migration and proliferation. Analysis of aortas obtained from IGFBP-2^−/− mice showed that RPTPβ was activated, and this was associated with inhibition of IGF-I stimulated AKT Ser473 phosphorylation and VSMC proliferation. These changes were rescued following administration of IGFBP-2. These findings present a novel mechanism for coordinate regulation of IGFBP-2 and IGF-I signaling functions that lead to stimulation of VSMC proliferation. The results have important implications for understanding how IGFBPs modulate the cellular response to IGF-I.     

The Direct Binding of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) to Integrin ��v��3 Is Involved in IGF-1 Signaling

It has been proposed that ligand occupancy of integrin αvβ3 with extracellular matrix ligands (e.g. vitronectin) plays a critical role in insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) signaling. We found that expression of αvβ3 enhanced IGF-1-induced proliferation of Chinese hamster ovary cells in serum-free conditions (in the absence of vitronectin). We hypothesized that the direct integrin binding to IGF-1 may play a role in IGF-1 signaling. We demonstrated that αvβ3 specifically and directly bound to IGF-1 in cell adhesion, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-type binding, and surface plasmon resonance studies. We localized the amino acid residues of IGF-1 that are critical for integrin binding by docking simulation and mutagenesis. We found that mutating two Arg residues at positions 36 and 37 in the C-domain of IGF-1 to Glu (the R36E/R37E mutation) effectively reduced integrin binding. Interestingly, although the mutant still bound to IGF1R, it was defective in inducing IGF1R phosphorylation, AKT and ERK1/2 activation, and cell proliferation. Furthermore wild type IGF-1 mediated co-precipitation of αvβ3 and IGF1R, whereas the R36E/R37E mutant did not, suggesting that IGF-1 mediates the interaction between αvβ3 and IGF1R. These results suggest that the direct binding to IGF-1 to integrin αvβ3 plays a role in IGF-1 signaling through ternary complex formation (αvβ3-IGF-IGF1R), and integrin-IGF-1 interaction is a novel target for drug discovery.Integrins are a family of cell adhesion receptors that mediate cell-extracellular matrix (ECM)³ interaction and cell-cell interaction (1). It has been proposed that signaling from inside the cells regulates the ligand binding affinity of integrins (inside-out signaling) (2). Each integrin is a heterodimer containing α and β subunits. At present 18 α and 8 β subunits have been identified that combine to form 24 integrins (3).It has been reported that integrin αvβ3 plays a role in cancer proliferation and invasiveness. High levels of integrin αvβ3 correlate with growth and/or progression of melanoma (4, 5), neuroblastoma (6), breast cancer (7, 8), colon cancer (9), ovarian cancer (10), and cervical cancer (11). Moreover, individuals homozygous for the β3L33P polymorphism that enhances the ligand binding affinity of β3 integrins have an increased risk to develop breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and melanoma (12). However, it remains unclear whether and how increased levels of αvβ3 on tumor cells contribute to cancer development.Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) is a polypeptide hormone (75 kDa) that has a high degree of structural similarity to human proinsulin. IGF-1 acts through binding to the type I IGF receptor (IGF1R), a receptor tyrosine kinase. The IGF1R is a heterotetramer that consists of two α-subunits that contain the ligand-binding domains and two β-subunits that contain the tyrosine kinase activity. After ligand binding, the receptor undergoes a conformational change resulting in the activation of the tyrosine kinase, which results in transphosphorylation of the opposite β-subunit on specific tyrosine residues. These phosphotyrosines then bind to adapter molecules such as Shc and IRS-1. Phosphorylation of these proteins leads to activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways (reviewed in Ref. 13).IGF-1 has been implicated in cancer progression (14). One of the major actions of IGF-1 is to inhibit apoptosis. IGF-1 confers resistance to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. IGF-1 expression levels are increased in breast, lung, prostate, and many other cancers. Several strategies to target IGF-1 signaling have been extensively studied, including small interfering RNA and monoclonal antibodies for IGF1R and kinase inhibitors to inhibit the enzymatic activity of the receptor. The IGF-1 system is a therapeutic target for cancer, and elucidation of the IGF-1 signaling pathway should have a major impact in designing new therapeutic strategies.It has been proposed that ligand occupancy of αvβ3 with ECM ligands such as vitronectin plays a critical role in enhancing IGF-1 signaling (14). It has been reported that inhibiting αvβ3-ECM interaction (“ligand occupancy”) of αvβ3 inhibited IGF-1 actions selectively in cell types that express αvβ3 (14). Inhibiting ligand occupancy of αvβ3 blocked IGF-1-induced cell migration (15), DNA synthesis, IRS-1 phosphorylation, and IGF1R-linked downstream signaling events, such as activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and ERK1/2 (16).In the present study, we demonstrated that expression of αvβ3 enhanced proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in the presence of fetal bovine serum (FBS) and in serum-free conditions if IGF-1 was present. This suggests that IGF-1 is involved in enhanced proliferation of αvβ3-expressing cells. We demonstrated that αvβ3 bound to IGF-1 in several different binding assays. We found that two Arg residues at positions 36 and 37 in the C-domain of IGF-1 are critical for integrin binding by docking simulation and mutagenesis. Mutation of these Arg residues to Glu (the R36E/R37E mutation) effectively reduced integrin binding. Interestingly, the R36E/R37E mutant was defective in inducing cell proliferation and IGF-1 intracellular signaling, although it still bound to IGF1R. We demonstrated that wild type IGF-1 mediated co-precipitation of αvβ3 and IGF1R, whereas the R36E/R37E mutant did not, suggesting that IGF-1 mediates the interaction between αvβ3 and IGF1R. These results suggest that the direct binding to IGF-1 plays a role in IGF-1 signaling.     

