Molecular mechanisms and binding site location for the noncompetitive antagonist crystal violet on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

We investigated the molecular mechanisms and the binding site location for the fluorophor crystal violet (CrV), a noncompetitive antagonist of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR). To this end, radiolabeled competition binding, fluorescence spectroscopy, Schild-type analysis, patch-clamp recordings, and molecular dynamics approaches were used. The results indicate that (i) CrV interacts with the desensitized Torpedo AChR with higher affinity than with the resting state at several temperatures (5-37 degrees C); (ii) CrV-induced inhibition of the phencyclidine (PCP) analogue [(3)H]thienylcyclohexylpiperidine binding to the desensitized or resting AChR is mediated by a steric mechanism; (iii) tetracaine inhibits CrV binding to the resting AChR, probably by a steric mechanism; (iv) barbiturates modulate CrV binding to the resting AChR by an allosteric mechanism; (v) CrV itself induces AChR desensitization; (vi) CrV decreases the peak of macroscopic currents by acting on the resting AChR but without affecting the desensitization rate from the open state; and (vii) two tertiary amino groups from CrV may bind to the alpha1-Glu(262) residues (located at position 20') in the resting state. We conclude that the CrV binding site overlaps the PCP locus in the resting and desensitized state. The noncompetitive action of CrV may be explained by an allosteric mechanism in which the binding of CrV to the extracellular mouth of the resting receptor leads to an inhibition of channel opening. Binding of CrV probably increases desensitization of the resting channel and stabilizes the desensitized state.     

Reaction of [3H]meproadifen mustard with membrane-bound Torpedo acetylcholine receptor

The Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) contains a binding site for aromatic amine noncompetitive antagonists that is distinct from the binding site for agonists and competitive antagonists. To characterize the location and function of this allosteric antagonist site, an alkylating analog of meproadifen has been synthesized, 2-(chloroethylmethylamino)-ethyl-2, 2-diphenylpentanoate HCl (meproadifen mustard). Reaction of [3H]meproadifen mustard with AChR-rich membrane suspensions resulted in specific incorporation of label predominantly into the AChR alpha-subunit with minor incorporation into the beta-subunit. Specific labeling required the presence of high concentration of agonist and was inhibited by reversible noncompetitive antagonists including proadifen, meproadifen, perhydrohistrionicotoxin (HTX), and tetracaine when present at concentrations consistent with the binding affinity of these compounds for the allosteric antagonist site. No specific alkylation of the AChR alpha-subunit was detected in the absence of agonist, or in the presence of the partial agonist phenyltrimethylammonium or the competitive antagonists, d-tubocurarine, gallamine triethiodide, or decamethonium. Reaction with 35 microM meproadifen mustard for 70 min in the presence of carbamylcholine produced no alteration in the concentration of [3H]ACh-binding sites, but decreased by 38 +/- 4% the number of allosteric antagonist sites as measured by [3H]HTX binding. This decrease was not observed when the alkylation reaction was blocked by the presence of HTX. These results lead us to conclude that meproadifen mustard alkylates the allosteric antagonist site in the Torpedo AChR and that part of that site is associated with the AChR alpha-subunit.     

Structural organization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor of the electric ray Torpedo is the most comprehensively characterized neurotransmitter receptor. It consists of five subunits (alpha2beta gammadelta) amino acid sequences of which were determined by cDNA cloning and sequencing. The shape and size of the receptor were determined by electron cryomicroscopy. It has two agonist/competitive antagonist binding sites which are located between subunits near the membrane surface. The receptor ion channel is formed by five transmembrane helices (M2) of all five subunits. The position of the binding site for noncompetitive ion channel blockers was found by photoaffinity labelling and site-directed mutagenesis. The intrinsic feature of the receptor structure is the position of the agonist/competitive antagonist binding sites in close vicinity to the ion channel spanning the bilayer membrane. This peculiarity may substantially enhance allosteric transitions transforming the ligand binding into the channel opening and physiological response. Muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptors from birds and mammals are also pentaoligomers consisting of four different subunits (alpha2beta gammadelta or alpha2beta epsilondelta) with high homology to the Torpedo receptor. Apparently, the pentaoligomeric structure is the main feature of all nicotinic, both muscle and neuronal, receptors. However, the neuronal receptors are formed only by two subunit types (alpha and beta) or are even pentahomomers (alpha7 neuronal receptors). All nicotinic receptors are ligand-gated ion channel, the properties of the channels being essentially determined by amino acid residues forming M2 transmembrane fragments.     

