Functional mapping of ribosome-contact sites in the ribosome recycling factor: a structural view from a tRNA mimic

Ribosome recycling factor (RRF) is required for disassembly of the posttermination complex of the ribosome after release of polypeptides. The crystal structure of RRF resembles a tRNA shape, with an architecturally different flexibility compared with tRNA, but its structure-and-function relationships are unknown. We here found that an RRF variant defective in ribosome binding regains the binding capacity through 20 independent secondary changes occurring in three topologically distinct regions of RRF. Because two of these regions are equivalent to the tip of the anticodon stem and the upper surface of the acceptor stem of tRNA, RRF may interact with the ribosome in a way similar to tRNA, spanning 30S and 50S subunits, to exert its action for splitting the ribosome.     

New insights into the enzymatic role of EF-G in ribosome recycling

During translation, elongation factor G (EF-G) plays a catalytic role in tRNA translocation and a facilitative role in ribosome recycling. By stabilizing the rotated ribosome and interacting with ribosome recycling factor (RRF), EF-G was hypothesized to induce the domain rotations of RRF, which subsequently performs the function of splitting the major intersubunit bridges and thus separates the ribosome into subunits for recycling. Here, with systematic mutagenesis, FRET analysis and cryo-EM single particle approach, we analyzed the interplay between EF-G/RRF and post termination complex (PoTC). Our data reveal that the two conserved loops (loop I and II) at the tip region of EF-G domain IV possess distinct roles in tRNA translocation and ribosome recycling. Specifically, loop II might be directly involved in disrupting the main intersubunit bridge B2a between helix 44 (h44 from the 30S subunit) and helix 69 (H69 from the 50S subunit) in PoTC. Therefore, our data suggest a new ribosome recycling mechanism which requires an active involvement of EF-G. In addition to supporting RRF, EF-G plays an enzymatic role in destabilizing B2a via its loop II.     

Solution structure of the ribosome recycling factor from Aquifex aeolicus

The solution structure of ribosome recycling factor (RRF) from hyperthermophilic bacterium, Aquifex aeolicus, was determined by heteronuclear multidimensional NMR spectroscopy. Fifteen structures were calculated using restraints derived from NOE, J-coupling, and T1/T2 anisotropies. The resulting structure has an overall L-shaped conformation with two domains and is similar to that of a tRNA molecule. The domain I (corresponding to the anticodon stem of tRNA) is a rigid three alpha-helix bundle. Being slightly different from usual coiled-coil arrangements, each helix of domain I is not twisted but straight and parallel to the main axis. The domain II (corresponding to the portion with the CCA end of tRNA) is an alpha/beta domain with an alpha-helix and two beta-sheets, that has some flexible regions. The backbone atomic root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) values of both domains were 0.7 A when calculated separately, which is smaller than that of the molecule as a whole (1.4 A). Measurement of 15N-[1H] NOE values show that the residues in the corner of the L-shaped molecule are undergoing fast internal motion. These results indicate that the joint region between two domains contributes to the fluctuation in the orientation of two domains. Thus, it was shown that RRF remains the tRNA mimicry in solution where it functions.     

Ribosome recycling revisited

Ribosome recycling involves the coordinated action of the ribosome recycling factor (RRF), elongation factor EF-G and initiation factor IF3 to disassemble the post-termination complex, recycling the components for the next round of translation. The crystal structure of domain I of RRF (RRF-DI) in complex with the large ribosomal subunit from the eubacteria Deinococcus radiodurans at high resolution reveals the nature and details of the interactions between this protein factor and rRNA/protein components of the ribosome. Universally conserved arginine residues within the RRF-DI establish important interactions with nuleotides of the 23S rRNA, explaining why mutations at these positions abolish factor binding. Furthermore, in conjunction with cryo-EM reconstruction, the X-ray analysis provides a structural complement to the recent biochemical data, offering additional insight into the mechanism of ribosome recycling.     