The Interaction of Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase α (PTPα) and RACK1 Protein Enables Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1)-stimulated Abl-dependent and -independent Tyrosine Phosphorylation of PTPα

Protein tyrosine phosphatase α (PTPα) promotes integrin-stimulated cell migration in part through the role of Src-phosphorylated PTPα-Tyr(P)-789 in recruiting and localizing p130Cas to focal adhesions. The growth factor IGF-1 also stimulates PTPα-Tyr-789 phosphorylation to positively regulate cell movement. This is in contrast to integrin-induced PTPα phosphorylation, that induced by IGF-1 can occur in cells lacking Src family kinases (SFKs), indicating that an unknown kinase distinct from SFKs can target PTPα. We show that this IGF-1-stimulated tyrosine kinase is Abl. We found that PTPα binds to the scaffold protein RACK1 and that RACK1 coordinates the IGF-1 receptor, PTPα, and Abl in a complex to enable IGF-1-stimulated and Abl-dependent PTPα-Tyr-789 phosphorylation. In cells expressing SFKs, IGF-1-stimulated phosphorylation of PTPα is mediated by RACK1 but is Abl-independent. Furthermore, expressing the SFKs Src and Fyn in SFK-deficient cells switches IGF-1-induced PTPα phosphorylation to occur in an Abl-independent manner, suggesting that SFK activity dominantly regulates IGF-1/IGF-1 receptor signaling to PTPα. RACK1 is a molecular scaffold that integrates growth factor and integrin signaling, and our identification of PTPα as a RACK1 binding protein suggests that RACK1 may coordinate PTPα-Tyr-789 phosphorylation in these signaling networks to promote cell migration.     

Cardiac Function Is Regulated by B56α-mediated Targeting of Protein Phosphatase 2A (PP2A) to Contractile Relevant Substrates