Cembranoid and long-chain alkanol sites on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and their allosteric interaction

Long-chain alkanols are general anesthetics which can also act as uncharged noncompetitive inhibitors of the peripheral nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) by binding to one or more specific sites on the AChR. Cembranoids are naturally occurring, uncharged noncompetitive inhibitors of peripheral and neuronal AChRs, which have no demonstrable general anesthetic activity in vivo. In this study, [3H]tenocyclidine ([3H]TCP), an analogue of the cationic noncompetitive inhibitor phencyclidine (PCP), was used to characterize the cembranoid and long-chain alkanol sites on the desensitized Torpedo californica AChR and to investigate if these sites interact. These studies confirm that there is a single cembranoid site which sterically overlaps the [3H]TCP channel site. This cembranoid site probably also overlaps the sites for the cationic noncompetitive inhibitors, procaine and quinacrine. Evidence is also presented for one or more allosteric cembranoid sites which negatively modulate cembranoid affinity for the inhibitory site. In contrast, long-chain alkanols inhibit [3H]TCP binding through an allosteric mechanism involving two or more alkanol sites which display positive cooperativity toward each other. Double inhibitor studies show that the cembranoid inhibitory site and the alkanol sites are not independent of each other but interfere allosterically with each other's inhibition of [3H]TCP binding. The simplest models consistent with the observed data are presented and discussed.     

Anionic Lipids Allosterically Modulate Multiple Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Conformational Equilibria

Anionic lipids influence the ability of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor to gate open in response to neurotransmitter binding, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. We show here that anionic lipids with relatively small headgroups, and thus the greatest ability to influence lipid packing/bilayer physical properties, are the most effective at stabilizing an agonist-activatable receptor. The differing abilities of anionic lipids to stabilize an activatable receptor stem from differing abilities to preferentially favor resting over both uncoupled and desensitized conformations. Anionic lipids thus modulate multiple acetylcholine receptor conformational equilibria. Our data suggest that both lipids and membrane physical properties act as classic allosteric modulators influencing function by interacting with and thus preferentially stabilizing different native acetylcholine receptor conformational states.     

Structures of Aplysia AChBP complexes with nicotinic agonists and antagonists reveal distinctive binding interfaces and conformations

Upon ligand binding at the subunit interfaces, the extracellular domain of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor undergoes conformational changes, and agonist binding allosterically triggers opening of the ion channel. The soluble acetylcholine-binding protein (AChBP) from snail has been shown to be a structural and functional surrogate of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the receptor. Yet, individual AChBP species display disparate affinities for nicotinic ligands. The crystal structure of AChBP from Aplysia californica in the apo form reveals a more open loop C and distinctive positions for other surface loops, compared with previous structures. Analysis of Aplysia AChBP complexes with nicotinic ligands shows that loop C, which does not significantly change conformation upon binding of the antagonist, methyllycaconitine, further opens to accommodate the peptidic antagonist, alpha-conotoxin ImI, but wraps around the agonists lobeline and epibatidine. The structures also reveal extended and nonoverlapping interaction surfaces for the two antagonists, outside the binding loci for agonists. This comprehensive set of structures reflects a dynamic template for delineating further conformational changes of the LBD of the nicotinic receptor.     

The ion channel of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is formed by the homologous helices M II of the receptor subunits

A binding site for the channel-blocking noncompetitive antagonist [3H]triphenylmethylphosphonium ([3H]TPMP+) was localized in the alpha-, beta- and delta-chains of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) from Torpedo marmorata electric tissue. The photolabel was found in homologous positions of the highly conserved sequence helix II, alpha 248, beta 254, and delta 262. The site of the photoreaction appears to not be affected by the functional state of the receptor. [3H]TPMP+ was found in position delta 262 independent of whether photolabeling was performed with the receptor in its resting, desensitized or antagonist state. A model of the AChR ion channel is proposed, according to which the channel is formed by the five helices II contributed by the five receptor subunits.     