Elongation factor G participates in ribosome disassembly by interacting with ribosome recycling factor at their tRNA-mimicry domains

Elongation factor G (EF-G) is a G protein with motor function that drives two target molecules, a tRNA in the translating ribosome and the ribosome recycling factor (RRF) in the post-termination complex. How G protein motor action is transmitted to RRF is unknown. Thermus thermophilus RRF is nonfunctional in Escherichia coli. It became functional upon introducing a plasmid expressing E. coli EF-G with surface changes in its tRNA-mimic domain or by replacing the E. coli EF-G tRNA-mimic domain by the Thermus domain. Thermus RRF could also be activated by introducing surface substitutions in its anticodon arm-mimic region. These gain-of-function phenotypes depend on the combination of heterologous EF-G and RRF alleles. These mutational studies suggest that EF-G motor action is transmitted to RRF by specific surface contacts between the domains that mimic the anticodon arm.     

Structural insights into initial and intermediate steps of the ribosome-recycling process

The ribosome-recycling factor (RRF) and elongation factor-G (EF-G) disassemble the 70S post-termination complex (PoTC) into mRNA, tRNA, and two ribosomal subunits. We have determined cryo-electron microscopic structures of the PoTC·RRF complex, with and without EF-G. We find that domain II of RRF initially interacts with universally conserved residues of the 23S rRNA helices 43 and 95, and protein L11 within the 50S ribosomal subunit. Upon EF-G binding, both RRF and tRNA are driven towards the tRNA-exit (E) site, with a large rotational movement of domain II of RRF towards the 30S ribosomal subunit. During this intermediate step of the recycling process, domain II of RRF and domain IV of EF-G adopt hitherto unknown conformations. Furthermore, binding of EF-G to the PoTC·RRF complex reverts the ribosome from ratcheted to unratcheted state. These results suggest that (i) the ribosomal intersubunit reorganizations upon RRF binding and subsequent EF-G binding could be instrumental in destabilizing the PoTC and (ii) the modes of action of EF-G during tRNA translocation and ribosome-recycling steps are markedly different.     

Crystal structure of the ribosome recycling factor from Escherichia coli

We have determined the crystal structure of the Escherichia coli ribosome recycling factor (RRF), which catalyzes the disassembly of the termination complex in protein synthesis. The L-shaped molecule consists of two domains: a triple-stranded antiparallel coiled-coil and an alpha/beta domain. The coil domain has a cylindrical shape and negatively charged surface, which are reminiscent of the anticodon arm of tRNA and domain IV of elongation factor EF-G. We suggest that RRF binds to the ribosomal A-site through its coil domain, which is a tRNA mimic. The relative position of the two domains is changed about an axis along the hydrophobic cleft in the hinge where the alkyl chain of a detergent molecule is bound. The tRNA mimicry and the domain movement observed in RRF provide a structural basis for understanding the role of RRF in protein synthesis.     

Ribosome recycling revisited

Ribosome recycling involves the coordinated action of the ribosome recycling factor (RRF), elongation factor EF-G, and the initiation factor IF3 to disassemble the posttermination complex, recycling the components for the next round of translation. The crystal structure of domain I of RRF (RRF-DI) in complex with the large ribosomal subunit from the eubacteria Deinococcus radiodurans at a high resolution reveals the nature and details of the interactions between this protein factor and the rRNA/protein components of the ribosome. Universally conserved arginine residues within the RRF-DI establish important interactions with nucleotides of the 23S rRNA, thus explaining why mutations at these positions abolish factor binding. Furthermore, in conjunction with cryo-EM reconstruction, the X-ray analysis provides a structural complement to the recent biochemical data, offering additional insight into the mechanism of ribosome recycling. Published in Russian in Molekulyarnaya Biologiya, 2006, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 742–750. The text was submitted by the authors in English.     

Interaction of yeast tRNA(Phe) anticodon arm with 40S ribosomal subunit of rabbit liver.