Dephosphorylation of important myocardial proteins is regulated by protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), representing a heterotrimer that is comprised of catalytic, scaffolding, and regulatory (B) subunits. There is a multitude of B subunit family members directing the PP2A holoenzyme to different myocellular compartments. To gain a better understanding of how these B subunits contribute to the regulation of cardiac performance, we generated transgenic (TG) mice with cardiomyocyte-directed overexpression of B56α, a phosphoprotein of the PP2A-B56 family. The 2-fold overexpression of B56α was associated with an enhanced PP2A activity that was localized mainly in the cytoplasm and myofilament fraction. Contractility was enhanced both at the whole heart level and in isolated cardiomyocytes of TG compared with WT mice. However, peak amplitude of [Ca]_i did not differ between TG and WT cardiomyocytes. The basal phosphorylation of cardiac troponin inhibitor (cTnI) and the myosin-binding protein C was reduced by 26 and 35%, respectively, in TG compared with WT hearts. The stimulation of β-adrenergic receptors by isoproterenol (ISO) resulted in an impaired contractile response of TG hearts. At a depolarizing potential of −5 mV, the I_Ca,L current density was decreased by 28% after administration of ISO in TG cardiomyocytes. In addition, the ISO-stimulated phosphorylation of phospholamban at Ser¹⁶ was reduced by 27% in TG hearts. Thus, the increased PP2A-B56α activity in TG hearts is localized to specific subcellular sites leading to the dephosphorylation of important contractile proteins. This may result in higher myofilament Ca²⁺ sensitivity and increased basal contractility in TG hearts. These effects were reversed by β-adrenergic stimulation.     

Acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Clustering Is Regulated Both by Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β (GSK3β)-dependent Phosphorylation and the Level of CLIP-associated Protein 2 (CLASP2) Mediating the Capture of Microtubule Plus-ends

The postsynaptic apparatus of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) traps and anchors acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) at high density at the synapse. We have previously shown that microtubule (MT) capture by CLASP2, a MT plus-end-tracking protein (+TIP), increases the size and receptor density of AChR clusters at the NMJ through the delivery of AChRs and that this is regulated by a pathway involving neuronal agrin and several postsynaptic kinases, including GSK3. Phosphorylation by GSK3 has been shown to cause CLASP2 dissociation from MT ends, and nine potential phosphorylation sites for GSK3 have been mapped on CLASP2. How CLASP2 phosphorylation regulates MT capture at the NMJ and how this controls the size of AChR clusters are not yet understood. To examine this, we used myotubes cultured on agrin patches that induce AChR clustering in a two-dimensional manner. We show that expression of a CLASP2 mutant, in which the nine GSK3 target serines are mutated to alanine (CLASP2–9XS/9XA) and are resistant to GSK3β-dependent phosphorylation, promotes MT capture at clusters and increases AChR cluster size, compared with myotubes that express similar levels of wild type CLASP2 or that are noninfected. Conversely, myotubes expressing a phosphomimetic form of CLASP2 (CLASP2–8XS/D) show enrichment of immobile mutant CLASP2 in clusters, but MT capture and AChR cluster size are reduced. Taken together, our data suggest that both GSK3β-dependent phosphorylation and the level of CLASP2 play a role in the maintenance of AChR cluster size through the regulated capture and release of MT plus-ends.     

The KCNH2 Genetic Polymorphism (1956, C>T) Is a Novel Biomarker That Is Associated with CCB and α,β-ADR Blocker Response in EH Patients in China

Background

KCNH2 (hERG) potassium channels have an integral role in regulating the excitability of smooth muscle cells. Some pathways driven by angiotensin II, nitric oxide and adrenergic receptors blocker are involved in modulating the properties of KCNH2 potassium channels. And these pathways are closely related to blood pressure regulation. Therefore, we hypothesized that KCNH2 genetic polymorphisms may affect blood pressure response to the antihypertensive drug therapies.

Materials and Methods

To evaluate the interactions between KCNH2 genetic polymorphisms and individual blood pressure response to antihypertensive drugs, 370 subjects with essential hypertension (EH) were studied. In evaluating the interactions between KCNH2 genetic polymorphisms and drug response to blood pressure, multivariable ANOVA analysis followed by Bonferroni correction were carried out.

Results

There were statistically significant interactions between KCNH2 (1956, C>T) polymorphism and DBP change (P = 0.010), MAP change (P = 0.014) on azelnidipine or nitrendipine therapy patients at the end of 6 weeks. We found that the KCNH2 (1956,C>T) polymorphism was associated with the hypotensive effects of α,β-ADR blockers of DBP change at the end of 4 and 6 weeks'' treatment in an age- and gender-dependent manner (P = 0.007 and 0.019, respectively). Similar results were also observed for changes in MAP at the end of 4 and 6 weeks (P-values were 0.035 and 0.078, respectively). While patients who received imidapril, candesartan and irbesartan therapy, no significant difference in drug response among KCNH2(1956,C>T) genotype was observed.