Molecular mechanisms of acetylcholine receptor–lipid interactions: from model membranes to human biology

Lipids are potent modulators of the Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Lipids influence nicotinic receptor function by allosteric mechanisms, stabilizing varying proportions of pre-existing resting, open, desensitized, and uncoupled conformations. Recent structures reveal that lipids could alter function by modulating transmembrane α-helix/α-helix packing, which in turn could alter the conformation of the allosteric interface that links the agonist-binding and transmembrane pore domains—this interface is essential in the coupling of agonist binding to channel gating. We discuss potential mechanisms by which lipids stabilize different conformational states in the context of the hypothesis that lipid–nicotinic receptor interactions modulate receptor function at biological synapses.     

A novel pharmatope tag inserted into the beta4 subunit confers allosteric modulation to neuronal nicotinic receptors

alpha-Bungarotoxin, the classic nicotinic antagonist, has high specificity for muscle type alpha1 subunits in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. In this study, we show that an 11-amino-acid pharmatope sequence, containing residues important for alpha-bungarotoxin binding to alpha1, confers functional alpha-bungarotoxin sensitivity when strategically placed into a neuronal non-alpha subunit, normally insensitive to this toxin. Remarkably, the mechanism of toxin inhibition is allosteric, not competitive as with neuromuscular nicotinic receptors. Our findings argue that alpha-bungarotoxin binding to the pharmatope, inserted at a subunit-subunit interface diametrically distinct from the agonist binding site, interferes with subunit interface movements critical for receptor activation. Our results, taken together with the structural similarities between nicotinic and GABAA receptors, suggest that this allosteric mechanism is conserved in the Cys-loop ion channel family. Furthermore, as a general strategy, the engineering of allosteric inhibitory sites through pharmatope tagging offers a powerful new tool for the study of membrane proteins.     

A conformational intermediate between the resting and desensitized states of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

The structural changes induced in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor by two noncompetitive channel blockers, proadifen and phencyclidine, have been studied by infrared difference spectroscopy and using the conformationally sensitive photoreactive noncompetitive antagonist 3-(trifluoromethyl)-3-m-([(125)I]iodophenyl)diazirine. Simultaneous binding of proadifen to both the ion channel pore and neurotransmitter sites leads to the loss of positive markers near 1663, 1655, 1547, 1430, and 1059 cm(-)(1) in carbamylcholine difference spectra, suggesting the stabilization of a desensitized conformation. In contrast, only the positive markers near 1663 and 1059 cm(-)(1) are maximally affected by the binding of either blocker to the ion channel pore suggesting that the conformationally sensitive residues vibrating at these two frequencies are stabilized in a desensitized-like conformation, whereas those vibrating near 1655 and 1430 cm(-)(1) remain in a resting-like state. The vibrations at 1547 cm(-)(1) are coupled to those at both 1663 and 1655 cm(-)(1) and thus exhibit an intermediate pattern of band intensity change. The formation of a structural intermediate between the resting and desensitized states in the presence of phencyclidine is further supported by the pattern of 3-(trifluoromethyl)-3-m-([(125)I]iodophenyl)diazirine photoincorporation. In the presence of phencyclidine, the subunit labeling pattern is distinct from that observed in either the resting or desensitized conformations; specifically, there is a concentration-dependent increase in the extent of photoincorporation into the delta-subunit. Our data show that domains of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor interconvert between the resting and desensitized states independently of each other and suggest a revised model of channel blocker action that involves both low and high affinity agonist binding conformational intermediates.     

Desensitization is a property of the cholinergic binding region of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, not of the receptor-integral ion channel.

The reversible acetylcholine esterase inhibitor (-)-physostigmine (eserine) is the prototype of a new class of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) activating ligands: it induces cation fluxes into nAChR-rich membrane vesicles from Torpedo marmorata electric tissue even under conditions of antagonist blocked acetylcholine binding sites (Okonjo, Kuhlmann, Maelicke, Neuron, in press). This suggests that eserine exerts its channel-activating property via binding sites at the nAChR separate from those of the natural transmitter. We now report that eserine can activate the channel even when the receptor has been preincubated (desensitized) with elevated concentrations of acetylcholine. Thus the conformational state of the receptor corresponding to desensitization is confined to the transmitter binding region, leaving the channel fully activatable-albeit only from other than the transmitter binding site(s).     