The 15-nucleotide analog of yeast tRNA(Phe) anticodon arm binds cooperatively to two sites of poly(U) programmed 40S ribosome like intact tRNA(Phe). The cooperativity coefficients appeared to be about 4 for tRNA(Phe) and 50 for its anticodon arm. Anticodon arm contributes the majority of free energy of tRNA binding to a programmed 40S ribosomal subunit. The correct codon-anticodon pairing seems to play the key role in the cooperativity origin. Contrary to the anticodon arm template independent binding of the whole tRNA to the small ribosomal subunit is revealed.     

The translational regulation of threonyl-tRNA synthetase. Functional relationship between the enzyme, the cognate tRNA and the ribosome

The E. coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase gene is negatively autoregulated at the translational level by a direct binding of the enzyme to the leader region of the thrS mRNA. This region folds in four well-defined domains. The enzyme binds to the leader at two major sites: the first is a stem-loop structure located in domain II upstream of the translational initiation site (domain I) which shares structural analogies with the anticodon arm of several tRNA(Thr) isoacceptors. The second site corresponds to a stable stem-loop structure located in domain IV. Both sites are separated by a large unpaired region (domain III). In vivo and in vitro experiments show that the structural integrity of both sites is required for the regulatory process. The binding of the enzyme to its mRNA target site represses its translation by preventing the ribosome from binding to its attachment site. tRNA(Thr) suppresses this inhibitory effect by displacing the mRNA from the enzyme at both the upstream stem-loop structure and the tRNA-like anticodon arm.     

Alignment/misalignment hypothesis for tRNA selection by the ribosome

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are the adaptor molecules that allow the ribosome to decode genetic information during protein synthesis. During decoding, the ribosome must chose the tRNA whose anticodon corresponds to the codon inscribed in the messenger RNA to incorporate the correct amino acid into the growing polypeptide chain. Fidelity is improved dramatically by a GTP hydrolysis event. Information about the correctness of the anticodon must be sent from the decoding center to the elongation factor, EF-Tu, where the GTP hydrolysis takes place. A second discrimination event entails the accommodation of the aminoacyl-tRNA into its fully bound A/A state inside the ribosome. Here, we present a hypothesis for a specific mechanism of signal transduction through the tRNA, which operates during GTPase activation and accommodation. We propose that the rigidity of the tRNA plays an important role in the transmission of the decoding signal. While the tRNA must flex during binding and accommodation, its anisotropic stiffness enables precise positioning of the acceptor arm in the A/T state, the A/A state and the accommodation corridor. Correct alignment will result in optimal GTPase activation and accommodation rates. Incorrect tRNAs, however, whose anticodons are misaligned, will also have acceptor arms that are misaligned, resulting in sub-optimal GTPase activation and accommodation rates. In the case of GTPase activation, it is possible that the misalignment of the acceptor arm affects the rate directly, by altering the conformational change of the switch region of EF-Tu, or indirectly, by changing the alignment of EF-Tu with respect to the sarcin-ricin loop (SRL) of the large ribosomal subunit.     

Expression in Escherichia coli, purification and characterization of Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis ribosome recycling factor

A very promising approach to understanding the mechanism of protein thermostability is to investigate the structure-function relationship of homologous proteins with different thermostabilities. Ribosome recycling factor (RRF), which is an essential factor for protein synthesis in bacteria, may be a good candidate for such study. In this report, a ribosome recycling factor from Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis was expressed and characterized. This protein contains 184 residues, shows 51.4% identity to that of Escherichia coli RRF, and has very strong antigenic cross-reactivity with antibody to E. coli RRF. In vivo activity assay shows that weak residual activity may remain in TteRRF in E. coli cells. Circular dichroism spectral analysis shows that TteRRF has a very similar secondary structure to that of E. coli RRF, implying that they have similar tertiary structures. However, their thermostabilities are significantly different. To find which domain of RRF is mainly responsible for maintaining stability, TteDI/EcoDII and EcoDI/TteDII RRF chimeras were created. Their domain I and domain II are from E. coli and T. tengcongensis RRFs, respectively. The results of GdnHCl and heat induced denaturation of the chimeric RRFs suggest that the domain I plays a major role in maintaining the stability of the RRF molecule.     

