Mole activity in woodlands, fens and other habitats

Monks Wood, a deciduous wood of 155 hectares on clay soil, has an estimated population of 400 moles. There is an anastomosing system of permanent burrows, and when a mole is trapped its area of burrow is soon occupied by another animal. Little new digging occurs, except in winter, after frost has driven the soil fauna deeper into the ground. The burrows usually act as pit-fall traps for the food. Young animals migrating in summer may live more superficially, in tunnels in moss and grass, but survivers usually move into a permanent tunnel system by autumn.
Woodwalton Fen has an easily worked peat soil, and few earthworms. Here moles burrow at all seasons, presumably needing an extensive burrow system to catch sufficient food. In times of flood, the moles leave submerging ground but return very soon after the water subsides. They probably swim across flooded areas but iis yet we do not know if the same animals return after floods to the same burrows.
Moles are not good indicators of soil fertility, particularly as many mole heaps are made by few moles in poor soil, and fewmew heaps may appear in good soil with permanent burrows. We do not understand why there are so few moles in some apparently suitable pasture, with high worm populations, or how others manage to obtain sutficient food in infertile areas.     

Choriocarcinoma after Hydatidiform Mole. Studies Related to Effectiveness of Follow-up Practice after Hydatidiform Mole

Chemotherapy, in conjunction with other methods of treatment, was used in 100 patients with invasive hydatidiform mole or choriocarcinoma following mole. When treatment was instituted within two to six months of the antecedent mole serious drug resistance was not encountered, drug toxicity was slight, the duration of treatment was comparatively short, and sustained remissions were obtained in 57 out of 60 patients. When the start of chemotherapy was delayed beyond six months drug resistance occurred in many instances, toxicity was often severe, the duration of treatment was much longer, and sustained remissions were obtained in 22 out of 40 patients.The practice of giving prophylactic chemotherapy to all patients with mole is not established as effective or safe. Differences in the social background to hydatidiform mole in different geographical areas may be such that conclusions based on evidence from one area are not necessarily applicable to another.Careful follow-up after mole remains essential, though present methods often fail to ensure recognition of choriocarcinoma while it is still curable. Standard qualitative and quantitative methods for detecting the continued excretion of chorionic gonadotrophin, though useful, are sometimes too insensitive. It is suggested that to supplement local arrangements some form of centralized or regionalized follow-up service based on notification of patients with hydatidiform mole, and making use of radioimmunoassays for chorionic gonadotrophin, could reduce deaths attributable to late diagnosis.