Microscopic kinetics and energetics distinguish GABA(A) receptor agonists from antagonists

Although agonists and competitive antagonists presumably occupy overlapping binding sites on ligand-gated channels, these interactions cannot be identical because agonists cause channel opening whereas antagonists do not. One explanation is that only agonist binding performs enough work on the receptor to cause the conformational changes that lead to gating. This idea is supported by agonist binding rates at GABA(A) and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that are slower than expected for a diffusion-limited process, suggesting that agonist binding involves an energy-requiring event. This hypothesis predicts that competitive antagonist binding should require less activation energy than agonist binding. To test this idea, we developed a novel deconvolution-based method to compare binding and unbinding kinetics of GABA(A) receptor agonists and antagonists in outside-out patches from rat hippocampal neurons. Agonist and antagonist unbinding rates were steeply correlated with affinity. Unlike the agonists, three of the four antagonists tested had binding rates that were fast, independent of affinity, and could be accounted for by diffusion- and dehydration-limited processes. In contrast, agonist binding involved additional energy-requiring steps, consistent with the idea that channel gating is initiated by agonist-triggered movements within the ligand binding site. Antagonist binding does not appear to produce such movements, and may in fact prevent them.     

Modulation of MK-801-elicited mouse popping behavior by galantamine is complex and dose-dependent

The ability of phencyclidine (PCP), a noncompetitive antagonist of NMDA receptor-mediated neurotransmission, to precipitate a schizophreniform psychosis in susceptible individuals is consistent with the hypothesized pathologic occurrence of NMDA receptor hypofunction in this disorder. Because the psychosis caused by PCP resembles schizophrenia in all of the relevant domains of psychopathology, investigators have sought to characterize animal models of NMDA receptor hypofunction. MK-801 (dizocilpine) binds to the same hydrophobic channel domain in the NMDA receptor-associated ionophore as PCP, and has been shown to elicit intense irregular episodes of jumping behavior in mice, termed "popping." MK-801-elicited mouse popping is an animal model of NMDA receptor hypofunction that has been used to screen novel candidate compounds for the treatment of schizophrenia. Recently, a selective abnormality in the transduction of the acetylcholine signal at the level of the alpha 7 nicotinic receptor has been described in schizophrenia. The existence of a nicotinic cholinergic abnormality in schizophrenia has stimulated interest in a potential therapeutic role for positive allosteric modulation of nicotinic receptors. Galantamine is a compound that possesses two interesting properties: inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and positive allosteric modulation of nicotinic neurotransmission. Theoretically, galantamine would be expected to increase the efficiency or likelihood that acetylcholine will promote channel opening and ionic conductance at nicotinic receptors. As expected, in the current investigation statistically significant popping behavior was elicited by MK-801 in mice (T(22) = 2.16, P < 0.05). This MK-801-elicited popping was significantly attenuated by 100 mg/kg of galantamine (T(22) = 2.24, P < 0.05). The data show that nicotinic interventions can influence NMDA receptor-mediated neurotransmission in the intact mouse.     

Molecular mechanism of AMPA receptor noncompetitive antagonism

AMPA-type glutamate receptors are specifically inhibited by the noncompetitive antagonists GYKI-53655 and CP-465,022, which act through sites and mechanisms that are not understood. Using receptor mutagenesis, we found that these antagonists bind at the interface between the S1 and S2 glutamate binding core and channel transmembrane domains, specifically interacting with S1-M1 and S2-M4 linkers, thereby disrupting the transduction of agonist binding into channel opening. We also found that the antagonists' affinity is higher for agonist-unbound receptors than for activated nondesensitized receptors, further depending on the level of S1 and S2 domain closure. These results provide evidence for substantial conformational changes in the S1-M1 and S2-M4 linkers following agonist binding and channel opening, offering a conceptual frame to account for noncompetitive antagonism of AMPA receptors.     