X-ray structural studies of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RRF and a comparative study of RRFs of known structure. Molecular plasticity and biological implications

The crystal structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ribosome recycling factor has been determined and refined against three X-ray diffraction data sets, two collected at room temperature and the other at 100K. The two room-temperature data sets differ in the radiation damage suffered by the crystals before the data used for processing were collected. A comparison between the structures refined against the two data sets indicates the possibility of radiation-induced conformational change. The L-shaped molecule is composed of a long three-helix bundle domain (domain I) and a globular domain (domain II) connected by a linker region. The main difference between the room-temperature structure and the low temperature structure is in the rotation of domain II about an axis close to its libration axis. This observation and a detailed comparative study of ribosome recycling factors (RRFs) of known structures led to an elaboration of the present understanding of the structural variability of RRF. The variability involves a change in the angle between the two arms of the molecule, a rotation of domain II in a plane nearly perpendicular to the axis of the helix bundle and an internal rotation of domain II. Furthermore, the domains and the linker could be delineated into fixed and variable regions in a physically meaningful manner. The relative mobility of the domains of the molecule in the crystal structure appears to be similar to that in the ribosome--RRF complex. That permits a meaningful discussion of the structural features of RRF in terms of ribosome--RRF interactions. The structure also provides insights into the results of inter-species complementation studies.     

Orientation of ribosome recycling factor in the ribosome from directed hydroxyl radical probing

Ribosome recycling factor (RRF) disassembles posttermination complexes in conjunction with elongation factor EF-G, liberating ribosomes for further rounds of translation. The striking resemblance of its L-shaped structure to that of tRNA has suggested that the mode of action of RRF may be based on mimicry of tRNA. Directed hydroxyl radical probing of 16S and 23S rRNA from Fe(II) tethered to ten positions on the surface of E. coli RRF constrains it to a well-defined location in the subunit interface cavity. Surprisingly, the orientation of RRF in the ribosome differs markedly from any of those previously observed for tRNA, suggesting that structural mimicry does not necessarily reflect functional mimicry.     

Structural Insights into ribosome recycling factor interactions with the 70S ribosome

At the end of translation in bacteria, ribosome recycling factor (RRF) is used together with elongation factor G to recycle the 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits for the next round of translation. In x-ray crystal structures of RRF with the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome, RRF binds to the large ribosomal subunit in the cleft that contains the peptidyl transferase center. Upon binding of either E. coli or Thermus thermophilus RRF to the E. coli ribosome, the tip of ribosomal RNA helix 69 in the large subunit moves away from the small subunit toward RRF by 8 Å, thereby disrupting a key contact between the small and large ribosomal subunits termed bridge B2a. In the ribosome crystals, the ability of RRF to destabilize bridge B2a is influenced by crystal packing forces. Movement of helix 69 involves an ordered-to-disordered transition upon binding of RRF to the ribosome. The disruption of bridge B2a upon RRF binding to the ribosome seen in the present structures reveals one of the key roles that RRF plays in ribosome recycling, the dissociation of 70S ribosomes into subunits. The structures also reveal contacts between domain II of RRF and protein S12 in the 30S subunit that may also play a role in ribosome recycling.     

Cryo-EM reveals an active role for aminoacyl-tRNA in the accommodation process

During the elongation cycle of protein biosynthesis, the specific amino acid coded for by the mRNA is delivered by a complex that is comprised of the cognate aminoacyl-tRNA, elongation factor Tu and GTP. As this ternary complex binds to the ribosome, the anticodon end of the tRNA reaches the decoding center in the 30S subunit. Here we present the cryo- electron microscopy (EM) study of an Escherichia coli 70S ribosome-bound ternary complex stalled with an antibiotic, kirromycin. In the cryo-EM map the anticodon arm of the tRNA presents a new conformation that appears to facilitate the initial codon-anticodon interaction. Furthermore, the elbow region of the tRNA is seen to contact the GTPase-associated center on the 50S subunit of the ribosome, suggesting an active role of the tRNA in the transmission of the signal prompting the GTP hydrolysis upon codon recognition.     