Conclusion

We have reported for the first time that KCNH2 (1956, C>T) polymorphism is associated with efficacy of antihypertensive drugs CCBs and ADR blockers, and may serve as a novel biomarker for individualized therapy for certain antihypertensive drugs.     

A Pro-Nerve Growth Factor (proNGF) and NGF Binding Protein, α2-Macroglobulin,Differentially Regulates p75 and TrkA Receptors and Is Relevant to Neurodegeneration Ex Vivo and In Vivo

Nerve growth factor (NGF) is generated from a precursor, proNGF, that is proteolytically processed. NGF preferentially binds a trophic tyrosine kinase receptor, TrkA, while proNGF binds a neurotrophin receptor (NTR), p75^NTR, that can have neurotoxic activity. Previously, we along with others showed that the soluble protein α₂-macroglobulin (α₂M) is neurotoxic. Toxicity is due in part to α₂M binding to NGF and inhibiting trophic activity, presumably by preventing NGF binding to TrkA. However, the mechanisms remained unclear. Here, we show ex vivo and in vivo three mechanisms for α₂M neurotoxicity. First, unexpectedly the α₂M-NGF complexes do bind TrkA receptors but do not induce TrkA dimerization or activation, resulting in deficient trophic support. Second, α₂M makes stable complexes with proNGF, conveying resistance to proteolysis that results in more proNGF and less NGF. Third, α₂M-proNGF complexes bind p75^NTR and are more potent agonists than free proNGF, inducing tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) production. Hence, α₂M regulates proNGF/p75^NTR positively and mature NGF/TrkA negatively, causing neuronal death ex vivo. These three mechanisms are operative in vivo, and α₂M causes neurodegeneration in a p75^NTR- and proNGF-dependent manner. α₂M could be exploited as a therapeutic target, or as a modifier of neurotrophin signals.     

Positive and Negative Allosteric Modulation of an α1β3γ2 γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A (GABAA) Receptor by Binding to a Site in the Transmembrane Domain at the γ+-β? Interface

In the process of developing safer general anesthetics, isomers of anesthetic ethers and barbiturates have been discovered that act as convulsants and inhibitors of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs) rather than potentiators. It is unknown whether these convulsants act as negative allosteric modulators by binding to the intersubunit anesthetic-binding sites in the GABA_AR transmembrane domain (Chiara, D. C., Jayakar, S. S., Zhou, X., Zhang, X., Savechenkov, P. Y., Bruzik, K. S., Miller, K. W., and Cohen, J. B. (2013) J. Biol. Chem. 288, 19343–19357) or to known convulsant sites in the ion channel or extracellular domains. Here, we show that S-1-methyl-5-propyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid (S-mTFD-MPPB), a photoreactive analog of the convulsant barbiturate S-MPPB, inhibits α1β3γ2 but potentiates α1β3 GABA_AR responses. In the α1β3γ2 GABA_AR, S-mTFD-MPPB binds in the transmembrane domain with high affinity to the γ⁺-β⁻ subunit interface site with negative energetic coupling to GABA binding in the extracellular domain at the β⁺-α⁻ subunit interfaces. GABA inhibits S-[³H]mTFD-MPPB photolabeling of γ2Ser-280 (γM2–15′) in this site. In contrast, within the same site GABA enhances photolabeling of β3Met-227 in βM1 by an anesthetic barbiturate, R-[³H]methyl-5-allyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl)barbituric acid (mTFD-MPAB), which differs from S-mTFD-MPPB in structure only by chirality and two hydrogens (propyl versus allyl). S-mTFD-MPPB and R-mTFD-MPAB are predicted to bind in different orientations at the γ⁺-β⁻ site, based upon the distance in GABA_AR homology models between γ2Ser-280 and β3Met-227. These results provide an explanation for S-mTFD-MPPB inhibition of α1β3γ2 GABA_AR function and provide a first demonstration that an intersubunit-binding site in the GABA_AR transmembrane domain binds negative and positive allosteric modulators.