Desensitization of membrane-bound Torpedo acetylcholine receptor by amine noncompetitive antagonists and aliphatic alcohols: studies of [3H]acetylcholine binding and 22Na+ ion fluxes

Measurements of the kinetics of binding of [3H]acetylcholine ([3H]AcCh) to membrane-bound nicotinic AcCh receptors from Torpedo electric tissue have been used to characterize the effects of a series of amine and alcohol noncompetitive antagonists on receptor conformational equilibria. The receptor exists in multiple, interconvertible conformations distinguished by agonist binding affinity. In the absence of cholinergic ligands, certain aromatic amines including proadifen, dimethisoquin, and lidocaine, as well as propanol and butanol, produce a dose-dependent increase in the fraction of receptors (f) in a high-affinity conformation from a value of fmax approximately 0.17 in the absence of drug to fmax approximately 0.9. Not all noncompetitive antagonists produce that same value of fmax. For histrionicotoxin (HTX), fmax approximately 0.3, and the aromatic amine adiphenine did not alter f while tetracaine actually decreased f to 0.1. The high-affinity receptor conformation stabilized by noncompetitive antagonists was characterized by (1) the rate constant (krec) for receptor reisomerization upon removal of stabilizing ligand and (2) the rate constant (kdis) for dissociation of [3H]AcCh-receptor complexes. On the basis of these criteria, the high-affinity receptor conformation stabilized by amine and alcohol noncompetitive blockers is the same as that stabilized by agonist. At 4 degrees C, krec = (2.2 +/- 0.2) X 10(-3) s-1 and kdis = 4 X 10(-2) s-1. Since HTX and adiphenine produced only a small conformational perturbation, their effects on the actions of proadifen and 2-propanol were examined. HTX and adiphenine antagonized the conformational perturbation caused by proadifen, while mixtures of HTX and 2-propanol produced additive effects. Effects of noncompetitive blockers were also assayed in terms of the inhibition of agonist-induced efflux of 22Na+ from Torpedo vesicles. Exposure to proadifen in the absence of agonist produced a reversible inhibition (desensitization) of the flux response, and recovery from desensitization occurred at the same rate as the reisomerization from the high-affinity receptor state.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Nicotinic Agonists Regulate α-Bungarotoxin Binding Sites of TE671 Human Medulloblastoma Cells

The TE671 human medulloblastoma cell line expresses a variety of characteristics of human neurons. Among these characteristics is the expression of membrane-bound high-affinity binding sites for alpha-bungarotoxin, which is a potent antagonist of functional nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on these cells. These toxin binding sites represent a class of nicotinic receptor isotypes present in mammalian brain. Treatment of TE671 cells during proliferative growth phase with nicotine or carbamylcholine, but not with muscarine or d-tubocurarine, induced up to a five-fold increase in the density of radiolabeled toxin binding sites in crude membrane fractions. This effect was blocked by co-incubation with the nicotinic antagonists d-tubocurarine and decamethonium, but not by mecamylamine or by muscarinic antagonists. Following a 10-13 h lag phase upon removal of agonist, recovery of the up-regulated sites to control values occurred within an additional 10-20 h. These studies indicate that the expression of functional nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on TE671 cells is subject to regulation by nicotinic agonists. Studies of the murine CNS have consistently indicated nicotine-induced up-regulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, thereby supporting the identification of the toxin binding site on these cells as the functional nicotinic receptor. Although a mechanism for this effect is not apparent, nicotine-induced receptor blockade does not appear to be involved.     

Location of the polyamine binding site in the vestibule of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ion channel

To map the structure of a ligand-gated ion channel, we used the photolabile polyamine-containing toxin MR44 as photoaffinity label. MR44 binds with high affinity to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in its closed channel conformation. The binding stoichiometry was two molecules of MR44 per receptor monomer. Upon UV irradiation of the receptor-ligand complex, (125)I-MR44 was incorporated into the receptor alpha-subunit. From proteolytic mapping studies, we conclude that the site of (125)I-MR44 cross-linking is contained in the sequence alpha His-186 to alpha Leu-199, which is part of the extracellular domain of the receptor. This sequence partially overlaps in its C-terminal region with one of the three loops that form the agonist-binding site. The agonist carbachol and the competitive antagonist alpha-bungarotoxin had only minor influence on the photocross-linking of (125)I-MR44. The site where the hydrophobic head group of (125)I-MR44 binds must therefore be located outside the zone that is sterically influenced by agonist bound at the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. In binding and photocross-linking experiments, the luminal noncompetitive inhibitors ethidium and triphenylmethylphosphonium were found to compete with (125)I-MR44. We conclude that the polyamine moiety of (125)I-MR44 interacts with the high affinity noncompetitive inhibitor site deep in the channel of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, while the aromatic ring of this compound binds in the upper part of the ion channel (i.e. in the vestibule) to a hydrophobic region on the alpha-subunit that is located in close proximity to the agonist binding site. The region of the alpha-subunit labeled by (125)I-MR44 should therefore be accessible from the luminal side of the vestibule.     