Transit of tRNA through the Escherichia coli ribosome: cross-linking of the 3' end of tRNA to ribosomal proteins at the P and E sites

Photoreactive derivatives of yeast tRNA(Phe) containing 2-azidoadenosine at their 3' termini were used to trace the movement of tRNA across the 50S subunit during its transit from the P site to the E site of the 70S ribosome. When bound to the P site of poly(U)-programmed ribosomes, deacylated tRNA(Phe), Phe-tRNA(Phe) and N-acetyl-Phe-tRNA(Phe) probes labeled protein L27 and two main sites within domain V of the 23S RNA. In contrast, deacylated tRNA(Phe) bound to the E site in the presence of poly(U) labeled protein L33 and a single site within domain V of the 23S rRNA. In the absence of poly(U), the deacylated tRNA(Phe) probe also labeled protein L1. Cross-linking experiments with vacant 70S ribosomes revealed that deacylated tRNA enters the P site through the E site, progressively labeling proteins L1, L33 and, finally, L27. In the course of this process, tRNA passes through the intermediate P/E binding state. These findings suggest that the transit of tRNA from the P site to the E site involves the same interactions, but in reverse order. Moreover, our results indicate that the final release of deacylated tRNA from the ribosome is mediated by the F site, for which protein L1 serves as a marker. The results also show that the precise placement of the acceptor end of tRNA on the 50S subunit at the P and E sites is influenced in subtle ways both by the presence of aminoacyl or peptidyl moieties and, more surprisingly, by the environment of the anticodon on the 30S subunit.     

Release of ribosome-bound ribosome recycling factor by elongation factor G

Elongation factor G (EF-G) and ribosome recycling factor (RRF) disassemble post-termination complexes of ribosome, mRNA, and tRNA. RRF forms stable complexes with 70 S ribosomes and 50 S ribosomal subunits. Here, we show that EF-G releases RRF from 70 S ribosomal and model post-termination complexes but not from 50 S ribosomal subunit complexes. The release of bound RRF by EF-G is stimulated by GTP analogues. The EF-G-dependent release occurs in the presence of fusidic acid and viomycin. However, thiostrepton inhibits the release. RRF was shown to bind to EF-G-ribosome complexes in the presence of GTP with much weaker affinity, suggesting that EF-G may move RRF to this position during the release of RRF. On the other hand, RRF did not bind to EF-G-ribosome complexes with fusidic acid, suggesting that EF-G stabilized by fusidic acid does not represent the natural post-termination complex. In contrast, the complexes of ribosome, EF-G and thiostrepton could bind RRF, although with lower affinity. These results suggest that thiostrepton traps an intermediate complex having RRF on a position that clashes with the P/E site bound tRNA. Mutants of EF-G that are impaired for translocation fail to disassemble post-termination complexes and exhibit lower activity in releasing RRF. We propose that the release of ribosome-bound RRF by EF-G is required for post-termination complex disassembly. Before release from the ribosome, the position of RRF on the ribosome will change from the original A/P site to a new location that clashes with tRNA on the P/E site.     

Mechanism for the disassembly of the posttermination complex inferred from cryo-EM studies

Ribosome recycling, the disassembly of the posttermination complex after each round of protein synthesis, is an essential step in mRNA translation, but its mechanism has remained obscure. In eubacteria, recycling is catalyzed by RRF (ribosome recycling factor) and EF-G (elongation factor G). By using cryo-electron microscopy, we have obtained two density maps, one of the RRF bound posttermination complex and one of the 50S subunit bound with both EF-G and RRF. Comparing the two maps, we found domain I of RRF to be in the same orientation, while domain II in the EF-G-containing 50S subunit is extensively rotated (approximately 60 degrees) compared to its orientation in the 70S complex. Mapping the 50S conformation of RRF onto the 70S posttermination complex suggests that it can disrupt the intersubunit bridges B2a and B3, and thus effect a separation of the two subunits. These observations provide the structural basis for the mechanism by which the posttermination complex is split into subunits by the joint action of RRF and EF-G.