Crystal Structure of Lymnaea stagnalis AChBP Complexed with the Potent nAChR Antagonist DHβE Suggests a Unique Mode of Antagonism

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are pentameric ligand-gated ion channels that belong to the Cys-loop receptor superfamily. These receptors are allosteric proteins that exist in different conformational states, including resting (closed), activated (open), and desensitized (closed) states. The acetylcholine binding protein (AChBP) is a structural homologue of the extracellular ligand-binding domain of nAChRs. In previous studies, the degree of the C-loop radial extension of AChBP has been assigned to different conformational states of nAChRs. It has been suggested that a closed C-loop is preferred for the active conformation of nAChRs in complex with agonists whereas an open C-loop reflects an antagonist-bound (closed) state. In this work, we have determined the crystal structure of AChBP from the water snail Lymnaea stagnalis (Ls) in complex with dihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE), which is a potent competitive antagonist of nAChRs. The structure reveals that binding of DHβE to AChBP imposes closure of the C-loop as agonists, but also a shift perpendicular to previously observed C-loop movements. These observations suggest that DHβE may antagonize the receptor via a different mechanism compared to prototypical antagonists and toxins.     

Effects of Substance P on the Binding of Agonists to the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor of Torpedo Electroplaque

Abstract: Abstract: The effect of the neuropeptide substance P on the binding of the cholinergic ligands to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor of Torpedo electroplaque membranes was examined at a physiological concentration of NaCl (150 m M ). Substance P had no effect on the initial rate of ¹²⁵I-α-bungarotoxin binding at concentrations of <100 μ M . The peptide did not bind to the high-affinity local anesthetic site but allosterically modulated [³H]phencyclidine binding, positively in the absence of agonist and negatively in the presence of agonist. Substance P increased the apparent affinity of the cholinergic agonists carbamylcholine and acetylcholine at equilibrium. The effect of substance P on the equilibrium binding of [³H]acetylcholine was examined directly, and the peptide appeared to increase the affinity of the binding of the second molecule of agonist, with no effect on the binding of the first. This indicates that substance P can affect the cooperative interactions between agonist binding sites. Substance P appeared to increase the rate of carbamylcholine-induced desensitization; however, the data are also consistent with an allosteric mechanism that does not involve the desensitized state. To attempt to differentiate between these mechanisms, the rates of recovery were determined after exposure to peptide and/or agonist. The kinetics of recovery are consistent with stabilization of the desensitized state by substance P if the peptide remains bound long enough to allow rapid recovery to the low-affinity state. However, an allosteric modulation of agonist binding that does not involve the desensitized state cannot be ruled out.     

Electrostatic interactions regulate desensitization of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

To determine the importance of electrostatic interactions for agonist binding to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR), we examined the affinity of the fluorescent agonist dansyl-C6-choline for the AChR. Increasing ionic strength decreased the binding affinity in a noncompetitive manner and increased the Hill coefficient of binding. Small cations did not compete directly for dansyl-C6-choline binding. The sensitivity to ionic strength was reduced in the presence of proadifen, a noncompetitive antagonist that desensitizes the receptor. Moreover, at low ionic strength, the dansyl-C6-choline affinities were similar in the absence or presence of proadifen, a result consistent with the receptor being desensitized at low ionic strength. Similar ionic strength effects were observed for the binding of the noncompetitive antagonist [(3)H]ethidium when examined in the presence and absence of agonist to desensitize the AChR. Therefore, ionic strength modulates binding affinity through at least two mechanisms: by influencing the conformation of the AChR and by electrostatic effects at the binding sites. The results show that charge-charge interactions regulate the desensitization of the receptor. Analysis of dansyl-C6-choline binding to the desensitized conformation using the Debye-Hückel equation was consistent with the presence of five to nine negative charges within 20 A of the acetylcholine binding sites.